This article is written by Daisy Jain, pursuing B.COM.LLB (Hons) from the Institute of Law, Nirma University. This is an exhaustive article which deals with legal ethics in the pandemic era.
Table of Contents
Meaning of legal ethics
The term “ethics” originated from the Greek word “ethos” (character) and from the Latin word “mores” which means custom. They work in tandem to characterize how members of society choose to communicate with one another. In philosophy, ethics describe what is beneficial to the person and community and create the scope of the obligations that individuals and groups bear to each other.Â
Ethics and the legal profession frequently coexist. The legal profession is an honorable one. The legal profession’s nobility is upheld by those who pursue it, adhering to a wide range of professional standards. It is referred to as legal ethics or legal profession ethics.Â
The principles of legal ethics may indeed be described as rules of behavior, verbally or in writing, that govern a practitioner lawyer’s conduct toward oneself, his client, his opponent in statute and the honorable court.
Legal ethics is a phrase that refers to a code of conduct that governs appropriate professional conduct and establishes the nature of a person’s and society’s liabilities.Â
Legal profession and legal ethics
First and foremost, judges and lawyers are essential for the formulation and application of the law. Also, the rule of law has its origin from the principles of equity, fairness and justice. If the judges and lawyers do not abide by and encourage these principles of equity and ethics, the law will be brought into great misconduct, and people will then turn to substitute methods of conflict resolution with an increase in public dissatisfaction, and therefore, the rule of law will be undermined.
Secondly, lawyers have noble profession. This principle exemplifies the idea that challenges of ethical duty and obligation are fundamental to the legal profession and must be addressed as such. It’s been said that the cohesive prestige of a noble profession like this, as well as the optimism it continues to inspire, is perhaps the most important commodity. The legal profession, in particular, must be able to inspire optimism in the general public.
In addition, legal ethics require that attorneys conduct themselves in an honorable and fair manner with their clients and opponents. For instance, the fee charged by attorneys must be reasonable and equitable. The high cost of legal representation discourages the general public from using the legal system to safeguard their rights. It is an abuse of the advocate-client relationship built on trust and respect between the two parties.
Regulation of the behavior of lawyers in India
The Bar Council of India provides for a certain set of professional standards that an advocate needs to comply with. These rules and regulations for lawyers under Section 49 of Advocates Act, 1961 along with the set of conduct and standards which every lawyer is obligated to follow, are mentioned under Chapter II of Part IV of Bar Council of India Rules. The sections of Chapter II of of Part IV of Bar Council of India Rules are mentioned below which state the standard of professional conduct and etiquette:-
Section I – Duty towards the CourtÂ
- An advocate must uphold his reverence and integrity towards the court if he is portraying in his case or as an audience. An advocate must therefore not be submissive and it should also be his responsibility to send his concerns to the suitable officials even when there is an adequate basis for a legitimate issue against the judicial officer.Â
An advocate must remain civil. He cannot behave inappropriately as it spoils the court’s integrity, the court is a good place to come to pursue justice. An advocate cannot impact the judge’s verdict or visit the judge personally to interact to give the ruling in his favor.
- A lawyer can use his perfect efforts to accomplish the case, but he can’t engage in any unethical competition and should teach his client how to respond in court and with an adversary. The lawyer shouldn’t be the client’s spokesperson but should inform the client concerning the court processes and mechanisms.Â
They must retain the language during the argument in court. A lawyer should show up in the stipulated attire. This recommended dress code must not be worn outside the court or in an open area and it should only be stretched when the Indian Bar Council allows certain ceremonial events.
Section II – Duty towards client
- A lawyer should preserve his correlation with his client, especially financially. Money plays an essential part in every profession. Even the lawyer takes money, but this doesn’t imply that this career path is only centered on money, but it is a cognitive service. Contract terms govern the attorney-client correlation in India.
- A client selects a lawyer relying on his professional outcomes hoping he’s the perfect individual to represent his preferences. An advocate concurs if the defendant intends to spend a certain amount, if the client does not make a payment, the lawyer may sue him.
A client wants that his lawyer is devoted solely to work, is hard-working and well-reputed. Even with his hectic schedule, a client can freely consult his lawyer and discuss issues. An advocate can reject a stubborn client.
The advocate should pay close attention to his client’s issue and make the complaint accordingly. Under Rule 33 of the Bar Council of India, an advocate must not alter the parties as per the rule of professional and judicial etiquette.
Section III – Duty towards the opponent
- A lawyer is not expected to visit the opponent and must not conduct any other kind of bargaining on the subject matter and the case and if he intends to explain some specifications, he only has to specify the opponent and is not supposed to interact with the opponent.Â
Quite often the lawyers promise the opponent party that they may come down for a resolution or mediation, but a lawyer could only go to settlement through the other party’s lawyer and not by directly approaching the opponent.Â
- A lawyer should not interfere with an opponent’s lawyer as they have the authority to cross-examine, argue and confirm the documents as this might ruin the court’s civility and integrity. If a lawyer has to object, he is required to tell the judge. No lawyer has the right to prevent a judge from following the course of argument presented by the opponent.
- A lawyer should establish sportsmen enthusiasm because the case includes two parties and each advocate works hard to get a decision in their favor and may be defeated. A lawyer should always establish an outlook of equal rights because all lawyers are equal in court, no lawyer should condemn any lawyer including the opponent’s lawyer as it will ruin the ambience of advocacy, court hearings and justice administration.
Section IV – Duty towards colleagues
- A lawyer cannot show up in a situation in which the other advocate’s name occurs on a memo. To do just that, he should first receive approval from the lawyer and if that approval is not accepted, he should register an application with the honorable court describing why he requires approval. A colleague is a phrase used to refer to all Bar Association members. A lawyer must honor and abstain from condemning all colleagues.Â
The responsibilities the advocate must fulfill are called professional ethics. An advocate who fails to satisfy these duties has infringed on professional ethics ideals. These are the moral responsibilities that all must uphold, not just advocates, but even individuals in other areas because morality and ethics are crucial to everyone in society.
Virtual courts due to the pandemic
Concerning the legal profession, Covid-19 has impacted many lawyers in a negative manner. This was because only emergency cases have been dealt with by the courts through virtual hearings. In virtual hearings, the number of cases heard was decreased, constraining the work done by lawyers. The junior lawyers of the Bar were the most affected.Â
The Bar and the Bar Associations have made attempts to assist the lawyers who are in need by implementing numerous financial support initiatives for lawyers and expanding assistance for the payment of medical expenditures for Covid-19 infections, but this is still not enough.Â
The Delhi Bar Council has also bought oxygen cylinders to support members in an emergency. The Indian Bar Council lodged a petition last year with the Apex Court to pursue financial help and support lawyers following the pandemic, but a verdict remains underway.
The virtual courts had a lot of benefits, for example, they reduced the environmental impact of court proceedings. They also saved expenses as it reduced the need for the litigants and lawyers to go to the courts. It also provided the parties with openness regarding the place of proceedings and facilitates available online.Â
They provided direct exposure to court orders. It appears that courts in India post-pandemic will provide a healthy balance between virtual and physical systems. But the issue persists. In India, the Bar Council itself said that upto 90% of lawyers are not technology-friendly and fully prepared for these digital advancements. While several councils of State Bars have made laudable efforts, they have still not proved to be very effective.
However, the selected 10 percent, who were able to easily access the courts have ensured that the courts in the country remain constantly diligent on their citizens’ fundamental human rights.
Lawyers and legal ethics in virtual courts
Because of the coronavirus outbreak, which resulted in a nationwide lockdown to prevent the virus’ spread, the Supreme Court had planned to conduct court proceedings virtually through video conferencing. Although the judges, attorneys and lawyers are gradually becoming accustomed to virtual proceedings, the video conferencing proceedings have produced some humorous instances.Â
There were even some incivile incidents that have taken place during the video conferencing in the courts. In one such recent court hearing which was held through video conferencing in the Supreme Court, the judges and the public were taken aback when a lawyer appeared up on the screen without wearing his shirt.Â
Although the presence lasted only a few seconds, it was sufficient to cause bafflement among those who were present. Controlling the access to live court hearings has resulted in some humorous incidents in the past and it isn’t the first time it has happened. While participating in a virtual proceeding carried via video conferencing, many lawyers have indeed been observed smoking hookah or even relaxing on the bed.
It is common for the attorneys to sign-in on the application several minutes before the proceeding is due to begin. They also need to double-check and make certain that their audio connection is working properly. Some people, nevertheless, who are not familiar with the process of video conferencing end up doing something else instead.
Need for professionalism – online and offline
In times of the pandemic, it is the duty of an advocate who is involved in a noble profession, to keep his ethics entitled to him. The deficit of the honor and dignity of the legal profession results in a lack of reverence for the court system and the law.Â
People have lost faith in the justice system and they presume that no action will be taken in the event of a complaint. If justice is established in society, individuals will begin to take steps to address their concerns on an individual basis.Â
People have taken the law into their own hands and are not willing to indulge in the judicial process. As a result, property and lives are destroyed and society as a whole is brought to its knees.Â
Legal ethics necessitates the ethical conduct of the legal profession to prevent the destruction of society. The Bar and the Bench are required to work cooperatively with one another to avoid the conflict of interest.Â
The judiciary (the bench), the Bar (the Bar Association), and the prosecution are not adversaries. To achieve justice, they should work together in a friendly manner. It is the duty of a person (judge or advocate or a normal client) whether in offline or in an online mode conducted through virtual hearings, to abide by the etiquette and standard professionalism to maintain the decorum of the court.
Conclusion
The pandemic caused radical changes and disturbances in the society. This also caused a negative effect on the legal profession. Amidst these difficulties, lawyers must still adhere to their professional responsibilities and ethical principles. During the outbreak of COVID-19, numerous State Bar Associations have even released guidance to assist lawyers with their ethical responsibilities.Â
The same way in which every person has standards of conduct, so does every advocate has ethical guidelines or duties that must be carried out towards himself or herself, his or her clients, opponents, colleagues, and the court, among other things. For example, it is the advocate’s responsibility to sustain the civility of the court and to act appropriately with his or her opponents or colleagues.Â
He must always work for the benefit of his clients and must abstain from engaging in any action that would betray their confidence in him. All of these responsibilities, ethics, and moral standards assist an advocate in achieving greatest success in his or her career and becoming a successful lawyer.
In the time of pandemic, many people are in a situation of distress and it is a duty of an advocate to not take advantage of their distress and help them in their interests, keeping in mind the ethical standards.Â
References
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:
https://t.me/joinchat/J_0YrBa4IBSHdpuTfQO_sA
Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.Â
