Download Now
Home Blog Page 481

What is deemed approval and why has CCI given it to Synergy Metals : an overview

0

This article has been written by Manan Sabharwal pursuing the Diploma in M&A, Institutional Finance and Investment Laws (PE and VC transactions) from LawSikho. This article has been edited by Amitabh Ranjan (Associate, Lawsikho) and Dipshi Swara (Senior Associate, Lawsikho). 

Introduction

The Competition Commission of India is an expert body with the official jurisdiction for Merger control and Antitrust activities which is governed by the principal legislation of the Competition Act, 2002 and subsequent rules and notifications under it. Its main objective is to make sure that the balance in a business environment is maintained and no corporate entity has an undue advantage which it carries out by engaging in detailed investigations. The Competition Commission in an endeavour to better facilitate mergers and acquisitions established an initiative called ‘Green Channel clearance’ on 19th August, 2019 as per the press release dated.  

Mergers or Amalgamations when discussed in reference to the Competition Act are referred to as ‘Combinations’.  Therefore, every combination over and above a certain threshold as per the act has to pass through the scanner vision of the CCI. The commission characterises the ‘Green Channel’ as an automatic system of approval for combinations wherein the combination is deemed to be approved upon filing the notice in format prescribed. 

The Competition Commission of India celebrated its anniversary for Green Channel as per its Twitter post and gave statistics of Total Notices and Green Channel approvals, one of which was given to a deal between Synergy Metals Investment Holding Limited (acquirer) and JSW Cement (target). This article is a detailed analysis of the deemed approval given to the deal and provisions of Green Channel. 

Background of Synergy Metals and JSW Steel

As per the official website of Synergy, it states that it is a Private Equity fund and Strategic Advisory firm present in Dubai, London, Mumbai and Singapore and focuses on Industrials, Metals and Power sectors globally and targets special situations globally where it can drive through active management and operational transformation. Synergy focuses on structured investments with a typical investment bracket of USD 20 million dollars to 50 million dollars with a global mandate of geographically diversified portfolios across developed E.U and emerging Indian and South Asian markets. Synergy Fund states that it has 670 million U.S dollars capital deployed.  Synergy Metals Investment Holding Limited incorporated on 10th April, 2019 is the investment firm of Synergy Metals and Mining Fund I LP, Dubai. 

JSW Cement, founded in 2009, is an unlisted company part of the 13 billion dollars JSW Group. JSW Cement headquartered in Mumbai with Sajjan Jindal and Parth Jindal in key-managerial positions is India’s leading Green Cement company with a current capacity of claimed 14 million tonnes per annum (MTPA). The company primarily produces and trades in Cement, Clinker and Construction Material and is claimed to be converting industrial waste into cement and other building materials. JSW cement has many famous awards and accolades under its belt such as: Iconic Brands of India 2021, Best Infrastructure Brands, 2021 and Apex India Environment Excellence Award 2018 among others. 

Intricate details of the transactions

As per Synergy Metals press release, it is Synergy’s largest investment to date and is fully aligned with their ESG and Economic impact values. The total structured equity investment of totalling up to INR 750 crores (100 million USD) in JSW Cement, one of India’s leading and fastest-growing sustainable building products company is being looked at by experts as a strategic move focused towards sustainable building and constructions initiatives. The main factor drawing Synergy to JSW was its unique focus on green building materials, an example of which is: JSWC’s ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) with approximately 90% lower carbon footprint than traditional Portland Cement. 

As per a 2020 report by Mckinsey Global Institute titled: India’s turning point, housing and infrastructure are critical areas for rapid economic development. This report also provides a list of actionable reforms and opportunities to create 90 million new jobs by 2030. Considering this it would be safe to assume that Synergy’s investment in JSW Cement which received a deemed approval by CCI under Green Channel paves path to a new future with others to follow suit in a sector which is already heavily regulated and not without its fair share of controversies especially with regard to CCI imposing heavy penalties on Cement Companies in the past

Meaning of Green Channel and its significance in relation to deemed approval

The Competition Law Review Committee which submitted its report on 26th July, 2019 was set up by the central government on 1st October 2018 to review the Competition Act and rules and regulations framed thereunder. One of the recommendations based on the report was adopted and implemented by the CCI by amending the Competition Commission of India (Procedure in regard to transaction of business relating to combinations) Regulations, 2011 [Amended Combination Regulations] by a gazette Notification dated: 13th August 2019 this initiative expressly termed the “Green Channel” was a first of its kind which provides for an automatic approval of certain combinations under the Competition Act by filing of Notice in Form-1 in regulation 5(2) with CCI. It is stated that upon filing of such a notice and its acknowledgement the proposed combination “shall be deemed to have been approved” by the commission under sub-section (1) of section 31 of the Act. 

Parties that are desirous of availing this deemed approval route are required to self-assess the transactions internally without any prior filing to ascertain if they qualify for Green Channel route or not. The key change Green Channel route brings for automatic approval is the elimination of statutory limit of 210 days prescribed for ex-ante examinations of combinations by CCI to ascertain if they may cause appreciable adverse effect on competition in their relevant markets before granting them an approval by CCI this automatic approval enables the parties to implement their transactions smoothly and rapidly without waiting for an approval by CCI. 

Such self-assessment and guidance as mentioned above is provided to the parties by referring to the newly amended Schedule-III of Amended Combination Regulations to check if such combination is eligible for Green Channel route. It is important to note that the Green Channel route while providing for an automatic approval and granting an opportunity to parties for self-assessment does create an embargo on certain approvals for combinations between transacting parties as they should not have any:

  • Horizontal Overlaps or in other words they should not be producing any similar, identical or substitutable products or services. 
  • Vertical Overlaps or they should not be engaged in activities at different stages or levels of the production chain. 
  • Complementary Overlaps which simply put, are products/services when combined and used together contribute to enhancing the value of combined goods/services. 

This embargo and overlaps are not limited to just the transacting parties to the combination and their group entities but also to any and every entity in which they hold shares/stake and/or exercise control through direct or indirect shareholding of 10% or more, it also includes the ability to exercise any right or ability unavailable to an ordinary shareholder and the right or capacity to nominate a director or observer in another enterprise. 

This Green Channel notification as mentioned above has to be filed in Form-I Along with a self-declaration as given under Schedule-IV. As per filing under Form-I the filing fee of INR 20,00,000 (Twenty Lakh only) shall be applicable as prescribed by Regulation 11 of the Combination Regulations,2011.  

Risks in availing the Green Channel route

The parties are required to conduct a self-assessment with regard to concerning overlaps and if at all the combination creates any adverse effect on the competition, it is pertinent to note that if there is any default in the declaration (as mentioned previously) or in case wrong information is furnished the CCI can hold the automatic approval granted to the combination to be void-ab-initio but with sufficient opportunity given to transacting parties for hearing before such revocation. 

Post such revocation the parties can also be held liable for penalties under Section 44 of the Act which gives discretion to the commission for determination and shall not be less than INR Fifty Lakhs but which can extend up to INR One Crore. Even further if parties consummate the transaction, they can be made liable for proceedings under Section 43A of the Act which states that if parties consummate a combination without prior approval of the commission, they shall be made liable for a penalty which can extend to one percent of such total turnover or the assets of such a combination, whichever is higher. 

In essence the parties to the combination stand at the risk of exposing their transaction/combination to be void ab-initio if defaults are made in the declaration and/or overlaps, supplementarily if the combination doesn’t satisfy CCI in furtherance penalties can be imposed under relevant sections.  

Conclusion

The Green Channel is an important and pioneering initiative by the CCI that aids and facilitates smooth and rapid approvals to Merger and Acquisition transactions by incorporating automatically deemed approval status, it simultaneously emerges as a glaring champion for pro-business development and an important step in the right direction to avoid any unnecessary regulatory delays especially at a time when the office of CCI is closed due to the global pandemic, but still the Green Channel route is open for approvals as per this press release. 

One of the combinations given that deemed approval under Green Channel by the CCI during the pandemic was the acquisition of equity stake by Synergy Metals (acquirer) in JSW Cement (target) on 14th July, 2021 as per the official press release by CCI. It is claimed that one out of five cases is opting green channel route for approval which is sufficiently aligned with central governments ease of doing business and encourages unwrinkled Mergers and Acquisitions by removing dispensable regulatory delays by shifting onus on the transacting parties and reducing the burden on the regulatory body. In all probability, more combinations will opt for the Green Channel route in future as Synergy and JSW Cement did. 


Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:https://t.me/joinchat/J_0YrBa4IBSHdpuTfQO_sA

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Innovation and the patent system : can the existing patent system still be an incentive for innovation

0
Patent laws

This article is written by Vivek Maurya from ICFAI Law University, Dehradun. This article describes the incentives for innovation in the current stringent patent system and how the system can be improved.

Introduction

A patent can cover innovation, which is a novel solution to technological difficulties. By guaranteeing that an inventor may direct the economic use of his creation, patent rules protect the rights of innovators whose inventions are truly remarkable and commercially successful.

A patent holder has the right to restrict others from producing, selling, retailing, or importing that technology. This opens up opportunities for inventors to sell, swap, or licence their patented inventions to those who wish to utilise them. The criteria that need to be met in order to obtain a patent are set out in National Intellectual Property policies and may vary from country to country. In general, obtaining a patent requires an inventor to demonstrate that their invention is novel, useful, and no longer obvious to someone working in the relevant sector. To do so, they must define how their technology works and what it is capable of.

Innovation and the patent system

One of the arguments for patents is that they encourage economic and technological development and encourage competition by creating a financial incentive for the invention in exchange for disclosure of the invention to the public. Despite the fact that the capacity of the patent system has been widely diagnosed within the context of dynamic innovation activities, a few critics have claimed that the current patent system hinders research and development (R&D) and technological progress.

Given the rapid pace of technological innovation as well as social and economic challenges, the function, value, and impact of the patent system must be constantly adjusted and implemented in order to strike an optimal balance between right holders, new market entrants, and the public to achieve great things. To encourage R&D in new technologies such as information and communication technologies and biotechnology, the patent system must be designed in such a way that it can adapt quickly and strategically to the difficulties posed by those new technologies. In addition, to support a broad and complex technological development, it is necessary to strengthen public R&D activities, including universities, and to promote better cooperation between the private and public sectors. It is important to establish policies that balance by offering both incentives to encourage R&D at the end of the value-added chain and ensuring a competitive environment for pioneers, downstream researchers and producers.

The transmission of technical knowledge is one of the primary objectives of the patent system. Patent information is a valuable and comprehensive source of technical, commercial, and legal information that can be used directly for scientific and experimental purposes, as well as a foundation for encouraging the adaptation and improvement of described technologies immediately following their publication in patent documents. Recognizing the significance of distributing technical knowledge, an increasing number of IP offices and organisations are providing access to their patent document library through the Internet.

How does a patent policy relate to incentives for innovation?

The following market failures plague the process of creating new ideas, information, and inventions:

  1. The production of inventions has the nature of a public good because of which markets cannot provide the right incentives for its production.
  2. Building knowledge and eventually bringing it to market can require both fixed and variable investment costs. For example, the large amount of R&D investment made by a drug company for an anti-cancer drug or the substantial amount of intelligence, time and money invested by a musician is a new and unique creation. To cover these costs, in most cases, the holder of the IPR is required to charge a higher price, since the marginal cost of providing one additional unit of the good, additional medicine or an additional copy of the music is higher than the average cost is quite low.
  3. The market’s failure is caused by the unpredictability of freshly produced intellectual property inherent in the good. It is the consumer’s business uncertainty about embracing innovative items on the market. The inventor is faced with this uncertainty, as well as pre-existing technical risk, in addition to how effectively the invention is supposed to work.

Since markets cannot always offer the proper incentives for innovators, governments provide patent rights to inventors. These legally protected rights provide the owner with the right to exclude any of those who may economically benefit from patent policies without the owner’s prior agreement for a certain period. This means that the owner has the legal authority to prevent others from commercially exploiting the underlying IP assets. As a result, patent rights assist inventors of all types of intangible knowledge and assets in gaining and maintaining a competitive advantage in the market by addressing the issue of appropriation of their return on investment. However, it is worth noting that they do not address the challenge of uncertainty, as payment for patent titles is a function of consumer’s hold on markets rather than a fixed upfront return.

Patents, as well as other forms of Intellectual Property Rights such as trademarks, utility models, design rights, and copyrights, provide such incentives. These additional intellectual property classifications may also be especially significant to supporting incremental improvements as well as innovations outside of manufacturing. Furthermore, creative ideas frequently necessitate technical advancement before they can be commercialised. Small businesses and individual entrepreneurs may lack the required technical competence and marketing platforms. Patent protection on an invention can enable the innovator to secure R&D funds from venture capitalists and build relationships with partners such as other large firms, research institutes, and universities. The owner of patent rights might have a strong bargaining position in creating partnerships such as joint ventures, strategic alliances, licencing agreements, mergers, or acquisitions to bring inventions to market. These collaborations, which are based on royalty sharing, licencing, and secrecy agreements, might be crucial for companies to effectively market their technologies. These factors indicate extra incentives that an inventor should consider before seeking IP protection.

However, for patents to generate incentives, there must be several conditions, most notably an organization of patent policies that confer legal quality. Drawbacks, such as difficulties in enforcing patent rights or the high cost to do so, would effectively make the patent system less attractive to firms and thus not an incentive. Uncertainty or protracted delays in registration processes can likewise discourage the use of the patent system.

Criteria for determining the patent system

These criteria, although the judgment is required, can be assessed empirically to varying degrees and tracked over time to observe significant changes. In most cases they relate to factors that are widely regarded as important:

First criterion

The patent system must accommodate new technologies. A system that grants developers of one technology temporary monopoly rights while providing no incentive to inventors of other technologies, including competing technologies, would be hostile to innovation in the long run.

Second criterion

Only those innovations that pass the statutory standards of originality and utility should be rewarded, which at the time were not obvious to those skilled in the respective technologies, and which appear adequate. In the most extreme scenario, where innovation is already known to the public or where the patent’s entire scope cannot be used in practice, there is nothing to be gained and much from potentially granting a monopoly, something has to be lost.

