This article is written by Vanshika Arora on the topic CSR: Environment and Sustainable Development used to pursue development through the initial days of a firm.


The procedure of Corporate Social Responsibility, as a criterion for both firms as well as businesses, to pursue development through its initial days, as a motto that was believed to be trendy by some corporations heeding it to the current day truths of the  21st century, is where it is no longer fashionable.

This development was necessitated both due to the myriad crises that we as a class face which has completely reversed the atmosphere under which the corporations function and a culmination between business governors that gains as the exclusive motive or reason d’être for life can no longer hold welfare.

Download Now

The justification of why firms should look beyond revenues due to the bizarre problem that society discovers itself in the following decade of the 21st century. Bestowed by the political, financial, sociable and environmental dilemmas that humans are enduring, corporations have their own part to play as they provide extensively to the financial well being of people and also affect the political and social fads. Corporate Social Responsibility brings about prominent business connotation also when considered the knock-on effect that social and environmental responsibility brings to the businesses.

For example, companies subsist in a symbiotic connection with their environment where their trade within such a vaster environment infers to a huge expanse how generously they do in their profit-seeking endeavours.  

The business need for corporate social responsibility 

Corporate social responsibility also makes economic sense when you consider the impact of social and environmental responsibility on business. For example, companies exist in a symbiotic relationship with their environment (the term environment refers to all components of the external environment, not just the ecological environment), and their exchange with the wider environment largely determines how well they perform in their search efforts. 

Given that the RBV (Resource-based view) or the company’s resource-based perspective depends on how well the company is in harmony with the external environment and how the exchange of inputs and outputs with the environment determines the quality of its business, this may have happened to conclude that socially responsible business practices are really in the best interest companies and that arguments against the introduction of hidden social taxes for companies through socially responsible business practices may not be good in the modern business landscape.

In fact, the world has changed so much since the Friedman era that socially responsible business practices must be the norm and not the exception, and the readings examined for this document seem to indicate that it is time for companies to engage in responsible behaviour. However, there is a tendency to treat CSR as a different business price and therefore similar to a business. The integration of ideas may not lead to the desired effect unless the media, business, and citizens understand what it is and act accordingly. Verbal or corporate use of CSR ideas may not be the expected results of supporters and stakeholders who promote the idea. Instead, changing attitudes and attitudes is what these groups mean when they demand socially responsible practices.

Elsewhere it is stated that CSR must be incorporated as a concept and paradigm in the company’s DNA and if the material itself resonates with social responsibility threads. The goal of conscious capitalism and the loving company is realized.

The gentle wave of the finger is thanks to those who believe that, because the concept of CSR is included, they can relax from the knowledge that the company will do the rest. Given the history of nonprofit and mercantilist behaviour, where moods and ideas come and go, but the nature of the company mutates and doesn’t fundamentally change, we still have the distance to cover the goals of CSR ideas. In addition, we must not be in a situation where the necessities of the 21st-century force companies to change their behaviour. In contrast, voluntary mindset changes are more appropriate given the extraordinary resources that companies have and those they use to fight change and frustrate those who push for the law to do so.

The role played by CSR in attaining Sustainable development

The term corporate social responsibility (CSR) means that a corporation should be accountable to a community and shareholders, for its actions and operations. It aims to demonstrate a goal of upholding ethical values, respecting people, communities and the environment. The corporation undertakes to monitor its compliance with its stated CSR policy and report this with the same frequency that it reports its financial resource.


  •  Profitability and Value

The introduction of energy efficiencies and waste recycling cuts operational costs and benefits the environment. CSR increases company accountability and its transparency with investment analysts and the media, shareholders and local communities. This, in turn, enhances its reputation among investors such as mutual funds that integrate CSR into their stock selection. The result is a virtuous circle where the company’s stock value increases and its access to investment capital are eased.

  • Better Customer Relations

A majority of consumers think that companies should be socially responsible. Consumers are drawn to those companies that have a reputation of being a good corporate citizen. Research at Tilburg University in the Netherlands showed that consumers are prepared to pay a 10 per cent higher price for products they deem to be socially responsible.


  • Conflicts with the Profit Motive

A company’s management has a fiduciary duty to its shareholders, and CSR directly opposes this, since the responsibility of executives to shareholders is to maximize profits. A manager who forsakes profits in favour of some benefits to society may expect to lose his job and be replaced by someone for whom profits are a priority. This view led Nobel-Prize winning economist Milton Friedman to write a classic article with the title: “The Social Responsibility Of Business Is to Increase Its Profits.”(Friedman’s critique)

  •  Consumers are Wise to Greenwashing

Greenwashing is considered an unsubstantiated claim to deceive consumers into believing that a company’s products are environmentally friendly. For example, a product may be labelled as “All Natural”, even though it is being manufactured just as it always has. Some customers may react positively to these types of claims, but others are wary of corporate greenwashing

Economic aspects 

Under the general term “Corporate Social Responsibility” (CSR), corporate obligations, two contradictory positions can appear: On one hand, there is the argument that resources spent on other economic purposes constitute a waste of illegitimate resources because they conflict with the company’s responsibility to shareholders and thus even the true function of business in modern society. On the other hand, supporters of CSR try to support their ideas by emphasizing what are called CSR business cases. They argue that there may be certain benefits to CSR that exceed costs, and see CSR as a business need, not least because of their own economic interests.

This term is very important because if it turns out CSR and beneficial interests go hand in hand, two conflicts can be resolved. First, at the conceptual level (economists’ argument) towards CSR as illegitimate expenses, they lose their basis and the two conflicting positions are finally combined. Second, in practice, managers can justify the costs of CSR for shareholders not only in terms of their moral quality but also in terms of their economic benefits.

Likewise, investors need not worry about the compromise between their expectations for maximum investment returns on the one hand and ethical considerations on the other. Although this parallel between public involvement and private business interests does not provide empirical support, there is a risk that it will be in line with the wishes of its supporters and not a credible fact that can serve as a basis for management decisions. Therefore, a deep understanding of the economic impact of CSR is very important for academic debate and practice.


Instead of starting a business and looking at the world to see what ethical commitments are, stakeholder theory starts in the world. He lists and explains people and groups who are affected (or affected) by the company’s actions and asks: “What are your lawsuits against the company?” “What are your rights in relation to company actions?” Can they properly assume the responsibilities and duties of a particular company? “In one sentence, stakeholder theory confirms that those whose lives have been influenced by the company have the right and obligation to participate in its management.

When a factory produces industrial waste, the prospect of CSR, for example, is directly related to the factory owner to dispose of waste safely. Instead, stakeholder theorists start with people in the surrounding community whose environment can be poisoned, and talk about business ethics by asserting that they have the right to clean air and water. In other words, community members are stakeholders in the company and their voice must contribute to the company’s decision. It is true that they may not own shares, but they have the moral right to participate in the decision-making process.

This is a very important point. At least in theoretical form, those who are affected by the company’s actions actually become shareholders and owners. Because they are influenced by company actions, they have the right to participate in their management:

  • Business proprietors, whether a confidential individual or shareholders.
  • Company employees.
  • Consumers and conceivable subordinates of the firm.
  • Suppliers and possible suppliers to the corporation.
  • Everyone in the residence of the borough who may have been influenced by contamination from workplace methods.
  • Creditors whose wealth or entrusted welfares are eclectic into the company’s warfares.
  • Authority commodities implicated in restriction and surcharge.

Regional industries serving company employees (restaurants where lunch employees, grocery stores where employees’ families shop, and the like).

Other companies in the same business compete for market share.

Other companies may be subject to new and potentially burdensome regulations due to pollution at this Massachusetts plant. The five most important on the list – shareholders, employees, customers, suppliers and the public – can be identified as the five main actors.

In an abstract sense, it may be true that everyone in the world is considered a participant in every large factory – we all breathe the same air and because the global economy is closely related, decisions can be made in conference rooms in the small town of the East Coast to eventually spend one’s work costs in India.

Steps taken around the world

XEROX – Community participation program

In 2018, XEROX was included in the “100 Best Corporate Citizens List” by “Corporate Responsibility” magazine for the twelfth consecutive year.

The company participated in various Green Alliance CSR initiatives to participate in a citizen coalition for the electronics industry.

However, we would like to highlight their other social responsibility activities – the XEROX Community Participation Program (XCIP).

XCIP is the longest program of its kind and uses a “global” CSR approach. Xerox uses this initiative to fund employees in their local communities to make changes to projects of their choice. Since 2012 they have sponsored more than 18,000 projects with more than 400,000 participants.

Xerox is a global company, but it makes perfect sense to give employees control over the program. They are able to identify real needs in their community because they live in it. Like when they were building shelves in a food bank in Maui or helping with the tornado disaster in Alabama and raising awareness of breast and cervical cancer in small towns in Poland. In addition, employees can take paid leave under the program to focus fully on social projects as part of their social service programs.

Chipotle and Intermarché – extraordinary fruits and vegetables

Food waste statistics are shocking.

According to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization:

About one-third of the food produced worldwide is lost or lost every year.

Food and waste losses were around $ 680 billion in industrialized countries and $ 310 billion in developing countries.

Fruits and vegetables have the highest proportion of waste.

TOMS shoes – one for the campaign

The founder of TOMS, the story of Blake Mikoski, must now be widely known.

Mycoskie was touched by the difficulties of Argentinian children who grew up without shoes and launched TOMS with a simple idea – to combine every pair of shoes sold with a new pair of children in need.

But what began as a shoe company has grown into an extraordinary, socially responsible organization, as the company itself has described:

“… helps address the needs and progress in health, education, and economic opportunities for children and their communities throughout the world.”

Some examples of these non-shoe initiatives are:

With TOMS Eyewear, they have helped more than 400,000 people see again.

TOMS Roasting Co. Provides more than 335,000 weeks of clean water in 6 countries.

TOMS Bag Collection supports safe delivery services by training qualified mothers and distributing childbirth packages with items that help women give birth safely.

Juntos – Educational backpacks and school supplies for each pair of shoes sold

The Juntos initiative is based on a principle similar to TOMS: for each pair of shoes sold, the company donates a backpack full of school supplies to a child in Ecuador.

Each backpack contains school supplies for the year – pencils, pens, rulers and notebooks.

But why Ecuador? Because Juntos El Zapato de Lona, Schuhstraße in Ecuador, produces and sells. They believe in returning to a place that inspires their company. 

Patagonia – supply chain: footprints

Patagonia is an outside company dedicated to environmental protection. According to them: “As our company grows, we face this challenge: the more we produce, the greater the impact on the environment. If we want to inspire and implement solutions to the environmental crisis, as stated in our mission, we need our overall impact to reduce regardless of the number of products we sell. “

To this end, they strive to be as transparent as possible and to deal with various environmental and social issues at each step of their supply chain. As an example:

Material source: Patagonia only switched to the use of organic cotton in 1994 and established close relationships with cotton farmers to ensure quality. They are also known for their tracked standards, which also work with farmers to ensure that ducks in their down jackets are protected from forced feeding and live to pick.to documentary work: Patagonia works with many factories to produce clothing and works to find ways to ensure that employees receive not only minimum wages but also transition wages. They recognize that this is difficult to achieve and that they have not achieved their goals, but they continue to work for it.

Climate change initiatives: Patagonia not only ensures that they use renewable energy, work in environmentally-friendly buildings and measure their carbon footprint, but also supports active activists with what is called an earth tax. They donate 1% of their sales to environmental protection measures.


  • Adopt a business code of ethics

The Code of Business Ethics describes employee behaviour on topics such as ethics, values, environment, diversity, respect for employees and customer service.

More and more entrepreneurs are choosing to move forward by changing their governance documents to reflect their commitment to social and environmental goals.

  •  Follow a health and safety program

By creating a clear health and safety program at work, you can create a reliable system to protect your employees and prevent accidents and injuries. It also ensures that you comply with government health and safety regulations.

  •  Commit to protecting the environment

Develop policies and practices that allow your company to fulfill its environmental commitments. For example, you can create a report that documents your activities and results because they are related to your environmental impact. Some companies produce more comprehensive sustainability reports on social, economic, and ecological activities.

  • Get your supplier

Make sure your supplier knows and meets your expectations about responsible behavior for issues such as fair prices. Check them to determine your past behavior and tell them what to expect.

  •  Be sure to donate money

Stand behind the causes that are important to your company. For example, forest companies can support organizations that protect the environment. Many manufacturing companies contribute to urban organizations in cities where they have factories. The idea is to return to the community and at the same time send a message about your brand values.

  • Verification of B Corp certification

Many entrepreneurs and community-based communities choose the B Corp certificate. B Corps is a “profitable” certified company. Their goal is to create value for society and money. They meet high standards in terms of transparency and accountability and create positive social and environmental benefits.


In short, CSR must be included in the way various activities in the corporate sector work. This must be their way of life. In more open terms, CSR does not mean “making money through hooks or fraudsters and redirecting some of it as an act of tax savings or on behalf of social welfare measures”. Such an approach is contrary to Mahatma Gandhi’s vision, which views CSR as an ethical action.

Ethics requires purified thoughts which lead to purified thoughts which will lead to purified actions. So cleanliness must be at the beginning, during the process and at the end of all CSR activities. There are various activities such as design, planning, production, marketing, personnel development, and quality assurance, which must be done by companies in the corporate sector. If you do all these activities at the right time with the right people, you will get the right product that meets customer needs. Such companies will be truly socially responsible and will not hesitate to divert some of their profits to the common good.


LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here