CEO succession means finding the next leader after the current CEO retires or resigns. Although it is a most ignored step in companies, it is vital to scout or groom the leader at an early stage. Over a while, this buzzword has taken on an important position during board meetings. Many companies have realised that bad leadership or bad selection can become an impediment to a company’s growth.
CEOs are considered the face of the company and can be beacons of the reputation of the company. The selection of the CEO directly or indirectly affects, inter-alia, company investor relationships, employee motivation, the vision and mission of the company and the performance of the company in the long run.
CEO succession is most discussed in Indian companies, as most of the companies are promoter-driven or family-driven. These companies are facing acute crises of leadership in forthcoming generations or the next generation is not keen to take up the responsibilities. Hence, companies have to ponder their future identity and leadership – especially how the CEO would function and assist the overall business.
This article aims to find out the importance of CEO succession planning, key ingredients of scouting, various strategies, local vs. global company scenarios and many more by observing a few case studies.
Reasons for CEO succession
Although it is difficult to comprehend the exact reason for CEO succession planning, some of the top reasons identified by the industry for the current CEO are:
Retirement
Death
Resignation
Separated for any reason
Company transition into a new company
Reasons for companies overlooking succession planning and responsibility
In common parlance, succession planning is an indispensable job for the board of a company. It is not overnight work, it requires time and patience. Often, the board believes it is the responsibility of the management. However, it is a joint responsibility of the management, leadership executives and board. Also, it is necessary for the current CEO to groom or nurture the right fit in his or her absence.
They all must identify, interview and evaluate the successors from within the available company resources or scout outside the company. Things would be easy if the chief human resources officer took the lead and laid down a realistic foundation for talent identification. All the departments or stakeholders must make holistic efforts to ensure the new CEO is aligned with company policy and stakeholders.
Importance of succession planning
In the aforementioned paragraph, responsibilities and key stakeholders for the identification of a new CEO were outlined. The habit of succession planning can foster the growth of the company in the following ways:
Preparing the list of qualified leaders
Preparing the list would include SWOT analysis and be handy in case of an urgent replacement. The analysis would assist the company in identifying the candidates that are aligned with or could be aligned with the company’s vision and mission.
Investment in planning pays in the long run
The time investment in the process negates the possibility of uncertainty. The company can focus on other vital aspects. Moreover, planning fosters confidence in the shareholders. The character of the company evolves during the uncertainty, as does their handling ability.
Reduction in top executives’ attrition
Employees stay with the company where the opportunity to become a leader is provided. Succession planning signals to the top executives that they are being considered for higher roles and responsibilities. A strategy could be outlined to retain, mentor and train identified talent for the future role.
Solace to the company
During COVID-19, companies, where CEOs met sudden deaths, were perplexed about the future. They were not able to cope with the sudden demise of the CEO.
Notable case studies – successful and failed
McDonald
Crisis
The company operates in more than 100 countries and is known as one of the world’s largest food service retailers. It is widely appreciated for its success and studied in various B schools as case studies. However, in 2002, the company faced an acute price war from unorganized and small retailers that forced the company to close underperforming chains, moreover, they faced a million-dollar settlement for the job cuts. Mr James R. Cantalupo, a retired CEO of the company, joined the company and led the way, launching the program called “Plan to Win”. However, he died due to a heart attack and six months later Mr Charles H.Bell, his successor, also resigned after becoming terminally ill. This was a crisis for the company to lose two CEO’s in the same year.
Arrival of a new CEO
Mr James Skinner, was appointed to lead the company and fill the vacuum. Mr Skinner’s tenure was remarkable and the share price of the company tripled in a short duration. Mr Skinner was nominated as the “CEO of the Year” by various forums of the repute. This odyssey from the loss of the two CEOs in a year to becoming a successful case study, is unbelievable.
Background saga of success
The Company was proactively investing in the succession plan, 6 years before Mr Skinner became CEO of the company. Mr Cantalupo, President & COO, was considered the next in command and he was working in the shadow of Mr Charles Bell. Mr Cantalupo started his career in the company at the age of 15 and received ample opportunities before taking up the leadership role. His experience and mentorship from Me Charles became a stepping stone for him.
Meanwhile, Mr Skinner who commenced his career in the company had a very humble beginning as a Management Trainee, he was not a graduate and had 10 years of experience working with the Navy.
Mr Charles Bell’s “Plan to Win” program, had Mr Cantalupo and Mr Skinner in the team. Creating a pool of talent and core team that was groomed to rise on the occasion, saved the company. Soon after this Mr Skinner, inculcated the culture of nurturing young talents and preparing them for adverse situations.
Today, McDonald’s is admired as one of the most successful food chains around the globe.
Key takeaways
Long-term planning: Planning for not one but two CEOs enabled the company to rise in the crisis. Inculcating the culture of grooming young and top executives is a vital approach.
Backup planning: A bench or pool of talent is a vital aspect of a company. Just like in sports, teams maintain the talent pool for any adverse situation.
Teamwork: There is an old saying “If you want to reach fast, walk alone. If you want to reach far, walk with someone”. The same goes for a company, work should not be done in isolation.
Coca-Cola
Crisis
Mr. Doug Ivester retired in December 1999, aged 52. He had spent only two years as CEO. During this tenure, the company’s performance dropped significantly in all departments, inter-alia, shareholder equity from 56% to 35%, overall earnings and lost market share in many countries.
Arrival of a new CEO
Mr. Dough Ivester was appointed after the retiring CEO Goizueta’s. He was trained and mentored for 10 years by Mr. Goizueta. It was believed that he had imbibed the leadership skills and other vital skills of the erstwhile CEO to run the company. However, his certain decisions and ignorance over critical subjects made the board ponder their ability to run the company in the long run. Some of the decisions that raised concerns were:
During the economic meltdown and slow global economy, he did nothing to improve the company’s position.
He ignored socio-political contexts and stakeholder concerns on several occasions.
There was a contamination report in Belgium after students fell sick after consuming Coca-Cola. But he paid no heed to all this and business went similarly.
Many of the prominent top executives left the company after Mr. Ivester’s attitude towards working.
When the aforesaid issues were arising, Mr. Goizueta was not available to assist the new CEO. He passed away due to cardiac arrest, thus leaving Mr. Ivester alone in the system. Mr. Ivester is considered a good manager but is never remembered as a good leader.
Background saga of success
After two decades, Coca-Cola’s succession plan and strategy have improved significantly. Mr. James Quincy, current CEO and groomed CEO, is the quintessential of successful succession planning. He was given smaller assignments to lead the business, gradually making him a leader. Now, the company puts in a lot of effort and has plans for future leaders.
Key takeaways
Lessons that we learned from the poor succession in the aforementioned case study are:
Holistic development: Mr. Dough Ivester was a great manager and groomed under a great mentor. However, he never tested the water, i.e., small assignments or individual responsibilities were not assigned to him. Hence, he failed to meet the expectations of the board and stakeholders.
Succession plan: A person should not be groomed in isolation. In the aforesaid case, the board simply believed his predecessor was a visionary and hence he would be a perfect fit.
Backup plan: A company must have a backup plan or pool of talent to replace the leader. Everyone cannot excel in all the departments. It is vital to comprehend the skill set and assign the work in accordance with it.
Microsoft
Crisis: Mr Bill Gates, founder and innovator of the company, decided to step away from the daily task. The task was not very simple, as the company was looking for someone who comprehends the values, brand, and ethics and maintains innovation within the system. In the realm of Microsoft, staying abreast of industry development is also a vital aspect. The task of choosing a new CEO with all the skill sets was to make it an easy or overnight job.
Arrival of a new CEO
Mr. Steve Ballmer served the company from 2000 to 2014. During this tenure, he did remarkable work of transformation. He was abreast of the dynamic industry norms. Some of the notable works are:
Adopting new technologies and hiring the right talent at the top level.
The industry was moving away from the personal computer, or PC, first. He invested heavily in the newer technologies, making sure shareholders and the board were in alignment.
Adoption of talent retention strategies at various levels.
Key takeaways
Focused approach: The company had a focused approach to grooming and nurturing talent. Human Resource Management System (HRMS) played a pivotal role in the identification of potential successors.
Identification of skill sets: HRMS and the Board were in alignment with the skill set that should be present in the potential successor. It was never about filling the position but bringing a successor who looked for innovation, growth and creativity.
Company culture: The board and HRMS wanted to elevate someone who comprehends the company’s culture, values and strategic goals. Hence, Mr. Steve Ballmer was identified, who has been associated with the company for 2 decades.
IndusInd Bank
Crisis: Mr Ramesh Sobhti, is remembered for turning around the Indusind bank. He was in the leadership position from 2008 to 2020. During his tenure, he was instrumental in fostering customer loyalty, brand recognition and, most importantly, consistent earning growth. When he turned 70, his retirement was inevitable and the company was looking for a continuation of its growth.
Arrival of the new CEO: Mr. Ramesh, HR and the Board realised the gravity of the situation and focused on succession planning. In his last two-year tenure, he focused on finding the talent and setting expectations with the potential successor.
He identified a handful of people who would be a perfect fit.
He made sure there was no lobbying or bias within the team regarding potential successors.
Potential successors were allowed to make decisions and reach out to Mr. Ramesh for concurrence.
He ensured potential successors developed rapport within the team.
Once the board was confident in the choice, his name was officially revealed to everyone. Mr. Ramesh worked parallelly with the successor for the last four months to ensure a smooth transition.
Key takeaways
Identification of the crisis: The company was aware that they must have a competent replacement for Mr. Ramesh for the growth of the company. Mr. Ramesh initiated the process of succession 2 years before his retirement date.
Involvement: The team was aware of the replacement and they had started working with him, before an official announcement. Synergy and working comfort within the team were tested to ensure a smooth transition.
Infosys
Crisis
Infosys, a prominent IT giant in India, faced serious succession issues when its founders decided to step down from leadership positions. They decided to bring an outsider to lead the company. This step was initially criticised by the experts, but finally the abrupt exit of the new CEO, Mr. Sikka, cleared all the doubts.
Arrival of new CEO
Mr Sikka, was a veteran in the IT field. He was associated with a lot of companies, like HP and SAP, before joining Infosys. The initial problem of the succession was that when Mr. Murthy resigned in 2002, Infosys was under the leadership of other co-founders. Since its inception, the company’s focus has been only on building the business empire, values, ethics, corporate governance, etc. However, they failed to comprehend the importance of succession or never felt the need for it. Mr. Sikka was associated with SAP and immediately joined the company. There were rumours of differences in opinion between Mr. Sikka and the founders of the company. Many times, rumours were dispelled, but they became evident after his abrupt exit within 3 years.
Key takeaways
Resistance: Indian companies often overlook succession ideas, that have proved fatal in the long run. Something similar happened with the company.
Cultural difference: The outsider is not aware of the company’s growth philosophy, team culture and various other aspects. There is always a doubt of trust that persists between the founder, the team and the outsider.
Involvement: Outsiders may not like the involvement of the founder in day-to-day affairs. He may look for freedom while working and adopting any new idea.
CEO succession : global vs. local scenario
Indian Companies pay little attention to CEO Succession planning compared to Global companies. This concept is more prevalent and considered vital in institutions or MNC companies, as Indian companies are mostly family-run businesses. Some of the reasons for the difference have been outlined hereunder:
Family-owned businesses
In common parlance, India has witnessed many family-owned businesses grow from scratch into mammoth empires. They believe in passing on the legacy to the next generation. It is hard to accept that someone outside is going to run the show or business on their behalf. Many families believe that the outsider may not comprehend the culture, bond and working style of the company. However, nowadays, Indian companies are pondering about bringing CEOs from outside as the next generation is not keen to pursue the family business. They have diverse interests or are not competent enough to manage the growing empire and handle the pressure.
Regulations
SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India) have stringent norms when it comes to succession that also prevent companies from going out of their comfort zone. Moreover, company rating depends significantly on the face of the company or CEO in this case.
An inclination toward family successor by the board
Some of the directors who have served in MNCs as well as in Indian companies have the opinion that Indian company boards are more aligned towards internal succession programs. The board of directors consider outsiders as a competitor. The promoter and other senior management hardly consider age and mortality for the continuation of the business. There is no backup plan in case of an adverse situation.
Some of the prominent and big families in the country have realised the gravity of this concept and have actively set up a talent hunt and succession programme. Still, a road toward transformation is significantly far away.
Critical elements of succession planning
After comprehending the aforesaid case studies, critical elements of succession planning have been outlined hereunder:
Early initiation of the succession planning
“Prevention is better than cure” an old saying holds in this sense. There is no point in initiating scouting after the CEO is stepping down or vacating the office for any reason. In such events, either the board looks for a ready-to-move CEO from outside the company or elevates a senior person who may or may not possess the requisite expertise.
It is prudent to identify the situation from the following points:
Succession is a process that may happen over time, just like in IndusInd Bank or Coca-Cola’s current succession plan. Next CEOs are assigned numerous independent tasks to comprehend their strengths and weaknesses. Their performance determines the way forward.
Succession planning during an adverse situation: A similar situation was observed during the case study of McDonald wherein the company lost two CEOs in a year. Even in this adverse situation, the company’s performance was at its best. This highlights a conspicuous approach to Succession planning of the company.
Outlining company policies and future outlook
The company must outline the future policy that would be guidance to the new CEO. In the case of Microsoft, the new CEO was sure to keep abreast of the changing technology the company needs to venture into new areas by organic or in organic growth. Hence, he was able to achieve the desired results.
Moreover, outlining company policies and future outlook assists companies in circumventing bleak situations. This starts by factoring in macro and microeconomic outlooks.
A structured approach to navigate selection challenges
In the case of IndusInd Bank, the succession plan commenced 2 years before the retirement date of the CEO. A suitable candidate was identified and groomed in a way to comprehend the company policies, some of the independent responsibilities and tasks were assigned and performance was noted. He worked in the shoes of the retiring CEO for the penultimate year and received constructive feedback. This commitment from the Board, the retiring CEO and the employees ensured a smooth transition.
In the case of Coca-Cola, the new CEO was groomed under the retiring CEO; however, there was no one to provide feedback. Moreover, he faced difficulties in handling the pressure that became evident in his decision-making.
Communication
Internal and external stakeholders are vital pillars of a company. It is necessary to maintain transparent communication with them, which fosters confidence in the company. In the case of Coca-Cola, new CEO decisions were misunderstood and received negative reviews. The share price of the company took a significant hit and Mr. Ivester’s services were terminated all of a sudden.
Engagement with internal and external candidates
There can be only one CEO; however, the board needs a pool of talent to select and keep someone as a contingency plan. All the aspirants must be informed about their future roles and responsibilities. Chances are, potential aspirants may feel dejected and leave the company for better future aspects. Hence, the board must consider such situations tactfully and make sure there is no brain drain.
Furthermore, the process of selection should be transparent and robust to avoid room for discrepancies. They must provide constructive feedback and assign some new roles and responsibilities to boost their morale.
Succession planning process
Identification of potential successors
Conduct a thorough review of the organisation’s current and future needs to determine the skills, experience, and leadership qualities required for the next CEO.
Assess the performance of current employees through performance reviews, 360-degree feedback, and interviews to identify potential successors.
Seek input from key stakeholders, such as the board of directors, senior management, and customers, to gather diverse perspectives on potential successors.
Consider both internal candidates, who have a deep understanding of the organisation’s culture and operations, and external candidates, who may bring fresh ideas and new perspectives.
Development of successors
Create a comprehensive development plan for each potential successor, tailored to their individual needs and aspirations.
Provide opportunities for potential successors to gain exposure to different aspects of the business through job rotations, cross-functional projects, and shadowing senior executives.
Invest in mentoring and coaching programmes to support the growth and development of potential successors.
Offer training programmes to enhance their skills, knowledge, and leadership capabilities.
Selection of the successor
Establish a clear and transparent selection process that involves multiple stakeholders, including the board of directors, senior management, and key functional leaders.
Conduct a thorough evaluation of each candidate’s qualifications, leadership style, and fit with the organisation’s culture and values.
Consider factors such as the candidate’s track record of success, ability to inspire and motivate others, and strategic vision for the organisation.
Make the final decision based on a comprehensive assessment of all relevant factors, taking into account the long-term interests of the organisation.
In addition to these three main steps, the succession planning process should also include the following elements:
Communication: Regularly communicate the succession plan to all stakeholders to ensure transparency and build confidence in the process.
Monitoring and evaluation: Continuously monitor the progress of potential successors and make adjustments to the development plan as needed.
Contingency planning: Develop contingency plans in case of unexpected events, such as the sudden departure of the CEO or a key successor.
By following a well-structured succession planning process, organisations can ensure a smooth transition of leadership, maintain business continuity, and position themselves for long-term success.
Conclusion
The article illuminates the importance of succession by observing various case studies. A CEO is a beacon for the company and assists in the navigation of business. The selection of the right candidate cannot be attributed to luck, but to the selection process. A CEO must keep abreast of changing micro and macro economies.
Succession planning is a testament to the future planning of the company. The character of the company evolves during times of contingency. He must be groomed and mentored in a way to face the adverse situation.
The Board of Directors and HR department play a vital role in the selection process of the CEO. They must look for the longevity of the company and keep the succession plan on their priority list.
This article is written by Nishka Kamath. In this article, the author has made an attempt to discuss all the important types of IPR, including copyright, trademark, patent, geographical indications, designs, trade secrets, plant variety, and semiconductor integrated circuit layout designs. Further, other budding forms of IPR, including digital assets, biodiversity and traditional knowledge, are discussed in brief.
As the name suggests, the term ‘intellectual property’ is the creation of intellect, i.e., the human mind. It has the ability to protect the creation of the human mind and can be in any form, say, a logo, a new invention, any drawing, painting or piece of art, musical compositions, etc. Further, there are IP laws that help one (the owner) exclusively use his/her intellectual property and prevent others from using it without obtaining prior permission from the owner.
Moreover, intellectual property is an intangible (something that cannot be touched, seen or perceived) right that is exercisable in respect of a tangible work. Furthermore, one must note that there is a difference between ownership rights to a tangible product and the rights of an intangible nature. Let us understand this with the help of an example. Say, Ms. Radha has purchased a CD from a local market. Now, she has the right to own and possess the CD. She can also take action against any individual who possesses the CD without obtaining her prior permission. Simply put, the right of possession is the intangible right of the purchaser. Yet, Mr. Krishna, the composer of the music, will have several intangible rights over it, namely:
The right to reproduce the music,
The right to make copies of that musical composition, etc.
Also, one should note that these intangible rights of the composer are certainly not available to the purchaser of the music CD.
Additionally, there are several types of intellectual property, which are broken into two major categories, namely:
Industrial property, and
Copyright law.
Under these categories, the main types are segregated as:
Industrial property-
Patents:
Product patent, and
Process patent.
Trademarks,
Industrial designs,
Layout designs.
Literary property
Copyright,
Neighbouring rights:
Performers rights, and
Broadcasting rights.
In this article, an attempt is made to discuss all these important types of intellectual property in detail.
Copyright
What is a copyright: a brief overview
As the name suggests, a copyright is the ‘right to copy’. Simply put, the individual owning the copyright, i.e., the owner, has the exclusive right over the work and has the authority to make copies of the same. The Oxford Dictionary defines copyright as “the exclusive right to publish or record a work”. It can also be referred to as an intangible (something that cannot be touched) granted to the owner of any literary or artistic work for multiplying copies for a limited time period and publishing the same. In India, copyright provisions, rules, registration, etc., are dealt with by the Copyright Act, 1957.
Definition of copyright
Section 14 of the Copyright Act, 1957, defines copyright as the exclusive rights to do or give permission to someone to do some things with regards to-
Literary, dramatic and musical work,
Artistic work,
Cinematographic film, and
Sound recording.
Let us understand this with the help of an instance. Say, there is a boy named Dholu who is a writer and has written a book. In accordance with Section 14 of the Copyright Act, 1957, Dholu has exclusive rights over that work, meaning-
Dholu can reproduce the book in any material form, so hard copy and soft copy, both publications are permitted.
Dholu can further issue new copies of the book, share them with the public, and keep them for sale, and those copies do not necessarily have to be already in circulation.
Dholu can perform his work in public or share it with the general public, say, by reading his book in public through a public reading or radio broadcast.
Dholu can further produce a film or sound recording related to the novel.
Dholu can also get the book translated and publish it in other languages.
Dholu can adapt his novel into another form, like a screenplay.
In relation to a translation or an adaptation of his work, Dholu can perform/follow any of the aforementioned acts.
Please note: If someone other than Dholu wants to do any of the aforementioned pointers to his novel, he/she may need to get his authorisation. If he/she does not follow this, there is a possibility that he/she is infringing on Dholu’s copyright.
Examples of copyright
Example of copyright: a general view
Let us take the example of an Indian author and novelist- Mr. Bholu. As per Section 14 of the Copyright Act, 1957, Mr. Bholu has exclusive rights to his work, meaning:
Mr. Bholu has the right to reproduce the novel in any form, including storing it in digital form or producing a soft copy, alongside the hard copy.
Mr. Bholu has the authority to issue new copies of his novel to the public, not copies already in circulation.
He can further perform his work in public or communicate it to the public, like via a public reading or radio broadcast.
Mr. Bholu can also make a film or get a sound recording related to the novel.
Mr. Bholu can also get the novel translated into regional and foreign languages.
He can also adapt the novel into another form, like a theatrical or screenplay.
Further, with regard to the translation or adaptation of his work, Mr. Bholu can do any of the aforementioned acts. Also, if any other individual has to do any of the above acts, they have to get his prior permission. And if they do not, he/she could be infringing Mr. Bhlu’s copyright.
Examples of copyright gems of India
Cinematograph films
All the original scripts, dialogue, soundtrack, music and other creative elements involved in the movie are protected. For instance, movies like ‘Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge’ or ‘3 Idiots’.
Literary, dramatic or musical works
Literary work
Several original literary works, including novels, poems and essays of individuals like Rabindranath Tagore and Vikram Seth.
Dramatic work
A recent example of dramatic work would be the movie- ‘Oh My God’ an adaptation from a Gujarati play.
Musical work
Here, we can take the example of the very famous song ‘YAARAM’ which was originally written by Gulzar and composed by Mr. Bharadwaj. So, here, the copyright over the lyrics will belong to Gulzar, whereas the musical composition will be of the composer.
Original artistic work
Paintings, sculptures, drawings and other artistic works, including renowned personalities like M.F. Hussain and Raja Ravi Verma.
Sound recordings
Instances of sound recordings include songs by Indian musicians A.R. Rahman, Asha Bhosle, Lata Mangeshkar, etc.
Computer programmes
Copyright also safeguards software codes and other computer programmes, such as words, codes, schemes, etc. The famous software in the Indian market are companies like TCS and Infosys.
Characteristics/features of copyright
Originality
Copyright subsists only in cases of original work. Here, the term ‘original’ does not necessarily mean that the work has to be the expression of original or inventive thought; instead, it relates to the expression of the thought; however, it does not have to be in an original or novel form but must not be copied from any other work, meaning it should originate from the author. In other words, no copyright will subsist when it is in the form of any unauthorised reproduction of work or in a work which is not originated from the author.
Exclusive right
One of the most important features of copyright is that it is an exclusive right. It has a monopolistic effect, thus excluding other individuals from using it. Further, it is pertinent to note that even though the owner of the copyrighted work has a monopoly over the ‘work’, he/she does not have a monopoly over the ‘subject matter of such work.
Multiple rights
Copyright has numerous rights in the same work. Copyright law has assigned ownership of copyright with several other rights, like that of-
Reproducing the work,
Adaptations of the original work,
Translation of the work, etc.
Negative rights
Under copyright law, the owner of the copyrighted content, i.e., the original work, is protected from others. Simply put, one does not have the authority to use the copyrighted work of the owner or the author without obtaining prior permission or consent. Further, as the right is prohibitive in nature, the same can be regarded as a negative right that is available to the author against others.
Exists in the expression of ideas, not just the idea itself
One cannot claim copyright for an idea. Copyrights can only exist in material forms wherein the ideas are expressed. One cannot say that their copyright was infringed simply because an individual adopted their ideas or concepts.
Types of copyright
Copyright consists of a broad spectrum of protections when it comes to various forms of artistic expression; listed below are most of them.
Literary copyright
This sub-category includes original and distinctive literary compositions. Literary copyright may consist-
Scripts,
Biographies,
Novels,
Academic theses,
Technical manuals,
Software codes, etc.
Dramatic copyright
Generally, theatrical compositions fall under this category and include-
Scripts that are made for stage performers,
Mime shows,
Plays,
Dance choreography and
Any type of written work that is intended for live enactment.
Musical copyright
Under this sub-category, only musical compositions (to be registered with the Copyright Office) and not lyrics or sound recordings are protected.
Artistic copyright
This sub-category, among other artworks, includes:
Paintings,
Images and photographs,
Designs made by architect,
Sketches,
Diagrams,
Cartoons,
Engravings,
Graphics,
Sculptures, and
Blueprints.
Sound recording copyright
Under this sub-category, any form of sound that has been captured (or recorded), say podcasts, audible content, etc., is included. The owner who has such rights also has the right to-
Sell or lease copies of recordings to other organisations or individuals,
Broadcast the recorded audio to a wide variety of people,
Produce other derivative works or recordings that are originally inspired by the original work.
Cinematographic copyright
This sub-category includes all types of visual recordings that display moving images and these images can be captured using any technique, be it analogue or digital and mostly include video films.
Choreographic copyright
This sub-category includes works that are intended to protect unique dance patterns, sequences, patterns, and other types of organised movement.
Architectural copyright
Here, the intellectual property of architects and designers is like that of buildings, architectural plans or blueprints, detailed drains of any structure, etc.
Software and computer programs
Under this sub-category, computer software and programs, from their foundational code to their user interfaces, can be protected. This, in turn, helps in ensuring that the intellectual effort behind developing a software solution is recognised and protected.
Compilations and databases
Here, compilations like encyclopaedias, directories or databases can be protected from copyright infringement.
Ownership of copyright
Term of copyright
The duration for which a copyright is protected depends solely on the type of copyright. It is explained under various sections of the Copyright Act. Let us learn about each of them with the help of some examples.
Section 22: Published literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works
In the case of published literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works, the copyright subsists for the lifetime of the author until 60 years from the beginning of the calendar year, next following the year the author dies, as stated under Section 22. In cases where there is joint ownership, the author who dies last will be taken into consideration.
Example
Let’s consider this situation. There is a man named Golu who is a novelist. He published a book in 1980 and died in 2000. As per Section 22, the copyright for Golu’s book will be effective until 2060, i.e., 60 years from the start of the calendar year when Golu died.
Now, let us make some changes to this scenario. Say, Golu, is the co-author of a book authored mainly by Molu, his classmate, who passed away in 2010. Here, the copyright will last for another 60 years, i.e., until 2070, as Molu was the last to survive among the authors of the book.
Section 23: Anonymous and pseudonymous work
Under Section 23, copyright for anonymous or pseudonymous work will subsist for 60 years from the start of the calendar year following the year when the work was first published. Further, if the identity of the author is made known before the expiration of the said period, the copyright will subsist for 60 years from the time the calendar year begins following the year in which the author dies. In cases where there is joint ownership, the author who dies last will be taken into consideration.
Example
Let us take into consideration a scenario where there is an anonymous author, ‘Ms. Ka’ who published a novel in 1960. As per Section 23(1), the copyright will last until 2020, i.e., 60 years from the year it was first published. Now, the author decided to reveal her true identity in 1980, the copyright will last until 60 years from the beginning of the year following the death of the author.
Now, let’s take another scenario. Here, Mr. A and Ms. B published a book in 1960, whose identity remained anonymous. Then, Mr. A decided to disclose his identity in 1980 and died in 1990, and Ms. B decided to disclose her identity in 2000 and died in 2010. Now, as per Section 23(2)(b), the copyright will subsist until 2070, i.e., 60 years from the beginning of the year following the death of Ms. B, who was the last to die among the names of the disclosed authors.
Section 24: Posthumous work
Under Section 24, in the case of a literary, dramatic or musical work or engraving, wherein copyright subsists at the date of the death of the author or in the case of joint ownership, wherein the last author dies, and the work has not been published before that date, the copyright will last for 60 years from the beginning of the calendar year next following the year in which the work is first published. Further, if the adaptation of the work is published in an earlier year, the period starts from the year after the adaptation is published. Here, the term ‘published’ means it has been performed in public or if the recordings of the same have been offered or sold to the public.
Example
Let us assume there is a renowned playwright, Mrs. Verma, who died in 2020. She wrote a script titled ‘The Destination’ that was not published or performed while she was alive. However, in 2022, a theatre found this play and performed it for the first time. As per Section 24(1), the copyright of the script will continue until 2082, i.e., 60 years from the beginning of the calendar year following the year when the play was first performed.
Furthermore, let us say, Mrs. Verma had also written a musical composition titled ‘Track the Time’, which was unpublished or sold during her lifetime. However, she had made a sound recording of this track that was sold to a company after her death in 2021. Now, in accordance with Section 24(2), ‘Track the Time’ was published in 2021, thus, the copyright lasts for another 60 years, i.e., until 2081.
Section 25: Photograph
The same has been deleted via an amendment in 2012 and became effective on June 21, 2012. Prior to the Amendment, this Section would explain how long the copyright protection would last in the case of photographs.
Example
Let us take the example of Mr. Ghasitaram, who was a professional photographer. He clicked a unique photograph in 2002 and got it registered in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957. As per the original Act, the copyright for photographs will last for 50 years; however, the same was removed by the 2012 Amendment. So, now, if someone uses the photograph clicked by Mr.Ghasitaram without his permission he can claim copyright infringement.
Section 26: Cinematograph films
As per Section 26, the copyright for cinematograph films will last for 60 years from the beginning of the calendar year following the year in which the film is published.
Example
Let us take, for example, a scenario where there is a filmmaker, Mr. Karthik, who released a movie titled ‘The Stars of Bollywood’ in 1990. As per Section 26, the copyright of this film will subsist until 2051 (which can be calculated as follows: 1990, the year of publication + 1, the next calendar year + another 60 years = 2051. During this time, no person has the right to reproduce, distribute or display the film without obtaining prior permission from the filmmaker. And if someone does this, he/she will be liable for copyright infringement.
Section 27: Records
In accordance with Section 27 in case of sound recording or records, a copyright will last for 60 years from the beginning of the calendar year following the year in which the sound recording is published.
Example
Let us consider this scenario. Mr. Swarr published a song in 1980 and as per Section 27, the copyright will last for 60 years, i.e., until 2040. In this situation, he has the right to reproduce, distribute and gain economic benefits from the song. After this, the song will enter public domain, thus allowing anyone to use it without obtaining prior permission from Mr.Swarr or providing any sort of monetary compensation.
Section 28: Government works
Section 28 says that in the case of government work, where the government is the first owner of the copyright therein, the copyright will last for 60 years from the beginning of the calendar year following the year in which the work is first published.
Example
Let us take the example of the Indian Government and an artist named Mr. Kalakar. Say, the Indian Government commissioned an artist in 2021 to create a unique sculpture for a public park. Mr. Kalakar successfully completed the sculpture, which was unveiled in 2022 to the general public. Since, the Indian Government is regarded as the first owner of the copyright of the sculpture, the copyright will last for 60 years from the beginning of the calendar year following the year of first publication, meaning the copyright will subsist with the government until 2082.
Section 28A: Public undertakings
As per Section 28A, in the case of a work where a public undertaking is the first owner of the copyright therein, the copyright will last for 60 years from the beginning of the calendar year following the year in which the work is first published.
Example
Let us take an example of a government owned publishing house who published one of the many books in 2020. As per Section 28A, the copyright of this book will be owned by the public undertaking until 2080. So, until 2080, the public undertaking will have the exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, and adapt the work.
Section 29:International organisations
As per Section 29, in case of any international organisation to which the rules stated in Section 41 apply, the copyright will last for 60 years from the beginning of the calendar year following the year in which the work is first published
Example
Say, WHO (World Health Organisation) published a health research paper on 1st July 2020. Now, as per Section 29, the copyright of this research paper is with WHO until 2080, meaning no party, person, or individual has the right to reproduce, distribute or display the research paper without seeking proper permission from WHO. If they do so, it will amount to copyright infringement.
Registration of copyright
Section 44 to Section 50A discusses provisions for registering a copyright. Let us see what each Section says.
Section 44
Section 44 states that the Register of Copyrights must be kept at the Copyright Office.
Section 45
Section 45 talks about eateries in the Register of Copyrights.
Section 46
Section 46 states that indexes of the Registrar of Copyrights and indexes thereof shall also be kept at the Copyright Office.
Section 47
Under Section 47, forms and the Register of Copyrights and indexes thereof must be kept open to inspection at all reasonable times and any individual is entitled to take copies of the same or extract information from the same, provided the requisite fees to obtain the same are paid.
Section 48
Section 48 discusses the Register of Copyrights, which has to be prima facie evidence of particulars entered therein.
Section 49
Section 49 talks about correcting eateries (like changing the name, address, particulars or any errors that occurred accidentally) in the Register of Copyrights
Section 50
Section 50 discusses the guidelines related to the rectification of Register by Copyright board.
Section 50A
Section 50A deals with eateries made in the Register of Copyrights, etc., that must be published. It says that any work entered upon under Section 45 or the correction of every entry thus made under Section 49, and every change made under Section 50 shall be published by the Registrar of Copyrights in the official gazette or in such other manner as they deem fit.
Infringement of copyright
Fair dealing/fair use: exception to copyright infringement
Section 52(1)(a) and Section 52(1)(b) discuss acts that are regarded as fair dealing of any copyrighted work. Fair use or fair dealing can be referred to as using copyrighted material of any other individual for specific purpose, like-
Research,
Criticism,
Review,
Reporting current events,
Current affairs,
Giving lectures in public, etc.
Simply put, fair use or fair dealing means reasonable use. One must note that, whether or not an act comes under the category of fair dealing or fair use, would solely rely on the facts of that particular case; so there is no hard and fast rule per se to clever which all acts would come under the category of copyright infringement. The doctrine of fair use or fair dealing has some limitations to the extent to where it can be applied, they are as follows:
The nature, extent and quantum of use of the copyrighted work.
The main object behind using or including the work- whether it is for commercial or non-commercial purposes.
The likelihood of competition between the copyrighted work and the original work.
The impact the usage of the copyrighted material would have on the potential market value of the copyrighted work.
Civil remedies
Section 55 discusses the civil remedies available to the owner, viz.,
Injunction
This means restraining an individual by way of injunction from doing the act of infringement.
Damages
Here, infringing the copyright will attract a penalty in monetary form. There are two types of damages, namely:
One for infringing copyright, and
The other for converting copyright work into another form of work.
Accounts of profits
This relief is provided to restrict the unjust use of the copyright by the Defendant. Here, the owner of the copyright has the right to ask for profits which the infringer or Defendant earned by using the copyrighted material of the owner.
Damages for conversion
In addition to the aforementioned pointers, in the event that any individual converts the copyrighted work in any form without obtaining prior permission from the owner, the infringer is liable for damages. Such an act may attract a penalty relating to-
Criminal remedies (imprisonment from 6 months to 3 years, a fine, at times both), and
Administrative remedies (rights granted to authorities like the Registrar of Copyright, the Copyright Board and the Copyright Societies).
Criminal remedies
Infringement of copyright despite having proper knowledge of the copyright
Under Section 63, if a person having knowledge of a particular copyright, decides to infringe it anyway (the only exception being the resale of share rights in original copies under Section 53A), they will have to face imprisonment between 6 months and 3 years and a fine not less than ₹50,000/- and up to ₹2 Lakhs.
Second and subsequent conviction
Further, under Section 63A, for second and subsequent conviction, the penalty includes a minimum of 1 year and a maximum of 3 years of imprisonment, a fine of a minimum ₹1 Lakh and a maximum of 2 Lakhs.
Using or infringing copies of computer programs
Additionally, under Section 63B, if any person knowingly uses or infringes copies of computer programs, there could be a minimum jail time of 7 days and a maximum imprisonment of 3 years, a fine of a minimum ₹50,000/- and a maximum ₹2 Lakhs.
Making false entries
Under Section 67, if an individual makes false entries in the Register of Copyright, etc., for producing or tendering false entries, the penalty is imprisonment of up to 1 year or fine or both.
Making false statements
Under Section 68, making a false statement for deceiving or influencing any authority or officer, the penalty is imprisonment of up to 1 year, a fine or both.
Publishing a sound recording or video film in violation of Section 52A
Under Section 68A, publishing a sound recording or a video film that is against Section 52A (that talks about video and audio piracy) will attract imprisonment of up to 3 years and a fine.
Possessing plates/other materials used for making copies of the infringed material
Under Section 65, if an individual possesses plates or other materials that are used for making infringing copies, the individual may be charged with an imprisonment of 2 years and also a fine.
Landmark cases related to copyright
Literary work
In University of London Press vs. University of Tutorial Press [(1916) 2 Ch 601], it was held that examination papers are considered to be original literary work as the person who makes the question paper invests their labour and skill into making it. Such a person is said to be the author of the question paper and the copyright of such a paper will vest in him/her.
Further, in the case of Zee Telefilms Ltd vs. Sundial Communications [(2003) 27 PTC], the Bombay High Court held that even the concept notes that were made in relation to a television film, that have characters, notes, plots, sketches, etc., will fall under the category of literary work.
Dramatic work
In one case [Creation Records vs. New Group Newspapers (1997) EMLR 444], the England and Wales High Court (Chancery Division) held that a photograph that has no involvement of movement or action cannot be treated as dramatic work.
Musical work
In Gramophone Company vs. Super Cassettes Industries [(1996) PTC 252 Delhi], the Delhi High Court held that musical work is not simply a combination of melody and harmony or either of them, rather, it has to be printed, reduced to writing or graphically be produced or reproduced to copyright.
Cinematograph film
In the case of Balwindar Singh vs. Delhi Administration [Delhi AIR 1984 Delhi 379], the Delhi High Court held that any kind of video as well as television both come under the purview of cinematograph film. Simply put, cinematograph film is not simply related to the movies played in cinemas or theatres.
Ownership of copyright
In the case of Donoghue vs. Allied Newspapers [(1937) 3 All ER 503], the Court set forth a clarification that the originator of a brilliant, noteworthy idea is not the owner of the copyright in a work, unless he/she is also the creator behind that work. So, if an individual discusses one of his/her top notch ideas with another individual and that person copies the idea and converts it into a book, play, movie, etc., the latter will be regarded as the owner of the work as opposed to the former, the one who gave the idea. In other words, the one who merely spoke about a concept- the originator has no right or ownership in the product where copyright subsists.
In yet another case of V.T.Thomas vs. Malayala Manorama AlR 1988 Ker 291, the Kerala High Court held that if a cartoonist draws any cartoon after he/she is terminated by the employer of a magazine company, the proprietor has no right whatsoever to claim copyright.
In Glaxo Operations Uk Ltd. vs. Samrat Pharmaceuticals, (AIR 1984 Del. 265), the Delhi High Court held that a copyright exists irrespective of whether it is registered or not. The Court further claimed that registration is merely a piece of evidence as to when the author claims his/her ownership over artistic or some other work.
Infringement of copyright
In one of the most recent cases [Bombay Private Limited vs. Feel Good India and Anr.], the infringement of copyright with regards to artistic form consisting of label marks was established. Here, a pharmaceutical company manufactured cough syrups titled ‘Adulsa-Plus Cough Syrup’ and ‘Ayusas-Adulsa Cough Syrup’. The Court appointed a court receiver and reached the inference that the Defendant had not only infringed on the work of the Plaintiff but also attempted to discard goods from their factory and further mislead the Court. The Court passed an order that the Defendant pay a cost of ₹ 25 lakh.
Then, in yet another case [R.G. Anand vs. M/S. Delux Films & Ors. 1978 AIR 1613], the Supreme Court of India held that it is not crucial that an alleged infringement be the exact replica of the original work, but rather that the similarities between the original and the alleged infringed work are sufficient as an indication to claim that the same is a copy.
Trademark
What is a trademark:a brief overview
Basically, a trademark can be defined as a ‘mark’ that distinguishes goods and materials belonging to one individual from that belonging the another. In simple words, a trademark is said to be a visual symbol or a sign in any form, be it a device, a word or even a label for that matter that is used for identifying specific goods and/or services supplied by others. Also, the trademark or symbol can be in any form, including a combination of drawings, pictures, colours, words, letters, numbers, etc. For instance, the trademark of soaps like ‘Lux’ and ‘Rexona’ are identified by their names (trademarks), even though both deal with a similar type of product, i.e., soap.
Further, we can say that a trademark is a marketable and commercial asset of the owner. It is a type of intellectual property that has several rights. As opposed to a copyright that has a limited time period, a trademark is available to its owner for perpetuity. In India, any issue related to trademarks is dealt with under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Definition of trademark
As per Oxford Dictionary, a trademark is defined as any distinguished symbol that helps the general public identify a particular product of a trader. The symbol may include a device, words or a combination of them. Further, Section 2(1)(m) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, defines the term ‘mark’ as anything that includes:
Device,
Brand,
Label,
Ticket,
Name,
Word,
Signature,
Letter,
Numbers or numerical,
Shape of goods,
Packaging or combination of colours or any combinations thereof.
Further, Section 2(1)(zb) says a trademark is a mark capable of being represented graphically and which is capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one individual from that of others and may conclude:
Shape of commodities,
The packaging, or
A combination of both.
Examples of iconic trademarks from India
There are two types of trademarks: registered and unregistered. Let us understand this with the help of some examples.
Registered
In India, some of the most famous registered trademarks are as follows:
The brand name- Amul, known for dairy products, etc.,
The brand Kingfisher (known for its beer and other commodities),
The name and design of the car-Tata Nano,
The brand name and logo of Patanjali.
Unregistered
In India, some of the most famous unregistered trademarks are as follows:
Basmati rice (considered generic, so not registered),
Interesting fact: In 1977, RiceTech Inc., an American company, got Basmati Rice patented. However, it is considered a public right instead of a private right and no trader or individual can claim exclusive rights to using its name.
Alphonso mangoes (known as ‘Hapus’).
Characteristics/features of trademark
Based on several judgements, the following are some of the key characteristics of a trademark:
The definition of ‘mark’ and ‘trademark’ in themselves consist of a name under which goods, articles and commodities are sold (say, the usage of corporate names like ‘Bajaj’ or ‘Godrej’ or ‘Kirloskar’ are allowed).
A trademark is a mark like that of a label, signature, number, letter or a combination of all or any of them.
Trademark is a type of intellectual property and is liable to receive protection under the Trade Marks Act (or in accordance with the law).
A trademark is capable of being represented in a graphical manner.
A trademark must be used (or proposed to be used) in a manner that is related to the goods or services thus provided.
Preferably, a trademark must be an invented word.
A trademark must show some type of nexus (a connection or link between the product and the trademark) between the goods and/or services thus provided and the mark.
It may consist of the shape of goods and their packaging or a combination thereof.
It should give a proper description of the goods and/or services the product is thus offering, i.e., the name should be suggestive enough. For instance, The Beauty Shop has products related to beauty.
Types of trademark
Even though a trademark could be in any form, i.e., well known trademark, a house mark, name of a brand, collective mark, certified mark, etc., there are two basic types of trademark, as discussed above in examples. Let us take a look at both of them.
Registered and unregistered trademark
Registered trademark
Basically, as the name suggests, a registered trademark is one whose name is registered under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. In accordance with Section 2(1)(w) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, a registered trademark means any trade mark that is actually on the register and remains in force. Any usage of such a mark without obtaining prior consent from the owner of the mark may lead to the owner bringing an action of infringement against such a user.
Unregistered trademark
An unregistered trademark is one that is not registered under the provisions of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. This type of trademark is also addressed as a ‘common law mark’. There are numerous unregistered trademarks in India, maybe more than the registered trademarks. It is pertinent to note that, even though such a mark may not be registered, the owner of the mark has common law rights and will have the legal right when it comes to passing off the goods and hence, the owner can restrain the unauthorised use of such a mark, thus protecting the mark from being used or exploited.
Categories of trademark
Service mark
A service mark is a mark that is available in respect of services provided. Some instances of financial marks include-
Financial services,
Hospitality services, etc.
Property mark
A property mark is a mark that is used to indicate that a certain movable property belongs to a specific individual. It denotes the ownership of such a property.
Associated trademarks
As the name suggests, an ‘associated mark’ is a mark that is associated or joined to another mark. The most common examples of associated marks include the following:
The marks of Pidilite Industries Limited (PIL), i.e., FEVISTIK, FEVICOL, etc., all have the same prefix ‘FECI’.
Another example would be Amul Label for ice cream, milk and milk products.
Certification trademarks
Generally, a certification mark suggests that the products and services have undergone proper testing when it comes to quality, durability and stability.
Collective trademarks
A collective trademark or collective mark can be described as a trademark owned by its members to identify themselves with a level of quality or accuracy, geographical origin or any feature set forth by a company or organisation.
Existing registered trademark
An existing registered trademark can be defined as a mark that is registered under the Trade and Merchandise Act, 1958, immediately before the Trade Marks Act, 1999, came into existence.
Jointly owned trademark
In accordance with Section 24 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, in the case of joint ownership, the relationship between the joint owners is such that both parties, organisations or entities can make use of the trademark together; however, neither of them has the right to be the absolute owner of the trademark.
Ownership of trademark
A trademark owner can be any person, business organisation, or legal entity. A trademark can be located on any package, a label, a voucher or on the product itself.
Term of trademark
Interestingly, the most unique feature of a trademark is its perpetual life. Even though it has to be initially registered for a period of 10 years, it can be periodically renewed and can be used for an indefinite duration, with the exception that it is removed from the register or prohibited by a court order. It is pertinent to note that the first trademark that was registered in the UK under No. 1 of 1876, consisting of a red equilateral triangle and related to alcoholic beverages, is still in force to date.
Registration of trademark
Registering a trademark is important because it helps protect the proprietor’s rights. The rights given after registering a trademark are available to the proprietor for an indefinite time period by merely renewing the same, as opposed to other intellectual properties like patents, designs, copyrights, etc.
Section 3 to Section 17 discusses provisions related to the registrar and the conditions for the registration of a trademark.
Further, Section 18 to Section 26 talk about the procedure and duration of registration.
Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, discusses provisions related to the infringement of a copyright. The essentials of trademark infringement are as follows:
The infringement is similar to or same as a trademark that is already registered.
The mark is used in the course of a trade.
The infringed mark is much more likely to cause confusion on part of the public.
The infringement can even be by way of spoken words.
Infringement may also occur due to visual representation.
Remedies for copyright infringement
Civil remedies
The 3 basic civil remedies that are available to the proprietor in case of infringement are as follows:
Injunction-
Ex parte injunction,
Interlocutory injunction.
Damages or accounts of profits,
Delivery of infringing labels and marks for destruction and erasers.
The remedies are discussed under Section 134 and Section 135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Criminal remedies
Criminal remedies are discussed under Section 101 to Section 121 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. The criminal remedies include:
Under Section 102 and Section 103, the penalty for falsifying and falsely applying a trademark is minimum imprisonment for 6 months, maximum imprisonment of 3 years and a fine.
Under Section 104, the penalty for selling any commodities or goods or for services where a false trademark or false trade description is given is minimum imprisonment for 6 months and a maximum imprisonment of 3 years and a fine.
Under Section 107, the penalty for falsely representing a trademark as registered is imprisonment up to 3 years or a fine, at times, both.
Administrative remedies
Apart from the civil and criminal remedies available to the proprietor, the Trade Marks Act, 1999, also grants certain powers in the hands of administrative authorities to provide relief and remedies to anyone whose rights were infringed upon or aggrieved or to those individuals or organisations whose trademark was infringed. Thus, such powers may be exercised in respect of-
Under Section 7, classifying goods and services for registration.
Under Section 8, publication of alphabetical index for classification of goods and services.
Under Section 9 to Section 16, granting or refusing to register a trademark.
Under Section 22 and Chapter VII, correction and making amends in the Register.
Under Section 25, renewal, removal and restoration of registration.
Under Section 38, assignability and transmissibility of trademarks that are registered.
Under Section 45, registration of assignments and transmissions.
Landmark cases one must know related to trademark
First case
One of the first landmark judgments for filing a trademark related case was the ‘Whirlpool case’ and the case title was N. R. Dongre vs. Whirlpool Corporation 1996 (16) PTC 583, wherein the Supreme Court gave its judgement relating to passing-off action.
Please note: There is no explicit definition of the term ‘passing off’ in the Trade Marks Act; however, it has been mentioned in several Sections of the Act, like:
The courts have drawn its meaning from common law. Basically, passing off occurs when a mark is not only deceptively similar to that of the other mark but also creates some sort of confusion among customers that will ultimately result in damage to the goodwill and business of the owner whose trademark is not registered. The main purpose of passing off action is to ensure that no owner’s rights, goodwill or reputation are affected or exploited just because they have not registered their trademark.
Trade name
In Nirlex Spares vs. Commissioner of Central Excise (2008) 2 SCC 628, the Supreme Court stated that a trade name must be descriptive enough so as to indicate the link or relation between the goods and the mark. Thus, if a monogram (a symbol made up of a person’s initials) relating to a trade name is not descriptive enough to show that there is a relation between the product and the mark of a specific marketing company, one cannot say that it is a trade name of a marketing company.
Inventive trademark
In the case of Anglo French Drug vs. Hony-N-Bois 1989 PTC 289 (Bombay), the Court held that the registration for the term ‘Hepasyp’ for ayurvedic medicine was denied because it consisted of the deceptive words ‘hepa’ meaning liver and ‘syp’ having an obvious meaning syrup, which described the product for ailments related to the liver.
In Pidilite Industries Ltd. vs. S.M. Associates 2004 (28) PTC 193 (Bom), the Bombay High Court held that the Plaintiff was a registered proprietor of the trademark “M-SEAL”. The Defendant adapted and used the mark “SM SEAL” with all the important features of the trademark “M-SEAL”. The Court held that the Defendant’s usage of impugned marks was creating a lot of confusion and deception. The Court passed an order restraining the Defendant from using the trademark “SM-SEAL”.
The Delhi High Court in the case of Playboy Enterprises, Inc. vs. Bharat Malik 2001 PTC 328 (Del), passed an order restraining the Defendant from using the trade name “PLAY WAY” on the basis that the Defendant has adopted the word “PLAY” which is the heart and soul of the name of the magazine owned by the Plaintiff titled “PLAYBOY” with the main objective of exploiting the trade on its goodwill and widespread reputation.
In Decordova vs. Vick Chemicals 1951 (68) RPC 103, the Court of Appeal in Jamaica made an observation that a mark can be said to be infringed by another trader in case he/she even without making use of the whole of the mark or even anything related to the goods. Instead, even if the trader uses one or more of the distinct features of the mark or goods, it will result in infringement. The focus must be on the sound and significance of the words used in the mark.
In yet another case (Durga Dutt vs. Navratna AIR 1965 SC 980), the Supreme Court stated that when it comes to two marks that are identical to each other, one can say, there was an infringement. The Court claimed that when two marks are identical, no further question arises as to whether an infringement is made thereof.
Patents
What is a patent: a brief overview
As per Indian law, a patent is an exclusive right, privilege or monopoly that is granted to an inventor to make use of his/her innovative techniques or scientific talent and gain profit from the same. The main purpose of this system is to motivate individuals to invest in new techniques or make proper use of scientific innovation by promoting their protection and utilisation so as to contribute towards the progress of industries. This, in turn, contributes to promoting technological advancements and to the transfer and dissemination of technology. As per the system, patent rights make sure that the owner has property rights (also legal title) over their invention and the owner can make full use of the patent system and the pros the system and grant come with.
Please note: Patent rights are territorial in nature, which is why an inventor has to file different applications for patent registration in different countries.
Additionally, a patent can also be referred to as a ‘government licence’ which provides the owner/holder with exclusive rights to a process, design or new invention for a specific period of time.
Definition of patent
The term ‘patent’ comes from the Latin phrase ‘patene’, meaning ‘to open’. There is no comprehensive definition of this term; however, it is defined under Section 2(m) of the Patent Act, 1970, as “a patent granted under the Act and includes for the purpose of sections 44, 49, 50, 51, 52, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 63, 65, 66, 68, 69, 70, 78, 134, 140, 153, 154, 156 and Chapters XVI, XVII and XVIII, a patent granted under the Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911.
Examples of patented creations of India
In India, some of the most famous patented creations are as follows:
Patanjali Ayurvedic Products (has its main focus on Ayurveda and traditional medical systems).
Bharat Biotech’s Covexin (a national COVID-19 vaccine that helped curb this deadly disease).
Frugal Engineering Philosophy (a company developed by Tata Motors with the primary goal of building outstanding quality automobiles at prices that are considerably reasonable.)
This is one of the most common types of patent in India. It includes any type of invention or innovation in a product, process or even a machine. It is also addressed as ‘patent of inventions’. So, if anyone has innovated a new type of electric vehicle or any machinery that is related to solar power, he/she/they can apply for a utility patent.
Plant patents
To protect a new variety of plants, inventors obtain plant patents. This is one of the most important types of patents in India and is known to protect new plant hybrids and organically discovered plants. For instance, a type of African violet, a new type of almond tree, etc.
Design patent
A design patent is a patent that is known to protect any aesthetic looking goods that were produced or manufactured. Basically, design patents protect surface ornamentation of the product. In simple words, it protects the look of the product. So, an individual or organisation can apply for a unique shape or design and claim ownership of the same once the patent is granted. Further, if one wants to claim exclusive rights over any functionality of a particular product, one must file an application form for a utility patent. Design patents are pocket friendly in comparison to plant and utility patents. An instance of a design patent would be the bottle designed by Pepsi, which is known for its unique shape, look and feel.
Types of patent application
In India, there are 7 types of patent application, namely:
Provisional patent,
Ordinary or non provisional patent,
Conventional Application,
PCT International Application,
PCT National Phase Application,
Application for Patent of Addition,
DivisionalApplication.
Ownership of patent
Under Section 6 of the Patent Act, 1970, the following individuals can apply for a patent and eventually get their invention patented, thus granting them ownership rights:
Any individual who is claiming to be the true and first inventor.
Any individual who is the assignee of the aforementioned individual and one who has the right to make such an application.
Any individual who is the legal representative of any deceased person who just before his/her death, was entitled to make such an application.
Please note: An application for patent registration may be made either alone or in a joint manner which includes any other individual.
Term of patent
As per Section 53 of the Patent Act, 1970, talks about the term of patent. It stated the following:
When it comes to any invention that claims patent right for the method or process of manufacturing a particular substance, where the substance is intended for use or has the ability to be used as food, medicine or drug, the term would be 5 years from the date the patent was sealed (i.e., the date the patent was sealed by the Patent Office), or 7 years from the date of patent, i.e., the date when complete specification was filed, whichever period is shorter.
When it comes to other inventions, the term would be 14 years from the date of patent.
Now, after the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002, the provision says:
For every patent granted after the above Amendment was carried on, the term of patent shall be twenty years from the date of filing of the application for the patent.
It further says, if the requisite amounts or fees are not paid to renew the patent, the patent shall not be entitled to be protected further.
Registration of patent
In order to register a patent, one has to follow the following steps:
Step 1:File an application in the patent office.
Step 2:Provisional/complete specification should be filed.
Step3:Acceptance of Specification.
Step 4:Publication of Application.
Step 5:Request for Application.
Step 6:Examination and Report of Examiner.
Step 7:Approval.
Or
In case there are any objections, there will be a division of application and then amendment after opposition or objection, then the patent will be granted/approved.
Sections that discuss registration
The sections related to the application or registration of a patent are as follows:
Section 6
Section 6 talks about the individuals who have the right to apply for a patent.
Section 7
Section 7 discusses the form of the patent application.
Section 8
Section 8 lays down special provisions that are required when it comes to foreign applications.
Section 9
Section 9 discusses provisional and complete specifications.
Section 10
Section 10 includes the content required at the time of filing provisional and complete specifications.
Section 11
Section 11 talks about publication and examination of applications.
Infringement of patent
Infringement of patent:the basics
Acts that amount to infringement of a patent
The following acts will amount to infringement of a patent:
If an individual or company has actually produced the patented article without obtaining prior permission from the patentee.
If the individual or organisation uses a patent process without seeking consent of the patentee.
If any individual uses, exercises, sells or distributes any patented article or process without having any lawful authority to do so.
Acts not amounting to infringement of a patent
The following acts do not amount to infringement:
There was an innocent use of the patented material or process.
The use was for experimentation and instruction purposes.
The use was for invention in foreign vessels.
Remedies for infringement of a patent
A patentee, licensee, assignee, or the co-owner has the authority to file a suit within 3 years from the date of infringement. The individual(s) can seek the following remedies:
Declaration
In accordance with the Specific Relief Act, 1963, a patentee may claim a declaration stating that the act of the infringer must be said to be unlawful and that there be a declaration that the patentee receives compensation for the act of infringement.
Injunction
Further, relief of injunction can be claimed under Section 38 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. Thus, a perpetual injunction (commonly known as a permanent injunction) is granted against the infringer in the Civil Court.
Damages
The patentee has the right to seek liquidated or unliquidated damages from the infringer.
Accounts for profit
Whatever profit has been incurred by the infringer while infringing the patent, a patentee may claim that the same be transferred to their account.
Certificate of validity
The patentee may also seek remedy from the court that the certificate in his favour be issued, declaring the validity and duration of the certificate in favour of the patentee to safeguard the interest of the patentee.
Cost
The patentee also has the right to claim cost for the expenses incurred for filing the lawsuit for patent infringement in accordance with the provisions laid down in the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, and Civil Manual. The court may allow appropriate costs to the patentee if he/she claims for the same.
Defences available in the lawsuit filed for patent infringement
The Defendant in a lawsuit filed against him/her may take any or more of the following defences:
The patentee has no right to sue for patent infringement.
The allegainstions made by the patentee are false and frivolous in nature.
The invention was used by obtaining prior permission of the patentee or on licence.
The principle of estoppel or res judicata is pleaded.
The claims to be infringed are invalid.
The existence of a restrictive contract is declared unlawful.
The act of infringement is actually within the ambit of innocent infringement or is done when the term of patent has lapsed.
The alleged infringement is not novel or obvious.
Offences and penalties for patent infringement
Section 118:Contravention of secrecy provisions
If any individual does not comply with the provisions mentioned under section 35 or makes or causes an application for grant of a patent against the provisions laid in Section 39, he/she shall be punished with 2 years imprisonment or a fine, at times, both, as stated under Section 118.
Section 119:Falsification of entries in register, etc.
Under Section 119 of the Patent Act, 1970, if any individual makes a false entry in the register and tenders or produces such entries, then he/she shall be liable to 2 years imprisonment or a fine, at times, both.
Section 120:Unauthorised claim of patent rights
Under Section 120, if there is any unauthorised claim of patent rights, there is a penalty of a fine of up to 1 lakh rupees.
Section 121:Wrongful use of words ‘patent office’
Under Section 121, an individual may face a 6 months imprisonment or fine, at times, both, if he/she wrongfully uses on his place of business or any documentation thereof the words ‘patent office’ or any such words that would mislead someone to believe that his place of business is or is officially connected to the patent office.
Section 122:Refusal or failure to give information
Under Section 122, if an individual denies or fails to supply the requisite information as required under Section 100(5) and Section 146 regarding working of patent, he/she shall be punishable with a fine that could extend to 10 lakh rupees.
Section 123:Practice by non-registered patent agents
Under Section 123, if any individual does not comply with the provisions laid down under Section 129, he/she shall be punishable with fine that may extend to 1 lakh rupees in case the offence is carried on for the first time. Further, the fine will be up to 5 lakh rupees in case of a second or subsequent offence.
Section 124:Offences by companies
Under Section 124, is applicable to companies, corporate bodies or any organisations that may commit an offence under the provisions laid down in the Patent Act, 1970. Basically, this Section ensures that legal entities as well as individuals (director, manager, secretary or other officer of the company) are held responsible for their actions.
To grant exclusive privilege to have ownership, use or sell the patented method or product for a limited time period; and
To stimulate new inventions of commercial utility.
The Court further stated that patents are granted only for inventions that are new and useful. They must have novelty and utility. It also must be the discovery of the inventor itself.
What are geographical indications: a brief overview
GI is a sign that is used on goods that carry a special geographical origin and possess qualities, reputation or features that are essentially attributable to that place of origin. Generally, a GI includes the name of the place of origin of the goods. Before the commencement of the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, there was no law as such that safeguarded any agricultural goods, natural goods, handicrafts, manufactured goods, foodstuffs, etc. in order to protect GIs, especially as India had ratified the TRIPS (Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights), under which, until and unless a GI is protected in the country it was originated, there can be no obligations on other countries of TRIPS to extend such reciprocal protection.
Definition of geographical indications
As per Section 2(e) of the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, ‘geographical indication’ in relation to goods, means “an indication which identifies such goods as agricultural goods, natural goods or manufactured goods as originating, or manufactured in the territory of a country, or a region or locality in that territory, where a given quality, reputation or other characteristic of such goods is essentially attributable to its geographical origin and in the case where such goods are manufactured goods one of the activities of either the production or of processing or preparation of the goods concerned takes place in such territory, region or locality, as the case may be.”
The simple explanation of this will be any name that is not the name of a country, region or say, a locality of that particular country shall also be regarded as the geographical indication if it relates to a specific geographical area and is used on or in relation to particular goods that originated from that country, region or locality as the case may be.
Who is a producer when it comes to GIs
A ‘producer’ includes-
Any individual who manufactures goods when it comes to agricultural goods, including the individual who processes or packages such goods;
Any individual who exploits the goods, in case of natural goods;
Any individual who makes or manufactures handicraft or industrial goods;
Any individual who trades or deals in the production, exploitation, making or manufacturing of goods.
Examples of unique geographical indicators in India
Some examples of geographical indicators (GI tags) are as follows:
Products
Category
State/Union Territory
Rasagola
Foodstuff
Odisha
Paithani Saree and Fabrics
Handicraft
Maharashtra
Vazhakkulam Pineapple (now merged With Application No. 130)
Agricultural
Kerala
Feni
Manufactured
Goa
Nashik Valley Wine
Manufactured
Maharashtra
Surat Zari Craft
Handicraft
Gujarat
Santipur Saree
Handicraft
West Bengal
Puneri Pagadi
Handicraft
Maharashtra
Bydagi Chilli (or Bedgi Mirch)
Agricultural
Karnataka
Gadwal Sarees
Gadwal Sarees
Gadwal Sarees
Bikaneri Bhujia
Foodstuff
Rajasthan
Lucknow Zardozi
Handicraft
Uttar Pradesh
Hyderabad Haleem
Foodstuff
Telangana
Berhampur Phoda Kumbha Saree & Joda
Textile
Odisha
Kaipad rice
Agricultural
Kerala
Moirang Phee
Textile
Manipur
Arunachal orange
Agricultural
Arunachal Pradesh
Kullu shawl (logo)
Textile
Himachal Pradesh
Leather toys in Indore
Handicraft
Madhya Pradesh
Ratlami sev
Foodstuff
Madhya Pradesh
Kolhapur lemon
Agricultural
Maharashtra
Waigaon turmeric
Agricultural
Maharashtra
Kolhapur jaggery
Agricultural
Maharashtra
Screw Pine Craft of Kerala (Logo)
Handicraft
Kerala
Shahi Litchi
Agricultural
Bihar
Some basics to know on geographical indications
Can GIs only be used for agricultural products
The use of GIs are not limited to agricultural products per se. As per the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 (or Indian law), the protection to GI is not only limited to handicrafts and agricultural goods but also extends to manufacturing goods. Further, GIs may also shed light on the qualities of a product that are due to human factors associated with the place of origin of the products, like some special manufacturing skills and traditions. One must note that the place of origin could be a village, a town, a region or even a country. So, to answer the above question, no, GI is not limited to agricultural products and extends to food products, handicrafts, etc.
Why do geographical indication need protection
Usually, GIs are recognised by consumers to denote the origin and quality of products. Say, Alphonso mango (or Hapus Amba) from Ratnagiri. A lot of these products have acquired valuable reputations, which, if not protected properly, may lead to misrepresentation or dishonest commercial operations. False use of GIs by parties that are not entitled to get them may be detrimental to consumers and legitimate producers. Here, consumers are misled into believing that they are getting a genuine product, whereas the truth is that they are being deceived into believing the same and are getting an imitation. In such a scenario, legitimate producers are deprived of valuable business and the established reputation of their product is damaged.
What are the key differences between GIs and trademark
Basically, a trademark can be said to be a sign that is used by an individual to distinguish its goods and services from those of other individuals. It provides the owner with the right to exclude others from using its trademark. Further, a trademark will most often than not consist of a fancy name or device.
On the other hand, a GI tells consumers that a product manufactured in a certain place has some features that are linked to that place of production. A GI may be used by producers who make their product in that particular location designated by a GI and whose products share specified qualities.
As opposed to a trademark, the name used as a GI is generally predetermined by the name of the place where it was produced. Some instances of GIs in relation to this pointer are:
Kashmir Pashmina from Jammu & Kashmir,
Darjeeling tea from West Bengal,
Nagpur Orange & Paithani Saree and Fabrics from Maharashtra,
Kanjeepuram sarees and Nilgiri tea from Tamil Nadu, etc.
Characteristics/features of geographical indications
The main purpose of getting a GI is to exclude unauthorised individuals from misusing GIs. Registering GIs in turn will protect consumers from deception, add to the economic growth and development of the producers of such products and further promote goods bearing Indian geographical indications in the export market.
GI and rural economy
Generally, a lot of GIs come from villages and small towns. Once these GIs are protected, it can result in higher income for the producers that reside in such regions, which in turn, has the potential to transform the rural economy for the better. It will also attract investments by investors in such markets. The general features of GI include:
It gives legal protection to GIs in India.
It prevents unauthorised usage by others when it comes to registered GIs.
It gives legal protection to Indian GIs, which in turn will help increase the number of exports.
It promotes economic prosperity of producers of goods that are produced in a geographical territory.
The category-specific features of GI are as follows:
GI and industry
A lot of registered and potential GIs in India belong to the MSME sector (Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises). A GI protection for them would ensure that the market there develops and has increased returns.
GI and tourism
GIs are unique products that come from demarcated areas. So, cultivation or the manufacturing process within itself, attracts tourists. Also, handicrafts and handlooms that have special features will always attract tourists. Further, regions can attract tourists to taste the special GI foods or drinks or buy such unique products with added discounts or at a discounted price.
Types of geographical indications
GI tags are used in the following type of products:
Handicrafts
Some instances of handicrafts would be:
Madhubani painting from the Mithila region of India and Nepal.
Mysore silk originates from the city of Mysore in the state of Karnataka.
Foodstuff products
Some instances of foodstuff products would be:
Tirupati Laddus registered by Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams.
The GI granted to both West Bengal and Orissa for Rasagola.
Wine and drinks
Some instances of wine and drinks would be:
Champagne, Cognac of France;
Scotch Whisky of UK;
Tequila of Mexico.
Agricultural products
An instance of agricultural products would be Basmati rice.
Industrial products
Well, no instance can be found online but it is one important type of GI.
Ownership of geographical indications
The term ‘ownership’ in GI is referred to as ‘producer’. The following individuals who deal with these 3 categories of goods come under the term ‘producer’:
Agricultural goods include production, processing, trading or dealing.
Natural goods include exploiting, trading or dealing.
Handicrafts or industrial goods include making, manufacturing, trading or dealing.
Term of geographical indications
The registration of an authorised user will be for a period of 10 years or for the period till the date on which the registration of the GI in respect of which the authorised user is registered expires, whichever is earlier.
Registration of geographical indications
Let us understand this in FAQs format.
Is registration of a GI compulsory
Section 8 of the Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999, talks about registration with respect to particular goods and areas. As per this Section, there is no mandate to register a GI. However, registering a GI will have the following benefits:
Registration offers better legal protection to facilitate an action for infringement.
The registered proprietors have the right to initiate an infringement action.
The authorised proprietor can exercise the exclusive right to use the GI.
How to apply to register a particular GI
To register a GI, the producer has to follow this procedure:
Fill in an application for registration of a GI Authorised User. It must be in the prescribed form (GI-3A).
Please note:To access the forms, kindly follow this link.
The form must be accompanied by a prescribed fee of ₹500/- for filling a GI Authorised User Application.
The statement of case must be accompanied by an affidavit.
Further, a copy of the consent letter from the registered proprietor or in case the consent letter is not available, a copy of application may be endorsed to the registered proprietor for information.
The requisite fees may be paid through cash or money orders, bank drafts or cheques.
The same has to be addressed to the Registrar of Geographical Indications, payable at Chennai.
Who can use the registered GI
An authorised user, i.e., the proprietor, has the exclusive right to use the GIs in relation to goods with respect to its registration.
Can a registered GI be renewed
Yes, a registered GI can be renewed from time to time for a period of 10 years each. The producer has to make an application within the prescribed time limit and pay the requisite
amount of fees for renewal.
What is the effect if a GI is not renewed
If a GI is not renewed from time to time, the registrar sends a notice for renewal (this includes the date of expiration, the conditions, the requisite amount of fees, etc.) and even then if the producer does not want to renew the GI, the Registrar may remove the GI or the authorised user from the register.
Can a registered GI, a registered authorised user or a registered producer be removed from the Register
The Appellate Board or the Registrar of Geographical Indications has the authority to remove the GI or an authorised user from the register. Furthermore, an application by an aggrieved person can be made.
Can register GI be assigned, transmitted, etc.
No, a Gi is a public property that belongs to the producers of the concerned gods. It cannot be assigned, transmitted, licensed, pledged, mortgaged or have any such agreements. However, when the authorised user or producer dies, the right to that GI will be delegated to the successor in title.
Infringement of geographical indications
Let us understand this pointer in FAQs form.
When will one claim that a registered GI was infringed?
When any user who does not have the authority to use the GI (commonly known as an ‘unauthorised user’) makes use of a GI that indicates or suggests that such goods originate in a geographical area other than at the that very place where it originated at the first place and when that GI misleads the public into believing that the geographical origin of that good was in the other location.
When any such usage of GI results in an unfair competition including passing off with respect to registered GIs.
When the use of another GI results in false representation to the public that goods originate in a territory with respect to which a registered geographical indication relates.
Who can initiate an infringement action
Any registered proprietor or authorised user of a registered GI can initiate an infringement action.
Landmark cases one must know related to geographical indications
Mentionriceelow are some landmark cases on GIs in India.
The famous case of Navara rice: Tamil Nadu vs. Kerala
Navara Rice is one of the types of rice found in India and is quite a unique grain plant in the Oryza group. It originated in Kerala and is famous for the medical properties it holds. In 2007, this product received GI protection and was licenced to Navara Rice Farmers’ Society, which caused a rise in the number of growers of this crop. However, it was mentioned that only those farmers who belong to the same society have the right to sell their produce of this variety of rice.
Now as per an NGO based in Kerala, nobody has any evidence on the historical origin of this variety of rice. Additionally, one cannot grant GI on seeds because with migration, there is a chance that seeds also migrate and adapt to the local ecology with genetic changes. This is why there is a need for more clarity on GI laws.
The famous Kolhapuri chappals
In 2019, the GI tag was granted to the ethnic leather chappals, commonly known as Kolhapuri chappals, by the CGPDTM (Controller General of Patents, Designs, and Trade Marks). This tag was granted to several districts of Maharashtra (namely Kolhapur, Sangli, Solapur and Satara) and Karnataka (namely Belgaum, Dharwad, Bagalkot and Bijapur). There was a joint bid for GI tag of Kolhapuri Chappals by the Sant Rohidas Leather Industries & Charmakar Development Corporation Limited of Maharashtra (LIDCOM) and the Dr. Babu Jagjeevan Ram Leather Industries Development Corporation of Karnataka (LIDKAR) in 2009, which fructified in 2018 into the GI tag being granted in favour of the artisans of the two states.
Well, the main objective behind this GI tag being granted to 2 states and 8 districts was because there was a large demand for Kolhapuris and a decline in supply of leather in the state of Maharashtra. Another issue was the change of fashion and taste among the youth of India and across the globe. Additionally, there was also a rise in competition and the most proverbial threat was that of ‘Chinese imitation’.
Tirupati Laddu:the savoury from Andhra Pradesh’
Under Class 30, Tirupati Laddus applied for registration of GI by the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam and they received GI tag in 2009. This laddu is offered as ‘naivedyam’ to Tirupati Balaji and then offered as ‘prasadam’ to the devotees after they have worshipped Lord Venkateshwara, the presiding deity at SriVari Temple in Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh.
However, in the same year as GI tag was granted to these laddus, a PIL was filed in the Madras HIgh Court against this GI tag. The same was filed by Mr. R.S. Parveen Raj, who was a resident of Trivandrum. His suit was filed on the following 3 grounds:
GI was granted to a single producer.
There is a lack of distinctiveness.
The name of the laddus were quite generic in nature.
The Court dismissed the petition on the grounds that an alternative and efficacious forum was available for adjudication of such a dispute. Under the G.I. Act, such a petition could have been filed either before the G.I. Registry or the IPAB (Intellectual Property Appellate Board).
The recent Mithila Makhana GI tag
Mithila Makhana, an aquatic fox nut grown in the area of Mithila region in Bihar and its neighbour Nepal. The name was registered as a GI tag in the name of Mithilanchal Makhana Utpadak Sangh. After this tag, no unauthorised user or company can benefit or incur profit on the same name as this. This was done to help improve exports in the market. Further, the growers of this nut will mainly be benefited from the tag and will earn more profits, eventually leading to a better lifestyle of the farmers and growers of this variety of nuts residing in that location.
Designs
What are designs: a brief overview
Please note: Before we dive deep into this part, designs are also known as industrial designs and the rights granted to the registered proprietor of that design are known as ‘design rights’ or ‘design patent’.
Basically, design can be said to be a type of intellectual property that protects any composition, be it two or three dimensional lines, patterns, shapes or colours. The present Designs Act, 2000, has been replaced by the Designs Act, 1911, that prevailed in British India. Since the enactment of the 1911 Act, a significant amount of progress has been made in the field of science and technology and with such development there was a need to provide more effective protection to registered devices, which is when the 2000 Act came into enactment. This Act also intended to ensure that the law does not unnecessarily extend protection beyond what is needed to create the required incentive for Designs Activity while removing impediments to the free usage of available designs.
Definition of designs
Under Section 2 (d) of the Designs Act, 2000, the term ‘design’ can be referred to only the-
Features of shape,
Configuration,
Pattern,
Ornament,
Composition of lines, colour or combination
thereof applied to any article, be it two or three dimensional or in both forms, by any industrial process or means, whether manual, mechanical or chemical, separate or combined, which in the finished article appeal to and are judged solely by the eye, but does not include any mode, principle, construction or anything which is in substance a mere mechanical device, and does not include any trade mark, as defined in clause (v) of sub-section of Section 2 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958, property mark or artistic works as defined under Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957.
Examples of Indian designs
Some of the well known instances of industrial design are as follows:
The Piaggio ‘Vespa’ Scooter,
The ‘Contour’ bottle by Coca Cola,
The Volkswagen ‘Beetle’,
The Apple iMac,
The Dyson Dual Cyclone Vacuum Cleaner.
Characteristics/features of designs
The following are some of the main features of designs:
It grants the proprietor exclusive rights over the new and original design.
It acts as an asset for the proprietor or the owner of the design.
It can help the proprietor initiate a legal proceeding in case of infringement by a third party.
It serves as prima facie evidence when it comes to filing a lawsuit for design infringement.
It gives the proprietor the right to sell, transfer and licence the design with ease.
Types of designs
There is no classification of types of design under Indian law.
Ownership of designs
The ownership of the designs vests with the proprietor or owner of the design under the Design Act, 2000.
Rights of proprietor
Under this Act, the proprietor or owner has the following rights:
Copyright in the design
Under Section 11 of the Act, once the design is registered, the proprietor has copyright over that design. Here, copyright can be defined as the exclusive rights to apply a design to any article in any class where the design is registered.
Duration of copyright in design
Once the proprietor files for registration and the same is approved, the inventor behind inventing a design has the copyright for 10 years,after this, he/she can increase it for another 5 years provided a request is made to the Controller along with the requisite fees.
Transfer of rights
The rights in the design are capable of being transferred through assignment or transmission including via mortgaging and licensing either through contracts or by the operation of law that has to be noted (mandatory) to the Controller General.
Piracy of design
Once the design is registered, it is protected from any copying or substantial copying of a design for commercial purposes by a third party. Such an infringement will be regarded as piracy. Simply put, when any design is copied without obtaining a prior written consent of the owner, it is regarded as infringement of that design. The owner of the proprietor has all the rights (and monopoly) over that design and in case of infringement, the infringer is liable to compensate the owner for such an act.
Term of designs
The duration of a registered design is 10 years from the date of registration, initially, i.e., after its registration, but in cases where claim to priority has been permitted, the duration can be 10 years from the priority date. This period can be further extended for 5 years with an application made in Form 3 accompanied by the requisite amount of fees to the Controller before the expiry of the said initial period of 10 years. The proprietor of a design may make an application for such extension even as soon as the design is registered.
What are the essential requirements for registration under the Design Act, 2000
There are about 8 essential necessary for successfully registering a design, they are as follows:
Novelty
The design has to be novel and unique in nature.
Judgement
The design must be judged solely on the basis of its features (through the eyes-visual representation). Simply put, the features must be visible.
Disclosures
The design must not be disclosed to the public in India or anywhere across the world by prior publication or by prior use or in any other manner.
Distinguishability
It must have significant difference from designs or their combination thereof that are already registered or pre-existing or disclosed to the public.
Public morality
To register the design, there must not be any scandalous or obscene content.
Application
The design has to be applied to an article by an industrial process.
Functionality
It should not have any feature that is purely functional.
Copyright
It must not, in any way, consist of any trademark or property mark or artistic work as defined under the Copyright Act, 1957.
What is the process of registration for a design under the Design Act, 2000
Briefly, the process of registering a design consists of the following steps:
Submitting the application.
acceptance/objections/refusal.
Removal of objecion/making an appeal to the Central Government.
Design of Central Government.
Registration of the design.
Let us understand each of these steps in brief.
Submission of application
The proprietor or the individual who holds the design has to file an application for registering the design. As per Section 5(1) of the Designs Act, 2000, the Controller will register the design if the following requisites are met:
The design must be new and original.
The individual who is claiming that a particular design belongs to him/her, the same must not be published in any country.
It must not be against any public order or morality.
The application has to be followed by a prescribed fee, prescribed form and in the prescribed manner.
Designs to be filed along with the application
The application under Section 5 of the application must be accompanied by 4 copies of the representation of the design and the application must mention the Class under which the design has to be registered. The applicant has to also file a brief statement of novelty with the application.
Please note: As per the Designs Act, 2000, there is a type for registration of design known as Locarno Classification (which is followed in a lot of jurisdictions, including India). It consists of 32 classes, numbered 1 to 31 and an additional Class 99 to include articles that do not fall under the above 31 classes. Most of these classes are further divided into subclasses. It is pertinent that design applications must be filed in a particular class depending upon the predominant material with which the article is made or is capable of being made.
According to the Locarno Classification system the Designs Register is divided into 32 classes. The application for design has to be filed in a particular class to obtain protection in that class. The list of class is as follows:
List of class under the Locarno Classification
CLASS 1
It includes foodstuffs.
CLASS 2
It includes articles of clothing and haberdashery.
CLASS 3
It includes travel goods, cases, parasols and personal belongings, not elsewhere specified.
CLASS 4
It includes brushware.
CLASS 5
It includes textile piecegoods, artificial and natural sheet material.
CLASS 6
It includes furnishing.
CLASS 7
It includes household goods, not elsewhere specified.
CLASS 8
It includes tools and hardware.
CLASS 9
It includes packages and containers for the transport or handling of goods.
CLASS 10
It includes clocks and watches and other measuring instruments, checking and signalling instruments.
CLASS 11
It includes articles of adornment.
CLASS 12
It includes means of transport or hoisting.
CLASS 13
It includes equipment for production, distribution or transformation of electricity.
CLASS 14
It includes recording, communication or information retrieval equipment.
CLASS 15
It includes machines, not elsewhere specified.
CLASS 16
It includes photographic, cinematographic and optical apparatus.
CLASS 17
It includes musical instruments.
CLASS 18
It includes printing and office machinery.
CLASS 19
It includes stationary and office equipment, artists’ and teaching materials.
CLASS 20
It includes sales and advertising equipment, signs.
CLASS 21
It includes games, toys, tents and sports goods.
CLASS 22
It includes arms, pyrotechnic articles, articles for hunting, fishing and pest killing.
CLASS 23
It includes fluid distribution equipment, sanitary, heating, ventilation and air-conditioning equipment,
CLASS 24
It includes medical and laboratory equipment.
CLASS 25
It includes building units and construction elements.
CLASS 26
It includes lighting apparatus.
CLASS 27
It includes tobacco and smokers’ supplies.
CLASS 28
It includes pharmaceutical and cosmetic products, toilet articles and apparatus.
CLASS 29
It includes devices and equipment against fire hazards, for accident prevention and for rescue.
CLASS 30
It includes articles for the care and handling of animals.
CLASS 31
It includes machines and appliances for preparing food or drink, not elsewhere specified.
CLASS 99
It includes miscellaneous.
Acceptance or objection of the application
On considering the application, if the Controller is of the opinion that the applicant fulfils all the prescribed requirements, he/she shall register the design.further, in case while considering the application there are any objections to appear in front of the Controller, a statement consisting of all such objections will be forwarded to the applicant or his/her agent.
Removal of objection/ making an appeal to the Central Government
Once the applicant or his/her agent receives the statement, the objection has to be removed within 1 month from the date of communication of the objections. Failing to do so shall be deemed to have the effect of the application being withdrawn. The ap;licant may also apply to the Controller to hear the matter. In case the Controller does not accept the application after the submission, the applicant may make an appeal directly to the Central Government. The decision taken by the /central Government will be final.
Decision of the Central Government
As mentioned above, the decision taken by the Central Government will be final.
Publication of particulars of registered designs
Once the design is accepted, the Controller will direct the registration and publication of the particulars of the application and the representation of the article to which the design has been applied, in the official Gazette. While publishing the design in the Gazette, the controller may select one or more views of the representation of the design, which in his opinion would depict the design in the best possible manner.
Register of designs
When the design is finally accepted, it shall be entered in the Register of Design, with all the important information as mandated by the Act. the important information, inter alia, may include the following information:
The number of the design,
The Class under which such a design is registered,
The date when the application was filed for registering in India,
The reciprocatory date (if any),
Claim for registration, etc.
Cancellation of registration
The registration of a design can be cancelled at any time after the design has been registered if there is a petition for cancellation in Form 8 with the prescribed amount of fee addressed to the Controller of Designs for these reasons:
The design has been registered before in India.
The design has been published in India or anywhere before the date of registration.
The design is not new or original.
The design is not registerable.
It is not a design per se under Section 2(d).
Infringement/piracy of designs
Generally, the term ‘piracy of a design’ is used to address infringement of copyright. The same has been mentioned under Section 22 of the Designs Act, 2000. Let us read some FAQs on piracy of designs.
What is piracy of a design
Basically, piracy of a design means the application of a design or its imitation to any article that belongs to any class (discussed above) of articles where the design has been registered for selling or importing these articles without obtaining a prior consent in written format from the registered proprietor. Publishing such registered articles or exposing the terms of that sale with knowledge of the unauthorised application of the design to them will also amount to piracy of the design.
What is the punishment for piracy of a registered design
If any individual contravenes any copyrighted design, he/she will be liable for every offence and may be asked to pay a fine not exceeding ₹25,000/- to the registered proprietor, subject to a maximum of ₹50,000/- recoverable as contract debt in respect of any one design. The registered proprietor has the right to file a lawsuit for recovery of the damages thus caused by any such contravention and for injunction against repetition of the same.
Please note: The total sum to be recoverable shall not go beyond ₹50,000/- as recoverable as contract debt in respect of any one design.
The lawsuit for infringement (or piracy), recovery of damage, etc., must be filed in any court below the court of the District Judge.
Defences that can be used by the Defendant in case of infringement/piracy lawsuit
If a Defendant is charged with design infringement or piracy suit, he/she can refer to the following defences:
Cancellation
In case the design is cancelled as per the provision mentioned in then Act, the Defendant can claim the same and use it as a defence.
Expiry
As mentioned above, the copyright on a particular design is available for a limited time period. If the Defendant can provide evidence that the design has surpassed the time period (for which it was predicted) as mentioned under provisions of the Act, he/she may be allowed to make use of the design.
Unreasonable delay
If there is an unreasonable delay on the part of the Plaintiff to file the lawsuit, the Defendant has the power to plead acquiescence and on the basis of this pleading, may be allowed to use the design.
No right to sue
If the Defendant provides evidence that the Plaintiff is not the registered proprietor of the copyrighted (or the duly authorised agent or licensee) of that particular design, he/she may be permitted to make use of the design.
Design not new or original
The Defendant can claim that the design in question is neither new nor original.
Design was previously registered
The Defendant can state that his design was previously registered in India, if that is the case.
Prior publication
The Defendant may raise a defence of his design was published in India before the date of registration.
Conduct of Plaintiff
The Defendant can claim that the Plaintiff has not approached the court with clean hands and that his/her conduct is tainted.
Landmark cases one must know related to designs
Design and not article
Section 2(a) of the Designs Act, 2000, defines the term ‘article’ as any article of manufacture and any substance, artificalor partly artifical and partly natural and includes any part of an article that is capable of being made and sold separately. However, one must note that there is a difference between article and design. In the case of Rotela Auto Components (P) Ltd. And Anr. vs. Jaspal Singh And Ors. 95 (2002) DLT 830, the Delhi High Court held that design means the features that form the conception or idea of a shape.
In yet another case- Marico Limited A Company Registered vs. Raj Oil Mills Limited A Company 2008 (37) PTC 109, there were some caps of bottles that were manufactured separately but were used for the same bottles manufactured by the same manufacturer. However, the nature of the cap was such that there was a possibility that the same could be sold separately, though not currently done by the manufacturer. Here, the Bombay High Court held that the caps are entitled to be registered as a separate item of commerce.
Registration
In the case of Texla Metals & Plastics Pvt. Ltd. vs. Anil K. Bhasin And Ors. 2001 PTC 146 (Del.), the Delhi High Court held that the concept of a new or an original type of design is relatable to the publication of such a design or its availability to the public in India. The Court further stated that if the contention is that the Defendant has received brochures from several nations like Malaysia, Korea, and Japan with respect to such goods, the mere receipt of such brochures will not be said to be the publication of such designs within India.
In yet another case, Ampro Food Products vs. Ashoka Biscuit Works And Ors. AIR 1973 AP 17, the Appellant and Respondent manufactured biscuits. The design of the Appellant was registered. The design of the Respondent also had an identical design embossed on the biscuit, the only difference being that instead of ‘AP’ (which was embossed on the biscuits of the Appellant), letters ‘AP’ was embossed on the biscuits of the Respondent. Aggrieved by the mark, the Appellant filed a lawsuit for injunction, stating that the Respondent had committed piracy of his design. The Andhra High Court issued a temporary injunction based on the registered design.
Test for infringement
In the case of Faber-Castell vs. Pikpen Private Limited 2003 (27) PTC538 (BOM), the Bombay High Court held that in an infringement suit it must be found at the outset that, judged solely by the eye, there is an indispensable similarity in the two designs.
Remedies for infringement
In Micolube India vs. Rakesh Kumar 2012 (50) PTC 161, the Delhi High Court held that the passing off action is not available when it comes to registered design. Thus, the parties are relegated to the remedy under the Designs Act to seek cancellation of registration and other remedies under the Act.
Trade secrets
What are trade secrets: a brief overview
A trade secret is any practice or process of a company that is usually not known (to the general public) outside of the company. Such information gives the company a competitive edge over its competitors and is often a product of internal research and development. The essentials of a trade secret are as follows:
It must have a commercial value.
It is known to a limited group of people.
The owner of such a secret has taken reasonable steps to keep such information secret.
Definition of trade secrets
There is no explicit law that governs the protection of trade secrets in India. However, these rights are enforced through contract law (the Indian Contract Act, 1872), principles of equity or by way of a common law action for breach of confidence. In the case of Tata Motors Limited & Anr vs State Of West Bengal & Ors. (GA No. 3876 of 2008 in WP No. 1773 of 2008), the Calcutta High Court, relying on the definition for ‘trade secret’ in Black’s Law Dictionary, observed that a trade secret is a formula, process, device or other business information that is kept a secret (confidential) to maintain an advantage over competitors. The information will consist mainly of:
A formula,
A pattern,
A commercial information,
A programme,
A device,
Any method,
Any technique or
A process
that deevies any independent financial value, actual or potential, from not being generally known or disclosed to the public or readily ascertainable by those individuals or companies who can benefit (financially) from its disclosure or use and that a reasonable attempt is made to maintain secrecy when it comes to the product.
Examples of trade secrets
Some of the examples of trade secrets well known in India are as follows:
Google’s search algorithm (is constantly being modified to prevent third parties from hacking into the system and being shown on the top while being searched.
The Coke Syrup Formula by Coca-Cola (a secret since 1981 and not a registered trademark, for they (the company) will have to disclose the information to the patent office).
Interesting fact: In 2006, some individuals tried to share the formula of Coca Cola with one of its biggest competitors, Pepsi; however, Pepsi informed Coca-Cola about the incident).
KFC’s original recipe (kept a secret by Colonel Sanders and then a few others by signing a confidentiality agreement beforehand).
The Big Mac Special Sauce by McDonald’s.
Characteristics/features of trade secrets
The most common characteristic of a trade secret are as follows:
They are not public information.
Their secrecy provides a monetary benefit to the holder.
Attempts are made to actively protect such secrecy.
Types of trade secrets
There are several types of trade secrets, namely:
Business,
Financial,
Scientific,
Technical,
Engineering,
Economical.
Basics of trade secrets
Let us understand this pointer with the help of some FAQs.
What are the rights granted for a protected trade secret
Generally, when a trade secret is deemed to be protected, the owners have the right to preclude the information that was obtained in a lawful manner under their control from being disclosed, acquired or used by other individuals without obtaining their prior consent. Some unfair practices in this regard include:
Industrial or commercial espionage,
Breach of contract,
Breach of confidence and
Inducement of breach.
It also includes the usage or disclosure of any trade secret by a third party who was aware or was negligently failing to know that these practices were involved in the acquisition of the confidential information. However, one must note that the use of trade secrets by an individual who gained the information through a legitimate business transaction without negligence is not regarded as illegal. For instance, a competitor may buy a product, look at the construction and composition of the commodity and extract the secret knowledge embedded in the product (so called reverse engineering), which will not be regarded as a violation of trade secrets.
How is trade secret law governed in India
Generally, trade secrets in India are governed by common law, namely:
Contract law
Under Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, parties cannot disclose information that is against the terms of the contract between the parties, i.e., non disclosure agreements.
Trade secrets are property rights that can be assigned and licenced to other individuals. The individual or organisation that holds the trade secret also has the authority to permit third parties to access and use the trade secret information. Yet, considering the secret nature of the trade secret, it is not always easy for others to ascertain if the information concerned meets the requirement for trade secret protection. Thus, in comparison to patents, it is a little more tough to transfer and licence such secretive information and to resolve arguments or disputes that may thus arise. Further, since a potential licensee will necessarily have to have access to trade secret information to ascertain several factors, like-
The value of the secret,
The utility of the secret, etc.,
It is important that a non disclosure agreement be signed between both parties (i.e., the licensor and the licensee). Furthermore, in order to keep the trade secret really a secret, the licensor of the trade secret must take reasonable steps to keep the information confidential.
Ownership of trade secrets
In order for a proprietor to get his/her rights over a trade secret, he/she has to furnish the nature of the information that he/she believes to be a trade secret and how it came into his/her possession. If such information is not made available, the court may deny to grant such a right, as held in the case of Ambiance India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Shri Naveen Jain 122 (2005) DLT 421. Basically, there is a distinction between general knowledge regarding business of an organisation or the general skill and expertise of employees accumulated in the course of employment in an organisation and trade secrets that can be protected. Thus, it is crucial that the proprietors mention the information that may consist of a trade secret. In some instances, there is a chance that the trade secret information may include works that were created and developed by the proprietor and could be granted protection. Here, the principles of authorship and ownership applicable to copyright will be applicable. However, in some cases, the trade secret information has to be shown by the proprietor to prove that he/she is the rightful owner of such a title. In other words, if the information is derived or created by an individual with the information readily avoidable in public, such information will not be regarded as a trade secret and no protection will actually be granted to such an owner.
Term of trade secrets
As we know, there is no specific law that governs trade secrets in India, so there is no durationper se for the protection of trade secrets. In simple words, unlike other types of IPs, that usually have limited duration, trade secrets are protected for an indefinite time period. Further, a trade secret can be protected for an unlimited period of time, until and unless it is discovered or legally acquired by some other individual or organisation or disclosed to the public.
Registration of trade secrets
As opposed to other forms of IPS, trade secrets are protected without registration, i.e., trade secrets do not need procedural formalities to be followed to be protected.
Infringement of trade secrets
Please note: Infringement of trade secrets is also known as ‘misappropriation’. There is no explicit law that defines the term ‘misappropriation’; however, when a trade secret is delivered by improper means (arising from civil, including breach of contract or tortuous wrongs or criminal acts), it would be regarded as misappropriation of trade secrets.
There is no specific law for trade secret misappropriation; yet, offences like criminal breach of trust, theft or cheating may be applicable in cases where a trade secret is infringed.
Penalty for infringement of trade secret or misappropriation
The punishment for criminal breach if trust is imprisonment for up to 3 years or a fine. One can say that a criminal breach of contract was committed when an individual dishonestly misappropriated or converted for his/her own usage any property that has been entrusted to him/her, or dishonesty uses or sells (or disposes) aby such property and breaches the contract (could be expressed or implied, i.e., in written or oral form, respectively), or applicable law, or allows any other individual to do so. An action for such a breach can be brought under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Defences in case of infringement/misappropriation of trade secret
The defences to a large extent rely on the facts of each case, however, these are the most common defences:
Information is already known to the general public (or public domain),
Information that has to be protected is not actually a trade secret) even when it is confidential information),
The information has been disclosed by the Plaintiff through negligence and failure to maintain secrecy.
The Defendant obtained the information through independent study, skill or labour (one can use this defence even in case of reverse engineering) without having access to the Plaintiff’s information.
The Defendant does not have any express or implied obligation to keep the information a secret.
Remedies for infringement
Preliminary/temporary/interim or final injunction
In case of misappropriation or infringement of a trade secret, the owner can seek relief of injunction (could be temporary or permanent), so the Defendant is refrained from using or disclosing the trade secret. The courts have the discretion to grant such a relief and apply the following tests (as mentioned in Gujarat Bottling Co. Ltd. vs. Coca Cola Co. (1995) 5 SCC 545 to ascertain the same:
Whether there is any prima facie case made out by the Plaintiff in the case,
Whether the balance of convenience is in the favour of the Plaintiff, and
Whether the Plaintiff would undergo injury beyond repair in the event that the intention is not granted.
The courts have further held that the main motive for granting an interim injunction is to protect the Plaintiff against injury by violation of its rights, where such an injury cannot be adequately compensated by damages. This statement is especially true for trade secrets whose utility or value is derived from their confidential nature. Thus, the need for such a protection for the Plaintiff must be weighed against any injury that may be caused to the Defendants by being prevented from exercising their legal rights.
Damages
Litigants can also seek damages and rendition of accounts of profit as one of the remedies to trade secret misappropriation or infringement. Damages are further divided into three categories, namely:
Liquidated damages,
Actual damages, and
Punitive damages.
Other civil remedies
Apart from the aforementioned remedies, there are no civil remedies available in cases of wilful trade secret appropriation; however, there are some remedies available to the Plaintiff or the rights holder, including:
Orders granting return of trade secrets or delivery of material that has trade secrets,
Appointing court commissioners to take stock of the materials misappropriated by the Defendant (for assistance in quantifying damages).
The courts may also direct local police to help the court commissioners carry out appropriate search and seizure orders.
Civil remedies
There is no explicit offence of trade secret misappropriation but the infringement or misappropriation may result in a criminal breach of trust, theft or cheating may be applicable. The matters may be governed under the following laws:
It is pertinent to note that there are no specific laws relating to trade secret misappropriation in India, as it is governed totally on the grounds of common law principles (that have evolved through judicial precedents) and Indian contract law.
Landmark cases one must know related to trade secrets
The extent to which the trade secret is known outside business,
The extent to which the information is known to those inside the business, say the employees,
The necessary precautions taken by the holder to guard secrecy,
The saving affected and the value to the holder in having the information as against competitors,
The amount of effort or money spent in getting and developing the information, and
The amount of time and expense it would take others to get and duplicate the information.
Ownership of trade secret
The Delhi High Court, aforementioned above, in the case of Ambiance India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Shri Naveen Jain 122 (2005) DLT 421, held that if the nature of the information that is said to be a trade secret is not revealed, the court has the authority to not grant protection for the trade secret.
In Burlington Home Shopping Pvt. Ltd. vs Rajnish Chibber 1995 (35) DRJ 335, the Defendant was a former employee of the company (which is the Plaintiff in this case), made use of the contacts database collected by the Plaintiff. The Delhi High Court held that the contacts database belonged to the Plaintiff and that it was developed through skill and labour of the Plaintiff.
Plant varieties
What are plant varieties: a brief overview
Plant variety is a type of IPR. Plant variety protection, also known as ‘plant breeder’s right’ is a form of a Plant Breeder’s Rights (PBRs) that provides exclusive rights to a breeder of the registered variety. In India, this form of IPR is protected under the Plant Variety Protection And Farmers Rights (PPVFR) Act, 2001.
Definition of plant varieties
Under Section 2(za), the term ‘variety’ is defined as a “a plant grouping except micro-organism within a single botanical taxon of the lowest known rank, which can be-
(i) defined by the expression of the characteristics resulting from a given genotype of that plant grouping;
(ii) distinguished from any other plant grouping by expression of at least one of the said characteristics; and
(iii) considered as a unit with regard to its suitability for being propagated, which remains unchanged after such propagation,
and includes propagating material of such variety, extant variety, transgenic variety, farmers variety and essentially derived variety.”
Examples of flora finery:India’s plant varieties under protection
Plant varieties have been classified into several categories, let us look at a few examples.
Oilseeds
The following are some of the instances of registered oilseeds in India:
Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University
Cereals
The following are some of the instances of registered cereals in India:
Crop
Name of applicant
Sorghum [CSH-22SS (NSSH-104)]
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)
Pearl millet [JKBH-26 (MH-595)]
JK Agri Genetics Ltd.
Maize [Pratap Hybrid Maize-1 (EH -50802)]
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)
Wheat [WR-544 (Pusa Bold)]
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)
Vegetables
The following are some of the instances of registered vegetables in India:
Crop
Name of applicant
Okra/Lady’s Finger [Kashi Pragati (VRO-6)]
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)
Potato (FL 1867)
Pepsi Co. India Holding Pvt. Ltd.
Cauliflower [Pusa Sharad (Sel-309-1-2)]
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)
Brinjal [Pusa Ankur (DBSR-91)]
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)
Onion (PHULE SAMARTH)
Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth
Tomato (BA-1031)
Nuziveedu Seeds Pvt. Ltd.
Okra/Lady’s Finger [Kashi Pragati (VRO-6)]
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)
Legumes
The following are some of the instances of legumes registered in India:
Crop
Name of applicant
Black Gram [KU-91 (Azad Urd-2)]
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)
Green Gram [Kamadeva (OUM-11-5)]
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)
Field Pea [Kashi Shakti (VR-7)]
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)
Lentil [Pant Lentil-5]
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)
Kidney Bean [Kashi Udai (VR-6)]
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)
Pigeon Pea [TT 401]
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)
Chickpea [Haryana Chana-3 (H-86-18)]
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)
Flowers
The following are some of the instances of registered flowers in India:
Crop
Name of applicant
Rose (Arka Swadesh)
ICAR- Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore
Orchid (Tiew Lyngskaw)
President, Nonglwai Orchid Conservation Society
Carnation [IIHRP 1 (Arka Flame)]
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research
Spices
The following are some of the instances of registered spices in India:
Crop
Name of applicant
Nutmeg (MUNDATHANAM)
Michael Joseph
Turmeric (Varna)
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)
Small Cardamom (PANIKULANGARA GREEN BOLD NO.1)
Joy Peter
Black pepper ( Pepper Thekkan)
T.T. Thomas
Fenugreek (Jatni)
Ashok Mehta
Ginger (Aadi-LO)
Dhaneshwar Mahto
Coriander (Pal Dhaniya)
Udesi Pal
Turmeric (Surkha)
Surendra Kumar
Fruits
The following are some of the instances of registered fruits in India:
Crop
Name of applicant
Apricot (GYALCHIMA TILI)
Tsering Angmo
Grapes (Sarita Purple Seedless)
Dattatraya Nanasaheb Kale
Walnut (CITH-W-1)
Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Central Institute of Temperate Horticulture
Pomegranate (Bhagawa)
Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth
Guava (VNR BIHI)
VNR Seeds Pvt. Ltd.
Mango (DESHI GOLA)
Puttilal
Mulberry (Sahana)
Central Silk Board
Characteristics/features of plant varieties
The following are some of the characteristics of plant varieties:
It is distinctive in nature (i.e., it has to be different either in colour, form, size, etc.)
It is of homogenous nature (i.e., homogeneous in characteristic when it comes to height, leaf and stem colour, flower size and shape, flowering fate, etc.)
The characteristics of such a plant variety must be constant over time (for instance, if the variety of flowers flowered at 120 days after being planted, the next year flowering should also take place in the same time range).
Types of plant varieties
Under the PPVFR Act, 2001, there are 18 plant species that can be registered under the Act, they are as follows:
Cereals
They include:
Rice,
Wheat,
Maize,
Sorghum,
Pearl millet.
Legumes
Thy include:
Chickpea,
Mungbean,
Urdbean,
Field pea,
Rajmash,
Lentil,
Pigeon pea.
Fibre crop
They include:
Four species of cotton namely:
Gossypium arboreum L. and G;
herbaceum L. (iploid cotton);
G. barbadense L. and G;
hirsutum (Tetraploid cotton).
Two species of Jute, namely:
Corchorus olitorius L. and C.
Capsularis L.
Ownership of plant varieties
The PPV&FR Act, 2001, grants proprietary ownership to plant breeders and farmers for their varieties. Once the protection is granted, the owners have the exclusive rights to-
Produce,
Sell,
Market,
Distribute,
Import or
Export
the variety registered under the Act.
Term of plant varieties
Every variety of plant has a different term of protection, let us take a look at each of them:
Trees and vines
In case of trees and vines, the duration of protection is 18 years from the date of registration of that variety.
Extant varieties
In case of extant varieties, the duration of protection is 15 years from the date of registration of that variety.
Other crops
In case of other crops, the duration of protection is 15 years from the date of registration of that variety.
Registration of plant varieties
Let us understand this pointer with the help of some FAQs.
What is the criteria for protecting a plant variety
In order to be eligible for protecting a plant variety, it must have the following features:
Distinct
To be registered, a plant variety has to be clearly distinguishable by at least one essential characteristic from any existing or commonly known varieties in any country while the application for registration is being filed.
Uniform
A variety has to be sufficiently uniform in its essential characteristics.
Stable
The essential characteristics of a plant variety must be stable after repeated propagation or in case of a particular cycle of propagation, at the end of each cycle.
Who can apply for the registration of a plant variety
An application for registering a plant variety can be made by:
Any individual who is claiming to be the breeder of the plant variety.
Any individual who is the successor of the breeder of the plant variety.
Any individual who is the assignee or the breeder of the variety in respect of the right to make such an application.
Any farmer, group of farmers or community of farmers who are claiming to be the breeder of that plant variety.
Any individual who has the authority to make an application on behalf of the farmers.
Any university or publicly funded agricultural institution that claims to be the breeder of the variety.
Why are plant varieties to be protected/registered
As India is a member of WTO (World Trade Organisation) and signatory of TRIPS, it is crucial for India to provide protection to plant varieties either via patents, the sui generissystem, or by both. Just like most of the developing nations, India decided to exclude patents for plants and plant varieties; however, it exercised the sui generis option for effective protection of plant varieties. India enacted ‘The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights’ (PPVFR) Act, 2001, for plant variety registration.
What are registrable patents in India
Under the PPVFR Act, 2001, there are 4 types of plant varieties that are registrable:
New variety
A variety that is not in public domain in India earlier than one year before the date of filing; or outside India, when it comes to trees or vines earlier than 6 years, or in any other case, earlier than 4 years.
Extant variety
Any variety that is not notified under the Seeds Act, 1966, or any new variety about which there is common knowledge or a farmers’ variety or any other variety that is in public domain is considered to be an extant variety.
Farmers’ variety
A variety that has been traditionally cultivated and evolved by the farmers in their fields or a type which is a wild relative or land race of a variety about which farmers possess common knowledge.
Essentially derived variety (EDV)
An essentially derived variety shall be said to be essentially derived from such an initial variety when it is predominantly derived from such an initial variety, or from a variety when it is predominantly derived from such an initial variety, while retaining the expression of the important features that lead to the genotype or combination of genotypes of such initial variety. An EDV conforms to such an initial variety that results from the genotype or combination of genotypes of such an initial variety.
What are non registrable plant varieties in India
All plant varieties are not entitled to legal protection in India, meaning some plant varieties are excluded from protection under the PPVFR Act, 2001. Any variety where prevention of commercial exploitation of any such plant variety is crucial to protect public order or public morality or human, animal and plant life and health, or to avoid serious prejudice to the environment, or any varieties that has terminator technology, or any variety that belongs to any species or general that is not enlisted in the notification issued by the Central Government cannot be registered for protection under the PPVFR Act, 2001.
Infringement of plant varieties
If any individual falsely represents a variety of plant as his/her/its registered variety, then the same act can be punished by imprisonment for a term not less than 6 months that is extendable up to 3 years or a fine amounting to not less than Rs. 1 lakh that is extendable up to Rs. 5 lakhs, or, at times, both.
Landmark cases one must know related to plant varieties
Maharashtra Hybrid Seed Co and Anr vs. Union of India and Anr [(2015) 217 DLT 175]
In the case of Maharashtra Hybrid Seed Co and Anr vs. Union of India and Anr [(2015) 217 DLT 175], the Delhi High Court held that the PPVFR Authority’s order that claimed that the parent lines of known hybrid varieties cannot be registered as a ‘new’ plant variety under the PPVFR Act. The Court held that if the hybrid comes under the category of ‘extant variety’ of which individuals have common knowledge, then its parental lines cannot be said to be novel.
Monsanto vs. Nuziveedu Seeds [2018 SCC OnLine Del 8326]
In the case of Monsanto vs. Nuziveedu Seeds [2018 SCC OnLine Del 8326], the Supreme Court set aside the order of the Delhi High Court that claimed that the patent by Monsanto Technology on BT cotton seeds was invalid as seeds cannot be patented under the Indian IP laws. Monsanto sold these genetically modified cottons in India in a joint venture with Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co., called Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (India) Ltd. (MMBL). This argument reached the Court when Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd. (NSL) continued to sell the genetically modified seeds even when MBBL had terminated its licence with NSL.The Supreme Court ruled out the order of the division bench and restored the order of the single judge bench.
Semiconductor integrated circuits layout design
What is a semiconductor integrated circuits layout design: a brief overview
In India, the semiconductor integrated circuits layout design is governed under the Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout-Designs Act (SICLDA), 2000. This Act was passed to comply with the TRIPS Agreement. This Act protects the layout designs of semiconductor chips and integrated circuits that are broadly used in a range of electronic products from computers to automobiles. IP rights protect all these three dimensional designs of integrated circuits, including the positioning of the electronic components.
Definition of semiconductor integrated circuits layout design
Under the SICLD Act the following definitions are of utmost importance:
Semiconductor integrated circuit
A semiconductor integrated circuit is defined as “a product having transistors or other circuitry elements, which are inseparably formed on a semiconductor material or an insulating material or inside the semiconductor material and designed to perform an electronic circuitry function”.
Layout design
The term ‘layout design’ is defined as “a layout of transistors, and other circuitry elements and includes lead wires connecting such elements and expressed in any manner in a semiconductor integrated circuit”.
Commercial exploitation
The term ‘commercial exploitation’ in relation to SICLD means “to sell, lease, offer or exhibit for sale or otherwise distribute such semiconductor integrated circuits for any commercial purpose”.
Examples of semiconductor integrated circuits layout design
The examples of semiconductor integrated circuits layout design, in India, include:
Basics of semiconductor integrated circuits layout design
Let us understand this pointer with the help of FAQs.
What is protected by the SICLD Act, 2000
Instead of requiring the designs’ incorporation in a physical semiconductor chip, the SICLD Act, 2000, protects the layout design itself. Thus, this IP right eliminates the need for protecting the actual article. Section 17 of the SICLD Act describes the same in an explicit manner. Registration requires a 3D representation of the layout design and compliance with all other statutory requirements before the design is actually registered.
Why do such layouts need IPR protection
Integrated circuits are created with the human mind and carry a high economic value, so it is necessary that they are protected. These designs are multi layered complex pieces of technology. It takes a lot of time, energy and funding to come up with such efficient designs; hence, these designs, technologies and products have to be protected with the help of strict IPR laws that are specially drafted for such complex patterns.
Why cannot patents protect the semiconductor integrated circuits layout designs
Chips consist of several subparts, and since some of them may be novel in nature by themselves, several applications for patents to be granted or registered will have to be filed. Simply put, for every such novel component, material used, chip, etc., a different patent application will have to be filed. This technique will obviously be time consuming and not feasible when it comes to modern technological advancements like semiconductor integrated circuit layout designs. Also, patents have to be original, distinct and non obvious and since circuits are typically upgraded from earlier versions, newer layout designs fail to meet the standards for patentability. Most of these chips and designs will be excluded from the ambit of patent law as the layout designs are of a developmental nature instead of being creative in nature.. Thus, the SICLD Act, 2000, provides for sui generis protection.
Characteristics/features of semiconductor integrated circuits layout design
The law protects the layout and designs of semiconductor integrated circuits with the help of a registration process.
There is a mechanism to distinguish which layout design can be protected.
There are rules to prohibit registration of layout designs that are not original in nature or those that have been commercially exploited.
The Act has several provisions relating to-
Determination of payment of royalty for registered layout design in case of innocent or unintentional infringement,
Penalties for infringement (in the form of imprisonment and fines), etc.
The registrar is appointed for administration and the Appellate Board is established in order to facilitate legal objectives.
Types of semiconductor integrated circuits layout design
There are no types of semiconductor integrated circuits layout design per se; however, there are 2 types of integrated circuit designs, namely:
Digital IC design,
Analog IC design.
Ownership of semiconductor integrated circuits layout design
The ownership for semiconductor integrated circuits layout design can be made by those individuals who claim to be the creator of the layout design, his legal representative, a person registered in the prescribed manner as a layout design agent or a person in the sole and regular employment of the principal, to be given in writing to the registrar in the prescribed manner. The application can be filed either alone or jointly. The application has to be filed with the territorial jurisdiction, i.e., a principal place of business in India of the applicant.
Exclusive right to the registered proprietor or owner of the layout
Once a layout design is registered, the proprietor gets the exclusive right to use the layout design and to obtain relief in case there is any infringement. This right is available to the registered proprietor of that layout design irrespective of whether the design was embodied in the article or not.
Term of semiconductor integrated circuits layout design
The registration of the layout design will only be for a period of 10 years that is calculated from the date of filing an application for registration or from the date where the first commercial exploitation began (anywhere in the country) whichever is earlier.
Registration of semiconductor integrated circuits layout design
Registration process for semiconductor integrated circuits layout design
The process for registering semiconductor integrated circuits layout design is as follows:
Filing an application by the creator in writing to the registrar in the SICLD registry in a prescribed form. It must also include-
3 sets of drawings produced to the plotter that talk about the layout design, and
3 sets of photographs of masks used for fabricating the semiconductor integrated circuits by using such a layout design or drawings which talks about the pattern of such masks.
The second step is acceptance of the application and it is done by returning a copy of the application. Please note, the registrar has the right to withdraw the acceptance if the application is prohibited from being registered for any reason. The registrar may also accept the application with some amendments.
The accepted application shall be advertised in the prescribed format within 14 days from the date of acceptance. If any opposition is found to such a registration, a notice is sent to the registrar within 3 months from the date of advertisement.
Then, the registrar may call for evidence by both the parties and finally reach an inference. The counter statement has to be filed within 2 months from the date of receipt of cpy f notice of opposition from the registrar. Also, a copy of the counter statement must be sent to the opposite party.
The registrar may also conduct a hearing between both the parties and then decide on where the layout design must be registered or not based on the conclusion thus reached after hearing the parties.
If any party is aggrieved by the decision taken by the registrar, an appeal can be made to the Appellate Board or if it is absent, an appeal can be made to the Civil Court for relief on any ruling of the Registrar.
In case the application is not opposed or if the opposition has been decided in favour of the applicant, the registrar shall register the said layout design in the register of layout design. Further, a certificate sealed with the seal of SICLD Registry will be issued in the favour of the applicant.
Infringement of semiconductor integrated circuits layout design
Under this law, any act that includes reproduction, sale, import or distribution of integrated circuit layout design for commercial purpose is regarded as infringement. However, if such an act is carried on for the purposes of scientific evaluation, analysis, research or teaching, it will not be considered as an act of infringement. Further, if any individual commits infringement, he/she shall be punished with an imprisonment for a term that is extendable for up to 3 years or a fine that will not be less than Rs. 50,000/- and is extendable to Rs. 10 lakhs. At times, imprisonment and fine both can be applied as punishment.
Landmark cases one must know related to semiconductor integrated circuits layout design
No Indian cases can be found, hence cases from an international perspective are discussed for the understanding of the readers.
Ocular Sciences Ltd vs. Aspect Vision Care Ltd. (1996)
In this case, the England and Wales High Court (Patent Court) held that the Plaintiff has failed to prove their claims of breach of confidence and copyright infringement. The Court further claimed that the Defendant had not breached the fiduciary duties to the Plaintiff.
HiTrend Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. vs. Renergy Micro-Technologies (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Yachuang Texin Electronics Co., Ltd. (2014)
In this case, the Court ruled that a company (Renergy Micro-Technologies (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.) must immediately stop infringing the exclusive rights granted to another Company- HiTrend Company. The Shanghai Court also claimed that the infringer must compensate the company with RMB3.2 million, considering the financial losses they sustained and also pay for the reasonable expenses they underwent to cease the infringement. Upon this judgement, the parties disagreed and agreed to accept the verdict and appeal to the Shanghai Higher People’s Court. The Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the original judgement.
Digital assets: a new budding form of IPR
A new form of IP that is being increasingly recognised is digital assets. This form includes-
Proprietary software or algorithms, and
Online digital content.
Examples of digital assets
The most common examples of digital assets can also include documents, audio, videos, logos, slide presentations, spreadsheets and websites. So, those materials have the potential to produce economic benefits.
Digital assets include but are not limited to:
Photos,
Audio files,
Videos and motion pictures,
PDFs,
Presentations,
Graphics,
Documents,
Designs,
Spreadsheets,
3d files,
E-books
and other relevant digital data that is in circulation, is, or will be stored on digital appliances like:
Personal computers,
Laptops,
Portable media players,
Tablets,
Data storage devices.
For instance, the need tree is said to have multiple uses in India and its usage is referred to as traditional knowledge. This application was mentioned in Indian contexts about 2000 years ago and is used for decades in agriculture, human and veterinary medicine, toiletries and cosmetics and also as an insect and pest repellent.
Why must traditional knowledge be protected
The major reasons as to why traditional knowledge has to be protected are as follows:
Consideration of equality.
Conservation questions.
For maintaining traditional customs and community.
For preventing appropriation of components of traditional knowledge by unauthorised persons.
For fostering the uses and its significance in development.
Regulations that govern protection of traditional knowledge
In India, the following laws and regulations protect the information passed on from generation to generation, a.k.a., traditional knowledge:
Biological Diversity Act, 2002
This Act deals with fundamental issues related to traditional knowledge like:
Right to use the natural assets.
Gathering and consuming such natural assets.
Dividing the profits that occur out of such an entrance.
Safeguarding assets from bio piracy.
The Patent Act, 1970
Under this Act, patent protection shall be granted for processes that are related to the use of assets (like microorganisms and plants or animals, etc.), and also for those processes that are known to indigenous areas which meet the same requirements.
The Copyright Act, 1957
Copyright protection can be given to those traditional knowledge holders whose imaginative demonstrative, mainly artists that belong to indigenous religious and indigenous groups, are protected from illegal reproduction and misuse of such demonstrations. The relationship between the creators/artists/authors and their work is being dealt with under moral rights in accordance with Section 57 of the Copyright Act, 1957.
The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers Rights Act (PPVFRA), 2001
Under this Act, the rights of a plant breeder if he/she discovers a new variety of plant which is distinct, stable, uniform and novel can be protected and registered. PBR (plant breeder’s rights) can also be obtained based on traditional plant diversity.
The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999
Under this Act, all methods of producing commodities and those techniques who have undergone a change or have evolved with time to yield better results can be protected. Further, GIs can be used to protect therapeutic products in India.
General cases pertaining to the protection of traditional knowledge
India does not have an explicit statute that protects traditional knowledge and folklore, but it is a work in progress. The following are some of the noteworthy cases involving traditional knowledge.
Neem
Over the past centuries, this tree that is well known in India has been used as biopesticide and medicine. This tree, as we know, has several medicinal and healing properties and the same has been mentioned in several ancient Indian Ayurveda texts. The EPO (European Patent Office) withdrew its patent number 436257 that was issued to the United States of America and to the cosmopolitan business W.R. Grace for the Neem tree insecticide extracted from the seed. Despite neem’s properties coming from an ancient tradition, about 12 UD patents were recently withdrawn and all of these involved neem based emulsions and solutions.
Turmeric
In 1993, the University of Mississippi Medical Centre received patent rights for curing a wound by applying turmeric onto a wound of an individual. An application for reexamining such a registration form filed along with about 2 dozen mentions,which upshot in early success.
Rice
The USPTO (United States Patent and Trademark Office) granted RiceTec, an American company, the patent for Basmati rice. In India, this created a lot of chaos and a request for reexamination of such registration was filed, which made the USPTO understand that the core claims made by the company were irrelevant.
What are some initiatives taken by the Indian Government to protect traditional knowledge
Mentioned below are some of the approaches initiated by the Indian government to protect traditional knowledge:
Beej Bachao Movement
In 1995, there was an affiliation with the residents of Jardhar in Tehri Garhwal district
of Uttar Pradesh, the NGO Kalpavriksh started a movement to trace the diversity of indigenous seeds and conservation practices by the local community.
Honey Bee Network
Honey Bee Network has the world’s largest grass-root novelty database. This network is run by SRISTI (Society for Study and Initiatives for Sustainable Technology & Institutions, Ahmadabad). The main motive of this network is to promote popular innovation, to protect IPRs for small innovators and to ensure that original innovators and information providers get the profit out of it.
Tabular representation on difference between types of IPs
Please note: Only the most important types of IPs are discussed, to serve academic purposes.
Pointers
Patent
Copyright
Trademark
Design
Geographical indication (GI)
Plant varieties
Trade secrets
Meaning
A patent safeguards an invention. It provides the owner the exclusive right to prevent others from selling, making and using the patented invention for a specific time period.
A copyright protects one’s expression of literary or artistic work. This protection arrives automatically thus giving the holder the exclusive right to control reproduction or adaptation.
A trademark is said to be a distinction sign that is used to differentiate between products or services of one business from that of the other. More often than not, trademarks are often closely interlinked to brands.
A design registration safeguards one from any form of outward appearance or aesthetic style of an object.
A geographical indication (GI) can be defined as a sign that is used on materials that have a specific geographical origin and have qualities or reputation that are due to that origin.
Plant varieties can be defined as the protection that gives legal protection to a plant variety to the one breeding it in the form of Plant Breeder’s Rights (PBRs).
A trade secret can be said to be formula, practice, process, design on compilation of information that is used by a business to gain some sort of advantage as compared to the competitors. These secrets are (by definition) not shared with the world at large.
Right protected
Any rights related to a new invention to manufacture the product patented or to make use of the process patented.
Any rights related to original, literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works, cinematograph films and records are protected here.
Any rights conferred to a particular mark, that could be in the form of-symbol, word, ordevice applied to articles of commerce to indicate the distinctiveness of goods.
Any rights conferred in respect of a new original design. Perhaps, the design must not be published anywhere across the country. It must be noted that designs generally do not protect functionality or unseen (internal) design elements.
Any rights of goods or services that belong to the specific origin, collective marks, certifications marks and the like are protected.
Any rights relating to a new plant variety, extant varieties or seeds are protected.
Any trade secret regarding a production method, a sales method or any other information on technology or business that is not known to the general public is protected.
Duration
Generally, patents are protected for 20 years from the date the application is filed. However, for an invention claiming the method or process of manufacture of a substance under Section 53 of the Patents Act, the duration is 5 or 7 years from the date of dealing the patent. Further, it will be 14 years in respect to other inventions; however, this time period was amended in 2002 (in accordance with the TRIPS requirement), and now the duration is 20 years, as discussed above.
Generally, copyrights are protected for the lifetime of the creator (or author) plus 6o years in the case of a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work (except photograph) under Section 23.The duration is also 60 years in the following cases-Posthumous work (Section 24),Photograph (Section 25),Cinematograph film (Section 26),Sound recordings (Section 27),Government works (Section 28),Public undertakings (Section 28A),International organisations (Section 29)
The duration for which a trademark may vary, but is usually 10 years and can be renewed (for another 10 years) from time to time.
The time period for registering a design is ten years from the date it was registered; however, this period can be extended for another 5 years through an application made in Form-3 followed by paying the requisite fees to the Controller. This process has to be followed before the expiration of the initial period of ten years.
Geographical indications are protected for ten 10 years and can be renewed from time to time for another 10 years.
The time period in the case of plant varieties varies and is as follows:Trees and vines (18 years from the date the variety was registered).Extant varieties (15 years from the date of notification of that variety by the Central Government under the Seed Act, 1966.Other crops (15 years from the date of registration of the variety.
As opposed to trademark, patents, trademarks, etc., trade secrets are protected without registration. Simply put, trade secrets do not need any procedural formalities in order to be protected. Additionally, a trade secret can be protected for an unlimited period of time unless it is discovered or legally acquired by others or made known to the general public. In simple words, a trade secret can be protected as long as the secret is kept.
Who can register
For patent, any individual who is the first inventor, assignee, or the legal representative of any deceased person who before his/her death was entitled to file an application for registration.
For each work, any individual or legal entity can file an application for copyright registration.
Any sole proprietor, partners, individual of LLP (limited liability partnership), private limited companies, etc., can file an application for trademark registration In India.
Any proprietor or owner of a design that is new and original and has not been previously published anywhere in any country and is not against public order or morality can apply for a design to be registered in India.
Any individual, manufacturer, organisation or authority established by or under any law can apply for registering GI of their product.
Any farmer or even group of farmers that claim that they are the breeders of a variety of a plant or any individual who has the power to file an application behalf of the University can file an application for registering a plant variety.
As we know there is no explicit law that discusses trade secrets in India.it is pertinent to note that, one can obtain trade secrets without protection and that there is no need to fulfil any formalities for registering a trade secret.
Effect of non registration non renewal
If a patent is not renewed again, the protection will end and enter public domain. Once a patent enters public domain, anyone can commercially exploit it without worrying about infringement.
Copyright in India lasts for 60 years, after which it becomes a part of the public domain and anyone can use it without seeking prior permission from the author.
If a trademark is not renewed within the stipulated time period, the registrar will remove the mark from the Register of Trademarks.
If a design is not renewed, the design will cease to have any effect and one cannot further sue any individual or organisation that uses the design.
In case a registered geographical indication is not renewed, it can be removed from the register.
Punishment for infringement
The punishment for a patent infringement is an imprisonment of a term extendable to 2 years or a fine, at times, both.
The punishment for copyright infringement is an imprisonment of up to 6 months and a minimum fine of Rs. 50,000.
The punishment for trademark infringement is imprisonment for a period of 6 months that is extendable to 3 years and a fine between Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 200, 0000.
The punishment for design infringement is a maximum of Rs. 25,000 for each breach that is recoverable and the amount recoverable for a single design should not exceed Rs. 50,000.
The punishment for GI infringement is imprisonment between 6 months and 3 years and a fine between 50,000 and 2 lakhs.
The punishment for plant varieties infringement is an imprisonment for 6 months that is extendable to 3 years or a fine between Rs. 1 lakh and Rs. 5 lakhs, at times both.
The punishment for infringement of a trade secret (or criminal breach of trust as there is no specific law regarding the same) is an imprisonment of up to 3 years or a fine.
Conclusion
We know, intellectual property can be used for several reasons, like-
Branding,
Marketing,
Protecting assets to have a competitive edge over other similar businesses, etc.
Further, these IPs, which are assets, cme in numerous shapes and sizes. Some assets do not have a physical presence (commonly known as intangible assets), but IP holds just as much value for corporations as that of tangible assets. Generally, patents involving logos or brand names which can be patented, registered and trademarked assist consumers in recognising popular companies and their products. Considering this, it becomes quite crucial for companies to take the requisite steps to protect such assets to prevent them from being misused or infringed by third parties.
Each type of IP comes with unique features and acts as a cornerstone for protecting these forms of innovation and expression. By learning about these types of IPs, including patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, plant varieties, etc., it is evident that IPs play an indispensable role in fostering innovation, safeguarding creators’ rights, and driving economic growth.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on types of intellectual property
Who owns intellectual property?
Generally, the individual who has created the work is regarded as the owner. Yet, intellectual property ownership can be said to vary depending on different types of property and under varying circumstances. For instance, if any work is created for an employer, the employer is regarded as the owner of that intellectual property. Further, there is a possibility that ownership rights can be transferred from one party to another.
What is the main object of intellectual property?
Intellectual property can be used for several reasons, like branding and marketing. Further, it is also used to protect assets that give a competitive edge over other similar or same businesses or products.
What is the scope of intellectual property rights?
The Convention, WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization) that established the word ‘intellectual property’ has provided quite a broad definition that intellectual property right shall include the rights related to-
Any type of literally, artistic and scientific work;
Any sort of performances of performing artists, phonograms, broadcasts;
Different inventions in all fields of human endeavour;
Scientific discoveries;
Industrial designs;
Trademarks, service marks;
Protection against unfair competition and all other rights that result from intellectual activity in the industrial, scientific, literary and artistic fields.
How can one avoid infringement of any type of intellectual property?
Usually, an intellectual property is infringed without knowledge or intention, i.e., unwittingly. In order to avoid being sued for infringement of any intellectual property, one must ensure that their company or organisation is not using any material that is either copyrighted or trademarked. Further, they must ensure that the brand logo is not similar to or resembling another brand in a manner that would mislead someone to think it was the other brand. Additionally, when it comes to patents, it is always a good idea to carry out a patent search to ensure that any ideas are their own and not otherwise. If the scenario is the opposite, one must find ways to licence them through proper channels.
Word of advice: There are several IP lawyers (in India and abroad) that have specialised in the process of this and they ensure that you (their client) are not using anybody else’s protected intellectual assets. Moreover, if any individual is hired to do creative work for another individual or his/her company or organisation, they must ensure that the contract between both parties has an explicit mention that any creative material that is generated becomes the property of the company and not the individual who was hired to complete the task.
Multiple Choice Questions on types of intellectual property
The following are some MCQs on types of IPs in India.
If an individual has used another artist’s background music in his/her music video, what would the act amount to?
Identity theft
Copyright infringement
Cyber-bullying
Hacking
Correct answer: b
Generally, the use of information and ideas are protected by IPR are of-
Cultural value
Moral value
Commercial value
Social value
Correct answer: c
Which among the following is closely related to IP rights?
TRIMS
MFN
GATS
TRIPS
Correct answer: d
Under what type of agreement is royalty paid on the basis of sale?
This article has been written by Uneza Khan. In this article, the author provides a comprehensive explanation of the case of Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras (1950) and how this landmark judgement left its footprints on the current judicial system. This article gives an overview of how freedom of speech and expression guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India acts as a bridge through which the views and opinions of people at large and the restrictions imposed on them can be articulated.
A very crucial element in democracy is freedom of speech and expression. Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948 provides that “everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes the freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media, regardless of frontiers”.
Freedom of speech and expression not only allows an individual to propagate their views, but it also includes the right to propagate or publish the views of other people existing in society. Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India, i.e. freedom of speech and expression, gives us the right to express one’s own views and opinions freely by word of mouth, writing, printing, pictures, or any other mode. One can express its views through any medium or visible representation, and for the same reason, freedom of the press is a medium to portray one’s own views, and thus it comes within the ambit of freedom of speech and expression, as it was rightly held in the case of Romesh Thappar vs. State of Madras (1950). It was noted that freedom of circulation is an indispensable element that justifies freedom of publication. Indeed, publication would be of little value without circulation. Fundamental rights give people the right to know.
Thus, in India, the freedom of the press flows from the freedom of speech and expression and enjoys no higher privilege than the freedom of speech and expression.
Details of the case
Case name:Romesh Thappar vs. The State of Madras
Case number: Petition No. XVI of 1950
Equivalent Citations: 1950 AIR 124, 1950 SCR 594, and AIR 1950 SUPREME COURT 124
Background of Romesh Thappar vs. State of Madras (1950)
The petitioner, Mr. Romesh Thappar, published articles in the weekly English journal called ‘Cross Roads’. The Madras government felt the need to ban the journal in Madras as the communist movement was taking place and the journal was nowhere involved in stopping the enthusiasm of the communist movement.
In March 1950, under Section 9(1-A) of the Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1949, which gave the government of Madras authority to prohibit the circulation, sale, or distribution of “Cross Roads” in specific areas of the province of Madras in order to ensure “public safety” or safeguard “public order,” the Madras government imposed a ban on the entry and circulation of the journal in such areas.
The petitioner approached the Supreme Court as this prohibition violated his fundamental right granted to him under the Constitution of India as well as questioned the validity of the said Act.
Facts of Romesh Thappar vs. State of Madras (1950)
The petitioner in this case was a printer, publisher, and editor of a weekly journal in English called “Cross Roads,” which was printed and published in Bombay. The respondent, the Government of Madras, in exercise of their powers under Section 9(1-A) of the Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1949, imposed a ban on the circulation and entry of the journal in the State of Madras. The order was published in the Fort St. George Gazette, and the notification was as follows:
“In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 9(1-A) of the Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1949 (Madras Act 23 of 1949), His Excellency the Governor of Madras, being satisfied that for the purpose of securing the public safety and the maintenance of public order, it is necessary so to do, hereby prohibits, with effect on and from the date of publication of this order in the Fort St. George Gazette, the entry into or the circulation, sale, or distribution in the State of Madras or any part thereof of the newspaper entitled Cross Roads, an English weekly published at Bombay.”
Issues raised inRomesh Thappar vs. State of Madras (1950)
Whether the petitioner’s directly approaching the Supreme Court of India under Article 32 of the Constitution of India for relief was valid, or was it required to approach the High Court first under Article 226 of the Constitution of India?
Whether the order issued by the Madras Government violated the petitioner’s fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression conferred upon him under Article 19 of the Constitution of India?
Whether Section 9(1-A) of the challenged Act (Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act) was valid under Article 13(1) of the Constitution of India?
Arguments of the parties in the case
Petitioner
The petitioner approached the Supreme Court of India, claiming that the ban by the Madras Government on the weekly journal Cross Roads is a violation of its fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression conferred upon him by Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.
He contended that under Article 13(1) of the Indian Constitution, Section 9(1-A) of the Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act is void, and he challenged the said Act for the reason that it was inconsistent with the fundamental rights granted to him.
Respondent
A preliminary objection was raised by the Advocate General of Madras that the petitioner did not follow the orderly procedure. He contended that the petitioner should have first approached the High Court of Madras and then the Supreme Court. He cited criminal revision petitions under Section 435 of the Criminal Procedure Code and applications for transfer under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure as illustrations where concurrent jurisdiction is granted to the High Court and the lower courts, and as a consequence, it has become a customary practice to seek relief from the lower court before resorting to the higher courts.
He cited cases like Shailabala Devi vs. Emperor (1933), where a criminal revision case involved such a rule of practice, and also referred to American decisions Urquhart vs. Brown(1907) and Mooney vs. Holohan (1935), which stated that the Supreme Court of the United States required that relevant judicial remedies to the applicant in Federal and State Courts should be exhausted before the remedy in the Supreme Court, be it habeas corpus or certiorari, would be allowed.
Laws discussed in Romesh Thappar vs. State of Madras
Constitution of India
Article 19, sub-sections (1)(a) and (2)
Article 19(1) of the Constitution of India guarantees six fundamental freedoms to every citizen of India, namely:
It gives the citizens of India freedom of speech, i.e., to propagate their views freely in any manner without any fear.
It grants the citizens of India the freedom of assembly. The assembly should be peaceful and unarmed and should not jeopardise public safety.
The constitution under this subsection gives the citizen the right to form associations, unions, or co-operative societies.
Freedom of movement is granted to the citizens of India. They can freely move from one place to another within the state.
Every citizen of India is guaranteed freedom of residence anywhere in India.
It also guarantees every citizen freedom of trade or business, any occupation, or to practise any profession.
Subsection 2 states that nothing in 19(1)a will restrict the power of the government from framing laws that restrict freedom of speech and expression when it is required for keeping peace in the country, maintaining good relations with foreign countries, upholding public order, morality, or decency, dealing with contempt of court, defamation, or encouraging people to not commit crimes.
Article 32
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar considered this Article as the heart and soul of the constitution. It empowers the citizens of India to seek remedies from the Supreme Court for infringement of their fundamental rights provided to them under Part III of the Indian Constitution. The Supreme Court can issue directions, orders, or writs like habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto, and certiorari. The exception to Article 32 is when the President, under Article 352, proclaims an emergency, and then Article 32 remains suspended.
Article 226
It gives the High Court the power to issue writs like habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto, and certiorari. Every high court shall have the power to issue a writ, order, or direction throughout the territory having its jurisdiction. It is broader in scope than Article 32 and can be applied to a violation of a legal right as well.
Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act (XXIII of 1949)
Section 9(1-A)
This section gives the government authority to impose restrictions on public assemblies for the purpose of public safety and to prevent disturbances.
Issue-wise judgement in Romesh Thappar vs. State of Madras (1950)
Whether or not the petitioner’s directly approaching the Supreme Court of India under Article 32 of the Constitution of India for relief was valid, or was it required to approach the High Court first under Article 226 of the Constitution of India?
The court opined that there is no correspondence between the instances given by the advocate general and the American decisions, which he referred to in Article 32 of the Indian Constitution. Article 32 of the Constitution gives more authority to the court than just granting specific writs for the enforcement of the rights granted by Part III for any purpose under Section 266 of the Constitution. Article 32 is a fundamental right, as it is included in Part III of the Constitution and provides a ‘guaranteed’ remedy for enforcement of the rights, and the Apex Court is the guarantor and protector of the fundamental rights. Thus, it cannot reject the applications for protection against the violation of fundamental rights. There is no similarity with the United States Constitution regarding this, and the American rulings are not relevant here.
Thus, the court held that in the matter relating to the enforcement of fundamental rights, the petitioner has the right to directly approach the Supreme Court, and there is no hierarchy here that needs to be followed.
Whether or not the order issued by the Madras Government violated the petitioner’s fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression conferred upon him under Article 19 of the Constitution of India?
The court held that public safety could be defined as anything that contributes to the preservation of public health. However, the interpretation of this meaning must change based on the circumstances. It further said that “ensuring public safety” in the matter of law and order might not include public health protection, it may include shielding the public from reckless driving on public roads and similar locations, as opposed to the state’s security. It was suggested by the court that penal punishments provided by any enactment, such as preventive arrest and publication bans, should be applied to situations that harm the security of the state rather than minor offences such as reckless driving or affray. The court also stated that the applicability and extent of a statute cannot be restricted to the aggravated forms of unfavourable activities executed to endanger the state’s security unless it expressly includes language that limits the application of a particular provision. Such limitations would not be affected by the intentions revolving around the objectives and desires of the framers of the Act. Additionally, there is no assurance that those with the authority to carry out these powers will appropriately distinguish between those who do and those who do not pose a threat to the security of the state. Public peace or tranquillity can have such severe repercussions that they can jeopardise a state’s security. The court ruled that it was clear that the impugned order passed was in violation of Article 19(1)(a) unless Section 9(1-A) of the impugned Act was saved by the restriction provided for in Article 19(2).
Whether or not Section 9(1-A) of the challenged Act (Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act) was valid under Section 13(1) of the Constitution?
As part of the right to freedom of speech and expression, freedom of circulation ensures that ideas may be freely propagated, or they can fall within the ambit of reasonable restrictions mentioned in clause (2) of Article 19. The question was whether Section 9(1-A), which authorises the State Government “for the purpose of securing the public safety or the maintenance of public order, to prohibit or regulate the entry into or the circulation, sale, or distribution in the province of Madras or any part thereof of any document or class of documents,” is a “law relating to any matter which undermines the security of the State or tends to overthrow the State”.
The court held that in order to ensure the state’s security, the Constitution of India requires a line to be drawn between severe and provoking forms of public disorder and the areas of “public order” and tranquillity. Minor disruptions of the peace that only affect a small region should not be addressed equally with disturbances at the national level, and such violations should be handled distinctly.
The court also determined that removing the term ‘sedition’ from Article 13 of the draft constitution, which later became Article 19, indicated that restrictions on freedom of speech and expression should be applied only to issues that directly threaten state security or aim to overthrow the government, rather than to matters that criticise the government or incite disaffection or hatred towards it. As a result, the court opined that Section 9(1-A) of the Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, which grants authority to the Madras government to impose restrictions with the aim of maintaining public order or ensuring public safety, does not fall within the ambit of limitations on the right to freedom of speech and expression as covered in Article 19(2). And hence, the provision was declared unconstitutional and invalid, as it was not allowed to be restricted as per the Constitution of India.
Dissenting Opinion
Justice Fazl Ali gave a dissenting judgement in this case. He related the judgement of Brij Bhushan & Another vs. State of Delhi (1950) with the present case, as the question revolved around the same matter. He further explained by referring to the preamble that the central issue in this case was whether ‘disorders involving threats to the peace and tranquillity of the province’ and affecting ‘public safety’ constituted a threat to the safety of the State. In his view, the answer to these questions is affirmative.
The law in question, which prohibits entry into the State of Madras of “any document or class of documents” for safeguarding public safety and maintaining public order, should satisfy requirements laid down in Article 19(2) of the Indian Constitution.
He then opposed the argument that the entry of any seditious document could be validly prohibited. Entry of any document that affects public tranquillity and public safety cannot be prohibited because these matters do not affect the security of the state.
In the case of Brij Bhushan vs. State of Delhi (1950), he quoted that sedition, according to Sir James Stefan, is an offence against public tranquillity and it is considered a cause of concern for the security of the state, but public safety and disturbances are not.
The argument that a small riot or affray would not compromise the security of the state is met with two responses: firstly, the Act, as stated in its Preamble, is designated for disorders including menace to the peace and tranquillity of the province, and secondly, there are different levels of gravity associated with the offence of sedition. While a single, insignificant piece of writing that is mildly seditious may not, in the opinion of the general public, compromise state security, it doesn’t alter the legislation that aims to prevent sedition.
Additionally, it was stated that while the state executive may misuse the current legislation, this is not the same as the law being unconstitutional. Only the latter is of significance to them in this matter.
Analysis and after-effects of Romesh Thappar vs. State of Madras (1950)
Freedom of speech and expression is fundamental in a democracy, and as it was rightly said by George Washington,
“If the freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent, we may be led, like sheep, to the slaughter.”
It is essential for a democratic nation to allow its citizens to propagate their views, as well as the right to propagate the views of others. Democracy can flourish not only under the vigilant eye of its legislature but also under the due diligence and guidance of public opinion, and the press is, par excellence, the best vehicle through which opinion can be articulated.
Romesh Thappar vs. State of Madras (1950) has been a significant judgement in this regard, which uplifts the freedom of speech and expression through the press. The Indian Parliament Amended the Constitution in 1951 with the First Constitutional Amendment in response to the judgement in this case. The Amendment established “public order” as a reasonable restriction on the right to free speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. The Indian Prime Minister at the time, Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru, recommended the Article’s revision on behalf of the interim administration. Three reasons were given by the Amendment to restrict the right to free speech and expression:
a) public order;
b) provoking an offence; and
c) friendly relations with a foreign state.
The Supreme Court interpreted the scope of Article 19(1)(a) in the case of Sakal Newspapers (P) Ltd. & Ors. vs. Union of India (1962) that the right is broad enough to encompass the freedom of press, which is regarded as a “species of which freedom of expression is a genus”. And again, in the case of Indian newspaper vs. Union of India & Ors. (1986), the Supreme Court held that the term freedom of the press is not used in Article 19, but still it is considered a part of Article 19(1)(a). Freedom of the Press stands as the heart and soul of democracy, and it is the responsibility of the court to uphold this right and invalidate all the acts that are contrary to the constitutional mandate so as to ensure transparency with the citizens of the country.
In the landmark judgement of Bennett Coleman & Co. vs. Union of India (1973), it was held that “freedom of speech and press is the ark of the covenant of democracy because public criticism is essential to the working of its institutions”. Article 19(1)(a), which gives the right to freedom of speech and expression, has certain exceptions under Article 19(2), which can be imposed by the state government and grants the authority to the state to enact laws restricting the right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) without completely compromising the right to freedom of free speech and expression in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the state, friendly relations with foreign states, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court, defamation, or incitement to an offence.
In the case of Prabhu Dutt vs. Union of India & Others (1982), it was held that freedom of the press includes the right to know information as well as news related to the workings of the government, but this is subject to some restrictions in society’s best interest. The information can be procured only when the person willfully provides it. In this case, the Court ordered Tihar Jail’s Superintendent to allow the chief reporter of the Hindustan Times to interview two convicts of death sentence, namely Ranga and Birla, who gave their consent to do so under Article 19(1).
In the case of Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India (2015), the constitutional validity of Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, was challenged as it was violative of the right to freedom of speech and expression guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a), and it does not fall under reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2). The Supreme Court in this case distinguished between incitement, discussion, and advocacy. The court opined that where there is clear and evident incitement, reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2) on free speech and expression may be imposed.
It was held that Section 66A is competent to restrict all forms of internet communications as it doesn’t “make any distinction between mere discussion or advocacy of a particular point of view, which may be annoying, inconvenient, or grossly offensive to some, and incitement by which such words lead to an imminent causal connection with public disorder, security of state, etc”. Section 66A is unable to show a direct connection between protecting public order and its implementation.
Now, let’s shed some light on the exceptions to the right to freedom of speech and expression:
In Hamdard Dawakhana v. Union of India, (1960), the validity of the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954, was challenged on the ground that it violates the freedom of speech and expression guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a). The Act restricts the advertisement of drugs in some matters and prohibits the advertisement for certain purposes of medicines that have been claimed to have magical qualities. It was held by the Apex Court that, though advertisement is a type of speech, not every advertisement deals with the matter of freedom of speech and expression of ideas. The Act was held valid by the Court, and the court has opined that freedom to do business under Article 19(1)(g) includes commercial advertisement and does not come within the ambit of Article 19(1)(a), i.e., freedom of speech and expression. Further, the advertisement for promotion of business or trade falls within the ambit of freedom of business under Article 19(1)(g). Thus, restrictions can be imposed for the benefit of the general public. Article 19(1)(a) does not include the advertisement of prohibited drugs within its ambit.
Conclusion
The fundamental principle of the right to freedom of speech and expression is to give people the right to know, to express their views, and to know the truth. Romesh Thappar vs. State of Madras is a significant case in relation to this matter, which has left its footprints till the present day. There have been times where, just because of the fear of the government, genuine people were made silent.
Freedom of speech and expression stand indispensable in a democracy, and freedom of the press is an undistinguished part of it, as it was rightly said by Dr. Ambedkar in his speech in Constituent Assembly Debates (Vol. VII, 980): “The press has no special rights that are not to be given or which are not to be exercised by the citizens in their individual capacity. The editor of a press or the manager are merely exercising the right of expression, and therefore, no special mention is necessary of the freedom of the press”. In all democratic countries, freedom of the press acts as a ray of light in the dark. The newspapers act as a collective display of ideas, opinions, and ideologies. The need to guard the public interest by disclosing the misdeeds, failures, and lapses of the government is very essential. The cornerstone of a democracy is the presence of strong, independent, and powerful media, especially in a country with a diverse population like India. Justice Hand of the Supreme Court of the United States summed up the increased role of the media in the present globalised and tech-savvy world when he said, “The hand that rules the press, the radio, the screen, and the far spread magazine, rules the country”.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is India’s rank in the Press Freedom Index 2023?
The World Press Freedom Index is an annual report published by Reporters Without Borders (RSF). India’s rank in the World Press Freedom Index will be 161 out of 180 countries in 2023.
Who pronounced a dissenting opinion in the Romesh Thapar vs. State of Madras case?
Justice Fazl Ali pronounced a dissenting opinion in the Romesh Thapar vs. State of Madras case.
What are some landmark cases in which Romesh Thapar vs. State of Madras cited?
The landmark cases in which Romesh Thappar vs. State of Madras was cited were: Shreya Singhal vs. Union of India (2015), State of Bombay vs. F.N. Balsara (1951), Sakal Papers (P) Ltd. vs. The Union of India (1962), Bennett Coleman & Co. vs. Union of India (1973), among others.
References
Dr.J.N.Pandey, Constitutional Law of India-59th edition (2022)
This article is written by Harshit Kumar. This article discusses in detail the judgement delivered in the case of Dr. Gulshan Prakash v. State of Haryana, 2009 (14) SCALE 290 in which the power of the State to make provision for the socially and educationally backward classes in postgraduate courses is discussed. This case analysis discusses the discretionary power of the State in making such provisions and also specifies the instances when the State can decide not to make any such provision. This article also discusses the purpose of the issuance of the writ of mandamus and certain conditions under which it cannot be issued. The article discusses the cases relied on by the Apex Court to arrive at its final decision. Lastly, this article discusses some critical points that the Court should have considered while coming to its final decision.
Human development is a method of broadening the choice of every individual, and not just for any particular section of the community or for any particular individual. The process of development becomes unequal and unjust when a particular group is left out of the mainstream development process. In a democracy, it is very essential for the government to give great importance to upholding the rights of citizens and eradicating injustice. Achieving equality in status and opportunity along with social, economic and political justice is one of the goals set in the Preamble of the Constitution of India. The Constitution even provides directions for the State to implement various Directive Principles of State Policy to ensure socioeconomic equality among the citizens. The architect of the Constitution, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, in his speech in the Constituent Assembly, on the adoption day of the Constitution, highlighted the then-existing inequality on the social and economic plane, stating that there is a dire requirement to remove this inequality at the earliest, or else those who are facing these inequalities will destroy the political democracy, built laboriously by the Assembly. Hence, the introduction of the reservation system in independent India, through the Constitution.
The reservation of seats in the educational institution is one of those reservations given to the socially and educationally backward classes of citizens through the Constitution (1st Amendment) Act, 1951, by the introduction of Clause (4) of Article 15, as a result of the decision of the Honourable Supreme Court of India in the case of State of Madras vs. Champakam Dorairajan (1951). The Apex Court in this case struck down the Madras Government’s order of reserving the seats for various communities in the medical college. The Court found that this order was in violation of Article 15(1) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of religion, race, caste, sex and place of birth. Therefore, following the concerns raised because of the Supreme Court’s decision, the First Amendment Act brought clause (4) under Article 15, which gave power to the State Government to make special provisions for the upliftment of the Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes or the socially and educationally backward classes people in education sector.
The landmark case of Dr. Gulshan Prakash & Ors vs. State of Haryana & Ors (2009) revolves around the matter of reservation for the socially and educationally backward classes and SC/ST candidates under the post graduation (PG) degree of the medical colleges. The Court discussed the discretionary power provided to the State to make special provision to provide such reservation, and ruled that, if a State decides not to make any such special provision then that cannot be brought to the Apex Court as a matter of violation of the Fundamental Right, through a writ of mandamus. The reason behind this decision will be discussed in detail, further.
Facts of Dr. Gulshan Prakash vs. State of Haryana, 2009
The State of Haryana, vide a notice dated 12/11/2007, directed Maharshi Dayanand University (hereinafter referred to as “MDU”), Rohtak, to conduct an entrance test for admissions to PG/MD/MS diploma and MDS courses. This exam was conducted for the session of 2008-2009 in the government medical colleges and dental colleges in the State of Haryana. The State of Haryana also directed Pt. B.G. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak to take on the counselling and complete the admission process under the said courses, under the same notification. There was a prospectus released by MDU, Rohtak for conducting the PG/MD/MS diploma and MDS courses entrance test in the government medical colleges and dental colleges, for the session 2008-2009, as directed by the notification released.
The appellants herein approached the Commissioner and Health Secretary, Ministry of Health and Education, Government of Haryana, Panchkula, to include the reservation for the SC/ST in the postgraduate courses (MS/MD/MDS/diploma) PGIMS as per the issued guidelines by the State Government on 19/03/1999, on 15/12/2007. However, they received no response, therefore, the appellants approached the High Court through a writ petition, praying for a quashing of the prospectus, but that was dismissed. Aggrieved by this decision, the petitioners took this matter under special leave petition before the Supreme Court and prayed for the issuance of a writ of mandamus along with other reliefs under Article 32 of the Constitution.
Issues raised
Listed below are the five major issues raised in this case:
Whether the power given to the State under Article 15(4) is a discretionary power or mandatory power?
Whether the Court can issue a writ of mandamus to the State directing it to make reservation provisions?
Where the State Government has given reservation in undergraduate courses under Article 15(4), is it bound to give such reservation in postgraduate courses also?
Where the Government of India has itself given the provision of reservation for SC/ST in all the medical postgraduate courses, under Article 15(4), does it automatically apply to the selections where the State Government has the regulating powers?
Who is eligible to exercise the power given by Article 15(4) to provide reservation or to make special provisions for the advancement of socially and educationally backward classes or SC/ST?
Arguments of the parties
Appellants
The contention started with putting some of the facts forward by the appellants about the organisations providing reservations to the SC/ST. According to them, a prospectus was published by MDU for the MBBS/BHMS/BDS/BAMS entrance test, on 07/08/2000, for admissions to medical/ayurvedic/dental/homoeopathic colleges/universities in Haryana. As per the notification the prospectus provided seats in various categories among which 20% of the seats were reserved for the Scheduled Castes.
It was further presented that there was a reservation provided by all the institutions including the All India Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS) to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes on 17/09/2005, in the postgraduate courses. Further, in the session of 2007 reservation was provided to the SC/ST members in the postgraduate courses, by the Government Medical College, Patiala, Amritsar and Faridkot. Furthermore, the University of Delhi including some other States were also providing reservations to the SC/ST members in the postgraduate courses.
Putting these points forward the appellants wanted to contend that, where the reservation was provided by so many institutions for undergraduate and postgraduate courses, and where the State of Haryana had itself given the reservation for postgraduate courses in the session of 2007, then the same should be provided in the current session as well because as per Article 15(4), it is mandatory for the State to follow this provision and necessarily provide reservation to SC/ST and Other backward classes (OBC) for postgraduate courses as well.
The appellant also contended that the Government of India already has provided reservation to the SC/ST candidates in all India entrance examinations for postgraduate courses, then the State of Haryana is under an obligation to do the same and issue an order or directives to to provide reservation to the SC/ST in the postgraduate courses. Further, the prospectus that was issued does not have any provision for reservation, it is improper and must be quashed.
Respondents
The respondents were up with their contention that the State of Haryana already had provided reservation in MBBS/BHMS/BDS/BAMS which are under graduation courses, and since there is no reservation with respect to the post-graduation course, therefore, the issued prospectus for the post-graduation courses does not include any reservation clause.
It was further contended that Article 15(4) is only an enabling provision, therefore after taking proper notes of various aspects, the State of Haryana came to the decision that no reservation shall be provided to the Scheduled Cast, Scheduled Tribes and Other backward Classes in post graduation courses. Further, in pursuance to the relief clause pertaining to the issuance of a writ of mandamus, they pointed out that for any particular class of people, there cannot be a mandamus directing the State to provide reservations to them under the postgraduate courses.
Furthermore, the State (one of the respondents), contended that they have time and again discussed and expressed through various notifications about their decision not to provide reservations to SC/ST/backward classes for admissions in postgraduate courses. In the matter of reservation, the State has always taken the recommendations of the Medical Council of India into consideration and has decided that reservation in postgraduate courses is neither feasible nor needed, the reason being that there is already reservation on 50% of the seats for the courses of MD/MS/PG diploma and course of MDS in the institutes of State of Haryana through all India entrance examination, conducted by All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi, and the appellants have already been benefited by the reservation of the seats in their MBBS/BDS qualifying examination.
The respondents also contended that only the State is an appropriate authority to decide on reservations in the State. The appellants before the Court are under the wrong impression that the State had already taken a decision to provide reservation to the SC/ST/backward classes in the postgraduate courses, however, the State has time and again made its decision very clear through different notifications, informing about no such reservations in the postgraduate courses.
Judgement in Dr. Gulshan Prakash vs. State of Haryana, 2009
The Court dismissed the contentions of the appellants and also dismissed the prayer for a writ of mandamus. The Court gave the reasoning of this decision in detail by referring to various precedents.
Rationale behind the judgement
One of the major questions in this case was the nature and objective of Article 15(4). This Article reads as
“(4) Nothing in this Article or in clause (2) of Article 29 shall prevent the State from making any special provision for the advancement of any socially or educationally backward classes of citizens or for the Scheduled Castes or for the Scheduled Tribes.”
This Article enables the State to make special provisions for socially and educationally backward classes of citizens, specifically for the Scheduled Castes and for the Scheduled Tribes. These provisions will be for encouraging and increasing the participation of these backward classes of society in getting higher education.
As per the Apex Court, as ruled in this case, this provision is an enabling provision and not a compulsory provision. This means that this provision does not put a mandatory obligation on the State but gives discretion to the State to make provisions for the socially and educationally backward classes and provide reservations in post-graduate courses.
Another major issue was the issuance of the writ of mandamus. The appellant prayed to the court to issue a writ of mandamus directing the State Government to open the doors of reservation for the SC/ST and other backward classes for the postgraduate courses.
Mandamus is a type of writ or judicial remedy in which the government, court, corporation or other public organisation are directed by a higher authority to do something or refrain from doing something that they are required to do or not do by the law, or as the case may be. These actions could be a public duty or a statutory duty, in some cases. This cannot be issued to force an authority to do something which is against the law or which is prohibited by the law (Hope Textiles Ltd. vs. Union of India, 1995). A mandamus cannot be prayed by anyone whose legal right is not infringed. Whoever prays for a mandamus must have a legal grievance which is protected legally and also the Courts can enforce it. The infringement is said to occur when an authority denies a legal right to someone, where it is legally obliged to provide such right to the same person or party (Mani Subrat Jain vs. State of Haryana, 1977).
In this case, the Apex Court observed that no writ of mandamus can be issued against the State to direct them to make any special provision to provide reservations to the SC/ST/SEBC candidates in postgraduate courses.
Precedents referred
While discussing the very first issue that was raised in this case, the learned counsel for appellants, Dr. Krishnan Singh Chauhan, cited the decision made by the seven judges bench, in the case of State of Kerala vs. N.M. Thomas (1975). In this case, the constitutionality of Rule 13-AA of the Kerala State and the Subordinate Services Rules, 1958, which relates to giving exemption to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes members from some special and departmental test for the promotion purpose, for a determined timeline, was in question.
The Court observed the decision made by the Apex Court then and found that the majority upheld the validity of Rule 13-AA of the Kerala State and the Subordinate Services Rules, 1958. However, in the overall decision, the Court did not consider the implications and effect of Article 15(4), particularly, whether it is just an enabling provision or if it makes it mandatory for the State to provide reservations in postgraduate courses.
The next case, to which the Court took reference was a judgement given by the nine judges bench in the case of Indra Sawhney vs. Union of India (1992), the bench, while considering Article(s) 16(4) and 16(1), 15(4), 14, 32 and 340, discussed the nature of Article 16(4).
The major question before the Court was, whether Article 16(4) includes the entire idea of reservation or is it exhaustive of the concept of reservation. In other words, if the reservation can be provided under any other provision, like Article 16(1)?
The Court observed that there are two different opinions on this issue;
Firstly, Article 16(4) is not exhaustive of the idea of reservation, it is rather exhaustive for reservation decisions made only for the underprivileged classes or backward classes. However, it does not mean that just because it states one form of classification as a specific clause, the very idea and power of classification implied under Article 16(1) exhaust thereby. But, at the same time, any special provision that is made under Article 16(4), should in accordance with Article 16(1), that too in extremely rare circumstances and not for any random reasons. In any such extreme situation, the Court has to make sure that the made provision is for the public interest and it is to address a particular situation.
Secondly, Article 16(4) ought to serve as a disincentive to further develop classes that have the right to preferential treatment. The reason is simple, it would not be appropriate to make reservation provisions under Article 16(4) and Article 16(1) because this will reduce the number of vacancies for both the reserved categories and free competition.
The Court further referred to the case of K. Duraisamy vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2001), in which while discussing the reservation at the postgraduate level and super speciality level, the three judges bench observed that it is a well-written and well-settled notion that the State Government has the power and right to decide that through which source, the admissions to educational institutions, or to certain courses or disciplines have to be made, and up to what proportion. The Court has consistently upheld and maintained the notion that the reservation as known as “protective discrimination” should be avoided for those who are deemed to be backward class, as not permissible, on the postgraduate level or superspeciality level. Even if the reservation is claimed in this case, for and in favour of the in-service candidates, it cannot be equated or compared to the collaborative reservations envisaged under Article 15(4) and Article 16(4). These reservations require a special procedure of implementation to ensure that they are kept to a minimum by excluding the candidates who are selected by open competition on the basis of their merit as against the reserved quota for collective consideration.
Considering the same issue in the case of All India Institute of Medical Science Student Union vs. All India Institute of Medical Science (2001) (hereinafter referred to as “AIIMS case”), the Court observed that, when for the promotion of equalisation the protective discrimination is pleaded then the onus lies on the party that is attempting to justify the ex facie deviation from equality. The Constitution guarantees equal opportunity to every person as a Fundamental Right. Any candidate who has achieved higher marks is eligible for admission preference. As per the idea of equal opportunity to equal marks, merit should be a criterion for choosing the top candidates. The significance of this idea increases as the level goes up, like post-graduation courses. As an exception, the reservation can be justified to remove the burden of those who are educationally handicapped and that reservation is to overcome that situation. The justification for reservation for medical students must be the eradication of any similar or different geographical disadvantages or class inadequacy. At the same time, the reservation shouldn’t be in excess of the requirement and harmful to society. Reservation has a lesser role to play the higher the level of speciality goes.
It was further observed in the same case that, permissible reservation is a step, at the lowest or primary level, to bring those underprivileged candidates to society at a level equal to the privileged one, which they cannot achieve until and unless they are pushed protectively. Once that level is achieved that protection is needed to be removed in favour of those underprivileged candidates so that they can gather strength and confidence to go beyond this on the basis of their own merit. If the protection continues at the higher level as well, then it will make the underprivileged candidates more vulnerable and then they will require this support at every step and every level. Therefore, apart from being feasible from a constitutional standpoint, in order to be accepted, any reservation should be reasonable. Hence, whenever any reservation is implemented then it is crucial to check whether the quantum and character of it will be able to achieve the objective for which it is implemented.
Thus, this contention of appellants was dismissed and the Court was consistent in its view that Article 15(4) is an enabling provision and it is the discretion of the State Government whether to provide such reservation by passing legislation or by issuing an executive instruction.
Discussing the next issue of mandamus, the Court referred to the case of Union of India vs. R. Rajeswaran & Another (2001), in which it was prayed to give directions for the inclusion of reservation for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes to the seats which were set apart for the All-India pool of MBBS/BDS list. The Court here observed that, as discussed by the Court in the case of Ajit Singh (II) vs. State of Punjab (1999), Article 16(4) does not create any constitutional duty or obligation on the State, rather it is discretionary. The language of Article 15(4) is the same, so the idea that a mandamus can be issued to either provide reservation or provide relaxation is not acceptable. Hence, the appeal claiming for the reservation was dismissed.
Coming to the third issue, where the State Government has given reservation in undergraduate courses under Article 15(4), is it bound to give such reservation in postgraduate courses also?, there was a case that the learned counsel for appellants referred to is the decision made by the Constitutional bench in the case of Dr. Preeti Srivastava & Anr vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors (1999), submitting that, where it is permitted to set a lower minimum percentage of qualifying marks for the candidates of reserved category than the candidates of general category, there the State must set that lower minimum qualification percentage for the SC/ST candidates at postgraduate level also.
However, when the Court looked into the details of the case, it found that,
The issue of reservation of the SC/ST at the postgraduate level of medical education was not discussed, because this issue was not debatable before them and they gave no opinion on it.
The minimum qualification percentage must be set as per the standards outlined by the Medical Council of India, for postgraduate medical studies because the medical entrance examination is not merely a screening test and more than that.
When it comes to the issue of deciding whether any lower minimum marks for the postgraduate medical studies for SC/ST candidates must be set, then this question should be addressed by the Medical Council of India because it directly impacts the quality of the post-graduation level of medical studies. Even if any lower minimum marks is set for the candidates of the reserved category then there should not be a big difference between the qualifying marks for the reserved category candidate and the qualifying marks of the general category candidates, at this higher level of studies. So the difference of 20% of qualifying marks for the SC/ST category candidates and 45% of qualifying marks for the general category candidates is not permitted under Article 15(4) and such difference will be absurd for the level of post-graduation, and this will be against the public interest.
Admissions into any super speciality courses can be on a merit basis, solely. Any special provision for it isn’t permissible and that will also be against the public interest.
It was clear from the decision that the Court in the above case did not examine the permissibility of reservation in postgraduate medical courses. It, however, did express that setting of lower minimum qualification marks for the candidates of reserved category for the postgraduate medical education is permissible, and that should be done by the Medical Council of India. The Court focused on the minimum qualification percentage set by the Council, which was 40% for the reserved category candidates and 50% for the general category candidates. In the light of this decision, the contention made by the counsel of the appellant that if the State has provided reservation at the undergraduate level it should provide reservation at the postgraduate level was dismissed.
Finally, the last case that the appellant referred to was Abhay Nath & Otr vs. University of Delhi & Otr (2006), where the reservation quota was pointed out by the Additional Solicitor General. It was seen that of the 50% seats of all India quota, 22.5% were reserved for SC/ST students. It would be challenging for the State to provide the whole percentage of reservations out of the 50% of the seats remaining for them to be filled up. It will be equally challenging for the Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS) to have complete 22.5% reservation out of the 50% seats reserved for the all-India entrance examination. It was, therefore, suggested that the Union of India had agreed to reserve 22.5% of seats for the SC/ST candidates from the academic year 2007-2008 onwards. Hence, the 50% seat of all India quota included the 22.5% seats reserved for the SC/ST candidates.
The Court observed that the directions given by the Court in the above case referred to the all India quota, but that does not have any effect on the admissions meant for State quota.
Ratio of the judgement
The Court came to the following conclusions in pursuance of the underlying issues in the case:
The power given to the State Government by Article 15(4) is a discretionary power. Article 15(4) is an enabling provision, which means it provides power to the State Government to make any provision for the upliftment of the SC/ST/backward classes of the society wherever it thinks is required. However, this provision does not put a mandatory obligation on the State to make any provision that it doesn’t think is fit for the society of that region, nor can the Court or any higher authority force it or pressurise it to make any such provision.
In this case, the Court observed that the Government of Haryana, on 05/11/1988, considered and decided not to provide any reservation in PG/diploma courses admissions, for the very first time. Later, a letter was released on 01/01/1991, in which it was mentioned that the Government of Haryana was not in favour and would not provide any reservation for SC/ST in PG/degree/diploma courses Later again, through a letter dated 26/04/2002, the State Government announced that there will be no reservation for SC/ST candidates for admissions in post graduation courses in PGIM, Rohtak. From this, it is clear that the State does not intend to provide any reservation to SC/St at PG level and this decision suffers from no infirmity. Moreover, the State also said that this decision was taken after careful consideration of the recommendations given by the Medical Council of India, and also considered the other precedents/decisions made by other States, and concluded that reservation is not feasible in the State of Haryana.
The Court finally observed that the State Government has conveyed its decision to not provide reservations to SC/ST/backward classes people on the postgraduate level, more than once. Therefore, the Court cannot issue a mandamus against the decision of the State and also the prospectus cannot be faulted for not including any reservation clause.
The Apex Court further observed that the socially and educationally backward class will be given any privileged treatment only when it is required, and this is the very principle behind Article 15(4). Article 15(4) enables the State to create policies for the betterment of SC/ST, providing them reservations for admissions to educational institutions. Furthermore, this Article merely implements the principle of reasonable classification and is not an exception. There is no mandatory obligation on the state to make any reservation provision if there is no requirement as such, under Article 15(4), and the power to make such provision is purely discretionary, therefore, no writ can be issued to direct the State Government to make any reservation policy. Moreover, even though the reservation is permissible to be provided to the SC/ST at the postgraduate level, the State of Haryana has made a decision to not provide any such reservation and can also not make a situation of issuing a writ of mandamus. The reason being that, medical education is a significant matter which should not be subject to any mandatory conditions of this kind which can lead to a situation which is against the public interest, and as mandated by the Constitution, the State Government is the best authority to check and decide what is required and beneficial for the State.
Where the State Government has provided reservations to SC/ST candidates in undergraduate courses, that does not make it mandatory for the State Government to provide such reservations to SC/ST in postgraduate courses as well. Even though the reservation on postgraduate courses is permissible, the State Government being the appropriate authority to decide the requirement of the State can decide not to provide any such reservation. The discretion lies in the hands of the State Government to decide whether the SC/ST candidates should be given any reservation at levels like post-graduation courses or super speciality courses or not, or the selection should be on a merit basis.
It is true that the Government of India itself has made a reservation provision for SC/ST candidates. This provision is applicable in respect of all India medical entrance examinations for MD/MS/PG Diploma and MDS courses, and SC/ST reservation in all India quota for PG seats. However, the same provision will not be applicable in the selections where the State has the regulation power.
Article 15(4) is not an exception clause but a provision that allows special application of power to enact any other special provision providing reservation to the underprivileged classes of the society. This power is discretionary and it depends on the State whether to bring provision by passing legislation or by issuing an executive notice, which means it is either the Legislature or the Executive body that can bring such special provision.
Critical analysis of Dr. Gulshan Prakash vs. State of Haryana, 2009
The decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Dr. Gulshan Prakash vs. State of Haryana (2009) has played a significant role in deciding and showcasing the parameters of Article 15(4) of the Constitution. Clause 4 of Article 15, which was brought by the First Constitutional Amendment, 1951, gave power to the State Government to make any provision to provide reservation to the socially and educationally backward classes (SEBCs), Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST), for uplifting their participation and their advancement in education. This case highlighted the discretionary power of the State to make such provisions and brought up some critical points for further analysis.
Key points
Prioritising merit over equality: The Court’s observation in the case focusing on the merit of the candidates for the selection at the post-graduation level is much appreciated, however, this runs counter to the objectives of affirmative action. Where the reservation policies are made with an aim to prevent the past injustice faced by the SC/ST/SEBC people, relying solely on merit would unintentionally reinforce those disparities again.
The discretion given to the State Government and the lack of accountability: Article 15(4) gives the State Government complete discretion to make provisions as per requirement, which means the State Government has complete discretion to make the provision for the institutes regulated by the State Government. At the same time, there is no such mechanism introduced which will keep a check on the extent of the use of this discretion. It lacks the framework to ensure this discretionary power is not misused by the State at any point of time. The State may take some decision of not providing reservations to the SC/ST/SEBC candidates for some reasons unrelated to the sincere requirements assessments.
Lack of data-driven policy making: While discussing the case the Court missed emphasising on the significance of data in examining the reservation policies. The better way to understand if any policy or provision is working properly or not is by checking the data, it will help to understand which goal has already been achieved from the existing policy and which area needs reservation. For instance, in the given case the Court could have looked into the data showing the representation of the SC/ST/SEBC in the postgraduate courses in comparison to the amount of the existing population. This would have helped the Court to understand if reservation was needed or not, which was overlooked.
Overall, the decision in this case is a complex picture of balancing merit and social justice in the setting of affirmative action. The Court’s focus on the merit of the candidate is commendable but at the same time, the Court has overlooked some aspects which may trigger the traces of historical injustice that the SC/ST/SEBC candidates have faced specifically when it comes to freedom of education.
Judicial precedents shaping the case of Dr. Gulshan Prakash vs. the State of Haryana
The Court has relied on multiple cases to come to the conclusion of various issues of this case. The Court relied on Indra Sawhney vs. Union of India (1992), K. Duraisamy vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2001) and All India Institute of Medical Science Student Union vs. All India Institute of Medical Science (2001)to decide the enabling nature of Article 15(4). The Court further relied on Union of India vs. R. Rajeswaran & Another (2001) to conclude about the non-issuance of the writ of mandamus to direct the State Government to make any special provisions for SC/ST/SEBC candidates. These two were the main issues of the case that were decided by the Court with the help of the precedents.
Conclusion
The case of Dr. Gulshan Prakash vs. the State of Haryana (2009) is an important case for understanding how Article 15(4) works. This Clause lies under the domain of Fundamental Rights but does not provide any Fundamental Rights directly to the candidate of SC/ST/SEBC, instead gives power to the State to make some special provisions to provide reservations to the SC/ST/SEBC candidates that will maintain the right to equality in terms of education.
The decision of the Court emphasised the balance that is present between affirmative action and meritocracy, explaining that there should not be any structural and historical injustice faced by the SC/ST/SEBC candidates reinforced even though the mode or selection is on a merit basis. The Court discussed the discretionary power of the State under Article 15(4) and ruled that the State is the proper authority to decide whether reservation is required in the region or not, considering the empirical evidence and social realities.
However, there were some critical aspects observed in the given judgement related to the transparency and accountability of the State in decision-making. The Court even overlooked the need for a proper system which will keep a check on the misuse of the discretionary power provided to the State. Furthermore, the Court also failed to see the importance of data-driven policy-making mechanisms.
The judgement of this case is a strong call for more debate and actions, concerning the connection between equity, social justice and meritocracy in education. It focuses on how crucial it is to maintain a balance between affirmative action and merit-based selections to ensure that every candidate irrespective of his/her social identity and socioeconomic background has access to quality education.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the difference between enabling provision and compulsory provision?
The difference between enabling provision and compulsory provision determines the extent of the power of the State and the autonomy of the private organisations. Where the compulsory provision puts mandatory obligation, the enabling provision provides limited power to the State to make provisions related to any requirement that is stipulated in the Constitution. Any legislation made through enabling provision is carefully analysed to make sure it is constitutional.
What is data-driven policy making?
Data-driven policy making is a method of making policies considering the survey data, which are gathered through rigorous data analysis, data gathering and stakeholder participation, to make policies which are effective and focused. Evidence-based policy making enhances transparency and accountability in governance.
What discretionary power is given to the State under Article 15(4) of the Indian Constitution?
The discretionary power that the State holds under Article 15(4) is to make special provisions for the upliftment of socially and educationally backward classes as well as Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. This clause permits the State to make such provisions which can advance the progress of SC/ST/SEBC, however, it does not put any mandatory obligation on the State to do so. It does not create a Fundamental Right for any particular group but provides a special power to the State to enact some provisions to avoid injustice.
What is the relation between Article 15(4) and Article 16(4) of the Indian Constitution?
Right to equality is a broad spectrum under which the two Articles lie, Article 15(4) and Article 16(4). Article 15(4) provides special power to the State to enact special provisions for the SC/ST and the socially and educationally backward classes, on the other hand, Article 16(4) guarantees equality in public employment, this provides power to the State to make provisions to provide reservation to SC/ST and other backward classes in public employment. The primary objectives of both the Articles are to provide a cure for the historical injustice and to promote equality in different components of the society.
Where Article 29(2) of the Indian Constitution itself prohibits discrimination, how are affirmative actions in education made feasible by Article 15(4)?
Article 15(4) as an enabling provision takes precedence over the non-discriminatory clause of Article 29(2). Article 29(2) provides that no individual should be denied admission to any institution on the basis of his caste, race, religion, etc. On the other hand, the measure of affirmative action for the underprivileged classes or SC/ST/SEBC people is protected by Article 15(4), it allows the State to make special provisions for such underprivileged classes of people to uplift their participation and maintain equality.
In the new era of justice, recent and modern technologies grasp the space and provide ample options to make the case easy and better to interpret in various forms. As in ancient times, the evidence would be collected through witnesses or by manual work. But with the introduction of modern technology, there has been a drastic change in the field of law as well as other sectors of the economy. Forensic search is one of the inventions of the technology itself. From the beginning of this article till its end, the whole content revolves around the dynamism in the procedure of collecting evidence, how DNA transforms its journey as a study of forensic science, and how it proves to be useful for criminal investigations.
DNA
DNA, in particular, stands for “deoxyribonucleic acid.” It refers to a small, molecule-like structure containing all the information related to its genetic background. DNA is usually described as a double chain of nucleotides twisted around to create a two helix structure. It is commonly found in a cell called the nucleus of eukaryotic organisms as well as in the cytoplasm of prokaryotic organisms. It is a type of lab test being examined on every living being that covers the traits of alive individuals like hair textures, eye colour, finger impressions, and many more traits that determine the characteristics of oneself. DNA tests provide data regarding growth and development of individuals, suspicion of any virus, reproductive information, etc.
History of DNA
DNA was first identified in the late 1860s by Swiss chemist Friedrich Miescher. Later, it was recognised as the universal genetic material opened new possibilities in the field of research and development. It was first applied for the purpose of forensics in the year 1985 in an immigration dispute in the UK. The introduction of DNA technology revolutionized the field of criminal justice, and It has been technologically evolved from the discovery of DNA fingerprinting till recent times.
Genesis of DNA as an epitome of evidence
DNA plays a crucial role in the legal terminology, as in the olden days there was no such method introduced to determine the actual offenders, but with the commencement of such technology, innocent people get justice and hardened criminals get caught easily. DNA is a form of blueprint that provides information related to genetic analysis. Forensic evidence, or DNA, helps in finding accurate culprits with the help of props they have left behind. It is simply a form of biological hints of a living being.
As the DNA of two individuals cannot be the same, identical twins are just an exception to this. DNA can be collected in various forms, such as tissues, blood, semen, hair, and any form of liquid extracted from the body without having any intention to use it. The evidence left behind will be tested and examined in a way that makes it accurate in criminal investigations.
Relevance of DNA evidence
DNA is a molecule that contains known information about living creatures. DNA plays an important role in the field of proving any point and assures it as accurate and reliable evidence in the case of criminal findings. It is a part of modern technology that provides valuable insights in defining the exact and actual picture of an offence and also plays a significant part in proving it right in any criminal investigations and providing the citizens with fair justice.
With the help of DNA, sexual offences can be easily examined by taking semen samples and matching them with samples of the victim. This can lead to reliable outcomes and also aid in the delivery of fair justice. It also helps in the identification of paternity as well as maternity by taking their blood or hair samples. With the introduction of forensic science as well as DNA, it would become easier to identify the accurate evidence that matches the innocence of the case and also deliver justice to the victim in a better way by punishing the offender with relevant proof of the case.
Limitations of DNA evidence
As every concept has its pros and cons, the same applies to DNA as well. Though DNA proves to be very crucial in proving the commission of an offence, on the same side, it has its limits as well, which have been explained below, such as:
In most cases, forensic search is required, but not in every case. In some cases, the samples may become contaminated and not be present in an accurate manner, which provides fake results and cannot be relied upon, as the samples left behind unintentionally have not been sure whether they would be correct or not.
Another limitation of the DNA evidence is that the offence committed by the offender does not justify his intention just by performing a DNA test of the samples that he mistakenly left behind without knowing that these may go against him. Mensrea, an essential element of a crime, is missing and needs to be proved with the help of DNA evidence.
There are ample suspects that arise from DNA samples that do not provide reliable results. No conclusion can be drawn from DNA samples; a complete investigation is absolutely necessary.
Pitfalls on the implication of DNA evidence
There are basically two articles of the Indian Constitution related to the challenges faced due to DNA evidence. The two articles are as follows:
Article 21 of the Indian Constitution states the right to privacy.
The other one is Article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution, which states the right against self-incrimination: No person or an accused who has committed any offence has not been compelled or posted to become his own witness.
These two articles of the Indian Constitution state pitfalls while implicating DNA or forensic search as evidence to prove the commission of a crime. The articles are the fundamental rights provided to the Indian citizen that create controversy by acknowledging the citizen’s right regardless of their innocence or criminal nature. As per Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the right to privacy is given to every citizen of India and is applicable to offenders as well. It states that no person can be forced to provide the samples provided for DNA examination. Along with this, Article 20(3) also specifies that “no person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself.” These two articles coincide with the technique of forensic examination and cannot be precluded as evidence taken against legal ethics. Therefore, the samples that have been collected must meet the legal requirements and ethics to prove their evidentiary value.
Consequences of DNA evidence
There are certain factors that contribute to the outcome of DNA evidence, such as:
DNA evidence provides accurate information and also contributes trustworthy results that prove to be useful in any sector of criminal investigation. Though there are certain traditional forensic methods that can be used for criminal investigations, they are not as accurate as modern technology. DNA evidence also overcomes disputes that arise between the individuals.
In the modern scenario, there are various advancements in technology that also improve testing methodology and have expanded the efficiency of forensic search. The various innovations in the field of forensic investigations open up new techniques for delivering justice, which also ensures a perfect solution for eliminating crimes.
Relevant case laws
The renowned case laws have acted as a milestone in proving the relevance of DNA evidence in the field of criminal investigations.
Gautam Kundu vs. State of West Bengal (1993): The case amplifies the perfect understanding of the extent of Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and Article 20(3) of the Indian Constitution also connects with this case, as under this no individual can be compelled or forced to provide their body samples to carry on the DNA process as it is against the fundamental principle.
Rajli Rajjo vs. Kapoor Singh and Ors. (2013): This case was decided by the Punjab and Haryana High Court, in which a criminal investigation was going on, and evidence had been collected from the crime scene. The DNA samples were helpful as a blueprint to prove the innocence of the accused.
Javed Rehman Shaikh vs. State of Maharashtra (2021): This case is a perfect example to clarify the relevance of DNA testing methodology. In this case, samples of nail clippings as well as blood samples were collected to match the samples, and the offender was caught with the help of the same.
Conclusion
The consequence drawn from the above article is that DNA evidence or proofs generated out of modern techniques provide useful insights in serving fair justice to citizens and also contribute towards criminal examinations. Evidence acts as a blueprint in every investigation to prove the right person guilty of committing an offence and provide justice to the victim of the case as well. DNA evidence revolves around the criminal investigations to come to the exact point. With the innovation of new technology, wrongdoers get caught easily, and the technology also provides accurate results so that fair outcomes are generated.
When we hear the word real estate, one wonders if the person holding tall buildings, towers, apartments, malls, and commercial and residential complexes might be rich. But this illusion is far from reality. Let me tell you exactly how it intends to mingle with the real estate business and market operational functions. The real estate market has a nexus in both the private and public sectors. The agenda is to maximise the opportunities for developers, investors, and lenders and minimise the risk. The real estate assessment is a process that provides crucial information regarding predevelopment, acquisition, further development, marketing, and disposition of property. Real estate offers various products, such as apartment buildings, offices, and warehouses. These products are evaluated based on their location, area, site, layout, project amenities, services, and prices or rents. It may cover single land use or multiple property benefits. For example, hotel projects like luxury resort properties, conference halls, banquet halls, etc. Retail projects like regional malls, shopping malls, etc. Housing projects like single family, apartments, for sale, or rentals. Industrial projects like big warehouses, laboratory research, cold storage, office space, factories, etc.
Understanding how the real estate market operates
To initiate the start of any proposed project, a realtor does a significant study of market analysis like assessment, demographic challenge, topography, vegetation, footfall of people, feasibility, layout and structure, competitors in nearby areas, surveys, psychographic research, focus groups, and pricing. The estimate revolves around assessment, market planning, and the implementation of public strategies.
Developers perform the overview assessment on the parcel or whole piece of land, which determines the disadvantages and advantages of a proposed project and is often supported by the required data. The given output generally covers the location’s advantages, drawbacks, and method of usage that would be appropriate and further provides guidelines on rent or price range that could be achieved in sustained market conditions.
Market investigation or market analysis, is the next step the developer looks for. It is vital to ascertain the core assumptions that are used by developers for the financial feasibility of the proposed project. For instance, rents and prices can be achieved on accrued land, if there is any need for extra income for the project. Any modifications, upgrades, changes in layout, soil testing, or resource availability required thereon. Forecasting cash flows & return on investment and how it can produce more effective results. And also predicting the bottom line if the market crashes.
Public Relation Strategies – It is significant to note that realtors/developers perform relations campaigns like advertising & marketing, event planning, media relations, and social media rapport building to enhance real estate public relations. One of the important factors for establishing public strategies is press releases. The press releases are often used to tell something about the company’s status, new projects, new services, and improvising brand image (as they expand the knowledge of the company in public – for instance, objectives to be achieved). Consistency in press releases from time to time helps the public recognise the company name.
Why is it necessary to do a market assessment in real estate
There are many types of market studies followed up with multiple reasons to do so. The following are the reasons:
Provide a glance at the proposed project
The developer will undergo the market study along with supportive data attached to it. He will determine the rents or prices in a given market condition. He can seek to hire a land planner to examine how units can be implemented, and what traffic they are going to attract. And how to accommodate the environmental conditions.
Financial stability for the proposed project
The results driven by market analysis help the developer analyse how much finance is needed for the project. Whether the desired objectives can be achieved in proposed rents or prices or if any additional income is required. Sustaining the marginal cash flows or return on investment. Generally, it also depicts the worst-case scenario if the market crashes.
Potential of a new product in an unproven location
To meet current demand, existing real estate properties have to make changes. For example, 20 years ago, environmentally friendly features were not considered essential things that were too costly for maintenance. But, now the public wants to reside in environmentally friendly spaces, community halls, shopping malls, transportation, usable open space, schools, and health care. The developer can either create a new one or make changes to the existing building.
Equity investors, government funds, or debt financing
The people who are investing in real estate projects want a piece of solid evidence that the developer’s expectations can meet all the requirements of investors. The proposed project is going to attract a return on investment and provide good returns. The investor or government secretly tests the market analysis project to safeguard their funds from misuse.
More marketable product
Understanding the characteristics and demands of market studies helps to design a fine product. For example, the analyst person should take active participation in preliminary planning, including land planners, civil engineers, architects, traffic consultants, financial analysts, public relations specialists, and attorneys. To ensure the successful completion of a project, the developer must consult them.
Private development
With the help of community support, some projects can proceed without approval or assistance from the government. While evaluating the project, officials, local staff and consultants focus on design, traffic & density. However, the developers who are seeking public subsidy for the project are required to submit a report of market study & finance usage.
Economic development planning
There are government agencies that also monitor the real estate market. At every level, the government has a vested interest in the land owned by people to acknowledge property tax collections effectively. For the welfare of society, the government makes frequent developments to enhance the tax base, business, or workforce housing. Often, these government bodies diligently check all the dos and don’ts before issuing them tax credits or bonds.
Who uses the market assessment report of real estate
The early process of market study triggers the development of ideas and is a great device to control risk. Following is the list of people who make use of market assessment:
Developer- These people are frequent users of market studies. Basically, it is used during the pre-development process when applying for finance.
Whether the location is suitable
Identify a mix of products that are best for the market
Guidance for land planners
Suggest projects, pricing, and cash flows
Government officials- For collecting tax benefits from developers, the public sector has its nexus in covering all areas, such as metropolitan, industrial, and business sites in small districts or proposed development sites.
The officials do the market study to understand the community, region, and reasonableness of housing.
Ensuring housing needs and possible locations for new construction should be encouraged.
Provide effective support for redeveloping proposed project plans
Expansion for utility service areas like parking space, management of traffic
Construction of houses near schools
Fiscal impact of the proposed project for negotiating the monetary management and fees.
Compatibility with state and central grant requirements
Targeting market niches like an artist studio, artist housing
Providing information on prices or rents
Investors and lenders- The results driven from the cash flow chart tell the lender whether the proposed project can cover all the debt services and also tell the investor what he could expect as a return on investment. People like equity investors, corporate investors, and limited partners do a rigorous study before accepting the loan applications of developers. Before finalising, the investors & lenders ask the market analyst’s opinion on the current status of the market.
Do proposed buyers and tenants exist in the locality in sufficient numbers to attract the proposed project?
Whether the project is on lease?
What are the rents or prices in the competitive market?
Tenants & buyers- These people also often prefer market research before signing the contract or extension of the lease and hire an independent market analyst who helps them decide the effective market usage of the proposed project. The managers of corporate real estate find the advantages of location in different areas or examine the suitability of the site before purchasing or considering the lease.
Market investigation in real estate
Developers sometimes go through an undervaluation of the market. As the project proceeds forward, they realise they have other vital fees to pay the professionals, like architects and engineers, at a minimal stage so their plans can get approved. Market objectives cannot be achieved with an illusionary vision; they must be backed up by some experts and consultants to make the project impact realistic. More importantly, the study objectives, hiring experts or consultants, and the complexity of the research all come with huge costs.
A developer, lender, investor, or government agency hires an expert or consultant who can do the market investigation strategically before the approval of the proposed project. The following are the key factors taken into consideration:
Land use- To refrain from using single-use property, the developer goes for a multipurpose project. For example, a residential complex may have rental or sale components. A multipurpose project involves office space, hotels, and the need to collect employment data for that region. For instance, both skilled and unskilled workers are needed during the continuation of real estate projects. If the project is large, then two or more consultants may carry out the market research. However, multi-purpose projects are riskier than single-use properties because, out of 4 businesses, one or two may not work out entirely.
In detail report- In the initial stages, a glance report is needed of that local area, for example, the geographical location, demographic challenges, and key characteristics of competition therein, which helps to improve the ideas of the project and how they can outperform others. This report will be forwarded to investors or lenders for further implementation of a methodology to compete with the existing demand segment.
Experience of a market analyst- If the developer hires a senior consultant, he may ask for expensive fees. However, it is far better than hiring junior people, who are inexperienced in real estate projects Senior consultants would be familiar with all aspects of the project and make recommendations and reviews of investors.
Filed work expenses- As the market investigation isn’t a one day assessment, it requires a lot of travel fees to analyse the little things. Mostly, the consultant should be from a nearby location and know all the ground realities of the proposed project.
Buying data from faithful resources- Purchasing software or inside market data from a private vendor can save a lot of money and time. Manual collection of data can cost up to thousands and lakhs of rupees, depending on the nature of the project.
Premium amount- A developer who hires a consultant will pay a premium amount as per agreed terms between them. The consultant may need the help of outside support to get his job done on time.
RERA Act- Section 35 of the Real Estate Regulatory Act of 2016 prescribes the investigation powers of developers. Under this, RERA has the power to conduct an inquiry and investigate the promoters, allottees, or real estate agents as and when required.
To safeguard the interests of buyers and tenants, RERA has the same powers mentioned in Section 30 of the Civil Procedure Code of 1908. The following are
Discovery and production of books of account- To avoid financial irregularities in books of account, the Authority of RERA can direct developers to show accounts in relation to the project. The developer has to comply with the order; otherwise, failing to do so, the authority can appoint a commission to search for books of accounts.
Examining the witnesses on oath – The authority of RERA can summon any person to examine on oath. As in the real estate business, there are multiple agreements like agreements for sale, memorandum of understanding, lease agreements, etc. The authority can direct the person to submit the report on an affidavit.
Issue Commission for the Examination of Witnesses or documents – Many times, a developer may ask for unconditional/ irrevocable consent to make any alterations to the project. In such cases, the person can file a complaint under Section 31 for violations of the contract.
Summon & enforce the attendance of persons – The authority can ask them to present in person before the court on a trial date & examine them on oath.
Public relations strategies in real estate
The real estate business has very fierce competition. Most real estate companies are now using PR campaigns to build public relations. To promote the brand image of the company, they have heavily focused on real estate marketing plans.
Press releases- To generate leads, it is an incredible procedure. The press release is a powerful and effective way to attract clients and increase the chance of getting noticed. The companies write direct blogs, letters, or story-worthy pieces and own websites, which make them unique for their audience.
Targeting a particular niche- In this, the developer mainly focuses on a limited audience. Suppose he has a four-floor building with him, which he wants to either lease or rent out. Primarily, the target audience is small business enterprises like parlours, tailoring, boutiques, commercial banks, coaching centres, etc.
Email campaign- An attractive email campaign with a perfect subject line helps 70 percent of people open the email and explore the website. Features like newsletters, subscribing to the website, daily updates, and exciting offers create a trust and strong image in their minds.
Website- A genuine website with astonishing pictures or videos of beautiful properties compels potential clients to take action and call the developer.
SEO and content- SEO and content marketing help guide the buyer and tenant to know about the options that are available in the proposed project, like office space, parking, and gardens. A hassle-free process and a payment blog will help them create a brand image for real estate and build trust. Showcasing the reviews of previous clients is an awesome way to attract multiple buyers.
Social media- Collaborating with influencers is a great way to reach a large audience. The participation on social media strategically plans out the best results of the proposed project. YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, etc. influencers assist the public in knowing about the details and description of the property.
Offline media to attract a larger market- Newspapers, hoarding, and pamphlets are also all great ways of advertising and marketing.
Laws for real estate sector in India
The Indian real estate sector is governed by a complex web of laws, regulations, and policies. These laws aim to facilitate the smooth functioning of the sector, protect the interests of stakeholders, and promote sustainable development. Some of the key laws and regulations governing the real estate sector in India include:
The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA)
The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA), is a landmark legislation enacted by the Indian Parliament to regulate and promote the real estate sector in India. The Act aims to protect the interests of homebuyers, ensure transparency and accountability in real estate transactions, and boost investments in the sector.
Key provisions of RERA
Registration of real estate projects: All ongoing and new real estate projects, with a minimum plot area of 500 square meters or eight apartments must be registered with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) established in each state.
Mandatory disclosures: Developers are required to disclose all relevant project details, including land title documents, approvals, and project plans, on the RERA website. This information must be updated regularly to keep buyers informed.
Escrow account: Developers must deposit 70% of the project funds in a separate escrow account dedicated to the construction costs of the project. This measure ensures that project funds are utilised for the intended purpose and prevents diversion of funds.
Timely completion: Developers must adhere to the timelines specified in the project registration document. In case of delays, developers are liable to pay interest to homebuyers as per the RERA Act.
Consumer protection: Homebuyers have the right to file complaints with the RERA Authority against developers for any violations of the Act. The Authority has the power to adjudicate disputes and impose penalties on developers.
Transparency and accountability: RERA mandates developers to provide regular updates on project progress, including photographs and videos, on the RERA website. This transparency measure enables homebuyers to monitor the construction status and hold developers accountable.
The implementation of RERA has brought about significant changes in the Indian real estate sector. It has restored confidence among homebuyers, reduced project delays, and improved the overall transparency and accountability of real estate transactions. As a result, the sector has witnessed increased investments and a renewed focus on quality and timely project delivery.
The Transfer of Property Act, 1882
This Act governs the transfer of ownership of immovable property in India.
It provides a comprehensive framework for various types of property transfers, including sale, gift, and mortgage.
The Act lays down the essential elements of a valid transfer, such as the intention to transfer, the capacity of the parties involved, and the consideration (if any).
It also prescribes the formalities required for a valid transfer, such as the execution and registration of the property documents.
The Transfer of Property Act plays a crucial role in ensuring the legality and enforceability of property transfers in India.
The Indian Contract Act, 1872
This Act governs contracts in India, including contracts for the sale and purchase of real estate.
It provides the legal framework for the formation, interpretation, and enforcement of contracts.
The Act defines essential elements of a valid contract, such as offer, acceptance, consideration, and legality of object.
It also deals with issues such as breach of contract and remedies for breach.
The Indian Contract Act is fundamental to understanding the legal aspects of real estate transactions and ensuring the rights and obligations of the parties involved.
The Income Tax Act, 1961
This Act governs the taxation of income from real estate.
It provides the framework for calculating taxable income, including rental income, capital gains from property sales, and other income related to real estate investments.
The Act specifies various deductions and exemptions available to taxpayers, such as interest on home loans and depreciation on property.
It also prescribes the rates of income tax applicable to different income slabs.
Understanding the provisions of the Income Tax Act is crucial for real estate investors to optimise their tax liability and comply with legal requirements.
The Stamp Act, 1899
This Act governs the stamping of documents related to the transfer of immovable property.
It requires the payment of stamp duty on certain documents, such as sale deeds, gift deeds, and leases.
The stamp duty varies from state to state and is typically a percentage of the property’s value.
The Stamp Act ensures that property transfers are duly documented and authenticated, providing legal validity and enforceability.
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
This Act empowers the government to acquire private land for public purposes.
It provides for the payment of compensation to landowners whose land is acquired.
The Act specifies the procedures for land acquisition, including the assessment of compensation, the right to challenge the acquisition, and the resettlement and rehabilitation of affected persons.
The Land Acquisition Act plays a crucial role in balancing the need for public infrastructure development with the rights of individual landowners.
The Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976
This Act imposes a ceiling on the ownership of urban land.
It aims to prevent the concentration of land in a few hands and promote the equitable distribution of land.
The Act specifies the maximum area of land that an individual or entity can own in urban areas.
It also provides for the regulation of land use and the development of urban areas.
The Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act seeks to address issues of land scarcity and ensure a more equitable distribution of urban land resources.
These are just some of the key laws governing the real estate sector in India. These laws play a vital role in regulating the sector, protecting the interests of stakeholders, and promoting sustainable development.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the real estate market operates within a dynamic framework that involves a thorough understanding of market conditions, demographics, and financial feasibility. Market assessment plays a pivotal role in guiding developers, investors, lenders, and government officials in making informed decisions regarding project viability and potential returns. The multifaceted nature of real estate products, ranging from residential to commercial and industrial sectors, necessitates a comprehensive market investigation to ensure success.
Market studies are crucial for developers to determine project suitability, financial stability, and the potential of a new product in a given location. Government officials rely on market assessments to collect tax benefits, encourage housing development, and plan for economic growth. Investors and lenders scrutinise market reports to gauge the feasibility of returns on investment, while tenants and buyers use them to make informed decisions. Market investigation involves careful consideration of factors such as land usage, detailed reports, the experience of market analysts, fieldwork expenses, and compliance with regulatory authorities like RERA.
In the competitive landscape of real estate, effective public relations strategies, including press releases, targeted niche marketing, email campaigns, a strong online presence, and collaborations with influencers, are essential for building a brand image and attracting potential clients. Offline media, such as newspapers and hoardings, also contribute to broader market visibility. In essence, the success of any real estate venture hinges on a well-informed market assessment and strategic public relations initiatives.
This article is written by Aarushi Mittal. The article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the case of D.A.V. College Trust and Management Society v. Director of Public Instructions (2019). It discusses in brief the Right to Information Act, 2005, and examines in detail various aspects and intricacies of this judgement.
Table of Contents
Introduction
The Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter mentioned as the “RTI Act”) is responsible for promoting transparency and accountability in the working of government bodies and resisting corruption in our government system. These bodies are further defined under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act as “public authorities”. In D.A.V. College Trust and Management Society v. Director of Public Instructions (2019), the Court addressed the issue of whether the definition of “public authority” under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act, 2005 includes Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) in its ambit. A division bench of the Supreme Court decided this matter, thereby widening the scope of the RTI Act and holding bodies such as NGOs substantially financed by the appropriate government responsible for furnishing information under the Act. Essentially, the Court broadened the definition of “public authority” under the RTI Act by giving people the right to access information pertaining to these organisations, thereby upholding the principal objectives of the RTI Act and the fundamental rights of citizens.
Details of the case
Name of the case: D.A.V. College Trust and Management Society v. Director of Public Instructions
Citation: AIR 2019 SC 4411
Name of the Appellants: D.A.V. College Trust and Management Society, New Delhi, and the appellant parties of the three cases on appeal: D.A.V. College, Chandigarh, M.C.M. D.A.V College, Chandigarh, and D.A.V. Senior Secondary School, Chandigarh.
Name of the Defendant: Director of Public Instructions and Ors.
Date of judgement: 17th September 2019.
Name of the court: The Supreme Court of India
Bench: Justice Deepak Gupta and Justice Aniruddha Bose.
Right to Information Act, 2005
Before delving into the case in detail, it is first pertinent to know about the RTI Act. The RTI Act was adopted in 2005. It was passed by both houses of Parliament and received the President’s assent on 15 June 2005. In the landmark case of Raj Narain v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1975), the Supreme Court held that the right to information was a fundamental right under Article 19(1) of the Constitution. It further ruled that the people of the country had the right to know about the workings of the government. The Act serves as an essential tool for the exercise of such rights and enables individuals to question the workings of various government bodies. It promotes transparency and accountability in government functioning by requiring government bodies to furnish information about their operations and work. It attempts to counter corruption and imposes penalties on non-complying government bodies.
Under the RTI Act, citizens can seek any information that the government is able to disclose to Parliament. The Act ensures that public authorities disclose information and specifies the time frame within which the disclosure is to be made as well as the procedure to be followed for such disclosure. It sets up information commissions at the state and central levels through which access to such information is provided to citizens. These public authorities are also required to maintain records as per Chapter II of the said Act. However, Section 8 of the Act lays down the information that is exempted from disclosure, such as any information prejudicial to the sovereignty and integrity of India or that pertains to the security, economic, scientific, or strategic interests of the state.
Section 2(h) of the RTI Act defines the expression “public authority” to “mean any authority, body, or institution of self-government that is established or constituted:
(c) by any other law made by the State Legislature;
(d) by notification issued or order passed by the appropriate government;
and includes any
(i) a body owned, controlled, or substantially financed;
(ii) non-government organisation substantially financed, directly or indirectly, by funds provided by the appropriate government”.
The applicability of the provisions of the RTI Act extends only to those bodies that fall under the above-mentioned definition of “public authority.”
Facts of the case
In the present case, a civil petition was brought before the Supreme Court by D.A.V. College Trust and Management Society, New Delhi, D.A.V. College, Chandigarh, M.C.M.D.A.V. College, Chandigarh, and D.A.V. Senior Secondary School, Chandigarh. These institutions, both schools and colleges, were established by the D.A.V. College Trust and Management Society, which was responsible for managing and running many such independent colleges and schools.
These institutions were initially receiving financial aid of up to 95 percent from the Union territory of Chandigarh, which was later reduced to 45 percent. They were asked to furnish information relating to the annual fee structure for various educational programmes, classes, scholarship programs, diplomas, add-on courses offered by them, and other such information pertaining to college admissions under the RTI Act. The appellants claimed that these institutions, being NGOs, could not fall under the ambit of “public authorities” defined under Section 2(h) of the RTI Act and therefore were not subject to its provisions. They argued that the RTI Act was only applicable to “government and its instrumentalities” as defined in the Section, and thus the proceedings initiated against them by the Director of Public Instructions under the RTI Act were not valid. Further, since these institutions were not receiving financial aid amounting to more than 50 percent, they were not “substantially funded” by the government.
Issues raised in the case
Whether NGOs substantially funded by the government fall under the purview of Section 2(h) of the RTI Act; and
Whether the appellants in this case were substantially funded by the government.
Arguments of the parties
Appellants
The appellants contended that, as per the words of Section 2(h), only those “authorities, bodies, or institutions” that were in fact concerned with self-government were public authorities. They argued that the objective of the Act was to cover only those government bodies and instrumentalities within its scope that were accountable to the government. The appellants claimed that no body, authority, or institution that was outside the ambit of clauses (a) to (c) of Section 2(h) could be held to be a “public authority” except if a notification was issued by the appropriate government authority as under clause (d). Further, they claimed that there were four types of “public authority” as mentioned in the section, namely,
Those set up by the Constitution, or
Bodies established by an Act of Parliament, or
An authority formed as a result of a law made by the State Legislature, or
A body established by a notification issued by the relevant government authority.
The appellants argued that outside of these four types, no other body could be considered a public authority, and, therefore, since the appellants did not fall under these categories, they could not be termed as public authorities. Moreover, they contended that the bodies concerned in the present case were not “substantially financed” by the government.
Respondents
The respondents contended that, as per the wording of Section 2(h) taken in consonance with its four clauses, it also specifically included all those bodies that were “owned, controlled, or substantially financed and non-governmental organisations substantially financed directly or indirectly by the government”. Thus, they submitted that the appellant bodies were well within the scope of public authority.
Furthermore, the respondents argued that the documents presented before the Court showed that the funds granted to these institutions by the Union territory of Chandigarh amounted to nearly half of the institutions’ total expenses. Moreover, approximately 95 percent of the salaries of the institution’s teaching and non-teaching staff were generated from government funds. Therefore, the respondents argued that it could be reasonably inferred that the appellant bodies were substantially financed by the appropriate government.
Judgement in D.A.V. College Trust and Management Society & Ors. vs. Director of Public Instructions & Ors. (2019)
Justice Deepak Gupta, after examining the relevant parts of the RTI Act and considering both sides’ arguments, drafted the judgement for Justice Aniruddha Bose and himself. The primary question before the Court was whether NGOs substantially financed by the appropriate government authority fell under the scope of “public authority” defined in Section 2(h) of the RTI Act. Further, the Court was to determine whether the appellants were such NGOs “substantially financed”.
By examining various judicial precedents and applying the principle of purposive construction, the Court held that NGOs and the bodies mentioned in sub-clauses (i) and (ii) in the second part of the definition are to be included in addition to the four categories listed in the first part of the Section. Thus, NGOs substantially financed, directly or indirectly, by the appropriate government authority would be a “public authority” as per the relevant provisions of the RTI Act. Appellant No. 1 was found to be receiving government grants amounting to about 44 percent of the entire college’s expenditure. Further, 95 percent of the salary of its teaching staff was being borne by the state government. It was observed that teaching was the most important function of the organisation, essential to its functioning, and therefore, such funding would be considered substantial. Thus, the Court held the body to be substantially financed and a public authority within the meaning of Section 2(h) of the Act.
With regard to the other appellants, the Supreme Court found that the High Court erred by not taking into consideration whether the bodies were “substantially financed” or not. Accordingly, the appeals were remitted to the High Court to determine the same.
Precedents referred to in the case
The Court began by examining the definition of “public authority” as interpreted by this Court. The Court referred to Thalappalam Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. & Ors. v. State of Kerala & Ors. (2013), where the Registrar of Cooperative Societies issued a notification declaring that all cooperative societies fell within the purview of the RTI Act. The said notification was challenged before this Court, which, while examining the definition of “public authority” in Section 2(h), decided on the issue of whether cooperative societies were “public authorities”. It was observed that in cases where the definition of a term intends to “mean” something, it is to be construed in a narrow and strict sense. However, when the same definition uses the word “includesʼʼ the definition intends to be interpreted in a wide and exhaustive manner. The meanings of the terms “means” and “includes” have been thoroughly explained by the Court in DDA v. Bhola Nath Sharma (2010). Whenever these terms (“means” and “includes”) are used in an Act or statute, they hold a specific meaning within the context of such Act that is invariably prescribed. Thus, the Court held that it was a settled rule of interpretation of the law that whenever the words `means and includes” are provided in the definition clause, both words are given equal importance and neither can override the other.
Further, in P. Kasilingam v. P.S.G. College of Technology & Ors. (1995), the Supreme Court, while interpreting “means and includes”, had observed that the word “means” in a section indicated that the definition was clear, precise, and exhaustive. Whereas “includes” was used by the legislature to widen the scope of the definition to ensure it was not interpreted strictly. The Supreme Court cited similar judgments given by the courts on this issue, namely, Bharat Co-operative Bank (Mumbai) Ltd. v. Co-operative Bank Employees Union (2007)andDelhi Development Authority v. Bhola Nath Sharma (Dead) by L.Rs. & Ors. (2011). It was noticed by the Court that, in P. Kasilingam, the phrase “means and includes” was used in the section, whereas, in the present case, they have not been used together. The first part of sub-section 2(h) has the word “means” and the second part uses the word “and includes any”. This was observed to expand the definition to cover bodies other than those mentioned in clauses (a) to (d) of Section 2(h). Therefore, the Court ruled that NGOs and the bodies mentioned in sub-clauses (i) and (ii) in the second part of the definition are to be included in addition to the four categories listed in the first part of the Section. By inserting an inclusive clause into the definition, the legislature intended to broaden the definition of “public authority” to include anybody “owned, controlled, or substantially financed by the government” and NGOs substantially financed by the government. Such a body may not be constituted by an Act of Parliament or State Legislature, by the Constitution, or by a notification issued in that regard.
Moreover, while dealing with the appellants’ argument that the colleges and schools are not substantially financed, the Court referred to the Thalappam case, wherein it had made multiple observations on this matter. Here, the Court noted that the word “substantial” was defined in Black’s Law Dictionary to mean “of real worth and importance” or “of considerable value”. Similarly, “substantially” is defined to mean “in substance” as a substantial thing. It was observed that “substantially” was not a synonym of the word “majority” but was closer in meaning to “material or important”.The Court concluded that merely providing grants, privileges, subsidiaries, etc. could not be considered “substantial funding” unless there is a record to show the contrary. Essentially, unless it can be shown that the body practically runs on such funding and, without the same, the body would fail to carry out its operations, such grants, subsidiaries, or privileges are not automatically deemed to constitute “substantial funding”. Furthermore, the state often introduces schemes that provide financial support or guarantees in the interest of public welfare, and such assistance and schemes provided to bodies or institutions could not be termed substantial funding. The Court held that substantial meant a large portion, which did not necessarily mean a majority part or greater than 50 percent. It was ruled that there could not be a fixed rule, and the same was to be decided based on the facts and circumstances of the case.
Rationale behind the judgement
By applying the principle of purposive construction of a statute, the Court placed itself in the chair of the legislature, or the author of the statute. The principle requires the provision to be construed in a manner that ensures that the object of the Act is achieved. When the language of the statute is clear, the court cannot be permitted to give its own interpretation. However, in cases of ambiguity in the language of the statute, the court is to refer to the objects and reasons provided in the statute and find out the meaning interpreted by the drafters of such a provision. The Court referred to its previous decisions in the cases of New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Nusli Neville Wadia & Anr. (2008)and Abhiram Singh v. C.D. Commachen (Dead) by L.Rs & Ors. (1996) that discussed the principle of purposive construction of a statute in detail.Accordingly, the Supreme Court interpreted the provisions in question as per the purpose of the statute and the intention of the legislators and ruled that NGOs substantially financed, directly or indirectly, by the appropriate government authority would be a “public authority” as per the relevant provisions of the RTI Act.
Furthermore, it was observed by the Court that NGOs were not defined by the RTI Act or any other statute but were described as bodies “legally constituted but non-governmental in nature”. These bodies were established by natural or legal entities with no involvement or representation from the government. Thus, the Court observed that colleges and schools would form part of such a definition. The Court further explained that even those organisations that were partially or completely funded by the government could be defined as NGOs if they were administered independently and did not include any government representation. Even a society that is neither owned nor controlled by the government could be an NGO, if it is substantially financed, either directly or indirectly, by the government, as it would fall under sub-clause (ii) of Section 2(h).
Having established the above, the Bench thereafter examined the meaning of the expression “substantially financed”. It defined the term “substantial” to mean a large portion but not necessarily a major portion or more than 50 percent. Substantial financing may be direct or indirect. To explain the same, the Court considered certain examples. If, in a city, a piece of land is given free of charge or at a considerable discount to any educational institution, hospital, or other body, such a body may be considered to be substantially funded. Essentially, if the very existence of such an institution or body is dependent on it receiving land at a cheaper rate, the body is said to be “substantially financed”. Thus, no blanket rule could be laid down in this regard and had to be decided based on the facts on a case-by-case basis. There may be a case where the funding provided is more than 50 percent, but it may not be considered “substantially financed”. For instance, in the case of a small NGO with a total capital of Rs.10,000, it receives monetary assistance from the government amounting to Rs.5000. Here, although the government funding is 50 percent, it cannot be termed “substantial”. Similarly, a body may be “substantially financed”, although the amount of funding is less than 50 percent. For instance, if an NGO receives hundreds of crores of rupees as a grant, even though such an amount is less than 50 percent, the body is considered to be “substantially financed”.
The Court found that whether the body, organisation, or NGO was able to carry out its activities effectively in the absence of financial assistance from the government would be an important consideration in deciding whether the authority may be “substantially financed”. Keeping in mind that the RTI Act was enacted with the objective of ensuring transparency in public dealings and that citizens have the right to know about the source of funding and the operations taking place within these bodies, any NGO, body, or institution receiving substantial funding from the government would be liable to comply with the provisions of the Act. In light of all of the above, the Court began examining each of the cases independently. The Court observed the following:
Appellant No. 1 received government grants amounting to about 44 percent of the college’s expenditure.
With regards to the college and the school, the funding from the state was around 40 percent and 44 percent, respectively, of the total expenditure for each year.
Further, 95 percent of the salaries of both the teaching and non-teaching staff of the college are borne by the state government. The remaining expenses borne by the college were with respect to hostels, etc.
The Court also noted that teaching serves as a significant function of colleges as opposed to other expenses, such as hostels, infrastructure, etc.
These were considered to be substantial payments, and they were also seen to have increased substantially over the years. Therefore, it was held that these colleges and schools were held to be “substantially financed” and are public authorities within the meaning of Section 2(h) of the RTI Act.
Conclusion
Under the RTI Act, public authorities are required to make certain disclosures regarding their structure and various aspects of their functioning. Such disclosures sought by citizens ensure transparency and accountability in their operations. The judgement gives a wide interpretation of the definition of “public authority” under the RTI Act. It includes within its scope all organisations or bodies that receive substantial financial assistance from the appropriate government authority, thereby expanding the scope of bodies that fall within the ambit of the Act. This, in turn, expands access to information for citizens, furthering the intentions and objectives of the RTI Act.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Is the right to information a fundamental right?
The right to information is a fundamental right that allows every citizen access to information from public bodies and authorities. It is a component of Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. In State of Uttar Pradesh v. Raj Narain (1975), the Supreme Court explicitly directed public bodies to make all the necessary information accessible and available for the citizens of this country. Following this verdict, the right to information was granted the status of a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India, along with the right to freedom of speech and expression.
Who is eligible to file an RTI application?
Only an Indian citizen can request information under the RTI Act. They must provide their name, address, and other required details to access the information.
Are there any laws that provide for the non-disclosure of information?
There are certain laws and provisions, apart from those mentioned in the RTI Act, that allow the non-disclosure of the requested information. Sections 123, 124, and 162 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, specify the conditions under which the information can be kept concealed. According to these laws, the respective authorities and officials can deny the requested information. Additionally, the Official Secrets Act, 1923, also provides for information to be withheld and labelled as a secret.
Where is an RTI application filed?
An RTI application can be filed online or sent via post.
Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:
The article is written by Clara D’costa. This article discusses the case of Yamanaji H. Jadhav vs. Nirmala AIR (2012) in detail, including the issues raised, arguments of the parties, judgement and the rationale behind the judgement. The article also speaks about the legal provisions for granting customary divorce and how the courts interpret the same. This article talks about the valid requisites of a customary divorce, and the legal procedures to obtain a customary divorce under Hindu law.
Table of Contents
Introduction
The Hindu Law places marriage in a higher regard and considers it to be a holy sacrament. Divorce is the end of a marriage, according to the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. It is stated that for the interest of society, the sacrament of marriage shall be protected by certain provisions so as to maintain the seriousness of the marital relation. Divorce is only allowed in serious cases where there are no other options. The provisions related to divorce under Hindu Law were first established in the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
There are a few rules about when a spouse can get a divorce or appeal for dissolution of marriage in a court of law that are included in the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. In the case of Yamanaji H. Jadhav v. Nirmala (2002), the husband seeking a divorce from his wife is accused of physically torturing his wife and fraudulently taking her signature on the divorce deed.
However, this case travelled from the doors of the Trial Court to the High Court to finally the Supreme Court, wherein it was sent back to the Trial Court. The main legal aspect of this case is the “customary divorce” that the Trial Court granted without an enquiry to check its validity and thus, the Supreme Court called for a fresh start to the case. Let us have a look into what went down in this case.
Details of the case
Case name: Yamanaji H. Jadhav v. Nirmala
Bench: Justice N. Santosh Hegde and Justice Doraiswamy Raju
Type of case: Civil appeal
Appeal no.: 4969 of 1998 in the Supreme Court of India.
Date of the judgement: 1st February, 2002
Equivalent Citations: AIR 2002 SC 971, 2002 (2) SCC 637, 2002 AIR SCW 674
The legal matter of Yamanaji H. Jadhav v. Nirmala, as documented in AIR 2002 SC 971, involves a dispute between husband and wife that was brought before the Supreme Court in the year 1998. Yamanaji H. Jadhav, the appellant, and Nirmala, the respondent, were the key individuals involved in this legal battle.
Customs have been a significant part of Indian law, thereby aiding this judgement to determine the validity of divorce under the customary divorce of the respective community. Yamanaji H. Jadhav, the appellant, brought this case before the Supreme Court, seeking justice and a fair resolution to the matter at hand.
The Trial Court granted the judgement in the husband’s favour but upon appeal, the High Court reversed the decision of the Trial Court, offering sympathy and judgement in favour of the plaintiff, i.e., the wife.
Facts of Yamanaji H. Jadhav vs. Nirmala
The respondent-plaintiff in the Trial Court stated that their marriage was solemnised on 26th May 1978, following which they had been living together as husband and wife. The respondent-plaintiff stated that she was continuously mistreated by her husband, which took a toll on her physical and mental health.
This resulted in her being admitted to the hospital for treatment against the physical and mental trauma. It was stated by the respondent-plaintiff that, at one stage, unable to bear the sufferings from the respondent’s end, the appellant had attempted suicide but was saved by her neighbours.
The appellant-defendant, Yamanaji H. Jadhav, had then filed for a matrimonial suit in the year 1979 for divorce, which thereafter came to be compromised. However, their relationship worsened as Yamanaji H. Jadhav consistently demanded a divorce from his wife, Nirmala. She was ultimately sent to her maternal home, because of which she was forced to file a petition for maintenance. Her father then made an application under Section 97 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and they claimed that the respondent had forcibly confined her.
The respondent was then under threat and coercion made to sign a document without her knowledge of the document being a divorce deed at the office of the Sub-Registrar. Further, when it came to her knowledge that the document was in fact a divorce deed, the appellant filed a suit in Principle Munsif, Bijapur, for cancellation of the same.
Prior proceedings
The appellant in this appeal had been a defendant before the Principle Munsif Bijapur in the Original Suit No.156 of the year 1982, requisitioning a cancellation and declaration of the divorce deed executed on 26th June 1982 on the grounds that it was obtained by coercion and threat. The respondent in this appeal, Nirmala, had filed a suit in the Trial Court for the cancellation of the divorce deed and stated that it was obtained under fraud, threat and coercion by Yamanaji H. Jadhav.
The respondent-plaintiff, Nirmala, had contended that the appellant-defendant had ill-treated her throughout the course of their marriage and had caused immense mental and physical stress to her.
However, contrary to the statements made by the respondent-plaintiff, the appellant stated in his written statement that the allegations raised by the respondent-plaintiff were false. He admitted to being married to the respondent-plaintiff on May 26, 1978 but denied ill-treating or forcing the plaintiff to grant him a divorce.
The appellant-defendant, Yamanaji H. Jadhav, further stated that it was the plaintiff who actually deserted him and granted him a divorce and, hence, the divorce deed in question was executed by her of her own free will.
The Trial Court concluded that the plaintiff failed to establish her allegations that her signature on the divorce deed was obtained by undue influence and coercion and, thus, dismissed the lawsuit filed by Nirmala, the plaintiff-respondent.
The findings of the Trial Court were further affirmed by the First Appellate Court. This led her to file an appeal in the High Court of Bombay challenging the dismissal of the case by the Trial Court and First Appellate Court.
The High Court overturned the decision of the Trial Court and First Appellate Court and granted an additional directive that the District Court judge shall file a complaint against the appellant, Yamanaji H. Jadhav, for the crime committed by him against his wife within three months of receiving the aforesaid judgement.
Subsequently, Yamanaji H. Jadhav filed an appeal before the Supreme Court against the order of the High Court.
Issues raised in Yamanaji H. Jadhav vs. Nirmala
On the basis of the plaint filed, the Trial Court framed the following issues:
Whether the divorce dated deed 26th June 1982 was the outcome of undue influence and coercion by the defendant, Yamanaji H. Jadhav, upon the appellant, Nirmala?
If the deed is void, does it deserve a cancellation?
Whether the court fee paid by Nirmala in her appeal was appropriate?
Whether the Trial Court had the jurisdiction to try and entertain the suit?
Arguments of the parties in the case
Appellant
The counsel for the appellant, Advocate P.R. Ramasesh, contended that the High Court had failed by interfering with the findings of the facts that were arrived at without framing the question of law in this regard.
It was further stated that it was the respondent, in fact, who deserted the appellant and further executed the divorce deed at the office of the sub-registrar at her own will.
Therefore, on the basis of the above-mentioned grounds, the judgement of the High Court ought to be dismissed as its approach is biased and for reasons that were beyond judicial scrutiny.
Respondent
The counsel for the respondent, Advocate K. Sarda Devi, contended that the plaintiff had ill-treated the respondent, the appellant’s wife, throughout the time they lived together.
The counsel further argued that the signature of the defendant on the divorce deed was obtained through coercion and fraud at the Sub-Registrar’s office.
Thus, the council supported the decision of the High Court.
Laws involved in the Yamanaji H. Jadhav vs. Nirmala
Customary divorce under Section 29(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Customs are rituals and practices that have been followed in a community, group or family consistently and uniformly for a long period of time. For a custom to be valid, it should be consistent with the statutes of the State and not be against any public policies. Divorce obtained under a specific custom is called a “customary divorce.”
Section 29(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, stated that nothing in the Act shall be considered to influence any right that is granted by a custom or given by any other special law to get the dissolution of a Hindu marriage, whether it was solemnised previously or after this Act came into effect. There are a few requisites for the practical application of this section; they are:
The marriage has to be solemnised according to the rites and rituals that have been customary in the communities of the parties involved.
The marriage has to be in accordance with the traditional and cultural norms of the communities of the parties, thereby emphasising their importance. For example, a marriage should not be between two individuals that come under a “sapinda” relationship, i.e., in their own lineage.
In the present case, the Supreme Court stated that the Trial Court did not check the validity of the deed according to the customary practices of the communities to which the parties to the marriage belonged. Therefore, they set aside the orders of the Trial Court as mentioned in the Judgement given below and directed them to start the trial afresh.
Section 97 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
According to this section, when any District Magistrate, Sub-division or first class, has a reason to believe that a person was confined under circumstances that would be offensive and liable, a search warrant shall be issued.
The persons against whom the warrant is issued or directed may search for the people who are known to be confined. If the person is found, he/she shall be taken before the Magistrate on an immediate basis, and the Court shall make an order according to the circumstances of the case as observed by them.
In this case, the father of the respondent-plaintiff had filed an application to the Trial Court under Section 97 of the CrPC, claiming that the respondent had forcibly confined her. Thereby seeking some remedy from the Court.
Judgement of the case
The judges of the Supreme Court accepted the appeal and set aside the decree and judgement of the Principle Munsif Bijapur and the High Court. The Supreme Court further remanded the matter to the Trial Court to approach and frame suitable issues as to the presence of the provisions for a customary divorce in the community of the appellant, Yamanaji H. Jadhav, and the respondent, Nirmala.
The Trial Court was then told to start afresh the trial of the case of the parties after deciding the new issue framed by the Supreme Court without being influenced by any previous findings, including the High Court findings. The Supreme Court, thus, allowed the appeal and the matter is in remand to the Trial Court for a fresh case trial in accordance with the law and in light of the observations made in the appeal.
Rationale behind this judgement
The Supreme Court, while deciding this case, stated that the Trial Court had erroneously moved forward on the basis that the divorce deed that the parties relied upon was accepted by law. The judges of the Supreme Court stated that the deed was deemed to be true and valid as per the customary laws for divorce of the community the parties belonged to without being checked by the Trial Court.
Further, the judges of the Supreme Court stated that divorce was never recognized as a means of ending a marriage under Hindu law, which was administered by Indian courts. Marriage was always regarded as a religious rite important to the sentiments of the religion, with the one exception being when it is recognized by a custom. Public policies, great ethics and the interests of society were considered to require and guarantee that, by any means, divorce should be granted only if it is in accordance with the procedures and grounds mentioned in the provisions.
The Court further stated that, if divorce is obtained under a custom that is an exception to the general law of divorce, it should be specifically pleaded and established by the parties. If it stands unproven, then it can be held as a practice under public policy. Therefore, the Supreme Court stated that the Trial Court was obligated to determine and frame an issue as to whether there were pleadings that specifically included evidence claiming the existence of a customary divorce in the community to which the parties belonged. They were also responsible for determining whether such a customary divorce and compliance with the manner or formalities associated with it were in fact established in the case at hand to the court’s satisfaction.
Upon reviewing the pleadings of the appellant, the Supreme Court came to the conclusion that there was no evidence submitted by either of the parties to claim the divorce was valid. There were no documents to claim that the divorce deed was based on the prevalence of such customary divorces in their community, as required by law. Further, there was no evidence presented to support the respondent’s claim that her consent was obtained through undue influence or coercion. It was found by the Supreme Court that the lawyers for the parties themselves agreed orally in the Trial Court that the divorce deed was in fact in accordance with the customary divorce prevailing in the communities of the parties.
The Supreme Court was, therefore, of the opinion that, unless it was established in the court of law that the divorce was claimed under specific customs of the communities that the parties belonged to, no amount of pleadings in the plaint or written statement would make the divorce deed permissible. They also stated that consensus on the part of the counsel of the parties was not grounds to permit the deed in court unless and until it was established under the customs of the communities of both parties in the court of law.
The Court further stated that, even if the plaintiff did not question the validity of the customary divorce in the Trial Court, it is the responsibility of that Court to analyse and recognize the consequences of the divorce not being a customary divorce, given that a divorce by consent is also not recognized by a court unless specifically permitted by law.
Analysis of Yamanaji H. Jadhav vs. Nirmala
What sets this case law apart is its unique circumstances and implications. While both parties presented compelling arguments, the judges initiated an enquiry on the validity of the divorce obtained and granted by the Trial Court. The Supreme Court, while going through the pleadings, noticed that the Trial Court did not check into the background of the divorce and its compliance with the Hindu Laws.
Marriage was always regarded as a religious rite important to the sentiments of the religion, with the one exception being when it is recognized by custom. Unlike other personal laws that guarantee a procedure for obtaining a divorce, Hindu Law relies on the grounds mentioned in the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, along with customary divorces that have taken place in the communities of each party. It was brought to the attention of the parties and their legal counsels that, while granting a divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the interests of the public, norms and values in society were to be considered.
Unless it is exclusively permitted in the Act, a divorce cannot be granted. The Supreme Court stated that the Trial Court was responsible for determining whether the party pleading the existence of a customary divorce in the community to which the parties belonged made proper pleadings and whether such a customary divorce and compliance with the manner or formalities associated with it were in fact established in the case at hand to the court’s satisfaction. The judges also stated that the customary divorce being an exception against the general laws related to divorce, the custom should have been specifically mentioned in the pleadings of the party. If the custom that the parties are relying on is not proved, then it shall be considered an act that is against the interest of the public.
The Court ruled that, because custom is an exception, the general rule of divorce should have been explicitly pleaded and established by strong evidence by the person pleading for the customary divorce deed. Although, while deciding this judgement the Bench did not rely upon any precedents, the case of Yamanaji H. Jadhav v. Nirmala (2002) served as a precedent for many cases.
Cases wherein Section 29(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 was applied
Sanjana Kumari v. Vijay Kumar (2023)
In this case, the appellant and her husband, the respondent, were married in 2011. The respondent claimed in his pleadings that, in the year 2014, a customary divorce deed was signed by the parties, their parents of the appellant, the father of the respondent and the members of the Gram Panchayat. Later in the year 2018, the respondent entered into a second marriage, and the appellant filed for action against the respondent under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The respondent opposed this by an application that was backed by the divorce deed. The Judicial Magistrate, however, turned down the application and granted interim maintenance to the appellant.
The respondent further appealed to the High Court, which ruled in favour of the respondent and set aside the order of the Judicial Magistrate thereby validating the customary divorce. This led the appellant to further appeal before the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal partially and remitted the case back to the High Court to check the validity of the customary divorce deed.
The Court also restored the maintenance order given by the Judicial Magistrate. Justice Surya Kant and Justice Dipankar Datta observed that customary divorce can be granted by the civil court under the power that is conferred by Section 29(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Subramani v. M. Chandralekha (2005)
In this case, it was observed that the two parties were married for a few years until Subramani sought divorce based on the customary practice that was followed in the communities of the parties. However, the Court found that there was no evidence presented by Subramani in order to validate and determine the certainty of the customary practice.
There was no evidence established by the party in their pleadings and thus they were found to be inconsistent. The Court therefore came to the conclusion that the divorce obtained under the custom was invalid.
The judges in this case emphasised the need for clear evidence to establish the validity of customary divorce and held that it is the responsibility of the parties asserting the prevalence of such customs to specifically plead and establish the same in their pleadings
Conclusion
This case of Yamanaji H. Jadhav v. Nirmala, AIR 2002 SC 971, as decided by the Supreme Court, highlighted the importance of examining the validity of the facts of the parties’ pleadings according to the Sections under which they are pleaded. It emphasised the significance of establishing the customary practices of the community that the parties belong to. The parties in the present case did not, in either of their pleadings, be it plaint or the written statement, specify the customary practice that had been followed in their communities that allowed such a divorce.
The Supreme Court first highlighted that Hindu Law traditionally does not recognise divorce and considers marriage as a sacrament that is insoluble. While the appellant pleaded for divorce under customary practice, he failed to back his claim with substantial evidence in the Trial Court.
Therefore, the Supreme Court set aside the decisions given by the Trial Court as well as the High Court and directed the Trial Court to begin the case anew. The Trial Court was directed to frame new issues that were centred around the validity of the alleged customary divorce and allow the parties to submit any additional evidence for their claims.
The ruling, in this case, served as a precedent for future disputes, emphasising the importance of proving customary practices backed by substantial evidence and also directing the role of the judiciary at the Trial Court to ensure it is complied with. It also reinforced the principle that divorces where consent mattered should strictly follow the principles.
Thus, this case truly protected individuals and ensured fair justice from the judiciary’s end.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is customary divorce?
The term “customary divorce” is not widely used in law, and divorce laws can differ significantly from one jurisdiction to the next. These are separate from procedures and practices that are as per standard or customary practices inside a particular social or strict setting.
Divorce may be governed by traditional or customary laws rather than state civil laws in some cultures or religious communities. These standard separation practices could include explicit customs, methodology, or prerequisites that contrast with provisions under Hindu Law.
It was observed by Justice Surya Kant and Justice Dipankar in the Yamanaji H. Jadhav vs. Nirmala (2002) that a civil court can grant customary divorce under the provision that is given by Section 29(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
Can one seek divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955?
Divorce was not essentially a part of Hindu Law as it was believed that the marital relationship was indissoluble. However, due to changing societies and circumstances, there are certain grounds mentioned for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is based on the concept of fault theory, where one of the aggrieved spouses can approach the court under Section 13 of the said Act. It is only permitted for a grave reason in the interest of society.
In Yamanaji H. Jadhav v. Nirmala (2002), the Supreme Court stated that the Trial Court had failed to check the validity of divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and proceeded with the suit. Thus, the Court directed the case back to the Trial Court for examination of the divorce deed and its validity.
What are the grounds for divorce as per the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955?
According to Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the grounds for divorce are:
Adultery
Cruelty
Desertion
Conversion
Unsoundness of mind
Leprosy
Venereal disease
Renunciation
Presumption of death
Apart from these, Section 13(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, provides for grounds for divorce only available to the wife as follows:
Bigamy by husband;
Act of rape, sodomy or bestiality committed by the husband;
No cohabitation between husband and wife for a period of more than one year after the decree for maintenance has been passed;
The marriage was solemnised before the wife attained 15 years of age, she can then repudiate the marriage.
Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:
This article is written by Arya Senapati. It attempts to analyse the case of Jaya Bachchan v. Union of India (2006) in the light of its facts, issues, legal provisions, arguments and judgements. It also covers the principle of office of profit under the Constitution of India and discusses the various aspects related to it. The case analysis also refers to various precedents and related case laws regarding the concept of office of profit.
Table of Contents
Introduction
In a parliamentary democracy like India, Members of the Parliament and Members of the Legislative Assembly are responsible for representing the views and opinions of the people they seek to represent. This representative feature of governance is highly important, especially for a nation like India, wherein there are people from different walks of life and diversity is highly prevalent. Therefore, it becomes very important to ensure that people who are selected to represent the concerns, views and opinions of the citizens are capable enough of doing so in the best way possible. These representatives are elected through a standardised constitutional machinery of election, through votes from the people of a constituency that they seek to represent. Once elected, they form a collective understanding on the concerns, problems, opinions and views of the people and present it at the Parliament or the Legislative Assemblies, so as to help the people they are representing in getting their voices heard. Therefore, our Constitution ensures that these individuals have enough qualifications to provide adequate and proper service to their people. Article 84 of the Indian Constitution specifies certain qualifications that a candidate needs to fulfil to be eligible to contest the elections for being a Member of the Parliament. The basic qualifications are:
must be a citizen of India;
must be of 25 years of age for Lok Sabha and 35 years of age for Rajya Sabha; and
fulfil any such other qualifications prescribed under any other law in effect in India.
Along with these qualifications, the Constitution also mentions certain disqualifications to ensure that governance is carried out through the relevant statutory principles and any form of defect associated with an individual seeking to be a representative of the people, doesn’t affect the smooth functioning of the constitutional governance mechanisms. Article 102 of the Constitution of India deals with these disqualifications. It states that a person is disqualified from being chosen as a member of a parliament if he:
holds an office of profit under the Government of India or Government of any State;
is of unsound mind and is declared as such by a competent court;
is an undischarged insolvent;
not a citizen of India or has acquired citizenship of a foreign state;
disqualified by any other law in operation in India and made by the parliament.
These disqualifications prevent a person from contesting elections to be a Member of the Parliament. The disqualification that has been one of the most contested ones, is the “office of profit” which is also at the core of the case of Jaya Bachchan v. Union of India (2006). This disqualification basically entails that any person who holds an office under the State Government or Central Government and is deriving any monetary or pecuniary gain from it, shall be disqualified from being eligible to contest elections for being a Member of the Parliament. It also states that if the Parliament declares a particular office to be exempted from such a disqualification, this provision would not apply to a person holding such an office. The explanation to Article 102 states that, a person shall not be deemed to hold an office of profit when he holds the position of a Union Minister or a State Minister. Many people have been disqualified using this provision of “office of profit”. In this case, Mrs. Jaya Bachchan’s eligibility was challenged using the same as a ground of contention.
Details of the case
Name of the petitioner: Jaya Bachchan
Name of the respondent: Union of India
Court: Supreme Court of India
Case type: Writ petition (civil)
Bench: JusticeC.K. Thakker and Justice R.V. Raveendran
Date of judgement: 08/05/2006
Citation: AIR 2006 SC 2119
Important laws dealt in the case: Article 84, 102, 103, 104, 111 of the Constitution of India, Section 2, 3 of the Parliament (Prevention of Disqualification) Act, 1959
Facts of Jaya Bachchan vs. Union of India (2006)
In this instant case, The Government of Uttar Pradesh had appointed Mrs. Jaya Bachchan, the petitioner, as the Chairperson of the Uttar Pradesh Film Development Council. This appointment was done through an official memorandum and sanctioned the petitioner to the rank of a Cabinet Minister.
By virtue of the position that the petitioner held, she was given certain benefits which included an honorarium of Rs. 5000 per month, a daily allowance of Rs. 600 per day for expenditures within the state and Rs. 750 for expenditure outside the state. She was also entitled to an entertainment expenditure of Rs. 10,000 per month.
Apart from the pecuniary entitlements, she was also given a staff car with a driver, telephones for her office and her residence, one personal secretary, one personal assistant and two Class 4 employees. She was provided with a bodyguard, a night escort, and the privilege of free accommodation and medical treatment to her and her family members. She was also given access to free accommodation in Government Circuit Houses/ Guest Houses, alongwith hospitality measures while touring
Based on these facts and the laws related to disqualifications of a Member of the Parliament, the Election Commission of India stated that the office which the petitioner held that is Chairperson of the Uttar Pradesh Film Development Council, is an office of profit under the Government of Uttar Pradesh and can be considered for the purposes of Article 102(1)(a) of the Constitution of India, to declare the petitioner as disqualified.
The Commission also took into consideration that the said office did not fall under the exempted offices provided under the Section 3 of the Parliament (Prevention of Disqualification) Act, 1959 and therefore, it is a valid ground for disqualification of the petitioner.
Based on the powers conferred on the President by virtue of Article 103(1) of the Indian Constitution, an order was passed on 16th March, 2006 which declared the petitioner as disqualified from being a Member of the Rajya Sabha on and from the 14th July, 2004. This order was passed after the president reviewed the opinion of the Election Commission of India.
The petitioner therefore approached the Apex Court in connection to the order of disqualification, with her contentions to prove otherwise.
Issues raised
The primary legal issues raised in this case are the following:
Whether the office of Chairperson of Uttar Pradesh Film Development Council was an office of profit?
Was Jaya Bachchan, the petitioner, disqualified from being a Member of the Parliament because she held an office of profit?
Arguments of the parties
The arguments of the parties are bifurcated as follows:
Contentions of the petitioner
To prove that the petitioner didn’t hold an office of profit, she provided the Apex Court with the following contentions:
To counter the terms of receiving remuneration and availing benefits, the petitioner contended that:
The post of Chairperson at the Uttar Pradesh Film Development Council was merely a decorative post and not of much significance.
The petitioner stated that she had not received any remuneration or monetary gains by holding the position under the State Government.
Even though she was provided with many facilities, she had never availed any of them. She had never sought residential accommodation, or used the telephone and medical facilities, and even though she had to travel for work in connection to the position that she held, she had never asked for a reimbursement.
She submitted that she received the position on an honorary basis and had not made use of any of the facilities mentioned in the official memorandum of appointment.
In the absence of any proof that she had gained any payment of monetary considerations for her position, the ECI could not hold that she occupied an office of profit under the State Government. This would make the disqualification invalid.
The petitioner relied on the decision given by the Apex Court in the case ofUmrao Singh v. Darbara Singh (1969), in which it dealt with the question of whether payment of a monthly consolidated allowance for performing all official work outside the district and daily allowances for days of attendance of meetings, travel etc. would make the office of the Chairman of the Panchayat Samiti, an office of profit. In this case, the Court held that these allowances are paid to the Chairmen to ensure that the expenditure that they have to incur to conduct the duty in connection to the position, should not be from his own pocket. Therefore, these monetary allowances cannot be said to turn the position of the Chairman of the Panchayat Samiti, as an office of profit.
The petitioner also cited the decision of the Court in the case of Divya Prakash v. Kultar Chand Rana and Anr. (1975). In this case, the Apex Court held that the position of the Chairman of the Board of School Education of the State of Himachal Pradesh is not an office of profit. The candidate was appointed in an honorary capacity and was not provided with any remuneration and there was no pay scale attached to the post of Chairman in this case.
Based on the above two decisions, the counsel for the petitioner contended that when a person is appointed in a position without any remuneration and in an honorary capacity, even though the post carries remuneration, it cannot be said to be an office of profit and therefore cannot be disqualified under the constitutional provisions.
Therefore, the petitioner prayed to the court with the petition that the Hon’ble Supreme Court may declare the disqualification to be invalid and further declare that the petitioner didn’t hold any office of profit.
Judgement in Jaya Bachchan vs. Union of India (2006)
The Apex Court found that it cannot be disputed that the Council for Film Development, Uttar Pradesh is not an autonomous body or statutory corporation. The Council doesn’t have a budget of its own and depends on the Department of State Government for all its administrative expenditures and all other spendings.
The Court stated that the appointment of the petitioner as the Chairperson of the Council that conferred her with the rank of a Cabinet Minister, is also not disputed as it was done by the Official Memorandum dated 23.3.1991 and entitled her to various benefits, remunerations and entitlements.
Article 102(1)(a) states that a person shall be held to be disqualified from being elected as a member of either Houses of the Parliament in case of the person holding an office of profit under the Government of India or the Government of any State, unless such an office is exempted by the application of a law made by the Parliament itself. The term “office of profit” is nowhere defined in the Indian Constitution and is therefore dependent upon judicial interpretation of the subject matter. Based on various previous decisions of the Court on the matter of office of profit, it can be stated that it is an office which has the potential or capability of yielding a profit or pecuniary gain. To hold an office under the Central or State Government, to which a pay scale, emolument, remuneration or non-compensatory allowance is attributed, can be held to be an office of profit.
Whether a person holds an office of profit or not is a question that should be decided in a realistic manner and any payment concerned with such an office must be judged in substance and not in the form of payment. The nomenclature of such a payment is not material, while constituting whether a person received any monetary benefit or not. The mere use of the word “honorarium” cannot delineate the payment from the ambit of profit or monetary gain. The payment of an honorarium amount, provision of daily allowances, entitlement to rent-free accommodation and a chauffeur driven car at the expense of the State Government can be said to fall under the scope of pecuniary gain and can be adequately termed as “profit” on the part of the recipient or the holder of the office.
The Court should try to assess whether the office is capable of yielding any profit to the person or not. While deciding so, actual profit or monetary and pecuniary gain received is immaterial. It does not matter if the person has actually received any profit or not, but the simple fact that the office is capable of yielding profit is sufficient to label it as an “office of profit”.
The Court stated that all the decisions which the petitioner cited in her contentions hold no value, as those cases turned on their own facts and laid no propositions which are contrary to the law established. The cases which are of actual importance are that of Ravanna Subanna, Satrucharla Chandrasekhar Raju and Shibu Soren, as mentioned earlier. It is a solidly established principle that whenever the office carries with it certain emoluments, it will be held to be an office of profit even if the holder has not received any actual pecuniary gains with regard to the office.
In this instant matter, as per the memorandum of appointment, the office carried a monthly honorarium of Rs. 5000 and entertainment expenditure of Rs. 10,000, along with a staff car and driver, telephone, free accommodation and medical treatments. All of these things are pecuniary gains. The fact that the petitioner was financially affluent and therefore was not interested in any of these benefits is irrelevant and therefore, the disqualification was valid and the petition stood dismissed.
Critical analysis of Jaya Bachchan vs. Union of India (2006)
The primary point of law that is reiterated in the judgement and has been established in a series of decisions, is that an office of profit by definition, is any office that is capable of yielding any profit to the holder of the office. Profit simply means any pecuniary gain, monetary allowance, remuneration, emoluments etc. Simply stating the remuneration as an honorarium does not exclude it from the purview of profit. The only thing that can be excluded from the ambit of profit is, reimbursement paid for any expenses paid out of the own pocket of the office holder for conducting his duty in connection to the position. Therefore, it is immaterial whether the holder received any actual profit or not. The very fact that an office is capable of yielding profit is sufficient to declare it as an office of profit.
The decision taken by the Apex Court follows the established law and sets a clear standardised precedent for other benches to follow in similar cases. It is highly important to assess the idea of “profit” and “office of profit” with a broad definition, to ensure that the objectives of the constitutional provisions are well protected and are not vitiated by acts of ineligible candidates. This guarantees that only those interested in spearheading the administrative and governance mechanisms of a representative democracy get ahead in the election. Therefore, this decision holds great significance in the realms of election law.
Historical background of office of profit
The term “office of profit” is not defined anywhere in the Constitution of India. The perspective that by holding certain offices or positions, a Member of the Parliament is in some way obstructed from fulfilling his true constitutional duties towards the people he represents, or that his independence is affected in certain ways that weaken his responsibilities towards the people of his constituency and therefore, should be a reason to disqualify him, is taken from the Parliamentary history of the United Kingdom. It developed in the United Kingdom in more than four phases. The first phase is the privilege phase, the second is the corruption phase, and the third is the ministerial responsibility phase.
In the earliest time, the English Parliament established priority over the services of the Members and it was considered to be derogatory for the members to accept any other position which would require a significant amount of time and attention that should ideally be spent on fulfilling their duties as Members of the Parliament. This understanding led to the conclusion that Members of the Parliament holding other offices, is incompatible with their position and therefore should not be accepted.
In the second phase, a growing difference was seen in between loyalty to the Crown and loyalty to the House of Commons which signified a member’s loyalty to the people he represented. Therefore, it was held that any position held by a Member of the Parliament under the Crown leads to his loyalty towards the Parliament being compromised and therefore a matter of disqualification.
In the third phase, the King became a part of the constitutional machinery and became the constitutional head of the Parliament. Therefore, all the members became Ministers to the King and it was held that these Ministers have a responsibility towards the King, the Constitution and the people. The responsibility is compromised if the Minister accepts any office of profit and is hence a valid ground of disqualification.
Office of profit in India
Even though India adopted the concept of office of profit from the English parliamentary system, it made certain modifications to it as it kept developing in the Indian scenario. The first mention regarding office of profit in India can be found in Section 26(1)(a) of the Government of India Act, 1935, wherein it was stated that a person shall be disqualified from being selected as a member of either of the Chambers of the Parliament, if he held any office of profit under the Crown of India, other than those offices declared as exempted under the Act of the Federal Legislature.
Origin of Parliament (Prevention of Disqualification) Act, 1950
When the Indian Constitution came into effect, it declared that a person holding an office of profit would be disqualified from being a Member of the Parliament in either house and the explanation provided in Article 102 clarified that the person who is a Minister in either the Union or the State, is not said to hold an office of profit. However, the earlier understanding of Ministers only included Cabinet Ministers and to address this understanding, the Parliament (Prevention of Disqualification) Act, 1950 came into picture. Section 2 of the Act stated that a person shall not be disqualified from being selected as a Member of Parliament to either of the houses, simply on the ground that he/she holds an office of profit under the Government of India and/or the Government of any State wherein the position is of a Minister of State or a Deputy Minister or Parliamentary Secretary or Parliamentary Under Secretary.
It basically meant that a person holding any office of profit under the Central or State Government in the position of a Minister of State or Deputy Minister of Parliamentary Secretary or Parliamentary Under Secretary is exempted from the disqualification laid down by Article 102.
The Parliament (Prevention of Disqualification) Act, 1951
Followed by the 1950 Act, the 1951 Act came into existence, which had a retrospective effect in terms of its application. It stated in Section 2 that certain offices of profit held by Members of Parliament under the Government, would not disqualify them and they shall be deemed to have never been disqualified by virtue of the retrospective application. They shall be eligible to be selected as a Member of either Houses of the Parliament. The retrospective effect was applicable from 26.1.1950.
Formation of the Bhargava Committee
In the year of 1954, the Bhargava Committee was constituted and was headed by Pandit Thakur Das Bhargava. The main objective of the committee was to examine various matters related to the disqualifications of the Members of the Parliament and to make certain recommendations regarding creation of a comprehensive legislation regarding such disqualification. Based on the reports of the Bhargava Committee, the Parliament (Prevention of Disqualification) Act, 1959 was enacted and declared that certain offices of profit under the Government shall not disqualify the holders from being chosen as Members of Parliament. Section 3 of this Act lists out certain offices which are exempted and this Section is amended from time to time to make changes to the lists. Some of the offices exempted are:
Office of Minister, Minister of State, Deputy Minister for Union or State
Office of a member of any delegation or mission sent outside India by the Government for any special purpose etc.
These are some of the major examples from the long list of exemptions.
Developments post the Jaya Bachchan case
After the decision of the Apex court in the Jaya Bachchan case, it was observed that many Members of the Parliament are holding offices of profit,’ which would lead to the same disqualifications as faced by Jaya Bachchan in her matter before the Supreme Court. To remedy this situation, the Parliament (Prevention of Disqualification) Amendment Bill, 2006 was introduced on 16th May, 2006 in the Lok Sabha and was passed on the same date. The next day, it was introduced in the Rajya Sabha and was passed on the same date. The President returned the bill to the Parliament for reconsideration under Article 111 of the Constitution. The Bill was again passed by both Houses and then the President provided assent. Section 2 of this amendment act inserted clauses under Section 3 of the Principal Act, to exempt certain other offices which were:
The office of the Chairman, Deputy Chairman, Secretary or Member (by whatever name called) in any statutory or non-statutory body.
The office of the Chairperson or Trustee of any Public or Private Trust.
The office of the Chairman, President or Principal Secretary or Secretary of the Governing Body of any society registered by law.
Procedure regarding disqualification of members
The next important constitutional provision under the concept of office of profit, is Article 103, which deals with the question of what would happen if an already elected and sitting Member of the Parliament is subjected to the disqualifications prescribed in Article 102. In such a situation, the President is referred to and whatever decision the President takes shall be considered to be full and final. The President has to consult and seek the opinion of the Election Commission before making any decision under this provision and has to act in accordance with the opinion given by it.
Article 104 also imposes a penalty on any person who, having known to be disqualified under Article 102, sits in the Parliament and exercises his/ her right to vote as member of the Parliament, in the parliamentary proceedings. A sum of 500 Rs. per day is to be taken from such Members for each day of sitting and voting in the Parliament after the said disqualification.
In detail, this is how the constitutional understanding of the term office of profit developed in the Indian parliamentary system through various laws, amendments and constitutional provisions. The Jaya Bachchan judgement is therefore highly significant as it led to important amendments to the disqualification laws of the nation and extended the list of offices which are exempted as offices of profits under the ambit of Article 102 of the Indian Constitution. More so, it became a standard for other similar cases in front of the judiciary.
Joint Parliamentary Committee on Offices, 2018 Report
I. Whether there is government control over the appointment and revocation of such appointment in connection to the office. Whether the government exercises any control over the functioning and performance of the office, shall also be considered.
II. Whether the person who holds the office is drawing any form of remuneration from the said office. The remuneration can be in the form of sitting fee, honorarium, salary etc. Any kind of payment that is not in the nature of compensatory allowance (reimbursement of expenses incurred from one’s own pocket for performing duties in connection to the office), would be considered as profit. If a member is drawing more than what is required to reimburse the actual out of pocket expenses, it will be a matter of disqualification.
III. Whether the office attributes any executive, legislative and judicial powers or other powers such as disbursement of funds, allocation of lands, issuing of licences, appointment of people, grant of scholarships etc., to the holder of the said office.
IV. Whether the position held by the person by virtue of holding the office enables him to wield influence of power by way of patronage. If so, it will be a matter of disqualification.
While many legal scholars and practitioners stood against the idea of developing a standardised definition of office of profit, the Joint Committee felt that it is important to have such a definition for the term, since without understanding what constitutes an office of profit, it is not feasible to lay down exemptions for the same. The Committee does not believe in the argument that by defining an office of profit, the courts would be open to a flood of litigation on the matter. There would be many advantages to defining an office of profit. It would provide more clarity on what constitutes an office of profit and what does not. By defining the term, the legislators can make a more informed choice before accepting the offer of holding any office under the government. The definition would make the law more transparent and effective in terms of implementation and would result in improving the image of the public representatives. Arbitrariness in appointment would be greatly reduced by having a clear definition in place. While attempting to define the term, all relevant judicial pronouncements must be taken into consideration, to create a constitutionally valid definition.
Case laws on office of profit
Ravanna Subanna v. G.S. Kageerappa (1954)
In this case, the Apex Court held that the word profit means the gaining of anything that is pecuniary and such a pecuniary gain must be attached to the office. If there truly is a gain, the quantum or measure of it would be immaterial and the amount of money actually received by the person would not matter. What matters is the amount of money that is receivable by the virtue of the position that the person is in. That amount which is receivable by the person is what connotes the term “profit”.
Kanta Kathuria v. Manak Chand Surana (1969)
In this case, the term “office” was interpreted by the Apex Court. It is a landmark case, which held that a Member of the Legislative Assembly cannot be disqualified for the purposes of holding an office of profit, unless the opposition proves that the office can exist independent of the holder. In this matter, the petitioner was appointed as a Special Government Pleader in the State of Rajasthan. This appointment was alleged to be an office of profit to disqualify the petitioner. The Apex Court held that such an office is not an office of profit, as it is not a permanent post. It is simply an assignment of certain duties, which the petitioner must fulfil by virtue of the appointment. The office must exist independently of the holder to be termed as an office of profit.
Divya Prakash v. Kultar Chand Rana & Anr. (1975)
In this case, the respondent’s appointment as the Chairman of the State Board of School Education was challenged. The appointment was made on an honorary basis. It was argued by the petitioner that the respondent holds an office to which a pay scale is attached. The Apex Court rejected the argument and stated that the Board which attached the pay scale is not entitled to do so and the respondent has never truly received any salary from the said office. He was also not entitled to any salary, as the appointment was made on an honorary basis. Therefore, it cannot be termed to be a matter of “profit”.
Ramakrishna Hegde v. State of Karnataka (1993)
In this case, the petitioner’s appointment as the Deputy Chairman of Planning Commision was challenged on the ground that it was an office of profit as the petitioner is entitled to a cabinet rank and received various allowances which included a fully furnished house, chauffeur driven car and the entitlements of a State guest. The Karnataka High Court Court held that the monetary entitlement was merely compensatory for all the expenses that the petitioner had to incur from his own pocket and therefore it cannot be deemed to be a matter of profit. The mere entitlement of a rank of Cabinet Minister and state guest is not enough to prove the bearings of an office profit. Therefore, the disqualifications are invalid.
Satrucharla Chandrasekhar Raju v. Vyricherla Pradeep Kumar Dev & Anr. (1992)
This is another landmark case in which the candidate contesting election was a school teacher for a school that was governed by the Integrated Tribal Development Agency (ITDA), and therefore was alleged to hold an office of profit. The office which appointed the candidate as a teacher is a government office and members of the school’s governance authority are government officers too. The school operated on government sanctioned funds, but the Supreme Court held that the post was not a government post and the ITDA cannot be considered as an appointing authority. This case interpreted the meaning of the term “government office”. Certain tests were laid down, which are as follows:
a) The government has the appointing power and also the power to revoke such an appointment. Simple exercise of control of the government over the appointing authority is not enough to constitute a government office.
b) The holder of the office must be paid out of the revenues generated by the government.
c) The degree and extent of control that the government has over the appointing authority is material while deciding if the office is a government office or not.
Consumer Education and Research Society v. Union of India (2009)
This is a landmark case in which the constitutional validity of the Parliament (Prevention of Disqualification) Amendment Act, 2006 was challenged. It was argued that through this amendment, the disqualification of 55 holders of office of profit was prevented and those offices were added to the list of offices exempted from disqualification by law. It was argued that this law was passed simply to prevent such disqualifications and to allow the members to continue being MPs despite originally falling under the ambit of disqualification. The contention was that a constitutional convention of referring the question of exempting offices of profit to the Joint Committee on offices of profit, was something that evolved over time and it has been completely disregarded in this case and therefore, the constitutional validity is at threat. The Apex Court held that the Parliament had complete power to decide on the matter of exemption of certain offices from the ambit of office of profit and in connection to that power, the Parliament is free to pass any legislation by following due procedure. The practice of referring such actions to the Joint Committee is simply a parliamentary procedure that can be waived and it finds no mention in the constitutional principles or conventions. The absence of such reference cannot be said to invalidate the legislation as a whole. The judiciary has time and again held that the State Legislative Assemblies and the Parliament have the power to legislate retrospectively in matters of constitutional provisions. Therefore, the legislation is completely valid as per the constitutional norms and cannot be challenged as invalid.
Conclusion
The duty or rather the responsibility of representing a large group of the public and forming public consensus on various matters of governance is a significant one. It has often been considered to be a privilege and sacrosanct duty of the person so selected/elected to do so. Any hindrance or compromise in the said duty is therefore averted and deemed to be unduly of the responsibilities and powers conferred on a Member of a Parliament. Hence, it is highly important to maintain the integrity of the position and perform the duties without any deficiency. Owing to this principle, the concept of disqualification based on holding an office of profit emerged in the British Parliamentary System and was adopted by the Indian Constitution. Till date, the concept is evolving, with judicial pronouncements and interventions made by committees which deliberate on defining and determining what constitutes as an office of profit. The lack of a standardised and clear definition makes it truly troublesome to determine what an office of profit is and therefore, judicial decisions in cases like Jaya Bachchan v. The Union of India (2006) are very important to assess the question of disqualifications based on holding an office of profit in India. Many more relevant judicial pronouncements also contribute to this discourse by defining various aspects of the provision. Through the guidance provided by the judiciary and constitutional provisions, it is expected that the representatives of the public would be entrusted with fulfilling their duties and responsibilities towards their constituents, without any compromise or deficiency. However, it is yet to be seen if a clear definition of the term “office of profit” will be developed or not.
Frequently asked questions
What is the ratio decidendi of the Jaya Bachchan v. Unionof India case?
The primary ratio decidendi of the case is that while determining if an office constitutes as an office of profit, it is immaterial whether the holder has actually received any pecuniary benefits. The fact that the office is capable of yielding profit is enough to declare the office as an office of profit.
What is the constitutional provision on office of profit?
Article 102 states that a person holding an office of profit under the Central or State Government, not being an office exempted by law, would be disqualified from being chosen as a member of either House of the Parliament. A Minister of the State or the Centre is deemed to be exempted from such disqualification.
Which law exempts offices of profit from the application of disqualification?
The Parliament (Prevention of Disqualification) Act, 1959 is a law that specifies which offices are exempted from the purview of disqualification. It is amended continually to add or alter offices present in the list. One example of an exempted office, is the office of Chairman of Planning Commision.
What is the procedure for such disqualification by virtue of holding an office of profit?
As per Article 103, the President is referred to any question that arises in connection to disqualification of a member for holding an office of profit. The President then seeks the opinion of the Election Commision of India (ECI) and must act according to such opinion. The decision of the President on the matter is final.
What are the penalties of continuing as a member even after disqualification?
The Article 104 states that if a Member of the Parliament continues to sit in the parliamentary sessions and vote in the same, he will be penalised with an amount of Rs. 500 per day, from the period of such disqualification, based on the total number of days in which he sat and voted even after being disqualified.
Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:
“The rights of every man are diminished when the rights of one man are threatened – John F Kennedy”
As human society advances rapidly, so has the alarming rate of criminal activity. From traditional thefts and robberies to emerging cybercrimes. Historical and modern crime share a common thread, which stems from the impact on the victims, who are the ones at the receiving end of the consequences of the criminal acts. The common goal of humanity is to establish a society that offers a peaceful existence along with a sense of security, allowing men to live with dignity.
Despite having stringent laws in place that primarily focus on getting the offender punished, it is seldom recognised that the victim of the offence also lives through the effects of the crime long after it has even taken place.
This article talks about the victims and the laws of crime in place in the past and in contemporary times.
Criminal jurisprudence
Criminal jurisprudence is a subfield of legal philosophy which investigates the ideas and theories which form the essence of the criminal justice system. It is the science that addresses crime; it dives deep into what led to the criminal behaviour and what the man’s response was to it.
The origin of criminal jurisprudence can be traced to the Code of Ur-Nammu and Hammurabi’s Code, which prescribed laws to regulate human behaviour in society. In mediaeval times, justice was administered based on the customs and norms, which were very distinctive and were practiced in specific areas or by members of certain groups as they lacked a more organised justice system.
The complexities of the progressing civilizations required a systematic framework to deliver justice. In order to ensure orderly administration, there was an initiative to create written legal codes. This was done to facilitate a more organised approach to covering various offences occurring in our daily lives in matters such as family or business-related matters.
The extensive Code of Hammurabi was composed by the Babylonian king Hammurabi in 1754 BC. It contained laws that described the consequences of breaking decorum and committing any offence.
The well-known “eye for an eye” law, also referred to as lex tallions, was based on the retribution method of justice, which maintained that the severity of the punishment meted out for the offence would depend on the victim’s suffering. The entire concept rests on the notion that to demonstrate how equitable the legal system is, the offender must endure the same suffering as the victim.
This principle was one of the earliest attempts to create an orderly form of achieving justice. Despite its severity, its approach may not be welcomed in present times but it is certainly said to have had an impact on the development of the theory of retribution in criminal jurisprudence.
The objective of criminal jurisprudence is to shield society from wrongs by including the principles and guidelines that establish what crime is and lay out the penalties for those guilty of committing the crime. It seeks to preserve individual rights while maintaining law and order in society.
Victim and victim rights
Who is a victim
The excerpt of the definition of a victim under the UN declaration gives a more holistic perspective on the meaning of victim- A victim is an individual or a group of individuals who suffered individually or collectively any kind of harm, including physical, mental, and economic loss, or a significant loss that is a result of the violation of the individual‘s basic rights. A violation of a basic right occurs because of an act or an omission of an act that violates the criminal law of the particular country. Unlike most of the countries where there has been specific assistance and compensation provided to the victims, the same was ignored under the Indian Judicial System. Under the Indian legal framework, a Victim is defined in Cr.P.C under Section 2(wa)– as “a person who has suffered any loss or injury caused because of the act or omission for which the accused person has been charged and the expression victim includes his or her guardian or legal heir.”
The victim under the criminal justice system is seen suffering more than the offender or accused due to the lack of recognition of the victim’s rights. From the very start in the process of filing an FIR or registering the case, the victim often has to undergo a lot of hardship, even before their issues are even considered.
A brief timeline of victim’s rights in India
This section covers the rights of victims in India over the years, from the past to the present.
The victim’s position in the event of a crime at the beginning of mankind was of prominence. The involvement of the victim was the key, as it came from the idea that the crime that took place was personal; hence, it becomes pertinent for the victim to also be a part of the administration process. Over time, the involvement of victims in the process was diminished up until recently, when the laws were modified in an attempt to be made in a manner that caters to the victims’ right to be heard and their struggles to be acknowledged.
The ancient times – the golden era of victim’s rights
The ancients gave victims more importance; it was their obligation to be part of the process to punish the offender. In the 18th century, the legal landscape had a more active participation of the victims in the criminal justice process. The victims were not only present at the scene of the crime but were also engaged in the prosecution of the offender.
They also had the opportunity to raise objections in courtrooms if they disagreed with the judgements passed by the courts.
The Hindu texts show that exhaustive approaches were taken to address the victim’s concerns. These scriptures, along with acknowledging the presence of the victims, also outlined provisions for tackling the issues faced by the victims. It ensured that the offenders were punished and victims received compensation, medical attention and damages done to the property were taken into account when the punishments were prescribed.
It can be said that the victims played a primary role in ancient times, while the offenders and Kings were to ensure the victims were well compensated for their losses.
The mediaeval times
The victim’s rights during mediaeval times were largely unchanged from those of ancient times. The crime, although no longer a personal injury, was an act against state or public morale. With the invasion of the Mughals, criminal jurisprudence went through some changes. The laws were divided based on religion and punishments were also prescribed based on the religions and local customs. In mediaeval times, the victims had the right to cross-examine the accused under oaths and were involved in the entire process, wherein the judgements were passed in open courts. The diversification of the legal system during mediaeval times varied based on social, cultural and religious factors. Despite attempts to codify and formalise the legal systems, they were influenced by the same.
The protection offered to the victim in mediaeval times was limited to restitution and compensation.
The colonial era
The rule over India by the Colonial Power, which lasted for more than a century, did come with its own set of challenges for the crown.
Given the diversity of the Indian population, which was primarily balancing the justice system on customs and religions, the East India Company discovered numerous gaps in the legal administration. During a significant period of British rule, the use of law to decide matters of crime was based on Islamic law. An instance of this was when the victim’s family had the right under Islamic law to pardon the offender. The early British rulers tried to merge English laws with existing laws in India.
The victim’s participation in the process of criminal jurisprudence was limited and they often played a very passive role. The key focus during the British Raj was more on punishing the offenders than on the victim and their rights.
The legal system followed during these times was an adversarial approach, wherein the state conducted the proceedings, deployed the punishment and imposed fines on the offender. Their reliance on the English Common Law to conduct the proceedings lacked restitution for the victims, who were often seen as marginalised in the legal process.
The criminal jurisprudence during the colonial era was very much influenced by the needs and demands of the Company and Crown; it had little to no measures prescribed for the victims and their rights.
Only after India gained its independence did the laws for the protection of victims begin to evolve.
VS Malimath Committee
The committee chaired by Justice VS Malimath, which was formed to suggest reforms in the criminal justice system, was formed in 2003. This was formed due to repeated criticism of the drawbacks of the reform system. The committee suggested 158 recommendations in two volumes.
The committee was to examine the criminal justice system in India and suggest more efficient and effective reforms.
It includes a wide range of subjects, from police reforms, judicial reform, victim’s rights, and witness protection programmes.
The committee suggested the following for victim’s rights in India some of them are as followed-
The victims are to be made part of the proceedings where the sentence for the offence exceeds the term of 7 years of imprisonment or more and to be compensated adequately. The compensation to the victims was suggested to be through fines and forfeitures imposed on the offenders.
The victim is to be represented by his choice of advocate, and the cost of the same is to be borne by the state in case he cannot afford the same. This was done to balance the imbalance between the victims and the offending party and to accredit the victim with the means to navigate the proceedings better.
The victim has the right to appeal against any adverse order passed by the court.
The committee suggested forming cells to assist the victims with the court proceedings, informing them about their rights.
It emphasises the need to protect the victims from harassment and recommends establishing safety measures for those participating in the legal proceedings.
The recommendations made by the committee, especially the compensation to the victim, were a right step in the direction of recognising and acknowledging the cost, not limited to financial but psychological effects, undergone by the victims of the crime.
The establishment of compensation funds for the victims, irrespective of the conviction status of the offender, to provide the victim and their families with financial aid.
The Committee constituted by the Ministry of Home Affairs on “reforms of the criminal justice system”suggested ways to protect the innocent and unsparingly punish the guilty, restoring the faith of the common man in the system.
This led to reforming the practice by the Apex and High Courts in passing sentences and awarding compensation and relief to the victims.
In the significant cases of Nilabati Behera vs. State of Orissa (1993 2 SCC 746) and Chairman, Railway Board vs. Chandrima Das (2000 Cr LJ 1437 SC), Indian courts recognized the importance of compensating victims for the failure of state instrumentalities to protect their rights. These groundbreaking decisions set a precedent for awarding substantial monetary compensation to victims who suffered harm due to the state’s negligence.
In Nilabati Behera vs. State of Orissa, the Supreme Court of India awarded compensation to the victim of a brutal gang rape committed by police officers. The court held the state liable for the actions of its employees, emphasising that the state has a duty to protect the rights of its citizens. The court awarded compensation of Rs. 1 lakh to the victim, considering the physical and mental trauma she had endured.
Similarly, in Chairman, Railway Board vs. Chandrima Das, the Supreme Court awarded compensation to the victim of a railway accident caused by the negligence of railway employees. The court held that the railways, as an instrumentality of the state, was liable for the injuries suffered by the victim. The court awarded compensation of Rs. 5 lakhs to the victim, considering the severity of her injuries and the loss of earning capacity.
These cases are significant as they established the principle of state liability for the failure to protect the rights of victims. The courts recognised that the state has a duty to ensure the safety and security of its citizens and that any failure to do so can result in legal liability. The awards of substantial monetary compensation in these cases also sent a strong message that the state must take proactive measures to prevent such incidents from occurring and to provide adequate compensation to victims when they do occur.
However, the successful implementation of the strategies needs a more comprehensive strategy but is met with procedural obstacles such as lack of funds, stigma around victims, and delay in court proceedings, all of which reduce the effectiveness of the recommendations made by the committee.
The recommendations made by the committee represent a significant milestone in the journey of recognising the victim’s rights in Indian criminal jurisprudence Although the process of implementation of the same on a larger scale is limited, sustained efforts to implement the recommendations can pave the way for a better future of the victim’s rights in India.
The present scenario
Present scenario regarding victim rights has seen a significant shift, with recognition and emphasis being laid on the importance of victim rights beyond compensations and convictions.
Even though the criminal justice system still follows the adversarial model of jurisprudence, several substantial changes have been made to make it more victim-centred. The existing criminal justice system might use some improvement, and this paradigm shift that equally emphasises the punishment of the accused as well as the rehabilitation and empowerment of those affected by crimes is a welcome development.
The elevation of the role of victims from being marginalised, passive participants as witnesses with limited chances to voice their concerns to the realisation of the impact of the crime beyond mere victimisation to including broader recognition of their rights and needs.
The Criminal Procedure Code of 1973 provides mechanisms that are discussed further to assist the victims in exercising their rights. They are as follows-
Section 357 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (hereinafter Cr.P.C.) deals with the victim’s rights, which include sentencing the accused and imposing a fine for any loss or injury caused to the victim. The pre-requisite for the application of this section relies on the guilt being proved beyond a reasonable doubt by the victim to be implemented. While imposing fines, the court also considers the accused person status quo and, on occasion, reduces the compensation award to the victim.
Section 357A of Cr. P.C. was introduced to address the issues regarding the compensation offered to the victim. The primary aim was to ensure that the victims were awarded adequate compensation for the losses they suffered.
The state government is to establish schemes for victims or their dependents in the event of death or severe injuries caused by the offence. The criteria for executing this scheme depend on the nature and gravity of the offence, which are decided by the court and the financial situation of the offender.
Section 372 of Cr. P.C. allows an appeal against the orders of acquittal, conviction or discharge passed by the court. This was to encourage more active participation by the victims in the investigation and trial process to make their voices heard. This section is crucial in protecting against the miscarriage of justice and making the judiciary more accountable for its decisions. It also promotes transparency and fairness in court proceedings.
By allowing them to challenge the unfavourable outcomes, it upholds the basic rights of the victims and ensures that access to justice or remedies is ensured.
Despite the constraints of resources and structural barriers, the ongoing awareness and advocacy promoting the victim-oriented system to help them realise their rights and facilitate the needs of victims seeks persistent efforts on the part of legislation, advocates and even society to help achieve a lasting change in the system.
Conclusion
India has witnessed an evolution in the segment of victim’s rights, changes in the legal system, societal structure and values. The role of the victim has changed from being the centre point in the ancient era to being sidelined during the British administration. The trajectory of victim rights has come a long way.
In order to ensure a fair and just society, it is imperative that due recognition and support be extended to the victims of crime to express their needs and offer them the right assistance to minimise the aftermath of the crime and allow them the chance to lead a dignified life.