In this article, Ashwini Gehlot of Institute of Law, Nirma University Ahmedabad discusses the Punishment For Possession Of Illegal Drugs And Narcotic Substances?
Caught in the endless loop of substance abuse, India is home to roughly 3 million medication addicts. The National Crime Records Bureau’s information, as distributed in 2014, revealed that India witnesses almost 10 suicides once a day because of substance addiction.
India passed the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, (NDPS Act) in 1985 which was consequently amended in 1989, 2001 and recently, in 2014. India’s driving against anti-drug law endorses firm punishments for drug traffickers and rehabilitation for the users. Surrounded with the purpose to battle drug trafficking, it denies and criminalizes the production, cultivation, possession, sale, use, purchase, import and export, and consumption of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. It gives immunity in circumstances where the medications are used for scientific or medical purposes.
The NDPS Act appeared to conceive strict punishments for drug trafficking, to expand implementation powers, implement international convention that India is associated with and to direct psychotropic substances. A predominantly reformatory statute, NDPS furnishes the regulation of drugs. It expresses that capital punishment can be granted as a form of punishment under the Act. The 2014 amendment held that the decision to grant capital punishment lies at the discretion of the court and rather stipulates 30 years of detainment as a substitute.
With a specific end goal to supplement the NDPS Act, the Prevention of Illicit Trafficking in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act came into existence in 1988. It contains provisions relating to the preventive detention of any and each person who is associated with or accused of drug trafficking.
The worry for combatting drug trafficking magnifies once the judiciary started to rely on Article 47 of the Indian Constitution, which endorses the restriction on the utilization of drugs and directs the State to endeavor to decrease and abolish the utilization of drugs, with the exception of when it is utilized for scientific purposes. The present legislation covers three classes of substances, which are psychotropic substances (LSD, Amphetamines, MDMA Methamphetamines), narcotic drugs (poppy straw, cocoa leaf, cannabis, and opium) and controlled substances (utilized for the production of any psychotropic substance or the narcotic drug).
Drug Law Enforcement Agencies In India
- Narcotics Control Division
- Central Bureau of Narcotics (CBN)
- The Narcotic Control Bureau (NCB )
- Other Agencies- Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Central Bureau of Investigation, Customs Commission, Border Security Force.
Legislative Policies In India In Drug Related Matters
The broad legislative policy in the issue is mentioned in the three Central Acts, viz.
- The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985,
- Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988,
- Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940,
Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
India is a party to the 3 United Nations drug convention that is – “The 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances (1971 Convention)”, “The 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs (1961 Convention)”, and “The 1988 Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (1988 Convention).”
The official record expresses that the NDPS Act was instituted with a specific end goal to give adequate penalties for strengthened enforcement powers, drug trafficking, and to execute international conventions to which India is a member, and uphold controls over psychotropic substances. Three times amendment was made in this Act i.e. in 1989, 2001 and currently, in 2014.
The NDPS Act restricts/prohibits the production, cultivation, sale, possession, trade, purchase, use, consumption and import/export of psychotropic substances and narcotic drugs except scientific or medicinal as per the law.
The Act covers three wide classes of substances:
- Psychotropic Substances or those secured under the 1971 Convention and also other psychoactive substances, for example, ketamine which is not yet grouped under 3 international convention;
- Narcotic Drugs, that is, those secured under the 1961 Convention;
- “Controlled Substances” that are utilized to make psychotropic substances or narcotic drugs.
NDPS Amendments, 2014
The NDPS Act was amended in early 2014 for the 3rd time and some new provisions come into force from on 1 May 2014. The principal highlights include:
- Creation of another class of “essential narcotic drugs”, which the central government can regulate and determine consistently throughout the country.
- Widening the goal of the law from containing unlawful use to promoting the scientific and medical use of psychotropic substances and narcotic drugs.41 with regards to the rule of “balance” amongst control and accessibility of narcotic drugs that supports the international drug control treaties.
- Including the expressions “recognition and approval” of the treatment center and “management” of drug dependence, in this manner permitting for the foundation of lawfully binding treatment standards and proof/evidence based medical interventions.
- Making capital punishment optional for a subsequent offense including a specific amount of drugs U/S 31A. The court will have some other alternatives to impose detainment/imprisonment for a term of 30 years under this section.
- Increased punishment from a maximum of 6 months imprisonment to 1-year imprisonment for small quantity offenses.
- Authorizing private sector inclusion in the processing concentrated poppy straw and opium.
- Raising the rank of officers approved to conduct arrest and search permit holders for affirmed NDPS violations.
- More detailed provisions for relinquishment of the property of people summoned on charges of drug trafficking.
Punishment For offenses
NDPS Act considers drug offenses as very grave and serious in nature and so, punishments for them are very stiff. Offenses under this Act are cognizable and non-bailable. The quantum of sentence and fine differs with the offense. For most of the offenses, the punishment relies upon the quantity of drug included – little amount, more than little however not as much as the business amount or business amount of drugs. Commercial and small amounts are notified for each drug.
Under NDPS Act, criminal conspiracy, abetment and even attempt to carry out an offense pull in the same punishment as the offense itself. Habitual or repeat offenses attracts 1 and half times the punishment and capital punishment in some cases. Since the punishments under this Act are rigid and inflexible, a few procedural safeguards have been given in the Act. A few immunities are additionally accessible under the Act.
Quantity And Punishments
Offences And Penalties
|Offenses||Penalty||Sections of the Act|
|Cultivation of coca plants or opium, cannabis without license||Punishment is-Rigorous imprisonment-up to 10 years + fine up to Rs.1 lakh||Opium – 18(c) Cannabis – 20 Coca-16|
|Embezzlement of opium by licensed farmer||Rigorous imprisonment -10 to 20 years + fine Rs. 1 to 2 lakhs (regardless of the quantity)||19|
|Manufacture, production, sale, possession, transport, purchase, import/export inter- state, or use of psychotropic substances and narcotic drugs.||for small quantity of drugs, the punishment is rigorous imprisonment up to 6 months or fine of Rs. 10,000 or both. More than little quantity but less than business quantity – Rigorous imprisonment. up to 10 years + fine up to Rs. 1 Lakhs. Commercial/Business quantity – Rigorous imprisonment 10 to 20 years + fine Rs. 1 to 2 Lakhs||Prepared opium-17 Opium – 18 Cannabis – 20 Manufactured drugs or their preparations-21 Psychotropic substances -22|
|Import/export or transshipment of psychotropic substances narcotic drugs.||Same as above||23|
|External dealings in NDPS-i.e. Controlling and engaging in trade whereby drugs are supplied to an individual outside India and also drugs are obtained from outside India.||Rigorous imprisonment 10 to 20 years + fine of Rs. 1 to 2 lakhs (Regardless of the quantity)||24|
|Knowingly allowing one’s premises to be used for committing an offense||Same as for the offense||25|
|Violations pertaining to controlled substances (precursors)||Rigorous imprisonment up to 10 years + fine Rs. 1 to 2 lakhs||25A|
|Financing traffic and harboring offenders||Rigorous imprisonment 10 to 20 years + fine Rs. 1 to 2 lakhs||27A|
|Attempts, abetment and criminal conspiracy||Same as for the offense||Attempts-28 Abetment and criminal conspiracy – 29|
|Preparation to commit an offense||Half the punishment for the offense||30|
|Repeat offense||In most of the cases, the punishment is One and half times the penalty for the offense. And death penalty in some cases.||31 Death – 31A|
|Consumption of drugs||Morphine, cocaine, heroin -Punishment is Rigorous imprisonment up to 1 year or fine up to Rs. 20,000 or both. And for consumption of some other drugs- Imprisonment up to 6 months or fine up to Rs. 10,000 or both. And there is immunity from the legal proceedings provided to addicts if he/she volunteering for treatment.||27 Immunity – 64A|
|Punishment for violations not elsewhere specified||Imprisonment up to six months or fine or both||32|
Examples In Indian Judiciary
- February 2012: Chandigarh district court sentences Paramjit Singh, discovered with 10 kg of heroin in 2007, to death. In 1998 he had been captured with 1.02 kg of heroin.
- February 2008: Ahmedabad sessions court sentences Omkarnath Kak, found with 28 kg of charas in 2003, to death. In 1988, Kak had been captured for having 40kg of charas.
- December 2007: A Mumbai special court grants death sentence to Ghulam Malik, found with 142 kg of hashish in 2004. Approx 1.8 kg of hashish had been recuperated from Malik on a prior event.
Immunity In Drug Cases
- Officers acting in the discharge of their duties in good faith under the Act are exempted from legal proceedings, suits and other prosecution (Section 69).
- Addicts accused with consumption of drugs under section 27 or with offenses including little quantities will be exempted or protected from any prosecution if they volunteer for dead-diction. This exception might be withdrawn if the addict does not undertake complete treatment (Section 64 A ). It is important to note that it is not obligatory that the drug, if any, found with the addict in little quantity, require not be for personal use.
- Offenders State or Central governments can delicate immunity to a wrongdoer in order to get his evidence in the case.This immunity is allowed by the government and not by the court (Section 64).
- Minors, offenses committed under any law by individual less than 18 years old will be secured by the Juvenile Persons (Care and Protection) Act. This Act seeks to ameliorate such juveniles instead of punishing them under the respective Acts. It prevails over any other Act in regard to people underneath the age of 18. Subsequently, such persons cannot be prosecuted under the NDPS Act too.
Loopholes in The Act And Suggestions
Referred to as a hasty piece of enactment that was passed under tremendous pressure, India’s chief law to handle drug trafficking isn’t free from pitfalls. It doesn’t have a reasonable outline between the definition of an addict and a consumer. The definitions set up is neither backed by laws nor by ethics. It notices terms like use, possession, and consumption yet neglect to illustrate what they truly mean. The non-appearance of any political initiative in setting up machinery sanctioned to enforce and regulate rehabilitation acts as a bottleneck. The scarcity of related institutions in charge of training the judicial machinery, the insufficient rehabilitation facilities and such factors have advanced the inadequacy of law to deal with the widespread drug menace in India. The ineffectual enforcement of the statute and the deficiency of rehabilitative organization has only added to the rundown of shortcomings. Brutal and stringent, the statute intensely hampers the criminal justice system.
The strictness of the NDPS Act is revealed by the provision for granting capital punishment in instances of repeated offenses, similar to the manufacture, production, transportation, possession and import/export of drugs.
The lack of data and statistics regarding drug addiction in no way whatsoever arises from the absence of substance abuse. A glaring gap, the range of drug abuse and its consequences on one’s health and overall well-being remains an unchartered territory. The paucity of data with respect to the nature and extent of drug dependence, which are key factors to be examined before formulating drug policies, hinders the accomplishment of the statute’s objective.
Provisions of criminalizing the utilization of drugs, punishing the possession of drugs for individual utilize, imposing the death penalty and other different aspects of the enactment are far harsher than those specified in the UN drug control convention. Despite the endeavors taken by civil society groups to show the incapability of these extreme provisions, legislators have neither surveyed nor replaced these systems. Drug policy execution is attempted by the state and central governments, as well as by ministries. Thus, this offers to ascend to circumstances of abandoning one’s duty and overlapping in the enforcement.
Unless viable measures are taken quickly, the reformative aim of the legislation will go futile. In spite of the fact that illuminating presences and society’s representatives can be brought in to recommend and evaluate changes in the drug policy, these measures have not yet been put into utilization. Inspecting the cruel provisions and respecting the privileges of each one of those people who rely upon drugs is an unquestionable requirement. Reinforcing the connection between Government divisions and reaching common society representation, for example, medical experts and patient groups can uphold viable plan of drug policies. Conducting research and accumulating information on drug dependence, substance use and the repercussion on the health of the individuals who infuse/inject drugs can help to stand for the war against drug abuse. The transformation of the NDPS Act itself is the principal walk to be taken if the Government genuinely tries to reaffirm its dedication towards wiping out India’s drug crisis.
- com. (2017). ‘High’ time Indian drug laws are sent to rehab. [online] Available at: http://www.legallyindia.com/views/entry/high-time-the-drug-law-is-sent-to-rehab [Accessed 17 Jul. 2017].
- gov.in. (2014). Punishment for offenses |. [online] Available at: http://www.dor.gov.in/Punishment_for_offenses [Accessed 17 Jul. 2017].
- Rao, P. (n.d.). Drug Laws In India. [online] http://www.antidrugs.gov.il. Available at: http://www.antidrugs.gov.il/download/files/indian_drug-laws.pdf [Accessed 17 Jul. 2017].
- Anon, (n.d.). [online] Available at: http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/18155/12/12_chapter6.pdf [Accessed 17 Jul. 2017].
- Tandon, T. (2015). Drug policy In India. [online] http://idhdp.com. Available at: http://idhdp.com/media/400258/idpc-briefing-paper_drug-policy-in-india.pdf [Accessed 17 Jul. 2017].
- The Telegraph. (2012). Crime and punishment. [online] Available at: https://www.telegraphindia.com/1120314/jsp/opinion/story_15247652.jsp [Accessed 17 Jul. 2017].