This article is written by Madhuri Pilania, from Symbiosis Law School, Noida. 

Abstract

This research paper enlightens about a type of partnership i.e. Public Private Partnership. This kind of partnership is booming throughout the world. This paper highlights various modules of the PPP. It talks about how a PPP works and also highlights the risks and advantages related to a PPP. It also talks about the economic impact and growth of PPP  in India. Why are Public Private Partnerships so important for a developing country like India?  It talks about How can someone start a PPP and what is the process? How can a PPP help in reduction of Poverty and generate income in India? This paper examines the legal principles of creating an effective PPP model and infrastructure. 

Introduction 

A public-private partnership is also called a PPP, it is a long term agreement between a national or local government and a private company. A public-private partnership exists when one or more public organisations agrees to work with one or more private organizations. PPPs existed for a long time but its significance became more popular in the 1980’s across the globe. As governments attempted to obtain benefits from the private organizations without totally indulging in the private sector. In this type of arrangement, private organizations carry out aspects of government companies. A well established PPP model with economic and social infrastructure is used in more than half of the world’s countries. 

How public-private partnership works

A PPP usually has contract time periods of twenty five to thirty years or it can be more. The financing of PPP is partly done by the private sector and partly from the public sector. The private partner plays part in designing, completing, implementing, and funding the project, while the public partner focuses on defining and monitoring conforms with the objectives. Risks are distributed between the public and private partners according to the ability of each to assess, control, and cope with them. PPP’s take a range of different types surrounding ownership organizations, various roles and allotment of risk between the public and private partners. For Example, a government in a place might be indebted and is unable to build a capital intensive project but a private company might be interested in financing the project so that they can gain operating profits from the construction.

A (PPP) is a partnership between the public sector and the private sector for the purpose of accomplishing a project or a service traditionally provided by the public sector.

Advantages and disadvantages

Public private partnerships between the private and government companies are advantageous to both the parties. For Example, innovation and technology of the private sector provides better services to the public sector as the operational efficiency is improved. On the other hand, public companies provide incentives to the private sector. Also, economic transformation makes the country more competitive in accelerating the infrastructure and construction. 

The advantage of a PPP is that the management skills and financial awareness of private business can create better value for money for taxpayers when proper arrangements between the public and private sectors are used.

A public-private partnership can increase the quality, the efficiency and the competitiveness of public services. It complements the public sector and raises additional finance in an environment where there are restrictions on budget. The best use of private sector operational efficiencies can increase quality to the public and the ability to speed up infrastructure development.

There are some disadvantages too. There are risks associated with the construction and infrastructure like roads and railways. If the work is not completed on time, the private company has to bear the losses for any technical defects or if the costs exceed the estimation. The private company may have to face risks if it cannot deliver the services as promised. The risk is more when the users are less in number than expected for the infrastructure or service, like bridges, roads or tunnels. If the public company or partner pays only a minimum fee then the private partner will have to bear the risk. 

Some people who analyse the PPP in detail say that it is harmful for the PPP if resources are diverted from the market to politics. 

Public-Private Partnership examples

Public-private partnerships are normally found in transport infrastructure such as highways, airports, railroads and bridges. Examples of municipal and environmental framework include water and wastewater facilities. Public service habitations include school buildings, prisons, student rooms, and entertainment and sports amenities. Eiffel Tower is the most well-known modern day example of Public Private Partnership. PPP traces its evidence to ancient Roman Civilisation in managing, building and maintaining ports. 

Impact of Public-Private Partnership on economic growth

The period of mid 1990s to 2004 marked the inception of PPPs in India. The transport and power sectors were mainly focused upon. However, the country did not accomplish much success as there was absence of a mature framework for PPP. Eventually, the government laid down foundations for the framework during 2004-2012. The government formed guidelines and did standardization of documents for the projects. 

PPPs do have a great impact on overall economic growth. A PPP increases the net investment in a  certain industry and leads to a larger project growth in the specified sector. Basically, PPPs allow large scale government projects such as hospitals, bridges etc which are completed with the help of private financing. The growth is seen when the technology and innovation of the private sector combines with the incentives of the public sector. 

The advantages of PPPs have been very much perceived among experts. There are numerous contentions for obtaining framework extends however just a couple are legitimate contentions. Under the correct conditions, PPPs can assemble extra financing hotspots for framework and vary installments into what’s to come. Except if there are proficiency gains, PPPs don’t expand the financial space accessible for foundation, it just influences the intertemporal government spending plan however there are no gains in rebate terms. Critically, the private part doesn’t support open framework ventures, it just funds them. 

The scholarly writing of PPPs have been well recognized among practitioners. There are many arguments in favor of obtaining framework projects but only a few are valid arguments. Under the right circumstances, PPPs can deploy additional financing sources for infrastructure and differ in the future. Unless there are efficiency gains, PPPs do not increase the fiscal space available for infrastructure, it only affects the government budget but there are no gains in discount terms. Majorly, the private sector does not fund public infrastructure projects, it only finances them.

The academic empirical literature of the economic impact of PPPs is very limited. Most of the evidence is based on unreliable evidence and case studies with the majority of them comparing outcomes before and after without any false evidence. Unfortunately, the overall economic impact of PPPs has not been systematically analyzed using sound analysis. The attribution problem remains one of the main constraints. The central question is to what extent changes in the outcomes of interest can be attributed to a particular intervention, and this would imply being able to compare the results of the PPP to a false public provision. Sound empirical analysis has been carried out in the literature of private sector participation (PPI) in Infrastructure mainly privatizations (Galal et al. 1994; Newbery and Pollitt, 1997; Jones, Jammal & Gokgur, 1998: Pollitt and Domah, 2000) where the authors built counterfactuals to assign ownership changes on those performance shifts post-privatization that are clearly caused by the ownership change per se. (cf. Birdsall and Nellis). In those examinations where PPPs are incorporated, they are just a single choice and they don’t recognize the various types of private investment; however, they rather catch the way that the private party can settle on choices that influence the exhibition of the utility. This infers that the majority of the discoveries can’t be summed up to different settings.

PPP in infrastructure

Public-private partnerships are used by the governments and public sectors in many countries to increase access to the services of infrastructure for their economies at reduced price. The private companies are responsible to carry out operations of the projects and they also take risks related to the projects. The PPPs authorises the public sector to benefit from it by technical expertise, efficiency and expertise. Almost 40 percent of the population of India does not have access to electricity and all weather roads. PPPs help to overcome the shortage of infrastructure facilities in these areas.

PPPs internationally

PPPs are famous not only in India but also in other countries. Some of the leading countries are the United Kingdom, Australia and South Africa. Also, countries including South Korea, Canada, Ireland, Portugal and others have active programmes of PPP. 

A Treasury equivalent to the Ministry of Department of Finance has been assigned a leading role to review and approve PPP by South Africa, Australia and the United Kingdom. The role of reviewing and approving PPP proposals is segregated from the project development where there is involvement of government in these countries. These three countries place prominence on the proposed PPP projects and show that they are valuable to the public sector. 

Australia 

Australia entrenched its National Public Private Partnership Policy in the year 2008. It was built in the Australian state of Victoria. In Australia, the leader is the State of Victoria. The progress of PPP is governed by National Public Private Partnership Policy and the guidelines are laid down by the federal Government. So how does it work? The projects proposed are supposed to submit a business case to the Treasury and identify the need for the project. What will be the costs and benefits of the project? The Treasury needs to approve the business case before the Cabinet approves it. 

United Kingdom

Private Finance Initiative (PFI) was introduced by the United Kingdom in the year 1992 to organize private financing into social and economic infrastructure projects. The PPP programmes have grown to become one of the largest in the UK. Transport sector has the largest share of the capital value. The UK Treasury has created a PPP policy team within the infrastructure advisory arm. Standardised contracts for PFIs have been issued by the Treasury. Once the Treasury approves the project for PPP as part of the spending review of the department, then formal requirement is not needed for Treasury approvals. 

South Africa 

The programme of PPP in South Africa was started in 1997 with a wave of improvements and reforms in the public sector. This sector supports the environment which is designed to enable PPPs. Here the early PPP programmes included projects in the sectors of roads and water. A PPP cell was initiated in the National Treasury in the year 2000. The ongoing and proposed projects are monitored by the PPP units and they provide guidance. Local Governments and line departments are required to depend on external advisors to help them through the development and transaction of the project. 

Why are PPPs important for the economy

• The projects are suitable to be carried out by the private and public sectors together. There are certain features which make a project competent to become a PPP whereas some projects are not suitable to become PPP or we can say it will be inappropriate for the project. 
• The environment of Public sectors are suitable to support the PPP projects. As PPP is a complex organization so it requires support from the public companies during its operation and development. The success of the PPP can be escalated with the help of public sectors. 
• India has a huge infrastructure need and it is associated with financing. So, PPP assists to meet the need and financing gap. Usually, the private sectors arranges and provides the funding. This releases the public companies from the need to meet the financial demand from its own revenues or taxes. 
• When the private sector finances the project, it enables the public companies to shift large expenditure programmes from the balance sheet. It is a motivating factor for the PPPs in many countries. Since the constraint on finance is government obligation to a borrowing cap. 

Impact of PPPs on poverty and income distribution 

As far as access to administrations, at a standard of activity of utilities by the public area, the most unfortunate sections of the population were generally to a great extent barred from the service of open administrations. They would depend rather on administrations of small and medium private suppliers, regularly at greater expense. Estache (2004) shows that ”for a huge example of African nations, the last two deciles of the populace are basically not associated and depend on elective wellsprings of vitality and water. When all is said in done the benchmark of open help the executives is surely generally backward with white collar class that pushed for changes in utilities the board, however for quality purposes. McKenzie and Mookherjee (2003) find that the distributional effect of private area interest (basically power, media communications, water, and gas), on account of Bolivia, Nicaragua Argentina and Mexico was by and large positive in light of administration expansion to already detached clients, quality upgrades that brought about government assistance gains for the least fortunate family units, and positive monetary effect for the state. The negative effect relates for the most part to work constriction. The investigation utilizes a when strategy without a counterfactual.

Process needed to start a PPP

• Lead an Initial Review of Project Feasibility– Open substances should finish a possibility study to decide whether the project(s) have present moment and long haul money related practicality. This underlying survey must be a reasonable assessment that sees requests, venture dangers, expected incomes and incomes, and the capacity to accomplish the undertaking objectives. All financial improvement and redevelopment ventures are dependent upon generally advertised changes and include hazard that the undertaking won’t convey anticipated results. 
• Assess the Project for Consistency with Community Priorities and Long-Term Strategic Plans- All P3 Agreements ought to be reliable with the general key, ground breaking strategies, and money related arrangements of the association. Also, the association ought to assess the destinations for the extent and decide whether support in the venture is steady with the crucial administration. 
• Recognize any Unmet Competencies on the Government Staff– Complex activities will require specific assets, yet with numerous other P3 understandings, inner staff will have the option to lead the examination. For all P3 Agreements, the association should accumulate a group that contains investigators, lawful guidance, assets with industry related aptitude, possibly a monetary consultant/city counselor with financial improvement skill, as well as bond counsel. Open substances ought to decide at an opportune time in their investigation whether outside assets are expected to supplement staff assets in executing the prescribed procedures of this best practice. 
• Decide the Fiscal and Economic Impact of the Project– The open element ought to decide the reasonable financial and monetary effects of the proposed venture considering any task dangers or vulnerability in the computation. Variables to consider while recognizing potential expenses and advantages include: 

1. Starting Costs of Incentives. 
2. Long haul Costs of Incentives. 
3. Anticipated that Return should both the Community and to the Private Entity. 
4. Activities Costs (pay, benefits, gear, supplies, backhanded expenses. 
5. Citizens Risk – Assigning express expenses to hazard and hazard like results. 
6. Foundation Impacts, including the long haul expenses of looking after the framework. 
7. Opportunity Costs – Do the open advantages of a task mirror the best utilization of the open venture (best utilization of subsidizing, exertion, and land.

Conclusion 

This article assesses the ongoing academic writing on the effect of PPPs on gains in administration arrangement, income distribution and poverty. There is plenty of proof and contextual investigations where attribution remains questionable.

Tragically, the observational proof on the effect of PPPs is generally restricted to investigations of private area interest in framework ventures, where PPPs is one of numerous choices that by and large cannot be undone. The extent of the effect shifts by segment and size of the venture and with the specific circumstance, particularly as it identifies with the institutional and administrative condition. Has this positive effect converted into lower costs, more occupations and less destitution? Here the accessibility of information turns out to be incredibly poor and the proof slim. Effectiveness gains don’t continuously convert into decrease in taxes because of beginning costs underneath cost recuperation (with sponsorships not in every case all around focused to poor people), or with the private segment holding some portion of the benefit. Numerous researchers contend that gains in labor profitability have been connected to a decrease in staff. A large portion of the writing affirms this has been the situation for transient direct work; be that as it may, little is thought about the medium-and long haul sway on immediate and circuitous work that could have counteracted the beginning negative effect. The experimental proof additionally demonstrates that the distributional effect shifted, yet the impacts were to a great extent positive.

---

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join: