This article is written by Harsh Raj. This article deals with the anti-suit injunction, examining judicial pronouncements on the subject in both India and different countries. The article further deals with the scenario in which an anti-suit injunction can be granted, when it can be refused to be granted, and the difference between an anti-suit injunction and anti-anti-suit injunction, among other things.
The interdependence of countries after globalisation has increased. Its level could have been seen during the COVID-19 pandemic. It has also led to the rapid growth of trade and business among the countries. The increasing level of inter-country trade led to a high number of transactions, along with international disputes. As a result of the rising international disputes, the need for their redress within a limited time frame arose. The redressal body has to keep in mind the laws of the different parties or nations while addressing the disputes.
While dealing with international commercial disputes, arbitration played a pivotal role, along with litigation. Consequently, it is a regular practice in the international disputes to disrupt the proceedings by bringing the disputes before the national courts to seek an “anti-suit injunction.” In this article, the author has discussed anti-suit injunction in detail.
What is an anti-suit injunction
The origin of the anti-suit injunction can be traced to England, where it evolved from a mechanism intended to restrain proceedings in another domestic court. The anti-suit injunction is the result of the jurisdictional contretemps among the admiralty courts, common law courts, and ecclesiastical courts. The common law courts of litigation before the ecclesiastical and common law courts.
An anti-suit injunction is an order issued by a court to bar a party from proceeding with any step in another jurisdiction. It is used to prevent the party from commencing any action in another forum or to force that party to discontinue such action if it has already commenced. The order of the anti-suit injunction is primarily used in common-law countries. According to the pronouncement of the case of Modi Entertainment Network v. WSG Cricket Pt. Ltd.(2003), it is a situation when a court restrains a party to a suit before it from prosecuting a case in another court that includes a foreign court as well. In other words, anti-suit injunctions prohibit a party from continuing a case in another jurisdiction.
When an anti-injunction is granted
It became important for the courts to order anti-suit injunctions to prevent any irreparable miscarriage of justice. In various pronouncements, the court has held different situations under which an anti-suit injunction is granted. In the case of Modi Entertainment Network v. WSG Cricket Pt. Ltd.(2003), the Supreme Court has established the grounds on which an anti-suit injunction can be granted. The court has held that while granting the anti-suit injunction, the following aspects need to be satisfied:
If the injunction is declined, the justice will be denied. That means, where granting anti-suit injunction become mandatory to meet ends of justice, in such a situation anti-suit injunction is granted by the court.
The principle of comity must be kept in mind. In simpler words, it means respecting the jurisdiction of the court where the proceeding is going on.
The interpretation of the contract and the circumstances of the facts must be kept in mind while granting the injunction.
The court shall examine the convenience of the party and can grant an anti-suit injunction against oppressive or vexatious proceedings that is not convenient for the parties, in situations where more than one forum is available. The court will consider which forum is appropriate while exercising its discretion to grant an anti-suit injunction.
The exclusive and non-exclusive jurisdiction is a very relevant factor that is related to the jurisdictional clause of the contract. Where parties have agreed to approach a neutral foreign forum for the resolution of their disputes arising under the contract under a non-exclusive jurisdiction clause, in such case no anti-suit injunction is granted, as parties consider convenience and other factors before submitting to the chosen court.
The anti-suit injunction shall not be granted, where concerned parties, under a non-exclusive jurisdiction clause, consent to approach a neutral foreign forum and be governed under its laws to resolve their disputes related to the contract.
Further, it was held by the Supreme Court, in the case of Dinesh Singh Thakur v. Sonal Thakur, (2018), that the court could not grant the suit of anti-suit injunction a continuing proceedings are not unfair. The anti suit injunction could be granted if the continuing proceedings are unfair and serve injustice to any party by the Supreme Court.
Important consideration while granting anti suit injunction
Anti suit injunctions are generally granted to prevent breach of contract. Before granting anti suit injunctions, the following consideration must be established-
Jurisdiction of the court in relation to the party against whom this injunction is granted;
Validity of the agreement pursuant to which this anti suit injection is applied for; and
Due consideration would be given to intention of parties in formulation of the agreement.
It should be noted that if the case, for which anti suit injunction application is filed, has reached to a stage from where it will not be appropriate for the court to grant the injunction, in such case the application for anti suit injunction would get dismissed.
When is an anti-suit injunction refused
The court needs to grant an anti-suit injunction so that justice is preserved. In the same manner, it is also important for the court to investigate the circumstances of every case before granting an anti-suit injunction. It has to be ascertained by the court that by granting anti suit injunction, it is not causing any injustice. If the court is not satisfied, it also has the power to refuse the granting of an anti-suit injunction. The Supreme Court of India, in the case of Modi Entertainment Network and Anr v. WSG Cricket Pte Ltd., has propounded that the anti-suit injunction will not be granted against the defendant where the parties have agreed for the exclusive jurisdiction of a court that includes a foreign court, i.e., a forum of choice regarding the continuance of proceedings. Additionally, the Supreme Court in the case of Dinesh Singh Thakur v. Sonal Thakur has also opined that the anti-suit injunction should be granted sparingly, and the courts should be extra-cautious before passing such orders.
What is an anti-anti-suit injunction
The Anti-anti-suit injunction is an order where the party was barred to proceed with the application of anti-suit injunction that is filed before any foreign court to injunct the “local proceeding by the court. The anti-suit injunction was examined in India for the first time by the High Court of Calcutta in the case of Devi Resources Ltd. v. Ambo Exports Ltd., where the court stated that the general equitable jurisdiction of granting an injunction includes the authority to grant anti-suit, anti-arbitration, or anti-anti-suit injunctions. But such an injunction can be issued in the most extreme situation, where the refusal will endorse the gross injustice.
Further, it was the case of Interdigital Technology Corp. v. Xiaomi Corp. (2021), where the anti-suit injunction was passed for the first time. The High Court of Delhi held that the grounds for granting an anti-suit injunction would be the same as those for an anti-suit injunction. In addition to that, the court has acknowledged its jurisdiction over the defendants and proceeded forward in granting a global injunction in favor of the plaintiff.
Difference between anti-injunction and anti-anti-injunction
The Delhi high court in its judgement of the Interdigital Technology Corp. v. Xiaomi Corp. has explained the meaning of the anti-suit injunction and anti-anti-suit injunction as follows-
Anti-suit injunction: It is an order where the court stops the party from proceeding with the main suit that is pending before the foreign courts.
Anti-anti-suit injunction: It is an order where the courts stop the party from proceeding with the application of anti-suit injunction that is filed before the foreign court to injunct the “local proceedings”.
Views of Indian judiciary on anti-suit injunctions
Oil and Natural Gas commission v. Western Commission of North America (1987)
Facts of the Case
In this case, the Indian company ONGC entered into an agreement of drilling with the (US company) i.e, the Western companies of North America and signed the paper that states the arbitration of the dispute will be held in London, but as per the provisions of the domestic arbitration statute of India. The dispute arose, and the judgement was given in favour of the US company in October 1985. After that, a suit was filed in the US district court to get confirmation of the award and to obtain favour against the Indian company, ONGC. In retaliation, ONGC filed a petition before the Bombay High Court to overturn the award and matter, prohibiting the US company from proceeding with its suit in the US court.
The High Court of Bombay has held that the US company was entitled to bring suit in US court to enforce the award as a foreign award, and the Court has further opined that the injunction was not suitable as the pending petition or application in the high court and did not affect the right of award. ONGC challenged the judgement in the Supreme Court of India.
Issues
The issue in this case was “whether the High Court of Bombay’s judgement and reasoning in granting the restraint order” was justified.
Judgement
The Apex Court has overturned the judgement of the Bombay High Court. The court has opined that the award did not bind parties unless confirmed by the Indian High Courts according to the domestic arbitration law of India. So, the award was not enforceable in the US as it didn’t bind the parties. Further, as per Article V (1)(e) of the New York convention, which allows the national courts to refuse the recognition of an award if the party opposing recognition establishes that the award has not yet become binding on the parties or has been suspended, the injunction was appropriate. It is also the first pronouncement on the anti-suit injunction, and is a very important judgement from the point of view of identification of situations in which the continuance of the proceeding in the foreign court can be oppressive. Further, the Supreme Court has held that the anti-suit injunction would be granted if:
It was important to do so.
There is an end to justice.
The action of a foreign court is oppressive.
The High Court has undoubted jurisdiction to grant an injunction.
British India Navigation Co. Ltd. v. Shanmughavilas Cashew Industries (1990)
Facts of the case
In this case, Shanmaughavilas Cashew Industries (the respondent) purchased 350 tons of raw cashew nuts from East Africa. These goods were transported via the vessel named “SS Steliosm,” chartered by the British India Steam Navigation Co., Ltd., (the appellant), an incorporated entity based in England. The contract of affreightment (a contract hiring a ship to carry goods) was entered and contained three bills of lading issued to the shipper for the three loads of raw nuts. But only 3712 bags out of 4445 bags were delivered to Cochin. The first respondent, i.e, cashew industries, sued the Navigation Co. before the court of the Subordinate Judge, Cochin, to seek damages for the delay in delivery.
Issues
Whether the court of the Subordinate Judge of Cochin has jurisdiction or only the English Court has jurisdiction?
Who will be liable, “the chartered” or “the owner,” as per clause 3 of the agreement?
Judgement
The court of the Subordinate Judge, Cochin, held in favour of the respondent, and after that, the High Court of Kerala also held the judgement in favour of the respondent. Then, the same was appealed in the Supreme Court. The appeal was successful in the Supreme Court, and the apex court has set aside the impugned judgement and remanded the case to the Subordinate court. Further, in this case, the Supreme Court has determined the rule of the jurisdiction of the court. The court has determined that in the absence of a clear designation of the proper law for the country, the law of the chosen court will be considered the applicable law. This applies when the claims made align with the terms and conditions related to the subject matter.
Modi Entertainment Network v. WSG Cricket Pte.(2003)
Facts of the case
In this case, the respondent, WSG Cricket, had the sole right to telecast and sell the events of the ICC tournament in Kenya. The other party entered into an agreement by which the sole licence was granted to the other party, i.e., Modi Entertainment Network, to telecast the event on Doordarshan. After the launch of the telecast, the respondent, WSG Cricket, alleged a breach of the agreement by the appellant and threatened to continue the telecast given to Doordarshan. After the round of allegations, the appellant (Modi Entertainment Network) filed a suit in the Bombay High Court, and they alleged that they suffered a huge loss of revenue as advertisers had pulled out due to the open threats.
On the other hand, the respondent (WSG Cricket) also filed a suit in English Court. Although the Jurisdiction Clause of the agreement provides that disputes will be resolved as per English law, they have submitted non-exclusive jurisdiction to the English courts.
Issues
Whether the bench of the High Court mistakenly vacated the anti-suit injunction granted by a single judge?
Judgement
The Bombay High Court granted the anti-suit injunction suit to the appellant. Therefore, an appeal was made, which was preferred by the apex court. It is the first case where, for the first time, the Supreme Court has discussed and outlined the principles and grounds on which an anti-suit injunction can be granted. The court has further held that Indian courts are of equity and exercise jurisdiction in personam, which means they can issue an anti-suit injunction to a party over whom they have personal jurisdiction. However, the jurisdiction of the personam will be used occasionally because it results in interference in other courts’ jurisdiction. In addition to that, the court has laid down some principles on which the anti-suit injunction order would be given.
In another case, the Supreme Court held that if the continuation of the proceedings resulted in injustice, there would be a defeat of justice, and injustice would be perpetuated. While delivering the judgement in this instance, the court upheld the decision in Modi Entertainment Network v. WSG Cricket Pte. Ltd., and the principle articulated in that case later evolved into established legal precedent.
Dinesh Singh Thakur v. Sonal Thakur (2018)
Facts of Case
In this case, Dinesh Singh Thakur and Sonal Thakur, who married in 1995, had two children. The appellant-husband worked in the USA and brought the respondent-wife on a dependent visa. In 2003, they were granted US citizenship and later “PIO” and “OCI” status. Thereafter, a martial discord arises between Dinesh S. Thakur and Sonal Thakur. Subsequently, the appellant-husband filed a plea for separation under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, against the respondent-wife, who then filed a petition for divorce in the Circuit Court of Pinellas County, Florida. The appellant-husband filed a civil suit before the District Judge, Family Court, Gurgaon, under the Hindu Marriage Act, seeking a permanent injunction and to prevent the respondent-wife from pursuing the divorce petition before the Court in the United States. The District Judge granted an interim injunction, which was later vacated. The respondent-wife filed a vacation and modification application, and the appellant-husband filed a High Court petition, which was rejected by the High Court.
Issues
Whether the Appellant-husband was entitled to the decree of anti-suit injunction against the Respondent-wife?
Judgement
The Supreme Court while examining the facts and circumstances of the case stated that anti-suit Injunctions are intended to prevent a party to a proceeding from filing or litigating a lawsuit in another court, especially a foreign court. In simpler words, an anti-suit injunction is a judicial order that prevents one party from bringing a case to another court that is not within its jurisdiction. In this case, the court did not grant the anti-suit injunction as the continuing proceedings are not unfair. The suit of the injunction could be granted if the continuing proceedings are unfair and serve an injustice to any party.
Interdigital Technology Corp. v. Xiaomi Corp. (2021)
Facts of Case
In this case, there was a dispute between Interdigital (the plaintiff) and Xiaomi (the defendant) regarding the violation of an Indian patent. Therefore, the plaintiff has filed a suit for a permanent injunction as the defendant has not given consent to use the patent. Earlier, the defendant filed the Standard Essential Patents before the Wuhan Court, which was dismissed on September 23, 2020. In addition to the present suit, the plaintiff has also filed interlocutory applications for interim relief and set up a confidentiality club. The Delhi High Court issued summons in the current suit and interlocutory applications. The defendant filed an anti-suit injunction to restrain the plaintiff before proceeding with the suit.
Issues
Whether the court has the jurisdiction to grant the sought relief?
If yes, whether the Court should grant the sought Relief?
Judgement
The court has passed an ad-interim injunction in terms of the prayer made by the plaintiff in the present case. The infringement action is the only plausible way for a SEP holder. There would be no deterrent factor left if the proceeding against the defendant was ended to violate the plaintiff’s patent. The Delhi High Court has further explained the different types of injunctions in disputes regarding the appropriate forum. Various types of injunctions include the following:
Anti-suit injunction: where the party is restricted by the courts from proceeding with the main suit that is pending before the foreign courts.
Anti-anti-suit injunction: It is an injunction where a party is restricted from proceeding with the anti-suit injunction, filed before a foreign court, whose aim is to stop the “local proceedings.”.
Anti-enforcement injunction: where one party is barred by the court from enforcing any order passed by a foreign court on the other party.
Views of foreign judiciary
The suit of injunction is primarily used in Common law countries. Its origin can be traced back to England, so it became vital to discuss the viewpoint of the UK judiciary, first.
In the case of Airbus Industries GIE v. Patel, (1998),, the English court has discussed the need to grant an anti-suit injunction. The House of Lords has laid down two principles on which an anti-suit injunction would be granted. The First is to address the need for equity of justice, and the second is to respect the principle of comity in International law. Further, the House of Lords in the case of Carron Iron Co. Proprietors v. Maclaren, (1855), held that the issued injunction should be on the principle of “equity and good conscience”. Later, the courts of the UK in the case of Castanho v. Brown and Root (UK) Ltd., (1980), held that to avoid the perseverance of Injustice, the anti-suit injunction should be provided. And in continuity, the court of privy council in the case of Societe Nationale Industrielle Aerospatiale v. Lee Kui Jak, (1987), has added that if the foreign proceedings are oppressive, the court would grant the injunction.
The judgement of the caseCSR Ltd. v. Cigna Insurance Australia Ltd., (1997), laid the principles in Australia to grant the order of anti-suit injunction. The most common principles are the preserv00ation of justice and overcoming oppressive proceedings.
As far as Canada is concerned, in the case of Workers Compensation Board v. Amchem Products Inc., (1993), the court has opined the two states upon which the anti suit injunction can be issued. The first is to apply the principles of comity, and the second is to analyse the contractual terms of the parties.
Conclusion
The discovery of anti-injunction is aimed at preserving justice worldwide. The proceeding and the judgement of a particular court of the country may be biased to their local party and oppressive to the other party. In various judgements of the different courts, it has been held that an anti-suit injunction will be granted if the continuance proceeding is oppressive and heading towards the preservation of injustice. In some of the judgments it has also been held that while granting the orders of the anti-suit injunction, the principle of comity must be kept in mind as it came under the jurisdiction of another court. Primarily, anti-suit injunction is prevalent in Common law countries. India is also a Common law country. The Indian courts are the courts of equity that gave the power to issue anti-suit injunctions to preserve justice and prevent injustice.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the name of the first case where the principles of anti-injunction were discussed and defined in India?
The first landmark judgement, where the principles for the anti-suit injunction were first discussed and defined in India, was the Modi Entertainment Network v. WSG Cricket Pt. Ltd. In this case, the Supreme Court has stated the Indian courts make themselves “courts of equity that exercise jurisdiction in personam as because it has the power to issue an anti-suit injunction.
The anti-suit injunction can not be granted under some ground or the situation. These situations are mentioned under which Section of the specific Relief Act 1963?
Section 41 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 provides grounds and situations under which the anti-suit injunction can not be granted.
What is the most common ground that is also endorsed by the judiciary of different countries to grant the anti-suit injunction?
The preservation of justice and the oppressive judicial proceedings are the most common grounds upon which the anti-suit injunction can be granted, also endorsed by the judiciary of the different countries.
What is the meaning of ex parte ad interim injunction?
An ex parte injunction is mainly a direction, command to restrain, granted after hearing only one party in matters of ‘urgency’, without a notice to the other parties involved.
Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:
This article has been written by Shivani. A. This article deals with Section 300 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. It provides a complete overview of the provision and also sheds light on the meaning, history and analysis of the principle of double jeopardy. The article also aims to cover the principles in other countries as well. It also consists of various important judicial pronouncements pertaining to the given principle.
It has been publishedby Rachit Garg.
Table of Contents
Introduction
“Punishment is not for revenge, but to lessen crime and reform the criminal”- Elizabeth Fry. In India, we believe that punishment is essential to reforming a criminal and providing justice to the victim. There is a principle in criminal jurisprudence that prevents a person from getting punished twice for the same offence. This is because the main objective of punishing an offender gets fulfilled after the completion of the term of the punishment at the first instance, and punishing the person for the second time is considered to be against the right to life and liberty given under Article 21. This principle of not punishing the offender more than once is known as the “principle of double jeopardy.” This principle is present under Article 20(2) of the Constitution of India and Section 300 of the Criminal Procedure Code (the Cr.P.C.). However, the principle of double jeopardy is exclusively used in criminal courts, and does not prohibit defendants from being charged in a civil court for the same offence. The origin, essentials, various provisions pertaining to double jeopardy, circumstances under which this doctrine cannot be applied, international perspective with other nations, difference between the Section 300 of the Cr.P.C and Article 20(2) of the Constitution and case laws are all covered in detail in this article.
Concept of double jeopardy
Meaning of double jeopardy
This principle can be traced back to the maxim “nemo debet bis vexari pro una et eadem causa,” which means that a man shouldn’t be vexed twice for the same offence. This principle has been incorporated into the laws of many countries. It is a very important principle, as it helps to uphold justice by preventing the hardship caused by the re-litigation of offenders.
The meaning of double jeopardy can be ascertained by looking into the following provisions. According to Black Law’s dictionary, double jeopardy means, “the fact of being prosecuted or sentenced twice for substantially the same offence.”. This concept has also been provided under Article 20(2) of the Constitution of India and Section 300 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C). These provisions have expressly prohibited multiple convictions of a single offender regarding the same offence.
History of double jeopardy
The history of this principle dates back to the 12th century. During this period, there were two courts – royal and ecclesiastical. This led to a conflict between Henry II and Archbishop Thomas Becket, as the king wanted the clergy to be punished in the royal court even after the ecclesiastical court punished him. But Becket relied on St. Jerome’s interpretation of Nahum and claimed that the act of the king would be against the principle laid down in the maxim “nimo bis in idipsum” which means that no man can be punished twice for the same offence. As a result of this, the concession that was granted by the King laid the foundation for the principle of double jeopardy.
This principle can also be found in Article 360 of the Napoleonic Code, that is, “the code d’instruction criminelle”. It stated that “No person legally acquitted cannot be arrested for the same offence committed by him for the second time.” References to the principle of double jeopardy can also be found in the Spanish law of the thirteenth century. However, the first judicial pronouncement of this principle was observed in the UK in the case of Connelly v. Director of Public Prosecutions (1964), in which it was held that “to apply this doctrine of double jeopardy, the accused must be put in peril of conviction for the same offence for which he has already been punished.”
The concept of double jeopardy was also known to the Greeks as well as the Romans and can also be found in Justinian’s Digest. The principle that they followed was that the Governor should not allow any person to be charged for the same offence for which he has already undergone trial and has also been convicted. The criminal procedure that was then followed was different from the system that we are currently following. They followed a system in which the defendant could be arrested 30 days after his acquittal.
In the Magna Carta, the principle of double jeopardy is not discussed. Also, it is not possible to interpret the same. The English system has adopted this principle from the Canon Law. As early as 847 A.D., the Canon Law provided that no one, not even God, can be judged for the same offence again. This can be incorporated into Roman law through Justinian’s Code.
This principle existed in India even before the Constitution came into force. However, the same has now been given constitutional validity, and it is no longer a mere statutory obligation. The principle of double jeopardy can thus be found in Article 20(2), Part III of the Constitution, that is, fundamental rights. The fundamental rights in the Constitution of India have been adopted from various sources, like England’s Bill of Rights, the United States Bill of Rights, and the French Declaration of the Rights of Man. It is also present in Section 300 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Conditions for the applicability of the principle of double jeopardy
In three situations, double jeopardy has been stated as a valid defence:
The first essential element to claim the defence of double jeopardy is that the person should be accused of a criminal offence. This defence does not apply to civil wrongs, as in civil cases, the doctrine of res judicata is invoked.
A case must be filed before a competent court, and the proceedings of the case must have taken place.
The decision should be delivered by the court, and the person should either be convicted or acquitted for the offence.
The subsequent trial must be the same as the one for which he was previously convicted or acquitted.
Exceptions for the applicability of principle of double jeopardy
A few exceptions to the principle of double jeopardy exist. The courts have added to the literature of the same through a catena of judicial pronouncements:
This principle is not applicable in civil cases. Simultaneous civil proceedings can be instituted against the accused, and he cannot plead the defence of double jeopardy in civil proceedings.
Illustration: Suppose ‘A’ killed ‘B’ in a drunk-and-drive case. Now, ‘B’s family can sue ‘A’ in both civil and criminal courts. When a suit is filed in a civil court, ‘B’s family can only recover the financial damages suffered by ‘B’ due to the act of ‘A’. In such a suit, ‘A’ has to discharge his liability. He is not entitled to claim the defence of double jeopardy when he is prosecuted for the crime committed by him just because he underwent a trial in civil court. This is because, when he underwent a trial in a criminal court, he discharged his liability towards society in general (right in rem). This will prevent him from committing such offences in the future and also serve as a precedent to discourage like-minded people from committing the same act. However, ‘A’ also has to discharge his liability towards ‘B’s family because he killed ‘B’. ‘B’s family has a right in personam against ‘A’ and can hence claim compensation from him by filing a suit against ‘A’ in the civil court.
Jeopardy must begin: This means that the defence of double jeopardy can be claimed only when the defendant has undergone some kind of jeopardy. This means that he should have undergone a trial before claiming this defence. It is only after the trial that a person is considered to have undergone jeopardy. This defence can only be claimed after an order of acquittal or conviction and this can be obtained only after the trial.
Jeopardy must end: It is not enough for a person to just undergo a trial to claim this offence. The trial should also come to an end and the judges of the case should adjudicate the case in favour of the accused and acquit him from the charges. Only after the judgement of acquittal delivered by the judge, jeopardy is over.
In the case of, State of Mizoram vs. Dr. C. Sangnghina (2018) the Respondent was charged for corruption in 2013, however, the Special Court dismissed the case due to lack of sanction, even before the commencement of the trial. However, when the case was filed against him in 2018 after acquiring proper sanction, he claimed the defence of double jeopardy.
The Supreme Court held that there was no bar for filing the fresh or supplementary charge sheet against the accused after obtaining valid sanction. This is because, in the instant case, the accused has not been tried, convicted or acquitted and hence, the principles of “double jeopardy” cannot be invoked at all.
Autrefois acquit and autrefois convict
The words ‘Autrefois acquit’ and ‘Autrefois convict’ are derived from the French language and mean ‘previously acquitted’ and ‘previously convicted’, respectively. These pleas have their origin in common law and can be used as a defence to prevent the trial from proceeding further due to the special circumstances posed by these pleas. The plea ‘Autrefois acquit‘ means that a person cannot be put to trial again for the same offence in which he has been acquitted previously, and such a plea can be taken combined with the plea of not guilty. The plea ‘Autrefois convict’ means that a person cannot be tried again for the same offence for which he was convicted previously. These two pleas together constitute the doctrine of Autrefois Acquit and Autrefois Convict, and this doctrine is embedded in the principle of double jeopardy.
These principles can be inferred from Article 20(2) of the Constitution of India and Section 300 of the Cr.P.C. However, before the Constitution came into force, the same was present in Section 26 of the General Clauses Act, 1897.
Analysis of the doctrine of double jeopardy in light of Section 300 CrPC
As already mentioned above, the doctrine of autrefois acquit and autrefois convict is present in Section 300 of Cr.P.C. A detailed analysis of this section will help us in understanding the doctrine in a better way.
Section 300 of Cr. P.C. is based on the principle that a person cannot be put in danger for an offence for which he has already been previously convicted or acquitted. It puts forth the principle of double jeopardy. However, a clear reading of the section helps us to understand that this rule is not absolute and has certain exceptions to it. This section is also based on the common law maxim “nemo debet bis vexari,” which means that a person shall not be brought into danger for the same offence more than once. A detailed study of this section will help us analyse the conditions necessary for this doctrine to prevail.
Section 300(1) CrPC
Section 300(1) states that, when a person has been tried by a court of competent jurisdiction and has been convicted or acquitted for the same, he should not be put to trial again for the same offence or the same facts or any offence which he has committed under Section 221(1) or he is getting punished under Section 221(2).
Hence, the essential elements of this subsection are:
The person must have been tried by a competent court.
The person must have been convicted or acquitted.
However, the judgement of conviction or acquittal delivered by the competent court remains in force until it has been set aside by a Court on appeal or revision and then such a person can again be tried for the same offence.
The person should have been put to trial for the second time.
Section 221(1) provides that whenever there is doubt in the facts of the case as to the offence for which a person needs to be punished, he can be charged with all such offences or any of such offences, or he may be charged for committing any one of the said offences. Section 221(2) provides that if a person is charged with a particular offence, however, the evidence of the case points at another offence, then he should be punished for the offence that he appears to have committed, even though he is not charged with the same. This section, however, doesn’t prevent the conviction or acquittal of a person for a different offence, which is based on different facts but on the same evidence.
Illustrations:
(a) Let’s say that a person “A” is charged with a crime that could include theft, receiving stolen property, criminal breach of trust, or cheating. In such a case, he might be made guilty of committing all of the following, that is , for receiving stolen property, theft, criminal breach of trust, and cheating, or he could be made liable for committing any of these offences.
(b) Let’s say that in the aforementioned scenario, “A” is initially just charged with theft, but subsequently, it appears that he also committed the crimes of receiving stolen goods and criminal breach of trust. Despite not having been charged with the crime, he could be found guilty of receiving stolen goods or of criminal breach of trust, depending on the circumstances.
Section 300(2) CrPC
Section 300(2) contemplates a situation in which a person is charged under Section 220(1) of the Cr.P.C. Section 300(2) states that in such situations, the person so charged can be put on re-trial even after the order of conviction or acquittal in the previous case. But, this can be done only with the consent of the state government. Section 220(1) provides that if a single person commits more than one act and the acts so committed are so connected together that they form a single transaction, then he may be tried separately for all such offences.
In this provision, the term ‘same transaction’ has been subjected to interpretation of the courts in various cases. In the case of Mohan Baitha v. State of Bihar (2001), the complainant , who was the father of the deceased, filed the petition as his daughter was subject to cruelty and as a result, died within 3 years of marriage. The petition was filed in Patna High Court whereas the offence was committed in Uttar Pradesh. The Accused was held liable under Section 304B, 34 and 406 of the IPC.
The Supreme Court observed that “There cannot be a universal formula to determine whether two or more acts constitute the same transaction.” It is evident from the continuity of the activity and the same goal or design that one transaction may have involved the commission of multiple offences. The series of acts charged against the person constitute the same transaction because of the close proximity of time, unity of place, unity or community of purpose or design, and continuity of activity.
Also, in the case of Anju Chaudhary v. State of U.P. (2013), the house of the complainant was on fire and the perpetrator was unknown. Hence, filed multiple FIRs bearing the same facts and the only changes in these FIRs was the value of the things which were damaged due to the fire. Therefore, the court held that there cannot be multiple FIRs or multiple investigations in respect of the same occurrence even though it is giving rise to more than one cognizable offence. In the instant case, these FIRs cannot be considered to be separate FIRs and they constitute the ‘same transaction’. It also observed that in order to consider several offences to be part of the same transaction, the test which has to be applied is whether they are related to one another in point of purpose or of cause and effect, or as principal and subsidiary, to result in one continuous action.
When a person has been tried for an offence and there was a chance to add another offence and to put him to trial for the same in the formal trial, but this chance was not utilised, he should not be liable to be tried again for the other offence as it leads to abuse. Hence, the provision mentions that the consent of the state government is required for the same. Also, the state government shouldn’t exercise this power arbitrarily. Rather, it should be used to provide and uphold justice.
Section 300(3) CrPC
Section 300(3) envisages a situation in which a person is convicted of any offence which is followed by certain consequences. The act done by him, along with the consequences, constituted a completely different offence from the one for which he was initially convicted. In such circumstances, if the court, during the time of conviction of the person, was not aware of such consequences, the person may be tried for such an offence at a later stage.
However, it is pertinent to note that Section 300(3) uses the phrase “a person convicted” and does not include “acquitted,” unlike the other subsections. Therefore, it can be inferred that this rule does not apply where he has been acquitted. The rationale behind this rule is that the person will be tried for an aggravated form of the offence and thus, he can only be tried if he was found guilty of the earlier offence which was less heinous.
Illustration: ‘A’ is tried and convicted for causing grievous hurt to a person. However, it was later found out that the person to whom ‘A’ caused grievous hurt died. In such circumstances, ‘A’ may be tried once again separately for the offence of culpable homicide, and it doesn’t amount to double jeopardy. However, if, in the above-mentioned illustration, ‘A’ was acquitted of the charge of grievous hurt, he cannot be tried once again if the person dies later on for the offence of culpable homicide under this section.
Section 300(4) CrPC
Section 300(4) provides that a person can be tried again for the same offence and the same facts, irrespective of whether he was convicted or acquitted in the previous trial if the court that delivered the judgement of the previous trial did not have competent jurisdiction.
Illustration: ‘A’ was prosecuted by a Judicial Magistrate of first class for robbery. However, he was again prosecuted on the same facts. Since the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class has no jurisdiction to try the offence of robbery and it is triable only by the Court of Session, the second trial of the person will not be barred irrespective of whether the person is convicted or acquitted in the first trial. This is because the decision of the court, which had no competency to try a particular case as per Section 26 of Cr.P.C., is considered non-est with respect to Section 300(5).
Section 300(5) CrPC
Section 300(5) states that if a person gets acquitted by a court under Section 258 of Cr.P.C., he cannot be put to trial once again for the same offence without the consent of the court that produced such an order of acquittal or of any other court to which the former court is subordinate. This provision is important as it can provide a check against abuse of the power of fresh prosecution.
In the case of Suo Moto v. State of Kerala and Anr (2018), Ramachandran, former District Police Chief, filed a letter in the Kerala High Court which highlighted various aspects of drug abuse in Kerala. The letter also focussed on the increase in the number of crimes committed by youngsters under the influence of drugs. Hence, the court took suo moto cognizance of the case and observed that, “Section 258 can be invoked only in peculiar and unusual circumstances in cases, wherein no prima facie case is made out against the accused or when the accusation does not constitute an offence or for the reason that the prosecution is bound to fail on account of a technical defect. For the reason that the accused had absconded or that despite the initiation of coercive proceedings, his presence could not be secured is no reason to invoke Section 258 of the Cr.P.C.”
Also, a bare perusal of the provision helps us understand that the provisions of this section do not hold good in cases of discharge or acquittal made in the cases that have been instituted on a complaint. There is a difference between the terms ‘discharge’ and ‘acquittal’ under Cr.P.C. Acquittals prohibit retrials for the same offence with identical circumstances or for any other offence with identical circumstances but with a different charge. If more or better evidence becomes available against the accused, the court may nonetheless proceed with fresh proceedings even after a discharge. Hence, the provision under Section 300(5) makes it clear that if an order of discharge is made under Section 258, it cannot be regarded as an acquittal under Section 300(5).
Section 300(6) CrPC
Section 300(6) states that nothing that is provided in this Section shall affect the provisions of Section 26 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 or of Section 188 of the Cr.P.C. Section 26 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, provides that when an act of an accused can be considered an offence under two or more enactments, then the offender can only be prosecuted and punished under any one of the enactments and not under both of them. There is, however, a difference between Section 26 of the General Clauses Act and Section 300 of Cr.P.C. The former provision prevents the retrial of different offences, whereas the latter prevents the retrial of the same offence.
It was held in the case of State of M.P v. Bireshwar Rao (1957), that “a trial and conviction under Section 409 of the IPC cannot be prohibited in a case where the accused had been tried and acquitted of an offence under Section 52 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, which was constituted on identical facts.”
Comparative analysis of double jeopardy in other countries
Since the principle of double jeopardy is one of the most essential principles of criminal jurisprudence, it is widely used in countries across the world. Hence, the analysis of this principle in some of the countries is given below.
Double jeopardy in the United States of America
The concept of double jeopardy came into force in America through the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution which stated that “nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.”The interpretation of the provision of double jeopardy in America was very narrow, and it was only applicable to the actions of the Federal Government and its subdivisions. However, the scenario changed in 1969 in the case of Benton v. Maryland (1969). In this case, it was held that the doctrine equally applies to both the centre and the states. However, in America, they follow the doctrine of dual sovereignty. This implies that the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution prevents multiple prosecutions under the same sovereignty. Therefore, the principle of double jeopardy in the US doesn’t prevent multiple prosecutions for the same act by independent sovereigns. It means that a person can be punished for the act done by him separately by the federal court as well as the state court and it doesn’t amount to double jeopardy.
The Supreme Court of the US recognised the power of independent sovereigns to punish an individual for an act done by him that falls within the jurisdiction of both the sovereigns in the case of United States v. Lanza (1922). Then, in 1985, the Court further interpreted the dual sovereignty doctrine to incorporate separate punishments by both independent sovereigns in the case ofHeath v. Alabama (1985). In this case, the Accused murdered his wife in Georgia and was convicted by the jury in Georgia and subsequently, the jury in Alabama also declared him to be guilty. He contended that the conviction in Alabama was not valid as he was already convicted in Georgia and also that the jury in Alabama had no jurisdiction in the present case. However, the court rejected these contentions by applying the doctrine of dual sovereignty which grants each state the right to try a criminal under the laws of that state, regardless of whether he had already been tried under the laws of another state. Hence, though the Fifth Amendment initially was applicable only to the Federal Government, the Supreme Court has ruled that it applies to both the federal and the state government through the incorporation by the Fourteenth Amendment.
Double jeopardy in the United Kingdom
Earlier, in the United Kingdom, there were very strict laws to prevent double jeopardy. The doctrines of autrefois acquit and autrefois convict were a part of the common law system ever since the Norman conquest and were considered to be an essential feature to protect the liberty of people and to ensure the practice of due process of law. Hence, the Parliament of the UK passed the Criminal Justice Act, 2003. This was done to dilute the laws of double jeopardy in the UK.
Hence, the strict form of preventing double jeopardy is no longer followed in the UK. Retrials are now possible in case there is new and compelling evidence. However, all these cases are to be approved by the Director of Public Prosecutions. Also, the Court of Appeal must agree to quash the previous acquittal to proceed with the retrial of an individual. Surfacing new and compelling evidence is an exception to the rule of double jeopardy.
Double jeopardy in Australia
The law regarding double jeopardy in Australia is very similar to other common law countries. There are a few statutory provisions regarding the same. Section 17 of the Criminal Code Act provides that a person who has been charged with a crime and has already been tried, convicted, or acquitted should not be made to face the same charge again under. This rule was created to make sure that people who were found not guilty of a crime would not be questioned by the police or faced charges for the same crime in the future. The accused party ought to be permitted to believe that their case has been resolved.
While double jeopardy may be used to claim defence in most criminal offences in Australia, the Criminal Code (Double Jeopardy) Amendment Act 2007 introduced significant changes to this principle. The Court may order an acquitted person to be retried for the offence of murder under Section 678B if it is satisfied that there is new and compelling evidence against the acquitted person in relation to the offence, and the order is in the interest of justice in all circumstances.
However, the people can file an appeal against the order of a trial court. This is because the purpose of the appeal is not to overturn the order of acquittal given by the trial court, and it remains valid. Rather, the appeal is made only to solve any questions of law that couldn’t be answered in the trial court.
Double jeopardy in Canada
The principle of double jeopardy is contained in Section 11(h) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. However, this law applies after a person has been convicted or acquitted. The Canadian law allows a person to file an appeal in the case of acquittal. This will not be considered to be double jeopardy, as the appeal will be considered as the continuation of the same trial. Also, in Canadian law, the court can substitute an acquittal with a conviction in certain rare cases. To successfully convert an acquittal into a conviction, the Supreme Court of Canada needs to prove that there was an error in law and that error led to the verdict.
If a document which was produced by the accused as genuine was found to be false or forged.
If a witness or expert gives testimony or opinion about the accused under oath the same is found to be erroneous.
If the judge who drafted the judgement violated any of his official duties to the case.
If the person acquitted confesses in or outside the court, that he committed the criminal offence.
The Code accordingly provides that the proceedings that were previously decided can be reopened if there are new facts and evidence that are pertinent to the case.
Is Section 300 CrPC different from Article 20(2) of the Indian Constitution
Even though both Article 20(2) of the Constitution and Section 300 of Cr.P.C. grant protection against the principle of double jeopardy, there are certain differences between the two provisions. On juxtaposing the provisions, the difference becomes clear. Since a detailed analysis of Section 300 of the Cr.P.C. has already been done in the previous heading, it is now pertinent to understand the essentials of Article 20(2).
Article 20(2) states that a person cannot be prosecuted for an offence more than once when he has already been convicted for the same. The essentials for the applicability of this Article are as follows:
The accused must be convicted of the offence.
The first prosecution must be valid and not null and void.
The second trial must not be an appeal or a continuation of the previous trial.
However, there are certain cases which are excluded from the ambit of this Article as they cannot be considered as prosecutions:
Proceedings for the confiscation of goods or fine under Section 167 of the Sea Customs Act, 1878.
Proceedings before an administrative or departmental tribunal.
In the case of Bhagwan Singh vs. Deputy Commissioner Sitapur (1962), the Petitioner was suspected of gross negligence in pursuance of his job as a clerk. As a result, departmental proceedings were initiated against him and subsequently, he was charged under Section 409 of the IPC. It was held by the court that the departmental proceedings do not come under the ambit of Article 20(2) of the Constitution of India and hence, does not constitute double jeopardy. This is because, the main reason for conducting disciplinary proceedings is to ascertain whether the officer concerned is suitable to continue with the service. On the other hand, the object of a criminal prosecution is to find out whether the act committed by the person concerned has satisfied all the ingredients of the offence as defined in the penal statute.
There are also certain exceptions to this Article:
The provision specified under this article is only applicable to criminal offences and not to civil suits, as the principle of res judicata is applied in civil suits.
Also, this clause has no application in cases of different offences arising out of the same facts, as the same is covered under the General Clauses Act.
The differences between the two provisions of double jeopardy have been analysed by the courts in various cases.
It was held by the Supreme Court in Manipur Administration v. Thokehom Bira Singh(1965), that, Article 20(2) of the Constitution is only applicable if the accused is convicted as a result of prosecution, i.e, it embodies the principle of autrefois convict only. However, Section 300 of the Code of Criminal Procedure combines both autrefois acquit and autrefois convict. Section 300 has also widened the scope of Section 300 by preventing a second trial of the accused on the same facts even if the offence is different if the offence is committed by him under Section 221(1) of the Code.
Also, the Supreme Court of India in Kolla Veera Raghav Rao v. Gorantla Venkateswara Rao & Others (2011), has observed the difference between Section 300 of the Cr.P.C and Article 20(2) of the Constitution. The court held that the scope of Section 300 of the Cr.P.C is wider than that of Article 20(2) of the Constitution. This is because, Article 20(2) of the Constitution provides that a person shall be prevented from undergoing trial for the same offence more than once when he has undergone a trial and convicted for the same. However, Section 300(1) of Cr. P.C states that no one can be tried and convicted for the same offence or even for a different offence but on the same facts irrespective of whether he was convicted or acquitted in the previous trial. This means that Article 20(2) of the Constitution only supports the principle of Autrefois convict whereas Section 300 of the Cr.P.C supports both Autrefois convict as well as Autrefois acquit.
The various differences between the two provisions are listed in the following table:
Article 20(2) of the Constitution
Section 300 CrPC
Article 20(2) states that no person can be put to trial for the same offence twice when he has already been convicted for the same.
Section 300 of Cr.P.C states that a person cannot be put to trial for the same offence more than once when he has already been convicted or acquitted for the same by a competent court.
The scope of Article 20(2) is narrow.
The scope of Section 300 is comparatively broad.
It provides protection only against the principle of autrefois convict.
It provides protection against the principles of autrefois acquit as well as autrefois convict.
It doesn’t prevent the retrial of a person in cases of different offences arising out of the same facts.
It prevents retrial of the person in cases of retrial of a person for different offences but similar facts.
Shortcomings of the doctrine of autrefois acquit and autrefois convict
Though this doctrine is very helpful in preventing a person from suffering punishment for the same offence more than once, it still has some limitations:
The accused, as per this doctrine, will only be prevented from retrial for the same offence. This might sometimes lead to injustice, as the accused might be put on trial for an offence that is similar to the one that he has committed. Also, this doctrine doesn’t apply to cases in which an accused has been convicted or acquitted of a smaller offence. Hence, this doctrine has a limited scope.
The terms ‘Autrefois acquit‘ and ‘Autrefois convict’ are not defined anywhere and are left to the interpretation of the courts. Hence, this leads to a scope of arbitrary usage of power by courts, and there have been instances where these principles have been interpreted differently by different judges which leads to ambiguity and confusion.
Section 300 of Cr.P.C. provides for certain cases in which retrial is not possible, such as when the accused has absconded or the trial has been vitiated because of the accused or because of the prosecution. In such cases, the principle of autrefois acquit can be disadvantageous as there is a possibility that a person who has committed a crime might escape punishment.
There is also no provision for compensation to the accused who has faced the trial wrongfully and has been acquitted. This might lead to injustice to the accused as the accused might have spent a lot of money during the trial which was conducted wrongfully and he has no means to recover the same.
However, there is an exception to this point. Section 211 of the Indian Penal Code states the punishment that needs to be awarded to a person who has committed the offence of malicious prosecution. This section provides that if any person institutes criminal proceedings against another person with an intention to cause injury to that person or falsely charges any person with having committed an offence shall be punished with imprisonment up to a term of two years, or fine or both. However, as per Section 74 of the Limitation Act 1963, this suit should be filed within one year.
Protection against double jeopardy : the doctrine of res judicata
The doctrine of res judicata, also known as estoppel by the record, is based on the maxim, “Res Judicata Pro Veritate Accipitur”, which means that when a particular matter has already been adjudicated by a competent court, the same cannot be relitigated once again. The underlying principles of both double jeopardy and res judicata are the same, that is, no one should get vexed twice for the same offence.
One of the earliest articulations within the common law of the doctrine of res judicata can be observed in the case of Duchess of Kingston, 1776. In deciding this case, Sir William de Grey, C.J. laid down that, “The judgement of a court of concurrent jurisdiction, directly upon the point, is, as a plea, a bar, or as evidence, conclusive between the same parties, upon the same matter, directly in question in another Court.” This rule is different from the rule against double jeopardy because res judicata permits the admissibility of only such evidence in a subsequent trial, which is aimed to upset the finding of a fact reached by a competent Court in a previous trial.
The principle of res judicata can be best understood by looking into the observations of Lord Mac Dermott in the case of Sambasivam v. Public Prosecutor, Federation of Malaya (1950), in which he said, “The effect of the verdict of acquittal pronounced by a competent lawful charge and a lawful trial is not completely started by saying that the person accused cannot be tried again for the same offence. To that, it must be added that the verdict is binding and conclusive in all subsequent proceedings between the parties for adjudication.”
This observation of Lord Mac Dermott is important because he states that whenever an acquittal is ordered by a competent court, it not only acts as a bar to prevent further trial of the person so acquitted, but also that the findings and evidence that are observed by the court are binding and can be used in the subsequent trial of a person, even if the trial is pertaining to a different offence.
In India, this doctrine was recognised to be universally applicable in the case of Daryao v. State of UP (1961). In this case, the court held that the rule of res judicata applies to a petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution. If the petitioner files a petition in the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution and it is dismissed on the merits, it will be construed as res judicata to prevent the petitioner from filing a similar case in the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution.
Hence, the main conditions that need to be fulfilled for this rule to apply are as follows:
The parties in both trials must be the same.
This doctrine is only applicable in civil cases and not in criminal cases.
The fact in issue, irrespective of whether it is proved or not, must be similar in both trials.
Judicial pronouncements
Sangeeta Ben Mahendra Bhai Patel v. State of Gujarat & Anr. (2011)
Facts of the case
The Appellant in the instant case was convicted by the trial court under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. However, the Appellant appealed this decision and was subsequently acquitted by the District Judge. The Respondent, aggrieved by the decision, filed an appeal before the High Court of Gujarat. The Appellant filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C to quash the appeal filed by the Respondent claiming that it constituted double jeopardy.
Issues in the case
Can accused be tried under NI Act as well as under IPC on similar set of allegations or will it amount to double jeopardy.
Judgement of the court
The court in this case held that though there is some kind of overlapping pertaining to the facts of the case, but, the ingredients of both the offences are different. This is because, Thus, the subsequent case is not barred by any statutory provisions.
Thomas Dana v. State of Punjab (1959)
Facts of the case
In this case, the appellant wanted to take out some foreign exchange from India which was confiscated by the customs authorities as per the rules mentioned in the Sea Customs Act. After that, he was put on trial and was also convicted for the offence before a criminal court under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act and the Sea Customs Act. Hence, he appealed before the Punjab High Court, which was dismissed. Therefore, he filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court on the ground that his prosecution was barred as per Article 20(2).
Issues in the case
Whether the proceedings before the custom authorities can be considered as a prosecution within the meaning of Article 20(2).
Judgement of the court
The Supreme Court observed that, for any prosecution to constitute double jeopardy and be barred under Article 20 (2), the following requirements must be met.
There must be a previous prosecution.
The Accused must be punished in the previous prosecution.
The punishment must be for the same offence.
Union of India v. Sunil Kumar Sarkar (2001)
Facts of the case
An employee of the Border Road Organisation was court-martialed and found to be guilty of some of the charges framed against him. Hence, he was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year. After that, he was dismissed from service under the relevant Service Rules.
Issues in the case
Whether the dismissal under the Service Rules can be considered as prosecution to constitute double jeopardy.
Judgement of the court
In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the punishment didn’t constitute double jeopardy under Article 20(2) as both proceedings were initiated against two differentfields, even thoughthe nature of the act was such that the crime arose from the same act. Hence, it didn’t amount to double jeopardy.
Satwant Singh v. State of Punjab (1960)
Facts of the case
In this case, the accused was charged with murder and was acquitted by the trial court. However, the state government filed a fresh charge against the accused under a different provision of law.
Issues in the case
Whether the framing of fresh charge after the pronouncement of acquittal of trial court constitutes double jeopardy.
Judgement of the court
The Supreme Court held that the fresh charge was not maintainable and violated the principle of autrefois acquit. The court observed that the accused could not be tried for the same offence under a different provision of law if the essential ingredients of the offence were the same.
Conclusion
In India, a person is deemed innocent until he is proven guilty. This is done to protect the rights of the accused, even if it means that a person who has committed a crime escapes punishment in certain cases. Hence, once a person accused of a crime has faced the consequences for the same by means of punishment, it is unfair to put him through the same peril for the second time. This is the very reason why the principle of double jeopardy has been recognised as a fundamental right under Article 20(2) of our Constitution. Also, the doctrines of autrefois acquit and autrefois convict are recognised under Section 300 of Cr.P.C. to prevent unlawful prosecution of a person for the second time. However, it is very important to make sure that these doctrines and principles are used efficiently and are not used as a shield to protect the people who are guilty of offences and to prevent them from being held liable.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the meaning of the term double jeopardy?
The principle of double jeopardy states that a person cannot be tried for the same offence more than once. This means that when a case has been tried and judgement has been given by a court, the same case cannot be filed subsequently in the same court as it amounts to double jeopardy.
What are the provisions which explain double jeopardy in India?
In India, the principle of double jeopardy can be found in Article 20(2) of the Constitution, Section 26 of the General Clauses Act and Section 300 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1974. However, these provisions have their own differences which have already been explained in the article.
What is the meaning of autrefois acquit and autrefois convict?
Both the terms ‘Autrefois acquit’ and ‘Autrefois convict’ are derived from French and mean ‘previously acquitted’ and ‘previously convicted’ respectively. They refer to double jeopardy which is an important principle of criminal jurisprudence that states that a person cannot be tried for an offence for which he was previously convicted or previously acquitted. An accused who was acquitted in a previous trial is called an ‘Autrefois acquit’ and the accused who was convicted in a previous trial is called an ‘Autrefois convict’.
Is the doctrine of autrefois acquit and autrefois convict similar to the principle of double jeopardy?
There is a difference between the two principles. This is because the principle of double jeopardy is only applicable in cases in which the accused has been acquitted in the previous trial and will not be applicable when he is convicted for the same. However, the doctrine of autrefois acquit and autrefois convict is applicable irrespective of whether the accused is convicted or acquitted in the previous trial.
References
Ratanlal & Dhirajlal- The Code of Criminal Procedure – 22nd Edition
Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:
Content marketing is a modern and popular marketing approach in which companies focus on creating attractive and valuable content for a selected group of audience. Attracting and engaging, as well as retaining target customers, could be the primary objective of a content marketing strategy. In content marketing, companies prefer to develop valuable articles along with videos, podcasts, and other media to achieve overall marketing objectives. In this article, the importance of content marketing, especially for small businesses, will be explained. Also, how content marketing strategies and special tips can be utilised to enhance a loyal consumer base will be discussed in this article.
Content marketing
Content marketing deals with distributing and developing valuable content for target customers to generate leads for the business. Increasing internet awareness and the use of mobile technology have created a better scope for content marketing strategies in the market. In this modern age, companies prefer to use different types of social media channels, along with blog sites, mobile applications and other digital mediums, for the implementation of marketing strategies.
For example, creating and posting attractive content on the official social media handles of businesses has helped to enhance customer engagement. Especially small businesses can use social media platforms to reach a large number of potential customers, which is essential for enhancing overall business performance. Apart from that, these platforms also support businesses in resolving queries and complaints from customers and provide essential information about products or services to potential customers. As per the Demand Metric, approximately 90% of businesses are using content marketing strategies to enhance business performance. Currently, more than 4.4 billion people across the globe are using different social media platforms for various purposes. This data indicates that even small businesses can use social media platforms to reach a large number of customers. This statistic shows the importance of content marketing in small business management.
Overview of small businesses
Small businesses play a significant role in the economic development of the world. These businesses generally support the global economy by creating more job opportunities, investing in capital innovation, and working for social welfare or local community development. According to the World Bank, formal SME businesses contribute more than 40% of the total GDP in emerging economies. In order to maintain a balance between the global workforce and employment opportunities, approximately 600 million jobs will be required by the end of 2030. However, in emerging economies, formal SME businesses are responsible for creating approximately 7 out of 10 job opportunities in the market. Hence, governments in various countries are providing additional support to small businesses. On the other hand, managing business during market uncertainties, i.e., a lack of financial assets, and other resources and strong market competition, could be major challenges that small business entrepreneurs face while operating in the market. Small business organisations can use digital marketing platforms to promote products or services as well as create a positive brand image for the firm in the market. Creating attractive content would help small businesses attract potential customers, which is essential for enhancing overall business performance and achieving corporate objectives. Apart from that, customer relationship management can be improved by using content marketing strategies.
Types of content marketing strategies
There are different types of content marketing strategies that small businesses can use to promote their brand and achieve other marketing objectives. The study and analysis of customer demographics, including technological awareness and accessibility, need to be considered while selecting a specific content marketing strategy for the firm.
Content marketing strategy
Description
Benefits for small businesses
Website Blogs
Small businesses can create and publish informative, educational, and entertaining blogs on different websites.
This strategy would help small businesses enhance organic website traffic and customer engagement.
Social media channels
Different social media platforms, such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and LinkedIn, can be used to share valuable content with target audiences.
Customer engagement and brand awareness can be improved through social media marketing strategies.
Podcasts
In this content marketing strategy, small businesses can create audio content to share stories or any other important information with their target audience.
Information about the company or brand, including products or services, can be spread through podcasts.
User-generated content (UGC)
This is one of the popular content marketing strategies in which target customers can take an active part in the marketing strategies of the firm through testimonials, reviews, and different social media posts.
Target customer engagement can be improved through a user-generated content strategy.
Influencer marketing
In this content marketing strategy, small businesses need to establish strategic partnerships or collaborations with social media influencers or industry experts to promote the brand or specific product among niche target customers.
The effectiveness of content marketing strategies can be improved through influencer marketing strategies.
Infographics
Infographics can be defined as visual representations of specific information, which includes valuable text and graphics.
Developing attractive infographics could help to enhance the knowledge of target customers regarding particular brands or products.
Digital Events
Small businesses can organise virtual events to educate target customers as well as demonstrate company products or services. For example, the virtual fashion show.
With the help of online events, small businesses would be able to provide real-time product demonstrations to their customers, which is essential for enhancing overall sales of that product or service.
How small businesses can implement content marketing strategies for enhancing business performance
Content marketing strategies would help businesses expand their reach, enhance audience engagement, and drive business growth. Small business entrepreneurs need to keep their patience and use consistent effort while implementing content marketing strategies for businesses. Small business organisations need to follow specific steps or guidance for effectively developing and implementing content marketing strategies:
Develop objectives: Before developing content marketing strategies, small businesses need to identify and establish a specific goal along with objectives for content marketing initiatives. Generating leads, enhancing website traffic, increasing overall business sales, and creating brand awareness could be major objectives that small businesses might select during the content marketing strategy development process. These goals could help businesses measure the success or failure of their content marketing strategies.
Understand your audience: In this step, small business organisations need to create customer personas by evaluating information about customer needs along with pain points as well as motivations and preferences. Here, the management can use analytics tools to gain information about consumer buying behaviour and interest areas.
Develop attractive content: After gaining information on potential customer interest and behaviour, the management needs to focus on developing attractive content. Creating blogs along with videos, as well as infographics and podcasts, would help small businesses maintain engagement with their target audience. Focusing on developing quality content that can educate, entertain, and resolve customer problems would help to attract more audiences.
SEO Optimisation: The management can use keyword research tools such as WordStream or SEMrush to identify relevant keywords. Creative content using relevant keywords would help small businesses enhance website traffic and customer engagement.
Develop a Schedule: In content marketing strategy, small businesses need to develop a specific plan, including a schedule, in advance. This schedule would help small businesses maintain consistency in publishing relevant content for their target audience. Consistency in content marketing can help to develop interest and build trust among potential customers.
Promotion of content: In order to promote the brand through a content marketing strategy, the management of small businesses can use different social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and LinkedIn. The management can share its content with the target audience by using social media platforms. Email marketing strategies can also be used to promote the company’s content. Apart from this, small businesses would be able to resolve customer queries and complaints as well as enhance audience engagement through social media platforms. Influencer marketing or collaboration strategies can also be used to reach niche audiences.
Management and control: In this stage, the management of small businesses needs to stay updated with existing market trends and consumer demand. Factors such as economic situation, changing trends, government regulations, and other external situations could influence consumer buying behaviour. Hence, small businesses need to study and analyse all these factors while developing content marketing strategies. This practice would help small businesses reduce the risk of a failure as well as enhance the effectiveness of content marketing strategies.
Challenges that small businesses might face while developing and implementing content marketing strategies
There are various challenges that small businesses might face while developing and implementing a content marketing strategy. They are:
Limited resources:
Small businesses must invest a particular amount of capital in developing and implementing different content marketing strategies. Limited budgets, a lack of specialised talent and expertise, and time constraints could create challenges for small businesses to develop and implement a content marketing strategy. Small businesses should hire SEO experts and adopt advanced technologies to successfully promote their businesses through content marketing strategies.
Creating quality content:
Knowledge and expertise could be required for creating high-quality content for a content marketing strategy. The management of small businesses needs to follow a particular schedule to maintain consistency in publishing content.
Market changes:
Small business organisations must stay updated with existing or popular trends in content marketing strategies. Customer preferences and market trends frequently change, which may create challenges for small businesses trying to balance their day-to-day marketing operations. Apart from this, small businesses also need to be aware of algorithm changes and search engine updates to develop effective content for target audiences.
Measuring the success or failure of content marketing strategy:
It could be a challenging task for small businesses to calculate the return on investment needed to measure the impact of a particular content marketing strategy.
Content distribution:
Small business organisations have to invest their time and effort to reach the right target audience. Due to strong market competition and increasing online noise, they can face challenges in reaching their target audience through content marketing strategies.
Conclusion
In conclusion, content marketing strategies can help small businesses reach a large number of target customers, which is essential for enhancing sales and creating a strong brand image for the firm. Due to an increase in internet awareness and mobile technology, the scope of content marketing strategies has increased. Through content marketing strategies, small businesses can develop and distribute valuable content in the form of text, videos and pictures to generate leads and achieve other business objectives. Small business organisations play a supportive role in the global economic development process. Website blogs, along with podcasts, influencer marketing, and user-generated content (UGC), are the different types of content marketing strategies that small business organisations can use to attract a large number of potential customers. Small business entrepreneurs or management must establish a plan before implementing content marketing strategies.
Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:
This article is written by Tanishq Khandelwal and co-authored by Shriya Singh. It discusses in detail the meaning, features, history, types and legality of strikes. Further, it delves into its fundamental values and consequences. Along with it, it also talks about illegal strikes.
To reside and settle in any part of the territory of India; and
To practise any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business
However, a strike is not expressly recognized in the Constitution of India. The Supreme Court settled the Case of Kameshwar Prasad v. The State of Bihar (1958) by stating that strike is not a fundamental right. Government employees have no legal or moral right to go on strikes.
Introduction
One vital piece of legislation that governs the Indian Labour Law with regard to trade unions and individual workers engaged in any industry in India is the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It was put into effect in order to provide access to tools and machinery as well as procedures for investigation and resolution, irrespective of the size of the industry.
Labour strikes in India are not uncommon and they occur across various industries and sectors. These strikes are often a result of disputes between workers and employees regarding wages working conditions benefits or other likewise issues. The number of labour strikes can vary depending upon the prevailing socio-economic and political factors in the country.
The right to strike is acknowledged by the legislation as a statutory right. It also establishes requirements that must be met in order for a strike to be legitimate and any violation of them would regard the strike as unlawful or illegal.
Meaning of strike
As per the Cambridge Dictionary, “Strike is to refuse to continue working because of an argument with an employer about working conditions, pay levels, or job losses”.
A strike is a powerful weapon used by trade unions or other associations or workers to put across their demands or grievances by employers or management of industries. In another way, it is the stoppage of work caused by the mass refusal in response to grievances. Workers put pressure on the employers by refusing to work till the fulfilment of their demands. Strikes may be fruitful for workers’ welfare or they may cause economic loss to the country.
In protecting the legitimate rights and interests of workers, the right to strike plays a vital role. It is one of the most effective weapons of the worker in its struggle with capital to secure economic justice, as it empowers the vulnerable workers to fight oppressive cases when no possible constructive option is left to them. Today, strikes are resorted to by every section of society to express their grievances and to put forth their demands. The strike has its foundation in the sentiment of a worker that his wages and working conditions are unfair. The labourer’s privilege to quit work and subsequently bring a forced readjustment of conditions of employment is the very basic strength and desired outcome of any strike.
The right to strike is considered an essential component of the right to association. If the right to strike of the workers is denied, then the right to form unions would be an empty right. The freedom of association cannot be fully exercised if the association is not able to protect its member’s interests and achieve the objectives for which it was formed. The essence of forming and joining a trade union would be ineffective if workers could not exercise the right to strike as a legitimate right. It is also complimentary to freedom from slavery and forced labour. The denial of the freedom to strike means that employees can be forced to work contrary to their will and will not be allowed to stop working at will, thereby depriving them of their freedom from forced labour and constituting a grave insult to justice.
The right to strike is not only a significant right but is an integral part of collective bargaining. Where collective bargaining breaks down, workers tend to resort to strikes to get their demands fulfilled. For the trade unions, the threat of a strike is a useful weapon for compelling employers to come forward for bargaining. It plays a rightful role as an incentive for management and labour to get their differences settled. The two sides are compelled to make compromises and negotiate so as to come to an agreement because of the hovering prospect of economic sanctions. Taking away the right of workers to strike may only force them to adopt different protest strategies that they see as alternatives, which may equally be injurious and detrimental to the relationship between labour and management. Thus, the denial of the right to strike amounts to a violation of all these basic freedoms, as the common goal of safeguarding the interests of the workers cannot be achieved by either of them individually.
However, the importance and nature of strikes are subjective, which is why they vary from place to place. It may be used as an organising device or a means of general protest. It is also used as a political demonstration and as an integral part of the collective bargaining process, which is used to induce agreement.
The International Labour Organisation adopted a resolution on January 28, 1993, and the Fourteenth International Conference of Labour Statisticians adopted the interim resolution that replaced the former. The word “Strike” was defined as “a temporary work stoppage affected by one or more groups of workers with a view to enforcing or resisting demands or expressing grievances, or supporting other workers in their demands or grievances“.
Strike under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947
For strike, the Industrial Dispute Act under 2 (q) defines strikes as “a cessation of work by a body of persons employed in any industry acting in combination, or a concerted refusal, or a refusal, under a common understanding of any number of persons who are or have been so employed to continue to work or to accept employment”.
In the case of “Cox and Kings Limited v. Their Employees(1977)”, the Court held that a strike can be considered justified if it is in connection with a current labour dispute or directed against an unfair labour practice of the employer.
Under the following situation as given under Section 22, on these grounds the strikes can be considered illegal:
Without giving to employer notice of strike within six weeks before striking; or
Within fourteen days of giving such notice; or
Before the expiry of the date of strike specified in any such notice as aforesaid; or
During the pendency of any conciliation proceedings before a conciliation officer and seven days after the conclusion of such proceedings.
But herein it is important to notice that these arrangements don’t forbid the labourers from demonstration yet expect them to satisfy the condition before taking to the streets. Further, these arrangements apply to open utility assistance in particular. The Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 doesn’t explicitly specify who takes to the streets. Nevertheless, the definition of the strike itself suggests that the strikers must be persons, employed in any industry to do work.
Further, the provisions under Section 23 are general in nature. It imposes general restrictions on declaring strike in breach of contract in both public as well as non-public utility services in the following circumstances mainly: –
During the pendency of conciliation proceedings before a board and till the expiry of 7 days after the conclusion of such proceedings;
During the pendency and 2 months after the conclusion of proceedings before a Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal;
During the pendency and 2 months after the conclusion of the arbitrator, a notification has been issued under subsection 3 (a) of Section 10 A;
During any period in which a settlement or award is in operation in respect of any of the matters covered by the settlement or award.
The main purpose of this Section is to maintain an untroubled and disciplined atmosphere when conciliation and negotiation proceedings are in the process without any disturbance.
The necessary requirements for the strike to exist are
There must be a cessation of work. Cessation means abandonment, stoppage of work or reluctance to perform the duties of their posts. It is the most important characteristic of the strike. It is stoppage of work or refusal to continue work that the employees are required to do. The cessation of work must be voluntary and temporary. Permanent cessation of work would result in termination of the employment contract. There must be an actual cessation of work. A mere apprehension or threat of a strike or resolution to go on at some future date is not a strike. Cessation of work may be inside the very establishment, even on their seats.
The cessation of work must be by persons employed in any industry. It means that the establishment must be an industry within the definition of ‘industry’ provided under the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947. Within the meaning of Section 2(q), if the establishment in which the strike is carried out is not covered under the definition of industry, even though all other ingredients of the strike are fulfilled, it will not be a strike.
The strikers must have been acting in combination or concerted action under common understanding. The word ‘acting in combination’ came up for interpretation before the Industrial Tribunal Bengal in the case of Shamnuggar Jute Factory Ltd. vs. Their Workmen (1963). The Tribunal observed that the words ‘acting in combination’ imply that the group of people in employment must be demonstrated to be working in concert, with their psychology oriented towards achieving a particular objective, such as the group’s direct common objective being to terminate employment. Individual worker’s work stoppages do not constitute a strike. Thus, a strike implies cessation of work by a number of employees under common understanding. Unless the common intention of a number of workers is proved, it would not amount to a strike.
The strike must be the result of an industrial dispute- The cessation of work must be preceded by an industrial dispute. According to the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947, an industrial dispute arises from a disagreement or conflict between-
Employers and employers
Employers and workmen
Workmen and workmen,
The dispute or disagreement ought to be related to
Employment
Non-employment
Terms of employment
Conditions of service of any persons
The dispute or difference under Section 2(k) must be a real and substantial difference with an element of persistence and continuity until resolved. The dispute or difference, if not resolved, is likely to endanger the peace of industry and the community.
The person must be employed in an industry according to the definition of strike for the applicability of this Act. The person must be employed in an industry. In Bangalore Water Supply & Sewerage Board vs. Rajappa (1978), the Supreme Court interpreted the definition of the industry as covering both the private and government industries. Thus, all industries, irrespective of their status, whether they are owned and run by the state or by entrepreneurs, are covered under the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947.
Illegal Strikes
There are penal provisions contained in the Act to deal with the penalties in respect of strikes. The penalties are contained in Section 26 to Section 29 of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947.
If a worker initiates, persists in, or takes any other action in order to support a strike that is prohibited by this Act, they may face a suspension, which can be a month-long, a fine of up to fifty rupees, or more.
The act of commencing a strike must be a voluntary act. A worker cannot be said to have commenced any strike if he can establish that he was willing and prepared to join work and made efforts for the same but was prevented by other workmen from doing so. Workmen can be said to be continuing a strike if he is voluntarily absent from work. Workmen can also act in furtherance by abetting the strike.
Penalty for instigation
Anyone who encourages or incites others to participate in a strike that is prohibited by this Act may face up to six months in prison, a fine of up to one thousand rupees, or both.
The literal meaning of the terms ‘instigates’ or ‘incites’ is to push forward, support, or stimulate acting out. Something more profound must be involved than just asking someone to perform an act.
Penalty for Breach of Settlement or Award
A strike or lockout about any of the subject matter covered by a settlement or award that occurs during the time the settlement or award is in effect is illegal.
Protection for people refusing to participate in illegal lockouts or strikes
The Act provides protection to persons who refuse to participate in any illegal strike or lockout. It provides that if any person refuses to participate in or continues to participate in any strike which is illegal, he shall not be subjected to any expulsion from the trade union or society or penalty or deprivation of any right by reason of such refusal or any action taken by him.
Regulation of strikes
The appropriate government is empowered to prohibit the continuance of any strike or lockout in relation to an industrial dispute that has been brought forward to a Board, Labour Court, Tribunal or even to the National Tribunal. If an industrial dispute is referred and an order prohibiting any strike or lockout has been made by the appropriate government, the strike or lockout shall be illegal if it is continued after the order has been made.
Similarly, in accordance with Section 10A (4-A), the relevant government may, by order, forbid the continuation of any strike or lockout related to an industrial dispute that has been referred to arbitration after a notification has been sent out in accordance with Section 10A(3-A).
Features of strike
According to Ludwing Teller, the word ‘strike’, in its broad sense, corresponds to a disagreement between an employer and his employees that results in a mutually beneficial suspension of employment.
He described four characteristics of a strike, which are as follows:
A relationship between the person or persons who initiate the strike and the person or persons against whom the strike is called is established,
The relationship as one of employer or employee is constituted,
The ongoing dispute between the parties and the utilisation by labour of the weapon of concerted refusal to continue to work on the strategy of convincing or coercing adherence to the demands of the workmen,
The contention advanced by workers is that even in a state of hostile suspension, although work ceases, the employment relationship is deemed to continue.
History of legal regulation of strikes in India
Just like in most parts of the world, strikes in India also started as a result of the modern factory system. India made a late entry into the industrial phase of economic evolution due to colonial rule. The arrival of industrialisation in India could be traced to the 1850s, with the formation of the cotton and jute mills in Bombay and Calcutta. After this, both in Bombay and Bengal, the number of factories began to increase. During this time, the growth of the industries brought about both mass production and social evils like the exploitation of women, child labour and disappointing conditions at the workplace.
The First Factories Act was passed by the British government in 1881 on the recommendations of the First Factory Commission, which was appointed in 1875. However, this Act proved to be inadequate as it failed to do much for the welfare of workers.
There were many strikes for the improvement of the conditions of workers. One of the first strikes was in 1877 at the Express Mills in Nagpur over wages. The province of Bombay and Madras alone recorded twenty-five strikes between 1882 and 1890.
A social reformer who made a significant contribution to the labour movement was Narayan Meghji Lokhande, who organised the first labour association, namely the Bombay Mill Hand Association, in 1890 for the redressal of grievances of its members and to urge improvement of the Factories Act of 1881. He also started a labour journal, Dinbandhu, in 1890 to place before the authorities and employers the legitimate grievances of the workers. It was in 1891 that the new Factories Act was passed. The workers and the leaders were not satisfied even with the new Factories Act. There were strikes in Bombay, Ahmadabad and Calcutta during the period from 1894- 1897.
The First World War happened in August 1914. The price of essential commodities had risen due to the war, leading to a higher cost of living and an increase in the employment of workers in factories. Thus, the urge for workers to unite strengthened. There were a number of strikes by the workers against the rising cost of living, ruthless exploitation and suppression.
The Trade Disputes Act was passed in 1929 in India on the model of the British Industrial Courts Act of 1919 and the British Trade Disputes and Trade Unions Act of 1927. For the first time, restrictions were imposed on the right to strike by this Act in public utility services, where a strike without 14 days prior notice was illegal and punishable. In India, Labour Day was celebrated for the first time on May 1, 1927.
After the emergence of the unfortunate World War II in 1939, the number of strikes increased from 101 to 169. To deal with the anti-British political atmosphere in the country, the Government of India issued notifications and ordinances both at the central and provincial levels to restrain strikes and lockouts and provide for compulsory conciliation and adjudication of industrial disputes.
Rule 81-A of the Defence of India Rules, 1939 was added by notification in January of that year, which prohibited strikes and lock-outs in industries without 14 days prior notice. By this rule, no distinction was made between the public utility services and others. A strike or a lock-out was also prohibited when a trade dispute was referred to a statutory enquiry or for conciliation or adjudication, or during the pendency of the proceedings and two months thereafter.
The Defence of India Rules were amended in 1943 by the Government of India, and a new Rule 56-A was introduced for the prevention of Hartals or stoppages of work in places of employment that were caused by the arrest of Gandhiji. The contravention of this provision would attract the punishment for imprisonment for a term that could extend to five years, a fine of up to Rupees five lakhs, or both. During this period, the Industrial Relations Act, 1946 was passed, and the Industrial Disputes Bill was proposed.
After independence, industrial unrest was at its peak due to severe economic crises, a rise in food grain prices, and shortages in supplies of food, raw materials and other essential commodities. There were 1,811 strikes.
The Government made serious attempts to maintain industrial peace to raise production and rebuild the economy. The Government enacted the most important legislation with regard to labour relations, that is, the Industrial Dispute Act of 1947 incorporated the fundamental ideas and essential principles of Rule 81-A of the Defence of India Rules of 1942.
Restrictions and limits pertaining to the procedure of the right to strike were imposed by the Industrial Dispute Act of 1947. The Industrial Truce Resolution was adopted on December 18, 1947, at the Tripartite Industries Conference, which was attended by leading industrialists, labour leaders and the Government with the aim of maintaining industrial peace. The Resolution obligated labour and management to give their consent to sustaining industrial peace and absolving strikes, lockouts, and production contractions for a period of three years.
The Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1955, were issued by the President of India, under which government servants were prohibited from participating in any demonstration or resorting to any strike in connection with any matter pertaining to their conditions of service.
Till 1957, even in the Conduct Rules, there was no specific prohibition of strikes by government employees. However, strikes were treated as an unauthorised absence from duty, which was subject to disciplinary action by the authority concerned.
Types of strikes
Based on the phenomena of strikes around the world, strikes can be categorised into economic strikes, sympathy strikes, general strikes, sit-down strikes, slow down strikes, hunger strikes and wildcat strikes have been experienced.
Economic Strike
Such a strike happens due to economic demands like increments in wages and allowances like house rent allowance, transport allowances, bonuses etc.
An economic strike is a strike concerning the wages, hours and other conditions of work and terms of employment of the worker. In economic strikes, the workers demand betterment regarding their wages, house rent allowance, travelling allowance, dearness allowance and other facilities such as privilege leave and casual leave.
Sympathy Strike
In such a strike union or workers of one industry join the strikes already hailed by other unions or workers. A sympathetic strike is one in which striking employees have no demands or grievances of their own but strike for the purpose of aiding others, either directly or indirectly. A sympathetic strike is a strike within the purview of the Industrial Disputes Act.
In the case of S. Kumbalingam vs. Indian Metal and Metallurgical Corporation, Madras (1963), it was held that when the workers in concert absent themselves out of sympathy for some cause wholly unrelated to their employment or even in regard to the condition of workers in service under other management, such absence could not be held to be a strike, as the essential element of the intention to use it against the management is absent. The management would be entitled to take disciplinary proceedings against the workmen for their absence on the ground of breach of the condition of service.
General strike
This strike was intended to increase the political pressure on the ruling party by all unions or members in a region or state.
It normally refers to a large-scale strike organised by employees belonging to an industry, region or entire country. Since these strikes are organised on a mass basis, they create a huge impact and often put a lot of pressure on employers. However, these strikes are not intended against any individual employer.
A few examples of general strikes in India are the nationwide strikes of November 1991, June 1992, September 1993, September 1994 and September 1998.
Sit-in Strikes
Other names for sit-in strikes are pen-down, tools-down, and stay-in. In these strikes, employees report for work but do not work. These strikes may sometimes be planned and other times spontaneous, depending on the happenings and urgency of the situation. In these forms of strikes, employees peacefully enter their place of work without indicating their intention. But after entering their workplace, they do not do their work. If blue-collared workmen do not do their work, it may be a tool-down strike, and if white-collared workmen do not work, it is a pen-down strike.
In such cases, workers hold strikes at the workplace and none of the workers stay absent from duty but they all refuse to work till their demands are fulfilled.
In the case of Punjab National Bank, Limited vs. Its Workmen (1963), the Court held that a pen-down strike falls within the definition of strike under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and is not per se illegal. In this case, the employees of the appellant bank commenced a pen-down strike, followed by a general strike during the pendency of arbitration proceedings. The strike was peaceful and non-violent. The Court held that the pen-down strike did not disentitle the employees to reinstatement.
Slow down strike
It means workers or unions don’t refuse to work but put pressure on industries to get their demand by reducing or restricting the output of the production industry. Slow down, also referred to as go-slow or work-to-rule strikes, are forms of strikes wherein the employees work but not up to their usual capacity or level. They reduce their output intentionally by working below the usual benchmark they had previously set to show their protest to the employer. In this type of strike, the employee’s revenue is badly affected, even though the employees continue to get their wages. Here, the employee strictly follows the rules and just refuses to deviate from them. The workmen reduce the speed of work or adopt dilatory tactics to reduce the usual production while pretending to be engaged in work.
In the case of Bharat Sugar Mills Ltd. vs. Jai Singh (1961), the Court held that going slow is a deliberate delay of production by workmen pretending to be engaged in the factory. It would not be wrong to look at it and call it dishonest. Delaying production and eventually reducing the output, the workers claim to have remained employed, thus being in a position to be entitled to full wages. Go-slow is likely to be much more harmful than total cessation of work by strike, as during a strike much of the machinery can be fully turned off. During the go slow the machinery is kept going at a reduced speed, which is often extremely damaging to machinery parts.
Hunger strike
It is one of the painful strikes by the strikers where workers go on strike without having food/water to redress their grievances. The employees of Kingfisher Airlines went on hunger strikes for salary dues for several months.
The employees undertake fasting by abstaining from both food and work as a means of protest in a hunger strike. Since there is a cessation of work due to employees’ participation in the fast, it is viewed as a strike. The purpose of such a hunger strike is to put forward their grievance to the employers and get the attention of the government and the general public to the cause of the strike. It is non-violent and is not strictly a strike under the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947. In a hunger strike, there is not necessarily a cessation of work. But when a hunger strike usually results in their cessation or suspension of work, then it would of course constitute a strike.
In the case of Pipraich Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Pipraich Sugar Mills Mazdoor (1956), the Supreme Court held that a hunger strike amounted to a strike where workmen who held key positions in the factory went on a hunger strike with the result that other workmen who came to work could not do work.
Wildcat strike
Such a strike happens by the workers without the consent of the union and authority. In 2004, advocates went on a wildcat strike at civil courts in Bangalore to protest the remarks allegedly made by an assistant commissioner against them.
However, if we look at the history of strikes, it is found that strikes mostly occur due to issues related to wages by the employers to the workers.
Legal Strike
A strike is legal if it does not violate any provisions of the statute. Though the right to strike is not expressly recognised as a legal right under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, strikes not resorted to in contravention of the provisions of Sections 22 and 23 of the said Act are considered as legal as enunciated by Section 24 of the said Act.
Illegal Strike
In India, strikes became illegal, not because of objects but because of the breach of statutory provisions. Thus, strikes in contravention of the provisions of the Industrial Dispute Act, of 1947, the Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, of 1964, and the Essential Services Maintenance Act of 1981 are illegal. The circumstances under which strikes shall be illegal and under which they shall be deemed to be legal are provided in Section 24 of the Act.
Particular Strike
Particular strikes are limited in scope and are usually confined to a single plant or a few plants or to a single trade or occupation. Whatever the form or method may be, it is a strike within the meaning of the Act, provided it fulfils the requirement of Section 2(q) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. However, the nature and importance of strikes change from place to place, as they are not static. It may be used as an organising device or even as a means of general protest. Its use could be extended to a political demonstration or as a significant part of the collective bargaining process used to induce agreement.
Few Instances of Strikes in India
In March 2012, nurses employed by different hospitals in Chennai went on strike for 7 days demanding from hospital management hike of basic wages to Rs 15000/-, apart from leave benefits and annual increments. All the well-known hospitals like Apollo, Fortis, Max etc. came to a standstill because of the strike.
In January 2014, Kingfisher employees went on hunger strike due to non-payment of salary for 17 months.
In September 2016, tens of millions of Indian workers in the public sector went on strike demanding higher wages. Banks and power stations were kept shut and public transportation systems froze in some of the states. Later the government considered their demands and increased the wages. It was the world’s largest-ever strike.
Common reasons for strikes
There are many causes of strikes. Anything that affects the minds of the workers can induce them to go on strike. They are now conscious of their rights. Wherever there is a violation of the rights of workers or there is unfair labour practices or unnecessary victimisation, it is bound to lead to an atmosphere of strike. The causes of strikes can be divided into the following categories-
Economic causes
Economic causes include questions pertaining to wages, bonuses and allowances; retrenchment of workers by the employer; a faulty retrenchment system; leave; and so on. Low wages, irrespective of rising prices, demand for a rise in dearness allowance, intolerable working and living conditions, issues pertaining to hours of work, etc. are some other economic causes that instigated a number of strikes in India.
Demand for wages– In India, the remuneration paid to workers for their work is not adequate to meet their expenses. They can neither provide for the education of their children nor feed them properly. Their living conditions are deplorable. The low wages are the main reason for discontent among the workers. While the price level has been increasing constantly at a higher rate, the increase in the rate of wages could not keep pace with it. This led to a situation where workers resorted to striking to raise their rate of wages. Since the cost of living is increasing, workers generally bargain for higher wages to meet the rising cost of living index and to increase their standard of living.
Dearness allowance and bonus– Due to the high rate of inflation and rise in the cost of living, demand is made for increasing the dearness allowance, as the high rate of inflation and the dearness allowance are co-related. The various trade unions in India have been demanding 100 per cent neutralisation of prices by a corresponding increase in the dearness allowance. Another important cause of industrial disputes in India is the demand for bonuses by the workers. This has resulted increased demand to share profits of the industrial units from workers and non-acceptance of this provision from employers. Though in many industries bonus is being paid now, the amount or percentage of bonus is a source of frequent disputes among workers and employers.
Demand for improved working conditions– Industrial disputes in India have also resulted from the demand for improved working conditions such as leave, fewer hours of work, better working conditions like better safety measures, canteen facilities etc. The working conditions in most of the countries are unhygienic and poor in respect of lighting and ventilation. These unhealthy conditions make workers discontented and lead to a strike.
Demand for reinstatement- At times, employers arbitrarily retrench many workers, and this is naturally resisted by the affected workers. Besides, other workers also feel insecure. Therefore, the workers resist such moves. They stand united and agitate for the reinstatement of the retrenched colleagues. Modernisation of Industries In modern industries, many new and sophisticated machines are installed. These machines are labour-saving and therefore result in the retrenchment of workers.
Managerial causes
The managerial causes include the wrongful treatment of workers by the management, unfair labour practices, defective recruitment and worker development policies of the management, non-recognition of the trade unions by the management, political causes, etc.
Non recognition of trade unions– Sometimes, trade unions are not recognised by employers, and it eventually becomes a source of contention between the employer and the employees. The employees may declare a strike to demand recognition of their trade union conflict, which may result in strikes, etc.·
Resistance to misconduct by officers– Today there is sufficient awakening among the workers, and they are very conscious of self-respect. Therefore, any slight insult by officers provokes them. Such incidents may sometimes ignite the fire of conflict and tension, which takes the form of gheraos, etc.·
Defective recruitment and worker development policies– Indian industries recruit labour through faulty systems, which creates many problems. Besides, partial treatment by management with regard to grooming, promotion or demotion of workers is also a cause of dissatisfaction among workers, leading the workers to resort to strike.·
Insufficient and defective leadership– The reason for some industrial disputes is also the lack of able leadership in both management and trade unions. Inefficient managerial leaders do not care for the problems of the workers. Due to a lack of competence on the part of the supervisors and managers, neither they attempt to improve the human and labour relations, nor do they try to develop mutual understanding between the workers and themselves.
Political causes
These days, various political parties in India fight with each other to gain the sympathy and support of workers, and for this reason, they go out of their way to support all types of distress and even foment discontent among them. All labour unions in India are connected with one or another political party, which uses workers for its own selfish motives.
Some important political strikes are organised by industrial workers in India. Some strikes have occurred owing to the agitations of political parties on questions like the reorganisation of states or the national language, etc.
Illegal Strikes
Section 24 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 provides that strikes which are in non-compliance with Section 22 and Section 23 are illegal.
A strike or a lockout shall be illegal if,
It is commenced or declared in contravention of Section 22 or Section 23; or
It is continued in contravention of an order made under subsection (3) of Section 10 of subsection (4-A) of Section 10-A.
Where a strike or lockout in pursuance of an industrial dispute has already commenced and is in existence all the time of the reference of the dispute to a board, an arbitrator, a Labour Court, Tribunal or National Tribunal, the continuance of such strike or lockout shall not be deemed to be illegal; provided that such strike or lockout was not at its commencement in contravention of the provision of this Act or the continuance thereof was not prohibited under subsection (3) of Section 10 of subsection (4-A) of 10-A.
A strike declared as the consequence of an illegal lockout shall not be deemed to be illegal.
Constitution stand on the legality of the strikes
Contrary to the international laws where the right to strike is generally considered as a fundamental human right; but here in India Right to Strike is not expressly recognised by the law, it is not an absolute right, exceeding this right comes with reasonable restrictions which are being imposed by the state.
Entry 29 in List III, (Concurrent List) of the VII schedule of the constitution of India, deals with the matter of trade unions, industrial and labour disputes; Entry 61 (concurrent list) deals in the matter of industrial disputes, concerning union employees, empowered the central as well as the provincial and presidency legislatures to legislate on the following matter.
According to the concurrent list, it specified that the trade Union, Industrial and Labour disputes related to entry 22; entry 23 deals with social security and social insurance, employment and unemployment and entry 24 deals with the welfare of labour, including the condition of work, provident funds, employers liability, workmen’s compensation etc. Thus, both the parliament and the legislature have the competence to legislate on this subject.
In Article 19(1) of the Indian constitution guarantees the protection of certain freedoms as a fundamental right. The constitution of India has specified that all citizens shall have the rights i.e, To freedom of speech and expression, To Assemble peaceably and without arms, To form associations or unions, To move freely throughout the territory of India, To reside and settle in any part of the territory of India, and to practise any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business. But the principle of the right of the strike is not expressly defined or recognized under the Indian constitution
In the case of ‘All India Bank Employees Association v. I. T.(1961)’,the Supreme Court held that “the right to strike or right to declare lockout may be controlled or restricted by appropriate industrial legislation and the validity of such legislation would have to be tested not regarding the criteria laid down in clause (4) of Article 19 but by totally different considerations.”
The Supreme Court concerning strikes has the same point of view that the right to strike is an important weapon in the armoury of employees as a mode of redress. It is a right earned by the employees as a form of direct action during their long struggle. It is a weapon to safeguard and preserve liberty. It is an inherent right of every employee. Being an essential right for every employee, the right to strike is an inherent legal strike, despite the fact it cannot be raised to the status of a fundamental right.
Both the Indian constitution and the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, are on common grounds, both of them think that the right to strike is a legal right and the sustainment of this right comes with reasonable restrictions. The significance of the right to strike is the core of significance to the principle of collective bargaining of each worker.
Hence, the constitution provides a guaranteed fundamental right to association and union under Article 19 of the Indian constitution but it doesn’t provide the fundamental right to go on strike.
To date, it remains a disputable topic whether the right to strike is a fundamental right or not. No clear view has been provided by courts on strikes. But one thing is clear and cut that the right to strike is a statutory implied right with certain restrictions.
Consequences of illegal strike
The following are the major consequences of an illegal strike-
Economic Consequences
Losses incurred by strikes are humungous and serious and, in some cases can even lead to the bankruptcy of the industry. The economic losses caused by the strike may be serious for the employer. During strikes, production stops, and sales go down, due to which rival companies use this opportunity to capture their market and the industry loses its consumers and their trust, strikes badly affect the market goodwill of the company.
Both parties i.e, employer and employee are at a loss; for employers the quick losses capital loss, loss of profits, the delaying of orders and loss of goodwill as well as the possible incurring of insurance or strike-breaking expenses while on the worker’s side, there is the loss of wages, the contracting of debts and all the personal hardships that may be involved.
The losses incurred by a strike are difficult to calculate economically. Strikes can have adverse effects leading to an unstable foreign investment in an economy. Furthermore, the negative effects on international trade include the hindrance of economic development and creating great economic uncertainty – especially as the global media continues to share details, images and videos of violence, damage to property and ferocious clashes between strikers and security.
Social Consequences
The social consequences of the strike are serious, and mostly affect the employees; as they are the ones who are losing their wages, they are at greater risk of losing their jobs. Loss of wages or loss of jobs will directly affect in curtailing their consumption and expenses and further strikes in essential utility services affect the tripod of any industry i.e., suppliers, manufacturers ( both employer and employees ) & customers.
A hostile attitude on the part of the employer towards their employees leads Dismissal of workmen
In Punjab National Bank v. Their Employees, the court observed that in the strike, the employer might bar the entry of the strikers within the premises by adopting the effective and legitimate method in that behalf. He may call upon employees to vacate, and, on their refusal to do so, take due steps to suspend them from employment, proceed to hold proper inquires according to the standing order and pass proper orders against them subject to the relevant provisions of the Act.
The effect of a strike is that the workmen cannot claim wages for the period during which an illegal strike continues. It is observed that if the strike is legal the workmen are entitled to wages. A strike is legal or illegal, justified or unjustified is the question of fact which is to be judged in the light of the fact which is to be judged in the light of the facts and circumstances of each case.
In Crompton Greaves Ltd. v. Workmen(1978), the Supreme Court observed that if a strike is legal as well as justified then, the worker is entitled to wages for the period of strike, the strike should be legal and justified. Whether a particular strike is justified or not is a question of fact, which has to be judged in the light of the facts and circumstances of each case. The use of force, coercion, violence or acts of sabotage resorted to by the workmen during the strike period which was legal and justified would disentitle them to wages for the strike period.
A strike is legitimate if it doesn’t disregard any arrangement of the provision. Again a strike can’t be said to be unjustified except if the purposes behind it are altogether unreasonable or irrational. It is likewise all around settled that the utilization of power or brutality or demonstrations of treachery turn by the labourers during a strike disentitles them to compensation for the strike time frame.
Legal consequences
The legitimateness of a strike may rely upon the article, or reason, of the strike, on its planning, or the direction of the strikers. The article, or items, of a strike and whether the articles are legitimate are matters that are not in every case simple to decide A strike, legal or illegal, justified or unjustified does not dissolve the employer-employee relationship.
Normally taking part in the illegal strike amounts to misconduct on the part of a workman for which they invite the punishment of dismissal. Whether the employer is free to punish dismissal from services in such cases has been subject to regular domestic enquiry to determine the quality of misconduct and quantum of punishment by finding out whether they were peaceful strikes or violent strikers. It is only after complying with these requirements, that a workman if found guilty of the charges may be dismissed.
The question of whether the workmen are entitled to strike pay or not is generally based on the dilemma of whether the strike is justified or not.
The Supreme Court in Bank of India v T.S. Kelawala(1990), “held that where the contract or standing orders or the service rules regulations are silent on the issue of workers entitlement to wages during the strike period, the management has the power to deduct wages for absence from duty when the absence is concerted action on the part of the employees and the absence is not disputed, irrespective of the fact whether the strike was legal or illegal. There is no statutory provision either in civil law or in industrial law prescribing payment of strike wages. Strike pay cannot, therefore, be claimed as a legal right.”
The consequences of industrial disputes are often far-reaching as they disturb the economic, social and political life of a nation. In strikes, besides the employer and employee, there is a third party involved, i.e., the public. The economic effects are first felt by the employer and then by the community at large, and in furtherance of their aims, workers also inflict economic hardships on themselves.
The following are the impacts of strikes:
Impact of strikes on workers
Sufferings of workers– The workers face many difficulties during strikes. During the strikes, not only workers but also their families suffer as they are not paid during the strike, which affects their physical and mental health.·
Loss of wages– The workers may not be paid during the strike period. Thus, workers and their families have to face financial difficulties due to such disputes. The workers and their family members also suffer health loss due to mental stress resulting from loss of wages. The loss of wages also increases the indebtedness among the workers. ·
Loss of job– The prolonged strikes by the workers sometimes lead to lock-out by the employer or closure of the industry due to industrial sickness. This results in the loss of jobs of the workers and increases unemployment and unrest among them.
Victimisation by the employers– Due to industrial disputes, a feeling of hostility develops between the employer and the employee, due to which the employer loses sympathy for the workers. As a result, the employer may deny certain welfare and other facilities to the workers once the strike is over. Injury to the workers sometimes leads to confrontation, which occurs between the security forces and the workers during the protest. Security forces use force like lathi charges, firing, etc. to suppress striking workers, which causes physical injuries and sometimes the death of workers.
Impact of strikes on the employer
Employer suffering– The employer suffers equally from workers during strikes as they face output loss, adverse effects on the quality of production, and damage to property. All this affects labour management relations.
Effect on output and quality of production– Strikes affect the productivity and profitability of the industrial unit. Loss of output not only affects the industry that is directly affected by the strike but also other industries that are dependent on the industries affected by strikes. The strike also affects the quality of production due to limited interest or non-cooperation from workers during the period of the strike.
Effect on the goodwill of the industry– The strikes affect the market reputation of the industry. Society loses faith in the industry. Hardworking, efficient and sincere workers would become reluctant to join an industry where strikes are really common. The rate of investment is also reduced due to strikes.
Bad effect on labour-management relations– Strikes affect labour-management relations as they can lead to the breakdown of communication between the employer and employees. The management’s attitude changes towards the workers, which causes tension between the employer and the employees, and this disturbs the smooth working of the industrial unit.
Damage to property– Sometimes strikes result in the destruction of the property of the employer, as the strikers may turn violent and destroy the property of the industry. The property may also get damaged due to the confrontation of the workers with the police, which causes loss to the employer. The employers also have to bear the additional expenditures for protecting the property.
Impact of strikes on society
Strikes not only affect the employer and employee, but society as a whole equally suffers from the effects of the strikes.
Impact on the economy– Industry and economy are interrelated and interdependent. Due to strikes, industrial production is decreased, exports suffer and this affects the entire national economy. Strikes lead to shortages of essential commodities, which cause an artificial price rise. Strikes not only harm the industry involved but also lead to all-round economic depression. The closure of one industry due to a strike leads to a reduction in demand for goods from other industries or trades. If the industry manufactures items that are used in the conduct of other industries while it is under work stoppage, it lessens the supply of raw materials for their production.
Hardships to consumers– Strikes and lockouts create problems for consumers. Owing to low production levels, items meeting their needs are not always readily available, and malpractices such as black marketing practices drive up the costs of these items.
Threat to social security and public peace– When tension and frustration among workers and employers take serious form, the workers are liable to become violent or indulge in sabotage. This may threaten public peace and safety and may compel the employer to seek the help of the police force. Effect on the Government Strikes lead to loss of revenues for the government. Lots of money and time are wasted in the settlement of industrial disputes. Maintaining law and order due to strikes also became difficult for the government. There is also the destruction of public property during strikes, for repairing which the government has to spend money.
The positive impact of strikes
Generally, strikes bring with them bad effects, but there are also certain impacts of strikes that play an important role in the immediate realisation of the demands of the workers and improving their condition of work.
Growth in worker unity– Strikes bring a sense of cooperation among workers, which results in the growth of worker unity. The suffering of workers is not only for their own rights but even for the rights of other workers. Thus, strikes develop a feeling of unity and the ethics to endure hardships for the rights of fellow workers.
Improvement in work conditions and wages– A strike increases the collective bargaining power of the workers, which compels employers to negotiate with them. The stoppage of work in the industries pressurises the employers, demanding them to increase the salaries of the workers and improve their working conditions.
Progress of labour unions– The success of the strikes increases the faith of workers in labour unions, which in turn increases the membership of unions, strengthens the bargaining power of the unions, and compels the employer to accept the legitimate demands of the unions.
Labour reforms– Strikes are most of the time effective in bringing about change in the working conditions of the workers. The disruption caused to an entire society by a general strike can bring down a government or persuade authorities to bring reforms in labour laws.
Common Reasons for Strike
Strikes generally occur in industries due to disputes between employees and employers, employees and employees or among employers and employers mostly due to the following issues:
Working hours
Working Conditions
Salary, Incentive etc
Time payment of wages
Reduction in salary/wages
Issue related Minimum wages
Leave/Holidays
Dissatisfaction with the company policy
PF, ESI, Profit Sharing etc
Retrenchment of workmen and closure of establishment
Any other issue.
Conclusion
It is observed that a strike is not a fundamental right in India and government employees have no right to go on strike. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 limits the rights of strikers and gives them the legal right to go on strikes as stipulated in Sections 22, 23 and 24, the right to strike under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is very much limited and regulated.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What are industrial disputes?
The disputes or conflicts that arise between employers and employers, between employers and workmen or between workmen is termed industrial disputes when they are regarding the employment or such terms of employment or regarding the conditions of the employment of the employed.
Who raises industrial disputes?
The industrial dispute can be directly raised before a conciliation officer by a workman when it is regarding any form of termination of service, such as discharge, retrenchment or dismissal. And for other disputes, such as wages, rules of discipline, working hours or leave policy, etc, it is the union or the management that raises an industrial dispute.
What is a lockout?
Whenever there is a stoppage of work or denial of employment and it is initiated by the management of the company when any labour dispute arises, it is known as a lockout.
It is basically a temporary closing of the employment facility or suspension of work.
Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:
This article is written by Nishka Kamath. This article mainly focuses on the concept of collective bargaining from an academic point of view. It includes all the details regarding the right to collective bargaining, the origin of collective bargaining, the main objectives and goals of collective bargaining, the process of collective bargaining, the essential features of collective bargaining, the steps of collective bargaining, and the advantages and disadvantages of collective bargaining, inter alia. It also talks about different levels of collective bargaining and how this process is different from other modes of settling industrial disputes. Further, at the very end, some FAQs and MCQs on the process of collective bargaining are discussed; a student may expect them in their exams, that if the exam follows such a pattern.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Before we start to read about the nitty-gritty of collective bargaining as a process, let us have a look at this short story, which will help us understand the concept of collective bargaining in a better manner.
Once upon a time, in a bustling industrial town called Quahog, there stood a brewery company named Pawtucket Brewery. This brewery served the best beverages in town and was quite famous both inside and outside the city of Quahog. It provided employment opportunities to several workers who worked day and night to keep the brewery running in the best possible shape. However, the workers and employees in the brewery always felt overworked and underappreciated. Long working hours and no growth or increment in salaries and wage rates had eroded their job satisfaction. On the other hand, the management and the employers of Pawtucket Brewery were hogging away a huge amount of profit.
Agitated by all this, one fine day, Peter Griffin and Lois Griffin, old employees of the brewery, decided that it was time for a change in the situation. They started gathering their coworkers and together formed a union, which they named “The Clamion”. The main object of this union was to engage in collective bargaining with the authorities in managerial positions to address concerns related to both- the employees and the company. After numerous rounds of discussions and negotiations, both sides reached a historic agreement. After the agreement was signed, there was a noticeable improvement in:
Working conditions,
Wage rates,
Salaries and increments,
Job security,
Increased productivity,
Open communication, etc.
Over time, the brewery’s profits only soared higher and higher. The city of Quahog witnessed a whole new level of employee morale, profits, and productivity, along with a harmonious relationship between the employees and employers (or management), all thanks to Peter Griffin and Lois Griffin, who finally decided to voice their opinions against the atrocities and unjust treatment.
To sum it all up, the process of collective bargaining not only helped the employees work in better working conditions, but also helped the company reach new heights for, the employees were more happy, motivated, loyal, and had all the skills and zeal to work for the betterment of the brewery. Pawtucket Brewery became one of the shining examples of how cooperation and compromise can lead to prosperity in the world of labour and industry.
Now that we know how fruitful the process of collective bargaining can be, let us have a look at what exactly this process is and the minute details of it from an academic point of view.
What is collective bargaining
Collective bargaining is one of the methods of negotiation between two parties, the employees and the employers. The main aim of such a process is to reach an inference and an agreement eventually that would help regulate working conditions at the workplace. In simple words, collective bargaining can be defined as a process where all the workers (or employees) of a company or an organisation try to ensure their terms and conditions of employment are met through negotiations.
The right to collective bargaining
The right to collective bargaining can be regarded as one of the basic rights of workers in India. It is governed by the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. This Act gives the workers the right to form trade unions and engage in activities like collective bargaining with their employers. The Act also has provisions for registering trade unions that allow them to represent the collective interests of all their members in negotiations with employers. Generally, in India, collective bargaining involves negotiations over the following topics:
Wages,
Number of working hours,
The working conditions, among other matters related to employment.
The process of collective bargaining is usually initiated by trade unions that represent the workers, the employer, or its representatives. If the negotiators of trade unions do not succeed in producing an agreement, either party has the right to refer the matter to a conciliation officer; such an officer will be appointed by the government. Further, if the conciliation does not succeed, then the dispute can be referred to a labour court or an industrial tribunal for adjudication.
Example of collective bargaining
In 2021, there was a company named Hippo Factories International Ltd., wherein the employees made an attempt to negotiate a favourable contract with the agricultural equipment manufacturer. However, during the period of high profits for Hippo Factories International Ltd. and higher labour demand during the COVID-19 pandemic, many workers were of the notion that they deserved a higher amount of wages and retirement benefits in comparison to what the company first offered.
Considering the above belief, workers at Hippo Factories International Ltd. rejected the first tentative proposal and authorised strike action against the company. One fine day, the workers started picketing the company and its headquarters, thus causing some companies to bring in profit from the harvest that year. After tremendous pressure from politicians, workers, and the public, Hippo Factories International Ltd. came up with a new contract that was in accordance with the worker’s demands. The strike finally ended after a whopping one month.
Origin of collective bargaining
The term “collective bargaining”was probably first used in 1891 by Sydney Webb, an economic theorist, and Beatrice Webb (in their celebrated treatise on the History of Trade Unions). This movement started in Great Britain and traces of its usage were found as early as 1874 among coal miners.
Further, the process of collective negotiations and agreements between employers and their workers has existed since the rise of the 19th century, when workers started raising their voice for their employment rights at the workplace. Further, many skilled labourers started using their skills and expertise as a way to convince their employers to fulfil their workplace needs and demands, whereas, other workers depended on nothing but sheer numbers, creating general strikes to raise their voices against deteriorating working conditions. Also, various labour pioneers began to set up a collective bargaining system for negotiations to run in a smooth and efficient manner.
Generally, the employees are represented by a union. The initial step since the advent of collective bargaining is actually joining a union, giving consent to obey and accept the rules set forth by that union, and electing some union representatives to solve grievances that may occur during the course of employment. In other words, skilled individuals from the union help the employees in drafting a contract, thus enabling them to present their grievances and recommendations to the employer. Further, before the parties reach an inference, multiple meetings between the representatives of the employer and his employees are carried out. Such meetings usually continue until the parties jointly agree to the terms of the contract. Meanwhile, as the contract is being negotiated, the employees also have input on it via their union officers; accordingly, the agreement reflects the combined desires of all the employees, along with limitations that the employer wishes to put in place. All this results in a powerful document, which usually reflects cooperative effort.
Yet, in some instances, the union of the employer may turn to using unpleasant tactics like that of going on strike, declaring a lock-out or the like so that the agreement can be pushed through.
For employees, workers, and labourers, the method of collective bargaining is an excellent tool for effective negotiation. Many organisations and companies benefit from unionisation, which in turn helps workers raise their voices together and assert their rights unitedly. Also, the employers benefit from this process, as such a process helps in establishing a clear list of expectations from both parties.
Furthermore, such an experience (that of collective bargaining) can also work as a learning experience for both parties, as it helps the employees and the employers understand each other’s point of view and thus consider each other’s positions.
Introduction of collective bargaining in India
Since the process of industrialization began considerably late in India, the history of collective bargaining as a negotiation process is not very big in comparison to developed countries like Great Britain or the USA. Collective bargaining became popular in India only after independence, however, it started years ago (around the 1920s) in the textile mills of Ahmedabad and was initiated by one of the most known leaders across the globe – Mahatma Gandhi. The significance of such a process surfaced when the union realised that settling disputes through industrial courts was not so fruitful in terms of time, energy, and capital and also posed a hindrance to industrial peace and harmony.
The concept of a collective bargaining agreement was first introduced by the Dunlop Rubber Company in West Bengal in 1947. Then came the Bata Shoe Company in West Bengal. Later, in 1951, the Indian Aluminium Company made its five year agreement with the employees union in Belur. Later, the Imperial Tobacco Company adopted this concept in 1952, and by 1955, several well-known companies like Tata Iron and Steel Company, Hindustan Lever, and many small companies too had started with this concept of collective bargaining. Before the beginning of 1962, around 49 companies, involving around 4.5 lakh employees, started the practice of collective bargaining as a tool for maintaining peace and harmony in industrial organisations and to resolve industrial disputes.
From the aforementioned history of the process of collective bargaining in India, we can safely infer that collective bargaining in its true sense was only practised in the private sector, and there was no real attempt to implement the same in the public sector except in the case of the Indian Railways. Later, in 1978, Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited experimented with bringing workers’ representatives into play.
Moreover, there has been very little legal support for this process. Even after India became independent, no explicit laws were enacted for this process. To date, there is no law that specifically mentions or promotes the use of collective bargaining as a tool for maintaining peace and harmony in industrial relations and to resolve industrial disputes.
Interesting fact : Convention No. 98 of the ILO (International Labor Organisation) gives major importance to the rights of collective bargaining.
Introduction of collective bargaining in courts of India
Collective bargaining, as a process, was introduced in the courts by the Supreme Court in the landmark case of Karnal Leather Karamchari Sanghatan v. Liberty Footwear Company (Regd.) and Ors. (1990). In this case, the Apex Court held that the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, was laid down for the purpose of securing social justice by means of collective bargaining.
Definition of collective bargaining
There are various definitions given by various organisations and scholars, some of which are as follows:
According to Dale Yoder, “Collective bargaining is the term used to describe a situation in which the essential conditions of employment are determined by the bargaining process undertaken by representatives of a group of workers on the one hand and of one or more employers on the other.”
In the words of Flippo, “Collective bargaining is a process in which the representatives of a labour organisation and the representatives of business organisation meet and attempt to negotiate a contract or agreement, which specifies the nature of employee-employer-union relationship.”
The I.L.O. defines collective bargaining as “the negotiations about working conditions and terms of employment between an employer, or a group of employers, or one or more employers’ organisations, on the one hand, and one or more representative workers’ organisation on the other with a view to reaching agreement.“
“All negotiations which take place between an employer, a group of employers or one or more employers’ organisations, on the one hand, and one or more workers’ organisations, on the other, for:
(a) determining working conditions and terms of employment; and/or
(b) regulating relations between employers and workers; and/or
(c) regulating relations between employers or their organisations and a workers’ organisation or workers’ organisations.”
Similarly, according to Ludwing and Teller, collective bargaining is “an agreement between a single employer or an association of employers on the one hand and labour union on the other hand which regulates terms and conditions of employment.”
The Webbs describe collective bargaining as an economic institution, with trade unionism acting as a labour cartel by controlling entry into the trade.
Further, Prof. Allan Flanders claims that “collective bargaining is primarily a political rather than an economic process.”
Furthermore, Perlman aptly stated, “Collective bargaining is not just a means of raising wages and improving conditions of employment. Nor is it merely democratic government in industry. It is above all technique, collective bargaining as a technique of the rise of a new class is quite different … from the desire to displace or abolish” the “old ruling class”…to gain equal rights as a class … to acquire an excessive jurisdiction in that sphere where the most immediate interests, both material and spiritual, are determined, and a shared jurisdiction with the older class or classes in all other spheres.“
Moreover, the Supreme Court, in the case of Karol Leather Karamchari Sangathan v. Liberty Footwear Company, (1989), defined the process of collective bargaining as“the technique by which dispute as to conditions of employment is resolved amicably by agreement rather than coercion”.
Main objectives of collective bargaining
The main objectives of the process of collective bargaining for both parties are as follows:
For the employees
The main object of the process of collective bargaining for the employees is their representation.
For the employer
The main object of the process of collective bargaining for the employers is to reach an agreement on the terms of employment. This agreement is referred to as a collective bargaining agreement or contract that includes the conditions of employment and the terms that benefit both parties involved.
Goal of collective bargaining
The main goal of collective bargaining is to get into a collective bargaining agreement. This collective bargaining agreement is meant to set some rules and provisions of employment for a set time period (usually, the time period is in years). Further, the cost of such a representation is incurred by the Union members in the form of union dues. Also, it must be noted that if the parties have trouble reaching an inference, there could be the involvement of antagonistic labour strikes or employee lockouts.
Process of collective bargaining
As you must be aware, the International Labour Organisation (ILO) states the process of collective bargaining to be a fundamental right available to all workers of any organisation, meaning all the employees working in a company are entitled to submit their grievances to their employers and to be able to negotiate for such grievances. Further, as per the ILO, the process of collective bargaining helps reduce inequalities in the workplace while providing workers with labour protection.
Generally, collective bargaining occurs between members of a company and labour union leaders. Usually, these union leaders are elected by workers to present their grievances and to represent them and their interests. The process of collective bargaining is involved when an employee’s contracts are to be renewed or when employers make any modifications to the workplace or any terms of the contract. These modifications include, but are not limited to:
Employment conditions,
Conditions of work,
Rules related to workplace,
Matters related to base pay, wages, and overtime pay,
Holidays, sick days and vacations,
Benefits related to issues like that of retirement and health care.
The aforementioned issues fall into three categories, let us have a look at each of them in brief:
Categories of issues under collective bargaining
There could be several issues arriving at the workplace that can be resolved through the process of collective bargaining. Mentioned below are some of the issues:
Mandatory subjects
Mandatory subjects include:
Salary,
Overtime, and
Workplace safety.
Voluntary subjects
Voluntary subjects include issues that can be negotiated, like-
Union issues, and
Decisions regarding employer board members.
Illegal subjects
Illegal subjects include anything that is a violation of law, like
Discrimination at the workplace.
Top ten essential features of collective bargaining
A pro tip to remember these features is to use the sentence –
“Please Issue Summons Coz Cesare who is BalDFlipped Ice in ColumBia on a CAt”.
The top ten essential ingredients of the process of collective bargaining are as follows:
Parties to the negotiation
Intention to reach an agreement
Subject matter of collective bargaining
Collective nature of the negotiation process
Continuous nature of the negotiation process
Bipartite nature of the negotiation process
Discipline
Flexibility
Implementation
Collective bargaining and collective agreements are different
Let us take a look at each of these features in detail.
Parties to the negotiation
The negotiations that go around in the process of collective bargaining involve two parties, namely:
Employers
This party may either have the involvement of employers, a group of employers, or an organisation of employers.
Employees
This party may either have the involvement of employees, a group of employees, or one or more employee unions or organisations.
Intention to reach an agreement
One of the most fundamental features of the process of negotiations and discussions involved in the process of collective bargaining is the serious intent of both parties to reach an agreement; however, this, in no way means that in every case the parties reach an agreement. But it does imply that a negotiation and discussion were carried out between the two parties with the aim of reaching an agreement, irrespective of the fact whether the parties were ultimately able to arrive at an agreement or not.
Subject matter of collective bargaining
Even though, usually, the process of collective bargaining concerns itself with the terms and conditions of employment like daily wages, number of working hours, grievance procedures, etc., in some cases it may also have an involvement in issues related to:
Recognition or non-recognition of a particular union,
Arbitration or conciliation procedures to settle differences between the employer(s) and the employee(s),
Limitations imposed on workers by setting up a joint commission, and other such similar issues.
Collective nature of the negotiation process
As the name suggests, the procedure of collective bargaining is a collective process. It does not have any sort of involvement in the interactions between employer(s) and employee(s) on a one-to-one basis, instead, it is a process in which the representatives of either side of the parties meet up to reach an agreement that is mutually accepted by all of them.
Continuous nature of the negotiation process
Collective bargaining is a continuous process that aims at building a stable relationship between the employer(s) and the employee(s). It is not a process that works in fits and starts. Further, even if the agreement between the parties is signed on a periodic basis (say for instance, once in a year or once in every two years depending on the company’s policy) the cords underlying collective bargaining make themselves visible on a perpetual basis.
Bipartite nature of the negotiation process
Generally, as you must have noticed, the process of collective bargaining is a bipartite process between the employer(s) on one side and the employee(s) on the other. Yet, in some nations, the State plays a vital role in helping the parties reach a settlement, perhaps an agreement. The role of the State becomes more apparent in instances where the parties are not successful in reaching an agreement, and in case if it does, the agreement would possibly contradict any policy set forth by the government of that particular state.
Discipline
The process of collective bargaining intends to achieve discipline in the industry. Initially, such discipline may first be witnessed only in one factory or a group of factories, but ultimately, the discipline spreads throughout the whole industry.
Flexibility
Flexibility is one of the most important ingredients, and without it, it is nearly impossible for collective bargaining to function efficiently. It is significant that both parties adopt a flexible approach to reaching a settlement. If either of the parties or both parties are stubborn and stick firmly to their demands and refuse to revise them, collective bargaining can’t succeed, no matter what. Willingness to make some adjustments on both sides is the secret of a successful collective bargaining process.
Implementation
Obviously, the process of collective bargaining, the negotiations, and the discussions carried on to reach a settlement are not only to arrive at an agreement, but also to enforce and execute the agreement, thence. If either of the parties to the agreement is not serious about enacting the duties enforced in the agreement, the situation will be like a person entering into a solemn contract with the aim of breaching it ultimately. In such cases, unpleasant litigation would be the only consequence.
Collective bargaining and collective agreements are different
Although the terms “collective bargaining” and “collective agreements” are at times used interchangeably, there is quite a difference between these phrases. While collective bargaining refers to the process or means, a collective agreement is the effect of the process of a successful collective bargaining. Needless to say, the process of collective bargaining will not always result in having a collective agreement to be reached at.
Essential conditions for a successful collective bargaining
In order for the process of collective bargaining to work efficiently, the following conditions need to be fulfilled:
Favourable political climate
The process of collective bargaining will work effectively only when there is a political climate wherein both the parties, i.e., the government and the public are of the belief that this process is the best way to resolve grievances and that they are genuinely convinced that this process is the best method of settling industrial disputes.
Freedom of association
The process of collective collective bargaining became popular only after workers, labourers and employees started to realise that individual bargaining was futile. The freedom to form a union and to represent themselves as trade unions is an essential precondition of a successful collective bargaining. If such freedoms are not guaranteed to the employees and employers, the chances of collective bargaining to succeed are that of zero to none.
Stability of workers’ organisations
At times, the freedom and opportunity given to workers to form their own trade unions are not enough; thus, for successful collective bargaining, it is crucial that the workers of the organisation form strong and stable trade unions. In case there is an absence of such a union, it is highly unlikely that their issues will be resolved; thus, the management has more power in its hands.
Willingness to give and take
Like any other type of bargaining, collective bargaining, too, is a process of mutual benefit and is advantageous to both parties. It will only be successful if there is an attitude of willingness and compromise on the part of both parties. If one of the parties only wants to “take” and does not want to “give”, in such circumstances, collective bargaining as a process cannot be efficient or fruitful.
Absence of any unfair, unhealthy or unfair practises
As mentioned above, both parties have to have an attitude of fair play and “give and take” for collective bargaining to succeed. It can only have a positive outcome if the process is based on mutual respect and both parties consider the position of the other instead of being stubborn about their needs and wants being fulfilled. If any of the parties resort to unfair or unhealthy means like delay in submitting work or victimisation of trade union leaders on the part of the employer, we can’t expect the process of collective bargaining to succeed. Additionally, if the employer resorts to a lockout or the workers announce a strike as a result of violating an existing contract that took place between the parties, the concept of collective bargaining suffers in the process.
Principles followed by parties to resolve industrial disputes via collective bargaining
Management or employers be updated with labour codes
In order to carry out effective collective bargaining, it is crucial for the management or employer to be updated with all the labour laws. Further, it is important that the management offer unions unconditional recognition and consider the employees’ grievances as a constructive and cooperative force in the organisation, as doing so will in turn boost the employer’s prestige and responsibilities and make the employees feel heard. Moreover, it is important that the management or the employers build a strong relationship with the unions in order to restrict them from taking any drastic measures (like strikes) that would cause harm to the industry or their relations. Additionally, they (employers or management) must maintain a cordial relation with the unions and try to gain their trust. Also, employers and management must maintain a satisfactory relationship with the employees.
In order to maintain a healthy relation between the union and the employers (or management) during the process of collective bargaining, the management or employers have to take into account the point of view of the other side, too, and not only consider one’s own point of view or economic consideration. The management or employers of the organisation have to understand and must have the willing acceptance to recognise representatives for collective bargaining and should establish equal employment opportunities with an aim to stay away from industrial disputes and maintain peace and harmony in the industry.
Trade unions and employees should be considerate
In order for the process of collective bargaining to be successful, it is important that trade unions also understand the economic situation of the employers and must ensure that their demands are in alignment with the resources and financial health of the company and that the company does not feel discouraged. Further, it is the responsibility, obligation, or duty of every trade union to assist management in reducing waste and expenditures that are quite not necessary. The trade unions should act as a medium to boost productivity and quality of the workplace, like working conditions, and to improve them, they should employ individuals to carry on the collective bargaining process. Further, the union should not limit the process to just economic gains, but rather understand that this process is not a competition. The needs of one party are the resources of the other party, and thus, the process should be regarded as a two way settlement process.
Different levels of collective bargaining
It is quite common for disputes to arise in a company, be it at a higher or lower level, be it a craft level dispute or a national level dispute. The collective bargaining levels keep changing from region to region, from union to union, and from one company to another, amongst other factors. When the disputes are classified according to the levels, it becomes easy for everyone to get to the solution of the dispute and determine the behaviour of the industry, thus helping the parties reach a settlement quickly. The four main levels of collective bargaining are as follows:
National-level bargaining
National-level bargaining generally occurs between management and the national-level union. The major advantage of this level of bargaining is that all the industries acknowledge the issues and consider all the industrial employees when the process of negotiation begins. This definitely leads to several benefits, like-
Salaries and/or wage rates are uniform,
No disputes, disparities, etc.
Industry-level bargaining
In industry-level bargaining, trade unions are structured as industry federations. In this level of negotiation, the following subjects are covered:
Basic, standard pay,
Allowances,
Production capacity,
Production rules, and
Working conditions related to that industry.
Bargaining at an industry level ensures there is homogeneity in labour costs and working conditions. However, if we see, every organisation or company has different levels of performance, usage and access to technology, productivity, etc., this has made industry-level bargaining not so successful.
Corporate-level bargaining
When the management of a multi-plant company carries out negotiations and discussions over a single agreement with multiple unions representing different factories of the same organisation, it is referred to as corporate-level bargaining. Such negotiations are frequently conducted by corporate management. The advantages of corporate-level management are-
Ensures there is consistency and uniformity across all the factories and offices the company or organisation holds.
Since there is uniformity, there is no chance of conflict that takes place due to differences in pay scale across locations.
When collective bargaining takes place at the corporate-level, with its multi-plant structure, it becomes easy to bypass apprehensions that are integral at the plant level.
Additionally, when such a level of bargaining is practised for huge public sector organisations like HMT, ONGC, or BHEL, the ability of the employers and management to bargain, especially in India, is limited considering the political involvement. The Ministry of Public Enterprises (MoPE) and the Bureau of Public Enterprises (BPE) both have set instructions and guidelines.
Plant-level bargaining
In India, the majority of private sector organisations engage in plant-level collective bargaining. This type of bargaining takes place between the management of a certain plant or industrial site. The issues and grievances are quite specific to a particular facility or firm. Matters that involve discussions on performance-related or pay productivity-related are the foundation of such agreements. An advantage of such a level of bargaining is that it allows for separate discussions. Here, matters like differences in the cost of living from one location to the next, providing a realistic negotiating ground, can be discussed separately.
Collective bargaining steps
The process of collective bargaining can be intense and may also cause a bit of stress and complication for all the parties involved. This process often involves a lot of discussion, repetitive offers, and counteroffers, with the main motive of reaching an agreement. However, this process involves a lot of steps, and they are as follows:
Identifying the issues and making preparations of the demands
The first step includes determining the issue and preparing for the demands of the employees. This may include a list of grievances like abusive management practices or low wages or salaries.
Forming a union
Forming a trade union to carry out discussions and negotiations is yet another crucial step for carrying out the process of collective bargaining.
Charter of demands
At this point, one of the parties (either the union or the company) initiates the process of collective bargaining. After this, the labour union notes down a charter of demands through a series of meetings with all its members.
Negotiation
Usually, for this step, the trade union appoints a team of professional negotiators to help employees reach an agreement with the employer. Similarly, the employer, too, appoints a negotiator, and the two parties would continue to meet and have discussions until they reached an inference and entered into a satisfactory agreement.
Strikes or lockouts
In case the negotiations fail, the union has the right to call a strike. Under Section 22 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, employees have to give a six weeks’ notice before calling out a strike.
Further, under Section 22, no employer carrying on any public utility service shall lockout any employee without giving notice period of six weeks before locking out.
Conciliation
When the conciliation officer is informed about the strike via a notice, the process of conciliation begins. This process allows the parties to choose between two options, namely-
State government may appoint a board
Under Section 4 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the state government may appoint a conciliation officer to carry out the following duties:
Investigate the matter,
Mediate between the parties,
Encourage settlement during the cooling off period.
State government may form a Board
Here, under Section 5 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the state government can form a Board of Conciliation, that would consist of:
Chairperson,
Two or four members.
As per Section 22 and Section 23 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, strikes are not allowed during the period of conciliation.
Submitting a tentative agreement
Once the parties reach an agreement, both parties to the negotiation process have to submit an agreement to their constituents. During this period, last-minute issues will also be brought into consideration as the minute details are hammered out.
Accepting and ratifying the agreement
After the aforementioned step, the agreement will be submitted to union members, who will then have the chance to vote either in favour of or against the new proposed contract.
Administration of the agreement
Even after the agreement is made final, workers and shop stewards continue monitoring the process in order to make sure the company is adhering to all the obligations stated in the agreement.
A point must be taken into consideration that there are several instances where it becomes difficult for the parties involved to reach an agreement. So, if the negotiation period expires without the process of collective bargaining being completed or the agreement is not reached at, in such cases, union representatives may advise that workers go on a strike until their demands are met. Also, employers may also consider locking out their employees until they reach a suitable agreement; however, in case the employees are locked out, they have the right to picket. These measures are drastic and should be used only as a last resort.
Laws related to collective bargaining : an Indian perspective
The process of collective bargaining in India is controlled by a set of complex rules and regulations. These laws protect the rights of the employees of an organisation and act as a framework of guidelines for employers. The key laws and regulations related to collective bargaining in India include:
The Trade Unions Act, 1926
The Trade Unions Act, 1926, has provisions for the protection of trade unions. It also has a set framework for rights and responsibilities and some rules that are to be followed by a trade union. The rights of members are discussed in detail, and these rights also include the right to participate in the process of collective bargaining. Furthermore, it also discusses the procedure for registration of a trade union.
The Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946
The way workers are intimated about work and wage-related details, etc.
Further, under Section 3 of this Act, employers are obliged to submit the draft of standing order to the Certififying Officer and must also confirm to the model set for the standing order. After this, the Officer will forward the draft to trade unions or workers. If there is no trade union involved to raise any objections, the officer has to provide a just and fair opportunity to both the parties to address their concerns and then certify the standing order with essential amends and then share the copies with both the parties, thus acting as a negotiator.
The Industrial Dispute Act, 1947
This law mainly specifies the legal terms and conditions for settling industrial disputes and also has provisions relating to the formation and registration of trade unions. This Act also has provisions relating to:
The appointment of conciliation officers,
Boards, and
Courts
to enable the resolution of disputes between the employees and the employers.
The Constitution of India
There are several provisions enshrined under the Constitution of India, especially the Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policies that talk about the concept of collective bargaining. The most important, Article 19(1)(c) of the Constitution, permits every Indian citizen to form an association, which apparently covers the rights to form trade unions, too. In accordance with Article 43A, the state is authorised to enact and implement laws that encourage workers to take part in management.
Other laws
Besides the aforementioned laws, there are some relevant laws that have an impact on the process of collective bargaining, namely:
These laws establish minimum wage standards, provide for the payment of bonuses, and establish workplace safety standards, respectively.
Collective bargaining and the Industrial Relation Code, 2020
The main notion behind implementing labour laws is to prevent the unequal negotiation partners that arrive from class connection between employers and employees. Justice Dinsha Pirosha Madon, in the case of Central Inland Water Transportation Corporation v. Brojo Nath (1986), stated that trade unions play a major role through collective bargaining in unequal relationships where workers are under a constant risk of unemployment especially when employers are large corporations.
As stated in the Industrial Relations Code, an employer cannot be prejudicial between a fixed term employee and permanent employees, thus, the fixed-term employees working hours, salary, allowances, and other such perks and benefits cannot be less than those of permanent workers that carry on the same or alike work. Having said that, even the progress of permanent workers will be ascertained on an individual basis just like that of fixed-term employees.
In effect, the role of trade unions in discerning the wage rate and service conditions via collective bargaining will be eliminated.
Laws related to collective bargaining : a global perspective
Generally, most of the industrialised countries across the globe have laws incorporated to protect the rights of employees and employers and have provisions that enable them to engage in the process of collective bargaining and form unions, even though there may be limitations on certain industries.
United States
In the United States, the rights of most workers are safeguarded by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). It also has provisions that enable the workers to engage in collective bargaining activities. The activities include:
The right to form and join unions,
The right to discuss fair pay,
The right to address grievances,
The right to strike,
The right to not be fired (for some activities).
Please note, some of the categories of employees, like federal, state, and local government employees and agricultural labourers, are excluded from the list of those protected under the NLRA.
There is a government body named the National Labour Relations Board (NLRB) that looks after labour practises and collective bargaining under the NLRA. This Board is also responsible for governing union elections and ensuring that workers are not pressured to vote one way or the other.
State wise provisions in the United States
In the United States, many states have their own set of laws regarding collective bargaining. Say, for instance, in 2022, during the midterm elections, Illinois voters gave their approval for an amendment that would enshrine collective bargaining rights in their state’s Constitution.
Moving in the opposite direction, Tennessee voters approved a referendum that would add a right-to-work law provision to their state Constitution, thus, restricting the power of unions.
In China, under China’s Labour Contract Law, the employer and the employees have the permission to enter into a “collective contract”. This contract has provisions on matters relating to:
Remuneration,
Work hours,
Social security, amongst other things.
In such circumstances, trade unions can negotiate the contract with the employer on behalf of the employees.
Saudi Arabia
There is no single trade union law in Saudi Arabia for industrial dispute resolution. The laws there do not authorise anyone to have such set rules and regulations.
Different types of collective bargaining
There are different methods involved in the process of collective bargaining, some of which are as follows:
Composite bargaining
Composite bargaining does not have anything to do with remuneration; instead, it mainly has its focus on the following issues:
Working conditions,
Job security,
Well-being of the employees of the company and
Other corporate policies.
The policies may include appointing and dismissing employees of the company as well as maintaining discipline at the workplace. The main object of composite bargaining is to reach a suitable agreement that would cause a lasting and harmonious relationship between the employees and employers.
Concessionary bargaining
As the name suggests, this type of concessionary bargaining has its focus on union leaders making concessions in the trade of security at the workplace. This method is quite common and is used especially during a company’s financial downturn or recession. At times, union leaders might agree to sacrifice some benefits to ensure the survival of the employees and, ultimately, the business.
Distributive bargaining
Distributive bargaining is referred to as the process of benefiting one party financially at the expense of the other party. This can be in the form of:
Bonus,
Raise in salaries, or
Other such financial benefits.
Please note: Distributive bargaining favours employees more than that of employers.
Further, unions have to have a higher degree of power in order for the process of distributive bargaining to work efficiently. Higher membership means more power, so, if an employer is not willing to agree to a union’s demands, it has the authority to call for a strike.
Integrative bargaining
In this type of collective bargaining, each party tries to benefit itself through integrative bargaining. This is the reason integrative bargaining is oftentimes considered to be a form of win-win bargaining. Under this method, both parties make an attempt to take into consideration the position of each party and address issues and provide solutions to such issues in a manner that is beneficial to both parties. In this way, both the employees and employers stand a chance to gain and lose at the same time, thus playing a fair game.
Productivity bargaining
Productive bargaining is yet another type of collective bargaining that involves compensation and the productivity of employees of a corporation. In this method of collective bargaining, the labour union leaders often use higher salaries and compensation as a means to boost employee’s productivity, thus causing higher profits and value for the employer. In order to make productivity bargaining work, it is important that both parties are in agreement with the financial terms, thus boosting productivity.
Interesting fact : Unions represent different types of workers, including employees or workers of a grocery store, airline company, professional athletes, teachers and professors, autoworkers, postal workers, actors, farmworkers, daily-wages workers, amongst other employees.
How is collective bargaining different from other modes
As discussed in the aforementioned passages, collective bargaining is the process of eventually negotiating and settling industrial disputes through discussions that lead to a mutual agreement between the employer(s) and his employee(s). Nevertheless, a point must be noted that it is one of the different forms of settling industrial disputes and disagreements. The other methods include settling industrial disputes via conciliation or by arbitration, which could either be compulsory or voluntary.
During the process of collective bargaining, there are voluntary meetings of the parties are held without the interference of a medium or a third party. Whereas, in conciliation, a conciliator often uses his good offices to bring about a mutual understanding between the parties. This is one of the basic differences between the aforementioned forms of dispute settlement.
Further, in some cases, there might be a situation where the parties do not reach an agreement and then decide to refer the issue to an arbitrator to resolve the issue. In arbitration, no matter if it is voluntary or compulsory, the dispute is referred to a third party (known as the arbitrator). Here, the decision taken by the arbitrator will stand final and is binding on the parties. The outcome of such a process is often a win-lose situation and could also be displeasing and even improper to one of the parties to the dispute. Furthermore, there are some instances where both the parties were not happy with the outcome of the process of arbitration. At times, it becomes mandatory for the parties to refer a particular type of dispute to an arbitration officer for a tribunal) as stated in the law. This is known as compulsory arbitration or adjudication and has the same shortcomings one would find in voluntary arbitration.
Further, some laws have a separate provision that states that parties to industrial disputes have to first go through the process of collective bargaining; it is as per the government’s discretion to decide whether the parties underwent this process in a sincere manner or not. The government will also consider other aspects, like:
Whether the parties have tried to avail themselves of themselves of all the potentialities to get to a solution, perhaps, a settlement or an agreement: and
Whether they have exhausted all the benefits of collective bargaining as a process.
If the government is of the opinion that the parties did not consider the aforementioned points, it has the authority to then refer the matter for compulsory arbitration or adjudication. Such a method has been quite fruitful for years now and has also played a major role in preventing strikes and lockouts in case the parties do not reach an agreement by following the process of collective bargaining.
Collective bargaining agreement
When both the parties agree to the terms and conditions of each other, a collective bargaining agreement is entered upon between the employer and the workmen (represented by trade unions) or the employees themselves. This could be in the form of by bipartite agreement, memorandum of settlement or consent of award. Let us take a look at each of these in detail.
Types of collective bargaining agreement
Bipartite (or voluntary) agreements
Such agreements are brought out after the employer and trade unions have voluntarily carried out negotiations and reached a settlement. According to Section 18 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, such an agreement is binding on both the parties. Further, the implementation of such an agreement is usually not that hard considering both parties have agreed to such a settlement voluntarily.
Memorandum of settlements
Settlements are tripartite in nature as there is an involvement of employer, trade union and conciliation officer in settling such an agreement. Such agreements stem from a particular dispute which is then addressed to an officer for the purpose of recognition. During the reconciliation process the officer has an instinct that the parties have indeed decided to reconcile and leave the dispute behind, and that an agreement is possible, he may withdraw himself. Further, if and when the parties finalise such an agreement after the officer has withdrawn, the acceptance of both the parties to the agreement is reported back to the officer within a stipulated time period and the matter is thus settled. A point should be noted that such an agreement has quite a limited scope in comparison to bipartite agreements as tripartite agreements are only restricted to specific issues that are referred to the conciliation officer.
Consent awards
Consents awards are those agreements that are reached at when there is an ongoing dispute pending before a compulsory adjudicatory authority. Even though the agreement is reached voluntarily, the agreement becomes a part of the binding award pronounced by the authority formed for the objective.
Contents of a collective bargaining agreement
During the process of collective bargaining, numerous matters are involved, which require numerous discussions and negotiations. Once the parties reach an inference, an agreement is signed between them, and all the points on which the parties have mutually agreed upon are mentioned in the agreement. The terms of a collective bargaining agreement fall into two main categories, namely:
The standards of agreement which are directly applicable between the particular employer and his employees of the organisation, and
The topics that regulate the relationship between the parties and which have no bearing on the individual relationship between that employer and his employees.
Let us take a detailed look at both categories.
First category
The following matters fall under the first category, i.e., the standards of agreement that are directly applicable between the particular employer and his employees of the organisation, are as follows:
Wages
Terms related to the wages or salary that may be in the form of a fixed monthly wage or a time-rate (say, for example, an individual is getting paid ₹250 per hour for adding some phone cases into plastic covers, irrespective of the number of phone cases he/she successfully adds within that hour), or a per piece rate (for example, ₹250 for adding 30 phone cases in plastic cases, irrespective of the time taken are all included in the agreement. There may also be other incentives and added bonuses for the individual paid as a part of exemplary performance, like productivity linked bonus, etc. in the agreement, there could also be a provision added to implement the necessary steps one must take while fixing rates for a new job or a different position.
Increments
Terms related to the increments or raises in salary of the workers or employers of the organisation are all included in the agreement. Additionally, whether such increments would be on a fixed basis or based on the following categories will also be mentioned in the agreement:
Rates of inflation,
Cost of living index, etc.
Duration of work
All the provisions related to the duration of work, including:
Overtime work,
The compensation a worker or employee would get for overtime hours he/she worked for,
Regulation of shifts and working hours,
Night shifts and the pay related to night shifts,
Rest period,
Provisions and facilities the employer would provide during night shifts, etc.,
are all mentioned in the agreement.
Holidays
All the details regarding the holidays are mentioned in the collective bargaining agreement,t they include but are not limited to:
Annual number of holidays,
Paid and unpaid holidays, and
Compensation and payment of work done on holidays.
Leave
All the details regarding the leaves are mentioned in the collective bargaining agreement,t they include but are not limited to:
Privilege leave,
Sick leave, and
Leave of absence (for other reasons).
The third type of leave is for employees who might have to carry on official duties outside the workplace and outside the course of their employment, for instance, an employee, who is also an office-bearer of a trade union may have to take leaves to be a part of legitimate trade union activities, amongst other things.
Provisions added by the employer
Terms related to the health and safety of an employee are also added in the collective bargaining agreement. These provisions are especially designed by the employers for the wellbeing of the employees in the organisation.
Rights
The terms related to the rights attached to positions of seniority and the principles and procedures one must follow in case of a lay-off and re-hiring of employees are all included in the agreement.
Principles
All the principles an employee must follow in case of probation and confirmation of workers, the duration of probation, etc., are mentioned in the agreement.
Laying off workers and other punishment
Provisions related to sacking of workers and other disciplinary actions relating to wrongs committed at workplace or for indiscipline at workplace and the system of investigating such acts, etc.
Number of apprentices and procedures for training
All the terms related to the number of apprentices and procedures for training are included in the agreement.
Fringe benefits
All the fringe benefits made available to employees like:
Living quarters,
House rent allowance,
Retirement plans,
Allowances for hospitalisation,
Schooling, etc.
Please note: The meaning of the word fringe means, “an extra benefit supplementing an employee’s money, wages or salary. For instance, a company car, private healthcare facility, travelling allowances, etc.)
Second category
The following matters fall under the second category i.e., the topics which regulate the relationship between the parties and which have no bearing on the individual relationship between that employer and his employees are discussed below. Usually, this matters do not have any applicability on the individual employer-employee relations per se, but seek to regulate the relationship between the employer and the employees, for instance:
Prohibition
Every term related to the ban of carrying out strikes and lockouts during the course of reaching a settlement or an agreement via the procedure of collective bargaining will be added here.
Duration
The duration of the agreement thus arrived, either by negotiations and discussion as a procedure of collective bargaining and the possibility of them persisting even after the expiry of the agreed period will be mentioned here.
Methods
Any sort of methods relating to resolving disputes, if any, as regards to the significance and interpretation of the terms of such an agreement will be included here.
Procedure for a new agreement
The procedure to be taken on in order to negotiate a new agreement after the cessation of the existing agreement shall be discussed here.
Fair procedure
Establishment of fair procedural norms and methods to be adopted for boosting production and ameliorating waste are all talked about under this category.
Procedures for joint consultation
The procedures and strategies thus carried on for joint consultation are discussed here.
Advantages and disadvantages of the process of collective bargaining
Advantages of collective bargaining
Settlement
One of the biggest advantages of the process of collective bargaining is settlement via dialogue and consensus, instead of having conflicts and confrontation. It also differs from arbitration, where the solution is based on the decision taken by a third party, usually referred to as the arbitration officer. Also, the process of arbitration may not satisfy either of the parties or even displease both parties, as it involves a win lose situation.
Agreement
The employees and employers are usually aware of their rights and responsibilities that are stated in the collective bargaining agreement. Once the terms and conditions of employment are discussed and negotiated, a contract is signed. Under this contract, both parties agree to comply with the terms that are explicitly mentioned.
Institutionalised dialogues for reaching an agreement
More often than not, the presence of collective bargaining often institutionalised settlement through dialogue which helps the parties finally reach a collective bargaining agreement. For example, through a collective argument, the parties may have methods by which the grievances between the parties may reach a conclusion; and that, in such cases both the parties are aware that if they are not agreeing to the points mentioned in the collective bargaining agreement, there is an agreed method that will help resolve such a disagreement.
More power to negotiate
As the name suggests, employees, workers, and labourers have a larger voice via the process of collective bargaining. Being together, in a group with the same goal(s) gives employees an edge over their employers to put forth their demands and negotiate to reach an agreement. Companies and organisations might be able to shut out the voices of one or two employees, but it is highly unlikely that they do the same with larger groups of unified individuals.
Encourages participation
Collective bargaining is a way of encouraging the participation of both parties to decide how much benefit each party should have. It is a form of participation as it involves the authority of rule making power being shared between employers and unions in fields like-
Transfer,
Promotion,
Redundancy,
Discipline,
Modernisation,
Norms related to the production, etc.,
which were regarded as management prerogatives in olden times.
Interesting fact : In countries like Singapore and Malaysia, subjects like- transfers, promotions, retrenchments, layoffs, and work assignments are considered to be beyond the scope of the collective bargaining process.
Improved workplace conditions
With the process of collective bargaining, the workplace conditions have to be seen to have made considerable improvements and also guarantee all workers the same protections. These improvements, amongst other things, include-
Improvement in policies related to health of employees,
Safety checks,
Salaries,
Overtime pay, and
Vacation time.
Sets limits on settlement of disputes
At times, collective bargaining restricts or sets a limit on the settlement of disputes via trade union action and mentions the same in the agreements. By entering into such agreements, industrial peace is guaranteed at least until the duration of the agreements thus signed upon.
Social partnership
The process of collective bargaining is one of the fundamental features of the concept of social partnership, a concept towards which labour relations should strive.
Valuable by-products
The process of collective bargaining has some precious by-products that are relevant between the two parties. Say, for instance, suppose there were a series of successful and bona fide dealings between two companies thus leading to building a relation of trust between them. This also plays a role in contributing towards mutual understanding by establishing persistent associations.
Improves industrial relations
Collective bargaining also has the effect of improving industrial relations. These improvements can be at various levels. Considering the continuous dialogue that takes place between the parties, which eventually helps improve relations between both the parties and also aids in building a productive relation between the union and the employers’ organisation.
High performance workplace
Usually, labour and management collectively engage in solving issues in the process of collective bargaining, this can lead to a high performance workplace, thus boosting productivity and profit.
Bilateral relationship
The process of collective bargaining also helps in providing a legally based bilateral relationship.
Protection of rights of employees and employers
Employer
During the process of collective bargaining, the management’s rights are clearly voiced out, and this is definitely an advantage to the employer.
Employee
Whereas, the employees’ rights are also safeguarded by a binding collective bargaining agreement with which the employer has to adhere to.
Benefiting from multi-year contracts
If parties decide to enter into multi-year contracts or agreements, such contracts may help the employees predict salary and also help them ascertain other issues related to compensation and remuneration.
Advancement in employment policies
Generally, the process of collective bargaining helps in promoting fairness and consistency in employment policies and personnel decisions within and across institutions and organisations.
Choice of union representation
Collective bargaining also gives the option to the employees to choose whether or not they want to have union representation. They may also choose the option of representing themselves on their own.
Workforce development
Workforce development that is necessary to engage in the technology revolution can also be promoted through a strong labour management partnership.
Voicing out grievances
The process of collective bargaining acts as an open ground for addressing grievances in an orderly manner. Employees of an organisation who have issues regarding certain aspects of their work can address the issues in a calm and collective manner via the process of collective bargaining.
Redresses the imbalance of power
In an organisation, employers have a major power within society, and carrying out negotiations and discussions via collective bargaining helps restore the balance between the employees and the employer.
Manages conflicts
All the conflicts and disputes between the social partners can be handled through the process of negotiation, which eventually helps bring about harmony in society.
Encourages peace
The process of collective bargaining plays a major role in averting strikes, thus, promoting industrial peace and harmony and thereby creating a suitable environment for FDI (foreign direct investment).
Disadvantages of collective bargaining
As witnessed above, the process of collective bargaining has numerous benefits; however, these benefits come with a price. The disadvantages of the process of collective bargaining are listed below:
Restricted freedom
After reaching a successful settlement as a result of collective bargaining, management authority and freedom are oftentimes seen to have been restricted or compromised by the negotiated rules.
Potential of polarisation
The process of collective bargaining lays the groundwork or has quite the potential for polarisation between employees and employers.
Disproportionate effect
Oftentimes, it is seen that there is a disproportionate effect of the relatively few active employees on the vast majority of the employees.
Leads to bureaucratisation and delayed decisions
The process of collecting bargaining is often seen to have created bureaucracy. Further, it also takes a long time to reach a settlement, considering the numerous negotiations and discussions taking place while following the collective bargaining process.
Increase in external participation
In some instances, collective bargaining has increased participation by external entities like:
Politicians,
Arbitrators,
State Labour Relations Board, etc.
These entities have played a major role in taking final decisions.
Restrains innovation and change
At times, collective bargaining has protected the status quo of the organisation, thereby restricting innovation and change at the workplace. This is particularly the case when the change pertains to the privatisation of an industry.
Difficulty in voicing opinions for small organisations
While following the process of collective bargaining, it becomes slightly difficult for employees belonging to small organisations and campuses to have their voices heard.
Higher management expenses
The management costs related to negotiations and the administration of agreements are often on the higher side.
Restricts management from making unilateral changes
The process of collective bargaining generally restrains the ability of the management to make unilateral changes in-
Wages,
Hours,
Other terms and conditions of employment.
The case will not be different in the case of genuine cases too.
Restrictions on dealing directly with individual employees
Collective bargaining often meddles with the management’s ability to deal directly with individual employees.
Increased dependence on private sector
Often, collective bargaining results in an increased dependency on the private sector for some services, especially those that need technological competence.
Difficulty in contract administration
The ultimate result of collective bargaining – contract administration, often becomes quite tiresome to handle. Additionally, it also changes the skills required of managers and supervisors to a huge extent.
Inadequate skills
At times, employees in Indian organisations lack the capacity or skill necessary to make good bargains in the procedure of collective bargaining. This could be the case, as at times the employees are ignorant, illiterate, or the like. In such cases, employees are forced to accept unfavourable conditions and go about working in the workplace.
Lacks public interest representation
No doubt, collective bargaining is one of the excellent solutions for labour disputes, but it does not have the capacity to involve the interests of the general public at the bargaining table. When unions, companies, and organisations agree on huge wage increases, there is a possibility that the cost of the product/commodity rises, and the consumer ultimately has to bear the weight of the increased wages as per the agreement.
Wage and grade drift
In a capitalist society, collective bargaining may cause wage and grade drift. A wage drift results in higher inflation within the economy, which in turn leads to a higher interest rate and lower investment.
Lengthy process
Collective bargaining is quite a lengthy process, and it takes employees and employers weeks or even months to reach an agreement or a settlement. In order for both parties to reach a settlement on employment terms, employers and labour union leaders have to go back and forth. During the process of collective bargaining, union leaders have to update employees and put the employment terms to vote; here, if the employees vote to not accept the contract, then the negotiation process starts from scratch all over again.
High cost
The process of collective bargaining often comes at a high cost.
Time consuming
Employees and employers have to take time off from work to negotiate employment terms, this means less time on the job, thus causing less productivity in the workplace. In other words, lengthy negotiations can often affect a company at the base level.
Considered to be biassed, at times
The process of collective bargaining is oftentimes considered biassed. At times, as employees of a company join hands and come under a single union to negotiate employment terms, employers have no option but to accept unfavourable terms in order to keep the business running without much disarray, thus being biassed against the employers.
Challenges faced in collective bargaining process
Even after the right to collective bargaining is recognised in India there are several challenges faced by Walkers and trade unions during the process of negotiation with their employers on management. These challenges include the following:
Low rate of unionisation
One of the main challenges faced in the process of collective bargaining in India is the low rate of unionisation. In India, only 10% of the workforce is unionised, reason being, India has a large informal sector which employs a significant proportion of the population and where many workers do not have the legal protection nor are they unionised.
Lack of equality in bargaining power
Another challenge the collective bargaining in India is facing is the lack of equality of the bargaining power between the employees and the employers. This is the case in sectors where employers have a major bargaining power. More often than not, employers have the power to resist demands put forth by the employees for better wages and enhanced working conditions thus leading to prolonged disputes and industrial action. Furthermore, many employers do not recognize the concept of collective bargaining or trade unions and refuse to engage in collective bargaining, thus alleviating workers’ power to bargain and negotiate.
Lack of legal protection for informal sector workers
Informal sector workers, who make up a major proportion of the Indian workforce, oftentimes do not have the legal protections and are not unionised. Subsequently, they are more vulnerable to exploitation and unfair labour practices. Moreover, many informal sector workers do not have access to social security benefits like:
Healthcare,
Pensions, etc.,
thus making them more financially unstable.
Case laws on collective bargaining
There are several famous case laws on the process of collective bargaining, some of them are as follows:
Ram Prasad Vishwakarma v. Industrial Tribunal (1961)
In this case, the Supreme Court’s bench consisted of Justice Gupta and Justice K.C. Das, observed that the labourers found it very difficult to negotiate the terms and conditions of their contracts. However, after the concept of trade unions and collective bargaining was brought into play, the situation changed and employees got the chance to voice out their opinions in a better manner.
All India Bank Employees’ Association v. N.I.Tribunal (1962)
In the case of All India Bank Employees’ Association v. N.I.Tribunal (1962), the Supreme Court dictated the rights of the members of the trade unions in accordance with the Fundamental Right to Freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(c), and started the following to be the rights:
The rights of the members of the union to meet,
Then right of the members to travel or move from.one place to another,
The right of the members to discuss and address their problems and share their point of view and opinions, and
The right of the members to hold property.
Further, this case also stated that strikes by trade unions may be controlled or restricted by appropriate industrial legislation.
Bharat Iron Works v. Bhagubhai Balubhai Patel (1976)
In the case of Bharat Iron Works v. Bhagubhai Balubhai Patel (1976), the Supreme Court via the Bench of Justice Goswami and Justice P.K. stated that the concept of collective bargaining is a part of the modern-day concept of the welfare state and that such a method should be exercised in a healthy manner and in a way where there is cooperation and respect between employees and employers. Further, the justices also claimed that negotiation between the management and the trade union aids in reaching a settlement in matters of several industrial disputes.
B. R. Singh v. Union of India (1989)
In this case, the Supreme Court recognized “strike” to be a mode of resolving disputes and grievances of the workers.
Hindustan Lever Ltd. v. Hindustan Lever Employees Union (1999)
The Courts have from time to time reiterated the importance of collective bargaining between workers and employers in modern economic life and so is the same in the case of Hindustan Lever Ltd. v. Hindustan Lever Employees Union (1999). Labourers, workers and employees faced significant hardships like poor work conditions, low wage rates, etc., before the advent of the process of collective bargaining; however, as the country’s trade unions developed and advanced, collective bargaining started becoming the norm. Further, the case also points out that employers found it easy to deal with the representatives of workers rather than individual employees themselves and this helped them in multiple ways like amending contracts, taking disciplinary action against one or more workers, and in resolving other industrial disputes.
Key takeaways
Collective bargaining is the process of negotiating employment terms between an employer and a group of workers.
This process takes place between company management and a labour union.
The matters that may be discussed in this process include
working conditions,
salaries,
compensation,
working hours, and
benefits.
The goal of collective bargaining is to come up with a unanimous agreement or contract.
There are numerous types of collective bargaining, including:
composite concessionary,
distributive,
integrative, and
productivity bargaining.
Important points to be followed
Important points to be followed : collective bargaining
The process of collective beginning plays a crucial role in settlement and prevention of industrial disputes. It has become an important tool for maintaining peace and harmony in industrial relations, and thus, the responsibility of proper implementation of this process is in the hands of both the parties, i.e., the employer as well as the employees.
Furthermore, collective bargaining should authorise the union leaders to voice out to the management the demands and desires of the employees and should also create a ground for the management to explain to the union leaders the problems and difficulties the management or the employer has to meet or fulfil such desires or demands.
There must also be an honest attempt to resolve matters and the solutions should be feasible for both the parties (and not biassed) for such problematic issues.
In order to make the process of collective bargaining work efficiently, faith and confidence in each party should be developed by both the employer and the employees (or the management).
Both the parties should respect each other equally.
The representatives of labour and management have to be honest and behave with proper responsibility.
Important points to be followed : management
The management should periodically have a look at the rules and regulations that govern the labour force and industrial relations. This will make the employees feel heard and the employers or management will gain the goodwill and trust of the employees.
The management should provide recognition to the unions without any reservations. They must also consider that the workforce is a constructive and cooperative force in the organisation. This in turn will help upgrade their status as well as their responsibility.
The management must also formulate and follow a realistic labour policy that should it only be accepted at all levels of the organisation or the company, but also be enforced in order for collective bargaining to be efficacious.
Management should work efficiently to establish a strong and satisfactory relationship between the employees, union and the representatives in order to win the confidence of unions. This will restrict the union(s) from taking any drastic measures like that of declaring a strike or any other measures that would disturb industrial relations.
Management should also put efforts to elucidate the unions or its members on the significance and usefulness of the concept of collective bargaining. They should make an attempt to explain to the employees that collective bargaining is not just a bargaining process but also a means to bring about flexibility and understanding between the parties.
The management should by themselves try to recognise, notice, understand and resolve the problem and grievances of the employees as soon as they get to know about it, instead of trade unions bringing it to their attention. Such a step will not only save industrial relations from getting complicated, but also will save one’s time and energy by avoiding the long, time consuming process of negotiation.
While carrying out the process of negotiation with the union, the management should not only think from an economic point of view but also must consider social aspects. Considering economic as well as social points of view will help the management to have a more rational and balanced negotiation.
Important points to be followed : trade unions
Trade unions have to be considerate about the economic implications of collective bargaining and realise that the demands of the unions must be met from the profit and resources of the organisation. Union should not put a lot of pressure on the management for such matters.
If the trade unions want to have a look at the complete promotion of collective bargaining, it has to put in complete efforts to eliminate undemocratic practices within their organisation.
The trade unions must also consider it their responsibility and/or obligation to help the management reduce waste and wasteful expenses. Unions should give major importance to improving the productivity and quality of production at the workplace. The union should also make use of the process of collective bargaining to boost participation of workers and to make the working conditions better at the workplace. Unions should not confine the process of collective bargaining only to increase the monetary outcome or for economic gains only.
Trade unions have to keep in mind that the process of collective bargaining is a two way street and that there has to be mutual give and take between both the parties rather than take it or leave it method.
Trade unions should not consider the process of collective bargaining as a competitive process, instead, they should think of it as a complementary process. In other words, trade unions and management both have to understand that each party needs something the other party has and that each party has to give something which the other party needs.
Moreover, as a general principle, trade unions must refrain from putting forward additional and exaggerated demands of employees in front of the management and must consider this process as one that involves compromise and flexibility instead of being stubborn. Learning and implementing to adjust and accommodate is more constructive than having conflicts and disputes.
Unions should resort to strikes and other drastic measures only when all the other methods of settling disputes have failed to be fruitful or provide a satisfactory outcome.
Collective bargaining : the way forward
Despite the numerous challenges collective bargaining as a process faces in India, they can always be improved. Mentioned below are some of the ways to make better this process:
Increase unionisation rates
One of the best ways to enhance the process of collective bargaining in India is to boost the rates of unionisation in India. This object can be accomplished by founding trade unions in the informal sector and by giving legal protection to informal sector workers. Furthermore, efforts should be put into promotion of advantages of unionisation among workers and to motivate employers to recognize trade unions and engage in the process of collective bargaining.
Encouraging dialogue and cooperation
Another method to strengthen the process of collective bargaining in India is to encourage dialogues between the employees and employers. This goal can be attained by forming dispute resolution mechanisms, like conciliation and mediation, as well as having a provision of training and support for both, the employee and the employer on the main advantages of collective bargaining and the significance of fair labour practices.
Enhancing legal protection for workers
Further, enhancing legal protections for workers, especially those coming from the informal sector, can help strengthen the process of collective bargaining in India. This objective can be attained through the implementation of laws and regulations that protect the rights of the workers to form trade unions and engage in the process of collective bargaining, as well as make provision of social security benefits to informal sector workers.
Conclusion
Collective bargaining can be defined as the process where workers, labourers and employees come together to demand improvements in workplace conditions, higher amounts of wages or salaries, better benefits, etc. By coming together and standing united, workers, labourers, and employees can negotiate with much more leverage than they would do alone. Further, employers, too, can voice their opinions and address the whole set of workers, labourers, and employees, instead of dealing with each of them separately. This process has been quite fruitful for resolving industrial disputes.
Has collective bargaining really worked
As per a survey conducted by the Bureau of Labour Statistics of the government, on average, union workers enjoy a total of 36.4% greater wage and benefit package in comparison to unorganised workers. Further, in wages alone, workers that belong to a particular trade union, enjoyed an average of 21.4% better paychecks in comparison to unorganised workers. At the end, it is important to remember that-
When workers act together, they win. When they do not, the employer wins.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on collective bargaining
What is collective bargaining? Give an example.
Collective bargaining can be defined as an official process through which employees of an organisation or trade unions on behalf of such employees negotiate with employers or management of that organisation with regards to employees’ terms and conditions of employment.
An example of collective bargaining could be the negotiation carried on by a trade union of an organisation to discuss the pay scale or change the duration of working hours.
What are the main types of collective bargaining?
The main types of collective bargaining are as follows:
Composite bargaining,
Concessionary bargaining,
Distributive bargaining,
Integrative bargaining, and
Productivity bargaining.
For more information on the main types of collective bargaining, please refer to this section.
Is collective bargaining illegal in any way?
As per the International Labour Organisation (ILO), employers have the right to form unions to represent their terms and conditions as part of their right to collective bargaining. Further, union leaders have the authority to negotiate and discuss employment terms with employers and monitor them through employment contracts. So, to sum it all up, collective bargaining is not an illegal process.
What is the scope of collective bargaining?
The process of collective bargaining has the scope of addressing concerns that affect employees and their conditions at the workplace. These issues may include:
Compensation,
Working conditions at the workplace,
The environment at workplace,
Benefits,
Company policies and procedures.
Further, collective bargaining also provides methods to resolve disputes that may occur between employers and their employees.
What are the main objectives of collective bargaining?
The main objective of collective bargaining is-
The representation of employees and the employer,
To reach an agreement on terms of employment.
This is referred to as a collective bargaining agreement or contract that includes employment terms and conditions that would benefit both parties involved.
What are the key benefits of collective bargaining?
Collective bargaining is the process of solving workplace disputes. It is also considered one of the best methods for raising wage rates in countries like the United States of America. With this process, working people in unions have higher wages, better benefits, and safer workplaces.
What is collective bargaining in India?
Collective bargaining enables workers, labourers, and employees to discuss and negotiate with their employers the terms and conditions of their employment, thus making sure their needs are met. In India, the process of collective bargaining is referred to as one of the basic rights of workers, and these rights are protected under the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947.
What is the first step in collective bargaining?
The first and initial step in the process of collective bargaining is the preparation of both parties. The parties have to have an understanding of each other’s conditions, the employer must understand the working conditions and dissatisfaction of the employees and the workplace; and the employees should understand the condition of the management or the employer. Each party should think from the other party’s perspective to reach an effective inference. Thus, preparation is the first and foremost step to reaching an effective collective bargaining settlement.
What is the right to collective bargaining and action?
In accordance with the union law and national laws and practices, workers and employers of all the organisations have the right to negotiate their terms of employment and eventually reach a settlement, which is then turned into a collective bargaining agreement after both parties agree to the terms of each other. In some cases, when the parties do not agree with the terms or see eye to eye and there is conflict of interests, the other party may take collective action to defend their interests, like strikes, layoffs, lockouts, etc.
Who can participate in the process of collective bargaining?
Collective bargaining, a voluntary process that encourages workers and employees to discuss and negotiate their relations, especially those involving workplace conditions, amongst other things.
Who introduced the concept of collective bargaining in India?
The concept of collective bargaining agreement was first made by Dunlop Rubber Company in West Bengal in 1947.
Then came the Bata Shoe Company in West Bengal.
Later, in 1951, the Indian Aluminium Company made its five year agreement with employees union in Belur.
What is the importance of collective bargaining in industrial relations?
There are several benefits to using collective bargaining as a process of negotiation between the employee and employer to enhance the word place conditions; however, the following are the major benefits one can derive from the process of collective bargaining:
improvement in wages and working conditions,
equality between all the people working for the organisation of the company,
provides a stage for both parties to voice their grievances, i.e., management and workers are considered to be on the same level at the negotiation table as a procedure for the process of collective bargaining.
Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) on collective bargaining
The term used when an employer refuses to give work opportunities to someone?
Injunction
Lock out
Grievance procedure
Strike procedure
Answer: (b)
What is the term used when there is a combined denial of buying products of employers, union members, as well as employees?
Impasse boycott
Boycott
Picketing
Strike
Answer : (b)
The types of third party negotiation, known as arbitration, include which of the following terms:
Binding arbitration
Non-binding arbitration
Interest arbitration
All of the above
Answer : (d)
In accordance with a business perspective, employees carrying sign language to depict their concerns, are termed as
Picketing
Strike
Impasse boycott
Boycott
Answer : (a)
The kind of union security wherein organisations can hire current union members is referred to as
Closed shop
Agency shop
Union shop
Preferential shop
Answer : (a)
Collective bargaining is defined under which of the following acts?
National Labour Relations Act
Occupational Safety and Health Act
Civil Rights Act
Fair Labour Standards Act
Answer : (a)
When an employer refuses to bargain or carry out a negotiation with the employees’ representative, it is called:
Executive proceeding
Economic strike
Arbitration proceeding
Unfair labour practices
Answer : (d)
The parties engaged in a collective bargaining process involve
Employee representative and the employer
Employee and the employer
Employer and the labour inspector
Labour inspector and an employee
ANSWER: (a)
Which of the following is an outcome of the process of collective bargaining?
Arbitration award
Award of Tribunal
Award of Labour Court
Consent award
Answer : (d)
References
3rd edition on the Maharashtra Recognition Of Trade Unions And Prevention Of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, and Principles Of Collective Bargaining by Prof. H. D. Pithawalla, Chapter 11 (Collective Bargaining), C. Jamnadas & Co. Production, Pg- 42 to 57.
Charlie Munger is an investor and thinker from the USA. He was the Vice Chairman of the multinational conglomerate Berkshire Hathaway, which has $780 billion in market capitalization. Berkshire holds equity shares in top-tier companies like Apple, Bank of America, Coca-Cola, Chevron Corporation, Kraft-Heinz, Moody’s Corporation, and many more across the globe.
Mr. Charlie Munger was considered the right hand of the legendary investor Warren Buffett and was influenced by his investment approach. Hence, he was vital in shaping the success of Berkshire Hathaway. He was vocal about the world order and so-called ‘innovative’ financial instruments. He was a philanthropist and an architect in his own way. He is known for his mental models, which he used during decision-making. He passed away on November 28, 2023, at the age of 99 years.
Major contributions of Charlie Munger
Charlie Munger was well known for his wit. He evolved from his childhood and kept learning lifelong. These combinations made him unique and critical in various subjects.
The following are his major contributions:
Changed Warren Buffet’s mindset from cigar-butt to value investing. Warren Buffett himself was trained under Benjamin Graham, who was considered in many ways the father of value investing. However, Warren was struggling with scaling and long-term investment philosophy, which was evident through the purchase of Berkshire Hathaway, a textile mill company.
Charlie Munger embedded him with a long-term value investment idea and later joined the board to build Berkshire Hathaway in today’s state. Hence, he was instrumental in creating wealth for millions of investors across the globe.
Charlie Munger served as Chairman and CEO of Wesco Financial Corporation, which was a holding company and later became a subsidiary of Berkshire.
Charlie Munger was Chairman of Daily Journey Corporation, a newspaper, law firm, and legal technology company.
He helped in the design of multiple architectural buildings, like dormitories at Stanford University and the University of Michigan. He passionately designed his final home, too.
He was a philanthropist. Donated millions to the University of California, University of Michigan, and the hospital.
Personal life of Charlie Munger
Charlie Munger’s childhood was shaped by modesty. His father was a lawyer, and his grandfather was a US district court judge. Since childhood, he has recognised the role of luck in life, and he gives credit to his successful investment journey. He was educated at California Tech and Harvard Law School. After his divorce from his first wife, he remarried Nancy Barry, and they had a total of seven children.
Early career of Charlie Munger
Charlie Munger started his career in California at the Wright & Garrett law firm. Later, he started practicing as a real estate attorney in California. He started managing investments and became a real estate developer. He started running his own investment firm between 1962 and 1975. Munger was the chairman of Wesco Financial Corporation, which later became a subsidiary of Berkshire. Wesco held concentrated holdings, including Coca-Cola, Wells Fargo, Procter & Gamble, US Bancorp, and Goldman Sachs, worth $1.5 billion.
Munger was also the chairman of the Daily Journal Corporation, which is a publishing and technology company. The company was founded way back in 1886. Apart from carrying commercial advertising, it even developed software for trial and appellate courts. Munger, being a keen learner and observant, was an architect, though he had no formal education in it. He contributed multiple building designs, including dormitories, for Stanford University and the University of Michigan. He loved to design and architect his own houses.
Turning point in Charlie Munger’s life
In 1959, at an Omaha club party, Charlie Munger and Warren Buffett met for the first time. For hours, they discussed topics related to investment and life. They naturally got attracted to each other. Since then, they have been in touch through hours of telephonic conversations. Meanwhile, Munger independently managed an investment counselling firm from 1962 to 1975 with a 19.8% compounded return.
Finally, Buffett convinced Munger to join Berkshire Hathaway in 1978. He argued that people of a similar calibre should be doing more valuable work, like investments. And joked that law may be good as a hobby. This is a critical juncture for Munger, Buffett, and Berkshire.
Charlie Munger with a 30-second mind
In life, a person would get an edge over people around them if he or she was able to make decisions faster and better in probabilistic scenarios. Munger trained his mind to do exactly the same. He developed various models and filters in his mind. For instance, he quickly ran through them to decide the prospectus of it. Munger could take any complex problem and dissect it in such a way to solve it effectively. It is a multi-fold phenomenon:
He could stick to the principles and make sure ongoing events meet his criteria for the journey.
It avoids mistakes and helps keep actions in perspective.
As prepared, it gave him the opportunity to bet big to take advantage of it fully. He needed only a few decisions in life to magnify his finances and life events.
Munger vividly explained in his speech at Harvard Law School as ‘The Psychology of Human Misjudgement’ where he listed 24 standard causes named as tendencies. It clearly elaborated on how he dealt with life and learned over the period. The following are a few biases:
Reinforcement bias: The person starts to look for documents, media, and people who are all discussing positively about that company or theme. Humans love mingling with it for a long time and not only get biased but also hooked on it. We spend a lot of time and energy doing activities and get carried away easily.
Question for you: How often do you do it? What are you doing to recognise this bias?
Incentives caused bias: This is so powerful that you observe in your daily life from a child to a top-position person. Incentives are becoming so prominent in society that you could observe a person’s behaviour and derive what vested interest he or she has. Many people get trapped in fancy financial products sold by ‘agents’ without questioning what they are interested in selling.
Psychological denial: Few people are slow learners or never accept the facts. They love to stay in a state and deny new information to change opinions or actions. It demands rationality and factuality in life.
Bias from envy or jealousy: This bias is seen all around us. The same bias leverages many companies by hiring celebrities to market products and services. Envy takes away people from Self & Peace and gets into a whirlpool of endless cribbing. We need to be watchful of our thoughts and actions and not carry away envy.
Bias from misgambling compulsion: People pick the lottery and think they have committed to it. We know Yudhishtir’s gamble in the Mahabharata, and he lost everything, from his spouse to his kingdom.
Learnings and quotes
The best and quickest way to learn from Munger is through his interviews, Q&A sessions at Berkshire, the Daily Journal, and speeches. He spoke on multiple subjects, from human evolution to politics to investments. There are multiple books available on him. Also, many websites collected his teachings on multiple platforms. He himself was devoted to it as a lifelong learner. His children described him as a book with hands and legs. Let’s dissect a few of his quotes to understand them better.
“Need to be a lifelong learner and advocate as a moral duty” – Humans have a unique gift to think and learn each day, apart from other animals.
“You have to keep learning if you want to become a great investor. When the world changes, you must change.” – Now it became more apparent to learn not only to grow but to survive with changing technology. Hence, you could see companies remodelling their business plans to adapt to artificial intelligence and machine learning to productize and deliver services to remain relevant.
“The best thing a human being can do is help another human being know more” – It is the ultimate way of giving back. It is said, ‘Do not give a fish to a hungry man, but teach how to fish.’
“Invert, always invert” – It is an everyday tool to get insight into what if I am on the other side of a deal and why ‘Agents’ are keen to sell products. The tool helps us question our bias and think rationally.
“Remember that reputation and integrity are your most valuable assets – and can be lost in a heartbeat.” – We see around us what happens to people who lose these assets. It takes ages to earn, and a single event or behaviour could ruin it.
“To the man with a hammer, every problem tends to look pretty much like a nail.” – This quote from Munger is profound. It demands that we have a set of tools to solve problems in life. And not to stick to single problem-solving approach. It would take back to us to keep learning and always be ready with multiple ways to solve a problem, or each problem has a different solution, and we need to apply them accordingly.
“Like Warren, I had a considerable passion to get rich,” said Charlie, who early on earned his living as a lawyer. “Not because I wanted Ferraris—I wanted the Independence.” – This secret is known to only a few percent of people in the world and embarrasses independence. It allows a person to identify their own passion and realise their true potential.
Food for thought: Which lifestyle would you be following if money were not the factor? What makes you want to get up in the morning and cheer?
“If you took our top fifteen decisions out (at Berkshire), we’d have a pretty average record. It wasn’t hyperactivity, but a hell of a lot of patience. You stuck to your principles and when opportunities came along, you pounced on them with vigor.” – In investment, one needs to design and build their own principles and framework. Opportunities do not come often, and when they do, you need to seize them big time. It needs tonnes of patience, clarity of thought, courage, and many more aspects.
“A great business at a fair price is superior to a fair business at a great price.” – Investors need to hunt for great businesses that are sustainable and run by able and honest people.
“The big money is not in the buying or the selling, but in the waiting.” – Patience, as a virtue that he followed and made big bucks.
“The idea of excessive diversification is madness.” – We see people use diversification mindlessly without understanding what it is. Diversification could be a tool to manage risk. The risk may come from business failure, promoter misbehaviour, industry challenges, government policies, and many other factors.
“I think that every time you see the word EBITDA, you should substitute the words “bullsh*t earnings.” – Many businesses report EBITDA growth. Anyone who could understand financial statements and notes to them could make out that EBITDA reporting is not the real story of business growth. The problem with EBITDA is that it gives many opportunities to hide information and report it.
Conclusion
Charlie Munger is a one-of-a-kind legend who not only kept learning his entire life but also applied it. He was introverted and had many different personalities than Warren Buffett, though both remained partners, holding Berkshire board. This partnership is worth studying and learning more about, as they have different personalities in many ways, both respect each other, and have never had arguments.
The passing away of Munger created a void in Warren’s life and sure in the core investment decision-making theme of Berkshire: Invert-always-invert. Finally, we should be learning not only investment lessons from Munger but also how to live life and build harmonious surroundings for a more progressive society. This would be the real tribute to the legend.
References
Charles T. Munger (Author), Peter D. Kaufman (Editor) (2005). Poor Charlie’s Almanack: The Wit and Wisdom of Charles T. Munger Walsworth Publishing Company. ISBN-13 978-1578645015.
Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:
This article is written by Monesh Mehndiratta, of Graphic Era Hill University, Dehradun. The article explains two important concepts related to the performance of contracts. These are the doctrine of part performance and the doctrine of specific performance of the contract. The article first explains the meaning, application, origin, and essentials of the doctrine of part performance along with recent case laws, and the concept of specific performance of a contract, its meaning, application, and other essentials along with related judgements.
Table of Contents
Introduction
A, a person (promissory) promised B, another person (promisee) to deliver goods to him after payment of Rs. 50,000/- and entered into a contract with him. The payment was duly made, but the promisor failed to deliver the said goods, as a result of which he was sued by the other person, B. What do you think is the reason for suing the promisor?
Yes, it is the performance of the contract. The promisor failed to perform his duties, as a result of which he was sued for non-performance of the contract.
This clearly shows that the performance of a contract is one of its essential aspects. Once the parties enter into a contract, they are bound to perform their respective acts and fulfill their obligations. If any of them fails to do so, it amounts to a breach of contract. What if one of the parties partly performs the contract? Will it be considered a valid performance of the contract? What technicalities are involved while applying the doctrine?
These are some questions that are related to the performance of the contract. The present article deals with the doctrines of part performance and specific performance of contracts. It explains the two concepts separately. Firstly, it explains the doctrine of part performance, its evolution, meaning, essentials, application, and landmark judgements. Further, it explains another concept of specific performance in detail.
Doctrine of part performance
Meaning of the doctrine of part performance
The doctrine of part performance in India is recognized under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The doctrine simply means that where two people enter into an agreement and one of the parties acts in consonance with the agreement, it creates equity, presuming that the other party will also perform its obligations. So, if the other party later denies or acts fraudulently by refusing to fulfil his duties as mentioned in the agreement, the doctrine of part performance is applied to safeguard the interest of the party who performed acts in furtherance of the agreement. Thus, the doctrine is embodied to protect the interests of transferees who take possession of the property but are not able to obtain the title after paying the consideration in part or whole and where the transferor later denies such an agreement or sues him for the possession. This doctrine prevents such instances and provides justice to genuine and innocent transferees.
Illustration: X enters into a contract with Y regarding the transfer of a flat on payment of consideration. The contract also provided that on partial payment of consideration, Y could take possession, and so he did. Later, X denies transferring the title to the property, stating that he does not want to sell the flat. The doctrine of part performance will be applied here to protect the interest of Y, either by asking X to repay the consideration paid or by performing the contract and transferring the title of the property to Y.
Objective of the doctrine of part performance
Based on the maxim that one who seeks equity must do it, the doctrine has the following objectives:
It ensures that both parties to a contract, i.e., the transferor and transferee, perform their parts and fulfill their obligations as mentioned in the contract.
It preserves and protects the rights of the transferee towards ownership of the property.
It prevents fraudulent acts by transferors who try to take advantage of innocent transferees.
By virtue of this doctrine, the transferor or any other person under his name is barred from enforcing any right on the said property against the transferee except those mentioned in the contract.
Evolution of the doctrine of part performance
The concept of part performance can be said to have originated in English law with the Court of Equity, also known as the Court of Chancery. The Statute of Frauds, 1677, imposed certain restrictions on contracts and provided that any contract for the transfer of immovable property must be made in writing. This led to a situation where a genuine and innocent transferee could not obtain title to the property even after paying the consideration in part or whole and taking possession as a result of the agreement. Such people faced disadvantages and were harassed most of the time. The principle of equity was evolved to protect and help such people. It covered transfers based on oral agreements and where the transferee fulfilled their part.
The case of Walsh v. Lonsdale (1882) helped in developing the jurisprudence of the doctrine of part performance. In this case, Lonsdale wanted to give Walsh a lease, wherein the rent must be paid in advance. This was, however, not embodied in the deed, and when Walsh took possession, arrears of rent were created, as a result of which an execution against the premises was issued by Lonsdale. The Court of Appeal in this case held that one who seeks equity must also do it and that equity is related to intent and not to form. It was further held that the rules of equity must prevail, and the lease was treated as if it were enforceable from the date of the agreement where it was granted.
Another case that led to the development of the doctrine was Maddison v. Alderson (1883), wherein the plaintiff claimed the property of the defendant on the basis of an oral agreement where the defendant agreed to transfer his property to her in exchange for the plaintiff’s housekeeping services. The plaintiff, as a result of the oral agreement, performed her duties honestly. However, the will was alleged to be invalid because it was not attested. The English Court of Appeal, in this case, explained the significance of the doctrine and held that the defendant, in this case, is liable for the equities that arose from the acts done in the execution of the contract, and if such equities are neglected, it would result in injustice.
Position of the doctrine of part performance in India
The application of the doctrine in India can be traced back to the case of Mahomed Musa v. Aghore Kumar Ganguly (1914), wherein the Privy Council held that the law of India and the Law of England is the same and follow the same rule and so the Indian Law is not inconsistent with the principles of part performance In this case, there was a written compromise deed that was not registered and stated that the land was to be divided among the parties. The deed was, however, challenged because it was not registered. The Privy Council applied the doctrine of part performance in this case and held that since the deed was made in writing, it is a legal document.
However, in the case of G.F.C. Ariff v. Rai Jadunath Majumder Bahadur (1931), the Privy Council held the opposite of what was laid out in the above case. The Council doubted whether the doctrine be applied in cases that require registration of a document essential for the creation of a title. It was held that the doctrine could not be applied to the present case because the right of the respondent to sue was barred due to a verbal contract. This led to a controversy regarding the application of the doctrine in India, as a result of which a Special Committee was set up in 1927 to decide on the issue, as mentioned in the case of Mahadeo Nathuji Patil v. Surjabai Khushalchand Lakkad (1993). The Committee observed that the doctrine must be given statutory recognition, but the law of registration must not be forgotten or evaded. For the application of the doctrine, the Committee made the following recommendations:
The agreement must be written.
The transferee must have taken possession of the property as a result of part performance or an act in furtherance.
The transferee who wants to avail himself of the doctrine must be willing to perform his part.
The rights and liabilities must be enforceable between the parties when the contract has been partly performed.
The doctrine must not affect the rights of transferees.
The Committee also suggested that the expiration of the limitation period must not affect the relationship between the transferor and transferee and that there should be no impact on the protection given by the doctrine. Based on its recommendations, Section 53A was inserted in the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. This Section recognises the doctrine of part performance, and in this way, the doctrine was made applicable to Indian scenarios.
Essential elements of the doctrine of part performance
In order to take benefit of the doctrine mentioned in Section 53A of the Act, the following essential elements must be fulfilled:
Written contract for the transfer of immovable property
It is also necessary that the contract fulfill all the requirements of a valid contract and be signed by the parties. In the case of Smt. Hamida v. Smt. Humer and Ors. (1992), the Allahabad High Court held that the terms of a contract must not be vague or ambiguous but certain and expressed clearly. It must also be noted that Section 53A is not applicable to contracts that are void. This means that the contract must have a lawful purpose, there must be an offer and acceptance of that offer, free consent of the parties, lawful consideration, and intention to create legal relationships.
A valid consideration
The contract for the transfer of immovable property must have a valid consideration. Consideration is also one of the essentials of a valid contract under Section 10 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. This means that the doctrine in India is only applicable to those cases where the immovable property is transferred for consideration and not as a gift.
Possession of immovable property
The Section clearly provides that the transferee must have taken possession of the property as a result of part performance of a contract, continue to be in possession, or do an act in furtherance in order to claim the benefits mentioned therein. The same was reiterated in the case of A.M.A Sultan v. Seydu Zohra Beevi (1989).
Part performance of the contract
For the application of Section 53A, one of the essential ingredients is that the contract must be partly performed or that the transferee is willing to perform its part. If the transferee is already in possession, it must be continued or an act in furtherance of such possession must be done. The court in the case of Chinnaraj v. Sheik Davood Nachiar (2002) observed that where a person refused to fulfil his obligations as given in the contract, no benefits of Section 53A could be claimed.
Application of the doctrine of part performance
The primary objective of the doctrine contained in Section 53A of the Act is to protect the rights and interests of transferees. The Section is only applicable where:
There is a written contract to transfer the immovable property.
The transferee has-
taken possession of the property as a result of part performance or,
Continued to be in possession if he was already in possession,
Does an act in furtherance of the said contract.
The transferee wilfully performs his part or is willing to do so.
The transfer has not been completed by the transferor according to the contract.
In the case of Balaraja and Anr. v. Syed Masood Rowther and Anr. (1998), the Madras High Court held that for the application of the doctrine or to enforce the rights of transferees as mentioned under Section 53A, the necessary conditions must be fulfilled. The conditions are:
The doctrine can only be applied to a legally valid and enforceable contract.
The contract must be registered in order to reap the benefits of Section 53A.
The Section is inapplicable to oral agreements.
For the application of the section, it is necessary that possession has been taken by the transferee as a result of part performance.
The transferee must also be willing to perform his part of the contract or do an act in furtherance of it.
Exception to the doctrine of part performance
It is clearly known that Section 53A applies to contracts where the transferee has performed his part of the contract and taken possession of the property as a consequence of the performance. However, there is an exception that provides that the doctrine will not be applied to subsequent transferees who have no idea regarding the contract or its part performance. This means that the provision will not be applicable to bona fide transferees who, after entering into a contract, are unaware of the terms of the contract and its part performance by the transferor.
The Supreme Court in the case of Hemraj v. Rustomji (1952) held that the exception to the Section given in the proviso protects the interests of bona fide transferees who have no knowledge regarding the part performance of the contract done by the transferor. It is thus necessary that the party who tries to take the defence under Section 53A prove that the subsequent transferee was aware of the part performance of the contract and received a notice regarding the same.
Consequences of amendment to Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882
Before the amendment, the benefits of Section 53A and the doctrine recognition therein could be claimed on the basis of unregistered documents as well. However, after the enactment of the Registration and Other Related Laws (Amendment) Act, 2001, the unregistered documents were not accepted to claim the benefits of the doctrine of part performance contained in the Section. In the case of Wg. Cdr. (Retd.) Sh. Yeshvir Singh v. Dr. O.P. Kohli & Ors. (2015), the Delhi High Court, while dealing with the issue of declaration of title in a suit, held that due to the 2001 amendment, an agreement to sell is not valid and cannot create any rights until it is registered and stamped at 90% of the value of the deed according to Article 23A of Schedule 1 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899.
Further, in the case of Suhrid Singh v. Randhir Singh (2010), the Supreme Court observed that if an executant of a sale deed wants the deed to be annulled, he has to seek its cancellation, but if a non-executant seeks it, he has to show the deed is invalid, illegal, or non-binding on him and will also have to pay an ad-valorem court fee according to Article 17(iii) of the Second Schedule of the Court Fees Act, 1870. However, if the non-executant seeking to do so is not in possession of the property, he will have to pay the court fee according to Section 7(iv)(c) of the Court Fees Act, 1870. The Supreme Court in the case of Shiv Kumar Saxena v. Manishchand Sinha (2004) laid down certain principles regarding the payment of stamp duty. These are:
Stamp duty can be levied only on the instrument and not on any transaction.
The substance of the transaction mentioned in the instrument determines how much stamp duty is to be paid.
In order to find out the true character of an instrument, the whole document has to be read and taken into consideration.
In another case, Ameer Minhaj v. Dierdre Elizabeth (Wright) Issar (2017), the Supreme Court observed that if a party wants to use a contract made for transferring rights, title, or interest in immovable property for some consideration for the purpose of Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, it has to be registered, and if not registered, the document or contract cannot be used for the said purpose according to Section 17(1A) of the Registration Act, 1908.
Position with respect to lease deeds
The lease is governed by Section 105 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. In the case of Prasad Technology Park Pvt. Ltd. v. Sub Registrar & Ors. (2005), there was a dispute related to a lease. It was held that the execution of an instrument for which stamp duty is to be paid must involve the transfer of property, a right, or a liability. Once it is declared that the supplementary agreement is neither a lease nor a sale deed, no such stamp duty is to be paid. The Supreme Court further held that the High Court was incorrect in holding that the supplementary lease agreement was not an instrument and that stamp duty was to be paid.
Further, in the case of Egon Zhender International Pvt. v. M/S Namgyal Institute (2013), the Delhi High Court observed that an unregistered document can only be used to demonstrate the nature of possession rather than create any right in favour of the lessee. It was also observed that the creation of a lease is not collateral and cannot be called so within the meaning of Section 49 of the Registration Act, 1908.
Difference between English law and Indian Law of the doctrine of part performance
Basis of difference
English law
Indian law
Essential elements of the doctrine
Under English law, the doctrine can be applied even if there is an oral contract between the parties.
Under Indian law, it is necessary that the contract must be in writing in order to take the benefit of the doctrine.
Scope of the doctrine
The scope of the doctrine in English law is wider than in Indian law. It is both an action and a defence there.
The doctrine can only be taken as a defence in Indian law and hence, the scope is limited.
Applicability of the doctrine
Any conduct in furtherance of contract is sufficient for the application of this doctrine in English Law.
For the application of the doctrine in India, the property or any part of it must be in possession of a transferee.
Statute mentioning the doctrine
Unlike Indian law, the doctrine is not mentioned in any statute but provides equitable rights to the parties.
The doctrine provides a statutory right under Indian Law as it is mentioned under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
Landmark judgments on the doctrine of part performance
Shrimant Shamrao Suryawanshi v. Pralhad Bhairoba Suryanvanshi (2002)
Facts of the case
In the present case there was an agreement for the sale of agricultural land between the respondent and appellant. The appellant took possession of the property as a result of the agreement but later found that the respondent was negotiating the sale agreement for the same land with another person. The appellant filed a suit for injunction against the respondent and was granted the same, but the respondent still sold the property to another person. The other person to whom the land was sold filed suit for its possession, which was opposed by the appellant. However, the trial court dismissed the suit, stating that the appellant’s title had not been proven. In the Letter Patent Appeal by the respondent, the court observed that the appellant is not entitled to possession as the suit for performance of the sale agreement is barred by limitation.
Issues involved in the case
Whether the appellant is entitled to take advantage of the doctrine of part performance in the present case if the suit for specific performance is barred by limitation.
Judgement of the court
The court in this case observed that the appellant was willing to perform his part of the contract and was prepared for the same. The court further stated that even if the suit is barred by limitation, the appellant can still defend his rights only if he is able to prove he did an act in furtherance of the agreement or is willing to do so. Thus, the court in this case held that the appellant is entitled to take benefits of the doctrine of part performance given in Section 53A of the Act.
Union of India v. M/S K.C. Sharma and Co. (2020)
Facts of the case
In this case, the government acquired certain land from the respondents that was leased to them. The respondents contended that they must be compensated for the same as the land was in their possession. The civil court held that the government must compensate them 87% of the amount and give the remaining to the Panchayat of the village. A writ petition was filed by some of the aggrieved villagers against the order of the civil court, and the petitioners argued that those who filed the petition were not the lessees. The High Court asked the Additional District Magistrate to be a part of the proceedings.
The appellant filed an appeal in the Delhi High Court on the ground that the order of the Civil Court was obtained by fraud because there was no lease agreement regarding the land. This was transferred to the trial court, where the judgement was passed in favour of the appellant. Aggrieved by the judgement, the respondents went to the High Court, where the judgement of the trial court was reversed. The case was finally appealed to the Supreme Court.
Issues involved in the case
Whether the doctrine of part performance be applied in this case where the lease agreement is not registered.
Judgement of the court
In this case the respondents argued that they are entitled to benefits given under Section 53A of the Act even though there was no registered lease agreement. The Supreme Court in this case observed that the respondents were given possession of the land as a result of a lease, so in this situation, a lease agreement is not necessary. This is because the intentions of the parties are clear, and the lease was also approved by the board of directors. Further, the Court held that where there is a genuine contract but no registered document, the parties can still seek the benefits of Section 53A of the Act.
Joginder Tuli v. State of NCT of Delhi (2022)
Facts of the case
In this case, the petitioner signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the deceased respondent regarding the sale of a shop for consideration. However, the MoU was not registered. He contended that he was not given possession because the family of the deceased contracted a builder for construction on the said property. Due to a dispute between the parties, the police asked the petitioner to present the necessary documents. Despite showing the MoU, the property was sealed. After some time, the builder started negotiating with the petitioner for the sale of the said property and threatened him for the same, as a result of which the petitioner filed a writ petition in the Delhi High Court.
Issues involved in the case
Is it necessary to present the registered documents to seek the benefits of Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882?
Judgement of the court
In this case it was held that in the absence of registered documents or evidence regarding the possession of property, the benefits of Section 53A of the Act cannot be claimed. Section 17(e)(1A) and Section 49 of the Registration Act also provide that only registered documents can be accepted as evidence. Thus, the petitioner was not entitled to any benefits given under Section 53A because no registered document regarding the possession of the property was produced by him.
Doctrine of specific performance of contracts
Meaning of the doctrine of specific performance of contracts
Whenever either party to a contract fails to perform their obligations, it leads to a breach of contract. In this situation, the party who suffered a loss due to a breach of contract can either ask for damages or a specific performance of the contract. Thus, the doctrine of specific performance of a contract simply means to perform the contractual obligations as they are.
Illustration: A agreed to sell goods to B at a 50% discount if B paid the whole amount at once. B paid the entire amount at once, but A refused to give him the goods. Now, B can file a suit against A for specific performance of the contract for the delivery of said goods.
This remedy of specific performance of the contract is contained in Chapter 2, Section 9-19 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. This law was initially codified under the Specific Relief Act, 1877 which was further taken into consideration by the Law Commission. The commission recommended enacting the existing Act of 1963 in its Ninth report. Like the doctrine of part performance, the doctrine of Specific performance of the contract is also an equitable doctrine used to grant relief to the party suffering loss due to a breach of contract or where the other party failed to perform its contractual obligations.
Features of the Specific Relief Act, 1963
The Act has been enacted to provide specific remedies to the genuine and innocent parties to a contract who suffer a loss due to the other party’s failure to fulfill its contractual obligations. The Act has the following peculiar features:
It provides the following kinds of remedies:
Possession of immovable property.
Specific performance of contracts.
Rectify the instructions.
Rescind the contract.
Cancel the instruments.
Decrees declaring the rights or status of a person.
Preventive reliefs like injunctions, perpetual injunctions, etc.
The Act also provides that the relief contained therein can only be enforced for individual rights.
The Act empowers the person who has been thrown out of possession of an immovable property to file a suit for recovery of its possession.
The Act further enlists the persons who can seek relief under the Act under Section 15.
It also deals with the enforcement of awards.
The Act also provides for the substituted performance of contracts under Section 20.
It also empowers the High Court to establish special courts under this Act to try suits related to infrastructure project contracts.
Applicability of the doctrine of specific performance of contracts
In order to seek specific performance of a contract, it is necessary that the conditions laid down under Section 10 are fulfilled. The Section provides that the remedy of the specific performance of a contract can be claimed according to the provisions of Sections 11, 14, and 16 of the Act. Section 11 provides that when the act agreed upon by the parties is to be performed by a trust, it can be enforced by the specific performance. However, if a contract is made by a trustee who exercised his powers excessively, it cannot be enforced by specific performance. Sections 14 and 16 have been explained in detail further in the article.
The court in the case of Ram Karan v. Govind Lal (1999), held that compensation in money is not enough remedy where the seller refuses to execute the sale deed after the buyer has paid the whole consideration and is thus ordered to specifically perform his part.
Circumstances where a contract cannot be performed specifically
Section 14 of the Act provides circumstances where a contract cannot be performed specifically, and thus, the doctrine of specific performance cannot be applied:
A party to a contract sought substituted performance of the contract and obtained the same.
Cases involving contracts related to performing a continuous duty that cannot be supervised by the court.
Cases involving contracts depend on the personal qualifications of the parties.
Cases where a contract can be determined or revoked by the parties to a contract.
Section 14(3) provides certain exceptions where the specific performance of a contract can be enforced:
Suits relating to the execution of mortgages.
Suits relating to furnishing security for repayment of a loan where the borrower is not interested in repaying it all at once.
Suits for debentures of a company.
Suit for the execution of the formal deed of partnership.
Suit for purchasing shares from a partner.
Suit for construction of buildings or any other work on any property, but where the following conditions are satisfied:
The work is properly described in the contract so as to determine its nature.
The plaintiff must have a substantial interest in the contract.
Compensation in money must not be adequate.
Defendants must take possession of the land where the construction is to be done.
However, after the 2018 Amendment to the Act, clauses 2 and 3 of Section 14 have been removed from the Act, and further, Section 14A has been inserted, which empowers the court to engage experts in a suit under the Act.
Persons who can obtain enforcement of specific performance of contract
The Act, under Section 15, enlists the persons who can seek or obtain specific performance of a contract. These are:
Either of the parties to a contract.
Person who is the representative in interest or principal. However, where a contract provides for any learning skill or quality as its ingredient, the representative in interest or principal will not seek specific performance of the contract unless the party has performed his contractual obligations.
Any person as a beneficiary where the contract is related to the settlement of marriage or compromise between the family members.
The reminder man where the contract is related to tenancy and the tenant has entered into it for life.
Revisioner who is in possession and entitled to seek the benefits of the covenant.
Revisioner in the remainder.
A limited liability partnership arising out of an amalgamation of two limited liability partnerships.
A company arising out of amalgamation.
Company where its promoters entered into a contract before its incorporation. In this situation, it is necessary that the company has accepted the contract and that the same has been communicated to the other party to a contract.
However, Section 16 acts as an exception to Section 15 and provides a list of persons in whose favour specific performance cannot be enforced. These are:
Any person who cannot seek compensation for breach of contract.
A person who is not capable of performing the contract, violates it or commits fraud with respect to the contract.
A person who fails to prove that he performed or is willing to perform the contract In this situation, the person must prove that he is ready and willing to perform the contractual obligations. In cases where a contract is related to the payment of money, the plaintiff is not required to pay the money to the defendant or deposit the same in court unless asked to do so.
According to Section 19 of the Act, the relief of specific performance can be enforced against the following:
Either party to contract.
Any person who claimed under him a title subsequent to the contract except for a transferee who paid money in good faith.
Any other person who claimed under a title that had been displaced by the defendant prior to the contract.
A limited liability partnership arising out of amalgamation between two limited liability partnerships.
A company arising out of amalgamation.
Company where its promoters entered into a contract before its incorporation. In this situation, it is necessary that the company has accepted the contract and that the same has been communicated to the other party to the contract.
Substituted performance of contract
The remedy of substituted performance of contract has been added to the Act by virtue of the Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 2018. It is mentioned under Section 20 of the Act. It provides that where a party to a contract suffers due to breach of contract or its non-performance by the other party because of which the contract is broken, he can ask for the remedy of substituted performance of contract through any third person or by his own agency and can recover the losses or costs suffered due to such breach or non-performance.
However, no such remedy can be sought unless the party who suffered a loss due to breach of contract or its non-performance by another party, has served notice of not less than 30 days to the other party asking him to fulfil the obligations mentioned in the contract within the time specified in the notice. If the other party refuses or fails to do so, the same can be performed by a third party or his own agency, but if the contract is performed by them, the party suffering loss cannot claim relief of specific performance against the party who breached the contract. Also, he cannot recover the loss or expenses unless the contract is performed by a third party or his own agency. The section further provides that the party who suffered due to a breach of contract by others can claim compensation from such a party.
Recent judgments on specific performance of contract
Gobind Ram v. Gian Chand (2000)
Facts of the case
In this case, there was an agreement to sell between the appellant and respondent, as a result of which the respondent paid the earnest money to the appellant. However, a suit for specific performance was filed against the appellant when there was a failure to execute the sale deed. The appellant, however, appealed for an award of compensation instead of specific performance of the sale deed.
Issues involved in the case
Whether the decree of specific performance can be granted in this case.
Judgement of the court
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in this case observed that it is a settled principle of law that specific performance of a contract is not mandatory and depends on the discretion of the court. While granting a decree for specific performance, the court has to look into the question of whether it is fair, just, and equitable to do so. Further, it was held that the respondent has not taken any undue advantage of the appellant and has paid the consideration in the lower courts as directed. Thus, it would be unfair to deny the decree of specific performance, and so the decree was passed in favour of the respondent.
Parveen Garg v. Satpal Singh and another (2018)
Facts of the case
In this case, the appellant, who is a government contractor, was looking for a property and entered into an agreement for sale with the respondent. The appellant also paid the earnest money. The transaction, according to the agreement, was to be completed by 1.11.2003. The appellant contended that during the whole time, he was not shown the title deeds of the property or other relevant documents. The respondent did not give the certificate of conversion of property from leasehold to freehold, and when asked by the appellant, the respondent said that permission for conversion could not be obtained due to unavoidable circumstances. The appellant thus filed a suit for specific performance of the agreement.
Issues involved in the case
Whether the decree of specific performance can be granted in this case.
Judgement of the court
The court in this case observed that the appellant could not be granted a decree of specific performance as he failed to prove that he was ready and willing to perform the contract obligations until the suit was disposed of. Thus, the remedy of specific performance, which is based on the discretion of the court, was not granted in this case.
Surinder Kaur (D) Tr.Lr. v. Bahadur Singh (D) Tr. Lrs. (2019)
Facts of the case
There was an agreement to sell in this case between the appellant and respondent. The possession was given to the vendee, but since there is a pending appeal regarding the said property, both parties agreed that the sale deed would be executed a month after the decision was passed in the appeal. However, the appeal was decided after 13 years from the date when the parties entered into an agreement to sell. The respondent filed a suit for specific performance, but the appellant filed an appeal stating that no such remedy must be granted to the respondent as he failed to pay the rent.
Issues involved in the case
Whether the respondent is entitled to specific performance in this case.
Judgement of the court
The Supreme Court in this case observed that the respondent had not paid any rent till the date of the suit and also denied doing so. It was noted that payment of rent was an essential element of the contract and the respondent failed to pay the rent. It was further observed that Section 16 (c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, clearly provides that a person must prove readiness and willingness to perform contractual obligations in order to be eligible for specific performance of the contract.
The court held that no such relief can be granted to the respondent merely because he is legally right but failed to prove that he is ready and willing to perform the contractual obligations. It was also observed that according to Section 20 of the Act, the court can refuse the remedy of specific performance if it becomes inequitable, and in the present case, equity is against the respondent and so he is not entitled to specific performance.
Shenbagam v. KK Rathinavel (2022)
Facts of the case
The appellants in this case who are the defendants to the suit of specific performance, entered into an agreement with the respondent to sell the property in suit for Rs. 1,25,000. The respondent who is the plaintiff paid an advance of Rs. 25,000 and agreed to pay the remaining balance within 6 months. The appellants were also asked to execute the sale deed on payment of remaining balance. The agreement also stated that the amount paid will be forfeited if the sale is not completed. It was also disclosed that the property was subject to mortgage to which the respondent agreed to discharge the same from the sale consideration. Further, the respondent paid the amount of Rs. 10,000/-. The appellants sent a legal notice to the respondent to fulfil his obligations as per the agreement.
The appellants also rescinded the contract alleging that the respondent was not ready and willing to perform his obligations. The respondent on the other hand, instituted a suit before the Principal District Munsif, Coimbatore to seek injunction against the the appellants restraining them from creating any encumbrances over the property. He also filed a suit for specific performance which was decreed in his favour. The appellants filed an appeal against the decree before the trial court which was dismissed and then preferred a second appeal in the High Court of Madras. The High Court upheld the decision of the trial court against which the present appeal was filed in the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
Issues involved in the case
Whether the respondent was ready and willing to perform his obligations mentioned in the agreement?
Judgement of the court
The Supreme Court in this case observed that it is a settled law that it is mandatory for the plaintiff to comply with the provisions of Section 16 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 even if the opposite party has not made any specific plea. Moreover, readiness and willingness to perform has to be determined from the acts or conduct of the parties. Further, the court observed that in order to decide whether a party was ready and willing to perform his part of the contract, it is necessary to determine and evaluate his conduct throughout the transaction and not only his financial capacity to perform his part. Apart from this, the other factors that must be considered are the price of property in suit and whether one party will be benefited unfairly if the decree is passed in favour of the other party.
The court held that in the present case there is total inaction on the part of the plaintiff which violated the terms of agreement. Moreover, there is a substantial rise in the prices three times between the date of agreement and date of suit. This delay resulted in a situation where it is inequitable to grant relief of specific performance to the plaintiff. The court further held that the remedy of specific performance must not be granted in a situation where it causes injustice to a party who is not at fault. Keeping in mind the conduct of the respondent (plaintiff), the court refused to grant relief of specific performance in his favour but ordered a refund of the consideration.
C. Haridasan v. Anappath Parakkattu (2023)
Facts of the case
The appellant and the respondent in this case, entered into an agreement to sell, whereby the appellant also paid the consideration amount partially. The remaining amount was to be paid within six months from the date when the document of title along with the purchase certificate was made available by the respondent. The appellant served a legal notice to respond to execute the sale deed, which the respondent refused to do and cancelled the agreement. In return, the appellant filed a suit for specific performance, wherein the trial court passed the decree in favour of the appellant but asked him to pay 25% more towards the consideration amount. Aggrieved by the order, the respondent appealed to the High Court, where the order of the trial court was set aside. Thus, the present appeal was filed by the appellant in the Supreme Court.
Issues involved in the case
Whether the specific performance can be allowed in this case.
Judgement of the court
It was argued by the respondent that the appellant was not ready and willing to perform his part and fulfil contractual obligations as no further payments were made and when asked, he was not ready to do so. The Hon’ble Supreme Court clarified that it is clear that the appellant in the present case did not prove his readiness and willingness to perform his part.
Moreover, if the suit is decreed in favour of the appellant, he would have an unfair advantage over the respondent and cause him hardships, which is against the very purpose of the remedy based on equity. This is one of the essential elements to be considered while granting specific performance of the contract. Thus, in lieu of this, the judgement of the High Court setting aside the decree of specific performance granted by the trial court was affirmed, and the appellant was not given the benefits of specific performance of the contract.
Conclusion
The doctrines of part performance and specific performance both provide remedies to innocent parties to a contract who suffer a loss due to the non-performance of the contract by the other party. The doctrine of part performance has its origins in English Law. However, unlike in India, where it is a statutory right under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, the doctrine provides equitable rights in English Law. Moreover, in order to apply the doctrine in India, it is necessary that the contracts be made in writing, but it is applicable to oral agreements as well in English law.
The doctrine of specific performance, on the other hand, provides a remedy for a party to a contract who is ready and willing to perform the contractual obligations but suffers a loss due to the other party who fails or refuses to perform any duties contained in the contract. This remedy of specific performance is contained in the Specific Relief Act, 1963, which provides the conditions under which such a remedy can be granted. In order to seek the benefits of this remedy, the plaintiff must prove that he is ready and willing to perform his part of the contract even if the other party fails or refuses to do the same. Once this is proven in court, only a decree of specific performance is granted. However, it must be noted that such a remedy is not mandatory but is discretionary in nature and depends on the discretion of the court.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Is the doctrine of part performance based on equitable principle?
Yes, the doctrine of part performance is based on an equitable principle based on the maxim “he who seeks equity must do equity”.
Can a person claim the benefits of the doctrine of part performance on the basis of unregistered documents?
No, the person cannot claim the application of the doctrine on the basis of unregistered documents. Before the amendment of 2001, such documents were acceptable to apply the doctrine but after the amendment, the doctrine cannot not be applied on the basis of unregistered documents.
Can the remedy of specific performance be granted for penal laws or public rights?
No, the remedy of specific performance can not be granted in the case of penal laws. It can only be available for enforcement of individual rights as given under Section 4 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.
What is the limitation period for specific performance?
The limitation period for the suit of specific performance is 3 years from the date fixed for performance and where no such date is fixed then the date when the plaintiff received the notice that performance is refused. This is given in Article 54 of Schedule 1 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
What is the difference between the specific performance of a contract and an injunction?
Specific performance is a remedy available to a party to a contract who suffers damages due to the other party breaching the contract. The party who breaches the contract is asked to comply with the terms and conditions of the contract and fulfil the obligation mentioned therein. Injunction on the other hand is another remedy wherein a party is prohibited from doing an act. It may be temporary or permanent.
Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:
This article is written by Abha Singhal. In this article, the author has discussed in detail the doctrine of factum valet and its applicability concerning child marriages and cases of adoption in India. Moving ahead, this article also mentions landmark judgments relating to the doctrine of factum valet for a better understanding of the readers.
Table of Contents
Introduction
One of the most prevalent forms of human rights violations in India and all over the world is the act of child marriage, especially when it relates to the marriage of a girl child. The said act is detrimental to both male and female children, but it relatively affects a female child more due to premature sexual relations leading to early pregnancies, which is extremely harmful to the overall growth and development of a child. To justify this action, the doctrine of factum valet was introduced in the country by the British, which allows child marriage to take place without any legal objections. The entry of this concept of the doctrine of factum valet in India was through the two major schools of thought under Hindu law, namely the Mitakshara school of thought and the Dayabhaga school of thought, both of which played a significant role in shaping the socio-legal system of India.
Origin and Meaning of the doctrine of factum valet
The doctrine of factum valet originated from the Roman maxim of “factum valet quod fieri dabuit,” which translates to ‘what ought not to be done becomes valid when done.’ This essentially means that once an act is accomplished and eventually completed, it will be considered valid and lawful even when it is not. It was established to justify those practices or rituals that were deemed unlawful and void. In addition to that, this doctrine is only used against the rules and acts that are directory in nature and are not mandatorily to be followed. Thus, this doctrine is considered ineffective to cure an act that is in contravention of a mandatory text. For example, if a marriage is performed without the consent of the concerned parties or their guardians, this doctrine of factum valet can be used to uphold its validity, provided it is not considered invalid or void in any statutory law, as that would make it a part of the mandatory text.
It is to be noted that, on considerations of equity, justice, and good conscience, British courts in India applied the idea of factum valet while administering Hindu law. As mentioned earlier, the reason why this maxim was brought to India was initially to justify a girl’s marriage who was given away by her parents when she was a minor. This act becomes applicable when the act of marriage of a minor girl has been performed and completed irregularly or in disregard of Hindu law.
Before the establishment of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, there was no codified Act in the country, and as a result, Dharmasastras were used to govern the same. The Dharmasastra is an ancient body of jurisprudence, containing the rules relating to interpersonal relations and the relations between the state and its people. If there was any contravention of the text, the doctrine of factum valet was used to resolve the conflict.
Schools of Hindu Law
Hindu law is considered to be the most ancient law in the world. It is believed to be around 6,000 years old. It was created by people to satisfy the needs of individuals and ensure maximum satisfaction for them. With time, there was a disparity in opinion amongst the commentators concerning the laws. By that time, various codes had been established and developed, being accepted in one part of the country but rejected by the other. Due to this contradiction and pool of varied opinions, different schools of thought emerged, out of which two major schools were:
1. Mitakhara, and
2. Dayabhaga.
Mitakshara School
The Mitakshara School of thought is believed to have been instituted by Vijnanesvara, who was a 12th-century scholar from the Dyanasty of Chanakya. The work of Vijnanesvara is also known by the name of Mitakshara, which is essentially a commentary on Yajnavalkya Smriti, which is considered one of the most sacred texts under Hindu law. The Mitakshara school of thought was believed to be primarily followed in the northern and western parts of the country.
In addition to that, the Mitakshara school of thought practices the principle of joint family property, under which all the members of the concerned family profess a right to ancestral property, and wherein the sons share an equal share in the property.
Dayabhaga School
The Dayabhaga school of thought is a school that is believed to have been established by Jimutavahana, who was also a 12th-century scholar from the province of Bengal. Jimutavahana’s work was also known by the name of Dayabhaga, a commentary on the Yajnavalkya Smriti, which is considered to be one of the most pious and heavenly texts in the eastern and southern parts of the country.
Additionally, this school recognizes the type of property wherein individual ownership prevails over joint ownership and under which the said owner has the right to dispose of the property at his/her discretion. The thing that makes the Dayabhaga school of thought more significant in shaping Indian socio-legal development is the right available to women to have an equal share of property.
Applicability of the doctrine of factum valet
Concerning child marriages
The concept of child marriage says that a marriage consisting of one or both parties being minors or having not attained the age of majority as per the legal standards of the country must commence a marriage legally. As per Indian laws, the age of majority for a boy is 21 years, and for a girl, 18 years. Marriage that takes place before the completion of the said age would be considered child marriage and, hence, void in nature. In some parts of India, specifically in rural regions, girls are usually considered a burden on families, and it is a very common misconception widely prevailing in those areas that once a girl starts to mature, she is more likely to rebel against her parent’s choices to get married, and this mainly results in early marriage.
In the case of Venkatacharyulu v. Rangacharyulu (1890), the Indian judiciary upheld the validity of child marriage on the ground that it was not a contract and said that even if a person getting married is a minor or of unsound mind, the validity of the concerned marriage cannot be determined if the marriage rituals and rites are duly followed and solemnised.
Additionally, in the case of Sivanandy v. Bhagwanthayamm (1963), the Hon’ble Madras High Court ruled that even though child marriage is prohibited by law, it cannot be challenged and declared invalid if all the ceremonial rites and rituals concerning that marriage have been duly performed by the parties. Moreover, it was also held by the court that the scope of validity of marriage is beyond the provisions of law.
For cases of adoption
The doctrine of factum valet was also applied in cases of adoption, wherein there were certain legal texts consisting of rules and procedures to be adhered to for a valid adoption to take place but which were not considered mandatory. The doctrine of factum valet was applied to justify those specific adoptions that were considered to be irregular and defective. However, the doctrine was not applied to cases consisting of cases having a clear statutory bar or prohibition against the concept of adoption.
For instance, if an adoption was to be done that was in complete contravention of the provisions of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, then the application of this said doctrine was considered to be void. Hence, the doctrine of factum valet in cases of adoption is only applicable to cases where the rules concerning the same are only directory in nature and not prohibited by any statutory regulation.
For cases dealing with Section 29(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Section 29(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, says that any Hindu marriage before the enactment of this Act, was considered valid as per the customs prevailing then, and such a marriage will not be invalidated by any subsequent changes in the legal landscape of the country. For instance, if a Hindu couple who got married in 1945 belonged to the same gotra, which is, as per law, now considered prohibited as per the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, the said marriage will not be considered void in the eyes of law. The doctrine of factum valet validates such marriages, as this doctrine essentially accepts those acts that should not have been done in the first place. As elucidated earlier, before the enactment of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, there was no codified law in the country concerning the validity of a marriage, and hence, when there was any contradiction, it got excused by the application of the doctrine of factum valet. Therefore, Section 29(1) reflects this doctrine by giving recognition and validity to such marriages that were commenced before the enactment of such an Act.
Relevance of doctrine of factum valet in the present scenario
The relevancy of the doctrine of factum valet lies in the fact that it is still used by courts to justify and validate certain actions that are in complete violation of not just Hindu law but also any statutory provision. However, this doctrine has also been contested and criticized, as it seems outdated and in complete contravention of modern principles of human rights and social justice. Moreover, it is being argued that this doctrine of factum valet is based on the psychology of patriarchal notions that seem to be in utter disregard for the autonomy and dignity of females in society. If still applied, this doctrine can be misused to a great extent to justify certain practices that go against the human rights and values of equality, justice, and good conscience, such as the practices of child marriage, dowry, sati, polygamy, female infanticide, and female foeticide, which are harmful to the growth and development of women and children and for society as a whole.
Important case laws
Sarla Mudgal v. Union of India (1995)
Facts
In this case, four petitions were filed by Hindu women against their husbands for converting to Islam and getting married again without ending their subsisting marriages. The women challenged the validity of the second marriage under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code.
Issue
Whether a Hindu husband, by converting to Islam, can enter into a second marriage without dissolving his first marriage, and whether such a marriage would be considered a valid one in the eyes of the law.
Held
The Supreme Court held that the conversion to Islam and the subsequent second marriage without dissolving the first would not be considered a valid marriage and the Hindu husband would be liable under Section 494, which penalises bigamy. The Hon’ble Court rejected the application for the doctrine of factum valet, as the second marriage was in violation of a statutory provision and was against the fundamental principle of monogamy. In addition to that, the court held that the doctrine of factum valet is not applicable in cases of marriage.
Deivanai Achi and Another v. R.M.Al.Ct. Chidambaram Chettiar And Others (1953)
Facts
A widow and widower get married according to the ceremonies adopted by the ‘Suyamariyathai cult’ or the self-respecter’s cult, which is under the auspices of the Purohit Maruppu Bugham or Anti Purohit Association. They decided to get married without following any rituals or ceremonies; all they did was convene a meeting amongst all their relatives and friends and declared that they would become husband and wife and start living together thereafter.
Issue
Whether this is a lawful marriage and whether the doctrine of factum valetcould be imposed here.
Held
In this case, the Madras High Court held that the marriage between the widow and the widower is not valid because, in the year 1967, the Hindu Marriage (Madras Amendment) Act was passed under which Section 7A was introduced into the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Section 7A laid down certain conditions to be followed for a marriage to be considered a valid one, and the said section was held to be retrospective, making this judgment come under it as well. Hence, the doctrine of factum valet could not be imposed here.
Parvathy Ammal v. Gopala Gounder and another (1956)
Facts
In this case, the petitioner Parvathy and respondent Gopala went to the temple and performed ceremonies, including the tying of thali, which is considered a symbol of marriage among Hindus but didn’t perform Sapthapathi, which is considered an essential practice as per the Shastraic rites. They got married and, after some time, got separated. The petitioner started asking for maintenance from the respondent, claiming that they were legally married.
Issue
Whether this is a legal marriage even when they didn’t perform the ceremony of Sapthapathi?
Held
The Hon’ble High Court of Madras held that the marriage was valid by applying the doctrine of factum valet. The court opined that the practice of tying thali in the community to which the petitioner and the respondent belonged was considered an equally important practice as Sapthapathi, and no evidence says that Sapthapathi was considered necessary for the marriage to be held valid.
Hem Singh And Mula Singh v. Harnam Singh And Another (1954)
Facts
In this case, the appellants, Hem Singh, and Mula Singh, were the first cousins of the respondent, Harman Singh. The respondent had no male issue and adopted Gurmej Singh by deed of adoption. The appellants challenged the validity of the deed under the customary law and contended that only near ones could be adopted since Gurmej was his collateral in the 8th degree.
Issue
Whether the adoption was valid under the customary law, and can the doctrine of factum valet be used to justify the same?
Held
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the adoption and said that the requirement of adoption of a near one is only directory in nature and not mandatory; hence, the doctrine of factum valet will be applied to justify the same.
Salekh Chand v. Satya Gupta And Others (2008)
Facts
The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India was hearing a civil appeal involving a disagreement over who should own the house that the four brothers inherited. Om Prakash and Salekh Chand, the plaintiffs in this case, stated that they had bought one-fourth of the land from Chandra, the widow of one of the four brothers who had passed away without any problems. The defendants, Satya Gupta, and others, on the other hand, disputed the legality of the sale deed, claiming that Brijesh Kumar was the only successor to Chandra Bhan and that Bhan had adopted Brijesh Kumar, the brother of another brother, Battu.
Issue
The issue before this Hon’ble Court was whether the adoption of Brijesh by Chandra Bhan was valid and justified under Hindu law and whether the doctrine of factum valet was applied to make this valid or not.
Held
The Hon’ble Court held in this case that the adoption of Brijesh Kumar by Chandra Bhan was deemed invalid in the eyes of the law as it was contrary to the mandatory texts of Hindu law that prohibit the adoption of a sister’s son. Moreover, the Court also held that the doctrine of factum valet could not be applied to cases that were in direct contravention of the provisions of the mandatory texts. The Hon’ble Court, hence, upheld the validity of the sale deed executed by the widow of Chandra Bhan in favour of the plaintiffs and thereby dismissed the appeal of the defendants.
Conclusion
The doctrine of factum valet is a principle of Hindu law that justifies an act that should not have been justified in the first place. In the modern day, when specific legislation has been established for acts to maintain and uphold the values of equity, justice, and good conscience, the relevancy of the doctrine of factum valet is in question. It has been challenged and criticised for violating human rights, affecting females at the worst, such as in the cases of child marriage, which is a gross violation of human rights, severely affecting the overall psychological and physical development of a child, and leading to grave injustices that were bestowed upon innocents in Indian society. Therefore, being a complex and controversial concept, there is a need to examine it in light of modern scenarios, keeping in mind the social and legal norms that are attached to it.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
How did the British courts apply the doctrine of factum valet in enforcing Hindu law in India?
The British courts applied the doctrine of factum valet, keeping in mind the principles of equity, justice, and good conscience. The Britishers respected the traditions and customs of Hindu law, and only applied this doctrine to the directory texts and not the mandatory ones in the country.
How did the codification of the various laws under Hindu law affect the doctrine of factum valet?
The codification of laws such as-
The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955;
The Hindu Succession Act, 1956; and
The Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956,
reduced the relevancy of the doctrine of factum valet. It is so because the codified laws laid down specific rules for the various aspects of Hindu law, making them mandatory to be followed, thus making the doctrine of factum valet invalid.
What are the criticisms of the doctrine of factum valet?
The doctrine of factum valet is against the principles of morality, social welfare, and justice, as it validates those acts that are immoral, illegal, or harmful to society at large. Moreover, it is inconsistent since it applies only to certain aspects of Hindu law. It is based on the rigid interpretation of Hindu law texts, ignoring the purpose and spirit behind them.
How is the doctrine of factum valet applicable to marriages under Hindu law?
The doctrine of factum valet is applicable to marriages under Hindu law that are performed irregularly or without adhering to the ceremonial rites and requirements as prescribed by the mandatory texts enshrined in the Hindu scriptures. Moreover, the doctrine of factum valet declares that once a marriage is done and consummated, it is to be considered valid in nature even if it is entered into without performing the rites and rituals or without the consent of the parties involved thereto. However, it is to be noted that this doctrine of factum valet does not apply to marriages that are prohibited by the mandatory or essential texts of Hindu law, such as marriages within the prohibited degrees of a relationship or marriages consummated between persons of distinct castes.
What is the difference between directory texts and mandatory texts under Hindu law?
The difference between a directory and mandatory texts under Hindu law is that the directory texts are, as the name suggests, a directory in nature and are optional and recommendary rules or principles of Hindu law. On the other hand, mandatory texts are those texts that prescribe essential or obligatory rules of Hindu law, such as the rule of prohibition of incestuous marriages under Hindu law.
What are the consequences of applying or not applying the doctrine of factum valet to an act that is in direct contravention of Hindu law?
If the doctrine of factum valet is applied to an act that is in violation of the mandatory texts as mentioned under Hindu law, the act becomes legally binding and effective. On the other hand, if the doctrine of factum valet is not applied to an act done in complete contravention of Hindu law, the act is invalidated and becomes null and void in the eyes of the law.
What are the sources of Hindu law that govern the validity of marriage and adoption acts?
The sources of Hindu law that govern the validity of acts such as marriage and adoption are the ancient scriptures, such as the Smritis, the Vedas, the Dharamsutras, and the Dharmashastras. Moreover, other sources such as customs and usages (like the local, tribal, family, and caste-related customs), digests and commentaries such as Dayabhaga and Mitakshara, judicial precedents, and statutory legislation such as the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956; and the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.
What are certain factors that determine whether the doctrine of factum valet can be invoked or not in a given case?
The factors that determine whether the doctrine of factum valet can be invoked in a given circumstance are the nature and extent of the violation of the principles of Hindu law, the consent of the parties involved in the case, the intention of the parties involved, the effect and consequences of the act on the interests and rights of others, public health and morality, and parameters such as equity, justice, and good conscience.
What are the possible effects of the doctrine of factum valet on child marriages in India?
The doctrine of factum valet is applied to uphold the validity of such child marriages under Hindu law that are detrimental to the rights and welfare of the children, especially girl children in India. Additionally, child marriages lead to premature sexual relations, health risks, a lack of education and employment opportunities, and many more. Importantly, the doctrine of factum valet ignores the consent and well-being of the children being subjected to child marriages, thus harming the rights of children in the country.
How does the concept of the doctrine of factum valet relate to the concepts of equity, justice, and good conscience?
The doctrine of factum valet relates to the concepts of equity, justice, and good conscience by providing and enabling a flexible approach to the application of Hindu law. The doctrine of factum valet acknowledges the social and political realities of the country under Hindu law and tries to avoid hardships for the parties involved in a case that is being done in direct contravention to the mandatory or essential texts under Hindu law. Additionally, the doctrine of factum valet also tries to strike a balance between the interests of the individual and the interests of the community under Hindu law.
What are the possible alternatives to the doctrine of factum valet?
The alternatives to the doctrine of factum valet under Hindu law are the doctrines of void and voidable acts. The doctrine of void acts states that any act that is done in contravention of the essential or mandatory texts under Hindu law is null and void and has no legal effect. On the other hand, the doctrine of voidable acts states that such acts that are done in contravention or violation of any directory or non-mandatory texts of Hindu law are valid in the eyes of the law, but only till the time they are not being challenged and set aside by any competent judicial authority.
What are the challenges of the doctrine of factum valet in contemporary Hindu society?
The prospects and challenges of the doctrine of factum valet are that this doctrine faces the issue of adapting to the changing norms and rules of Hindu society, as influenced by factors such as health, education, modernization, urbanization, and globalisation. It also faces the challenge of harmonizing with the statutory laws of the country, which are based on the values of justice, equality, and harmony. Moreover, the doctrine of factum valet faces the issue of preserving and promoting the human rights of women and children in a rapidly evolving Indian society.
Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:
Good governance is something everyone wishes for. The advancement created in technology, the social needs of people, the economic concerns of the masses, the determination of rights and responsibilities of citizens, the adoption of culture and living in accordance with customs are all important aspects of human life that need to be protected, regulated, preserved, and promoted as per the interests and wills of the people required in the ordinary course of life. Democratic government is a form of governance that represents the will of the people in a political, social, and economic atmosphere.
There are various forms of government that states are practising; however, in all of them, the democratic form of government is well accepted by the masses because it guarantees the wills and interests of the people. Democracy, in simple words, can be defined as ‘indirect engagement of the masses in the governance of laws and policies’, or “administration by the people.”
What is democracy
The word democracy is derived from the Greek words ‘demos’ and ‘kratia’,’ which mean rule of the people. It is a form of government where people elect their representative by way of a timely electoral process. In such a process, the majority holds power. The democratic form of government follows and observes the rule of law and the will of the people in administrative work. The people are guaranteed free speech and expression, personal liberty, and the right to form political associations.
Primarily, the democratic government functions in the shared interests of the people and does not allow the whole power to be given to a particular group of politicians to run the government, as such things happen in monarchies and dictatorships.
Constitutionally, there must be a separation of power between the organs of the government so that one cannot influence another, and each organ of the government works conventionally and conveniently without any influence.
Characteristics of democracy
A democratic government should have the following characteristics;
Rule of Law
The supremacy of the law is one of the fundamental features of democracy. People, including political figures, must observe the supremacy of the law during the course of their lives. Everyone is considered equal before the law. Every individual remains under constitutional obligation to observe the law as a supreme command of the state, and no one can escape from the law.
Equality
One of the necessary aspects of democracy is equality. Equality brings fairness among the people; it also helps create a balance between powerful people and weaker sections. There are constitutional restrictions on the state to observe and treat every citizen equally, without any discrimination based on race, caste, religion, sex, language, script, culture or any of them.
Fundamental rights
In a democracy, it is the duty of the government to make constitutional provisions to guarantee some sorts of rights, such as fundamental rights as well as human rights that are inalienable. Fundamental freedoms are sin qua non to live a dignified life. The fundamental freedoms play a pivotal role in giving the state the negative impression that the state cannot violate the fundamental rights and cannot encroach upon the personal liberties of individuals and in cases of violation of rights and encroachment upon those rights, there is a remedy to enforce those rights. Fundamental rights also prevent the establishment of authoritarian rule in the state. These rights are essential for the overall development of individuals and the state at the global level.
Judiciary
The judiciary is one of the most important organs of government in a democracy. The judiciary functions independently without being influenced by any other organ of the state. The judiciary ensures the supremacy of the law and protects individuals from exploitation and violations of their rights. It guarantees that each organ of the state should function within their constitutional limits and not transgress beyond their limits and each organ of the government should not go beyond what they are not entitled to. Thus, it creates constitutional boundaries and sets up constitutional guidelines for each and every administrative work of the government.
Civic education
Education empowers common people and makes them eligible to decide what is legitimate and what is not, what is correct for society at large and what is not. They became capable of understanding the overall development of the nation. Thus, it is necessary to create such an education system to provide education to all. If the people were educated, they would be able to contribute to the development of the nation. People can successively participate in political activities and social activities, among other things, by getting educated. Importantly, civic education teaches how the legislative, executive and judiciary function together to make policies, rules and laws for citizens without interfering in each other’s work and processes. Thus, they make checks and balances.
Theories of democracy
Classical theory
Athens was the first city-state in which democracy was practised, popularly known as classical/direct democracy or Athenian democracy. of Athens directly participated in the decision making process and the process of legislation.
The main ideals of classical democracy are:
Equal opportunity and equality among all the people;
Respect for laws and liberty of individuals;
Direct participation of all people in policy making and legislative works;
A fair and transparent voting system; and
Rights and privileges of individuals.
The Ekklesia
In Athenian democracy, there were three important institutions. One of them was ekklesia, which is also known as assembly. Each and every adult citizen was welcomed at Ekklesia for attending the meeting. The meeting was held 40 times a year in a hillside auditorium west of Acropolis.
They discuss new policies, laws, war related decisions, and foreign policies, and if they consider that there is a need to amend the existing laws, they amend them with the consultation of the members attending the meeting. The group made the decision by a simple majority vote.
The Boule
A council consisting of 500 adult citizens, 50 from each of the ten Athenian tribes, acted as the executive of the committee and they were elected for a year. Unlike Ekklesia, the committee would meet every day to discuss and supervise navy ships (trireme) and army horses. The committee also dealt with the representatives of other city-states. It also helped to decide important matters to be decided by Ekklesia at the earliest possible time.
The Dikasteria
The third important institution was Dikasteria, or “jury.” The jurors were chosen by lot and there were over 30 males. Of all the democratic institutions, Aristotle argued that the Dikasteria “contributed most to the strength of democracy” because the jury had almost unlimited power.
In Athens, there was no police system. The people of Athens could come with their cases to Dikastera and sue the culprits, and the majority of jurors would decide the case. There was certainty as to what kind of case could be brought before the Dikasteria and what kind of case could not be. Thus, it became the practise that all small and large cases were brought to be decided. Jurors were getting paid too.
All adult people were bound to actively participate in the government and legislative process; even if any adult used to neglect and abstain from participating in the government, such a person was fined. They had different concepts to recognise and treat as citizens. Only adult males were considered citizens; females, children and slaves were not considered citizens and therefore they could not render votes.
All citizens were free to express their views and debate the policies, as well as to render their vote in a systemized manner called classical democracy.
Protective democracy
Protective democracy as right based democracy emerged during the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries.
According to Heywood, “democracy was seen less as a mechanism through which the public could participate in political life, and more as a device through which citizens could protect themselves from encroachment of the government, hence protective democracy.”
In a protective democracy, people intend to protect their civil liberties and human rights, or it can be said that people created a secure and protected environment for their well being by way of a protective democracy. Plato supposed that the rule of the guardian class could serve the purpose properly. But Aristotle inquired, Who will guard the guardians? From all these ideas, protective democracy emerged.
The English thinker John Locke was considered one of the great advocates of protective democracy. He pointed out that a citizen’s freedom and right to vote were based on existence rights characterised as life, property and liberty, and the right to life and liberty guarantees the pursuit of happiness.
J. Bentham, J. Stuart Mill, and J. Mills all powerfully advocated the idea of protective democracy. The concept of utilitarianism proposes that the rights and liberty of individuals be protected at any cost because these are the core principles of a democracy. It was argued that democracy is the best form of government that can protect these fundamentals of human beings.
The characteristics of Protective Democracy
The characteristics of protective democracy are:
Protective democracy believes in popular sovereignty; however, people cannot participate directly in the decision making process; they choose representatives to be governed.
Popular sovereignty and representative democracy are both legitimate forms of government.
The duty of the government to protect the rights and liberty of individuals is inconsistent with the fact that the government strongly establishes whether or not these civil liberties must be protected.
The officials are held accountable for every action related to legislative processes; people are responsible for holding the government officials accountable for their office based acts.
The important aspect of protective democracy was the distribution of power among the organs of the government. It will create a check and balance of authority over the other.
The constitution is the main source of power. All subjects must give themselves the principles of the Constitution to govern their daily lives.
Organisation or association of a group of people to create a more social way of life and raise voice for violations of any rights.
Fair and transparent election competition among the political parties.
Marxist theory of democracy
Marxist’s views on democracy are based on the social structure of class analysis. It opined that society is divided into two classes; the capitalist class, which owns the property, ‘bourgeois’ and the working class, which owns nothing but does labour all the time, ‘proletarait’. The theory suggests that political power should be in such a position to challenge the exploitations made by the capitalist class, and politics has the duty to protect against such exploitation. It does say that bourgeois democracy is a shame and fake because it does not achieve the goal; it only works for a specific class of people. Marxists strongly advocated that there are economic rights for individuals to establish socialist democracy.
According to Marxists, in bourgeois democracy, the state is controlled by the economic elites-the finance capital. The members of this class, by occupying key posts in different branches of the power structure, use the government to promote the interests of their class. The Marxist theory emphasises the importance of economic factors as the main reason for division of class and control of ownership and property. It proposes that by way of education, the labour class along with political persons may create a democratic road to socialist society, which will remove class exploitation within the democratic government.
Characteristics of Marxist Democracy
Characteristics of Marxist democracy are:
bourgeois;
Working class;
Socialist democracy is the solution of this division;
It opposes liberal democracy;
Education as a mean to achieve success; and
Emphasis should be given to the economic rights of Individuals.
Elitist theory of democracy
During the twentieth century, thinkers started to think of contemporary democratic forms that can be practised or are in existence but are far away from being recognised as a form of government.
The first time such theories emerged after WWII, their main contributors were Vilfredo Pareto, Geatano Mosca, Robert Michels and American authors like James Burnham and C.W. Mills. The term elite is used to describe a minority among the people who are in an advantageous position in that community due to some factors like belonging to powerful people or having disproportionate power in political affairs within the community.
Elite theory suggests that society is always controlled and governed by minority groups who are superior to others. This theory suggests that there are two kinds of people: the ‘special selected few’, or ‘Elite’, and the mass of people who do not have any quality. The elite particularly enjoys power through politics and monopolises the distribution of wealth and opportunity among the people. Robert Michaels, who gave what is known as the ‘iron law of oligarchy,’ claimed the non-elite should submit to the elite because the majority of human beings are ‘apathetic’, indolent, slavish and permanently incapable of self-government.
Features of elitist democracy
Features of elitist democracy are:
People are not equal in their abilities and the development of elite and non-elite is inevitable.
The elite can control power and command influence because of their superior abilities.
The group of elites is not constant and there is constant entry of new people and exit of old people from the group.
The majority of the masses who constitute the non-elite are apathetic, lazy and indifferent, and so there is a need for a capable minority to provide leadership.
The ruling elite in modern times are mainly intellectuals, industrial managers or bureaucrats.
Pluralist theory of democracy
In Marxist theory and elite theory, both propose that power vests in the hands of few and majority is not capable of holding power due to being inferior and not having control of ownership or belonging to any dominion group. Pluralist theory is different from both of these theories. It suggests that power does not vest in a minority group but there is a distribution of power. There are such organisations and associations within the state that are distributing power. Such organisations also shape and alter the decisions of the government when they are needed. These groups are politically active groups that interfere in political matters whenever needed and raise socio-economic and socio-political issues at large.
Robert Dahl and Lovenstien are the main advocates of pluralist theory. R. Dahl used the word ‘polyarchy’ to describe pluralist democracy and Lovenstien used the term ‘polycracy’ to define pluralist theory.
Characteristics of pluralist theory of democracy
Characteristics of the pluralist theory of democracy:
The basis of society is a group, not an individual. If an individual participates in any political activity, he is not alone in it; there is a group of people who also participate in the same political activity.
Pluralists suggest the structure of society is federal.
It also supports multi party systems. So that there is a fair and competitive electoral system.
It promotes the independence of the judiciary. An impartial and independent judiciary is the key to democracy.
Decentralisation of power.
It supports the notion of a limited state.
Conclusion
Democracy, or the process of government, is a continuing, ever evolving and growing process. There is no universal definition of democracy where scholars and political thinkers, even jurists, come to a single point and collectively conclude that this is the best form of government. With the development of mass communication and technology, we are also witnessing virtual democracy, which is an infant now. Till now, everyone agrees that unless and until there is free speech and fair and transparent legislative work is done and adopted, such a kind of governance is good. Thus, democracy is considered a good form of government in today’s society.
Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:
The article is authored by Stuti Mehrotra. This article discusses the Doctrine of Occupied Field and Doctrine of Repugnancy in detail. In this article, I will be giving an overview of both doctrines, along with their essentials and importance, as well as the differences between them.
Table of Contents
Introduction
The term occupied field refers to a field that is already occupied. In the legal world, we can say that when any subject matter has already been covered by some legislation or provision of any statute, and some other statute also tries to cover that subject matter from a different aspect, then the doctrine of occupied field comes into play.
The doctrine of occupied field provides that if an Act of the Parliament occupies a subject over which the State Legislature is also empowered to legislate and has also legislated and the State’s Legislation obstructs the operation of the Parliament’s Act, then the State’s Legislation is inconsistent with the Parliament’s Act to the extent of the provision/s that obstruct the latter’s operation.
The Doctrine of Repugnancy is a simple doctrine used to check the validity of state laws with obligation to the central laws. The doctrine of repugnancy ensures uniformity and consistency in laws across the nation. It provides a clear mechanism to solve the conflict between the state laws and the central laws.
What is the doctrine of occupied field
The Doctrine of Occupied Field is a legal principle in Constitutional Law that deals with the distribution of powers to the government at different levels within a federal system. It essentially means that if a particular subject matter or field is exclusively occupied by legislation at one level of government, i.e., either central or state, then the other level of government cannot legislate on the same subject matter. This doctrine helps avoid conflicts and overlaps in legislative authority.
Article 254 of the Constitution of India states the provisions and measures regarding inconsistency between laws made by Parliament and laws made by the State Legislatures. Article 254 addresses the relationship between Union and state laws on concurrent list subjects by providing a framework for resolving conflicts by giving precedence to Union laws if they have received the President’s approval. This aligns with the concept of Indian federalism in the doctrine.
Article 254 of the Constitution of India deals with the concept of inconsistency between laws made by the central government and the laws made by the state governments on matters that are in the Concurrent List of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution. Article 254 of the Indian Constitution addresses what happens when there is a conflict between laws created by the national government and those made by the state governments on certain topics that both levels of government have the authority to legislate on.
In simple terms, when there is a disagreement between a law passed by the national or central government and a law passed by a state government, and both laws are related to subjects listed in the Concurrent List of the Constitution, the national law usually prevails.
The doctrine of occupied field provides that if an Act of the Parliament occupies a subject over which the State Legislature is also empowered to legislate and has also legislated and the State’s Legislation obstructs the operation of the Parliament’s Act, then the State’s Legislation is inconsistent with the Parliament’s Act to the extent of the provision/s which obstruct the latter’s operation.
Under this topic, it is essential to briefly understand the concept of federalism in India and the legislative relations of the centre and state.
Concept of Federalism in India
Federalism is a system of government in which the powers are divided between a central government and smaller political units, typically states. The concept of federalism is often used to strike a balance between strong centralized authority and regional autonomy, or self-governance. This concept has been adopted by many countries around the world, and one of them is India.
Legislative relations of the Centre and State
In India, the legislative relations between the Centre (the national or federal government) and the States (the regional or provincial governments) are governed by the principles of federalism as enshrined in the Constitution of India. There are legislative relations between the state and the central government, and the doctrine of occupied field helps in maintaining a division between the law-making powers of the state and the centre.
The legislative framework in India is established in Part XI (Articles 245–255) of the Indian Constitution, which deals with the distribution of legislative powers between the Union (Centre) and the States as well as the framework related to resolving disputes related to these powers.
Seventh Schedule of the Indian Constitution
The 7th Schedule of the Indian Constitution enumerates the division of powers and responsibilities between the Union (centre) and the state. The 7th schedule has three lists, namely, the Union list, State list, and Concurrent list, that show the division of power between the Union and States concerning certain subjects. The Union List has a total of 97 subjects, the State List has 66 subjects, and the Concurrent List has 47 Subjects.
Union List
The Union List is a list of 97 subject-numbered items as provided in the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India. The Union Government, or Parliament of India, has exclusive power to legislate on matters relating to these items. The doctrine of occupied field is found in Entry 52, List I
State List
The State List is a list of 66 subjects in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India. The respective state governments have exclusive power to legislate on matters relating to these items.
Concurrent List
There are 47 items currently on the list, including items that are under the joint domain of the Union as well as the respective States. However, once the Parliament makes any law on the subject of concurrent list, then the state legislative assemblies can’t make any law on that particular subject. It basically excludes the legislative jurisdiction of the state assemblies.
Power of Parliament to legislate state subjects
In India, Parliament has the power to legislate on subjects that fall within the State List (List II) under specific circumstances as provided for in the Indian Constitution. This is known as the power of Parliament to legislate on State subjects, and it is outlined in Article 249 and Article 250 of the Constitution.
Article 249 of the Constitution of India provides a mechanism for the Parliament of India to legislate on subjects that are typically under the jurisdiction of individual states. In simpler terms, it allows the central government to make laws on certain matters that would usually fall within the authority of state governments.
Article 249 enables the Indian Parliament to create laws on specific topics, even if those topics are usually handled by state governments. This happens when the Rajya Sabha, the Upper House of Parliament, passes a resolution by a two-thirds majority, stating that it’s necessary for the national interest to have a uniform law on a particular subject. Once such a resolution is approved, Parliament can make laws on that subject, and these laws will be binding on all states, overriding any conflicting state laws. This provision helps maintain consistency and address issues that require a nationwide approach.
Article 250 of the Constitution of India empowers the Parliament to make laws on matters listed in the State List if the Rajya Sabha, the upper house of Parliament, passes a resolution by a two-thirds majority that it is necessary to do so in the national interest. In simpler terms, it allows the central government to legislate on subjects that are typically under the authority of state governments when certain conditions are met.
Article 250 of the Indian Constitution grants the Parliament special authority. It allows the central government to create laws related to topics that are usually the responsibility of the state governments. However, there’s a condition, this can only happen if the Rajya Sabha agrees with a two-thirds majority vote, and they believe it’s necessary for the greater good of the nation.
National interest in general means the interest of the nation or country as a whole, not individually or as an individual group. Governments make decisions and make policies, all for the national interest. In a democratic country like India, it becomes a little difficult to explain what can be done in the national interest because if there is an excessive infringement of rights by the government to protect the national interest of the country, the government will be considered an authoritative government.
Any offence committed against an individual, society, or the Government does ultimately harm the nation, but we have separate provisions of criminal laws for every crime under which they must be registered.
Under criminal law, one such example of a law passed in the national interest is a law against sedition under Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (“IPC”). The Section states that any person, whoever, by words, either spoken or written, or by any sign or by visible representation, or otherwise, brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards the Government established by law in India, will be charged under Sedition and shall be punished with imprisonment for life and a fine, or with imprisonment that may be extended up to 3 years and a fine, or only with a fine.
Examples of doctrine of occupied field
The doctrine of occupied field is found in Entry 52, List I, and Entry 24, List II, which, when read together, state that the Parliament can make laws to exercise control of certain industries in the public interest, which would render those industries out of the legislative power of the State Legislatures. Further, Entry 7, List I, provides that the Parliament has the competence to legislate over industries necessary in relation to the defense or prosecution of war. The doctrine provides a basis for the Parliament to legislate on matters related to mines and minerals, higher education, regulation of ports, etc.
Certainly, there are examples where this principle has been applied. Some such examples are mentioned below-
Education
It is primarily a subject within the domain of the State Government, but the Central Government can also legislate on certain aspects of education, but it cannot encroach on the fields occupied by the state. This can be seen in the case ofT.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka (2000)which has been discussed later in the article.
Healthcare
It’s primarily a state subject, and it is the duty of the state to take responsibility of the different aspects related to healthcare. However, the Central Government can make laws relating to healthcare.
Public order
Maintenance of public order has been listed in the state list of the Constitution of India, while the Central Government can provide assistance to the state in matters relating to state government.
Agriculture
Agriculture is mainly a state subject and the State government has the authority to make and amend laws on matters relating to agriculture, land, and irrigation. However, the Central government also made laws on the same matter, but it should make sure to not encroach on the fields occupied by the state.
Essentials of doctrine of occupied field
While reading about the Doctrine of Occupied Fields, we came to know how important this doctrine is to avoid the conflict between the state and central laws. This doctrine also has some essentials that will help us understand it better. Let’s delve into the essentials of the Doctrine of Occupied Fields.
Enumerated powers
The Constitution must specify and distinguish the powers and responsibilities of each level of both the state and the central government. In the absence of a specific distribution of powers, the doctrine may not apply.
Exclusive legislation
The doctrine comes into play when a particular field or subject matter falls within the exclusive legislative competence of one level of government, which means that the other level of government cannot legislate on that subject matter.
Intent of the Constitution
The doctrine is often based on the intent of the Constitution. If it is clear that the constitution intended for one level of government to have exclusive authority over a particular field, the doctrine applies. It means that if the Constitution empowers either the central or state government to make laws in a particular field and the other government tries to interfere in making laws in that particular field, the doctrine of occupied field applies.
Importance of doctrine of occupied field
A doctrine that prevents the conflict of powers between the state and central government is surely of importance in the legal world. So, let’s study its importance with a few pointers.
Protecting the legislative intent
The doctrine helps in protecting the intent of the legislature by clearly establishing separate powers for the union and the state government so that they don’t overlap each other’s powers and also do not interfere with each other’s subject matters.
Balancing the interest between Parliament and State Assemblies
It helps balance the interests of Parliament and State Assemblies by striking a balance between the powers of the government at both levels. By clearly establishing separate powers for the union and the state government so that they don’t interfere with each other’s interests and powers, the doctrine helps balance the interests between the parliament and the state assemblies.
Avoiding conflict
It helps prevent conflicts and legal disputes between different levels of government by clearly stating their areas of legislative authority.
Efficiency
By assigning exclusive authority over certain subject matters, it ensures that one level of government can efficiently legislate and regulate in those areas without interference from the government at another level.
Clarity
It provides basic clarity and predictability in the legal framework for the government, making it easier for citizens and businesses to understand and comply with laws at both levels.
What is the doctrine of repugnancy
The doctrine of repugnancy is a simple doctrine used to check the validity of state laws with obligation to federal laws. The doctrine of repugnancy ensures uniformity and consistency in laws across the nation. It provides a clear mechanism to solve the conflict between the state laws and the central laws.
Test of repugnancy
This doctrine is primarily used to check the validity of laws and powers authorized by the government at different levels. The test for repugnancy can be classified as follows –
Direct conflict
The doctrine applies when there is a direct conflict between a central law and a state law. This conflict can be in terms of substance, objectives, or the ability to comply with both laws simultaneously and the concerned subject matter.
Occupied field
If a particular field or subject matter is exclusively occupied by central legislation, any state law on that subject matter will be considered repugnant.
Inconsistency
The state law must be inconsistent with the central law for the doctrine to apply. Inconsistency can arise from a contradiction between the provisions or objectives of the laws.
Importance of the doctrine of repugnancy
Just like the Doctrine of Occupied Fields has some importance, this doctrine also has its own importance since it provides a mechanism for the Doctrine of Occupied Fields to work.
Maintaining uniformity
In a federal system like India, where both the central and state governments have legislative authority, the doctrine of repugnancy ensures uniformity and consistency in laws across the nation. It prevents situations where different states may have conflicting regulations on the same subject, making it easier for businesses and individuals to operate seamlessly across state boundaries.
Resolution of conflict
It provides a clear mechanism for resolving conflicts between central and state laws. When there is an inconsistency, the central law prevails, eliminating ambiguity and legal uncertainty.
Preservation of federal supremacy
The doctrine upholds the principle of federal supremacy, ensuring that federal laws take precedence in areas where both the central and state governments have legislative authority. This is essential for maintaining the integrity of the federal structure.
Protection of Fundamental Rights
The doctrine of repugnancy can also be invoked when state laws infringe upon fundamental rights guaranteed by the Indian Constitution. This ensures that individual rights are protected uniformly across the country.
Difference between doctrine of occupied field and repugnancy
Serial no.
Basis
Doctrine of occupied field
Doctrine of repugnancy
Nature
It deals with the exclusive legislative competence of one level of government on a specific subject matter.
It addresses conflicts between federal and state laws on the same subject matter.
Scope
It operates within the framework of enumerated powers and the exclusive authority of one level of government.
It focuses on the inconsistency or conflict between specific federal and state laws.
Application
It prevents the other level of government from legislating in the field already occupied.
It resolves conflicts when both levels of government have legislated on the same subject.
Constitutional Basis
It is based on the division of powers specified in the Constitution.
It is based on the principle of federal supremacy.
Purpose
It aims to avoid legislative duplication and conflicts by specifying exclusive legislative competence.
It aims to resolve conflicts that arise due to inconsistent or contradictory laws enacted by different levels of government.
Example
Matters related to foreign affairs, national defense, and currency are typically occupied by the central government in India.
If a state law seeks to regulate a subject that is already governed by a federal law and there is an inconsistency between the two, the doctrine of repugnancy comes into play.
In summary, the Doctrine of Occupied Field deals with exclusive legislative competence, while the doctrine of repugnancy addresses conflicts between federal and state laws. Both doctrines are crucial to maintaining the integrity and harmony of a federal system by providing a framework to resolve conflicts and allocate legislative powers.
Landmark judgments
The State of Bombay v. the United Motors (India) Ltd. (1953)
Facts
In this case, the respondent was involved in selling motor vehicles in the state of Bombay (now Maharashtra). The state government imposed a tax on the sale of motor vehicles, arguing it was distinct from the central government’s taxation on the sale of goods. The central issue was whether the state’s tax conflicted with the central government’s power to tax the sale of goods under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, leading to a dispute over the occupied field doctrine.
Issues raised
The central issue before the court was whether the state government had the power to levy a tax on the sale of motor vehicles and, if so, whether it conflicted with the central government’s power to tax the sale of goods under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.
Judgment
It was held by the Supreme Court that the field of taxation on the sale of goods was occupied by the central government, and thus, imposing tax on the sale of goods by the state government was declared unconstitutional.
S.R. Bommai v. Union Of India (1994)
Facts
In this case, the central government dissolved the state government in Karnataka, alleging a constitutional breakdown. The dismissal was done under Article 356 of the Constitution of India. According to Article 356 of the Constitution of India, the President, on the basis of a report from the Governor of a State, can promulgate a constitutional emergency if he is satisfied that the administration of the State cannot be carried on in accordance with constitutional provisions. After that, the President may assume all or any of the functions of the State Government, which can be termed a constitutional breakdown.
Issues raised
Whether the imposition of the President’s rule on the basis of alleged constitutional breakdown is justified?
Whether the court could review the President’s rule?
Judgment
It was held by the Supreme Court that the President’s rule could be judicially reviewed and should not be imposed in cases of constitutional breakdown. The court affirmed that the imposition of the President’s Rule is subject to judicial review because it involves a potential violation of the basic structure and principles of the Indian Constitution. The court recognized that the power to impose the President’s Rule was not absolute and unbridled. It could not be exercised arbitrarily or for political reasons. Instead, it could only be invoked in situations where the constitutional machinery in a state had broken down.
T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka (2002)
Facts
In this case, the regulation of admissions and fees at private, unaided universities was questioned. T.M.A. Pai Foundation was an organization that ran several educational institutions, like engineering colleges and medical colleges, in the State of Karnataka. The State of Karnataka had enacted the Karnataka Professional Colleges Regulation of Admission and Determination of Fee Act, 2000, which sought to regulate the admission process and fee structure in private professional colleges, including those run by trusts like the T.M.A. Pai Foundation.
The Act established a regulatory authority that had the power to oversee admissions, fee fixation, and other aspects of private professional colleges, which was challenged by the plaintiffs on the ground that it violates the autonomy of the college and violates the fundamental right under Article 19(1)(g) and Article 26.
Issues raised
Whether the state government has the authority to regulate admission in private, unaided colleges? If so, does it violate the autonomy of the college?
Judgment
It was held by the Supreme Court that education is primarily a state subject and the state government can regulate admission in unaided colleges, but while doing so, it should keep in mind that it should not affect the autonomy of any such institution.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we can say that both the doctrine of occupied fields and the doctrine of repugnancy play crucial roles in federal systems. Both doctrines operate in different contexts. The Doctrine of Occupied Field focuses on delineating exclusive legislative competence, while the doctrine of repugnancy addresses conflicts between laws enacted by different levels of government, upholding the principle of federal supremacy and ensuring uniformity and consistency in laws across the nation.
The Doctrine of Occupied Field is a legal principle in constitutional law that deals with the distribution of powers to the government at different levels within a federal system. The doctrine of repugnancy is a simple doctrine used to check the validity of state laws with obligations to federal laws.
These doctrines are important to maintain the flow of power between the government’s different levels and to avoid conflict at any level.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What role does the Doctrine of occupied fields play?
Doctrine of occupied fields separates the legal powers of the government at the central and state levels.
What role does the Doctrine of repugnancy play?
The doctrine of repugnancy is used to check the validity of laws and powers authorized to the government at different levels.
How are both doctrines different?
The Doctrine of Occupied Field deals with matters related to foreign affairs, national defense, and currency that are typically occupied by the central government in India, while the doctrine of repugnancy comes into play if a state law seeks to regulate a subject that is already governed by federal law, and there is an inconsistency between the two.
Which one of the two doctrines is more important?
Both doctrines are equally important in a federal country like India, as the doctrine of occupied fields separates the legal powers of the government at the central and state levels, while the doctrine of repugnancy is used to check the validity of laws and powers authorized to the government at different levels.
References
Constitution of India by P.M. Bakshi 18th Edition 2021
Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.
LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join: