This article was written by Aashika Goyal and has been edited and published by Oishika Banerji (Team Lawsikho).
Table of Contents
Introduction
Mergers, acquisitions, and downsizing are concepts under corporate law that enable the company to increase its efficiency, economies of scale, and financial performance. These business practices are generally used to enhance the business model for rapid technological and management advancement of the company. Mergers refer to the practice where two or more companies enter into an arrangement to continue their business as a single entity, while acquisitions refer to the practice where one company takes over the business of another, which may include a subsidiary, its holding company, and an associate company. Downsizing, however, refers to the reduction or layoff of an inefficient workforce by employers, generally to survive harsh economic times. In this article, we will discuss these concepts in detail, including their impact, consequences, and legal compliances to be followed by the company. Mergers, acquisitions, and downsizing are all part of corporate restructuring.
Evolution of corporate restructuring
Before the Economic Reforms Policy of 1991, there was a regulated economy where the government interfered by its policies, rules, framework, etc. in every aspect of business. Earlier, the economy was centralised, and prices were not decided by market forces of supply and demand. The role of financial institutions in setting up the whole new trend of corporate restructuring has increased pursuant to the raid of DCM Ltd. and Escorts Ltd.
Post Industrial Policy 1991 Reforms, the economy was decentralised to ensure more investments from foreign companies, and globalisation resulted in an open competition regime for Indian markets. For instance, there were amendments made in the MRTP Act within all restrictive sections discouraging growth in the industrial sector. Environmental, technological, and capital market change enables the Indian and MNCs to restructure and reestablish their businesses to meet market synergies and compete in the market to ensure profitability and liquidity.
It is ideal to note that in today’s time, a restructuring wave is sweeping the corporate sector across the globe, thereby taking entities, both big and small, and also comprising old economy businesses as conglomerates alongside new economy companies. The infrastructure and service sectors are also very much involved in the same. Mergers, amalgamations, acquisitions, consolidation, and takeovers can be categorised as fundamental parts of the new economic paradigm. Taking note of such evolving times, one can be rest assured that corporate restructuring activities are expected to occur at a larger rate than ever before in the past, thereby placing India swiftly on the international market.
Change in trends of M&A
The concept of corporate restructuring offers various opportunities in the corporate world. Poor business and economic conditions, rapid technological advancement, and increasing competition enable various entities to undergo internal or external reconstruction. The main objectives are to enhance economies of scale, revive sick industrial units, reduce costs, and access advanced research and technology.
The concept evolved subsequently and is still in the process of undergoing changes in order to adapt itself to a dynamic environment. Change in various regulatory frameworks ensures the development and early success of corporations. The main regulatory mechanism has been altered to radically change the Indian takeover market such as SCRA and promulgation of new code i.e. SEBI Takeover Regulations, Finance Act, 1997 etc.
Further, owing to increasing digitisation and the post covid period, many companies tend to restructure their businesses for the purpose of acquiring advanced technology for innovations and to compete in the market efficiently by upskilling their existing and potential efficient workforce. It may also include removing inefficient permanent employees. An increase in digitisation enhances the focus on acquiring and adopting cybersecurity, cloud technologies, data driven information utilities, and AI mechanisms.
When would a company adopt any of these measures
Any company can adopt any of the corporate restructuring measures, depending on various circumstances and factors persisting in the market. It depends on company to company, and no single factor can be a reason for adopting these practices. It depends on multiple factors that determine the method of restructuring. In order to have an effective and successful restructuring of the company, the company takes into consideration a long term and medium term approach to business growth.
These factors or circumstances can depend on a business strategy, financial requirement, regulatory frameworks etc. With major layoffs, retrenchments, bankruptcy, and cash flow requirements, businesses need to cope with increasing competition. Other factors may include:
Debt recovery;
To redirect operational and day to day managerial activities;
Arrange finance requirements to ensure profitable growth;
Develop business competencies;
Have better market share and Revive its position in market;
To meet cash flow requirements;
Obtain tax benefits;
To meet CSR and changing regulatory frameworks;
Diversification of business ideas; and
To remove bankruptcy and insolvency.
Effect of merger, acquisition and downsizing on a company
Corporate restructuring altogether can affect a company’s revival or provide a different business strategy. Many companies undergo pivots to gain position in a market, as in the case of OYO Rooms. Merging a company with another or acquiring another company can provide a competitive advantage.
A company would have efficient management and a defined business structure that enhances the growth and viability of the business. Downsizing proves to be a necessary step when a company has been functioning improperly and needs to change its administrative structure.
Mergers, acquisitions, and downsizing may prove to be of strategic importance and may lead to the dissolution of the company. Hence, it is necessary to take into account all necessary measures, due diligence before entering into any transaction, and compliances to have a positive effect on the company.
Legal requirements of corporate restructuring
Mergers, acquisitions, and downsizing play an important role in the development and growth of the company, and there are various laws to govern their functioning. Various statutes, regulations, rules, orders, notification governs them and different sectoral regulators are involved in implementing these schemes such as RBI, SEBI, CCI, RoC, Central Government, etc.
Corporate restructuring under the Companies Act, 2013
The Companies Act, 2013, provides enabling provisions relating to compromise, arrangements, and amalgamations under Sections 230-240 of the Act. Mergers, acquisitions, or downsizing are part of an arrangement or a compromise of a company for ensuring growth of the company or for reasons to meet the synergies of the economy at that time. Section 232 of the Act provides for a procedure to be followed when a compromise or arrangement is made in connection with a scheme of merger or amalgamation. The Companies Act, 2013, under Section 233, provides for certain companies, such as small companies, their holding companies, and subsidiary companies, to follow a fast track mode of merger or amalgamation at their discretion. The Central Government has the discretion to approve these companies adoption of fast track methods and may also impose certain conditions on them. For any scheme of arrangement with creditors or members, the company had to follow the procedure as per Sections 230-232.
All about corporate restructuring under the Competition Act, 2002
The economic aspects of mergers and combinations are provided under the Competition Act, 2002. This Act provides for the establishment of the commission to regulate the market by protecting the economy from practices that would have an appreciable adverse effect on competition. Merger and acquisition is termed as a combination under the Competition Act. The regulation of combinations is elucidated under Section 6 of the Act. This act made it mandatory to submit a notice to the commission of the proposed combination within 30 days of getting approval from the Board of Directors.
The Competition Commission of India has been empowered under Section 29 to investigate whether disclosure made to it under Section 6 is correct or whether such a proposed combination would have an adverse effect on competition. In case, CCI has prima facie reasons to believe that such a transaction will likely have an impact on the competition, it can issue a show cause notice to the parties as to why an investigation shall not be followed against them. After receipt of the reply, CCI may call for the report of the DG within 7 days. Even after inviting suggestions and objections from the public, if the commission believes that the proposed combination will have an appreciable adverse impact on competition, it may suggest some modifications, and such a combination will be allowed only if these modifications are accepted by the parties or if some amendments are accepted by the CCI as proposed by the parties.
Any failure to provide such notice or declaration will result in a penalty being imposed under Section 43A of the Act against such person, association of persons, enterprise, or association of enterprises.
An insight to corporate restructuring through the lenses of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
Insolvency is a situation where the assets of the company are not sufficient to pay off the liabilities. IBC provides for a framework and procedures to be followed by the creditors or corporate debtor to resolve the debts and liabilities and revive the position of the company. Chapter II of the Code mentions the provisions related to the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) that can be initiated by a financial creditor, operational creditor, or corporate debtor itself. In case of failure of CIRP, debtors will undergo a liquidation process, and assets are realised and distributed by the liquidator.
This Code provides for reconstruction mechanisms and not only debt recovery mechanisms as under the Sick Industrial Companies Act, 1985 (that has now been repealed). Mergers, acquisitions, or downsizing are used to revive the business of the company, and an application needs to be filed before NCLT.
Corporate restructuring under the Income Tax Act, 1961
As per the Income Tax Act, 1961, merger and acquisition are referred to as “amalgamation,” and merging companies are termed “amalgamating companies.” Tax benefits and exemptions differ from the structure of amalgamation. Amalgamation must be confirmed with certain conditions in order for it to be considered tax neutral along with fulfilling requirements under the Companies Act, 2013.
A merger will be considered an amalgamation for the purpose of the Income Tax Act, 1961, when:
All the properties and liabilities of an amalgamating company becomes property and liability of an amalgamated company.
Shareholders holding at least 3/4th in value of shares in amalgamating company became the shareholders of amalgamated company.
Amalgamating company gets an exemption from capital gains tax under section 47 when capital assets of a amalgamating company is transferred to amalgamated company, the capital gain will b exempted from tax or when one foreign company is amalgamated with other foreign company having shares of Indian Company, such gain will not be taxable if not taxable under provisions of foreign company, required that 25% of shareholders of amalgamating company continues to remain shareholders in amalgamated company.
Any expenditure on scientific research by the amalgamating company being transferred to an amalgamated Indian company will be allowed to be carried forward and set off. If such an asset has been sold by the amalgamated company, the cost of the asset will be considered business income, and any price above the cost will be taxable as a capital gain. For example, if an asset costing 10 lakh is sold for 15 lakh, the amount above the cost price, i.e., 5 lakh, will be taxable as a capital gain.
SEBI Regulations and corporate restructuring: an insight
All the regulations to be read, along with the SEBI Act of 2015, must be followed and complied with in order to have a valid and enforceable acquisition or merger of companies.
Effect of cross-border transactions on India
Corporate restructuring can also be done outside India, and it may involve foreign companies. Globalisation has increased avenues for foreign and Indian companies to direct or control the management of other companies. This results in opening the market up to two jurisdictions and helps each company revive or reconstruct itself. Cross-border transactions can be of two types i.e. Indian companies acquiring or merging with foreign companies, and vice-versa. It has been governed by Section 234 of the Companies Act 2013 and various other statutes.
Increasing cross border transactions enhances Indian presence in foreign markets, which results in higher growth, diversification, technological advancement, etc. in the Indian economy. This has also allowed small companies to compete with foreign and advanced companies. These transactions, along with various regulatory approvals, enhance the growth and liquidity of the economy as a whole.
Conclusion
Mergers, acquisitions, and downsizing are some of the methods of corporate restructuring. These types form a major part of the development and growth of Indian markets and require various regulatory approvals for their efficient functioning. Mergers and acquisitions involve external restructuring, but downsizing is generally an internal restructuring mechanism that involves the removal of inefficient employees or workers from the company. A company adopts these measures depending on various factors, such as company profile, development stage of a company, its life cycle, management, its objects and motives, etc. That differs from company to company. To make the most of the corporate restructuring, it is essential for every company to function as per the regulatory frameworks and get appropriate and timely approvals according to various statutes applicable to their industry. Companies should always take recourse to some professional help to comply with every regulation to prevent itself from hefty penalties applicable to them for any contravention of the law.
Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:
This article is written by Sakshi Singh, from Amity Law School, Lucknow. This article provides a detailed analysis of various duties of the directors and remedies available upon breach of such duties.
It has been published by Rachit Garg.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Earlier, in the Companies Act, 1956, duties of directors were not specifically contemplated which created a void in the law. To fill this gap common law principles were applied while also placing reliance on Indian precedents. The Companies Act, 2013 (“the Act”) which replaced the earlier Act has explicit reference to some compliances for a company’s director.
The director of a company as the name suggests is the person responsible for directing and supervising the affairs of a company. The Companies Act, 2013 does not provide for a broad definition of the director but it specifies in Section 2(34) that director is the person appointed by the Board of the company. Further, in Section 2(10) ‘Board of Directors’ is defined as the collective body of directors in a company.
Directors being important dignitaries to a company are obligated to perform a wide range of duties stipulated under Section 166 of the Companies Act which inter alia include duty arising out of the fiduciary relationship with the company and duty to observe due diligence. In case of non-compliance with the duties associated with the position of director, a civil or criminal sanction, as the case may be, is to be imposed. The breach of duties can also be rectified by the shareholders.
Duties of a director
The duties of the directors are a form of responsibility to promote and represent the interests of the company wherever necessary.
Statutory duties of the directors
The statutory duties of a director consist of duties assigned to the directors under the Companies Act. Section 166 of the Companies Act specifically talks about the ‘duties of director’. There are seven distinct duties provided under Section 166 of the Companies Act, 2013 namely,-
Duty to act in accordance with Articles of Association or to say not ultra vires;
Duty to act in good faith toward the company and to promote its object to ultimately benefit its members as a whole;
The directors ought to act towards the best interest of the company in every company dealings. The duty to act in good faith is imposed upon directors so that they do not misuse their position of influence for personal gain or undue advantages over others. Companies’ interests should be above the self-interest of directors. This is also a general duty of the director arising as to the existence of a fiduciary relationship between the company and its directors.
Duty to consider the best interest of the company, its shareholders, employees, communities and the working environment;
Duty to exercise due diligence, care and caution along with reasonable and independent judgement;
A director must always display care and caution in the dealings of the company. As much care is required of the director as a man of ordinary prudence would exercise in a similar situation.
For example- When a shortage of funds is discovered during winding up of the company due to bad investment and misappropriation of funds. Directors will be made liable for the lack of care and diligence.
Duty to avert any kind of conflict of interest within a company;
Duty of not indulging in any nefarious activities of taking undue advantages or gain either for himself or any relative including associates or partners in the company; and
Duty not to delegate his powers to anybody in the form of transferring the office.
What is breach of directors’ duties
As explained in the previous heading, the director owes certain duties towards the company and in case they contravene or goes beyond these duties, it will be considered as a breach of directors’ duties.
Breach of statutory duties
Sub-section 7 of Section 166 provides for directors’ liability in case of breach of the list of duties mentioned from sub-section 1 to sub-section 6. After any contravention to the said duties, the director shall be imposed with a fine of not less than Rs. 1 lakh which may extend to Rs. 5 lakhs.
Breach of administrative duties of the directors
Directors of the companies are associated with a number of administrative works relating to the management of the company on a day to day basis. However, not fulfilling these administrative duties bring them certain liability under the Companies Act. Following are some of the administrative duties of the director of the company and punishment provision for the breach of duties:
Duty to attend board meetings
The powers of the company are exercised by its directors in their meetings held from time to time. Directors are obligated to attend these meetings.
Punishment for breach
If a director fails to attend all the meetings of the Board of Directors held during a period of 12 months with or without seeking leave for being absent from the meetings, he shall be discarded automatically as per Section 167(1)(b) of the Companies Act.
Duties of directors to assist in the inspection
In case of a call for documents or papers by the registrar, directors under Section 207 of the Companies Act are duty bound to produce such documents along with the statement to assist the inspector or registrar with their inspection.
Punishment for breach-
In case the director does not obey the call of the inspector or registrar he shall be punishable with imprisonment of not more than 1 year and fine of not more than one lakh rupees.
Breach of duties of director during winding up of the company
Section 305 of the Companies Act 2013 provides for the duties of directors in voluntary winding up. When a voluntary wind-up is proposed the majority of directors in the meeting of the board owe a duty to declare it. This declaration should be accompanied by an affidavit stating that they have inquired about every affair of the company.
After such inquiry, they opined that the company is either free from debts or it will be able to pay up every debt by soldering its assets. However, if they fail to declare the voluntary winding up or provide any false information pertaining to debts incurred and payable by the company, they will be prone to liability for breach of duties.
Punishment for breach
If the directors make the declaration without any reasonable ground that the company will be able to pay its debt then they shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term between 3 years and 5 years. A fine may also be imposed of 50,000 rupees which may extend to 3 lakhs rupees as specified in sub-section 4 of section 305.
Unlimited liability of directors
Section 286 of the Companies Act provides for unlimited liability of directors in a limited company during winding up. The director shall have to take liability upon themselves as if they were the members of the unlimited company at the commencement of winding up.
Breach of duty arising out of an agency
A company incorporated under the Companies Act is considered a separate legal entity, having its own artificial legal personality. However, it does not have a mind or body of its own. Therefore, when the question is about liability or exercising rights, it has to act through other professional people who are obliged to see through the matters and dealings of the company. These professionals are the directors of the company.
In the landmark English case of Ferguson v. Wilson (1866) LR 2 Ch App 77, while describing a director of the company, it was held by the Court of Appeal in Chancery that “directors are agents of the Company. As the Company cannot act as its own person because it is not a natural person. It has to only act through Directors and thus form a relationship of principal-agent.” This principle is validated by the Indian judiciary from time to time. As recently held by the Delhi High Court in Tristar Consultants vs. Vcustomer Services India Pvt. Ltd., 2007 that “directors of the company are agents to the extent they have been authorised to perform certain acts on the behalf of the company.”
Under the law of agency, an agent has to act within the scope of the agency, if not they will be held accountable for it. Accountability of directors will arise in case of breach of duty assigned under the principle of agency. Generally, a company is solely responsible for the deeds done on its behalf by the director. A new concept of ‘lifting the corporate veil’ has emerged which specifies the liability of the director also on the work done on behalf of the company.
Section 226 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 states that an act done through an agent will have the same legal consequences and it will be enforced in the same manner as it would have been enforced if it was done by the principal himself. Thus, it can be said that for any particular deed completed by the director (agent) on behalf of the company (principal), liability will be cast upon the company and not upon the director. But, this does not mean that directors are absolved f-+9rom all forms of liability.
Breach of duty arising out of trusteeship
A trustee is a person who is vested with the legal right to ownership of assets which he administers for the benefit of another person. According to Section 3 of the Indian Trust Act, 1882, a trustee is one who accepts the confidence of the ‘author of trust’ for the interest of the ‘beneficiary’.
Directors of the company are often regarded as ‘trustees’ because of the power vested in them to administer the assets and to perform duties in the interest of the company rather than doing it for personal gain. A landmark case of York and North Midland Ry. v. Hudson relating to the designation of the directors as ‘trustees” was decided way back in 1853 by the High Court of Chancery where judges opined that, “the directors are persons selected to manage the affairs of the company for the benefit of the shareholders; it is an office of trust, which, if they undertake, it is their duty to perform fully and entirely.”
The principle that directors could be considered as the office of trust is continued across Indian precedents as well. As decided by Supreme Court in the case ofNarayandas Shreeram Somani vs. Sangli Bank Ltd, 1966, directors of the company stand in the trust-based relation, often considered as trusteeship. It is an established rule of equity that he must not place himself in a position which could result in a conflict of interest between their duties and personal interest.
Where the directors work as a trustee to the company, various duties arise in the name of trusteeship. Any breach of said duties will render them liable for breach of trust. In the case of V. S. Ramaswamy Iyer vs. Brahmayya and Co. 1965, it was held by Madras High Court that directors are the trustee and in the issue of directors’ power of applying funds of the company and misusing that power, they could be held liable as trustees. Also, upon their death, the course of action lies against their legal representatives.
Punishment for breach of trust
Directors can be punished for the breach of trust under the Indian Trust Act, 1882 as well as the Companies Act, 2013;
Section 88 of the Indian Trust Act provides for, among others, the director’s accountability for undue advantages derived while being in entrusted position.
Section 340 of the Companies Act inter alia states the liability of delinquent directors during winding up. When a director is found guilty of breach of trust in relation to the company, then upon application of the official liquidator, the Tribunal will direct them to contribute a fair amount to the company’s assets by way of compensation.
Section 407 of the Companies Act provides for punishment for criminal breach of trust. It specifies punishment for the offence as imprisonment of not less than 3 years or a fine or both.
Section 447 states the punishment for fraud is imprisonment of 6 months and may be extended to 10 years. A fine may also be imposed proportional to the amount of fraud.
Essentials of the breach
Breaking fiduciary relation
One of the essentials of a breach of company directors’ duty is not to act with due care and diligence. Directors owe to act as trusted allies in the interest of the company. Any deviance from the said principle would lead to breach of duty.
Illustration- If a director transfers the unused share of the company to a trustee for the sake of obstructing a take-over bid and also an-interest free loan from the company is given to the trustees to enable them to pay for the shares, it will be considered to be the wrongful exercise of fiduciary powers of the director.
A director must exercise his duty in favour of the company and not its employees or anybody else. Thus, directors must remain loyal and faithful to the cause of the company.
Ultra vires act
Directors are to act within the limited scope of companies at, the Memorandum of Association (MoA) & Article of Association (AoA). The directors will be held accountable for all the acts that go beyond the aforesaid limit. This is also known as Ultra Vires acts.
Negligent conduct
When a director fails to exercise due diligence, care and caution they shall be deemed to have acted in negligence and thereafter accountability arises for any resultant injuries. Since the contents of an Article of Association (AoA) cannot go beyond law, therefore, any contract making the directors absolved from their liability for negligence will be considered to be null and void.
Mala fide acts
The directors are considered trustees for the company and its property and they are vested with the legal right to exercise the powers to operate the company. If they exercise these powers with the dishonest intentions they will be held for breach of trust and also be made to pay off the damages accrued via such dishonest conduct. As held in P. K. Nedungadi vs. Malayalee Bank Ltd, 1971.
Liability of the directors for breach of duties
The directors are bound by duties towards the company, so upon any breach, the right to bring about any action will be on the company. However, in certain conditions directors have liability to third parties as well for their breach of duties.
Personal liability of the director
The directors owe the duty to see that shareholders’ funds are used in good faith for promoting the company’s interest only. In case of any contravention to the Article of Association or Memorandum of Association, directors will be held to be personally liable.
In the case ofDr. A Lakshmanaswami Mudaliar vs. L.I.C. 1963, LIC acquired the business of United India Life Insurance Co. Ltd. which was incorporated as a company to carry on the life insurance business. Before the acquisition, donations of 2 Lakhs were made by the directors of the company to a trust formed with the object of promoting insurance education and business knowledge. It was held by the Supreme Court that the donation of 2 lakhs was beyond the object and outside the scope of the Article of Association (AOA) i.e. ultra vires and thus, directors will personally be held liable for that.
Liability to the company
If the directors indulge themselves in any negligent or mala fide acts or they break the trust-based relationship they will be held liable to the company.
In PK. Nedungadi vs. Malayalee Bank Ltd. 1971 the Supreme Court held that where the directors have misappropriated money or property from the company or have committed a breach of trust, they will be required by the court to return or restore such fund or property and also to pay compensation to the company.
Liability to third person
The company is accountable for the contract entered into by third parties. However, if the directors enter into a contract with a third person in their own name hiding the fact that they are doing so in the capacity of director for the company, in that case, they shall be personally liable for any damage caused to the party as a result of such contract. For any omission, they shall be liable the same. Also, compensation may also be granted to the damaged party payable by the director.
In UP Pollution control board vs. Modi distillery & Ors, 1988 where directors along with others were prosecuted for deliberate default in furnishing details about anti-pollution measures deployed by the company. In this case, the Apex Court held that where an offence has been committed by a company, persons in charge of the company’s conduct at the time of commission shall be held responsible. Thus, holding the director’s liability.
Liability for misstatement in prospectus
Section 34 and Section 35 of the Companies Act, 2013 state the criminal and civil liability of directors for misstatement in prospectus respectively. These sections render directors personally liable to the damages of third parties for their breach of duty to remain honest about the company’s affairs.
Section 35 of the Act further states that the person who is a director at the time of issuing a prospectus and also who is named as director of the company in the prospectus shall be responsible for anything in the prospectus which can be misleading in nature and have caused party damage from it.
Remedies
Upon any breach of duty by the director, certain remedies are available in the hands of the company. The company may bring about legal action against such a director. The breach may also be ratified sometimes. There are certain remedies commonly exercised which include:-
Setting aside the contract made out by that director
Obtaining an injunction order for any action taken by the director ultra vires to the limit under which duties are assigned to him
Imposition of penalty
If the directors make any default in compliance with the duty assigned to them, a sum of fine, as may be prescribed, can be imposed on them. Sub-section 7 of Section 166 states that upon any contravention to the provision of this section, the director shall be imposed with a fine of Rs. 1,00,000 which may extend to Rs. 5,00,000.
If the director of the company is found guilty of misappropriating money or property then under Section 340 of the Companies Act, 2013 they will be held liable to pay damages as ordered by the tribunal in the course of winding up. A compensation amount will also be imposed on them.
Legal action of the company against such directors
A company has locus standi to bring about legal action upon breach of the company’s directors’ duties. In Rajeev Saumitra vs. Neetu Singh, 2016 Delhi High Court held that directors are liable to pay accordingly for all undue advantages going beyond duties provided under Section 166 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Ratification of breach by Shareholders
Ratification is the process in which any irregularities in conduct or acts or any omission of the director is brought to conformity with the law. A bench of Security Appellate Tribunal Mumbai, in the case of Terrascope Ventures Ltd. V. SEBI, 2022 held that ‘acts or deeds done by a director in breach of his duties become valid once it is ratified by the company’.
However, not all the breaches of duty of directors can be ratified by the shareholders. Committing fraud with malice intention can not be ratified as these are offences of criminal nature and thus no margin is left for correcting it.
Remedies under Indian Trust Act
Section 88 of the Indian Trust Act, 1882 states the remedy in the situation of unwarranted pecuniary advantage by the director of the company. When the director of a company or any other person who is bound by fiduciary relationship to act in good faith and in the interest of another person, acts in contravention of the same to derive pecuniary advantage, he shall be held accountable for the advantages so derived.
Section 88 of the trust act specifically makes the director of the company liable for unwarranted advantages. Also, directors of the company stand on the footing of fiduciary relations with the company itself. They are obliged to act towards the paramount interest of the company.
In Sangramsinh P. Gaekwad and others vs. Shantadevi P. Gaekwad (Dead), through LRS. and Others (2005) 11 SCC 314, the Supreme Court, in this case, has observed that “under Section 88 of the Trusts Act, a person bound in fiduciary character is required to protect the interests of other persons and one is bound to protect the interests of the other as between two persons, if the former was availing of such a relationship and makes a pecuniary gain for himself, section 88 would be attracted. When a person makes a pecuniary gain by way of a transaction, the cestui que trust created thereunder must be restored.”
Conclusion
Directors of the company are bound to the company and the rules of the Article of Association. All the actions of the directors should be to protect and promote the interest of the company in good faith. They can act within the purview of objects specified in the Memorandum of Association and regulations of the Article of Association (AoA). Any deviance with these would lead to a breach of duty for which directors shall be personally liable. Directors are often regarded as agents and trustees of the company owing to their resemblance with them, thus, making them vulnerable to a breach of duties arising out of agency and trusteeship.
Considering these a director must remain honest with the company and follow the interest of the company above anything.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Can a director sue another director?
The duty of the director is towards the company therefore a company is the only entity to sue him for any breach. However, other directors or shareholders can initiate proceedings only when they are in a representative character.
Can a shareholder take action against the director for breach of its duties?
By means of amending the Article of Association (AoA), shareholders can restrict the powers of directors but it does have a retrospective effect. If the shareholders are dissatisfied with what directors do they have to either remove them as per the regulation or rectify their breach.
What are the possible sanctions which might be imposed for a breach of the director’s duties?
(i) Damages
(ii) Injunction
(iii) Reversing the contract (iv) Restoration of property
Are directors trustees for the individual shareholder along with the company?
No. In the landmark English case of Percival vs. Wright, 1902 it was held by the High Court of Justice that directors are not trustees for individual shareholders. They do owe some duty towards the company as a part of the fiduciary relationship but not to the shareholders.
Is a director of the company considered an agent?
Technically, directors are not agents of the company under any statute. But, seeing their resemblance as both director and agent act for others and they are bound by fiduciary relation to act with due diligence and care, directors are being held as agents in many cases.
Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:
A contract is defined as an agreement made enforceable by law between two or more persons, creating and defining obligations between the parties under Section 2(h) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. According to Sir F. Pollock, “every agreement and promise enforceable by law is a contract”. Here it shows that a contract has two basic elements:
An agreement
Enforceable by law.
For example, if there is a contract between P and Q that P will make a drawing for Q and Q will pay Rs. 550 to P, this agreement becomes a contract. And on account of the agreement, Q is entitled to the act done. The process to form a contract plays an essential role throughout, and the process has some basic elements such as an offer, followed by acceptance, promise, consideration, and agreement, enforceable by law, thereby forming a contract.
Elements of contract
The elements that form a contract are:
Offer:Section 2(a) of Indian Contract Act 1872, defines proposal as,“when one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to hold back from doing anything, with the view to obtain the assent of that other to such act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal.
Acceptance: Section 2(b) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 defines acceptance as, giving of assent to the proposal that is made by the offeror. This acceptance showcases that the proposal made is accepted.
Promise: When someone expresses his willingness to do or not to do something, he makes a proposal. When the promisee accepts that proposal, the proposal becomes a promise.
Agreement: The mutual obligation created between private parties that is enforceable by law are called agreements.
Contract: Section 2(h) of the Indian Contract Act of 1872, defines a contract as an agreement enforceable by law.
Role of acceptance
After an offer is made, the next important and essential element in the formation of a contract is acceptance. It has been remarked that it is acceptance alone that converts an offer into a promise, thus creating mutual obligations and rights between the contracting parties. In ordinary language, it means to signify the unconditional assent to the proposal by the acceptor.
According to Section 2(h) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the definition of acceptance states that “when the person to whom the proposal is made signifies his assent thereto, the proposal is said to be accepted”. A proposal, when accepted, becomes a promise and creates mutual obligations and rights between the contracting parties.
Types of acceptance
● Expressed acceptance: If the acceptance is written or oral.
● Implied acceptance: If the acceptance is shown by conduct
● Conditional acceptance: When a person to whom an offer has been made tells the offeror that he or she is ready to accept the offer with certain changes made to the condition of the offer.
For example, A offers to sell his watch to B over E-mail. B responds to that E-mail by saying that he accepts the offer to buy; it is a form of expressed acceptance. Whereas, if a customer orders food, the restaurant owner is obligated to serve the food, and the customer is required to pay the prices listed on the menu for it. Hence, an implied contract is created.
Legal rules relating to acceptance
In order to create a valid acceptance, there are some legal rules that must be followed:
Acceptance must be absolute and unqualified
The first and foremost essential of a valid acceptance is that it must be absolute and unconditional as well. According to Section 7 of the Act of 1872, to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified. If there is a variation in the acceptance, the acceptance will not be considered acceptance but a counter-proposal itself, and there is no contract unless the counter proposal is accepted by the original proposer.
For example, A offered to purchase a property on certain terms, saying that possession would be given before March 5. B agreed to the conditions but said he would give possession on the 1st of April; it was not held to be an acceptance of A’s offer.
In Hyde v. Wrench (1840), the defendant offered to sell the plaintiff his farm for $1,000. However, the plaintiff only agreed to pay $950. Later,when he agreed to pay $1,000 for the farm, the defendant refused to sell it. The plaintiff sued the defendant for the same, thereby approaching the court of law. It was observed that the plaintiff’s offer of $950 was a counteroffer, which rendered the initial offer invalid. Thus, the plaintiff’s lawsuit was dismissed.
Communication of acceptance must be made by the acceptor or his agent
A valid communication of acceptance must be made either by the offeror himself or his authorised agent. Any communication of acceptance by any other person will not be valid.
InPowell vs. Lee (1908), the board of managers of a school passed a resolution to select the plaintiff for the post of headmaster, but the decision about his selection was not told or communicated to him. One of the managers informed him of the results of the selection, but later on, the board of managers rescinded their decision, and consequently, the plaintiff was not selected as the headmaster. The King’s Bench Division held that no contract was formed because the communication of acceptance to be valid must be made by the offeree himself or an authorised agent and not by any unauthorised person.
The acceptance must be expressed in some usual and reasonable manner
According to Section 7 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the acceptance must be expressed in some reasonable and usual manner, unless the proposal is made in the manner in which it is to be accepted. If the proposal prescribes a manner in which it should be or is meant to be accepted, and if the acceptance is not made in such a manner, then the proposer may, within a reasonable time after the acceptance is communicated to him, insist that his proposal be accepted in the manner it was meant and not otherwise. If he fails to do so in the prescribed manner,he accepts the acceptance.
For example, if P offers Q to sell his watch for Rs. 500, Q may accept this offer orally, by sending a telegram, or by sending a letter. But if P says in the offer that acceptance is to be communicated only with a telegram text, then Q should accept it by sending the telegram text. And if Q sends a postcard for acceptance, then P can object to it and insist that his offer is only accepted via telegram. But if P does not insist upon it, then he is accepting the acceptance as actually communicated.
If the manner of acceptance is not prescribed, the acceptance must be expressed in some reasonable and usual manner. The credibility of being reasonable will depend on the circumstances of the particular case and the nature of the proposal. If the proposal is made via text, then the acceptance is also expected by the text, but if the proposal is made orally, an oral acceptance is accepted.
Acceptance of an offer is the acceptance of all its terms
If the terms of an offer are not apparent on the face of it and no reasonable precaution is taken to draw the attention of the acceptor, then those terms will not be considered binding. For example, if the attention of the passenger was not drawn to the clause saying that “the bus company will not be liable for any loss or damage of the luggage”, then it will be held that in the suit for the loss of luggage, the bus authority is not liable.
Thus, in the case of Harris vs. Chicago Great Western Ry. Co. (1952), Harris deposited luggage at the cloak room and received a ticket on which it was printed that, “left subject to the condition on the other side. This ticket will be given up when the luggage is taken away”. On the back of the ticket was a condition that the company would not be responsible for loss of or injury to the luggage beyond the value of $5 unless extra payment was made. He knew that there were conditions on the back but didn’t read them, and later on the luggage was lost. It was held that the company was not liable as the extra payment had not been made.
A mere answer to a question can neither constitute an offer nor acceptance
A mere answer to a question will not constitute either an offer or acceptance. There must be an expression of willingness to be bound.
Acceptance may be expressed or implied
An acceptance of an offer may be expressed or implied. Where an offer is accepted by words, written or oral, the acceptance is called express. When an offer is accepted by conduct, the same is termed as implied.
Mental acceptance is no acceptance
According to Section 2(b), for an acceptance to be binding, it must be communicated. An intention to accept or even a mental decision to accept a proposal does not give rise to a contract. There must be some external expression of speech, writing, or other act. Even if the offeree has made up his mind about a final acceptance, the agreement is still not complete. There should be an eternal manifestation of assent in the words spoken or act done by the communication of acceptance to the offeror.
Acceptance of the general offer need not to be communicated
In order to form a legit and valid contract, acceptance of the terms of the offer by the person to whom it was made must be communicated to the person making the offer. An acceptance not communicated to the person making the offer will not bind him to the contract. But in the case of general offers, formal communication of acceptance is not necessary. Fulfilment of the conditions given about the offer is sufficient.
Revocation of acceptance
A proposal may be withdrawn at any time up to the completion of the communication of its acceptance as against the proposer, but not after that. Before the acceptance has been fully communicated to the acceptor, it has the potential to be revoked. Let us take, for example, that A offers to sell him his land to B. B responds to the same by post. Before or at the time B posts his letter of acceptance, A may withdraw his offer. But the same cannot be done after the post has been reached. Similarly, B may withdraw his consent at any time before the post reaches A.
There are two conditions by which acceptance of an offer can be revoked are as following-
(i) By lapse of time- If acceptance is not made, a proposal can be understood to be revoked owing to a discharge of time.
(ii) By notice- An offer may be revoked by communication of notice to the offeree by the offeror before the communication of acceptance is completed.
Modes of acceptance
There are two modes by which acceptance can happen, they are following as –
Communication of acceptance by act- It includes the communication via words, which could be written/oral. So will include communication through calls, mails, text etc.
Communication of acceptance by conduct- The offeree can convey the acceptance through some action of his/his conduct. For example, when you are boarding a bus, you are expected to pay the fare via conduct.
Conclusion
Acceptance is considered one of the foremost steps in the process of contract formation. The need for knowing what acceptance signifies and what are the modes involved in the same, this article has tried to bring out the same by informing basics about acceptance to the readers. In order to understand the concept of contract, acceptance and its mode as per the Indian Contract Act, 1872, need prime attention.
Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:
This article is written by Nishka Kamath, a graduate of Nalanda Law College, University of Mumbai. It is an endeavour to describe custodial law in India in great detail. It also has an overview of the history of custodial rape and anti-rape law movements, the grounds for an increase in rape cases, the top cases that brought in a reformation in laws relating to custodial rape, the traumatising effect of rape (commonly known as PTSD) on the victim, and the challenges in reporting custodial rape cases, inter alia. It also has a brief discussion on how we, as a society, can help curb the issue of custodial rape or rape in general.
It has been published by Rachit Garg.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Please note: in moments of emergency, like an occurrence of rape, there are several 24 / 7 helplines, one of them is the AKS Foundation. One can always contact them on +91 8793 088 814 or email them at [email protected] for assistance in matters of sexual violence. It is always advisable to seek help and raise your voice in the event of such unfortunate events. Always remember, one must not keep mum, instead, they should come speak so the wrongdoers are punished and the victim gets the justice they deserve.
Rape, a four-letter word, has been known to ruin several lives. It not only ravages the victim’s body and mental serenity but also plunges them into severe emotional trauma, reducing them to a living corpse. It can be referred to as one of the most barbaric acts, violating not only an individual’s body but also their integrity, honor, and pride. Rape is a demon that inflicts long-lasting negative effects on the victim, both mentally and physically. Additionally, the victim’s family undergoes such a traumatic experience. It represents a blatant violation of human rights and goes against Article 21 (right to life) of the Constitution of India.
Sadly, even after India became free from the 200 year long oppression of the British Empire and even after seventy three years of independence, our nation has not escaped the clutches of a heinous crime like that of rape. It is a bitter truth that even in the 21st century, the victims of such atrocious activities are blamed, and society goes on victim blaming the individual by raising questions like:
“Why was she dressed up like that?”
“Why was she out with her friends past midnight?”,
“Why did she come home late?”
And the list goes on and on. As individuals belonging to the same society, it is high time we learn to raise our voice against such crimes and start understanding the plight of the person who has undergone such a traumatic experience.
The term ‘rape’ has been derived from the Latin word ‘rapio’ which means ‘to seize’. Thus, the offence of ape was said to be the ravishment of the woman and a forcible seizure of her as an individual. Rape is one of the most common and underreported crimes against women in India. We have come across several types of rapes, like “landlord rape”, “caste rape”, “rape by person in authority”, “class rape”, etc. Further, there are some classes of rape that are yet to gain full recognition in Indian society, namely, “martial rape”, and “rape of sex workers”.Furthermore, there is one category of rape known as custodial rape, which came into existence through an amendment in Section 375 and Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, after the incident in 1980, which will be discussed in the following passages.While it is already tough to prosecute and punish an individual accused of committing rape, it becomes 10 times more challenging to penalise the accused when it comes to custodial rape. You may wonder why. The answer to that is because these charges are raised against public officers like the superintendent of a jail, the officer of a remand home, mental health care institutions, police personnel, or other such officers when the victim is in their custody. All the important pointers necessary to answer the aforementioned question are covered in this article. Further, in this article, the author has tried to shed light on all the important aspects of custodial rape, along with its history, landmark judgements, and preventive measures.
Custodial rape : an overview
Meaning of custody : a general perspective
In general terms, the word ‘custody’ can be defined as the legal right to take care of something or someone, especially children. It can be said to be the temporary possession or care of somebody’s property or assets; however, in the legal sense, it can be defined as the state of being imprisoned or detained, usually when their case is pending in trial.
An individual can be said to be in ‘custody’ when he/she is under the control, care, and supervision of another person or institution, and such a person having the authority is referred to as a custodian. Generally, the custodian has an absolute or high degree of control over the individual, this includes his/her-
Mobility,
Liberty,
Food and water,
Contact with the outside world and the like.
Further, the most common instances of custody are detention by the state, through any police, army, or security forces, which may be at police stations, lockups, prisons, or interrogation centres. Furthermore, the concept of ‘custody’ is also applicable to hospitals (both government and private), mental health care institutions, shelter homes, and juvenile houses. Moreover, a point must be noted that, it was in 1983 that importance was given to the term ‘custody’ and its scope was widened.
Now that we have read about custody, let’s dive deep into the actual topic at hand, i.e., custodial rape.
Essential ingredients of rape : a general view
The essence of the offence of rape as defined under Section 375 of the IPC is sexual intercourse by a male with a female against her will and without obtaining prior consent under any of the following conditions:
Against her will,
Without obtaining her consent,
With obtaining consent by force by putting her or another individual in whom she is interested in the fear of causing death, hurt or injury,
With obtaining consent under the pretext or misconception that the man is her husband,
With obtaining consent by reason of unsoundness of mind or when she is heavily intoxicated or under the influence of any drugs or substance,
Women under the age of 18, i.e., minor with or without her consent,
When a woman is not able to give or communicate consent.
Thus, any activity belonging to the aforementioned seven categories will amount to rape.
What is custodial rape
As discussed above, a person is said to be in custody, when he/she is under the supervision or custody of a person or an institution who is said to be the custodian. This custodian has the absolute power of control over the individual, and this relationship of control and dependence imposes a strong duty of care and protection on the custodian. However, at times, these officials take undue advantage of their power and persuade female inmates to engage in sexual activity with them, this activity is termed as ‘custodial rape’. Custodial rape is a serious crime and a grave violation where the aggressor not only takes undue advantage of his authority to control the individual, usually a woman, but also violates the individual’s bodily integrity and the duty to care for and protect the citizens and their rights.
Further, the concept of custodial rape is applicable to the following personnel:
The superintendent of a jail,
The superintendent of a remand home,
Management or staff of a hospital (government and private),
Management or staff of any mental health care institutions,
Management or staff of any rehabilitation centre,
Officers, Management or staff or any juvenile or shelter home,
Any other place of custody established by law.
History of custodial rape
Origin of custodial rape
In the late 1970s and early 1980s, with the declaration of a national emergency, powers were entrusted to the states, which is why officials started abusing their powers and torturing people. Further, many incidents of custodial rapes, too, came to light; here, police officers or public servants tortured individuals in the form of custodial rape. In such times of difficulty, officials used rape as an instrument to oppress the prisoners, and unfortunately, this crime still prevails in our nation.
During the period of national emergency between 1975-77, all the powers were vested in the state, which is why the public servants were not scared of any repercussions as such, as they were aware that they were in authority, thus having power in their own hands, and if evidence is found against them, they can safely erase or destroy it because it was within the premises. Several cases of custodial rape took place during this period, which are discussed in detail below. This period made it crystal clear that state power could be used to transgress or disregard the personal liberty of citizens, and these incidents awakened the conscience of society and the judiciary.
With all the campaigns and political pressure, there was an amendment in rape laws in 1983. However, the amendment was not very effective, thus, in 2013, significant changes were carried out in CrPC, IPC, and IEA which is mentioned below.
Top cases that brought changes in custodial rape laws
Between the 1970s and 1990s, there were three cases of custodial rape that were widely spread and gained political affluence too. The three cases were as follows:
Mathura rape case in Maharashtra in 1974,
Rameeza Bee rape case in Andhra Pradesh in 1978, and
Maya Tyagi rape case Uttar Pradesh in 1980.
Protests were carried out against such atrocities by uniformed officials against the local public, and the Indian Government had to take the necessary actions to address the issue. The same is discussed in detail in the upcoming passages.
Beginning of the anti- rape campaign
Women’s rights movement received national attention when an anti-rape movement was carried out in 1980. Civil liberties organisations, after the end of the emergency period, gave special attention in matters relating to:
Rape of women in police custody,
Rape of poor at large, and
Sexual molestation of tribal women
by the State Reserve Police (SRP), the Central Reserve Police (CRP), and other authorities of the Parliament.
There was a huge coverage by the media on the statements of victims of sexual crimes, and many individuals started to question the authority and power entrusted to police and state officials. Further, when, in 1980, the Supreme Court announced its verdict in the Mathura rape case, there was a national outcry. The police defended themselves by stating that she already had a boyfriend, and, hence, was a girl of immoral virtue, therefore she could not be raped. Sadly, the Apex Court accepted such an opinion. Then, there were several lawyers, namely, Ragunath Kelkar, Upendra Bakshi, Vasudha Dhagamwar, and Lotika Sarkar, who wrote an open letter questioning the validity and logic behind such a judgement. Via this letter, several feminist groups raised their voices against this heinous crime of rape and made efforts to bring it to light. The Forum Against Rape, which was later renamed as the Forum Against Oppression of Women, was one such feminist group that started a campaign to reopen the case. The main motive for starting such a campaign was that the Mathura rape case be tried again and that amends be made to the laws relating to rape. Furthermore, as per some reports, the police officials, too, carried out protests across the country.
Grounds for increase in rape cases in India
There are several reasons that have caused an increase in cases related to custodial rape and judicial violence in our country. Some of them are as follows:
Absence of stringent laws
In order to curb the issue of custodial rape and violence, it is important that strict and mandatory laws be enacted and passed. In India, custodial rape is criminalised, but custodial violence is not, which has been used as an advantage by those in power for several decades now.
No solid prison reforms
In India, prisoners are to date affected by poor prison conditions, overcrowding, an acute manpower shortage, and minimal safety against harm in prisons. Additionally, the entire system is opaque, leaving less room for transparency.
Work pressure
The police work under extreme pressure, and in order to reach a quick solution like obtaining evidence or making the individual confess something, they resort to violence.
Social factor
By following the approach of “eye for an eye“, the individuals in power choose to use violence and force against the ones accused of a crime to obtain information.
Sometimes there can be a lack of understanding between two individuals, and at times, people are under the false notion that women never directly say yes, they think they need to be forced to have an intercourse, which is definitely not true. Men, at times, misinterpret the message a woman has to convey, which is why rape is still prevalent in our society.
Lack of sex education
Even in the 21st century, a basic prerequisite like that of sex education is still missing among the youth and society, as a result of which crimes like custodial rapes and sexual violence are still spreading at an alarming rate.
Effect of media and cinema
Media and cinema play a vital role in the ever increasing cases of rape and custodial rape, as many a times, women are simply objectified and portrayed as objects instead of human beings. Further, there are several uncensored vulgar dialogues, shows, and songs in the cinema that provoke individuals to commit such crimes.
Other factors
Apart from the aforementioned reasons, the other rationales for custodial rapes could be as follows:
Sexual weakness,
Dominance of male in the society,
Sadism, etc.
Several male officers have a tendency to get enticed by prisoners belonging to the opposite gender, and to satisfy their animal lust, they force women to have intercourse or commit rape when they are in their custody. At times, a public servant is also witnessed obtaining consent for engaging in sexual activity with the victim through his power or position.
PTSD in rape victims
Another horrible effect of undergoing such a barbaric activity is the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). PTSD can be defined as a psychological disorder that can occur in people who have usually witnessed traumatic experiences, like:
Natural disaster,
A serious accident,
A terrorist act,
Any war or fights,
Incident of rape, or
Other violent personal assault.
People who have gone through such traumatic experiences have intense, disturbing thoughts and feelings that are related to those incidents that have a long lasting, traumatic effect on the victim even after the incident has come to an end. They may also encounter the event through flashbacks or nightmares. Such victims may also have feelings of sadness, fear, anger, etc., at times, they may also feel detached or estranged from other individuals in society.
Further, any individual who has undergone such a traumatic experience may refrain from engaging in any activity with people or situations that remind them of that event. They may also have quite a strong negative reaction to something as ordinary as a loud noise or an accidental touch.
Punishment for custodial rape
Legislations and penalty on custodial rape
Section 376 of the IPC
Section 376 of the IPC states that any individual who commits rape shall be penalised with rigorous imprisonment of either description or a term not less than 10 years, which can be extended to imprisonment for life. Section 375 defines rape, whereas Section 376 describes punishment for rape. Moreover, Section 376C of the IPC defines “sexual intercourse by a person in authority.” It is a new category of sexual offences that was added after an amendment.
The Section states that any individual who is in position or authority or in a “fiduciary” relationship or is a public servant, superintendent or manager of a jail, remand home or other place of custodianship established by or under any law for the time being in force, or a women’s or children’s institution; or on the management of a hospital or being on the staff of a hospital, abuses such a position or fiduciary relationship and tries to persuade or convince a woman who is in his custody or for whom he is in charge of, to engage in any sexual activity or have sexual intercourse with him will be penalised. The penalty for the same will be rigorous imprisonment for a period not less than 5 years and extendable for ten years, along with a fine.
Section 197 of the CrPC
An amendment was brought to Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, that talks about prosecuting judges and public servants. The amendment to Section 197(1) was added to ensure that a prior sanction from the appropriate government for prosecuting a public servant for any offence related to sexual abuse is not a necessity. This amendment was carried for the obvious reason that Section 197 highly favours the protection of public servants from malicious prosecutions for any activity conducted in the course of their employment. No public officer can argue that sexual activity was conducted to discharge public duties, therefore, the modification was made to sanction penalising public servants for any offence like rape or other forms of sexual abuse.
Punishment for repeated offender
According to Section 376E of the IPC, any person who has been formerly convicted of an offence punishable under Section 376 or Section 376A or Section 376D (i.e., committing rape, causing death or vegetative state in the course of committing rape, or committing gang-rape) and is convicted for an offence under the aforementioned sections for the second time, a death sentence can be either pronounced or a sentence of life imprisonment can be ordered against him. However, a point must be made that a previous conviction must be present, followed by the next conviction, to sentence the offender.
Case laws on custodial rape
Tuka Ram and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra (1978)
On March 26, 1972, a young Harijan girl named Mathura was brutally raped by two police officials on the premises of Desaiganj Police Station in Chandrapur district of Maharashtra. This case led to an amendment to the rape law in India via the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983.
Facts
A young girl named Mathura, nearly aged between 14-16 years, was an orphan belonging to an adivasi tribe. She lived with her brother Gama and they both worked as labourers to earn their livelihood.
During her employment, she developed some intimate relationships with the son of Nushi’s sister, Ashok. The couple decided to get married, which is why she eloped with him.
Now, considering her elopement, Gama filed a case against Nunshi, her husband Laxman and their son Ashok claiming that she had been kidnapped by the above individuals.
On March 26, 1972, all the concerned individuals in default, including the above ones and their relatives, were summoned before the police station. After recording the statements, each of the accused started to walk out of the station. The activity occurred at 10:30 p.m.
However, a constable named Ganapat asked Mathura to stay back. Sadly, after shutting the doors and turning off the lights, he took her inside a washroom and raped her. This teenage girl tried hard to resist and escape his clutches, but to no avail. Unfortunately, after Ganpat, another police officer named Tukaram entered the washroom and fondled her private parts. He even tried to commit rape but did not succeed as he was under the influence of alcohol. Tukaram was the head constable of the station at the time.
Mathura was then sent back home and after returning home she narrated this incident to her family. On being medically examined, the doctor affirmed that Mathura was aged between 14 to 16 years and her hymen reveleaded old ruptures but there was no bodily harm.
On 27th March, after being examined by Dr. Shastrakar, it was advised that an FIR be lodged. Very soon an FIR was filed against the officials.
Judgement
Unfortunately, Mathura had to fight a long battle to get justice; however, at the end, the Apex Court succeeded in giving her the righteous treatment she deserved. Let’s have a look at each of the Court’s judgements.
Judgement of the Session Court
Sadly, the judge of the session court considered this barbarous activity to fall under the category of “consensual sexual intercourse”, as according to him, the girl was habituated to having intercourse. The judge further affirmed that both the accused were not guilty of committing rape, as she did not make any sound at the time of the incident as she was scared of Ashok and Nushi.
Judgement of the Bombay High Court
Fortunately, the Bombay High Court overturned the order of the session court judge and stated that it is highly unlikely that Mathura would make such advances when she, along with her brother, had just filed a case at the same police station. Further, the Court stated that, as the police officials were in a position of authority, the poor girl must have deduced that any resistance to the activity could pose a threat to her brother.
The Bombay High Court held that the accused were guilty of the offence, and sentenced Tukaram to one year of imprisonment and Ganpat to five years of imprisonment.
Judgement of the Supreme Court
The appellants contended for special leave, and the Supreme Court sadly overturned the High Court’s judgement. The accused were set free, and the Court agreed with the decision of the session court and held that this case was a case of consensual sexual intercourse. Further, the Supreme Court made a comment that as “no marks of injury” were found on the victim’s body, it could be stated that “there was no battle on her part” and since she did not “raise any alarm for help” she gave her consent for the sexual activity.
Reforms brought by the case
This case brought up a lot of awakening in society, and several protests were carried on for enacting a law that was more considerate towards the sentiments of the victims and protecting their human rights and dignity. This case led to the passing of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983. This Act also brought major changes to Section 114(A) of the Indian Evidence Act. Further, Section 376 of the IPC was also amended, making custodial rape a punishable offence. Moreover, the Amendment prohibited the publication of the identities of the victims of rape, and it also stated that such proceedings must be carried out as in-camera proceedings.
Sheo Kumar v. State of U.P. and Ors. (1988)
Facts of the case
In this case, Maya Tyagi, a six months pregnant lady was pulled out of the car, beaten black and blue and was forcefully stripped.
Maya Tyagi, along with her husband, Ishwar Singh Tyagi, and two of his friends were travelling to attend a wedding, however, one of the car tires got punctured. On reaching a crossing, the driver went ahead to get the tire changed and Maya’s husband and his friends headed towards the market (bazaar), whereas Maya was seated in the car.
Meanwhile, a man in plain dress stopped by and misbehaved with Maya Tyagi. She told him he had no manners whatsoever, meanwhile, her husband reached there and started abusing the man and threw him down. The person got up and left the place after which someone informed them that that person named Narendra Singh was the superintendent of the place.
When the driver came back, all of them wanted to leave the place as they were frightened, but the car couldn’t start. So, Maya’s husband and his friends started to push the car with all their might.
However, when the car had moved 4 to 6 paces, an army of around 10-11 policemen, including Narendra Singh, reached the place.
The S.I. came from behind and fired on Ishwar Tyagi and his two friends, also attacking them with sticks (dandas). Further, four police officials pulled Maya Tyagi out of the car and started assaulting her. They even tore her blouse, petticoat, and saree, thus stripping her to nothing.
When someone offered her a towel and a Tahmed she was not permitted to take it and cover her. She was also assaulted with lathis and slippers when she tried to cover her body.
Later, she was paraded naked from the place of incident to the police station and was asked to take a round in the same condition around the police station.
After that she was placed in a room with iron bars. Sadly, three sub-inspectors and three constables came there and raped her in turns. As a result, she started to bleed. Further, an inspector visited the room and assaulted her with a cane and pulled her breasts and inserted a stick (danda) in her vagina.
A report was lodged under Sections 399, 402 and 307 of the IPC and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act.
Judgment
The Allahabad High Court held the accused guilty of committing rape. Three police officials were given the death penalty but were later overturned and sentenced to life imprisonment. The other police officials were punished with either imprisonment for up to seven years, three years, two years, or one year, according to the gravity of the act committed.
Reforms brought by the case
This case led to a legal reform that marked the difference between custodial rape and rape.
Maya Tyagi, the victim in the case, was supported by the then Prime Minister, Chaudhary Charan Singh, and several women’s organisations and political parties carried out protests against this mishap and atrocities by public officials.
Further, a Parliamentary debate was held for the ever-increasing rates in rape cases.
Smt. Rameeza Bee v. D Armugam (1978)
This case stirred up extreme agitation in Hyderabad and other parts of Andhra Pradesh. Also, riots in the streets of Hyderabad were carried on. Here, a woman was allegedly raped by police constables, and her husband was killed because he raised his voice against such a barbaric act. Moreover, 18 police stations were burned down in protest, and 26 people lost their lives in police shootings. A curfew had to be imposed to control the riots.
Facts of the case
On March 29,1978, Rameeza Bee, a working class woman, aged about 26 years along with her husband, Ahmed Husain, a rickshaw puller by profession were returning from a late night movie show.
To answer nature’s call, her husband strapped out of the auto rickshaw, whereas, Rameeza remained seated inside the vehicle.
Two constables, named Rao and Hussain, on watching her sitting alone, caught hold of her and dragged her to the Nallakunta police station. She kept protesting and saying her husband was with her and that she was waiting for her husband but the constables refused to pay heed to her cry.
Meanwhile, Rameeza Bee was illegally detained and raped by police officials on that night.
She was led into a room by sub inspector T. Surender Singh, who then locked the door of the room from the inside and asked her to remove her burqa. When she refused to do so, the inspector removed her burqa, her saree, petticoat and blouse.
Rameeza tried to cover her body with her arms but the officer burnt her left arm near the elbow joint with a cigarette.
A blanket was spread on the floor and the inspector and three policemen took turns to perform such a gruesome act.
In the day, two policemen with Rameeza visited her residence to summon her husband to the station. Meanwhile, Rameeza narrated the whole incident to him and he protested against the assault. He was beaten mercilessly, to that extent that he suffered injuries in his kidney and lost his life.
Judgement
There were a series of dissenting judgements given initially, but then a committee was set up that gave a just judgement. Let’s have a look at these judgments.
Judgement by Justice Mukhtadar Commission
The then Chief Minister, considering the violent protests across the state, was forced to institute a Commission of Inquiry, named the Justice Muktadar Commission, to inquire into and dig deep into the rape and murder cases of the victims. During the proceedings, the police tried their level best to fend for their fellow policemen by questioning Rameeza Bee’s character. They submitted evidence claiming that she was married several times and that her marriage with the deceased was invalid. They also asserted that Rameeza Bee was morally cohabiting with him and that she was a sex worker who was arrested in that context.
However, the Commission found the policemen guilty of rape and murder and implied that they be prosecuted for their wrongdoings.
Transfer of the case by the Supreme Court
The Supreme Court had transferred the case to the Karnataka High Court on the grounds that Justice K. A. Muktadar was already functioning as a Commission of Inquiry and that a fair trial could not be executed by a junior judge within the same state.
Judgement by Karnataka Session Court
The case was transferred to a District Court in Raichur, led by Session Judge K. B. Navadgi, for a just and fair trial. The Court reached the conclusion that Rameeza Bee was not a victim of rape. It further went on to claim that she was a “common prostitute” and her husband was a “pimp“. Sadly, the Court also said that Ahmed Hussain died a natural death as he took a cold shower after coming back from the Nallakunta police station and that he slipped on the floor, sustained injuries, and died before he was taken to the hospital.
Final verdict
The trial of the policemen was conducted in the Session Court of Karnataka. The police officers were acquitted in the case on the ground that the evidence submitted before the Commission was not admissible.
Reforms brought in by the case
In 1980, a request was made to the Law Commission to conduct research on the matter and suggest recommendations in the 84th Report, and a Bill was presented in Parliament in 1982.
State of Maharashtra v. C. K. Jain (1990)
Facts of the case
In this case, a sub-inspector named Handraprakash Kewalchand Jain was accused of committing rape on a young, newly married girl who was aged between 19 to 20 years.
The young couple were staying in a hotel room. The police officer, on the pretext that the couple revealed their false identity, asked them to accompany them to the police station, and on reaching the police station, the officer separated the couple.
The police officer then took the girl to the first floor and started passing flirtatious comments on her, and when she refused to respond to them, he slapped her. He also went on demanding that she should lie about her age being 15 years to book charges against her husband, and when she refused to act as ordered, the officer threatened her, saying the consequences of such a denial would be dire. Her husband was kept in the other room, where he was beaten black and blue.
In the morning, the parents of the couples were asked to visit the police station but when the couple claimed that they got married, their parents refused to accept them and left the police station in a moment of fury.
The sub inspector then registered charges against the husband under Section 110 read with Section 117 of the Bombay Police Act,1951, and he was sent to court on his arrest. The case was filed under the allegations that he was witnessed misbehaving on a public street and was uttering filthy abuses in front of a lodge in Gujarat.
After putting Mohammad Shaft behind the bars, the sub inspector sent a police officer to accompany the victim to allot a room to her at a hotel. Sadly, the sub inspector wanted to satisfy his animal lust and visited the same hotel and started knocking on the door. The girl, assuming it was her husband, opened the door.
The sub inspector entered the room and asked the girl to disrobe, and when she refused, he threatened her with dire consequences. He then pushed her on the cot and forcibly undressed her, and had sexual intercourse with her. He said he would now send her husband back; however, after 30 minutes to satisfy his lust again, he returned and forcibly entered the room and raped her again.
When her husband was back, she told him the whole story. Infuriated by the incident, her husband went back to the police station and informed police inspector Pathak about the same, who then informed his superiors of the incident.
The victim and the sub inspector were sent for conducting a medical examination. A case was filed under Section 376 of the IPC.
Judgment
The case went from session court to high court to the Supreme Court. Let us have a look at each of the court’s judgements.
Judgement of the Nagpur Session Court
The Nagpur Session Court sentenced the sub inspector to 5 years of imprisonment with an additional fine of ₹1000.
Judgement of the Bombay High Court
However, the Bombay High Court set aside the order and acquitted the inspector. The case was then appealed to the Supreme Court.
Judgement of the Supreme Court
The Hon’ble Supreme Court upheld the Session Court’s judgement and sentenced the accused to imprisonment for five years and a fine of ₹1000. The Court also stated that there must be no room for leniency in cases where the crime is committed by a person in uniform and that they should be penalised stringently.
P. Rajakumar v. The Additional Director General (2014)
Facts of the case
In this recent case, the daughter of the victim filed a writ petition.
Here, the victim, Chandra was brutally tortured by 7 male police officials while she was in police custody.
The victim came from an economically backward section of society. In order to earn her daily bread and butter she used to wash dishes in a hotel.
Chandra used to live in a rented apartment that belonged to Leelavathi.
One fine day, Chandra was arrested by the police officials of Udumalpet Police Station, Tiruppur District, for allegedly murdering Leelavathi.
After Chandra’s arrest, her daughter came to visit her And was in a state of utter shock to see her mother’s condition. She noticed that the police used 3rd degree measures on her, and also tortured her by injecting needles in her nails and fingers. They also hit her with lathis, inserted lathis in her private parts, hung her upside down thus making the conditions miserable.
Even after carrying out several investigations by the Judicial Magistrate Udumalaipettai, the investigations did not favour the victim.
Hence, a writ of mandamus was filed in the Supreme Court under Article 32 to transfer the investigation to another judicial magistrate.
Judgement
Here, the Court found that such a case falls under the ambit of the Supreme Court’s exception and, after looking into the facts of the case, ordered the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to carry out an inquiry.
The police officials were held guilty and suspended from their duties.
It was also held that the state compensate the victim with an interim settlement of ₹2 lakhs.
Sheela Devi vs. State of Haryana and Anr. (2016)
Facts of the case
Not much information on the facts of this case is available; however, in this case, a woman was raped and murdered by a police constable. This incident occurred in the police station. This occurrence led to several protests across the state. Finally, the government had to take requisite actions and carry out amendments in matters relating to rape laws.
Amends brought in by the judgement
The Indian Government took quick action after the chaos that occurred, considering the unfortunate incident. Politician Raj Narain made an announcement that he will be fasting until the death sentence is pronounced against the rapists. After this incident, several amendments to the rape law as well as the legal definitions of rape were made.
Rajasthan custodial rape case
In this case, a 35 year-old Dalit woman has claimed to have been raped by several police officials in Rajsthan’s Churu district after she was taken into police custody. She said, out of these police officials, one of them was the SHO (station house officer) of the Sardarshahar Police Station.
The woman was allegedly raped, tortured, and detained by the police for several days on a stretch. She said, the police officials plucked her nails, hurt her eyes and later raped her and that the act was allegedly initiated by the SHO.
She also claimed that she and her brother-in-law (now deceased) were framed in the case of theft and were wrongfully detained in the same case.
The alleged victim also claimed that when she met her brother-in-law in the police station he told her how he was tortured and beaten to death in police custody.
Considering all the above occurrences, a letter was written to the Chief Minister to seek relief; following which an FIR reporting the crime was lodged.
The case has now been transferred to the Crime Investigation Department’s crime branch.
Case law on custodial rape where false allegations of custodial rape were imposed on police officials
The above cases were instances of police officials being guilty of the offence of custodial rape, however, there are some cases where false allegations are imposed on people in authority for one’s own ulterior motives. Below is one such case.
Arati Majhi v. State of Odisha (2014)
Facts of the case
In this case, a petition was filed by the victim’s father under Section 176(1a) of the CrPC claiming that on 12th February, 2010, around 4 a.m., while a special inquiry was carried out by the Special Operation Group and Central Reserve Police Force for conducting anti-naxalite operations, the petitioner’s daughter and his nephew were taken into the custody of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF).
He further claimed that his daughter and nephew were taken to the police camp at Paralakhemundi, where they were tortured and assaulted. Furthermore, his daughter was gang raped by the officials. Both the victims were then sent to judicial custody at R. Udayagiri sub-jail.
The victim’s father claimed that the faces of his daughter and nephew were covered in black cloth when they were produced in front of the magistrate. Also, they were not permitted to address their grievances before the magistrate.
The father then stated that he met his daughter once in March and five times later who kept narrating the same incident to him for which he tried to file a complaint but his efforts were in vain. Hence, he prayed that an enquiry be carried on in this matter.
After submitting this petition, an enquiry was carried out and all the witnesses including the victim, her father, the officer who arrested her and the lady constable who escorted her to the court were cross-examined.
On examination, it occurred that the facts given by the daughter and her father in the petition were contrasting. The victim said she was raped by five officers where as per the petition she was raped by three officers. Further, the victim claimed she was raped en route in a jungle while bringing her to Parlakhemundi, whereas, as per the petition, the victim was taken to the camp at Parlakhemundi and was raped and tortured there.
Additionally, no complaint was filed when the incident occurred and that there is a delay of six long months in filing the application and there is no reasonable justification from the petiions’s side for such an inordinate delay.
The facts of the case were examined and cross examination of the witnesses were conducted in a critical manner.
Judgement
The Orissa High Court, considering the aforementioned facts, reached the following verdict:
There is no need to conduct an inquiry into the alleged rape perpetrated by the police officer when there is no primafacie evidence.
Further, the Court said that there is barely any scope for conducting an enquiry in this matter.
Since no prima facie evidence exists against the officers, the girl cannot be said to have been raped in police custody and it a case of false allegations against the officials.
The High Court dismissed the complaint on the grounds that there was no merit, whatsoever.
Present scenario of custodial rape in India
Sexual harassment or violence can be regarded as one of the markers of male dominance. Additionally, as per the report “Crime in India 2021’ published by NCRB, it was found that 31,677 cases of rapes were registered in India, with an average of 86 everyday and around 49 cases of crimes against women were lodged every hour.
There is no proper data on custodial rape cases, however, as per NCRB data, between the period of 2001 and 2018, only 26 were convicted of custodial violence, whereas, around 1727 deaths of such instances were recorded in our country. Further, from 2015 to 2019, 36% of deaths were reported to be by suicide when the individuals were in the custody of the police, whereas only 6% of the cases were recorded under the category of physical assault by police officials. Moreover, in the last 10 years, around 403 out of 1004 deaths in police custody, which accounts for about 40% of the total deaths, were listed under the category of death due to hospitalisation, illness, or natural death.
Also, as per the 2015 report published by the NCRB, titled ‘Crime in India 2015’, out of 34,651 rape cases in India, 95 were that of custodial rape. Amongst these cases, the highest number of custodial rape cases were recorded in Uttar Pradesh, with a whopping 91 cases, followed by Uttarakhand, where 2 cases of custodial rape were reported. Then, one case each of custodial rape was reported in Andhra Pradesh and West Bengal.
Moreover, in 2016, only 26 cases of custodial rape were reported. Out of these cases, 11 were from Uttar Pradesh.
Furthermore, as per the 2018 report by NCRB, Madhya Pradesh had the highest number of rape cases for three years, where out of 5433 cases, 54 cases were related to children below the age of six years.
The challenges against custodial rape
Custodial rapes typically occur at police stations, jails, and other places where the evidence is under the control of public servants or authorities. It becomes quite tough to register an FIR against such an individual, namely because of the following reasons:
Police or other officials refuse to acknowledge or lodge a complaint of the victim. further , victims often face obstacles or difficulties in registering a complaint due to various reasons.
There is political pressure on the authorities to subdue statistics on crimes, including statistics on custodial rape.
The informal practices of police officials and other authorities are recorded in the form of a Community Social Register, commonly known as a CSR, instead of an FIR. This makes it quite easy to erase records of such offences.
Further, Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code states that legal proceedings against a public servant cannot be conducted for any act he does to perform his official duty.
Law reforms on provisions relating to custodial rape
As observed above, the cases of custodial rapes were on the rise, and the process of penalising the officials for such barbaric crimes was quite challenging; hence, the women’s moment demanded that there be an enactment of law related to custodial rape. This led to a series of reforms, some of which are listed below:
Expansion of the term ‘custody’
Over a period of time and with the efforts put in by women’s movement activists’, the horizon of the term ‘custody’ has been given a broader meaning since 1983. Before 1983, it was “rape by police officials in the police station”, whereas now it includes:
rape by police officials in the police station and the victim in custody;
rape by a public servant committed on a woman when she is in his custody;
rape committed by an army official at a location where the forces are deployed;
rape committed by the management or staff in a jail, prison, remand home, women’s home or other such places where women are kept in custody; rape by hospital staff where a woman is in custody.
Burden of proof
Under criminal law, the burden of proof lies on the victims, i.e., they have to evince the guilt of the accused. Here, the accused is considered innocent until proven guilty. Further, under Section 114A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the cases of custodial rape were investigated. As per Section 114A, if the prosecution achieves the goal of proving that the act of sexual intercourse was committed without obtaining her consent, then the court will presume the absence of the consent. With the addition of this latest provision, the accused has to prove the onus, i.e., that woman consented to sex.
Further, in the case of Nawab Khan and the State (1990), the Madhya Pradesh High Court reached a decision that if the victim on whom a sexual activity is conducted, states that it was by her consent, the court must accept such a declaration, and the burden of proof will fall on the accused to prove that the intercourse was consensual.
Non-performance of duty will result in penalty
An amendment was carried out in criminal law in 2013 that stated that if a government official does not lodge a report of rape charges even after the victim approached him to do so, it will be conceded that the officer assisted the offender to commit such an atrocious act. The same is punishable under the law. The amendment states that if the police officer does not lodge a complaint against the offender, he will be punished with imprisonment for life and also be held liable to pay a fine.
Action against not registering an FIR
When it comes to custodial rapes, there have been instances where the police officers have denied to record an FIR (First Information Report). However, with the 2013 Amendment that embodied Section 166A in the IPC that states that a public servant will be penalised if he/she refuses to register an FIR in the following cases that are cognizable in nature:
For not following the provisions, the minimum punishment is 6 months, that may be extended to 2 years, and shall also be liable for a fine.
No prior permission needed from the government
Before an amendment was carried out in 2013, wherein, Section 197 of the CrPC was modified. It had a provision that mandated the prior approval of the government before prompting any proceedings or inquiry against a public servant for an act committed in the discharge of their official duties. If it is stated that the aforementioned requirement is no longer a necessity, actions can be taken against a public servant if they are alleged to have committed a wrong under Section 375 of the IPC.
Stringent punishment
Oftentimes, the punishment sentenced for the crime is directly proportional to the gravity of the crime committed and is generally an indicator of the seriousness with which the crime is treated by the law. With the 1983 Amendment, the punishment for custodial rape was increased in comparison to rape committed by an ordinary person. A minimum of 10 years of rigorous imprisonment, which could be extended to life imprisonment, along with a fine, was prescribed under the law.
Amends and reports on custodial rape
The 172nd Report by the Law Commission of India
The 172nd Report by the Law Commission of India was a result of a petition made in the case of Sakshi v. Union of India (2004)to draw the attention of the Apex Court to the fact that the laws on rape are not adequate so as to cover various sexual atrocities against women and children.
A draft amendment to modify the provisions of the IPC was proposed by Sakshi, a voluntary organisation that works for the welfare of women and children. The Law Commission thus prepared the draft keeping in mind the suggestions of the organisation.
In this Report, recommendations were made to amend Section 375 of the IPC and make it gender neutral, along with modifications in sections 376, 376A, 376B, 376C, and 376D. The Commission also advised that a new Section 376E must be incorporated that deals with illegitimate sexual contact, the omission of Section 377 of the IPC, and the intensification of punishment under Section 509 of the IPC.
The Report focuses on the need to review the rape laws in light of increased incidents of custodial rape and crimes of sexual abuse against youngsters. The crime of sexual assault on a child causes lasting psychic damage to the child, and as such, it is essential to prevent sexual abuse of children through stringent provisions. The United Nations Conventions and various constitutional provisions also underline the need for protecting the child from all forms of sexual exploitation and abuse.
The 1983 Amendment
The Criminal Law Amendment Act,1983, made modifications to the Indian Penal Code and incorporated provisions for custodial rape.
The 2013 Amendment
Certain changes were brought in by the Criminal Law Amendment Act of 2013. This Amendment Act modified sections 376B, 376C, and 376D with regards to custodial rape. The provisions of sections 376B and 376D were included in Section 376C. Further, the penalty was increased from five years of imprisonment along with a fine to ten years of imprisonment along with a fine.
Preventive measures to annihilate the issue of custodial rape
The nature of custodial rape is extremely autocratic, and it is quite difficult to punish the wrongdoers who commit such offences. We need stricter legislation that can make sure the position or authority of a person does not matter when it comes to sexual violence and crimes.
Even with the recent amendment in the Criminal Procedure Code, quick trials of cases on matters relating to sexual offences are still a dream, the reason being that there are several cases long standing in the courts. The following steps can be taken to curb the issue of custodial rape:
Separate courts
The Union Minister had offered a suggestion that cases of rape, sexual harassment, and sexual assault can be resolved at a quicker pace, provided there are specific courts to serve the purpose. It is high time measures are taken to establish such courts.
Implementation of human rights courts
It is not a fact unknown that courts in India are burdened with several cases, and the conviction rate, too, is not quick paced. So, to help the judiciary in cases of sexual violence and custodial rapes, human rights courts could be incorporated in every district and every case falling under the aforementioned category could be discussed and settled at a quicker pace.
Appointment of female constables across every police station
Female constables must be appointed in all police stations so as to make the environment for female victims to be safe and secure.
While states have been instructed to compulsorily reserve 10% to 33% for women in police, no state has succeeded in achieving that goal. Further, only 12% of women were in Indian police services in 2020.
Set up an internal complaint committee
In every police station, an internal complaint committee for all the females working there must be set up. Additionally, a rapid response desk must be incorporated so as to include complaints of custodial rape.
Usage of technology
The Supreme Court in a recent case, Paramvir Singh Saini v. Baljit Singh (2020), had ordered that CCTV cameras be installed in all the police stations in India. Further, it also stated that such cameras must also be installed in interrogation rooms.
Installing CCTV cameras in police stations and prisons across the country, establishing human rights commissions, and making surprise visits to jails and lock-upd by non-official people will help limit the cases of custodial rape and torture.
Further, you must be aware that there were cameras in prisons earlier as well, however, they were installed in areas like a mess, exterior walls, towers, etc., they were installed to be careful that no prisoner escapes the prison, and in case they succeed in escaping, the same can be captured in the CCTV footage. Also, it must be noted that installing a CCTV camera will not automatically help reduce or prevent custodial rape and torture, but will only make conviction easier as the activity will be captured in the camera, thus being a credible source of evidence.
Installing cameras in police stations
Installing cameras in police stations is far more effective than that in prisons, as police stations and lock-ups are the major sources where such issues have been witnessed to occur. This is not to say that cameras should not be installed in prisons at all. They can be added in common areas like corridors but not in barracks and cells so as to protect the right to life and personal liberty of the prisoners. Other options could be to install cameras in cells and barracks while maintaining a balance between the safety and privacy of the prisoners. You might wonder how that could be. Let’s see.
If CCTV cameras are installed in barracks and cells, they shall not be activated until there is a need to do so. The same can be done through alarm buttons that could either be pressed by one of the prisoners or someone from the prison authority. So suppose, if any activity is detected or there is an activity that should be recorded, the prisoner or the authority can quickly press the alarm button, record the act, and then put it off, hence being used only when they are an absolute necessity.
False accusations
It is important that any individual who fraudulently accuses a public servant on the charges of custodial rape, be penalised with a hefty fine and imprisonment so as to create a deterrent effect. Accusing someone of false rape charges must be termed a serious offence, and the wrongdoer must be penalised strictly, as such accusations have the ability to ruin the lives of public servants.
Even though rape is a serious offence taking place all across the world, there are individuals who accuse someone of rape to seek attention, and later, upon interogation and inquiry, such claims are found to be untrue. False rape accusations are significantly less common in comparison to actual rape cases, but they can have far more devastating effects on the public at large. The most common reason for false accusations of rape is to seek revenge against the individual, for they are under the notion that they have been betrayed.
The role of society in helping curb the issue of custodial rapes
Society plays a major role in shaping any aspect of the community. Tomorrow is too late, and we, as individuals belonging to the same society, must stand up and raise our voices against atrocities against the females of our nation.
With evolution, society too has evolved and is witnessed to take measures against issues like custodial rape, inter alia. We have several NGOs that work hard for the victims of such happenings. Further, several political parties and women have joined hands with such NGOs to combat the issue. Moreover, the government is seen to be gearing up in such cases. Additionally, females in the 21st century are no longer afraid to raise their voices in case such a mishap happens, and they are also supported by their family members and friends to fight against such atrocities; take, for example, the Nirbhaya rape case, where the whole country, including her parents, raised their voice against such a mishap.
Also, police officials and public servants are understanding the gravity of such crimes, as many activists are spreading awareness about such delicate issues. Women are getting the liberty to raise their voices, and it can safely be said that India is growing into a better, safe, secure, and more effective nation.
Conclusion
Custidal rape is the worst mark a woman could possibly have, it is even worse than murder, especially in a developing nation like ours. However, when it is executed by someone we trust and rely upon to safeguard us and our rights, it becomes even worse. Custodial violence in India has been a major human rights issue for decades on a stretch now. It is also one of the most significant causes of hindrance to democracy and the development of human beings.
Even though an amendment has been brought in by Parliament on rape laws in the country, there are several judgements like that of the Mathura rape case that are still not successful in serving justice to the victims of such remorseless activity.
India still needs several modifications in the case of legislation on custodial rape to provide justice and eliminate the issue of custodial rape. We need stringent laws along with an emendation in the existing laws, thus making it easier and hassle free for women or the aggrieved party to lodge a complaint. Further, even when the punishment for custodial rape under Section 376 of the IPC states 10 years, most of the rapists get through with a punishment of three to four years.
Moreover, the victims are scared to report incidents of custodial rape as they fear the rapists are in authority and that their lives could be in danger if they raise their voice against a public servant. Additionally, even if they register a complaint, the evidence stays with the public servants, and they can easily destroy, edit, or modify it. Moreover, the number of cases of custodial rape is lower because of governmental pressure to show fewer crime rate statistics.
In order to curb the issue of custodial rape, it is crucial that preventive measures be taken and stringent action be brought against the rapists, irrespective of their position, power, or authority, only then will the cases actually reduce in India.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the punishment for custodial rape in India?
In India, custodial rape is one of the most barbaric crimes that came to light between the 1970s and 1980s. The punishment for the same is imprisonment for at least ten years, that is extendable to life imprisonment, and a heavy fine.
Is there a severe punishment for repeat offenders of rape?
Under Section 376E of the IPC, an individual who has been formerly convicted of an offence punishable under Section 376 or Section 376A or Section 376D (i.e., committing rape, causing death or vegetative state in the course of committing rape, or committing gang-rape) and is again convicted for an offence under the aforementioned sections, the person can either be given a death sentence or a sentence of life imprisonment will be ordered against him. However, a point must be made that a previous conviction must be present, followed by the next conviction, to sentence the offender, as mentioned above.
Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:
The purpose behind intellectual property rights (IPR) is to award the artist, creator, or inventor with a security that will help them exercise their creation for monetary purposes for a limited period of time on the one hand and, on the other, restrict others from exploiting such rights. When it comes to the music industry, IPR has a primary role to play. In today’s age, when copying and remixing have become usual activities, safeguarding the statutory rights of individuals in the music industry has received attention. It is necessary to note that any work in relation to the music industry cannot be copied in an unauthorised manner. Similarly, when it comes to the broadcasting and distribution of songs, the same also needs to be carried out with the due permission of their owner. This necessity is required to facilitate the revenue it carries with it. This article is dedicated to understanding the protection offered by IPR laws and the nuances in the music industry.
Who owns a song
Making a song is not a one-person job; it involves different steps such as songwriting, arranging, tracking, editing, mixing, and mastering, and different people have been playing these roles. So the major question is who is the legal owner of the intellectual property of a song? In a judgement of M/S Indian Record Manufacturing vs. Agni Music Sdn Bhd (2010) by the Honourable Madras High Court, it was held that the author of the musical work is a music composer, but the producer is the owner of the work unless he (the producer) who hired the composer gives up his rights in favour of the composer.
Copyright in music
Copyright is a form of intellectual property where a copyright owner has the right to protect his work (artistic, dramatic, literary, cinematograph films, sound recordings, photographs, posthumous publications, anonymous and pseudonymous publications, works of government, works of international organisations, and software) from getting copied. Having copyright over a song or music prevents others from reproducing the work. It grants performance rights only to the copyright owner. In India and countries like the UK, copyright is granted as soon as the artistic work comes into existence, provided it is captured in a tangible form, unlike in the US, where copyright registration is mandatory. Copyright for literary and musical works lasts for the owner’s lifetime plus 60 years after the death of the owner, and if the work includes the contribution of more than one person, the term is 60 years from the death of the last author/artist.
In India, copyright laws are governed by the Copyright Act of 1957. Music contains different elements and is the contribution of multiple people and their intellects. There are different stages in the formation of a song, which include the lyrics being written by a lyricist, the composer adding music to it, and, after that, a singer singing that song. Now this song is recorded in the studio by the singer, and the producer of the song records it. So it can be concluded that it is the combined effort of multiple people.
Provisions in copyright laws for music
Music is not considered a whole; under copyright laws, a song is divided into various parts, and the owner of that part can claim their rights only to that part of the song. Section 2(d)(i) of the Act states that in relation to literary and dramatic works, the person who writes these works is called the author of the work; similarly, in songs, the lyricist is the author of the work, so that the lyricist can claim his copyright over the lyrics of the songs as an author.
Section 2(d)(ii) of the Act states that in relation to musical works, the composer would be considered the author of the work. Further, Section 2(p) describes “musical work” as a work consisting of music and includes any graphical notation of such work but does not include any words or any action intended to be sung, spoken, or performed with the music. A composer is a person who adds music to the lyrics of a song, and therefore he has the right to claim copyright over the music of the song.
Section 2 (qq) describes “performer” as an actor, singer, musician, dancer, acrobat, juggler, conjurer, snake charmer, a person delivering a lecture, or any other person who makes a performance. Thus, under this Section, a singer can claim his copyright over the work for which he made contributions.
A producer is described under Section 2(uu) of the Copyright Act, 1957, in relation to a cinematograph film or sound recording. A producer is a person who takes the initiative and responsibility for making the work. As the music producer is the one who undertakes the recording and broadcasting responsibilities along with various creative/ technical leadership roles, he is the owner of the recording of the song.
Exclusive rights granted under the Copyright Act, 1957
To protect the rights of the author, various provisions are laid down that provide various rights to the author, and these rights are mentioned under Section 14 of the Copyrights Act, 1957, and are known as exclusive rights. There are three different types of exclusive rights, namely, economic rights, moral rights, and neighbouring rights.
Economic rights
Copyright is important to protect the value of an author or artist, and their contribution is the reason for the growth and development in many fields. To motivate these artists to make further contributions in the field, it is of prime importance that they are sufficiently compensated for their work. Just appreciation of the work is not enough; the monetary interest of the artist must be safeguarded, and it works as motivation for them. Economic rights are further divided into six more rights.
Right to reproduction
This is considered one of the fundamental rights of the author, as it allows the author to reproduce his work and preserve it in any form or medium. Only the author has this right, and no one else holds this right; therefore, if some other person is using the work, they are required to get permission from the author.
Right to distribution
The right to distribution is the right under which the owner of the work can make his work available for sale, rent, lease, or lending to the public. This helps the author prevent the distribution of unauthorised work. It also includes the concept of the first sale doctrine according to which once a person has purchased a copy of the copyrighted work from the copyright owner, he gains the right to sell, display, or dispose of that particular copy.
Right of adaptation
According to Section 2(a) of the Copyright Act, 1957, adaptation in a musical work signifies any arrangement or transcription of the work. It is the exclusive right of the copyright owner to make adaptations of their work or allow others to adapt or modify their work.
Right of broadcasting
The right of broadcasting is the right of the copyright owner to broadcast his work that has already been published. This right can also be termed the right to communicate the work.
Rental rights
Rental rights are the right to rent a copy of the sound recording or any other work that is recognised under copyright laws. The producer of the music or a song has the right to approve or disapprove the production, sale and distribution of sound recording
Right of public performance
Section 38 of the Copyright Act, 1957, recognises the right of the performer, thereby introducing the concept of ‘performer rights’. Performer’s rights can be considered as a kind of agreement where the performer obtains the permission of the original owner of the copyrighted work to use music in a live music event, broadcast or cable television or radio etc. In return, the latter is required to pay an amount to the composer of the music. Performance in ‘public’ means performance in a public setting, and the audience is not limited to only relatives or close acquaintances.
Moral rights
Moral rights do not play any role in providing any monetary benefits to the authors. They would rather safeguard the honour and reputation of the author and his work. Section 57 of the Copyright Act of 1957 deals with moral rights. These rights help in avoiding any kind of modification or alteration of the artist’s or author’s work. Even if the owner of the copyright has transferred its copyrighted work to others, the moral right stays with the original creator only. If someone is using the work of the artist in a way that harms the artist’s reputation, the artist may file a case for infringement of moral rights. Previously, moral rights were available only for literary work, but in the case of Mannu Bhandari vs. Kala Vikas Pictures Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. (1986), the Delhi High Court held that moral rights are available for visual and audio work as well.
Penalties for infringement in case of music
One must understand the meaning of the term ‘infringement’ with regards to copyright. Copyright infringement happens for the following reasons:
The copyrighted work belongs to the original author and is an original creation as well.
The copyright infringement work has to be actually copied from the author’s work.
It is ideal to note that the minimum punishment for copyright infringement of copyright is imprisonment for six months with the minimum fine of Rs. 50,000/-. Further, in cases involving a second and subsequent conviction, the minimum punishment is imprisonment for one year with a fine of Rs. 1 lakh.
Trademark in music
In recent times, there has been an increase in awareness of intellectual property rights, and the owners of the work are able to monetize their work in the most effective way. Getting a trademark registration for a song title or in the name of a musician is a common thing nowadays. In India, the first ever song to get a trademark registration was “Why this Kolaveri Di” in 2011 which was a massive overnight success. It became the most searched video in India and an internet phenomenon across Asia. Sony Music Entertainment India recorded this song and filed for a trademark. This registration gave Sony Entertainment the ability to monetise the song via compact disc, SD card, and cassette.
One of the most well-known and renowned names in the music industry is Taylor Swift. Not only is she a great singer, but she also has canny business acumen. Ms. Swift owns over 200 U.S. trademark registrations, which allowed her to preserve her music and the reputation attached to it, which allowed her to take control over her image and career, thereby securing herself as one of the top recording artists. She has registered her name, initials, name of her tour, her albums, name of the fan club (Swifties) and song lyrics like “the old Taylor can’t come to the phone right now” “look what you made me do” “and I’ll write your name” etc.
While there are many artists in the West, such as Beyonce, Adele, and many more, who have registered their names as trademarks, this trend of trademark registration by singers for their names is not very common in India. In the case of D.M. Entertainment vs. Baby Gift House and Ors. (2018), the Delhi High Court recognised the rights and reputation that a singer holds. In this case, the Court restrained the defendant, who had a registered domain name ‘dalermehndi.net’ which was deceptively similar to the registered trademark ‘DALER MEHNDI’.
Penalties for trademark infringement
Trademark infringement occurs when a person uses a trademark that is the same or similar to a registered trademark without the authorisation of the original owner for the same or similar goods/services. Trademark infringement, being a cognizable offence, has the following remedies:
Temporary injunction;
Permanent injunction;
Damages;
Account of profits (damages equivalent to the profits earned from the infringement);
Destruction of all those goods bearing the unauthorised trademark; and
Cost involved in the legal proceedings.
The criminal remedies that are available for trademark infringement are:
Imprisonment for a period not less than six months which may extend to three years as well; and
A fine of a sum not less than ₹50,000, which may extend to ₹2 lakh.
Conclusion
The scope of protecting the rights associated with the music and entertainment industries is at a very early stage in India compared to a developed country like the US. The big recording labels are very diligent in protecting their rights, while the independent artist or one who has just begun their career is not aware of their rights and tends to be gullible by these recording labels; therefore, it becomes crucial for the artist to know their rights and possible remedies if those rights are infringed.
Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:
The term ‘sedition’ means doing some act or using some words which incite people to go against the government authorities or the rule of law. This law was introduced by Britishers to counter the freedom of speech and expression in the colonial-era. Many freedom fighters or leaders like Subhas Chandra Bose, Mahatma Gandhi, and Bal Gangadhar Tilak were charged under the law of sedition. The conflict between sedition and freedom of speech has always been a topic of debate. It is said that politicians use sedition as a political tool to violate the right to freedom of speech. Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India provides freedom of speech & expression, and it’s a fundamental right that cannot be taken away. In this article, we will discuss the conflict between Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code of 1860 and Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution. Further, we will also discuss if the sedition law introduced by Britishers is still needed in independent India or not.
Sedition law in India
Section 124A of the IPC defines sedition as an act “whoever by words, either spoken or written, or by any signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards the Government established by law in India.”
This is a non-bailable offence, and punishment can go from 3 years to a lifetime and a fine. Anyone charged under this law will also be prohibited from working for the government, and their passport will be confiscated by the government.
Conflict between sedition and freedom of speech
The conflict between sedition laws and freedom of speech has been going on since the colonial-era. Britishers implemented this law to stop freedom fighters or leaders from speaking against them and reduce the threat against them. In 1837, Thomas Babington Macaulay drafted the sedition law, and in 1870, this law was introduced in India by James Stephen through an amendment. Since then, on multiple occasions, this law has violated the freedom of speech and expression of common people, and later it transformed into a political tool to prevent anyone speaking against them. Ironically, the sedition law has now been abolished by the UK, New Zealand, and Ghana. But in India, this law is still intact. According to the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) report, 76 sedition cases were filed in 2021. In numerous instances, journalists or media have also been charged under this law. Mere criticism should not be charged with sedition. In a democratic country, the value of freedom of speech and expression cannot be denied. Being able to express feelings freely makes a country truly democratic. But we should also keep in mind that the right vested in us under Article 19(1)(a) is not an absolute right and is subject to some restrictions. These restrictions are imposed to-
Prevent the sovereignty and integrity of the country,
to prevent incitement,
to prevent hate-speech, etc.
Instances of conflict
In the case of Vinod Dua vs. Union of India (2021),_ the Supreme Court dismissed a FIR against senior journalist Vinod Dua in Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, more than a year after local BJP officials had accused him of making disparaging remarks against Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the centre on his YouTube show. A bench made up of Justices UU Lalit and Vineet Saran said every journalist is entitled to protection under the Kedar Nath Singh case, which defined the breadth of the act of sedition under Section 124A of the IPC.
On 13th February 2021, a 22 year-old climate change activist named Disha Ravi was detained under sedition for her relation with a “toolkit” for the farmer’s protest. Delhi Court issued her release order within one week of her arrest. According to Court the sedition cannot be used as a bandage for the government’s injured ego.
Another important case is Tara Singh Gopi Chand vs. The State (1950), in this case the Punjab High Court held the sedition law to be constitutionally invalid because this law levied unreasonable restrictions on the freedom of speech and expression. This is an important case because it prompted the Jawaharlal Nehru led government to bring about reasonable restrictions to the freedom of speech and expression.
In 2010, Dr. Binayak Sen, a civil rights activist, was found guilty of sedition and given a life sentence by a Chhattisgarh Court because he was found guilty of conspiring with the Naxals. He tried to create a network to combat the government. The Supreme Court granted him bail in 2011. The judge said it’s a democratic country, and Dr. Sen might be a sympathiser, but that does not make him guilty of sedition.
In Kedar Nath Singh vs. State of Bihar (1962), the Supreme Court endeavoured to limit the potential for abuse of the sedition law while upholding its constitutional validity. The Court made it clear that criticism of the government cannot be classified as sedition unless it is an act or speech which disrupts public peace or initiates violence.
India is known as the biggest democratic country in the world. But in a democratic country, if freedom of speech is controlled by political agendas, it creates a disturbing image. In the 2022 press freedom index, India got 150th place out of 180 countries, but in 2023, India ascended to 161. The countries that occupied the first, second, and third positions are Norway, Finland, and Denmark, respectively. Sedition is not only a threat to freedom of speech; it is also a threat to democracy. It can be said that this law can be easily misused.
Does India still need sedition law of colonial-era
The sedition law was brought to India by the British just to oppress the Indians and prevent them from speaking against the government. You must have heard about Mr. Bal Gangadhar Tilak, now let me tell you an interesting fact about him. He was the first person to be held guilty of sedition in Colonial India. The British government charged him on account of his articles published in Tilak’s Marathi newspaper, Kesari. Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, and Bhagat Singh are some famous freedom fighters who were also held guilty under the sedition law. In 1962, the Supreme Court of India held this law to be constitutionally valid. Because without this law, the state would be in a complete state of chaos, and there would be no law to keep a check on the spread of hate or disorder against the state. The government needs to understand that criticism of government policy or the government itself is part of democracy. Misusing sedition to prevent people from expressing their point of view hurts the fundamental right of freedom of speech. Recently, in May 2022, the Supreme Court of India put a hold on this law and dropped all pending court trials under Section 124A of the IPC. The SC allowed the Union of India to review the colonial-era law. A three-judge bench led by the Chief Justice of India, Mr. N.V. Ramana instructed to keep all sedition charges in abeyance. The Supreme Court decided this to put a stop to misuse of the law. This is an appreciable step taken by the SC for the first time in the history of sedition law in India. This is the time we need to come out of the colonial-era’s abusive laws. This law is absurd because of its wrong usage to disturb freedom of speech and expression. Criticism always leads to growth. No one, whether media or common people, should be deprived of their freedom of expression because they criticise the government or its policies. Criticising national policy does not make someone anti national. It’s a mere portrayal of one’s thoughts or opinions on that policy, law, etc.
Conclusion
Sedition law and freedom of speech are a never-ending debate. But for the first time, it may come to an end if this law is dropped. But at the same time, we cannot ignore the importance of a nation’s security. This law should clearly mention that if someone tries to disturb public peace or incite violence, then only they should be punished under this law. Whether we need this law or not will always be a controversial matter. We just need to ensure that the fundamental right of being able to speak or express ourselves freely is not taken away by misusing sedition laws.
Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:
This article has been written by Subhadeepa Sen, a student from the School of Law, Christ (Deemed to be University), Bangalore. In this article, the author seeks to explore Section 503 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and explain the ambit of the punishment provided therein. In addition, the author has also delved into the ingredients of the offence and analysed certain landmark judgements in that regard.
Chapter XXII of the IPC provides for offences of criminal intimidation, insult and annoyance. The offence related to “Criminal Intimidation” is provided under Section 503 of the IPC.
An action is said to be an offence under Section 503 when someone threatens a person with physical harm, damage to their property or reputation in order to induce alarm to them. This creates a sense of fear in the victim, and in order to avoid the execution of such a threat, the perpetrator causes the victim to do an act which is not legally bound to do, or causes him to omit doing an act that he is legally bound to do. It is noteworthy that Section 503 is guided by a ‘two-fold’ criteria, one being the Actus Reus component and the Mens Rea component.
Crimes under Section 503 IPC
The offence of criminal intimidation is defined under Section 503 of the Indian Penal Code. The term ‘intimidation’ has been defined in Merriam-Webster’s dictionary as “to make someone feel timid or fearful.” When a person threatens or intimidates anyone with any injury or harm to his person, reputation or property in order to compel him to do an act that he is not legally bound to do or cause him to omit to do an act he is legally entitled to do in order to avoid the execution of the threat, it is said to be criminal intimidation.
It also constitutes an offence under this Section when the person threatens another with harm to the person or property of a person he is interested in. This threatening action must have a tendency to cause alarm in the victim and create a sense of fear in his mind. The perpetrator may use words or actions in the way of gestures to threaten the victim’s person, property, reputation or anyone who the victim might be interested in.
For instance, A makes B sign a contract at gun-point. A is said to be committing the offence of criminal intimidation under Section 503 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The reason being that A is intimidating B by holding him at gunpoint, there is a threat of injury to the person of B therefore fitting into the category of the offence of criminal intimidation. Another instance would be P threatening Q by swinging a knife towards him to hand over the wallet with money to P. This creates a sense of fear in Q’s mind because the knife could potentially hurt him and be fatal.
Nature of offence under Section 503 IPC
The offence under Section 503 is a non-cognizable offence. In case of any non-cognizable offence, the accused cannot be arrested by the police without a warrant from the magistrate which orders the arrest of the accused. Additionally, the police, upon receipt of a complaint under Section 503 cannot start the investigation suo moto. The investigation in such a case can only begin with the permission of the court.
The offence under Section 503 is a bailable offence. The accused arrested for an offence under this Act has the right to get bail. It is not at the discretion of the judge to grant bail or not. Once a person is arrested for an offence under Section 503 IPC, the person is entitled to get bail from the police station itself. The accused is required to submit a Form-45 provided in the Second Schedule of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973. Upon applying for bail at the police station, the officer has the authority to grant the bail. In case the officer refuses to grant bail, the accused can apply for bail before the court which has jurisdiction over the matter.
Furthermore, the offence under Section 503 IPC is compoundable. It means that the complaint can be taken back by the complainant upon a compromise between the accused and the complainant. If the complainant and the accused come to a compromise, the charges can be dropped against the accused at the option of the complainant. This compounding of offences shall take place under Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973. However, it is to be kept in mind that such a compromise must be bona fide in nature. If the complainant agrees to compromise in exchange of consideration which he/she is not entitled to, this shall not cause the charges to drop and the accused can still be prosecuted for Section 503. Such a transaction would not be bona fide in nature and therefore would not amount to compounding of the offence.
Essentials of criminal intimidation
In order to understand the scope of the offence under Section 503, one must first break down the definition of the offence. The Section provides that:
when a person threatens another with an injury to his person, his property, reputation;
to the person in any of whom the victim is interested with the intention of causing alarm to such a person;
to compel him to do something that he is not legally bound to do; or
to omit him from doing something that he is legally bound to do in order to avoid the execution of the threat is said to have committed the offence of criminal intimidation.
From the above definition, the following essentials of the offence can be drawn out.
It must be a positive act of causing threat to a person;
It must be directed towards his person, property or reputation;
It must be directed towards the person or reputation or property of anyone in whom the victim is interested;
It must be done with the intention of causing alarm to such a person; or
It must cause him to do something which he is not legally bound to do or refrain him from doing something which he is legally bound to do.
Elaboration on the ingredients
Threat to a person
This may be understood as an expression or act of a person which causes fear in the mind of another person. It may be both a threat of physical harm as well as creating a state of fear in the mind without any physical threat. It must be understood that not all acts which create fear in the mind of a person would be considered as a threat under this provision. For example, A threatens B by saying that if he doesn’t follow A’s instruction, A will sue B in court. This shall not be considered as a threat since the act of taking recourse to legal action is not an illegal act and the action of A would not amount to criminal intimidation under Section 503.
Threat directed towards the person, property or reputation
This Section talks about three kinds of threats. In one case, the threat is directed towards the person. This refers to the threat of physical harm or harm to the body of a person. The second is a threat to the property of a person. The term “property” refers to both movable as well as immovable property. Any threat of doing an act which causes the value of the property to diminish shall constitute intimidation under this Section.
Any threat of causing harm to the reputation of a person will fall into the purview of criminal intimidation. Harm to reputation includes harming the goodwill, insult to the dignity or modesty etc. The action may be directed at the complainant directly or towards any person (his body, property or reputation) in whom the complainant has any interest.
Intention to cause alarm to such a person
This implies that the offender must do such an act with the intention of creating fear in the mind of the complainant. Intention to create fear is a key element to constitute the offence of criminal intimidation under Section 503 of the Indian Penal Code.
It must cause him to do something which he is not legally bound to do or refrain him from doing something which he is legally bound to do.
In order to avoid suffering from the action that the offender threatens the victim, the victim may do any act which he is not legally bound to do or refrain from doing an act which he is legally bound to do.
For example, if A threatens B to hand over his wallet to him or he will stab B, B in order to save himself, hands over his wallet to B. There has been an offence of criminal intimidation in this case.
Interpretation of actus reus in Section 503 IPC
The act of threatening someone with the aim of causing hurt, damage to the property or reputation or of someone he may be interested in, shall constitute the Actus Reus aspect of Section 503. This action shall be done by the offender in order to create a sense of fear and timidness which in a way coerces him to act in a way that is directed by the offender. In the case of Priyanath Gupta vs Laljhi Chowkidar (1923), the Calcutta High Court stated that the threat must constitute a “direct threat” to cause harm and “not by way of insinuation of probability or even probability of such harm.”
Interpretation of mens rea in Section 503 IPC
Like any other act to be considered criminal, there must be a mens rea for the same. Similarly, for Section 503 to take effect, there must be an “intention” on the part of the offender to cause harm to the person, property, or reputation of the victim and compel him to do an act he is not legally bound to do or cause him to “not” do an act he is legally bound to do in order to escape the execution of the threat made by the offender. It can be better elucidated using the case of Sunil Shetty Chairman Popcorn Entertainment P. Ltd. v. Puran Chauhan and Anr. (2017) The Delhi High Court in this case held that the act of threatening must be with the intention to cause alarm to the complainant, and sufficient evidence to prove the same must be placed. A mere expression in the absence of intention shall not constitute an offence under the provision.
One must be wondering why there is a need to curb such an offence. It is required since the consequences of such offences are manifold. Threatening someone induces a sense of fear and anxiety that has the potential to jeopardise the peace and stability of a society. Such an action can not only lead to emotional distress but can also lead to the infliction of bodily harm. In aggravated circumstances, it can even lead to death. Hence, in order to protect individuals and their basic human rights, such threatening behaviour must be made punishable.
This article shall deal with Section 503 with a special emphasis on the scope and nature of punishment of the said offence provided under Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
Criminal intimidation and extortion
Similarities
Both the offences involve certain common elements. Causing a threat to a person is a common ingredient in both the offences. Extortion requires the offender to intentionally put any person in fear of any injury to that person, or to any other. Similarly, criminal intimidation requires the offender to cause a threat in the mind of a person.
Differences
Despite having these similarities, there are significant differences between the two offences. Extortion is defined under Section 383 of the IPC whereas criminal intimidation is defined under Section 503 of the IPC. In case of extortion, the act is done with the intention of obtaining property from the victim. Whereas in case of criminal intimidation, this is not the only purpose.
Criminal Intimidation is said to have taken place even if there has been a constructive force; however, in case of extortion, both actual as well as constructive force is required. Punishment for extortion is a maximum 3 years imprisonment and that of criminal intimidation is 2 years.
Difference between abatement and criminal intimidation
The offence of abatement has been defined under Section 107 of the IPC. It essentially means to aid or support an individual to commit a crime.
There are three ingredients to constitute the offence of abatement:
There should be an act of instigating a person to commit an offence; or
There should be an act of engaging in an conspiracy to commit an offence; or
There should be an act of intentionally aiding a person committing.
This differs from the concept of criminal intimidation. In cases of criminal intimidation, causing fear in the mind of the victim is an essential ingredient, which is not the case in cases of abatement. Threat is an essential element which is absent in abatement. In case of abatement, both the persons are involved in the offence, whereas in the case of criminal intimidation, one is the offender and the other is the victim. In abatement, an offence is committed by the person who has abetted; thus, the person who is abetting as well as the person being abetted are committing a crime.
Difference between criminal Intimidation and duress
‘Duress’ has been mentioned in the general exceptions of the Indian Penal Code. As postulated in Section 94, it is a valid defence that can be used by a person accused of an offence. When an act has been committed in virtue of being compelled to do so by means of threat, the person shall be deemed to be in ‘duress’ during the commission of the act. Duress basically occurs when a person is forcibly compelled, restricted, or restrained to do or not do something by threat. IPC provides for the same as a valid defence by stating that nothing will be deemed an offence if it was committed by the person who was compelled by force to commit it by way of threat and if there is a reasonable fear of death that exists. It finds its roots in the legal maxim “actus me invito factus non-est meus act” which can be elucidated as meaning that a man shall not be accountable for an act that he was compelled to do against his will when his life was at stake.
Illustration:
‘P’ was caught by a thief and was compelled to open the shop locker and harm the shopkeepers using a knife because he was under a threat of instant harm. ‘P’ shall not be liable for the offence as he was under duress.
The essential elements of duress would be:
Threat of instant death;
The existence of threat during the commission of the act; or
The accused must not have voluntarily landed into such a situation.
The difference between criminal intimidation and duress lies in their ‘mens rea’ aspect. In criminal intimidation, there is an intention of the offender to use threat in order to compel the person to do an act, which he is not legally bound to do, or omit doing an act that he is entitled to do, in fear of execution of the threat. However, in duress, the person is compelled to do an act under fear of instant harm. He responds to the harm by acting under the threat with no intention to do the same.
Punishment for criminal intimidation
The punishment for criminal intimidation is provided under Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code. It provides that a person convicted under this Section would be liable for an imprisonment which may extend to two years or with fine or with both. However, such punishment shall be applicable if the offender’s action stops at threatening the victim.
If the offender goes on to cause hurt, grievous hurt or the death of the person being threatened, or causes the destruction of any property by fire, or causes an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years, the punishment shall be of a maximum of seven years imprisonment, a fine or both. Furthermore, if the accused tarnishes the chastity of a woman while committing the act of criminal intimidation, it shall attract a punishment of imprisonment up to seven years or fine or both. The Apex Court has a conflicting view when it comes to probation in case of convicts under Section 506.
In Ramnaresh Pandey v. State of Madhya Pradesh (1973), the Supreme Court had granted probation to a convict for good behaviour, who had committed criminal intimidation against a female doctor. The Supreme Court, however, took a different standpoint in the case of Siyasaran Vanshkar v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2019). In this case, the fact matrix was similar; however, the Apex Court decided to refuse the grant of probation in this case despite the good behaviour of the convict.
Recent case law
State of U.P. v. Mukhtar Ansar (2022)
It is a landmark case wherein, the complainant was a jailer performing his public duty of frisking prisoners before letting them meet anyone. As he ordered for the frisking of the respondent, the respondent got annoyed and threatened him that he would get killed and also took the pistol from one of the persons that came to meet him. The Allahabad High Court held that the evidence clearly reflects that the act of pointing a pistol by the respondent towards the complainant was with an intent to deter him from performing his public duty as a jailer using criminal force. Hence, he shall be held liable under section 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
Landmark judicial pronouncements under Section 503
Manik Taneja and Anr. v. State of Karnataka (2015)
In the case ofManik Taneja and Anr. v. State of Karnataka, the appellant was involved in a motor vehicle accident and had also paid the compensation to the person who was injured in the same. The matter was somewhat settled. However, the appellant was still called in the police station and a very unfair treatment was meted out to her by the police officers. The police officer had allegedly threatened the appellant that he would drag her to court if she did not argue with him. Being treated in such a rude manner, the appellant was aggrieved and she posted certain comments about the police officers on facebook and the way appellants were being harassed by them. One respondent filed a complaint against the posting of the comment and an FIR was registered against the appellant.
The Supreme Court laid down the essentials of the offence of criminal intimidation. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in this case held that in order for an action to amount to criminal intimidation as defined under Section 503, it must have the following ingredients:
There must be an act of ‘threatening’ to cause injury to the victim;
Intention to cause bodily harm to another;
Intention to cause damage to his reputation;
Intention to cause harm to his property;
Intention to cause threat to the body of the person or his property or his reputation in which the original person has an interest; or
Must cause alarm to the victim and cause him to do an act he is not entitled to do or cause him to omit to do an act he is legally entitled to do.
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in this case held that the act of threatening must be done with the intention to cause alarm. Mere words, in the absence of an intention to cause alarm and harm to the victim, do not constitute an offence under the section. The act of the appellants does not fall under the offence of Section 503 because they did not intend to cause alarm and were just using a public platform to raise their grievances. A public platform such as Facebook is meant for helping the public; it does not attract the ingredients of the punishment under criminal intimidation provided under Section 503 of the Indian Penal Code.
Kolla Srinivas v. State of A.P. And Anr. (2005)
In the case of Kolla Srinivas v. State of A.P. and Anr., the accused here threatened the victim of commiting suicide in order to evade the payment. The accused in the present case threatened that he would stab himself and that caused alarm on the complainant. This was done in order to desist the complainant to take any legal action against the accused. The question before the Andhra High Court was whether the threat of self-harm would satisfy the ingredient of “threat” under Section 503 of the IPC. It was held that it would amount to criminal intimidation since the intention was to cause alarm to the complainant.
Shri Vasant Waman Pradhan v. Dattatraya Vithal Salvi (2004)
In the landmark case of Shri Vasant Waman Pradhan v. Dattatraya Vithal Salvi, the question before the Bombay High Court was whether intention was necessary in order to constitute the offence of criminal intimidation. It was set out that mens rea, or the intention was a primary ingredient in order to constitute this offence.
The Bombay High Court laid down in order to establish guilt under the Section 506, it is pertinent to prove the mens rea of the accused. Unless the accused had the intention to cause fear in the mind of the victim the provision shall not apply.
Romesh Chandra Arora v. State (1960)
In the case of Romesh Chandra Arora v. State, the victim was being blackmailed by the accused by threatening to publish private pictures of the victim. The question before the court was whether the act of giving online threats would amount to committing the offence of criminal intimidation.
The Court held that harm need not necessarily be physical in nature. The accused in this case had threatened a person by stating that he would leak the nude photograph of the person’s daughter. The accused was convicted of the offence of criminal intimidation since it constituted a threat to reputation and was intended to cause alarm.
Mewa Lal v. State of Uttarakhand (2015)
In the present case of Mewa Lal v. State of Uttarakhand, the applicant allegedly entered the chamber of the principal and threatened the principal that he would kill him. The applicant was a lecturer who entered the principal’s office and allegedly started threatening him. The issue that came before the Uttaranchal High Court was whether the ingredients of Section 506 were fulfilled. The Court laid down the ingredients of Section 503 as follows:
The applicant had committed the act of threatening the applicant;
This was done by threatening to cause injury to the person, property and reputation of the complainant;
To the person on whom, the complainant is interested;
Further, there was an intention on part of the offender to cause alarm to the complainant or the person the complainant may be interested in;
Cause the complainant to do an act, he is not legally bound to do; or
Deter him from doing an act that he is legally bound to do;
In order to avoid the execution of such a threat made by the offender to meet their demand.
The Uttaranchal High Court after carefully perusing the FIR held that the action by the applicant only fulfils the first ingredient of the offence i.e., threatening the complainant and rest of the ingredients of 503 were not fulfilled. Therefore, the alleged act by the applicant, does not make the offence under section 503 applicable in the present case.
Conclusion
Crimes such as these, breed a climate of fear and that deeply impacts the psychology of anyone who is a victim to them. Compelling someone to act in a certain way or in the whims and fancies of the offender ultimately, violates the victim’s fundamental right of freely expressing himself or being at his own liberty. This causes the wellbeing of the society being compromised and hampers its overall growth. An environment of constantly living in fear and anxiety builds mistrusts amongst the people and causes them to not stand for enforcing their own rights. The provision for criminal intimidation guarantees the safety of person, property and reputation to individuals. It makes sure that a person is not made to act against his or her will by creating fear in their mind. This provision acts as a preventive method which prevents an offender to force another person from committing a crime. Threat plays the key deciding factor in case of this offence. However it should be kept in mind that the threat posed should be practically possible to perform in nature which genuinely creates fear in the mind of the victim. The punishment provision for this offence has been designed in a manner which classifies simple intimidation as well as aggravated form of criminal intimidation which provides for greater punishment then the former category.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Is the offence of criminal intimidation bailable?
Yes, it is a non-cognizable and bailable offence.
Can the charges of criminal intimidation be dropped if a compromise is reached?
Yes, since it is a compoundable offence, the charges of criminal intimidation can be dropped if a compromise is arrived at.
Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:
In the corporate sector worldwide, the term acquisition signifies acquiring businesses from another, to get benefit of the synergies, whether it is related with valuation, market size, geographical access, assets (tangible as well as intangible), products etc. The acquisition between Lenovo & Motorola Mobility (Motorola) took place in 2014. The acquisition was announced on 30th January, 2014 and it was successfully completed on 30th October, 2014. This article discusses the acquisition between the two giants, with an emphasis on how it has changed the corporate world.
All you need to know about acquisition in the corporate world
An acquisition is a corporate restructuring process by means of which one company purchases or acquires most or all of another company’s shares in order to gain control of that company. Purchasing more than 50% of a target firm’s stock alongside other assets makes room for the acquirer company to make decisions in regards to the newly acquired assets. The acquirer company in such cases will not have to take approval of the acquired company’s shareholders. Acquisitions are a frequent process in the corporate domain and can occur either with or without the approval of the acquired company.
Objectives of acquisition
Acquisition is generally favoured by companies for the following reasons:
Building economies of scale;
Creating diversification in market approach;
Greater the market share;
Make room for increased synergy;
Carrying out cost reductions;
Making entry in the global market; and
Can be used as a growth strategy.
The companies in the role : Lenovo and Motorola Mobility
Lenovo is an American-Chinese multinational technology company specialising in designing, manufacturing, and marketing consumer electronics, personal computers, software, business solutions, and related services. As of 2021, it is the world’s largest personal computer vendor by unit sales.
Motorola Mobility is also an American consumer electronics manufacturer that was formed on 4th January 2011, and solely deals in producing smartphones and other mobile devices running Android. In May 2012, Google acquired Motorola Mobility for US$12.5 billion. In a short span of time, Google decided to sell the business to Lenovo for approx. US$2.91 billion, as has been discussed hereunder.
Rationale behind the acquisition between Motorola Mobility and Lenovo
Lenovo had mentioned that, as a personal computer manufacturer, they were planning to enter the smartphone market, which was then considered to be the fastest growing industry in the world. This was one of the primary reasons why Lenovo went ahead and acquired Motorola Mobility. In addition to the same, Lenovo was willing to mark their presence in North America and Latin America, as well as a foothold in Western Europe; therefore, the acquisition was required.
With this acquisition, Lenovo intended to explore the opportunities in emerging markets around the world. Lenovo was very optimistic about the robust demand for smartphones around the world, which eventually turned out to be the fastest growing industry in the future. They also wanted to benefit from the intellectual property rights of Motorola Mobility to enter the market. Further, Lenovo declared that they will operate Motorola Mobility as a wholly owned subsidiary, with the headquarters remaining in Chicago. Through this acquisition, Lenovo became the third largest brand globally.
Terms & conditions governing the acquisition
It is interesting to note that the majority of ownership over the Motorola Mobility patent portfolio (including present patent applications and invention disclosures) and Advanced Technology and Projects group kept lying with Google itself; however, Motorola received a licence to use the portfolio of patents & other intellectual property rights. Along with the same, Lenovo was able to get the following as a consequence of this acquisition with Motorola Mobility:
Lenovo received the brand and trademark of Motorola and its portfolio of smartphones such as Moto X, Moto G and the DROID™ Ultra series;
Future product roadmap; and
It also received over 2000 patent assets out of 17500+ patents.
Having a view of above terms & conditions, it can be said that the said acquisition was purely based on to reap the benefits from intellectual property rights which were in the name of Motorola or Google, as Lenovo being the manufacturer of PCs, wanted to explore its smartphone business in emerging markets such as North America, Latin America, etc.
Deal size between Lenovo and Motorola Mobility
The acquisition was valued at approximately US$2.91 billion (subject to certain post-close adjustments), which was divided into approximately US$660 million in cash and 519,107,215 newly issued ordinary shares of Lenovo stock, with an aggregate value of US$750 million, representing about 4.7 percent of Lenovo’s shares outstanding, which were transferred to Google at close. The remaining US$1.5 billion was paid to Google by Lenovo in the form of a three-year promissory note. A separate cash compensation of approximately US$228 million was paid by Lenovo to Google, primarily for the cash and working capital held by Motorola at the time of closing.
Regulatory compliances
All the regulatory compliances were satisfied, including clearances from competition authorities in the U.S., China, the EU, Brazil, and Mexico, as well as the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS).
Future prospects of the acquisition between Lenovo and Motorola Mobility
Lenovo was expected to sell more than 100 million devices, including smartphones and tablets, during that particular year when the acquisition took place. Motorola was enjoying a tremendous position in the mobile industry and launched its new mobile phone, the Moto 360, which was highly capturing consumer attention.
Lenovo’s management was very confident about the use of the Motorola brand and exploring the opportunities in the US market, which they probably didn’t have access to. The reason behind the deal was the emphasis on access to the US market and the earlier success of the IBM deal. On personnel aspects, Lenovo had retained 3500 employees, out of which 2800 were based in the US, who were responsible for the design, engineering, sales, and support of Motorola’s outstanding devices.
The deal was a win-win situation for both Lenovo and Google, as the latter kept ownership of the majority of intellectual property rights and got rid of the hardware business, which was not so profitable, while the former got a strategic relationship with the owners of Android.
Post acquisition status of both the companies
After the completion of the acquisition, the toughest time for Lenovo had started, as some reports stated that Lenovo was not able to revive the loss making company and slipped to 8th position from 3rd in 2016, eventually declaring an annual loss for the first time since 2009.
In 2016, their market share decreased to 2% in China, where it was 12% before the deal, and Motorola slipped to 6th position, where it was in 5th position in the US. Consequently, there was a reduction of 3200 people not involved in manufacturing, resulting in savings of $650 million in the second half of this year and about $1.35 billion on an annual basis.
Also, in a press-release dated 3rd February 2016, Lenovo stated that after reducing costs as mentioned above, it achieved its stated goals of achieving breakeven in its mobile business 4-6 quarters after the close of the Motorola deal.
There were ample reasons for the fall in sales and market size of Lenovo as well as Motorola products, which were as follows:
Less spending for the marketing of the products;
Launched Moto X at high price ($600-$700) which was similar to Apple;
Keeping the two brand separately i.e Lenovo & Motorola;
Lack of consensus between employees and management;
For making the Motorola profitable, Lenovo introduced the Motorola’s phone in China where the things were not turned into the favour; and
Different geo-graphical technologies that were meant for China didn’t work for the U.S.
Conclusion
After consideration of the above, it can be said that Lenovo overestimated its power to reap the benefits from loss making entities and focused on access in particular markets. The smartphone market is so volatile that if one leaves something or does not compete with others, then it becomes history and eventually lags behind. Of course, no one could forget the case of Nokia, which was the frontrunner in mobile phones. They didn’t change their strategy, resulting in their lagging behind and vanishing from this volatile market. To reap the benefits at the highest level in the tech industry, basically in smartphones, one has to think from every angle and be ready for the change, if required. It’s not easy to run a tech company by applying the same approach that Lenovo used in the IBM deal. On the very first day when the deal was announced, Lenovo’s share price was badly affected and fell by approx 16.5%. The share of Lenovo also got affected when employees of Motorola retrenched later. On the journey to mark its presence in the US market, Lenovo lost its presence in China as well as globally. Of course, there were several reasons behind this failure, but somehow managed the situation in 2017 to some extent. At last, Lenovo made the deductions in its costs, used the said amount in branding, etc., and achieved success. It is still running the Motorola Mobility as a going concern till date even sailing through the toughest time, be it reduction of manpower, and keep falling their market share, making losses, falling share prices in the stock market etc. Out of all odds, it proved how to run a loss making entity and turn it around to be profitable for the acquirer. As of fiscal 2022, Lenovo had robust revenue of US$70 billion and net income of US$2 billion.
Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:
Before we get into this bill, let’s get some basic knowledge about what data protection and data privacy are. Even though our right to privacy is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution of India, it is still recognised under Article 21. The same goes for data privacy. Data privacy is how much a person can control their data from third-party intervention. Meanwhile, data protection is focused on protecting the personal data of a person from unauthorised access.
Let’s understand this better with an illustration. It’s 2023, and most of us have Instagram on our mobiles. You may have noticed that the app will try to get access to your phone number, location, contacts, E-mail ID, etc. But it is totally up to our discretion whether to allow or deny access. This right to control our data at our will is known as data privacy. Even if we decide to give access to our data, Instagram has the responsibility to secure and protect it at all costs. This is known as data protection.
The 2022 Bill mainly focuses on processing the digital data of an individual in a manner that recognises both the right of individuals to protect their data and the need to process personal data for lawful purposes.
New terms and definitions under the Digital Personal Data Protection Bill, 2022
The current bill has introduced certain new terms, replacing the ones in the previous bill. Like-
Data principal: It refers to an individual to whom the personal data relates.
Data fiduciary: It refers to a person or group of persons who determines the purpose and means of processing an individual’s personal data.
Profiling: It refers to a method of processing the data by which the data fiduciary can predict the behaviour and interests of the data principal.
Have you ever noticed that after you search for a product on Amazon, you get the same “product-related ads” popping up on Google whenever you enter a blog or any other site? Now that’s what’s called profiling.
And in the above-given illustration, you are the data principal, and Amazon and Google are data fiduciaries.
What is meant by consent
Consent plays a significant role in data privacy since it is our personal data that we share. The current Bill focuses more on the data principal’s consent, which is one of the good things about this Bill.
The Bill clearly states that the data principal has to, by clear affirmative action, signify to process his data for a specific purpose. For an individual under the age of 18, their consent will be provided by their legal guardian. Additionally, the data principal has the freedom to withdraw his consent at any time, but the consequences of that will be borne by the data principal himself. The Bill further says that the data fiduciary should stop processing the personal data of the data principal once he/she withdraws his/her consent.
Let’s say you have subscribed to a daily news service through email. As part of the subscription, you have given your email and phone number to the service provider. If you later withdraw your consent to process your data, then the service provider must stop processing your data immediately. However, the services will also be terminated.
What is meant by deemed consent
The new Data Protection Bill introduces the concept of deemed consent. It means that there are certain circumstances under which the data principal is deemed to have given consent to the processing of their data. In simple terms, deemed consent means presumed to have consented.
If you order a pizza online, then you will have given your phone number and address so that the company can deliver the pizza to your doorstep. In this case, the pizza company did not explicitly request your consent to let them know your number and address. This is because it is presumed that you gave your consent the moment you provided the information.
Other circumstances under which the data principal is deemed to have given consent to the processing of his data include:
● For the performance of any function under the law and the benefit of the data principal;
● For compliance with any judgement or order; or
● In case of a medical emergency involving a threat to life, etc.
Obligations of data fiduciary
As mentioned previously, a data fiduciary must protect the data acquired from the data principal, but the obligations do not stop there.
Some of the other obligations of the data fiduciary are given below:
To make reasonable efforts to ensure that the data they have collected is accurate and precise;
To inform the Data Protection Board of India in case of a data breach;
To take appropriate measure both technical and organisational;
To remove or erase the data principal’s data once the purpose for which the data was collected has been fulfilled. This is known as storage limitation. The concept of storage limitation will not apply in the case of processing by government entities. For example, let’s say you have decided to delete your Facebook account. In this case, Facebook should stop retaining your data after you delete the account;
It is the data fiduciaries duty to comply with the law;
It is the data fiduciaries duty to share, transfer, or transmit a personal data to a data fiduciary after taking consent of the data principal
If anyone’s data is breached he must inform the board and the principal whose data has been breached;
The data fiduciary must take reasonable steps to ensure that a data is kept safely and is not shared with any other data fiduciary or anyone else; and
To obtain parental consent before processing the data of a child
Rights of a data principal
Right to information about personal data
There are certain things that can be obtained by the data principal from the data fiduciary upon request. Such as,
A summary of processing activities undertaken by the data fiduciary with the data principal’s data; and
To provide the identities of all the data fiduciaries with whom the data has been shared.
To get the identities of all the data fiduciaries who are handling the data.
Right to correction and erasure of personal data
Upon the request of the data principal, the date fiduciary must:
Correct any inaccurate data of the data principal;
Update any new data of the data principal;
Complete a data principal’s incomplete data; and
Erase the personal data of the principal.
Right to grievance redressal
In the case of any grievance, the data principal can register the grievance with the data fiduciary. And if the data principal is not satisfied with the data fiduciary’s response, he can approach the data protection board and file a complaint.
Right to nominate
The data principal has the right to appoint any individual to exercise the rights of the data principal in case of his death or incapacity.
Registering complaint with the Board
If the data principal is not satisfied with the response of the data fiduciary or the response has not been received within the stipulated time period, he/she may register a complaint with the board against him.
Duties of a data principal
Not only the data fiduciary but also the data principal have certain duties to abide by under the new Bill. A data principal has to provide only authentic information and should not try to impersonate another person by providing false data. Non-compliance with these duties will be a punishable offence.
Functions of the Data Protection Board of India
The Central Government will establish a Data Protection Board of India to make sure that people are complying with the Act and to take strict action or impose penalties for non-compliance.
Some of the key functions of the board are given below:
● Directing the data fiduciary to take necessary steps in case of a data breach;
● Looking into non-compliance with the Act and imposing penalties; and
● To conduct proceedings with respect to the complaint filed.
Every person must comply with the board’s orders, which are enforceable as if they were decrees issued by a civil court.There is no appellate authority, and any appeal against the Board’s order will only lie with the High Court.
Penalties under the Digital Personal Data Protection Bill, 2022
Here’s a tabular representation of the penalties under the new Bill:
S. No
Subject Matter
Penalty
1.
In case of failure of protection of personal data by the data processor or data fiduciary; under Section 9(4) of the Bill
Penalty up to Rs. 250 crore.
2.
In case of failure to notify the Board and the affected data principal or principals in case of a personal data breach; under Section 9(5) of the Bill.
Penalty up to Rs. 200 crore.
3.
In case of non-fulfilment of additional obligations in relation to children; under Section 10 of the Act
Penalty up to Rs. 200 crore.
4.
In case of non-fulfilment of additional obligations of Significant Data Fiduciary; under Section 11 of the Act.
Penalty up to Rs. 150 crore.
5.
In case of non compliance with Section 16 of this Act.
Penalty up to Rs. 10 thousand.
6.
In case of non-compliance with the provisions of the Act other than those listed under (1) and (5) and any rule made thereunder.
Penalty up to Rs. 50 crore.
Exemptions provided under the Digital Personal Data Protection Bill, 2022
The new Bill states that there are certain circumstances in which the rights of the data principal and obligations of the data fiduciary will not apply. These circumstances include;
● Enforcing any legal right or claim;
● For the performance of any judicial or quasi-judicial function; or
● For the purpose of investigation or prosecution.
The Central Government also exempts certain activities from the application of the provision, such as in cases when;
● Processing of data for statistical and research purposes; or
● Processing our data by the government entities for the interest of sovereignty and integrity of India and to maintain public order.
Key issues and concerns raised
It is true that the bill primarily focuses on the protection of one’s data and imposes huge penalties for non-compliance with the Act. But there are lots of exemptions and vagueness when it comes to data privacy. For instance, Section 18 talks about exemptions under which the rights of the data principal will not apply. The Section gives power to government entities to process one’s data without the consent of the data principal or approval of any judiciary body for the purpose of the security and integrity of the state. Even though it is for a reasonable cause, the Section fails to state what happens to our data after the purpose has been fulfilled. What is the threshold limit for processing one’s data? Whether the government entity retains our data after the purpose has been fulfilled? If the government still retains our data after the purpose has been met, then it violates our right to privacy.
Another issue is the ban on profiling (tracking of one’s behaviour and interests) when it comes to children. Although it is a good initiative, it seems like a blanket ban. This is because it is not possible to recommend specific ads, suggestions, or videos without tracking one’s interests and behaviour. For example, let’s take YouTube Kids or Netflix Kids, which are dedicated to children. These platforms still use tracking mechanisms to recommend media to children.
The new Bill indirectly gives huge power to the centre. For instance, the composition of the board is not mentioned in a detailed manner, meaning (i) the qualification of members, (ii) the process of selection, (iii) the terms and conditions of appointment and service, and (iv) the removal of members have not been specified. This ultimately means that the Central Government can appoint whomever they want, which makes the board less independent.
And lastly, the Bill has not mentioned anything about our “right to be forgotten” or the “right to data portability.” Even in the recent case,Dr.Krishna Menon vs. High Court Of Kerala (2022), Kerala High Court held that, based on the facts and circumstances of the case and the duration involved in relation to the crime, the right to be forgotten can be invoked. However, the new Bill failed to talk about this.
The Personal Data Protection Bill of 2019 vs The Digital Personal Data Protection Bill, 2022
The 2019 Bill contains 90 sections, while the 2022 Bill has only 30 sections. Also, the new Bill only applies to digital data and not manual data. The current Bill imposes penalties not only on data fiduciaries but also on data principals. If a data principal does comply with his duties as mentioned in the Act, then a penalty of Rs. 10,000 will be imposed.
Another major difference is the cross-border data flow. The current Bill is too vague and has made it easy to transfer personal data outside India. While the 2019 Bill asked for explicit consent from the data fiduciary and further requested an adequate level of protection for such data.
Conclusion
It’s 2023, and everyone is transferring their personal data digitally/online on a daily basis. Like booking a hotel, downloading social media apps, subscribing to an OTT platform, etc. Therefore, the concepts of data protection and privacy become crucial without question. Overall, the 2022 Bill tries its best when it comes to data protection, but at the same time, the clauses in the Act are too vague when it comes to data privacy. The Bill is not perfect, but it still contains many crucial provisions that are needed for data privacy and protection.
Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:
This article is written by Nishka Kamath, a graduate of Nalanda Law College, University of Mumbai. In this article, the author has discussed the types of meetings in company law in great detail. Further, the article also gives an overview of the significance of conducting company law meetings with pointers including the definitions, importance, general provisions, etc. Furthermore, for a better understanding of the provisions of different company meetings, an attempt is made to give a brief description of some of the crucial company law meeting judgements.
It has been published by Rachit Garg.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Have you ever wondered how many types of meetings are held in a company? Or under which Act are such meetings conducted? Or why exactly are company meetings conducted? This article is an attempt to answer all such questions.
Numerous meetings are convened in a company, which are generally divided into members’ meetings, directors’ meetings, and other meetings. These meetings are carried on to attain different goals, and each meeting has its own distinct set of rules and regulations. These rules have to be abided by the company, and meetings have to be conducted in accordance with such set meetings. These meetings play a major role in the decision-making process of the company.
Let us have a look at the types of company meetings along with their salient features, importance, objectives, and landmark judgements, inter alia.
Company meeting : an overview
A company meeting means two or more individuals coming together to carry out a legitimate business or to take decisions on the same, like any other group of people flocking together for a particular purpose. Now, in order to carry out the business of the company properly, it becomes necessary for the directors and shareholders of companies to meet as often as necessary and to take unanimous decisions based on their viewpoints and discussions. Simply put, it is crucial for companies to hold meetings for the effective functioning of the company. These meetings hold great importance in the decision-making process.
Moreover, shareholders, who are the owners of the company, have the right to have proper discussions on the affairs of the company and to further exercise their rights in matters relating to the ongoing activities and future of the company. Conducting meetings provides this chance to the shareholders and also gives them an opportunity to keep a check on the activities of the board of directors, as the directors are obligated to adhere to the decisions taken in the meetings of shareholders. Also, the management of the company is vested in the hands of shareholders; hence, it is important that they meet on a regular basis to take unanimous decisions and function effectively as a team.
Now let us have a look at some of the important aspects of company meetings.
Meaning and definition of company meetings
There is no definition of the term “meeting” per se in the Companies Act, 2013; in plain language, a company can be defined as two or more individuals coming together, gathering, or assembling either by prior notice or unanimous decision for discussing and carrying out some legitimate activities related to business. A company meeting can be said to be a concurrence or meeting of a quorum of members to carry out ordinary or special business and take decisions on important matters of the company.
Why are company meetings held
Before we read about the types of company meetings, let’s take a look at why exactly company meetings are conducted.
Control management function
Company meetings play a crucial role in controlling the management functions of a company.
Control the affairs of the company
In a company, the directors are accountable to the shareholders. Directors have been entrusted with the duty to run the business and manage the day-to-day affairs of the company. By holding meetings, the affairs of the company are controlled.
Future policies
Through meetings, the past policies and experiences of a company can be discussed, and new future policies can be fixed. As stated above, directors are answerable to shareholders, so via such meetings, the shareholders can learn about the affairs of the company. The rights of shareholders include:
Inquiring regarding the affairs of the company,
Criticising the function of the company,
Have effective control on the board.
Important definitions of company meetings
In the case of Sharp v. Dawes (1971), a meeting is defined as “an assembly of people for a lawful purpose” or “the coming together of at least two persons for any lawful purpose.”
Further, according to P.K. Ghosh, “any gathering, assembly, or coming together of two or more persons for the transaction of some lawful business of common concern is called meeting.”
Moreover, according to K. Kishore, “a concurrence or coming together of at least a quorum of members by previous notice or mutual agreement for transaction business for a common interest is a meeting.”
Essence in context with the aforementioned definitions
From the above definitions, we can infer the following:
Number of individuals
In a meeting, there must be two or more individuals. The number of members attending the meeting may be small, large, or extremely large, depending on the type of meeting. In the case of a committee meeting, the total count of members may be small, whereas in the case of an annual general meeting of any public company, the total number may be large, and in the case of public meetings, the total count may be very huge.
Definite place
There must be a specific place for the meeting. In the case of official meetings, the meeting must be conducted in the office. Further, in the case of big meetings that entail a huge involvement of members, like the annual general meeting of a public company, the meeting can be held in a public hall. Also, public meetings can be held in public halls, on open grounds, or even on roads, if required.
Fixed date and time
While conducting a meeting, it is necessary to decide on a date and time. In the case of official meetings, the date chosen to conduct the meeting is often a working day, and the time is within office hours; however, there can be restrictions in matters related to the date and time under the Companies Act.
Discussion
There has to be some discussion while conducting the meeting, meaning the individuals in the meeting must put forth their viewpoints and opinions on the agenda of the meeting.
Predetermined topics
Usually, in company meetings, the topics or subject matter of the meeting are already notified to the participants, so they can come prepared with their viewpoints on the same.
Decisions
The decisions for the agenda are generally taken in the meeting itself, as getting to a conclusion is the main objective of conducting the meeting. The decisions occurring in the meeting are binding on the members of the company, irrespective of whether they were able to attend the meeting or not, were present or not, or even if they agree with or oppose the inference thus reached.
The decisions are taken either through votes or in the form of resolutions. Also, there are distinct ways of voting. Usually, decisions are not taken at public meetings, and if they are, they are not binding in any manner whatsoever.
Types
Meetings can be of different types, namely:
Private,
Public, or
International (like U.N.O.)
The types of company meetings, which can be private or public, are discussed in depth below.
General notes
The meeting does not take place automatically. A meeting has to be called or convened. In simple words, a notice has to be sent to every individual with the authority to attend the meeting.
In the case of a public meeting, general publicity is necessary. Every type of meeting has its own procedure to be followed.
An accidental meeting of two or more individuals will not be referred to as a meeting.
The secretary is responsible for calling and informing the members and conducting the meeting.
Importance of company meetings
Meetings hold great value in our daily social lives. This is a democratic process that is quite essential in the decision making of any organisation, be it a company, a club, or even an association. Further, group discussions play a major role in:
Introducing changes in the company,
Decision making, and
Improves the relations between an employer and his employee.
The object and methods of conducting different types of meetings are different. Each of them is discussed in detail in the upcoming passages.
Further, the following are some noteworthy pointers on the importance of holding company meetings:
Meetings are a crucial part of managing a company, as stated under the Companies Act, 1956.
The consent of the members of the company, commonly known as shareholders, is obtained at the general meetings held by the company.
If any mistake is committed by the board of directors, the shareholders have the authority to rectify it at the meetings of the company.
Shareholder’s meetings are held by the shareholders to give a final say on their decisions on the measures taken by the board of directors.
Meetings help enlighten the shareholders to know about the recent happenings and procedures of the company and enable them to deliberate on some matters.
There are several criteria that have to be fulfilled in matters relating to the calling, convening, and conduct of the meetings.
Components of a valid company meeting
A company meeting generally consists of the following:
Participants
The first and foremost requirement of a meeting is to have participants. In the case of a private meeting, only the individuals having the authority to attend the meeting, like the members of the organisation, the committee, the sub-committee and the people who have received an invitation, can participate. At times, in the event of the non-availability of such a person, he has the right to send his representative or proxy on their behalf. Whereas, in the case of public meetings, the general public has the authority to attend them.
Chairman
For a valid company meeting, there has to be a chairman at every meeting who has the authority and duty to carry on the meeting effectively.
Secretary
The secretary of the organisation, committee, sub-committee etc., is entrusted with several duties right from the beginning to the very end of the meeting. He plays a crucial role in carrying out such meetings.
Invitees
Apart from those who have the authority to attend the meeting, there are some people who are invited, for instance, the press reporters.
Material elements
Another major component of the meeting involves material elements. The material elements include:
The sitting arrangement,
The materials for writing, etc.
General provisions to know about conducting valid company meetings
Proper authority to convene meetings
In order for a meeting to be regarded as valid, it must be called by a proper authority, like the board of directors. In a valid board meeting, the decision to convene a general meeting and issue notice in this regard must be taken by passing a resolution.
Notice
For a meeting to be conducted properly, a proper notice must be issued by the proper authority. It means that such a notice must be drafted properly according to the provisions laid down under the Companies Act, 2013. Also, such a notice must be duly served on all the members who are entitled to attend and vote at the meeting. Moreover, the valid notice of the company must specifically mention the place, the day, the time, and the statement of the business to be transacted at the meeting.
Quorum
A quorum is defined as the minimum number of members that are required to be present as mentioned under the provisions of a particular meeting. Any business transaction carried out at a meeting without a quorum shall be deemed to be invalid. The main object of having a quorum is to avoid taking decisions by a small minority of members that may not be accepted by the vast majority. Every company meeting has its own number of quorum, the same has been discussed under separate headings in the upcoming passages.
Agenda
The agenda can be described as the list of businesses to be transacted while conducting any meeting. An agenda is important for carrying out a business meeting in a systematic manner and in a proper, predetermined order. An agenda, along with a notice of the meeting, is usually sent to all the members who are entitled to attend a meeting. The discussion in the meeting has to be conducted in the same manner as stated in the agenda, and changes can be made in the order only with the proper consent of the members at the meeting.
Minutes
The minutes of the meetings contain a just and accurate summary of the proceedings of the meeting. Minutes of the meetings have to be prepared and signed within 30 days of the conclusion of the meeting. Further, the minutes books must be kept at the registered office of the company or any place where the board of directors has given their approval.
Proxy
The term ‘proxy’ can be used to refer to a person who is chosen by a shareholder of a company to represent him at a general meeting of the company. Further, it also refers to the process through which such an individual is named and permitted to attend the meeting.
Resolutions
Business transactions in company meetings are carried out in the form of resolutions. There are two kinds of resolutions, namely:
Ordinary resolution, and
Special resolution.
Types of company meetings
Company meetings are majorly divided into three categories, and the three categories are further divided into subcategories, which are again divided into some categories. Let us have a look at the categories.
Meetings of shareholders or members
General meeting which is further divided into:
Statutory meeting,
Annual General Meeting,
Extraordinary General Meeting.
Class meeting.
Meetings of Directors
Board of directors meeting,
Committee of directors meeting.
Other meetings that are categorised as:
Debenture holders meeting,
Creditors meeting, and
Creditors and contributors meeting.
Before we dive deep into the nitty-gritty of each of the categories, here is a pictorial representation of the types of company meetings for your better understanding-
Now that we have seen the pictorial representation of company meetings, let us have a look at each of the meetings in a more detailed manner.
Meetings of shareholders or members
The first main type of meeting is a meeting of shareholders or members of the company. It is further divided into two categories, namely:
General meeting, and
Class meeting.
The first category is further divided into three subcategories, each of which is discussed in detail below.
General meeting
The general meeting is subdivided into three categories. Let us have a look at the nitty-gritty of each of them.
Statutory meeting
Please note: Before the enactment of the Companies Act, 2013, the requirements laid down for statutory meetings and reports under Section 165 were legit. However, after its enactment, the same has been dropped.
The following is just for the readers’ information.
What is statutory meeting
A statutory meeting is a type of general meeting that must be held by every company limited by shares and every company limited by guarantee with a share capital within not less than a month and not more than six months from the date it was incorporated. Private companies are exempt from conducting a statutory meeting. In this meeting, a report known as the ‘statutory report’ is discussed by the directors of the company.
Which companies do not need to conduct a statutory meeting
The following companies do not have any obligation to conduct a statutory meeting:
Private company,
Company limited by guarantee having no share capital,
Unlimited liability company,
A public company that was registered as a private company earlier,
A company that has been deemed as a public company under Sec. 43 A.
What is notice of the meeting
The board of directors of a company is duty-bond to forward a notice of the meeting to all the shareholders or members of the company. This has to be done at least 21 days prior to holding the meeting, and an explicit mention of ‘statutory meeting’ of the company has to be made in the notice. If the board of directors does not name it the ‘statutory meeting’, it will be a breach of the provision.
What is statutory report
Now that a mention of the statutory report was made above, you might wonder, what exactly is it? Let’s find out.
The board of directors is obliged to forward a report known as the ‘statutory report’ at least 21 days before the date of the statutory meeting. A copy of the report has to be forwarded to the registrar for registration. This report has to be drafted by the board of directors of the company and certified and amended by at least two of them.
What are the particulars of a statutory report
Under Section 165(3) of the Companies Act, 1956, a prior mention of the contents of a statutory report has been made; it says the report must contain:
The total number of fully paid-up and partly paid-up shares allotted
The sum of the amount of cash received by the company with respect to the shares;
Information on the receipts, distinguishing them on the basis of their sources and mentioning the amount spent for commission, brokerage, etc.
The names of the directors, auditors, managers and secretaries along with their address and occupation, and changes of their names and addresses, if any.
The particulars of agreements that are to be presented in the meeting for approval, with suggested amendments, if any.
The justifications in cases where any underwriting agreement was not executed.
The arrears due on calls from directors and other individuals.
The details on the amount of honoraria paid to the directors, managers and others for selling shares or debentures.
What is the procedure to carry out a statutory meeting
Now that we know about the statutory report and its particulars, you might wonder what the proper procedure is for conducting a statutory meeting. The answer is in the below pointers.
The board of directors has to send a statutory report to every member of the company, as mentioned above. The members who attend this meeting may carry out discussions on matters relating to the formation of the company or matters that are incorporated in the statutory report. Below are some of the points one must note:
While conducting the statutory meeting, no resolution can be taken.
The main motive of conducting such a meeting is to familiarise all the members of the company with matters relating to the development and origination of the company.
The shareholders, perhaps, the members of the company, will receive particulars relating to the following:
Shares taken up,
Money received,
Contracts entered into,
Preliminary expenses incurred, etc.
The members or shareholders also have the opportunity to carry out a discussion on several business ideas and ways to prosper the business, along with the future prospects of the company.
Moreover, if a decision is not reached at the statutory meeting, an adjournment meeting is called.
According to Section 433 of the Companies Act, 1956, if the company errs in submitting the statutory report or in conducting the statutory meeting within the specified time, it may be subjected to winding up.
However, the court, instead of directly winding up the company, has the authority to instruct the company to submit a statutory report and conduct a statutory meeting, along with levying a fine on the individuals who erred in conducting the meeting.
What will be the effect of non-compliance with the provisions on conducting a statutory meeting
The following are the repercussions of not complying with the provisions on conducting a statutory meeting:
If there is any mistake in complying with the provision for holding a statutory meeting under Section 165, the directors or other officers of the company who are at fault will be liable to pay a fine that is extendable up to ₹500.
Under Section 43(6) of the Companies Act, 1956, in case the company errs in conducting the statutory meeting or if the statutory report is not in compliance with the provisions of the Act, the company may be compulsorily wound up if the court orders the same. However, under Section 443(3) of the Companies Act, 1956, the court may pass an order to conduct a statutory meeting or to send the statutory report, as the case may be, instead of winding up the company.
Before we study the annual general meeting (AGM) and extraordinary general meeting (EGM), let us have a look at the key differences between them in a tabular format. This is done for a better understanding of the topics.
Basis
Annual general meeting (AGM)
Extraordinary general meeting (EGM)
What is it?
An annual general meeting, commonly known as an AGM, is a regular meeting held annually.
An extraordinary general meeting (EGM), is a meeting other than an AGM.
Applicability
AGMs are applicable to all the companies.
Similarly, EGMs are applicable to all companies.
Time of holding the meeting
An AGM has to be held within six months of the close of the financial year.
An EGM can be held at any time.
Purpose
An AGM is held to serve the following purposes: Electing the directors of the company,Passing of annual accounts, Declaring the dividends, and Appointing auditors.
Whereas, an EGM is to be held for any matter for which a proper notice is given.
Who may call such a meeting?
The board of directors has the authority to call such a meeting.
The board of directors, along with requisitionists, have the authority to call such a meeting.
Repercussions of default in conducting such a meeting
The tribunal may call and impose a fine in case a company defaults in holding an AGM in a requisite manner.
Similarly, the tribunal may call and impose a fine in case a company errs in holding an EGM in the prescribed manner.
Annual General Meeting (AGM)
The annual general meeting is defined under Section 96 of the Companies Act, 2013. As the name suggests, an annual general meeting is one of the general meetings held once a year. As per Section 96 of the Companies Act, 2013, all companies have to hold an AGM within the stipulated time. An AGM provides a chance for the members of the company to review the workings of the company and express their opinions on the management and workings of the company.
Purpose of conducting an annual general meeting
The main purpose of conducting an AGM is to transact the ordinary business of the company. Ordinary business includes the following:
Consideration of financial statements and reports from the directors and auditors.
Making declarations on dividends.
Appointing a replacement of director or directors in place of those who have retired.
Appointing and setting up the amount of remuneration for the auditors of the company.
It also includes annual accounts, crucial reports, and audits.
Importance of conducting an annual general meeting
Under corporate law, an annual general meeting is regarded as one of the most important institutions for protecting the members of the company. It is at this meeting— even though it is held only once in a fiscal year- that the members of the company get the opportunity to question the management on matters relating to the following:
The affairs of the company,
The business of the company, and
The accounts of the company.
It is only at this meeting that the members of the company have the chance not to re-elect those directors in whom they have lost faith or confidence. Further, as auditors also retire at this meeting, members of the company have another opportunity to think about the re-election of these auditors.
Last but not least, it is at the AGM that members disclose the amount of dividend payable by the company. While talking about dividends, it may be noted that the board of directors makes recommendations on the amount of dividend, whereas the members at the AGM declare the dividend. Further, the dividend cannot surpass the recommended amount by the board of directors.
The three rules of conducting an annual general meeting
The meeting must be conducted on an annual basis.
A maximum duration of 15 months is permitted between holding two annual general meetings.
The meeting must be conducted within six months of preparing the balance sheet.
If any of these rules are not complied with, the same will be said to be an offence under the Companies Act, 2013. It has been discussed in the upcoming passages.
Notice of conducting the annual general meeting
The company has to send a clear 21 days’ notice to its members to conduct the annual general meeting. The notice must mention the day, date, and location of the meeting, along with the hour at which it is decided to be held. The notice should explicitly mention the business to be conducted at the AGM. A company is obligated to send the AGM notice to the following:
All the members of the company, including the legal representatives of a deceased member and the assignee of an insolvent member.
The statutory auditors of the company.
All the directors of the company.
The notice can be sent either by speed or registered mail or even through electronic means like email.
Date, time, and place of conducting an annual general meeting
Usually, an annual general meeting can be conducted at any time, provided it is during business hours (between 9 am and 6 pm) and the day of the meeting is not a national holiday. Now, talking about the location of the meeting, it can be held either at any pre-decided place within the area of the jurisdiction of the registered office or at the registered office itself.
Below are some of the noteworthy pointers in context to the date, time, and place of holding an annual general meeting:
A public company or a private company that acts as a subsidiary of a public company may determine the timing of the meeting as per the articles of association.
At a general meeting, a resolution can also be passed for determining the time of holding subsequent meetings.
In the case of private companies, the time and location are determined by passing a resolution at any of the meetings.
For a private company meeting, the location may not be within the area of jurisdiction of the registered office of the company.
Further, as per Section 101 of the 2013 Act, if any member files an application in case a company errs in holding an annual general meeting, the time frame for notice to call for the meeting can be reduced to less than 21 days (21 days is the time frame to send a notice to call for an annual general meeting) with the agreement of members who are entitled to vote.
First annual general meeting and relaxations
As per Section 96 of the Companies Act, 2013, a general meeting must be held annually, as the name suggests. It is mandatory that all companies hold such meetings at regular intervals. When the annual general meeting is held for the first time after the company’s incorporation, it has to be held within a period of nine months from the date of the closing of the financial year of the company, and in other cases, within six months from the date of the closing of the financial year. Further, as per Section 96 of the Companies Act, 2013, a company has no obligation to hold any general meetings until it holds its first annual general meeting. Such a relaxation is provided so that the company can set up its final reports for a longer duration. Another provision that is provided under Section 166(1) is that, with proper authorization from the registrar, the company can postpone the date of the annual general meeting. The registrar has the authority to postpone the date for a further three months at the most, however, such a relaxation does not apply in the case of the company’s first annual general meeting. Further, a company may not hold an annual general meeting in a year provided the registrar has consented to it, however, the justification for such an extension should be reasonable and genuine.
Gaps between two annual general meetings
According to Section 96 of the Companies Act, the gap between two annual general meetings must not exceed fifteen months. Further, Section 210 of the Act states that a company must provide a report on the accounts of all the profits and losses of the company, and if the company does not have any profits, an income and expenditure report must be submitted.
Furthermore, the following pointers are crucial to note in cases of gaps between two annual general meetings:
When a company presents its report on profits and losses incurred, it has to mention all the profits and losses endured by the company right from the day of incorporation.
The account shall have an update of at least 9 months from the date of the last annual general meeting.
A balance sheet along with the account report has to be submitted, as well.
Also, after conducting the first annual general meeting, the next AGM must be held within 6 months from the end of the financial year. If, due to any unforeseeable circumstance, the company fails to hold the meeting, the tribunal may grant an extension of 3 months.
Quorum
Public company
The quorum in the case of a public company shall consist of the following:
5 if the company has less than 1000 members,
15 if the members are between 1000 and 5000, and
30 if the number of members exceeds 5000.
Private company
In the case of a private company, only two members who are present will constitute the quorum.
Proxy in annual general meetings
Any member of the company who has the authority to vote at a meeting will be entitled to appoint a proxy, i.e., another person to attend and vote instead of himself. The appointment of a proxy shall be in Form No. MGT.11. Further, an individual cannot act as a proxy on behalf of members exceeding a total of 50 and holding in aggregate not more than 10% of total capital with the authority to vote.
Procedure to be followed after conducting the annual general meeting and penalty if the company fails
After conducting the annual general meeting, a report in the form of MGT-15 within a period of 30 days has to be filed. Further, under Section 121, the report will include how the meeting was convened, held, and conducted as per the provisions of the 2013 Act. If the company errs in doing so, a penalty of ₹1 lakh shall be imposed. Further, on every officer who has erred in following the procedure of the meeting, a penalty of ₹25,000 minimum shall be imposed, and in case the issue persists, a penalty of ₹500 for every day after the failure persists can be imposed, and the same shall be for a maximum of ₹1 lakh.
Penalty for not holding an annual general meeting
If a company errs in holding an annual general meeting in accordance with Section 99 of the Companies Act, 1956, the act shall be considered a serious offence in the eyes of the law. Every member of the company who is at fault shall be deemed to be a defaulter.
Further, a fine extendable to ₹100,000 may be levied on the defaulters. Moreover, as per Section 99 of the Companies Act, if the defaulters persist with the same mistakes, and if the provisions under Sections 96 and 97 are not complied with, a fine of ₹5000 will be imposed on the defaulter until the problem continues.
Power of NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal)
The National Company Law Tribunal, commonly known as NCLT, has the authority to call or direct a meeting under Section 97 of the Companies Act, 2013, in case an application is filed by a member in matters relating to the failure to conduct the meeting.
Extraordinary general meeting (EGM)
In a company, there are certain matters that are so crucial to be discussed that they need to be addressed immediately to the members, which is where an extraordinary general meeting comes into play. Such meetings are discussed under Section 100 of the Companies Act, 2013. An extraordinary general meeting is any general meeting apart from the statutory meeting, an annual general meeting, or any adjournment meeting. Such a meeting is held to discuss special business, especially those businesses that do not fall under the ordinary business that is discussed at annual general meetings. Such meetings are usually called for matters that are urgent and for those that cannot be discussed at annual general meetings. Extraordinary general meetings are usually called by the following:
The directors or the board of directors of the company,
The shareholders of the company who hold 1/10th of the paid-up shares.
Calling of extraordinary general meeting
While dealing with the above heading, one might wonder when and by whom an extraordinary general meeting can be called. Let’s find out.
An extraordinary general meeting can be called in the following circumstances:
By the board of directors suo moto
In cases when the board of directors has some urgent matters to discuss and such matters cannot be postponed until the next general meeting, the board of directors may hold an extraordinary general meeting if need be. The same is discussed under Section 100 (1) of the 2013 Act.
By the Board on the requisition of members
The board of directors may call an extraordinary general meeting on the requisition of the following number of members:
In case of a company having a share capital
Members who own 1/10th of the paid-up share capital of the company on the date of receipt of the requisition on the date of exercising the voting rights.
In case of a company not having a share capital
Members who own 1/10th of the paid-up share capital of the company on the date of receipt of the requisition on the date of exercising the voting rights.
By requisitionists
Under Section 100(4) of the Company Act, 2013, if a board does not, within 21 days from the date of receipt of a valid requisition in relation to any matters thereto, take any steps to call a meeting to consider the matter not later than forty-five days from the date of receiving such a requisition, then the meeting may be called upon and conducted by the requisitionists themselves within a time span of three months from the date of the requisition.
Further, it is important to note the following pointers for a better understanding of the topic:
Notice
The notice must specify the date, day, time, and place of holding the meeting, and must be held in the same city as the registered office and on a working day.
Notice to be signed
The notice has to be duly signed by all the requisitionists or on behalf of those requisitionists who have permission to sign in place of the requisitionists, provided the permission is in writing. This can also be done via an electronic request attached to a scanned copy to give such permission.
No need of an explanatory statement to be attached to the notice
There is no need for any explanatory statement under Section 102 to be attached with the notice of an extraordinary general meeting that is convened by the requisitionists and the requisitionists.
Serving notice of the meeting
The notice of the meeting has to be served on all those members whose names are on the list of registered members of the company. It should be served within three days of the requisitionists depositing a valid request for conducting an EGM in the company.
Method of serving the notice
The notice of the meeting can be sent through speed mail, registered mail, or even electronic means like emails. If there is an issue with serving the notice or if some member does not receive the notice for any reason, the meeting shall not be invalidated by any member.
By the tribunal
According to Section 98 of the Companies Act, 2013, if it is not possible to conduct a meeting in the company, the tribunal may either suo moto or through an application submitted by any director or member of the company who has the authority to vote at the meeting-
Instruct to hold and conduct a meeting in a manner the tribunal thinks fit, and
Provide ancillary or consequential instructions as the tribunal deems fit, including any directives thus amending or supplementing in matters relating to the calling, holding and conducting the meeting, the operation of the clauses of the Act or articles of the company.
Such instructions may also incorporate any command that a member of the company present in person or via proxy shall be deemed to compose a meeting. The meeting held pursuant to such orders shall be referred to as a meeting of the company that is duly called, held, and conducted.
Place of conducting an extraordinary general meeting
An extraordinary general meeting can be held at the registered office or any other location in the city where such a registered office is located.
Notice for extraordinary general meeting
The notice of an extraordinary general meeting must be served in writing or through an electronic mode in at least 21 days of conducting such a meeting.
Penalty for not holding an extraordinary general meeting properly
In cases where an extraordinary general meeting is not conducted properly, a fine of ₹10,000 within a prescribed time can be levied on the defaulters. Moreover, in case the issue persists, a fine of ₹1000 per day shall be levied. Additionally, the maximum fines in cases of erring in conducting an EGM successfully are:
₹50,000 for a member of the company, and
₹200,000 for the company itself.
Class meeting
Company meetings come under two broad categories, namely:
General meetings, and
Class meetings.
We have already talked about the different types of general meetings above, let’s now discuss what these class meetings are!
Class meetings, as the name suggests, are meetings conducted for shareholders of the company that hold a particular class of shares. Such a meeting is conducted to pass a resolution that is binding only on members of the concerned class. Also, only members belonging to that particular class of shares have the right to attend and vote at the meeting. Usually, the voting rules are applicable to class meetings as they govern voting at general meetings.
Such class meetings can be conducted whenever there is a need to alter or change the rights or privileges of that class as stated in the articles of association. In order to execute such changes, it is crucial that these amendments be approved in a separate meeting of the shareholders and supported by passing a special resolution. Under Section 48 of the Companies Act, 2013, which talks about variations in shareholders’ rights, class meetings of the holders of the different classes of shares must be conducted in case there are any variations. Similarly, under Section 232, which discusses mergers and amalgamations of companies, where a scheme of arrangement is proposed, there is a requirement that meetings of several classes of shareholders and creditors be conducted.
Meetings of directors
Board of directors
Board meetings
As per Section 173 of the Companies Act, 2013, a company has to hold the meeting of board of directors in the following manner:
The first board meeting has to be conducted within a span of thirty days from the date of incorporation.
In addition to the above meeting, every company has to hold a minimum of four board meetings annually, and there shall not be a gap of more than one hundred and twenty days between consecutive two meetings.
Please note: With the issuance of Secretarial Standard 1 (SS-1), a circular by ICSI, a clarification was given that the board shall conduct a meeting at least once every six months with a maximum gap of one hundred and twenty days between two consecutive board meetings. Further, the SS also specified that it will be sufficient if a company holds one meeting in every renaming calendar quarter in the year of its incorporation in addition to the first meeting, which is to be held within thirty days from the date of incorporation.
In matters relating to Section 8 of the Companies Act, with an exemption by MCA dated 5.06.2015, it was held that the sub clause (1) of Section 173 will be applicable only to the extent that the board of directors of such companies hold at least one meeting in every six months.
Purpose of holding a board meeting
Board meetings are held for the following purposes:
For issuing shares and debentures.
For making calls on shares.
For forfeiting the shares.
For transferring the shares.
For fixing the rate of dividend.
For taking loans in addition to debentures.
For making an investment in the wealth of the company.
For pondering over the difficulties of the company.
For making decisions of the policies of the company.
Notice of board meetings
As per Section 173(3) of the Companies Act, 2013-
A notice of not less than seven days must be sent to every director at the address that is registered with the company.
Such notice can be sent either via speed post, by hand delivery, or through any electronic means.
The SS-1 (mentioned above) states that if the company sends the notice by speed post, or registered post, or by courier, an additional two days shall be added to the notice served period.
In situations when the board meeting is called at shorter notice, it has to be conducted in the presence of at least one independent director.
Further, if the independent director is absent, the decision occurred at must be circulated to all the directors, and it shall be final only after ratification of decision by at least one independent director.
Moreover, in cases where a company does not have its own independent director, the decision shall be said to be final only if it is ratified by a majority of directors, unless a majority of directors gave their approval at the meeting itself.
Some important pointers on the requirements and procedures for convening and conducting a valid board meeting
Directors can join the meeting-
In person,
Through video conferencing, or
Other audio visual means.
Rule 3 of the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014, has provisions related to the requirements and procedures, along with the procedures needed for board meetings in person for matters relating to conveying and conducting board meetings via video conferencing.
While conducting virtual meetings, it is necessary that companies make proper arrangements to avoid any issues at the last moment.
The chairperson and the secretary of the company have to ensure that they take necessary precautions in matters relating to video conferencing, like proper security, recording the proceedings and preparing the minutes of the meeting, having proper audio visual equipment, etc.
The notice for holding the meeting must be in accordance with the provisions laid under Section 173, subsection 3 of the Act.
While beginning the meeting, the chairperson has the duty to roll call every director participating through video conferencing or other such means to record the following:
Name of the director;
The place from where the director is participating;
An affirmation that the director can completely see, listen, and communicate with the other participants in the meeting;
A confirmation that the director has received the agenda and all the relevant material related to the meeting;
A proclamation that no other individual other than the director is attending or has access to the proceedings of the meeting at the palace mentioned in pointer (b).
After the roll call, the chairperson or the secretary has to inform the board about the names of the members who are attending the meeting at the request or with the authorization of the chairman and affirm that the required quorum is complete.
There are some matters that must not be dealt with through video conferencing or other audiovisual means, namely:
An approval of the annual financial statements;
An approval of the report of the board;
An approval of the prospectus;
The audit committee meetings for consideration of statements related to finance, including a consolidated financial statement, if any, that needs an approval from the board under subsection (1) of Section 134 of the Act; and
An approval on matters related to the amalgamation, merger, demerger, acquisition, and takeover.
Agenda
The word “agenda” can be described as things to be done. In the case of company meetings, it can be said to be a statement of the business that must be transacted at a meeting, along with the order in which the business must be dealt with. Even though there is no explicit mention or provision in the Companies Act, 2013, for the secretary to send an agenda or include the same in the notice of the board meeting, it is necessary by convention for the agenda to be mentioned with the notice served to conduct the meeting. When an agenda is attached to the notice, the director is aware of the proposed business and the objects of conducting the meeting, thus, he can come duly prepared for the discussion to be held in the meeting.
Quorum
As we know, every company needs to have a proper quorum to conduct a valid company meeting. Now, the quorum for a board meeting under Section 174 of the Act is one third of the total strength or two directors, whichever is higher. It must be noted that, any director participating through video conferencing or any other audiovisual means must also be considered to determine the quorum.
Further, if the number of directors is reduced or there is any removal of a director or directors, the directors who continue may act on behalf of the missing number of directors to fill the missing gap for the quorum or for summoning a general meeting of the company; however, they shall not act for any other purpose. Moreover, in cases where the number of directors interested surpasses or is equal to two-thirds of the total strength of the board of directors, the number of directors who are not interested and are there to attend the meeting, the number not being below two, shall be the quorum at such times.
It is pertinent to note that the quorum has to be present not only at the time of commencement of the meeting but also at the time of transacting business with the company.
Committee of directors
The board of directors has the authority to form committees and delegate powers to such committees; however, it is crucial that such a committee only consist of directors and no other members. Further, it is mandatory for such committees to be authorised by the articles of association of the company and be in lieu of the provisions set out in the Companies Act. The meetings of all these committees are held in the same manner as board meetings.
In large companies, the following routine matters are looked after by the sub-committees of the board of directors:
Allotment,
Transfer,
Finance.
Other meetings
Debenture holders meeting
A company is entitled to issue debentures, and to further implement the same, a meeting for debenture holders can be called. This meeting is between the board of directors and the debenture holders. These meetings are usually called to discuss the rights and responsibilities of debenture holders.
Meetings of debenture holders are conducted in accordance with the provisions laid down in the debenture trust deed. The rules and regulations mentioned in the trust deed are related to the following:
Notice of the meeting,
Appointment of a chairman of the meeting,
Passing resolutions,
Quorum of the meeting, and
Writing and signing of minutes of the meeting.
Debenture holder meetings are generally conducted from time to time to discuss matters where the interest of debenture holders is involved, like at the time of:
Reconstruction,
Reorganisation,
Amalgamation, or
Winding up of the company.
Creditors meeting
Meetings of creditors is a term used to describe a meeting setup by the company to conduct a meeting of the company’s creditors. Under the Company Act, 2013, companies are not only entrusted with the power to negotiate with creditors but also set up a procedure to do so. Such meetings are always arranged in matters where a creditor decides to voluntarily wind up.
Moreover, Section 108 of the Companies Act, 2013, discusses the holding of meetings of creditors. It also states that meetings be held in accordance with the provisions laid down under the following sections of the said Act:
Section 111 that has provisions in relation to the circulation of members’ resolutions.
In the creditors meeting, the creditors can decide to either approve, amend, or reject the repayment plan. Further, the resolution professional must make sure that any sort of changes or modifications suggested by the creditors of the company are approved by the directors of the company before carrying out that particular change. Furthermore, the resolution professional also has the authority to adjourn the meeting of the creditors for a period of not more than seven days at a time.
Notice of meetings of creditors
If a company is voluntarily winding up, a meeting of creditors must be called to propose a resolution for voluntary winding up. Such a meeting has to be called either on the day of taking such a decision or the subsequent day, and a general meeting must be conducted to propose the resolution.
The notice to creditors must either be sent by post along with the notices regarding the general meeting of the company for winding up. Additionally, with the notice to the creditors, the company also has to advertise at least once in the official gazette and once in two newspapers that are circulated in the district where the company’s registered office or principal place of business is situated.
Procedure for conducting a company meeting
While discussing the procedure for consulting the meeting of the creditors, the following pointers are noteworthy:
Obligation of the board of directors
While conducting a meeting, the board of directors must submit a statement on the position of the company’s affairs along with a list of the company’s creditors and the estimated amount of their claims. The director who is entrusted with the duty to conduct the meeting of creditors or who is in charge of the same must attend the meeting and hold it at the same time.
Next course of winding up of the company
Based on the decision that occurred at the meeting of creditors, the company shall decide its next course of action. The decision could be one of the following:
The company would wind up on a voluntary basis if all the parties agree to it unanimously.
In case the company is not able to repay all the debts from the assets sold in the voluntary winding up of the company, then a resolution can be passed from winding up the company by involving the tribunal.
Passing the notice of resolution
When a notice of resolution is passed in the meeting of creditors, the same must be filed with the registrar within 10 days of passing such a resolution. If the company does not adhere to the set provisions of company law under the Companies Act, 2013, a penalty with a fine that will not be less than fifty thousand rupees and extendable up to two lakh rupees shall be imposed. Further, the director of the company who errs in following the procedure, will also be penalised with an imprisonment for a term extendable to six months or with a fine not less than fifty thousand rupees and extendable up to two lakh rupees.
Quorum of creditors
A meeting cannot be commenced unless the creditors of the company, known as quorum attend the meeting. The requisite quorum is as follows:
Quorum in case of creditors
In the case of creditors, at least one creditor entitled to vote must be in the quorum.
Creditors and contributors meeting
Creditor and contributor meetings are usually conducted when the company has gone into liquidation to calculate the total amount due by the company to its creditors. The main motive of holding such meetings is to seek the approval of the contributors to the scheme of compromise or rearrangement to save the company from economic difficulties.
At times, even a court can pass an order to conduct such a meeting. It should be noted that the term “contributory” encompasses every individual who is accountable for making contributions to the assets of the company at the time of winding up.
Quorum in case of contributors
In the case of a meeting of contributors, at least one creditor is entitled to vote, or all the contributors if their number does not exceed two.
Requisites of a valid company meeting
If the business carried on in a company is valid and legally binding, it is necessary that the meeting called to conduct such business also be held in a valid manner. To understand the same, there are some pointers one must understand to consider a meeting valid. The following are the requisites for conducting a valid company meeting:
The meeting is convened by proper authority.
The announcement of holding the meeting is served through a proper notice. The same has been discussed under Section 101 and 102 of the Companies Act, 2013.
While holding the meeting, it is crucial that a proper quorum is present.
To conduct the meeting, it is important that it must be presided over by a proper chairman.
At the meeting, business must be validly transacted.
It is crucial that proper minutes of the meeting must be prepared.
Relevance of different company meetings
Every company has its own importance. Let’s quickly take a look at each of the company law meetings’ relevance.
Annual general meeting (AGM)
An AGM is conducted to transact the ordinary business of the company. Ordinary business includes the following:
Consideration of financial statements and reports from the directors and auditors.
Making declarations on dividends.
Appointing a replacement of directors in place of those who have retired.
Appointing and setting up the amount of remuneration for auditors of the company.
It also includes annual accounts, crucial reports, audits.
Extraordinary general meeting (EGM)
An EGM is conducted to discuss special businesses, usually those that do not fall under the category of ordinary businesses, which are discussed at AGMs. These meetings are generally called only in cases of urgent matters or for those matters that are not discussed at AGMs.
Class meetings
Class meetings are conducted for shareholders belonging to a particular class. These meetings are held to gain approval via a special resolution of all such members belonging to the particular class to seek their approval on important matters or amends in any field related to their interests.
Board of directors meeting
A board of directors is held for several purposes, namely, for making calls on shares, issuing shares and debentures, forfeiting the shares, for discussing the difficulties of the company, etc.
Committee of directors meeting
A committee of directors meeting can be held for issues relating to the allotment or transfer of any share or asset of the company, or even for any issues relating to the finances of the company.
Debenture holders meeting
Debenture holders meetings are conducted to decide upon matters relating to the reconstruction, reorganisation, amalgamation, or winding up of the company.
Creditors meeting
Creditors meetings are usually conducted for the creditors to either approve, change, or deny the repayment plans of a company when it decides to wind up voluntarily.
Creditors and contributors meeting
Similar to the aforementioned meeting, a contributors meeting is conducted for the calculation of the total amount due by the company to repay creditors or contributors when the company has gone into liquidation.
What happens if there is a breach in conducting company law meetings
As discussed under each heading (wherever relevant), in case a company errs in conducting a meeting, a penalty in the form of fine, is imposed by the tribunal. The penalty is either imposed on the company or its members, or both. The penalty keeps recurring up to a certain amount in case of continuation of the blunder.
Judicial pronouncements on company meetings and relevant provisions
There are several cases where the matters relating to company law meetings were approached in the court of law. Below is an amalgamation of a few of them. A point must be noted that an attempt is made to segregate each case law on the basis of the type of company meeting or relevant provisions. Each judicial pronouncement has been added under separate subheadings then.
Annual general meeting (AGM)
T.V. Mathew v. Nadukkara Agro Processing Co. Ltd. (2002)
In this case, the Kerala High Court opined that there is no provision in the law which states that holding the first AGM of the company can go beyond the set time period, i.e., nine months from the forest financial year of the company.
Sikkim Bank Ltd. v. R. S. Chowdhury (2000)
In this case, the Calcutta High Court held that any meeting or business conducted at a location other than the one mentioned in the notice of the meeting will be declared to be prima facie void. If such an issue arises, a notice declaring the change of location has to be served to each and every member having the authority to attend the meeting.
M/S. Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Shyam Sundar Jhunjhunwala (1961)
In the case of M/S. Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Shyam Sundar Jhunjhunwala (1961), the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that if a managing director of a company had repeatedly called upon other directors of the company to hold an AGM, but the efforts are in vain, the managing director could not be considered to be an “officer in default”.
Re. Brahmanbaria Loan Co. Ltd. (1934)
In Re. Brahmanbaria Loan Co. Ltd. (1934), the Calcutta High Court held that it is no defence for a company to plead that it was not able to conduct an annual general meeting just because a criminal case was filed against the secretary of the company and important books of the company had been exhibited in the court for carrying out the proceedings.
Kastoor Mal Banthiya v. State (1951)
In this case, the Court had a lenient view when a company that had only two members who were brothers, had to approach the Court for justice. Here, one of the brothers was seriously ill, and hence the company erred in conducting the meeting. The Court stated that the non-performance of holding the AGM was not a deliberate, willful defect, and hence no charges were filed against them.
Extraordinary general meeting (EGM)
Life Insurance Corporation v. Escorts Ltd. & Ors. (1986)
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Life Insurance Corporation v. Escorts Ltd. & Ors. (1985)stated that every individual holding shares of a company has the right to call/requisition an extraordinary general meeting subject to the provisions of the Act. Further, the Court said that once the requisition is made in compliance with the provisions of the Act, the shareholder cannot be restricted from calling any such meeting. Simply put, the Apex Court stated that an institutional shareholder like that of LIC, too, has the same right to requisition an EGM as any other shareholder.
Moreover, the Supreme Court in this case made another interesting observation. It said, if an EGM is filed for the purpose of removing some of the existing directors of the company, one cannot say that the requisition is invalid just because the reason for their removal was not mentioned.
Ball v. Metal Industries Ltd. (1957)
In Ball v. Metal Industries Ltd. (1957), the Court of Session in Scotland said that the requisition to hold an EGM must set out the matters for calling such a meeting, that is, apart from the agenda for the meeting, no other discussion can be carried out in these meetings. For instance, if an EGM is being conducted for the appointment of three new directors, the chairman cannot add a new item for the removal of one of the existing directors of the company to the agenda.
B. Sivaraman v. Egmore Benefit Society Ltd. (1992)
In the case of B. Sivaraman v. Egmore Benefit Society Ltd. (1992), the Madras High Court held that an extra annual general meeting cannot be requisitioned for a declaration that the directors appointed at the last meetings were not justifiably elected and that the requisitionists should be appointed on their behalf.
Anantha R. Hedge v. Capt. T.S. Gopala Krishna (1996)
In the case of Anantha R. Hedge v. Capt. T.S. Gopala Krishna (1996), the Karnataka High Court opined that just because a director refused to conduct an extraordinary general meeting when requisitioned, it would not amount to an offence under the 2013 Act.
B. Mohandas v. A. K. M. N. Cylinders Pvt. Ltd. (1998)
In the case of B. Mohandas v. A. K. M. N. Cylinders Pvt. Ltd. (1998), the Company Law Board opined that the requisitionists cannot approach the tribunal directly, i.e., when the requisitionists have not made an attempt to call the meeting themselves as stated under the law, they cannot approach the tribunal for an order directing the EGM.
Amit Kaur Puri v. Kapurthala Flour, Oil and General Mills C. PVt. Ltd. (1982)
In this case, the High Court of Punjab-Haryana held that when a company has no duly constituted board of directors, it is not feasible to hold a meeting.
Indian Spinning Mills Ltd. v. His Excellency (1953)
In the case of Indian Spinning Mills Ltd. v. His Excellency (1953), an individual who did not possess a qualifying share was assigned to be the chairman of the company. Later, some directors transferred their shares to him to fulfil the requisite necessities of the articles of the company. However, a group of members objected to this action and filed a suit, claiming such an action to be invalid. Here, the Calcutta High Court held that when such a situation arises, it is quite impractical to conduct a meeting.
Re. Ruttonjee and Company Ltd. v. Unknown (1968)
In the case of Re. Ruttonjee and Company Ltd. v. Unknown (1968), the Calcutta High Court cautioned the Tribunal, stating that it should interfere only if it is fully convinced that the application made is filed with bona fide intentions in the larger interest of the company.
The High Court issued a note of caution against the misuse of application under the Act and stated that, “the power should be used sparingly and with caution so that the court does not become either a share-holder or a director of the company trying to participate in the internecine squabbles of the company.”
Board meeting
Sanjiv Kothari v. Vasant Kumar Chordia (2004)
In the case of Sanjiv Kothari v. Vasant Kumar Chordia (2004), an observation was made that in case a meeting is convened by the managing director on requisition by the director on the same date to have a discussion on the same matter that was highlighted by the director, the director has to attend the meeting and should not have any other arrangement for attending a meeting on the same date at some other place.
Dankha Devi Agarwal v. Tara Properties Private Limited
In Dankha Devi Agarwal v. Tara Properties Private Limited (2006), the Hon’ble Supreme Court concluded that if a decision is reached without due notice of such a meeting for the removal or induction of any individual, such an act would constitute oppression and mismanagement. It further stated that at least two directors or one-third of the total strength, whichever is higher, will constitute a quorum for a board meeting. Also, directors who are attending the meeting in person or through any audio-visual means would be counted for the purposes of quorum.
Notice of the meeting
Smith v. Darley (1848)
In this case, the Queen’s Bench Division of Ireland held that an accidental omission to give notice to, or the non-receipt of, such notice by any individual who is entitled to receive it does not invalidate the proceedings of the meeting; however, if such a notice is deliberately commissioned to be served, it will definitely result in invalidation.
Kaye v. Croydon Tramways Co. (1898)
In this case, there was a provisional agreement for the sale of an undertaking by one company to that of the other. So, the company sent out a notice stating that the object of the meeting was to adopt an agreement for the sale of one of the company’s undertakings to another; however, it failed to reveal the fact that substantial amounts were payable to the directors of the undertaking that was to be sold to compensate for the loss of office. Here, the court held that the notice was invalid as it was not adequate and did not disclose all the facts upon which the members would be exercising their right to vote.
Parker and Cooper Ltd v. Reading (1926)
In this famous English case, the court observed that when the members had been served a notice that was not in accordance with the set standards but were still present at the meeting, the notice could be made good. Further, the meeting can also be considered valid irrespective of whether the notice served in the first place was apt or not.
PNC Telecom v. Thomas (2002)
In this case, the Vice-Chancellor of the Chancery Division of England and Wales held that a notice of a meeting served via fax is a valid notice.
Quorum of the meeting
Sharp v. Dawes (1876)
In the case of Sharp v. Dawes (1876), a company with several members called a meeting for the purpose of making a call on the members. However, only one member, who was holding a proxy, was present at the venue of the meeting. He proceeded to take the chair and pass the necessary resolution for making the aforementioned call on the members. Furthermore, he even proposed a vote of thanks. When this issue arrived in court, the Court declared such a meeting to be invalid. In the words of Lord Coleridge, “the word ‘meeting’ prima facie means a coming together of two or more than two persons“.
Chairman
Pena v. Dale (2003)
In this case, it was stated that if an individual is informally invited to act as a chairman of a meeting but no formal resolution is passed in this regard, the members of the company attending the meeting have the right to raise an objection contending that there was no valid appointment of a chairman.
Voting
T. H. Vakil v. Bombay Presidency Radio Club (1945)
In a company, business transactions are carried out at meetings in the form of resolutions. Members are entitled to discuss the contents of a resolution before it is considered to be put up for voting. Further, amendments that are pertinent to the proposed resolution may be proposed in the meeting and voted upon. In case the amendment is passed, the amended resolution will be considered for voting. In this case, the Bombay High Court held that if the chairman wrongfully rules out an amendment to a resolution, the next proceedings conducted to discuss the same resolution will be deemed as invalid.
Conclusion
Under the Companies Act, 2013, it is important that companies conduct requisite meetings throughout the year as and when necessary. These meetings play a major role in shaping the company, as major decisions relating to the company and its future are taken in such meetings.
There are three main categories of meetings in company law, and each meeting has its own significance. Also, these meetings are further divided into subcategories. For a recap, let us again take a look at the categories.
Meetings of shareholders or members
General meeting which is further divided into:
Statutory meeting,
Annual General Meeting,
Extraordinary General Meeting.
Class meeting.
Meetings of Directors
Board of directors meeting,
Committee of directors meeting.
Other meetings
Debenture holders meeting,
Creditors meeting, and
Creditors and contributors meeting.
Further, for every meeting to be valid, it is integral that it must be duly convened, properly constituted and effectively conducted under the requisite provisions of the Companies Act and the rules framed thereunder.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Can an AGM be held by the company at a place other than its registered address under company law? Can it be held outside India?
An annual general meeting can be held at any place that is within the jurisdiction of the city, town or village in which the registered office is situated. Further, a government company also has the authority to hold an AGM at any place approved by the Central Government.
To answer the second question, yes, a company can hold an AGM outside India, however, a prior permission from the Central Government is required to carry out such an activity.
Which companies are not obliged to hold an AGM?
All companies except one person company, commonly known as OPC, are obliged to hold an AGM at the end of each financial year. Further, a company has the duty to hold an AGM within a period of six months from the end of the financial year.
What are the five P’s in conducting a valid meeting?
The five P’s for holding a meeting effectively are:
Book on Company Law by S.P. Law classes, Pune Pg. no. 99 to 107
Book on Company Law by Prof. H.D. Pithawalla, 7th edition
Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join: