This article is written by Sakshi Tripathi from Banasthali Vidyapith, Rajasthan. This article evaluates the high-value contract negotiation between the parties and preparation for the same.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Each business has clients that they cannot afford to lose. Transforming one of these big brand clients opens the doors to handfuls of other clients from the same alliance—the most straightforward way for dropping the cost on the item or benefit. However, often that will not be sufficient since such clients are used to costing wars, and low ball offers from merchants energetic to trade with them. Negotiation is the method of dispute resolution between parties through mutual understanding and agreement where there is no inclusion of the third party. A negotiation is a contemporary form of dispute resolution. It is a portion of the ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) framework of settling disputes out of court. Contract negotiation has not changed since the advent of email, but new technologies make contract negotiation speedier, more innovative, and less risky.
High-value contract negotiation – meaning and scope
Meaning
Contract negotiation is the method of agreeing on legitimately official terms (here, we will focus on negotiation between two companies). When two companies negotiate, both parties seek to get favourable terms and minimise budgetary, legal, and operational risk.
For illustration, when negotiating contracts with merchants, your company may push for the ability to pay month-to-month instead of every year (or procrastination). In payments, as in numerous other issues, there is not necessarily a “correct” alternative so much as an alternative that creates the foremost sense for your company. We negotiate contracts in trade to guarantee that our assertions set our companies up for long-term success. A famous legal maxim, ‘Consilia Omnia Verbis Prius experiri, quam armis sapientem decet‘, legitimately proposes that a wise man prefers negotiation before utilising arms. The word ‘negotiation’ can be interpreted in several ways, and in this way, the term includes several definitions.
Scope
The negotiation method began a year back during the rulers’ period, and they used to negotiate at the time of a progressing war or avoided war. We are even aware of the negotiation rounds after the two great world wars within the 20th century, which eventually created the League of Nations and the United Nations, respectively. Over time negotiation has expanded its scope. The reason is basically that the parties wish to settle their disputes out of court. The litigation process has several disadvantages that incorporate bulky printed material, excessive time, and delays in settlement preparation. With the increment within the notoriety of the transaction, the request for experienced arbitrators has expanded. There are several cases in which negotiation is applicable.
Marital deadlock
In the pre-litigation process of a marital issue, negotiation is predominant. The self-image and opinions between the spouse and the other spouse in a married relationship are regularly settled by communication amid the negotiation preparation. As of now separated, a couple is additionally prompted to negotiate regarding alimony and the child’s guardianship.
Business negotiation
A business negotiation could be critical expertise to oversee trade and corporate matters. The abilities required in transaction incorporate making bargains, examining the benefits of the company, building a group, negotiating with the representatives and the works, negotiating for contracts, taking care of cases of dispute between clients, representative compensation cases, mergers and acquisitions, settling the costs of different consumer merchandise, negotiation on auction costs, real estate prices and so on. For determining a business agreement, the art of negotiation is fundamental. Trade negotiation is the expertise where the significant issue is broken down into little chunks, and after that, the solution to each problem is carefully found out.
Contract-based negotiation
The contract-based negotiation is the foremost famous negotiation where the parties to a dispute negotiate the terms and the conditions of the contract before entering into legally binding connections. The contract-based negotiations are, to some degree, in line with the trade negotiations. After the breach of the legally binding prerequisites, the deadlock is sometimes settled with the assistance of negotiations.
Administrative negotiation
The negotiations between the distinctive organisations with each other on essential decisions are also within the frame of negotiations. The different negotiations within the dispute between states, organisations, the agencies of the government, the military arrangements, the legislative negotiation. Wherever there is a decision of utmost significance that ought to be taken up, a circular of negotiations with the partners is crucial.
International negotiation
International negotiation is the exchange of the parties in power to attain specific common objectives or dissolve an impasse. Moreover, international negotiations can be a medium to progress international relations, strike a deal, or create an agreement on the point of law. However, records of international negotiations have not continuously appeared to effectively solve the issue at hand and clear the strained relationship.
Ways to prepare for a high-value contract negotiation
Strategies for planning contract negotiations
- List rank of priorities and alternatives: This might keep returning to the negotiation to include other things as it creates contract negotiation techniques. You will not be able to negotiate all areas of the contract at once viably. You will need to be beyond doubt that what is most critical to you is examined and concurred upon before moving to less vital things. You might also want to allude to the least essential things if you have got to allow something to induce your top items.
- Know the distinction between what you would like and what you need: Review your priorities regularly throughout the negotiation planning process and one last time at the conclusion. Be sure to inquire about the difficult questions: “Is this truly a need for our company, or is it a ‘nice to have’?” “Was this need a result of a few inside political moves, or is it for real?”
- Know the foot line to walk away: Is there a cost or hourly fee that the company cannot surpass? It has to realise that one or two of the needs are genuinely non-negotiable, and it will be way better off if you walk absent from this contract if the vendor disagrees? List these at the side of the basis, so they are not forgotten.
- Define any time limitations and benchmarks: It needs to set execution estimation benchmarks that anticipate from the vendor, particularly with substantial ventures. It will need to negotiate a reasonable and even-handed punishment when not met if essential to the business.
- Assess potential liabilities and dangers: What is the potential for something to go off-base? What if unforeseen costs are experienced? Who will be capable on the off chance that government controls are damaged? Whose protections will cover contract workers? These are fair, several of the more common questions that must be tended to in any contract.
- Confidentiality, non-compete, dispute resolution, changes in prerequisites: These are other things that may well be potential negotiation stumbling squares. For illustration, it needs to be beyond any doubt that a secrecy clause is put into the contract if the seller or an employee has the plausibility of being exposed to confidential information.
- The same for the seller (walk a mile in their shoes): Presently, you have completed your business’s contract negotiations planning process. Repeat the same process on the off chance that they were the vendor. What regions are most vital for them? What risks or liabilities will they need to assume? The list will not idealise, but it ought to outline intellect to look at things from another perspective. Usually how extraordinary associations between clients and sellers are built.
Preparation
The following items are reviewed and affirmed before the actual contract negotiations begin:
- Determine whether it requires legal counsel: Negotiating a contract for one year of janitorial administrations in a small office is immensely distinctive, from negotiating a contract to outsource a colossal call centre. Do not hesitate to hold a lawyer specialising in contract negotiations if they feel the slightest bit awkward checking on contract “legalese.”
- On-site or video chat: Concur upon where the negotiation session or sessions will take place. Propose upfront to travel with them and have the upper hand by negotiating at the vendor’s location. Set up a video chat to achieve the negotiation session if the distance is too distant to travel cost-effectively. Make sure it is a video conference since body dialect talks louder than words.
- Ensure the individual representing the vendor has a specialist to negotiate: Ensureother party’s consent that the individuals representing the vendor have the authority to negotiate for the company’s sake before the individuals travel to the vendor’s location or the merchant voyages. It is a tremendous waste of time to listen, “Let me get back to you after I listen to what my boss has got to say about this”, after a long invalidation session.
Things to keep in mind
Tips and tricks
- Break the negotiation into parts: Some negotiations deteriorate since the parties take an “all or nothing” approach, in which the other party must concur to all of their terms to move forward. A great way past this sort of roadblock is to break the transactions into segments (“compartmentalize”) and reach an understanding of each portion independently. It makes them feel like getting a series of solutions — and making progress — instead of engaging in one colossal war.
- The “I am only inquiring for what is reasonable” approach: This approach emphasises that one party’s requests are basically in line with industry measures or current market costs. This technique diminishes the commitment to legitimise the terms or spend time arranging for them. It emphasises merely the inquiring as it were for standard bargain terms. The burden shifts to the other party to persuade simply to make an exception in this case (and to form that particular case worth you are whereas by offering concessions elsewhere).
- The Getting to Yes approach: The authors of this book emphasise that to reach an agreement (to urge “yes”), the negotiating parties must separate the individuals from the issues (that is, remove the emotion from the condition). Look beyond the negotiating parties to see who or what is the genuine interest or impact influencing each party, produce alternatives to form a problem-solving environment, and neutralise conflict by sticking to objective and easy-to-justify standards of fairness.
- Take control: Controlling the location, timing, subjects, and pace of negotiation (sometimes called “controlling the agenda”) may create an advantage. For illustration, legal counsellors frequently accept that the lawyer who drafts the agreement is within the legally binding driver’s situation. Essentially, by controlling the negotiations, get to choose which subjects are examined and in what arrange. In some cases, parties use a passive approach to require control — for example, by appearing to act as the mediator for the negotiations or by advertising to “summarize” where things stand (in a letter or brief explanation at the beginning of a negotiating session). However, no matter how the reins are seized, the party that outlines the issues generally has more control over how those issues are inevitably resolved.
- Prioritise: Contract negotiations ordinarily centre on income and risks. However, some revenues and chances are more imperative than others. Therefore, you need to know your best priorities after the negotiation — ordinarily the business or money-making opportunity offered by the bargain — and how the other preferences rank underneath that. It will assist in keeping an eye on the prize and maintaining a strategic distance from getting impeded down in issues that are not imperative.
- The “offer-concession” procedure: Make sure the other side clears out the negotiation feeling, which has made a great bargain. The offers ought to continuously take off sufficient squirm room to create worthy concessions to the other side. Alternatively, as one businessman put it, “The foremost vital trip you will take in life is an assembly of individuals halfway.” It, too, implies not beginning transactions by uncovering the outright foot line. If your instep takes off the room to negotiate, it will make the other party feel that they have won something — and will be shocked to discover that the other party is willing to grant more than they would have been willing to accept.
- The question instead of demand: In case the other party is taking a hard line on specific issues, inquire why. Questions open up the talk; contentions frequently near communication down.
- Discover points of agreement and conclusion on a positive note: This energetic approach requires discovering opportunities to say, “You are almost right,” or “I concur.” Be that as it may, little these focuses of understanding may be. Nevertheless, they offer assistance to set a collaborative tone. At the same time, if arrangements are spread over a sequence of gatherings, continuously endeavour to conclude each one emphatically. This well goes a long way to set up a collaborative tone that’s more likely to be conducive to advance and result in an agreement.
- Do the investigation: The party with more data, as a rule, has more leverage. In this case, individuals who put an offer on for the house have sold their claim house and must hurry, which will demand a better price, especially if they are willing to close the deal fast. In some cases, individual data about the parties may influence within the capacity to make a more collaborative air (“Hello, I am hustling in that marathon, too.”).
- Managing burnouts and ultimatums: If the other party resorts to threats (“Concur to these terms, or there is no bargain”) or compensates for a war of attrition by dragging out the negotiations, you will have to choose what the basic bargain is truly worth to you. If the extreme prize is so critical that they are willing to acknowledge the other party’s final proposal or put up with perpetual wheeling and dealing, that is fine. Essentially, if the other party has all the control (for example, it is the only known buyer for your item), at that point, you will smile and bear it for a while. In case not, however, the most exemplary methodology is regularly to walk absent from the negotiations. Then, if the other party truly needs it may reevaluate its strategies and return to the table. Then, it will be able to move on to more profitable negotiations with somebody else.
- Utilise facts, not sentiments: Effective mediators isolated trade from an individual, realities from emotions. They maintain a strategic distance from letting a repulsive identity or fashion drag down the negotiations. They also keep a strategic distance from making the negotiations appear individual by utilising dialect such as “I accept” or “I think,” centring on statements of reality (“On the off chance that we pay this cost, both parties to the wander will be at risk.”).
Possible loopholes and ways to mend them
- Power tactic: The parties to negotiation may not continuously be of equal stature and control. Within the nonappearance of an impartial third party, the party that is in a position to rule employs the scope to lead over the other party’s consent and hence come to an understanding. This play of powers, therefore, may impede the arrangement preparation. The result may be an outline assertion that afterwards can be consigned to be useless.
- Unequal agreement: The agreement that the parties arrive at the negotiation time can be unequal when there is one maybe an effective party than the other.
- Impasse: The debate and contradiction between the parties some of the time lead to a deadlock. A deadlock could be a circumstance at the time of transaction when the parties to an understanding come to a stop in their dialogue, where they cannot proceed with their conversation any longer. It could be an arrangement of the dissatisfaction of the parties’ dialogue wherein the parties where no possible fruitful results can happen. However, for the most part, it occurs when one of the parties is so unyielding over its objectives that no centre ground can be achieved.
- Walkout situation: The walkout circumstance happens when a deadlock baffles the parties to the degree that no productive dialogue can happen any longer. The parties in such cases may storm out of the room and terminate arrangements any further.
- Strained relations: The unsuccessful rounds of transactions some of the time lead to intensity within the relationship. The parties are not prepared to come for another circular of arrangements and fall flat to reach an agreement at all.
- Backing off: The unsuccessful negotiations lead to creating terrible relations in conjunction with the end of any other trade and contractual relations altogether a short time later. A few parties now and then lose certainty within the preparation of arrangement to prepare for debate resolution and consider other options.
- Not all issues are negotiable: Some cases include numerous partners that are non-negotiable. These cases specifically go to court.
Conclusion
The final stage within the merchant choice handle includes creating a contract negotiation technique. The most exceedingly lousy contract negotiation objective is to drain each last cent of the merchant for the lowest price. Keep in mind the need to “partner” with your seller so both of you will meet your corporate objectives and targets. Successful contract negotiation implies that both sides search for positives that advantage both parties in each area while still accomplishing a reasonable and equitable bargain. A signed contract that benefits both parties will give a firm foundation to construct a long-lasting relationship with the vendor.
References
- https://www.legalbites.in/negotiation-meaning-scope-adv-dis/
- https://ironcladapp.com/journal/contract-management/what-is-contract-negotiation/
- https://hbr.org/2015/07/how-to-negotiate-with-powerful-suppliers
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:
