Image source - https://bit.ly/3CI9vLq

This article has been written by Vishal Kumar, an Advocate at the Patna High Court. 

Introduction 

Loksatta calls for re-imagination of governance in the country, with much greater flexibility for states and local bodies to self-govern themselves. The Union-state relationship has become one of the core issues ahead of the next general election. Part of the rhetoric is political hyperbole and electoral posturing, and it is sharpened by the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP’s) continuing expansion of its political footprint, and its take-no-prisoners approach to electoral battles. However, this climate gives us an opportunity to examine our federalism beyond partisan politics. We are approaching the third phase of federalism since the founding of our republic. 

First phase 

The traumatic events surrounding the partition of India and fears of Balkanization made our founding fathers opt for a highly centralised Union. States were given a well-defined legislative and executive jurisdiction in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. Institutions like the Finance Commission, Election Commission, and Supreme Court were created to ensure some degree of fairness in dealing with the states. However, an appointed governor as head of state with discretionary powers, Article 356, the All India Services, Planning Commission, the introduction of licence-permit-quota- raj- eroded the states’ powers significantly. Habitual abuse of Union’s powers for partisan political gain, frequent dismissal of elected state governments, Union’s near-complete control of public and private investments, excessive discretion of the Union in resource transfers, the internal emergency that made India a de-facto unitary state, and mass dismissals of state governments in 1977 and 1980 led to serious friction.

Second phase

In the second phase, powerful leaders like N.T. Rama Rao, Ramakrishna Hedge, Jyoti Basu, Biju Patnaik, and M. Karunanidhi emerged to rally people around federalism and states’ rights. A series of developments- the S.R. Bommai case verdict (1994) making abuse of Article 356 largely a thing of the past, successive Finance Commission reports on resource transfer, end of licence raj, a decline of discretionary public sector investments, the rise of regional parties, and the abolition of Planning Commission- helped create a more balanced federal India.

For example, according to revised estimates of 2017-18, half of the Union expenditure of around Rs. 22 trillion has been transferred to states. Of the total resource transfers, 69.4% is by Finance Commission devolution and grants, and the bulk of the rest is under centrally sponsored schemes. Indian federalism has matured quite a bit, and the states have far greater control of their economic and political management than in the earlier phase.

Third phase and future 

However, serious structural problems remain. States and local governments have responsibility for most of the things people need and expect from the government on a daily basis- water supply, electricity, sanitation, drainage, police, courts, roads, traffic, schools, colleges, healthcare, and myriad public services. Our politics is centred around the states, and national verdicts are generally a mere aggregate of states’ verdicts. In all elections from panchayat to Parliament, people essentially vote for or against leaders and parties at state level, and punish them for failure to deliver.

The national government is largely notional for most people most of the time. States exercise real power, and yet are severely constrained in delivering outcomes. In the first five decades after independence, federalism was eroded by the Union’s arbitrary and partisan exercise of power. Now, the Union government has much less discretion compared to the earlier period; and yet, states are severely constrained in fulfilling their obligations to people.

These fetters are no longer partisan politics; they are structural and constitutional. A rigid, uniform political model imposed on all states and local governments disregarding local needs, a dysfunctional bureaucracy protected by Article 311, the generalist, all-purpose All India services that do not bring specialized skills required to manage various services and enjoy a monopoly of all key public offices, the well-intentioned, but poorly drafted Part IX of the Constitution that created over-structured, under-powered local governments that failed to take root as the third tier of federalism, needless rigidity in Union legislation on subjects like education with resultant failure to improve outcomes despite the vast expenditure, and the continuing archaic anachronistic role of nominated governors are making states and local governments dysfunctional.

The results of our governance failure are catastrophic. Despite our self-image, immense potential, and many obvious strengths, our outcomes as a nation are far from satisfactory. Out of the 49 relatively large nations with the gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $200 billion, India ranks at the near bottom on most indicators of basic amenities, infrastructure, education, and healthcare, in the company of Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Nigeria. Our people deserve more, and we as a nation have far greater potential unfulfilled. This calls for a more nuanced third phase of federalism while preserving and strengthening the nation’s unity and integrity, our constitutional freedoms, checks and balances, and democratic accountability.

In no other democracy does the federal constitution impose a uniform structure, electoral system, and bureaucratic apparatus on states and local governments. Even small unitary states like Britain, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, and London city have their own electoral systems different from the Westminster model. In the US, each of the 50 states has its own constitutions and structure of government. In Australia too, each of the six states and two self-governing territories has its own constitutions. In Germany, every Land (State) has its own constitution with the power and flexibility to design its own governance structure. In Canada, the 10 provinces have the right to decide on the electoral system, the form of government, and the local governance structure.

Conclusion

The time has come for India to move to the third phase of federalism. Many of our states are larger than 90% of nations on earth. We need to allow each state to have its own model of governance, bureaucracy, and local governments, but with firm, safeguards to preserve national unity, separation of powers, fundamental rights, and democratic accountability. The one-size-fits-all model cannot deliver the desired outcomes of prosperity, elimination of poverty, and national greatness in a vast and diverse nation of 1.3 billion people. We need more flexible federalism, strengthening India’s unity and integrity, and allowing us to fulfill our potential.


Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:https://t.me/joinchat/J_0YrBa4IBSHdpuTfQO_sA

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here