Third criterion

The patent system should fulfill its second function of dissemination of technical information. This implies that the description of patented innovations should be as full, clear, and accessible as feasible, and should be revealed in a reasonable period, without precluding the use of the patent or other technical literature.

Fourth criterion

The administrative and judicial decisions involved in the patent system must be timely, and the costs associated with them must be reasonable and proportionate. The protracted uncertainty about whether a patent is issued on an application or a patent challenged in an infringement dispute will be upheld or not infringed is not conducive to the investment required for innovation. In the same way, the high transaction costs of getting or defending a patent are likely to deter innovation. Such costs prolong the resolution of the issue, whether patent qualification or infringement, is delayed.

Fifth criterion

The availability of licences on reasonable terms is critical in scientific research and the development of complex or cumulative technologies, where an advance is based on one or more previous discoveries or inventions and full exploitation of the technology is beyond the capability of a single entity, the patented inventions are reasonably broad. Accessibility is important. Access depends on at least three factors: 

  1. The scope of patent claims,
  2. The availability of licenses on reasonable terms, and
  3. The complexity of the patent landscape. Of course, the technology must first be built in for this to become an issue. Thus, access must be balanced against incentives to invent and disseminate technology.

Sixth criterion

The compatibility of the national patent system can promote trade and investment, and hence innovation, in an economy where a major percentage of its technology-intensive products is bought and sold abroad. There is a strong case to be made for integrating the patent systems of the United States, Europe, and Japan in order to minimise public and private transaction costs.

Seventh criterion

There should be a level playing field with intellectual property rights holders who are equally situated enjoying the same benefits while subject to the same obligations.

Evaluating patent system

The dangers of very weak patents

  1. Weak patent protection can lead to suboptimal innovation, since a private actor’s potential reward may be deemed insufficient for the time and resources invested in creating an invention.
  2. Because weaker rights make it more expensive to protect inventories, firms look inward to solve problems that might otherwise be solved more efficiently by an inter-firm partnership.
  3. Patents allow companies to examine the precise outcomes of future and present workers’ inventiveness and talents. Workers have a hard time determining their worth when their rights are limited.

The dangers of a patent that is too strong

  1. Extensive patent rights continually make innovative activities more expensive. Taking permission from all relevant patent holders increases the cost of innovation.
  2. Large corporations profit disproportionately from extremely strong patent rights. Unlike small and medium-sized businesses, which are more likely to utilise patents to increase income and improve their reputation, bigger businesses are more likely to use patents to improve their market position.
  3. When patent rights are strong, firms with intellectual property are encouraged to threaten other inventors with litigation.

Seeking a Goldilocks Approach

Incentives for innovation are reduced when intellectual property rights are either strong or too weak. Consider the Goldilocks Approach to strike the right balance:

  1. It is important to encourage follow-up innovation that can dramatically add value to pioneering inventions. However, the current system benefits those who do not research existing patents in this area for fear of litigation. The patent policy should protect inventors who seek to bypass existing patents should be protected, but those who willfully disregard earlier patents should be punished.
  2. Patents that are too broad or too vague are a barrier to progress, especially when it comes to software patents. The abundance of patents raises the risk of firms inadvertently infringing and hence raises the risk of patent litigation.
  3. Many patents held by companies and inventors are not exercised but are owned in case of potential infringement. This practice is useless and prevents patents from being put to their most efficient use. Dramatically raising the maintenance fee would ensure that the remaining, still maintained patents deserve the protection they are granted.

How can the existing stringent patent system be improved?

The following are the ways to ensure the vitality and to improve the functioning of the patent system:

  1. Keeping the patent system open-ended, unitary, and adaptable

The system must remain open to new technologies, and the characteristics allowing somewhat different treatment of different technologies must be preserved without formalizing different standards.

  1. Reviving the non-obvious standard

The requirement to qualify for a patent may not explain an invention to a person with normal skill in the art.

  1. Reducing discrepancies and inefficiencies in national patent systems

The US, Europe, and Japan should continue to unify patent examination methods and standards in order to eliminate redundancy in patent searches and examinations and eventually achieve mutual recognition of outcomes.

Conclusion

The high pace of innovation implies that the patent system is operating well and does not require major adjustments, but it is apparent that economic and legal developments are putting new strains on the system. Patents are being more actively sought and strictly enforced. The costs of obtaining a patent, promoting or securing the license of patented technology, and defending against allegations of infringement in court are increasing rapidly. Given these pressures, it’s a good moment to assess the system’s performance and explore how it might continue to rewire itself.

References

  1. https://www.wipo.int/ip-outreach/en/ipday/2017/innovation_and_intellectual_property.html
  2. https://www.kauffman.org/resources/entrepreneurship-policy-digest/how-intellectual-property-can-help-or-hinder-innovation/
  3. http://www.innovationpolicyplatform.org/www.innovationpolicyplatform.org/content/incentives-inventions/index.html

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/joinchat/J_0YrBa4IBSHdpuTfQO_sA

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Amendment of Section 366 of the Companies Act, 2013 : corporatisation prospects for unregistered entities

0
Companies Act

This article is written by Aabir Shoaib, pursuing Diploma in General Corporate Practice: Transactions, Governance and Disputes from LawSikho. The article has been edited by Amitabh Ranjan (Associate, LawSikho) and Dipshi Swara (Senior Associate, LawSikho).

Introduction

One of the most crucial decisions of the government was amending Section 366 of the Companies Act of 2013. The proposed change under Section 75 of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017 (‘Amendment Act’) relating to Section 366 of the Companies Act, 2013 (‘Act, 2013′) has been notified with effect from 15th August 2018, according to the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), enforcement notification dated 5 July 2018. Furthermore, on July 5, 2018, the MCA, through notification, issued the Companies (Authorised to Register) Second Amendment Rules, 2018 (‘Amendment Rules’). The aforementioned Amendment Rules will also go into effect on August 15th, 2018. Considering the dynamic evolution of the corporate sector, the intent of the amendment is fundamental, to strike a balance in the ease of doing business to corporate development.

Section 366 primarily deals with the registration of unregistered entities such as partnership firms, limited liability partnerships (LLPs), cooperative societies, and other organisations as defined by the Companies Act of 2013. The amendment allows such organisations with two or more members to register under the Companies Act, 2013 as a company limited by guarantee, a company limited by shares, or an unlimited company.

Unregistered entity under Companies Act, 2013

It is important to note that the term ‘Unregistered Company’ is not defined under the Companies Act, 2013. However the Act, 2013 does give an expression of the term in Section 375. According to Section 375, an unregistered company shall include any partnership, limited liability partnership or a co-operative society, association or company where the number of members is more than seven. Nevertheless, the meaning became clear under the Companies Act of 1956 (“Act of 1956”), as evidenced by Section verbiage as well as several judicial precedents such as those of Valli Pattabhirama Rao v. Sri Ramanuja Ginning & Rice Factory (P) Ltd and Salim Akbarali Nanji v. Union of India, to include partnership firms, societies, or any other entity created under any other statutory provisions being in force, subject to certain special cases and conditions. 

A firm that is not a joint-stock company is not required to register as a company limited by shares under Section 565. The term “Joint Stock Company,” as defined in Section 566 of the Act of 1956, has been abolished, but the principle has been preserved under clause (iii) of sub-Section (2) of the Act of 2013. Furthermore, the procedural features of company registration under Part I of Chapter XXI are not addressed in the act itself but are addressed in the aforesaid Rules, while the same was addressed in Sections 567 to 573 of the Act of 1956.

Provisions under the Amendment and its effects on unregistered entities

With two members, conversion to a corporation under the Act of 2013 is now conceivable

The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2017, changed this Section once, replacing the wording “seven or more members” with “two or more members” in Section 366(2) and inserting “a company less than seven members shall register as a private company” in the provision after clause (VI). These changes improved the clarity of this Section. 

Inclusion of LLPs, partnership firm, co-operative society 

The Amendment now allows registration of unregistered entities such as partnership firms, limited liability partnerships (LLPs), cooperative societies, and other organisations as defined by the Companies Act of 2013. The amendment allows such organisations with two or more members to register under the Companies Act, 2013 as a company limited by guarantee, a company limited by shares, or an unlimited company.

Aspects of the law : not a transfer

The registration of unregistered entities under the Act of 2013, however, is not the same as a transfer because it occurs as a legal operation and is not inter-vivos between the parties. The aforementioned arrangement is merely a conversion, in which an existing corporation is turned into a new registered company under the Act of 2013, rather than a transfer.

Furthermore, a transfer of a capital asset or intangible asset in the form of a business from a firm to a company as a result of the firm’s succession by a company is not recognised as a transfer in any way, according to Section 47 (xiii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The requirement is that the existing company should have acquired the assets and liabilities of the firm in the manner prescribed under Section 47(xiii).  In the matter of Vishal Containers P. Ltd. v. Assessee, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Ahmedabad took this approach.

Conversion does not attract stamp duty

On the transfer of property or conveyance, stamp duty is required. Section 3 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (the “Stamp Act”) specifies which instruments are subject to stamp duty. Moreover, the Stamp Act defines an instrument as “every document by which any right or liability is, or purports to be, created, transferred, limited, extended, extinguished or recorded”. The Stamp Act, 1899,  makes no provision for stamp duty to be paid on the vesting of property. Various courts of law have also taken the aforementioned stance. The following are excerpts from some of the topics:

  1. It was said in the case of Vali Pattabhirama Rao vs. Sri Ramanuja Ginning and Rice Factory (P) Ltd., AIR 1984 AP 176, held that “The Division Bench of Andhra Pradesh High Court relying on Section 575 of the Companies Act, 1956 has held that if a partnership firm registered as a company, there was a statutory vesting including of all immovable property and no separate conveyance was required for the same”
  2. The High Court of Delhi held in Union of India v. Mahalaxmi Saw Mills P. Limited: “If no conveyance deed is required for vesting of a property from a partnership firm to a company, it could not be said that any transfer of the property takes place which would require a levy of unearned increase;”

A partnership firm, with even two people, can be turned into a company as a result of the aforementioned change. This encourages corporatization, especially in the case of a real estate partnership. The following is stated explicitly in Section 368 of the Act of 2013:

“All property, movable and immovable (including actionable claims), belonging to or vested in a company at the date of its registration in pursuance of this Part, shall, on such registration, pass to and vest in the company as incorporated under this Act for all the estate and interest of the company therein.”

After reading the prior Section, it is clear and obvious that the property is transferred into the business without any conveyance, and the company is thus transferable through the transfer of shares. As a result, there is no stamp duty at the moment of conversion because the property has been vested. The Section has the effect of requiring automatic vesting and divesting. The properties are divested from the previous business and transferred to the newly converted company. Because vesting is a legal requirement, no registered instrument of transfer is required.

Conclusion

Section 366 deals with the registration of unregistered entities such as partnership firms, limited liability partnerships, cooperative societies, and other organisations as defined by the Companies Act of 2013. Significant amendments were made and its effect was largely beneficial to unregistered entities. The changes such as conversion to a corporation under the Act of 2013 with two members is now being conceivable; the inclusion of LLPs, partnership firms, co-operative societies and providing them with an option to be registered under the Companies Act, 2013 as a company limited by guarantee, a company limited by shares, or an unlimited company; registration of unregistered entities not tantamounting to transfer of property; conversion not attracting stamp duty, and partnership firms with even two people can now be turned into a company as a result of the aforementioned change. In addition, according to Section 375, an unregistered company shall include any partnership, limited liability partnership or a co-operative society, association or company where the number of members is more than seven.

While, the Amendment Act brought about a number of modifications, in the author’s opinion, the most significant was the inclusion of more entities under Section 366. By decreasing the number of unregistered businesses from seven to two, the Amendment Act encourages them to register as corporations under the Act of 2013, with the same set of owners, without the unnecessary burden of locating and inducting new members. As a result of the transition, there may well be an optimistic rise in corporatization, that encourages commercialization and better governance.

References

  1. https://vinodkothari.com/2018/07/amendment-in-Section-366-of-the-companies-act-2013/
  2. https://indiacorplaw.in/2018/07/corporatisation-prospects-unregistered-entities-amendment-Section-366-companies-act-2013.html
  3. https://advocatespedia.com/366._COMPANIES_CAPABLE_OF_BEING_REGISTERED_.%E2%80%94
  4. Section 75 of Companies Act, 2013 – Damages for Fraud | Corporate Law Reporter
  5. Companies Act, 2013 (mca.gov.in)
  6. Microsoft Word – 3853GI (mca.gov.in)
  7. CompaniesAuthorisedRegister_06072018.pdf (mca.gov.in)
  8. Vali Pattabhirama Rao And Anr. vs Sri Ramanuja Ginning And Rice … on 26 December, 1983 (indiankanoon.org)
  9. Salim Akbarali Nanji And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. And … on 1 November, 2002 (indiankanoon.org)
  10. Conversion Of Partnership Into A Company (financialexpress.com)
  11. No transfer as per Section 47(xiii) in case land acquired by assessee company from partnership-firm succeeded by it (taxguru.in)
  12. Vishal Containers Pvt.Ltd.,, … vs Assessee (indiankanoon.org)
  13. Section 3 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (indiankanoon.org)

Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/joinchat/J_0YrBa4IBSHdpuTfQO_sA

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

All you need to know about women empowerment in India

0
Identity politics

This article is written by Ishan Arun Mudbidri from Marathwada Mitra Mandal’s Shankarrao Chavan Law College, Pune. This article talks about women’s empowerment in India.

Introduction

“No struggle can ever succeed without women participation side by side with men. There are two powers in the world. One is the sword, one is the pen. There is a third power, stronger than both, that of women”. – Malala Yousafzai

For the overall growth of any country, the f-word is very important. And by the f-word I mean feminism. As mentioned in the above quote, with the participation of men and women together, any problem can be easily solved. Indian women have been treated differently since ancient India. Today, however, the times are changing, and this article throws some light on how Indian women are overcoming all the odds and emerging supreme.

History of women empowerment in India

Around 50% of the Indian population is women. Still, India has a disproportionate sex ratio. This is because women are still treated differently as compared to men, in different parts of the country. This problem has been seen from ancient India, where women were worshipped as goddesses and at the same time treated as slaves. In the Mahabharata, the wife of the Pandavas, Draupadi had to face all forms of inequality. This shows that women were treated lower than men. The ideal mindset of the society was to make the girl-child marry at a very young age. However, this state of affairs was weird and different as, on one hand, the daughters had the right to choose their husbands and on the other, they had to perform the practice of Sati. The British era brought various changes and improvements in this context as, in the West, women were treated equally and on par with men. In 1848, Savitribai Phule became the first woman educator in India. This gave women the courage that they can get out of the clutches of various forms. With the freedom struggle going on, women’s empowerment was the most important agenda for various social reformers and freedom fighters. Various social reformers like Raja Ram Mohan Roy, Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar, and even Mahatma Gandhi promoted women’s education, various other social norms like the abolition of sati, and banning child marriages, etc. This national uprising led to various reforms like the Abolition of the Sati Act 1829, the Hindu Widow Remarriage Act, 1856, The Child Restraint Act, 1929, The Women’s Right to Property Act,  1937, etc. The position of women in society started getting better after independence. The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, The Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1961, and The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, etc. were reforms that were implemented to save women from all forms of social injustice.

Constitutional provisions

Due to the injustices faced by women in Indian society, they were unaware of what Independence, freedom is. The Constitution of India changed things. The Constitution guaranteed equality and justice in all spheres of life. It granted equality to women and ensured that the State implemented various schemes for their benefit. Some of the various provisions that guarantee gender equality are:

  • Article 14 of the Constitution states that every person is equal before the law and has equal protection of the laws.
  • Article 15 prohibits discrimination of any citizen on the grounds of religion, race, gender, customs, caste, etc.
  • Article 16 provides equal opportunity to every citizen, in the context of employment to any office.
  • Article 39A directs the States to promote justice on the basis of equal opportunity and to provide free legal aid for securing justice to every citizen.
  • Article 42 directs the States to make provisions for just and humane conditions of work and maternity relief.
  • Article 51A states that it is the duty of every citizen to renounce practices that are derogatory to the dignity of women.

Legal framework for the protection of women in India

In India, the laws related to women are classified into two categories, which are:

The Indian Penal Code

Under the Indian Penal Code 1860, the following crimes against women are identified:

Special laws

Various legal provisions in India, ensure the protection and safety of women and their rights. Some of them are:

The Equal Remuneration Act, 1976

This Act was established to ensure that men and women both, get equal pay and wages for the work done and that there is no discrimination on grounds of sex, in the matters of employment.

The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961

The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 was established, to stop the practice of paying or accepting dowry as a consideration for marriage.

The Special Marriage Act, 1954

The Special Marriage Act came into force in 1954. This Act was established to provide a special form of marriage, irrespective of the faith or religion they believe in.

The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971

This Act was enacted to prohibit the practice of illegal abortions. This Act mentions the provisions by which a pregnancy can be terminated or aborted.

The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 

This Act was enacted to ensure that women are protected in their place of work. In the case of Vishaka v State of Rajasthan (1997), the Court laid down certain principles known as ‘The Vishaka Guidelines’. These principles were later converted into The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 

World policies on women empowerment

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women

The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women was adopted in 1979 by the United Nations General Assembly and came into force in 1993. This convention is termed an international bill of rights for women and their empowerment. It sets out the conditions and provisions for discrimination against women. This convention has 30 articles and it lays down the various measures, which all States accepting the convention must follow. These measures include:

  • To follow the equality between men and women, abolish all discriminatory frameworks enacted in the country, and implement laws that prohibit discrimination against women.
  • To set up courts, tribunals, and other organizations which make sure that women get adequate protection against any form of discrimination.
  • To end all acts of discrimination going on against women.

The countries which have accepted this convention, become legally bound by its provisions. India has also accepted this convention.

United Nations principles on women empowerment

Established in 2010, the United Nations Women’s Principles, help people understand how to empower women in every sphere of life. The principles are as follows:

  • Incorporate a high-level leadership to help maintain gender equality,
  • To treat all women and men equally, and not discriminate.
  • To maintain equality in giving employment to both men and women, promote education, provide professional training for the development of women.
  • To ensure the health and well-being of women.
  • To promote equality by implementing various initiatives.
  • To prepare a report on the progress of achieving gender equality.

Indian policies and schemes on women empowerment

In India, the empowerment of women and their rights has become a central issue. Post-independence, the government has enacted various commissions and policies for the upliftment of women. Some of those policies are:

National Policy for Women Empowerment 

The main objective of the National Policy for the Empowerment of Women, 2001, is the upliftment and well-being of Indian women. Some of the other principles of this policy are:

  • To create an environment where women realize their full potential.
  • To provide equal participation and opportunities to women, and also provide them with decision-making powers.
  • To give equal access to health services, quality education and training, equal pay and remuneration, all the necessary guidance required.
  • To incorporate effective courts and legal systems, to protect women against discrimination.

The National Commission for Women

The National Commission for Women was set up in 1992. It was implemented to protect the legal rights of women. The main objectives of the commission were:

  • To keep a check on the legal protections that are available to women.
  • To recommend legal measures.
  • To solve the grievances and issues of women.
  • To help the government in implementing various policies for women.

The commission consists of the Chairman, five members nominated by the Central Government, including one member from the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, and a member-secretary.

Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao

The Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao Scheme was launched recently in 2015 and has emerged as one of the important policies for women empowerment. This campaign aims to prohibit female foeticide. Other objectives of this scheme include education and protection of the girl child, creating awareness among the weaker sections of society, eliminate gender-biased sex. The scheme mainly targets the regions of Uttarakhand, Haryana, Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, and Bihar.

Support to Training and Employment Programme for Women (STEP)

The Support to Training and Employment Programme for Women came into force in 1986. This scheme was established to provide employment opportunities for women, and also the skill and training needed to become self-employed. Other objectives of this scheme include:

  • To provide training to develop various skills, for 5 years.
  • Helping various women groups to set up employment programmes of their own.
  • Providing access to health care, literacy, legal knowledge, etc.

The various sectors covered by this scheme are agriculture, animal husbandry, handicrafts, sericulture, fisheries, handlooms, etc. It also includes other skills like learning English, hospitality, travel, and tourism, etc.

Ujjwala Scheme

This Scheme aims to prohibit the human trafficking of women and children. It was launched in 2007. This Scheme was implemented by the Ministry of Women and Child Welfare Development. Some of its objectives include:

  • Preventing trafficking and sexual exploitation of women and children.
  • Rescuing victims and taking care of them.
  • Providing rehabilitation services and other amenities like food, shelter, clothing, medical services, etc.

Case laws where rights of women reigned supreme

The epitome of justice in India, the Supreme Court has been crucial in providing women with their rights. Some of these instances are:

Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma (2020)

In this case, the Supreme Court ensured that the rights of women in the Hindu Undivided Family are protected. The Court held that the daughters in a Hindu undivided family shall have equal coparcenary rights by virtue of their birth. This is irrespective of the fact that the daughters were born before the Hindu Succession Act Amendment in 2005.

Shayara Bano v. Union of India (2017)

In this case, the Court held that the practice of instant Triple Talaq is against the sentiments of the Holy Quran. This led to the Muslim Women Protection of Rights of Marriage Act, 2019. According to this act, any Muslim husband who pronounces Triple Talaq to his wife shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to three years.

The Secretary, Ministry of Defence v. Babita Puniya (2020)

In this case, the Supreme Court granted a permanent commission to the women in the Indian Armed Forces. The women now are eligible for ranks, benefits, pension, and other schemes in the forces which are given to the male officers.

Mackinnon Mackenzie v. Audrey D’costa (1987)

In this case, the Supreme Court delivered its first judgment on the Equal Remuneration Act. The respondent had alleged lower pay than her male counterparts by her company.

A few suggestions

Even after so much progress and development, India ranks 136th out of the total 187 countries in the Human Development Index. This shows that work needs to be done at the grass root level. Further, in the Global Gender Gap Report published in 2020, India’s rank was 112th. Gender inequality and discrimination still exist in various parts of the country and remain to go unnoticed. The following are few suggestions which can be adopted to help women prosper more than they already have:

  • The laws and schemes which are implemented for women empowerment, do not reach the majority of women. Most women are not aware of these laws. Hence, proper awareness and promotion of these laws are very important.
  • Women these days cannot openly go and talk about women-centric issues. This is usually seen in the rural and backward areas of society. Hence, a safe environment must be created, where women can come together and talk about women-centric issues and help each other.
  • The majority of women in India are illiterate. This makes women vulnerable and things get very difficult. Hence education should be made compulsory for every female in the country. Basic reading and writing material should also be provided to those women who cannot afford to buy.

Conclusion

Today, an Indian woman is a pilot, doctor, engineer, millionaire entrepreneur, and everything she wants to be. That’s how the times have changed. Women have proved to be better than men in all fields. However, as they were treated differently for so many years and were subject to equality since ancient India today, even after so many years, there still exist gaps in the context of women’s empowerment. In many parts of the country, women are still subject to inequality and gender discrimination. Many times, various schemes and policies implemented for the sake of women do not reach them. Hence, there are some serious concerns that need to be resolved in time.

References


LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/joinchat/J_0YrBa4IBSHdpuTfQO_sA

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Analysis of the Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code, 2021

0
Image Source: https://bit.ly/2ChfVqF

This article is written by Suchandra Mukherjee, pursuing Diploma in Law Firm Practice: Research, Drafting, Briefing and Client Management from LawSikho. The article has been edited by Amitabh Ranjan (Associate, LawSikho) and Dipshi Swara (Senior Associate, LawSikho).

Introduction

On 25th February, 2021, The Ministry of Information Government of India enacted new IT Rules for social media channels and OTT platforms which created a surge of tension under the country’s democratic line. As per new IT  Rules 2021, our social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp, Signal, and other messaging apps, as well as OTT platforms such as Netflix, Amazon Prime, and digital news, need to have a thorough mechanism for grievance redressal and cannot be given the status of protection. Because of these rules, there are a lot of controversies, especially concerning our freedom of speech and expression and our right to privacy.

The regulation has been named “Information Technology Rules, 2021 (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code)“. The Rules were drafted in accordance with Section 87(2) of the Information Technology Act of 2000, which grants the Central Government the authority to make rules in accordance with this Act’s provisions. Similar provisions existed previously under the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines) Rules 2011, which have now been repealed.

Various experts have given their personal opinions on this regulation, but before we get into it further, let us know what these rules are and how these changes in regulation would affect us.

These rules were published in the official gazette by the government. It is divided into 3 parts:

  • Part 1 contains the definitions and terms of these Intermediaries Rules.
  • Part 2 focuses on social media platforms like WhatsApp, Facebook, Telegram, Twitter.
  • Part 3 is all about OTT platforms and digital news.

As per the guidelines: 

  1. Social media need to abide by the laws in India- Social media platforms are being encouraged by the government of India to do their business in India but, they also need to follow the Indian laws and need not violate the provisions of the constitution of India. 
  2. Social media can be used freely for questioning or criticism-The major social media platforms that are active in India are WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and YouTube and as a basic fundamental right to express our views the users are entitled to ask questions, freely share their views on any government issues, as an essential element of Democracy. 
  3. Accountability- In the digital era with increased empowerment and also with an increase in misuse and abuse, social media platforms need to be accountable for all kinds of misuse.
  4. Redressal Mechanism- There is a need for a redressal mechanism for timely resolution of grievances, grievance redressal system has also been provided while uploading journalistic and creative freedom.
  5. The framework suggested is progressive and open to new ideas.
  6. The rules don’t intend to violate the freedom of speech and expression- The suggested framework addresses people’s concerns without infringing their right to freedom of speech, expression and thoughts of the users regarding any matter concerning the new regulations. 
  7. Differentiation has been made in terms of viewership- There is a difference between viewership in a theatre, television and watching it on OTT platforms.
  8. Intermediaries- These regulations are primarily focused on Intermediaries. 

As this regulation focuses on Intermediaries let us understand the concept of ‘Intermediaries’.

What is an intermediary?

An intermediary is a third-party service that acts as the link between people or two parties to convey a message or bring about an agreement or both.

For example; suppose there is a toothpaste manufacturing company that delivers its products to a local store and when you want to buy the toothpaste, you go to the local store. The local shop or the shopkeeper has neither made the toothpaste (i.e., not a manufacturer) nor they are using it (i.e., not a consumer). They are just taking the toothpaste from the company and selling it to us. In such a case the store is an Intermediary. Intermediaries are companies that facilitate this for both parties. A third party facilitates the execution of a transaction between two parties. It is because of them that the two parties have reached an agreement.

What intermediaries are there in this context? These kinds of Intermediaries are known as Internet Intermediaries. Facebook is an internet intermediary that allows you to communicate with your friends. In this case, Facebook acts as a middleman. The Intermediaries enjoy some legal privileges.

Understanding intermediaries with the help of case laws

Avnish Bajaj vs State 

On baaze.com, a fourth-year IIT Kharagpur student had posted an obscene MMS for sale. @125/piece. It wasn’t immediately obvious that it was an MMS video. Until someone clicks on it, that is. Baazi.com removed it from their website when it was brought to their attention. Because pornography is banned in India and the two people in the video were under the age of 18, the Delhi police’s crime section took cognizance of the situation and filed a charge sheet against the IIT student who posted the video on the internet. Another charge sheet was also filed, this time against the owner of the baaze.com account.

According to section 79 of the IT Act, intermediaries are provided immunity against any third-party information or data they provide.  However, this safe harbor is subject to Sub-clause (2) and (3) of Section 79 of the IT Act. 

Now, the question arises whether it is right to blame the owner of the website?

Because the website owner was unaware that the content was inappropriate, they removed it when they discovered it. Regardless, the website is still being investigated as a suspect. Would it be appropriate for the authorities to arrest a small Kirana store owner for selling dangerous toothpaste if the shopkeeper does not know that the toothpaste has any flaws or that harmful ingredients are in the product OR should the toothpaste manufacturer be held solely responsible? 

The answer is self-evident from a logical standpoint. The court has ruled on this as well, and in the case of baaze.com, the court stated that the owner of the domain is the owner of the website and will not be at fault when the users put some objectionable content on it. It is the sole responsibility of the users.

Conduit Laws – According to sec 79 of the IT Act all these Intermediaries are protected by some immunities known as the Conduit Laws because they don’t regulate the content unless a complaint is received under the authority of law. 

A famous example where a blog post had published some defamatory content against Dr Ashwin, a city-based cardiologist, his primary issue being Google Inc. allowing those blogs to post such defamatory content, to which Google said that they were only the medium/conduit, and were helpless to monitor what is being posted all the time. 

Shreya Singhal vs. UOI

In the famous Shreya Singhal vs. UOI on Section 66A of the IT Act 2000, the Supreme Court struck down as there was no clear definition for the words/clauses used in the following section.

The section basically deals with those acts that involve punishment due to offensive, fake messages through a communication device or computer resource which becomes the cause of causing annoyance, danger, criminal intimidation, insult, injury or inconvenience to some other person, then that person who has caused such would be criminally liable under this section of the IT Act.

The court in this case focused on a very important factor regarding the elements that constitute real knowledge under the Intermediary guidelines. It was held that knowledge constitutes upon being notified by the court or an appropriate government, and also said that if any intermediary fails to remove such content after receiving actual knowledge that such content is unlawful then it will lead to loss of the intermediary status and breach of due diligence.

Why is regulation required?

With the increase in usage of social media platforms and after the shift of the massive industry to IT-based platforms, social media giants and tech corporations have expanded their footprints in India, and with such expansion of usage by common people the misuse of these technologies is also being exercised. Rampant abuse such as Child pornography, fake news, revenge porn, abusive language, defamatory, and obscene contents have often threatened the dignity of women and hurts the religious sentiments which further results in the spread of disharmony, anti-national elements and to curb all such activities are like a challenge for the law enforcement agencies. In India, there was no such specific complaint redressal system for which user’s complaints could get redressed within a specific time period. Lack of transparency and absence of a robust redressal system has made the users fully dependent on the whims and fancies of such social media platforms, without giving any opportunity of being heard. Therefore, these regulations will act as a deterrence for such content and make the process more fair and transparent.

The rules

Intermediaries have been categorized into:

  • Social media intermediaries – This states that all due diligence is needed to be followed by all social media intermediaries.
  • Significant social media intermediaries – This states that all the additional due diligence that needs to be followed by intermediaries with more than 50 lakh users need to follow some extra set of rules.

Rules to be followed by intermediaries:

Social media intermediaries

Due Diligence

As per section 79 (2)(c) of the IT Act, a platform qualifies as an Intermediary only if it observes the due diligence as mentioned in the section and the guidelines as mentioned by the central government. Due diligence has not been defined and has been left to the interpretation of the courts. 

As observed in the landmark judgment of My Space Inc. v Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. Myspace was the owner and operator of a social media website www.myspace.com, where a third party could upload and view content, no changes were made in the content uploaded by the users, except additional advertisements being added. The court was to decide that whenever any third-party uploads objectionable content, what is the extent of liability of the platform and whether due diligence was enough in the publication of rules, privacy policy, regulations, and user agreement.  The court in evaluating the extent of liability of the intermediary, decided on the concept of knowledge as mentioned under Section 79(3) sub-clause (b) of the IT Act was knowledge based on specific information given by the person whose work was being infringed by the content uploaded on Myspace, which practically translated to the owner of a work providing specific URL addressed where the infringing content was located.

Grievance redressal system 

Grievance includes any formal complaint regarding any content, duties of intermediary-related issues, or other concerns relevant to the computer resource of the intermediary or the publisher under the Act. Such a grievance redressal system should be developed to resolve any such complaints from victims/users. A special Grievance Redressal system needs to be set up where an officer shall be appointed, and the name and contact details of such officer are to be shared by the intermediaries, to deal with such complaints. Within 24 hours complaints would be acknowledged and resolved within fifteen days from the date of its receipt.

Online safety

Dignity and online safety of the users, especially women’s must be ensured by the Intermediaries, and access to the social media platform by such offenders should be restricted to access within 24 hours of the receipt of the complaint. 

Voluntary mechanism

A voluntary user verification mechanism has to be adopted by these Intermediaries, which would give users confidence about the authenticity of the information on the verified accounts. This mechanism is similar to that of the regular KYC verification system used for online services.

Unlawful information

Intermediaries must remove such information which is against the law immediately upon gaining such knowledge, due to certain court orders or any appropriate government platform, and such information must not be published. 

Implementation

All the mentioned rules in the guidelines shall come into effect within 3 months after the publication of the regulation.

Significant social media intermediaries

First originator

According to the new rules social media companies need to disclose the first originator for any investigation related purposes in relation to offences such as rape, death threats, sexually explicit materials, things which can destroy the harmony of the state, be a threat to the friendly relation between states etc., but as claimed by WhatsApp itself that all the chats of the users are protected with end-to-end encryption which means that no third party, not even WhatsApp can read those private chats, but to comply with the new rules and to disclose the first originators name such privacy policy needs to be modified. In this clause the major contention lies as the privacy of the individuals would be violated. In this case, Intermediaries need not disclose that content to the first originator.

Appointments

Certain officers’ resident in India needs to be appointed for performing certain specific roles as follows:

  1. Chief Compliance Officer: Who has to be a resident in India and will be responsible for checking in compliance with all the rules and regulations.
  2. Nodal Contact Person: A chief nodal person who will be responsible for ensuring coordination with the law Agencies.

Monthly compliance report

A monthly compliance report needs to be published which will contain all the complaints and contents that are removed by the social media platforms while taking action.

What are OTT Platforms?

The IT Rules, 2021 have also attempted to improve the OTT Platforms (such as Netflix, Amazon Prime, and Disney+Hotstar).

Parental Control and Age Group Classification: –

The OTT Platforms must self-categorize their content into five age groups. 

  • U (Universal), 
  • U/A 7+,
  • U/A 13+, 
  • U/A 16+, and 
  • A is the age group (Adult)

The Code of Ethics also contemplates that the platforms must adhere to the age limit and may require parental control or locks for those of appropriate ages. One of the most important points at this point is that the Rules mention AI Automated Censorship.

Contentions

Data retention period

As per the new regulations, the Data Retention Period has been doubled to 6 months for Investigation purposes. An organization should only retain data for as long as it’s needed. Retaining data longer than necessary takes up unnecessary storage space and costs more than needed. 

In a country where there are no robust data protection laws, increasing the data retention period may jeopardise users’ privacy.

Breaking of the encryption clause

The identification of the first originator means that the users’ chats/private messages will no longer be encrypted, and anyone can read those messages, making the individuals’ private data unsafe. Furthermore, there is no clear definition of what constitutes “public order,” and the authority to determine what constitutes “public order” and what does not, should be delegated to the judiciary rather than the executive.

On December 24, 2018, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MEITY) released proposed regulations for public feedback. Individuals, civic society, industrial associations, and organizations submitted 171 comments to MEITY. There were also 80 counter-comments to these comments. These remarks were thoroughly examined, and an inter-ministerial meeting was convened, following which these rules were finalized. There are many stakeholders in India, but only 171 people have commented. Therefore, it’s not a very good statistic as there are millions of users but only 171 and 80 counter comments were received by the government.

This is a mistake on both sides; we have provided very little input to the government, and the administration has not informed the public, which is why the majority of people have not been notified. 

Conclusion

Every individual should be given the right to express their thoughts clearly when they believe that any government policy violates their fundamental rights, and if anything gets labelled as ‘against public order’ while expressing such opinions, it is an infringement on the fundamental rights of the individuals. Whenever any citizen feels that any content incites violence, they can easily take that issue to the respective courts in order to get an appropriate remedy. The rules are currently under scrutiny and many have said these rules to be anti-democratic and infringing the rights of the individuals. 

The rules with a robust data protection law can play a significant role in evaluating the social media and OTT platforms and can take proper steps to control social media misuse in the future. As social media platforms can be used to ask questions and receive criticism, therefore, such tools should be used wisely. Digital India has empowered its users with rights to use social media platforms and express their views but the misuse and abuse practised by certain users also need to be scrutinized to make them accountable for such actions.  The framework proposed is progressive and aims to address people’s various concerns while dispelling any misconceptions.

References

  1. https://www.meity.gov.in/writereaddata/files/Intermediary_Guidelines_and_Digital_Media_Ethics_Code_Rules-2021.pdf
  2. https://indiankanoon.org/doc/844026/ 
  3. https://www.mondaq.com/india/social-media/1063198/the-information-technology-intermediary-guidelines-and-digital-media-ethics-code-rules-2021-impact-on-digital-media-

Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/joinchat/J_0YrBa4IBSHdpuTfQO_sA

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

The constitutional validity of the Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition Act, 2019

0

This article is written by S A Rishikesh from the Institute of Legal Studies, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial University, Lucknow. This article tries to see the chain of events that led to the formation of the Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition Act, 2019. Thereby, checking its constitutional validity from the case of G. Mohan Rao vs The State Of Tamil Nadu (2021).

Introduction

The doctrine of the eminent domain gives power to the sovereign governments to compulsorily or forcefully acquire the property of a person upon the fulfillment of three conditions.

  • The property will be used for a legitimate public purpose, 
  • There should be payment of just compensation, and
  • The acquisition must be according to the procedure established according to the law.  

Land acquisition is the need of the government to defend the state, and for industrialisation, building roads, metros, airports, and other infrastructure for public use. Earlier the land acquisition was done by the Land Acquisition Act of 1894 which covered and regulated the entire process of land acquisition in India. This colonial-era Act was then replaced by the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation, and Resettlement Act of 2013 (or RFCTLARR). It came into force on January 1, 2014. But within a year of coming into force, it was sought to be amended substantially by the LARR ordinance. But it lapsed. When the government was unable to turn the ordinance into law, saying acquisition and requisition are the subjects in the concurrent list, they suggested that the state governments amend the law according to their needs.     

Tamil Nadu’s restoration Act

Soon after the LARR came into force, Tamil Nadu became the first state to amend the law in 2015 by the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation, and Resettlement (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 2014. It inserted a new section 105-A that said the provision of RFCTLARR will not apply to the certain Acts of Tamil Nadu or apply with certain modifications. These laws were:

  1. The Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Harijan Welfare Schemes Act, 1978
  2. The Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 
  3. The Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001

A report published by the Centre for Science and Environment, on RFCTLARR titled ‘Dilution by Design’ showed that the major land acquisition in the state was done by the latter two laws. These laws were based on the Land Acquisition Act 1894 and had many inadequacies. The state added in the amendment that it would issue a notification, within the timeframe of a year, to extend provisions of compensation and rehabilitation to acquisitions carried out according to the above-mentioned law, as per the provisions of RFCTLARR. But, it never happened. 

This amendment received presidential assent on January 1, 2015. After receiving the presidential assent the Tamil Nadu state government started acquiring land according to their laws and in response to it more than 240 writ petitions were filed in the Madras High Court challenging the revival of old laws. 

High Court disappointing the government

The matter was brought before the Madras High Court in the case of The Caritas India v Union of India (2019). Two judges bench of Justice S Manikumar and Justice Subramonium Prasad held all the acquisitions made under the state Acts illegal from September 27, 2013, the day the President gave assent to the RFCTLARR. 

The petitioner argued that from the date January 1, 2014, the RFCTLARR came into force, all the laws of the Tamil Nadu state government on a similar subject matter became repugnant under Article 254, and became void. This means that a subsequent amendment like that done by the Tamil Nadu government by inserting Section 105-A in the Act will not be able to revive the state Acts which have already become void. Even the Presidential assent to such an amendment will not protect the state Acts.  

The Court agreed with the arguments of the petitioner and followed the interpretation given by the Supreme Court in the case of State of Kerala v Mar Appraem Kuri Ltd (2012). Justice Subramonium Prasad held, “The provisions of Article 254(2) would not apply in the case of a law already made by the State, which has become repugnant as a result of a new enactment of Parliament. Article 254(2) does not offer any protection to laws made by States before the Central Legislation, which leads them to be repugnant, comes into force. It requires the entire repugnant law to be reserved for the consideration of the President, afresh, and the President must give his consent to the entire law. This law which otherwise would be repugnant is then specifically saved. These laws must receive his assent in the present sense.” 

The court also held Section 105-A to be inoperative as it has not fulfilled the conditions mentioned under Section 105-A(2) and Section 105-A(3). The court held the acquisitions made from September 27, 2013 invalid but an exception was made to the lands that had already been acquired and put to use. Because returning those lands “would be unscrambling a scrambled egg”. In such cases, the court ordered the compensation under the new RFCTLARR Act. 

The Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition Act, 2019

As per the High Court order, the only method of reviving the old Act was to make a new Act altogether and receive the Presidential assent. The Tamil Nadu government enacted the Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition Laws (Revival of Operation, Amendment, and Validation) Act, 2019, just two weeks after the High Court order. 

Some important provisions of the Act were as follows:

  1. The Act revived the operation of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Harijan Welfare Schemes Act, 1978, the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997 and the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001.
  2. The Act came with a retrospective effect from September 26, 2013.
  3. The provisions relating to compensation would be that of the RFCTLARR Act. Other than this no other provision of the RFCTLARR Act would apply. 
  4. The Act also had a validation clause that exempted “any judgement, decree or order of any court” except related to the determination of compensation from applying to the three state laws from September 26, 2013, until the day the Act was notified. 

The Act received the presidential assent on December 2, 2019. The Tamil Nadu government not only brought a new Act to revive the three old Acts but also challenged the decision of the High Court in the Supreme Court.  

Constitutional validity of the Act : the Supreme Court

The matter was brought before the Supreme Court in September 2019. The Supreme Court put a stay on the High Court order. The bench also said the matter also requires deeper consideration and would be disposed of in November 2019. But the hearing could not start until December 2020. Because of delays by the Tamil Nadu government.

Meanwhile, many landowners again reached the High Court against the new Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition Act 2019. The High Court in its order in September 2020 clarified that the Supreme Court has restrained the High Court from hearing any petition on this subject matter. Then the landowners knocked on the doors of the apex court invoking Article 32.

G. Mohan Rao vs The State Of Tamil Nadu 

The Indian Constitution sketches out a structure wherein all the three organs of a state i.e., executive, legislative, and the judiciary all have an independent function. The legislature makes laws, the executive enforces the law and the judiciary interprets the act as the guardian of the constitution. There is a system of checks and balances which the people have adopted but in day-to-day functioning, many times government institutions overstep each other. Similar contention has been made in this case. To what extent can a law declared unconstitutional by the constitutional Court be altered by the legislature to make it legitimate or reviving legislation, is a crucial question of this case. 

The land is an important resource for the development of a country. Similarly, the property rights of an individual hold an important place in the hierarchy of rights. 

Contentions of the Petitioner

The petitioners were landowners whose land was acquired under the 1997 Act and 2001 Act of the Tamil Nadu government. 

  1. The primary contention of the petitioners was that the 2019 Act of the Tamil Nadu government to revive the old Acts, declared unconstitutional, was an attempt to nullify the judgement of the Madras High Court. This act of the government was violative of the doctrine of separation of power.
  2. The High Court Judgement meant that the state legislature had to draft a new law altogether and not just bring an Act to revive the old Acts declared void. Further added that the moment an Act is declared unconstitutional there remains nothing to amend in it.
  3. The 2019 Act of the government applies RFCTLARR provisions for compensation, but not for social impact assessment, timelines for the various processes involved in acquisition and provisions related to fair procedure therefore it is not curative legislation but a foul under Article 254.
  4. The petitioners also tried to explain that the retrospective effect of the Act is fatal for the Act itself, emphasizing the word “made” used in Article 254, again making the 2019 Act repugnant.   
  5. The last contention made by the petitioners was that the 2019 Act was violative of Article 14, Article 19 and Article 21 based on unreasonable classification and demanded the State to explain under what special circumstances it was unable to implement Central government laws and had to draft its laws. 

Contentions of the Respondent

  1. The 2019 Act was enacted under List III of the Seventh Schedule to revive the old Acts and to obey the order of the High Court as the previous amendment by inserting section 105-A in RFCTLARR did not save the old Acts from becoming repugnant.
  2. Further emphasis was laid on the state’s power to enact a law retrospectively and that the 2019 Act was to protect the interest of the landowners, public interest and the state interest. 
  3. Also disagreeing with the judgement of the High Court, the respondents said that Article 254 does not make the entire Act repugnant but only some provisions of the Act. Therefore, there is no need to re-enact a new law from scratch.
  4. The 2019 Act is made following the High Court decisions and the defects pointed out by the Court have been removed making it constitutional. Adding to it they said that the 2019 Act is independent in itself and should not be compared line by line to the RFCTLARR Act. 

Issues as identified by the Supreme Court

Based on contention given by both the parties involved in this case, the Supreme Court drew out the following issues: 

  1. Whether the State legislature had legislative competence to enact the 2019 Act, a   retrospective validating Act? 
  2. Whether the State legislature transgressed the limits of its legislative competence having the effect of nullifying/overruling the judgment of the High Court, by enacting the 2019 Act? 
  3. Whether the 1997 Act and 2001 Act again fall foul of Article 254 on account of being repugnant to the 2013 Act, owing to the date of retrospective commencement of the 2019 Act?

Observation 

Legislative Competency

List III of the Seventh Schedule contains a list of subject matter upon which laws can be made by both the state and the union government. In case of conflict between the two, the union law would prevail as held by the Madras High Court while declaring the state Acts repugnant.  Entry 42 of List III contains “Acquisition and requisitions of property”. Using the same state they have made out their laws like that of the Tamil Nadu government and the union government made 2013 Act. 

After the High Court order, the Tamil Nadu legislature again used the same to revive the operations of the state laws. Now, the question here is can such a law be brought retrospectively? The answer to which will be yes, legislatures have the power to bring in a law retrospectively and it is well within the bounds of the constitution. It is based on the principle that the legislature is the main protagonist of the public interest. The legislature, therefore, is also given the power to validate an invalidated law. 

The Court quoted Ujagar Prints & Ors. (II) vs. Union of India & Ors (1989), “A competent legislature can always validate a law that has been declared by courts to be invalid, provided the infirmities and vitiating in factors noticed in the declaratory judgment are removed or cured. Such a validating law can also be made retrospective… All that the legislature does is to usher in a valid law with retrospective effect in the light of which earlier judgment becomes irrelevant.”

The legislature can make a retrospective law if it fulfills the conditions mentioned below:

  1. The subject matter on which the law is made should be within the jurisdiction of the legislature to make laws.
  2. The retrospective clause should be mentioned. It should not be to overrule the judgement of a court. 
  3. All the defects in the earlier law pointed out by the court must be removed or rectified in the new law.

Does the 2019 Act nullify the judgement of the High Court?

The high court framed four issues while hearing the case of The Caritas India v Union of India (2019). Here the question that arises is with the third issue regarding the revival of repugnant law. The High Court has held that an amendment i.e, inserting Section 105-A in the RFCTLARR will not be able to revive the repugnant law to do so the state legislature has to re-enact a law as per Article 254(2). 

The Supreme Court observed that the concept of repugnancy is to remove the inconsistency between the state and the union law. And Article 254 says that the law of union would prevail over the state law, but it says that states can revive their law by receiving Presidential assent, as done in this case.  

Effect of Retrospective commencement date of the 2019 Act

The Court held the contention given by the petitioner is untenable. And clarified that law is said to be made on the date it receives Presidential assent under Article 111, Article 254, or Article 200 (Governor) and not from the date of its commencement.

Judgement

Two judges bench of Justice AM Khanwilkar and Justice Dinesh Maheshwari held that “the 2019 Act to be a legitimate legislative exercise and find it to be consistent with and within the four corners of Article 254 of the Constitution of India and also of the High Court judgment.” Leaving the question of Article 14 open.

Conclusion

The RFCTLARR was bought at a time when there was anger among the landowners. Continuous protests, violent clashes between the police and the landowners, and dozens of court cases had almost halted all government’s major projects. The Act was introduced to appease the landowners but slowly with time the state governments with their amendments and getting Presidential assent have diluted the union law and we are again somewhere or the other following the colonial-era law.

References


Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/joinchat/J_0YrBa4IBSHdpuTfQO_sA

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Comparative analysis of pharma and digital space M&A regulations

0

 This article has been written by Shaunak Chaudhary, pursuing a Diploma in M&A, Institutional Finance and Investment Laws (PE and VC transactions) from LawSikho. The article has been edited by Amitabh Ranjan (Associate, LawSikho) and Dipshi Swara (Senior Associate, LawSikho).

Introduction

The pharmaceutical industry in the digital market space is quite varied in structure and a point of competition between the companies in the market. Pharma companies are regulated by a larger number of regulations and compliances as compared to the digital marketplace that is still developing. The considerations that go behind pharma combinations (mergers or acquisitions) can be; acquiring patents to increase market presence and share and control of prices in the market. Whereas in the digital space, a large driver for combinations is data acquisition for processing consumer data and ultimately selling the same or using it for targeted marketing. The first part of this article shall look at the regulations behind the pharma industry that pertain to mergers and acquisitions, and the second part concerns itself with the digital space for the same topic of analysis. 

Pharma 

As mentioned above, the two main points of contention when discussing mergers and acquisitions in the pharma industry pertain to patents and pricing that ultimately lead to the goal of market share and profits. Patents in India are regulated through the Patents Act of 1970. They maintain the monopoly of a drug that the company has invented to protect their rights in the market and give rights to the company to manufacture the drug or to give out patents. The drugs don’t need to be invented by the companies themselves as other institutions may also do so, but the companies that have the patent for manufacturing, either owned or given, would reap the benefits in the pharma market. Section 3(d) of the Patents Act is the most relevant in this area because the Competition Commission when considering restrictions under Section 4 or 5 of the Competition Act, 2002, would be concerned with the kind of patents the companies have to ensure that there is enough competition in the market. 

Section 3(d) speaks of the restriction on patents, which does not allow patents to be given to products that are a mere version of already existing products. If that new product does not have any new use it will not be given a patent. Derivatives of the same drug that have the same use shall thus not be granted new patents. As per the Competition Commission of India, this is in fact good for competition in the market since it does not make the pharma companies complacent and encourages more research towards medicines and techniques that are drastically different from the existing drugs. The Supreme Court in Bishwanath Prasad Radhey Shyam v. Hindustan Metal Industries [(1979) 2 SCC 511] has also laid down that the new product needs to be an inventive step and not a mere workshop improvement; it must lead to a new product and a new use or a substantially cheaper product. 

National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA)

The price of drugs in India is controlled by the National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA) that was given life through a resolution in 1997 as per the plans in the Drug Policy of 1994. The NPPA controls the prices of the Schedule I drugs as mentioned in the Drug (Prices Control) Order, 2013. Unlike the United State, India has a very strict pricing policy on medicines that try to create a balance between the market demand and the supply costs. It does not just exist to lower the price for the public but also to ensure that the companies manufacturing the drugs find it profitable to continue supply

Where the NPPA would be practising price control, there would be no scope for the companies to abuse their position post mergers or acquisitions to influence the market. On the other hand, when NPPA is not controlling the price, the companies may get some leeway but it can always initiate control over Schedule II drugs. 

Role of patents in M&A transactions

Patents are the primary concern in the field of mergers and acquisitions. If the Competition Commission’s position is that patents for drugs should be given only to those that invent or discover a completely new product with a new use, it will have to be more vigilant when it comes to M&A. Where there are a group of companies all having patents of separate drugs and having similar market shares in the country, and two of them decide to merge, their market share would double and that two holding different patents. The issue over here will be that since medicines and drugs are necessary products, the rules of demand and supply are skewed towards the company’s manufacturing and selling. They shall immediately gain a lot of bargaining power even against the government. Although the situation would not become like it is in the US, if the patenting system is such that strictly new products shall get patents, this may become an outcome if the CCI does not pay attention to this facet of the transaction even if the net worth of the companies are not hitting the Competition Act benchmarks. 

Digital Space

The regulations for mergers and acquisitions are essentially limited to the Competition Act when it comes to the digital space in India. The Competition Act does not explicitly mention data as a driver for combinations and does not give jurisdiction to the CCI pertaining to foreign company mergers that operate in India. The European Commission has the jurisdiction to regulate mergers through its Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004. Where the EU can judge the Facebook and WhatsApp acquisition, the CCI could not. Even though WhatsApp and Facebook are two of the most used messaging and social media apps in the country. The CCI looks into anti-competitive practices like in WhatsApp LLC v. CCI. The CCI was trying to investigate under Section 4 of the Competition Act, which is pertaining to abuse of dominant position. It was established in the case that WhatsApp has a dominant position in the market and that its potential to abuse non-price factors in the market could mean the creation of barriers to entry which would be a violation of Section 4(2)(c). Moreover, an agreement between Facebook and WhatsApp to share data with the parent company for tracking consumers not only through its platform but also WhatsApp can be a potential violation of Section 3, which pertains to Anti-competitive Agreements. 

This exercise is of interpretation and not of regulation. There are no strict norms that regulate mergers and acquisitions specifically due to which a lot of it can be left to the imagination of the companies. Seeing that several of these big data companies that perform mergers and acquisitions, often to the detriment of the market, are foreign companies that may or may not have subsidiaries in India, the CCI’s jurisdiction is limited. This is why today we have a duopoly in the e-commerce market that the government is desperately trying to regulate ex post facto the acquisitions that got them there and a monopoly in the web search market since the CCI essentially has no say what Google LLC can do. 

Comparative analysis

Pharma regulations and digital space regulations are drastically different when it comes to the considerations for why they are entering into a combination and the result of the combination. For one it is the control over patents and hence a greater bargaining power against the government, for the other it is the accumulation of data for selling or marketing. The CCI is obviously involved in both kinds of combinations but the complexity of a merger in the pharma industry would be far greater than what the digital companies would have to due to the existing limitations that have been there for decades. Moreover, what a company can do after the merger is also different. In the pharma industry, prices are regulated, hence, the end motive of profit is limited by regulation, but in the digital space, due to the novelty of the industry and the lackadaisical attitude of the governments towards their specific harms, the regulations are reactive than proactive and the jurisdiction of the CCI and their mandate relegates them to interpret the law instead of simply applying it. 

Conclusion 

The fact that in 2010, a detailed CCI recognized report on competition in the pharmaceutical markets was published with an exhaustive collection of the regulations that matter to the pharma industry gives an insight into the level at which the CCI has engaged in this matter. Weighing the importance of the two industries, it is clear that the pharma industry is more vital to the public as it pertains to a necessary commodity, and it is also much older than  others. But the regulations have to catch up with the times when it comes to the digital space as well and net worth or turnover de minimis requirements that do not consider non-price factors for mergers and acquisitions are outdated forms of judging the market. 

The NPPA post-acquisition/ merger between any pharma companies needs to be vigilant of the price effects of that combination in the market. Although they have the authority to control prices, that authority is not to be used indiscriminately and rather to be used parallel to market share changes and the introduction of new patents. 


LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/joinchat/J_0YrBa4IBSHdpuTfQO_sA

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Employee mobility between European Union countries

0
Image Source- https://rb.gy/uk0c8w

This article is written by Amrit Kaur, from Dr B.R. Ambedkar National Law University, RAI, Sonepat. The article talks about employee mobility between the European Union countries.

European Union

The European Union (EU) is an international organization that governs economic, social, and security issues for 27 European nations. Initially limited to western Europe, the EU expanded rapidly into central and eastern Europe in the early twenty-first century. On 31st January 2020, the United Kingdom, which was a founder member of the EU, withdrew itself from the organization. The Maastricht Treaty, which went into effect on November 1, 1993, established the European Union. By establishing a single currency (the euro), a unified foreign and security policy and shared citizenship rights as well as promoting cooperation in the fields of immigration, asylum and judicial affairs, the treaty aimed to strengthen European political and economic unification. In 2012, the EU was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in honour of its efforts to foster peace and democracy in Europe.

​​The EU’s parent organisation was established in the wake of World War II. The first goal was to promote economic cooperation, with the concept that nations that trade with one another become more economically interdependent, making them less inclined to engage in conflict.

The European Economic Community (EEC) was established in 1958 with the goal of promoting economic cooperation among six countries: Belgium, Germany, France, Italy, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. In a community characterized by inclusiveness, tolerance, justice, solidarity and non-discrimination, EU principles are shared by all EU nations. These ideals are inextricably linked to the European way of life. Some of these values are as follows:

Human dignity

Human dignity is sacred. It must be cherished and safeguarded since it is the true foundation of fundamental rights.

Freedom

Citizens have the right to freely move and dwell within the Union under freedom of movement. The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights protects individual freedoms such as respect for private life, freedom of opinion, religion, assembly, speech, and information.

Rule of law

The European Union is founded on the principle of rule of law. Everything the EU does is based on treaties that its member nations have willingly and democratically agreed to. An independent judiciary upholds the rule of law and justice. The European Court of Justice was given ultimate authority by the EU nations and its decisions must be followed by everyone.

Human rights

The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights safeguards human rights. These include the right to be free of discrimination based on sex, race or ethnic origin, religion or belief, handicap, age, or sexual orientation, as well as the right to personal data protection and access to justice.

The Lisbon Treaty and the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights establish these aims and principles as the EU’s foundation.

The European Labour Law

Generally, labour law defines one’s rights and duties as workers and employers. The key areas of EU labour law are as follows:

  • Working conditions – Working hours, part-time and fixed-term job, worker posting,
  • Notifying and counselling employees on collective redundancies, company transfers, and so on.

In recent decades, EU initiatives have tried:

  • To achieve high employment and strong social protection,
  • To enhance living and working circumstances, and
  • To safeguard social cohesiveness.

The EU’s goal is to promote social development and enhance the living and working circumstances for the European citizens. This can also be seen in the Preamble to the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU.

In terms of labour law, the EU supplements policy efforts launched by individual EU member nations by establishing minimum standards for:

  • Working and employment circumstances.
  • Educating and counselling employees.

Individual EU member states have the option of providing additional levels of protection if they so want. While the European Working Time Directive, for example, entitles workers to four weeks of yearly paid leave, several nations have chosen a more liberal right to the advantage of workers. 

With more than 240 million workers in the European Union, EU labour law rights directly affect a huge number of individuals and have a beneficial influence on one of the most essential and concrete aspects of their everyday lives.

Employers and society as a whole benefit from EU labour legislation as well. EU labour law helps in:

  • Establishing a clear framework of workplace rights and duties,
  • Safeguarding worker health, and
  • Fostering long-term economic prosperity.

Furthermore, EU labour law is inextricably linked to the single market. To ensure that nations and companies compete fairly on the basis of their products, not by reducing labour law standards, the free flow of commodities, services, capital, and employees is supported by labour law restrictions.

Legal background for labour mobility within the European Union

Article 45 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, 1957 (TFEU) enshrines the concept of free movement of labour. Until 1993, the treaty’s provisions on the free movement of labour only applied to economically active people (i.e., employed people and job seekers). The Maastricht Treaty, signed in 1993, breathed fresh life into the EU’s laws on the free movement of people, enshrining Article 20 i.e. the right of EU citizenship and giving all EU citizens and their family members the right (in principle) to travel and stay freely throughout the EU. 

These rules must be considered in light of the general principle of non-discrimination based on nationality established in Article 18 of the TFEU and Article 21(2) of the European Union’s Charter of Fundamental Rights. Secondary legislation, through Directive (EC) No 2004/38 on the freedom of Union citizens and their family members to travel and reside freely throughout the territory of member states, established additional precise rules to regulate free movement. The Directive consolidated earlier laws that dealt with different groups of EU members in different ways. 

Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 (replacing Regulation (EC) No 1612/68) establishes particular rights for employees and their family members in terms of free movement. As a result, all Union citizens and their family members enjoy the freedom to freely travel and stay throughout the member states’ territory. If they have adequate means and comprehensive sickness insurance coverage, inactive EU nationals have the right to stay in another member state for longer than three months. Another directive on measures to facilitate the exercise of rights bestowed on employees in the context of freedom of movement for workers attempts to ensure that the right to free movement is applied more effectively and uniformly and includes precise requirements for effective implementation. As a consequence of the Agreement establishing the European Economic Area (EEA) and the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons (AFMP) with the Swiss Federation, free movement of persons also applies to nations that are members of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA).

Recent developments in the field of labour mobility within the European Union include: 

  • In Austria, the transitional provisions of the Act on the Employment of Foreign Nationals, which govern the Croatian employees’ access to the labour market, expired on June 30, 2020. 
  • Regulation (EU) 2020/1054 of the European Union of 15 July 2020 amended a regulation and established new minimum requirements for maximum daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks, and daily and weekly rest periods as well as another regulation governing tachograph positioning.

Key findings of the annual report on Intra-EU Labour Mobility 2020

Based on the most recent available data (2019/2018), the annual report identifies trends in the free mobility of employees and their family members. This year’s edition also includes results on high-skilled worker mobility as well as mobility and demographic change.

The most recent events show that mobility in the EU grew in 2019, but at a slower rate than in prior years. In 2019, 17.9 million Europeans resided in another EU nation, 13 million of them were of working age. The number of working-age EU movers increased by 1.2 per cent in 2019, far less than the 3.4 per cent increase in 2018.

According to the research, two out of every three people who leave, return to their home country. Just under half of working-age EU movers (46%) lived in Germany and the United Kingdom, with the remaining 28 per cent residing in France, Italy, and Spain. Romania, Poland, Italy, Portugal, and Bulgaria remained the top five countries of origin for mobile employees in general, and active mobile workers in particular.

In 2019, the major sectors of activity for EU-movers were manufacturing and wholesale and retail trade, which employed 15% and 12% of EU movers, respectively and 16% and 13% of nationals. The proportion of high-skilled EU-28 movers has grown over time, in 2019, one in every three (34%) EU-28 migrants were highly-skilled, up from one in every four in 2008. According to the report, people are much more likely to relocate at the start of their careers, and the chance of relocation decreases with age.

According to the report, people aged 20 to 39 migrated more than other age groups in all major sending nations during the last decade. Seventy-five per cent of those who are very likely to relocate are under the age of 35.

High-skilled migrants typically work as professionals in fields such as business and administration, science and engineering or education. Overqualification, on the other hand, appears to be very common, with around one-third (34%) working in an occupation that demands a lower skill level than their qualifications (28 per cent in medium-skilled and 6 per cent in low-skilled jobs). Moreover, according to the research, high-skilled movers have a greater probability of reintegrating into labour markets when they return to their home countries than low-skilled movers. However, effective reintegration is dependent on a variety of circumstances, including social networks, the macro-economic situation and the sort of employment held overseas.

Impact of demographic change on intra-EU mobility

According to demographic estimates, all age groups under 60 will witness a drop in proportion to the overall population, while those above 60 will have a proportional increase. As stated earlier,  people of working age are most likely to relocate at the start of their careers and the chance of relocation decreases with age. With the younger population in exporting nations also falling, mobility flows may be reduced. However, population ageing may have an impact on the economic situation in both sending and receiving countries. With the expansion of higher education, there will certainly be a struggle for the increased number of highly educated but declining young employees. If mobility continues at its current rate, it will contribute to a significant population decline in most Eastern European countries and Portugal, as well as a small decline in Italy and Spain, and will speed up population growth in several Western European countries, with a particularly strong effect in Germany and Austria. A sustained trend of shorter mobility spells, as seen over the last decade, may help to mitigate some of the adverse repercussions on sending nations.

Different forms of labour mobility

Long term labour mobility

Long-term labour mobility occurs when a person relocates to a nation, in which they are not a citizen, for at least one year in order to work or look for a job. Long-term mobility should be differentiated from the legal phrase “permanent residency,” which refers to the right to live continuously in a country after a period of at least five years. 

Short term labour mobility

​​Since there is no European-level data source available, assessing short-term mobility, or people relocating to another nation for less than a year is extremely challenging. Short-term mobility is frequently conducted by cross-border employees or posted workers, according to the 2019 Annual Report on intra-EU labour mobility, which reaffirmed that short-term mobility is often performed by cross-border workers or posted workers (i.e. persons working in another country without changing the main residence).

Cross-border labour mobility

Cross-border mobility occurs when a person lives in one nation but works or is self-employed in another, and travels across borders on a frequent basis for this reason. It is to be noted here that this concept contains different meanings.

Posting of workers

It occurs when persons employed by an employer ordinarily conduct their business in one member state but post their employees to another member state to undertake work on his behalf for a limited length of time. It also includes posted self-employed persons, who are individuals who typically engage in a self-employed activity in one member state but relocate to another member state to engage in comparable activity.

Return mobility

Return mobility, or long-term movers returning to their nation of origin, is another type of labour mobility. Return mobility can only be approximated using data on nationals returning to their home country but cannot be termed in exact figures due to a lack of accurate numbers. In 2018, return mobility rose, with about 7,38,000 nationals returning to their home country. In 2018, return mobility was 65 per cent of the total number of citizens who left their country.

Economic convergence between the member states within the European Union

Intra-EU mobility is mostly driven by economic differences between member states. Macroeconomic dispersion manifests itself, among other things, in a broad range of salary differences for identical occupations, varied work prospects, income, and living circumstances.

Salary disparities between the origin and destination countries, as one element of economic convergence or divergence, are a significant, if not the fundamental cause of mobility among people who migrate for work-related reasons.

There have been concerns that the negative economic impacts of population ageing might jeopardize future development and convergence between the member states.

Impact of withdrawal of UK from the European Union on labour’s mobility

The freedom of movement of employees between the UK and the EU ended on December 31, 2020, which will have an impact on the structure and character of intra-EU labour mobility in the near future. Nonetheless, in accordance with the Withdrawal Agreement, the rights of current EU migrants working in the UK and existing UK employees in the EU’s 27 countries will be safeguarded. As of December 31, 2020, the ability of new EU migrants to migrate to the UK and vice versa will be determined by the respective migration rules of the UK and the member states. 

However, mobility to the UK has slowly reduced since the 2016 referendum to leave the EU, despite the fact that free movement remains in force. Whatever the future migration regime entails, it is almost certain to expand regulation, increasing hurdles to both skilled and unskilled labour inflows and outflows. New EU movers in the UK will be subject to a new migration policy designed to level the playing field, according to the UK government. While new EU migrants are given the opportunity to enter the UK labour market under that regime if they meet certain English language and salary requirements, the removal of EU law protection will result in restrictions on family reunification as well as a general reduction in rights and entitlements. This will very certainly make the UK a less appealing destination for skilled EU migrants, who may prefer to relocate to other big destination nations.

Impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the labour’s mobility within the European Union 

The COVID-19 situation has highlighted the significance of labour mobility for the economy and society. The COVID-19 crisis and the impact it has had on public economies and labour markets in Europe and abroad are likely to have a substantial impact on future mobility. In terms of economic and labour market harm, the European Commission’s Spring 2020 Economic Forecast highlights the considerable impact on both demand and supply, as well as the short and medium-term adverse effects of wide-ranging containment measures. Additional issues raised by the crisis include whether existing limitations on travel within Europe will be lifted if pre-crisis mobility trends will persist and whether EU migrants who have lost their jobs in another country would return home or stay abroad. In terms of direct effects, travel restrictions, both locally and internationally, the report predicts that the crisis will result in a significant drop in outflows in 2020, as well as a drop in inflows. The report predicted that there will certainly be sector-specific consequences as well. It mentioned an example of a recent study that emphasized the scarcity of healthcare personnel in several countries and recommended how to effectively facilitate their free movement during the crisis. If the crisis reveals serious shortages of healthcare personnel, member states may be compelled to increase recruitment from other EU member states, threatening shortages in their own countries. 

The agricultural sector, which relies heavily on immigrant workers from other parts of the EU, also faced difficulties, prompting the European Commission to issue guidelines on the free movement of workers during the COVID-19 outbreak and guidelines on seasonal workers in the EU during the COVID-19 outbreak. In the long run, the economic difficulties encountered by many businesses, particularly, but not exclusively, hospitality and tourism – would almost certainly result in higher unemployment in several countries, increasing the tendency of individuals to migrate and seek work elsewhere in the EU. According to the report, this will be conditional, at least in part, on the recovery of key destination nations and the availability of adequate employment opportunities.

Regional and national variance is also expected, with nations that were either less badly hit or were able to escape large-scale industrial lockdowns, likely to have an easier time getting back to normal. Individual nations’ assistance programs, such as furlough plans, compensation for individuals forced to self-isolate and unable to commute to work and stimulus programs targeted at specific sectors of the economy, will all influence regional variance. Mobility patterns are also subject to alter throughout time. Workers in the EU and abroad have been urged to work remotely or from home throughout the pandemic and to avoid taking public transportation. This move is unlikely to be permanent, but it looks that some workers will continue to work from home, either because they like it or because firms are downscaling their office presence in cities as a cost-cutting strategy. If individuals can adjust to this remote working schedule and find it gratifying and if they can find a new job opportunity remotely, they may be less likely to relocate in the first place.

Intra-EU labour mobility economics

The economics of labour mobility is quite evident at the EU-28 level i.e including the United Kingdom; increased mobility for the purpose of employment improves the allocation of labour resources within the Union and boosts economic production and welfare as a result of more efficient resources utilization.

However, depending on the long-run dynamics of labour mobility, there may be advantages and disadvantages from mobility at the level of each member state and among sending and receiving countries, in particular, linked to the question of whether and when workers will return to their home country.

Short-term effects

In the short run, high-unemployment sending nations should benefit from labour mobility. Labour mobility improves employment chances for individuals of such countries who do move to employment generating countries and this also relieves immediate demand on public resources by reducing pressure on retraining and educational facilities, as well as saving on unemployment compensation, healthcare and other social expenses. Most studies show that immigration has a minor but beneficial influence on recipient nations’ overall economic development and public budgets. The extent of this effect is determined by a variety of factors, including migrant workers’ pay income, family dependents and the welfare state’s general design.

Medium to long-term effects

Provided the long-term demographic outlook in most EU countries, as well as the significant element of “pay as you go old age” support, in which current workers pay a portion of public expenditure (pension, long-term care, etc.) related to the ageing population, a long-term loss of working-age population which will almost certainly be deleterious to sending countries. The bigger this effect is, the better trained the mobile population is. The central concern for receiving nations is whether migrants will have similar career paths and labour market engagement as locals in the long run, and how their use of public services and means tested benefits compares to that of locals. Due to a lack of physical and intangible human capital most notably, language skills, mobile employees may initially command lower salaries than natives. However, numerous other variables may also play a role.

Brain train, brain drain or brain waste

High-skilled people with a tertiary degree have dominated recent south-to-north migration patterns. However, when compared to the population, the absolute numbers are tiny. As a result, talking about a general brain drain is challenging, especially given the high rate of unemployment among recent graduates. Furthermore, if the majority of southern EU migrants subsequently return to their home countries with new skills and knowledge, the phrase “brain drain” is a more appropriate one, particularly if the alternative was unemployment in their home country. Due to the extreme magnitude of east-west movement, brain drain is a greater concern. Remittances can assist certain nations to mitigate the loss of human capital. If migrants do not use their talents in the destination country – so-called brain waste – the benefit of “brain circulation” will be diminished.

new legal draft

EURES jobseeker mobility network 

Labour mobility can play a significant role in the current scenario of high unemployment and wide disparities between EU member states. Today, substantial unemployment in other regions of the EU coexists with significant numbers of unfilled jobs in high-growth sectors. While responding to the demands of the labour market where there is a strong level of labour demand, labour mobility might ease the strain on employment in nations impacted by the recession.

Labour mobility, particularly intra-EU labour mobility, may be a strong adjustment tool for addressing imbalances, restoring dynamism, decreasing frictions and reducing societal suffering. Mobility can also aid in the launch of recruiting campaigns and meet the demands of a variety of companies by supplying them with the qualified workforce they require. Workers, for their part, might benefit from a smooth transition into work.

Therefore, here the EURES (European jobseeker mobility network) comes into play. It is a collaboration between the European Commission and public employment services in the European Economic Area (EEA) member states (EU member states plus Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein) as well as additional partners. Switzerland is also a member of the EURES initiative.

The EURES network, which was established in 1993, is in charge of exchanging information and facilitating collaboration among its stakeholders in order to assist in the realization of the free movement of employees. EURES encourages worker mobility and lowers obstacles to mobility by contributing to the establishment of an open and accessible European labour market for all, guaranteeing the sharing of job vacancies and applications and maintaining transparency in labour market information.

Objectives of EURES

EURES’ operational objectives are to notify, guide, and advise presumably mobile workers about job opportunities and the living and working conditions in the European Economic Area, to assist employers seeking to hire workers from other countries and also to provide advice and guidance to workers and employers in cross-border regions.

EURES provides placement and recruitment help, as well as information, advice, and guidance. This might include databases on employment opportunities, job search, living and working circumstances and individualized services. The latter is supplied in particular by 850 EURES advisers who have undergone specialized training and provide information and assistance to job searchers, job changers, and employers on all concerns related to the free movement of labour. In conformity with EU law, these services are offered without charge to all those who benefit from freedom of movement as per the EU law.

Conclusion

The labour mobility law within the European Union has its own advantages and disadvantages depending on the country and also the nature of the country i.e. whether it is a sending country or a receiving country. The EURES network strives to smoothen the employee movement within the Union. The withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU along with the crisis created by the coronavirus pandemic will have diverse long term effects on the labour mobility within the EU when compared to the pre-coronavirus trends of labour mobility within the European Union. Thus, all these effects could not be predicted now but these will surely be tested over time. 

References

  1. https://www.britannica.com/topic/European-Union
  2. https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/eu-in-brief_en
  3. https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=157&langId=en
  4. https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=89&furtherNews=yes&langId=en&newsId=9877
  5. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/MEMO_12_896
  6. https://www.intereconomics.eu/contents/year/2014/number/3/article/labour-mobility-in-the-eu-dynamics-patterns-and-policies.html

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/joinchat/J_0YrBa4IBSHdpuTfQO_sA

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Delimitation provisions in the Indian Constitution and important judgments

0
Constitution

This article is written by Vivek Maurya from ICFAI Law University, Dehradun. This article describes the constitutional provision which determines delimitation.

Introduction

The Central Government appoints a Delimitation Commission to delineate the borders of Parliamentary Constituencies in accordance with the requirements of the Delimitation Act, 2002. The current constituency delimitation was completed under the terms of the Delimitation Act, 2002, using 2001 census data. Despite the foregoing, the Indian Constitution was explicitly modified in 2002 to prohibit constituency delimitation until the first census after 2026. As a result, the current constituencies established based on the 2001 census will remain in effect until the first census after 2026.

Delimitation

Meaning

The process of drafting or redrawing the borders of parliamentary or assembly seats is referred to as delimitation. The procedure is repeated every few years to guarantee that each constituency has an equal number of voters, with the underlying reasoning being that each constituency has one representative in both the Lok Sabha and the state assembly across the nation. As a result, the exercise is performed after each census.

Delimitation creates a link between an increase in the population of a state and an increase in the number of elected legislators in that state. It guarantees that no delegates are “overrepresented” or “underrepresented.” It equalises the votes of the electorate by balancing the constituencies based on the strength of the electorate. Delimitation aims to preserve a “population seat ratio” across the Union or Federation, as well as across various constituencies within each State. In the Indian context, this justifies reserving seats for SCs and STs as well. The philosophical goal for the entire process is the notion of “one man, one vote, one value”.

Delimitation is a practice that has to be done regularly. Though the population continues to rise steadily, the impact of this is seen after a while, in the form of disproportionate population growth in various states and districts. As a result, delimitation is needed to balance the population in different States and constituencies at specified predetermined intervals. Most nations that consider delimitation to be a definite democratic activity do so regularly.

The Delimitation Act, 2002

The redrawing of the boundaries of an assembly or Lok Sabha constituency is known as delimitation. It’s done to reflect changes in the population of a state, a union territory, or the entire country. Delimitation is the process of allocating a set number of seats in a state legislature or the Lok Sabha to members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities. Thus, Parliament has enacted a Delimitation Act under Article 82 of the Constitution following each census. Following that, the Delimitation Commission, a high-powered organisation, is formed to carry out the process of demarcating constituency borders. The Commission’s decisions are legally binding and cannot be challenged in a court of law. An order made by the Commission cannot be changed by anybody; not even by the Parliament.

A retired or serving Supreme Court judge serves as the head of the Commission. The Chief Election Commissioner or one of the two election commissioners, as well as the election commissioner for the state where the election is taking place. In addition, associate members of the Commission are chosen from among the state’s five MPs and MLAs.

The Commission relies on the Election Commission workers to carry out the lengthy procedure because it is a transitory body with no full-time staff. Census data is collected for each district, tehsil, and gram panchayat, and new borders are drawn. It might take up to five years to complete the task. The Commission’s major responsibilities are to : 

  1. Appropriate distribution of seats in the national legislature (Lower House) across numerous states or provinces, large or small, while preserving as much as possible, the seat-to-population ratio in most, if not all, of the states or provinces.
  2. Drawing or redrawing the electoral borders of the states or provinces such that there are as many electoral districts of similar size and population as the number of elected MPs of the national legislature assigned to the individual states or provinces.
  3. Drawing or rearranging the electoral boundaries of each State or province in such a way that there are as many electoral districts of similar size and population as the number of elected representatives to the lower house of each State or province’s Legislative Assembly.

Delimitation provision in the Indian Constitution

According to Section 8 of the Delimitation Act, 2002, the Commission will readjust the number of seats or delimitation in accordance with the following provision of the Indian Constitution:

Article 81 – Composition of the House of the People

Article 81 of the Constitution, as it existed before the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act of 1976. The Lok Sabha was supposed to have not more than 550 members. Clause (2) of Article 81 stipulated that, for the purposes of sub-clause (a) of clause (1), a number of seats in the House of People are assigned to each State in such a way that the ratio between that number and the population of the State be, as far as feasible, the same for all States. Furthermore, clause (3) defines the term “population”, for the purposes of Article 81, to mean the population as determined at the most recent previous census, the results of which have been published.

As a result of this mandate, states that took the lead in population reduction faced the potential of losing seats, whilst those with larger population statistics stood to gain by increasing the number of Lok Sabha seats. To assuage these fears, Section 15 of the Constitution (Forty-second Amendment) Act of 1976 imposed a freeze on the population figure based on the 1971 Census as 54.81 crores, with a registered electorate of 27.4 crores for the purposes of the proviso to Article 81(3)(i), until the relevant figures for the first census taken after the year 2000 were published. The deadline was extended from 2000 to 2026 under Section 3 of the Constitution (Eighty-fourth Amendment) Act 2001.

Article 82 – readjustment after each census upon the completion of each census

After each census, the Parliament enacts a Delimitation Act under Article 82 of the Constitution. The Central Government established a Delimitation Commission once the Act came into effect.

The Indian Constitution was expressly changed in 2002 to postpone constituency delimitation until the first census after 2026. As a result, the current Constituencies, which were created based on the 2001 census, will continue to exist until the first census after 2026. The President of India appoints the Delimitation Commission, which collaborates with the Election Commission of India. retired Supreme Court Judges, Chief Election Commissioners, and Respective State Election Commissioners make up the Committee.

Article 170 – composition of the legislative assemblies

According to Article 170, a state’s Legislative Assembly must have a minimum of 60 members and a maximum of 500. In addition, if the Governor of the State determines that the community requires representation, he may select one Anglo-Indian to represent it. Direct election from territorial constituencies selects the elected members. The size of the population as determined by the most recent census statistics has been indicated as the foundation for constituency delimitation and seat distribution. The basic idea of proportionality of representation and one person, one vote is established in the article. Even though mathematical precision in proportional representation was not intended or feasible, the provisions added in Article 170 as in Article 82 have effectively made the primary provision and its concept useless. It’s possible that this is being done only for political reasons and electoral limitations. As a result, it’s impossible to support it on any other legal or non-legal basis.

The Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act of 1956 modified this Article. The scale of representation was omitted because it was thought that there might be States with populations of less than 4.5 million, in which case the two conditions of a minimum of 60 members and a scale of representation of not more than one member for every 750,000 people couldn’t be met at the same time. It was stipulated that the highest number of members would be 500 and the minimum would be 60 and each state would be divided into territorial constituencies. The population to the number of states ratio in each constituency would be the same throughout the State and each constituency will be the same throughout the State. The provision for constituency adjustments following each decennial census was kept.

Article 330 – reservation of seats in the House of People for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes

Article 330 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 3 of the R. P. Act, 1950, provides for the allocation of seats for Scheduled Castes and Tribes in the Lok Sabha based on the proportion of Scheduled Castes and Tribes in the State concerned to the total population.

Article 332 – reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Legislative Assemblies of the States

The Constitution (Fifty-first Amendment) Act, 1984 was passed to allow for reservation of seats for Scheduled Tribes in the House of People in Nagaland, Meghalaya, Mizoram, and Arunachal Pradesh, as well as in the Legislative Assemblies of Nagaland and Meghalaya, by modifying provisions under Article 332. Even though these States are predominantly tribal areas, the underlying goal of the aforementioned Article was to ensure that the members of the Scheduled Tribes in these areas were not denied even a minimal level of representation due to their inability to compete with the more advanced sections of the population.

Important Judgements

Meghraj Kothari v. Delimitation Commission and others, 1996

The petition was dismissed summarily by the Madhya Pradesh High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution, which sought a writ of certiorari to quash a notification issued in accordance with subsection (1) of Section 10 of the Delimitation Commission Act, 1962 in respect of the delimitation of certain Parliamentary and Assembly constituencies in the state of Madhya Pradesh. The petition was denied on the simple grounds that the notification could not be challenged in any court under Article 329(A) of the Constitution.

Association of Residents of Mhow (ROM) & Another v. The Delimitation Commission of India & Others, 2009

In this case, the Commission finally determined the delimitation of parliamentary constituencies in the state of Madhya Pradesh after taking into account all objections and suggestions received before the deadline and publishing its order in the Gazette of India and the official Gazette of the state, as required by Section 10(1) of the Act. The order placed them on the same street as legislation enacted by parliament. As a result, the notice must be considered as law and provided to.

Atma Singh And Others vs. State Of Punjab And Others, 2014

The writ petition was properly used by the voter to challenge the legality of the Delimitation of Constituencies notifications issued under Section 5(5) of the Act, and the Mandal Panchayat elections held pursuant thereto, according to the primary decision relied on by the learned single judge.

Conclusion

India is one of the world’s largest democracies and a key representation of democracy. The term “representation” in this context refers to standing in for someone else or working on their behalf. We all assess representation in the modern world by how elections are held in that country. While other democratic nations have chosen proportional representation, India has chosen territorial representation. As a result, the country is split into several constituencies for this purpose.

Now, if we want the country’s technique of representation to be faultless at the international level, we must ensure that it is flawless. It should not be the one in which the wordings are completely dissimilar to the real workings. And it is critical for this reason that the delimitation process not be placed in the hands of the general people, but rather in the hands of those whose votes matter and who can confidently figure out how to make each vote count.

References


Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/joinchat/J_0YrBa4IBSHdpuTfQO_sA

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Commercialisation and decentralisation of renewable energy and carbon tax

0
Image source - https://bit.ly/2Rl1PvY

This article is written by Shruti Yadav, from Jagran Lakecity, Bhopal. This article talks about the commercialisation and decentralisation of renewable energy as well as the carbon tax.

Introduction

In a 2018 survey conducted by the World Bank, figures showed that around 200 million people in India are still devoid of electricity. India is, however, the third-largest producer as well as consumer of electricity. But the inadequate distribution of energy has been a big issue. Environmental issues of using fossil fuels as energy resources like air and water pollution, their scarcity and near exhaustibility, and energy loss during transmission have also been reasons for concern. There was a dire need for an environmentally healthy energy production source present in abundance, or one that would not exhaust. The solutions to these issues came to be decentralisation and commercialisation of renewable energy. Also, to discourage companies from still using fossil fuels and emitting carbon into the atmosphere in any way, they had to be made liable for causing damage to the environment. Therefore, carbon tax entered into the equation and made for a great way to reduce carbon emissions. Income generated through it could be used to better the climate and environment.

What is commercialisation of renewable energy?

The commercialisation of renewable energy means bringing into action resources involving renewable energy technologies of over a hundred years or three generations. 

First-generation technologies

 They are already in use and are economically viable, they include:

  • Biomass: a fuel that is made from organic materials, a sustainable source of energy
  • Hydroelectricity: made by generators that turn by the flow of water.
  • Geothermal power: generated from geothermal energy using dry steam power stations, flash steam power stations, and binary cycle power stations.

Second-generation technologies 

They are market-ready but not widely in use, such as:

  • Solar heating: It is a system that relies on heat pumps that transfer the collected heat from the solar collectors to produce energy.
  • Photovoltaics: It converts light into energy using materials that exhibit the photovoltaic effect, a phenomenon studied in physics. 
  • Wind power is the generation of energy from wind. It makes use of the primary energy flow of the atmosphere from the uneven heating of the Earth’s surface due to the sun.
  • Solar thermal power plants: They are plants that trap the energy from the Sun to bring fluid to a high temperature. Then this fluid transfers heat to water, making it turn into steam, which is then used to produce energy.
  • Bioenergy: It is energy made from biomass or biofuel. Biomass is any natural substance that has sunlight absorbed and stored in the form of chemical energy. Such as wood, waste from forests, yards, or farms and energy crops.

Third-generation technologies 

They still require research and development to substantiate into significant contributors as energy producers. They include:

  • Biomass gasification: it is a  technology involving a controlled process of heat, steam, and oxygen to transform biomass into hydrogen without combustion.
  • Hot-dry-rock geothermal power: it is an abundant source of vast thermal energy stored within hot – but essentially dry crystalline basement rocks present in abundance beneath the earth’s exterior. 
  • Marine energy: the energy produced by ocean waves, tides, salinity, and differences in temperature of oceans. The water movement in the world’s oceans creates vast kinetic energy or energy stored in motion.

Impact on environment

Using fossil fuels to produce power has enormous environmental consequences. The burning of fossil fuels is mainly responsible for greenhouse gas emissions like carbon dioxide, methane, and other pollutants like nitrogen oxide and sulfur dioxide. The emission of such gases leads to severe environmental pollution and global warming. Production of energy through non-renewable resources also leads to contamination of water resources and degradation of land. Ultimately, reducing environmental impacts while producing energy was a significant incentive to shift to renewable energy resources for power generation. Developing technologies that exploit wind, water, sun, and geothermal resources to produce power is critical to address environmental and climate change issues. 

Although renewable energy sources produce relatively low GHG emissions and air pollution, transporting and manufacturing them will produce emissions and pollutants. For instance, the production of some photovoltaic cells generates toxic substances that may pollute water resources. Renewable energy installations can also disrupt land, wildlife habitat, flora, and fauna, and some technologies consume excessive quantities of water.

Understanding the impact of renewable energy on the environment is also significant for identifying the drawbacks, researching viable options for utility operations, and mitigating or offsetting these effects. Impact of renewable resources on the environment in-depth and individually are : 

Biomass

The burning of biomass for energy and power releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. However, biomass sources, such as crops and trees, also capture carbon dioxide during photosynthesis and conceal the emitted carbon dioxide. If trees and other plants absorb as much carbon dioxide as they let out during the biomass burning process; the carbon cycle will remain balanced. 

However, in reality, the amount of carbon emitted relies upon the combustion technology, the harvesting of biomass, the type of biomass being used, timing, and the energy resource it replaces. It may not be equivalent to the absorption of carbon by trees.

Consider this example, combustion of wood to produce electricity releases carbon dioxide into the air, but trees will regrow and seize the emitted carbon dioxide. However, forests can take decades to grow again and absorb carbon, so carbon neutrality depends on the time frame of absorption and growth. If companies burn trees faster than planting again and growing or burning trees that would otherwise be left unscathed in a forest, the carbon remains unbalanced.

Apart from the greenhouse gas emission implications, there are several additional environmental consequences to consider:

  • Plenty of bioenergy plants use waste, whether it be agricultural or animal, as fuel. However, many energy companies use timber from forest trees leading to deforestation, causing habitat loss, soil erosion, destruction of scenic beauty, and more.
  • Also, burning biomass in a solid, liquid, or gaseous state can emit other pollutants like carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides. In some cases, biomass can emit more pollution than fossil fuels. Unlike carbon dioxide emissions, many of these substances cannot be taken in by new plants. These compounds can lead to several environmental and human health issues if not correctly dealt with.
  • Plants require water, when energy companies grow trees and other crops for a bioenergy plant, they use large quantities of water for irrigation. On a bigger scale, this aggravates drought conditions, impacting aquatic habitats and the amount of water available for other purposes (crops, drinking, hydropower).

Some of the environmental drawbacks of bioenergy can be diminished through more sustainable forest management, meticulous food choices, and the way we harvest fuels. Further, research, technology, and policy development can help ensure that future advancements in bioenergy are more environmentally friendly.

Hydropower

Hydropower is an essential source of renewable energy but not devoid of environmental implications. Water quality keeps deteriorating around a hydropower plant. The other consequence of hydropower plants is that they fabricate migration barriers by hindering the natural flows of rivers and therefore affecting the habitat of various aquatic animals and plants.

Greenhouse gas emissions can also occur at hydropower plants. During the construction phase, the emissions can come from producing and transporting the materials needed for the construction and equipment.

Then during the operation and maintenance, the emissions can come from heating or cooling systems and transportation for maintenance work.

Hydropower plants can also lead to an increase in sedimentation.

Due to a hydropower plant, there can be shifts in water level, timing and temperature, affecting the surrounding terrestrial and aquatic ecosystem. The other problems from hydropower projects are the deprivation of biodiversity and ecosystems that perform services that are essential for all life forms. The loss of imminent vegetative communities, wildlife and habitats are a result of land clearance and the reduction of natural vegetation.

Geothermal energy

There are numerous environmental concerns to consider when it comes to building geothermal power capacity. 

The main concern of geothermal power plants is surface instability because geothermal plants separate water and steam from reservoirs and release it to the earth. The land above those reservoirs can sink gradually over a period of time. However, most geothermal plants re-inject the water into the earth via an injection to diminish the risk of land subsidence. Moreover, problems that can arise during the operation of geothermal power plants make the nearby areas extremely prone to earthquakes. Geothermal power plants are usually located near geological hotspots that are especially prone to instability. Drilling deep into the earth and removing steam and water can trigger small earthquakes.

Wind energy

As with all energy sources, wind energy can have adverse environmental effects, including the potential to reduce or degrade habitat for wildlife, plants, and fish. Furthermore, spinning turbine blades threaten the existence of flying animals like birds and bats. 

Solar energy

Some toxic substances and chemicals are used to make photovoltaic cells convert sunlight into electricity. Some solar thermal plants make use of hazardous fluids to transfer heat. Any leakage of these materials could be dangerous to the environment.

Large solar power plants can affect the environment in their vicinity. Clearing land for construction and power plant placement may have long-term implications on the habitats of native plants and animals. Solar power plants may also require water for cleaning solar collectors and concentrators or for cooling turbine generators. Using large amounts of groundwater or surface water for the same may affect the ecosystems that are dependent on these water resources. Moreover, radiation and beams for such plants can kill a lot of birds and insects.

Economic impact

Renewable energy can have social and economic benefits as well.

Many direct and indirect economic benefits are:

Employment opportunities

The sector provides many different employment opportunities, such as installation, engineering, manufacturing, marketing, sales, and more.

Renewable energy jobs are anticipated to continue to flourish well into the future.

Landowner income

Renewable energy also provides an extra source of income for rural owners of the land, who host wind farms thereon. Farmers can also earn money growing crops to be used as biofuels. 

Energy independence

Using renewable energy could aid nations in meeting energy needs domestically, reducing the reliance on foreign nations and susceptibility to capricious overseas energy prices and further reducing reliance on foreign oil.

Stable energy prices

Renewable energy facilities entail a substantial upfront investment, but after installation, they are economical to operate. This facilitates reducing fuel costs and ultimately makes the electricity produced comparatively cheaper. It also means the price of electricity is not constantly fluctuating like fuels, natural gas or coal. This leads to more stable energy prices over the long duration.

What is decentralisation of renewable energy?

Decentralised energy is generated off the primary grid and produced nearby to where it will be consumed, rather than at a large plant away and transmitted through the national grid. Decentralised energy generation requires using several smaller power generation plants and storage units that can be grid-connected to accommodate the power supply.

Decentralised energy can refer to the energy created from waste plants, combined heat and power, district heating and cooling, and geothermal, biomass or solar energy. These plants can provide energy for a single unit, a city or a community.

Need for decentralised renewable energy

Presently used centralised energy planning model neglects energy needs of rural areas and the poor and has also led to environmental degradation. In contrast, the decentralised energy planning model is in the interest of productive utilisation of resources. The individual villages are the minor social units where energy requirements occur. Renewable energy is a result of exploiting natural sources such as water, wind, solar, or biomass. Renewable sources are essentially non-polluting if applied accurately.  It is found that small scale power generation systems based on renewable energy sources are more capable and cost-effective. Thus, the focus should be on renewable energy technologies that can be executed locally by communities and small scale producers but can significantly contribute to the national energy supply.

Advantages of decentralised renewable energy

  • Among the advantages of decentralizing energy is reducing losses incurred while transmitting energy, making the network more efficient than centralized energy.
  • Certainty of supply is developed nationally. Customers do not have to depend on relatively few large and remote power stations.
  • There are various economic advantages as well. Long term decentralized energy can endeavour more competitive prices than traditional energy. While the initial cost of installation may be higher, a special decentralized energy tax could create more regular pricing.
  • It also helps to diminish carbon emissions as renewable sources increase the overall heat and power system’s efficiency. These are more stable and less vulnerable than centralized energy systems.

Decentralised renewable energy for universal energy access

Countries with a high energy access deficit will need to focus on establishing an efficient transformation of the energy sector to enable access to decentralized renewables for universal energy usage. Initially, this would mean the introduction of on-grid capacity, mini-grid and off-grid renewables into their national electrification plans, which basically means installing plants where there is an energy requirement to cut down on transmission loss. Energy access developments should be based on taking care of the current and future needs of various population groups and establishing different ways for satiating the increasing demand over time. This requires dynamic planning for access to energy that allows for the co-existence and integration of different technologies and system-sizes over time. The planning initiative should be taken together by various stakeholders, including the local private sector and civil society organizations and relevant ministries (health, education, water and agriculture) and governments at the international, national and local levels. Planning needs to be efficient, precise and gender-sensitive.

Carbon tax

What is a carbon tax?

A carbon tax is a charge that a government imposes on any company that burns fossil fuels. The most acclaimed fossil fuels are coal, oil, gasoline, and natural gas. When these fuels, which are rich in carbon content, are burned, they generate greenhouse gases. These gases include carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and methane, which lead to global warming and environmental pollution by heating the atmosphere and emitting toxic substances. 

The idea of a carbon tax is to exhibit the actual cost of combustion of carbon. Those costs are borne by those who endure the consequences, such as ordinary people, farmers, and eventually the government. Carbon taxes ensure that companies and consumers bear the external costs they impose on society.

Advantages of imposing a carbon tax

The benefits of the tax are.

  • Increasing the cost of carbon-based fuels will prompt companies to switch to renewable sources of energy.
  • The carbon tax will also raise the price of oils and electricity. Consumers will then become more cautious while using energy, further diminishing greenhouse gas emissions by eliminating wastage of energy.
  • Taxes empower industries to find the most cost-effective methods to reduce carbon emissions. That is a more suitable alternative to free-market economies than government control.

The economic impact of a carbon tax

A carbon tax also supports economic growth. For example, in the past 27 years, Sweden’s carbon tax has decreased emissions of greenhouse gases by 26%. During that corresponding period, its economy expanded 78%. A carbon tax can raise significant income. Income generated through carbon taxes could be recovered to consumers in the form of tax refunds or, it could be invested in projects pertaining to climate, such as advancing low-carbon technologies or building flexibility. Research suggests that using the revenues to decrease existing taxes on labour and capital can reduce economic losses and result in net economic gains.

Carbon tax and climate change

Individuals or businesses do not pay or are held responsible for direct costs from emitting greenhouse gases catalyzing climate change and the social damages that impact other people. Greenhouse gas emissions are “negative externalities” that businesses should start considering when making choices.

Policy intrusions of various kinds are necessary to address this concern. A wide range of policy tools is possible. Among them, carbon taxing, that is, charging companies, which emit greenhouse gases, a price equal to the value of the social costs borne through environmental pollution.—is an important policy tool to tackle climate change by discouraging businesses from causing pollution.

Conclusion

Climate change is often christened as the defining issue of our time. This is not an exaggeration. Amid climate change, the global economy is assumed to change profoundly. No country or industry is entirely immune to the forces of change.

Therefore, it is the need of the hour to shift to renewable sources of energy to preserve our environment and carry out sustainable development. 

This shift will only be possible through rigorous research and development of technology, decentralisation and commercialisation of renewable energy. Carbon taxing is also a significant way to promote the adoption of renewable energy sources.  

References


LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/joinchat/J_0YrBa4IBSHdpuTfQO_sA

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now
logo
FREE & ONLINE 3-Day Bootcamp (LIVE only) on

How Can Experienced Professionals Become Independent Directors

calender
28th, 29th Mar, 2026, 2 - 5pm (IST) &
30th Mar, 2026, 7 - 10pm (IST).
Bootcamp starting in
Days
HRS
MIN
SEC
Abhyuday AgarwalCOO & CO-Founder, LawSikho

Register now

Abhyuday AgarwalCOO & CO-Founder, LawSikho