Download Now
Home Blog Page 217

How to market your law firm

0

Law is fiercely competitive, and it can be tough to stand out above the crowd as a law firm. Finding new clients and getting referrals isn’t always as easy as it seems, and it can take years to build a name for yourself in the industry.

But it’s not all doom and gloom! It’s completely possible to succeed as a law firm. With an effective marking strategy and the best digital tools, you can experience the success that you deserve. There are always people out there who are searching for expert lawyers to help them with legal issues, and with the right marketing techniques, you can drive more of these people to your law firm.

Below, we’ve got lots of top tips to help you market your law firm and experience industry-wide success.

Take the help of a marketing company

Hiring specialist marketers in your particular field of law could be the answer to the perfect marketing strategy. For example, if your firm comprises personal injury attorneys, consider recruiting experts at a personal injury digital marketing company.

With professional marketing services, you can relax knowing that you’re in the best hands. Even if you have no prior knowledge of marketing, the expert team will guide you through the process of creating and maintaining an effective promotional strategy that attracts your ideal clients. They’ll work closely with you to monitor your strategy and make the necessary changes to boost your long-term success.

Create a professional website

Nowadays, most people will take to the Internet when in search of an expert lawyer. Building a site that looks clean and professional and contains all of the important information about your law firm, maximizes the chances of potential clients choosing your company over one of your competitors.

You’ll need to make sure that your website is search engine optimized to increase your online visibility. Including lots of industry-related keywords (long tail and short tail) in your website copy will increase your rankings on search engine results pages and place your site near the top, where more people will come across it.

If you have no idea where to start when it comes to building a website for your law firm, contact a professional web developer to help you. They’ll also be able to help you with creating a law app for your brand.

It’s better to pay for an expert to do the job than it is to struggle to do it yourself. Plus, the return on investment will be more than worth it, as your professional-looking website will attract more paying clients to your company. 

Determine your marketing budget

If you don’t know how much money you have available to spend on marketing, you’ll struggle to formulate any sort of strategy. Defining your budget enables you to allocate money to each area of your marketing, so you don’t miss any important promotion techniques or overspend.

You’ll need to factor in the costs of traditional marketing tools, like leaflets and flyers, if you’re using these. Note that digital marketing tools, such as email campaign platforms or social media scheduling tools, also cost money unless you’re using a basic unpaid plan.

If you plan on hiring in-house or freelance marketers, gauge the average hourly rates for this role to create an accurate marketing budget.

Start an engaging weekly blog for your audience

Blogging is one of the most effective ways to drive more traffic to your website in order to generate more leads. The more online content you create, the higher the chances of a potential client stumbling across your company.

Plus, when your consistently update your website with accurate and relevant information (as you would when you start a weekly blog), Google will recognize your website as being credible. Therefore, your site will rank highly in search engine results pages, and you can get more eyes on your law firm.

Consider blogging about your company and your team of lawyers and in which areas they specialize. You can also share interesting company news that your audience might be interested in reading.

Regardless of the content you share, make sure it’s engaging. You’ll want to show your human side and add character to your blog copy so that you can maintain your audience’s attention. Eventually, you’ll be able to build a loyal following on your blog and build a strong and reputable name for yourself in the industry.

Create an email list and send weekly campaigns

Email marketing is a relatively new concept in comparison to traditional marketing methods. But don’t underestimate its power!

Sending regular email campaigns can boost your success significantly. You can keep your law firm at the forefront of people’s minds so that your company is the first they think about when in need of legal advice.

Your email campaigns can comprise interesting industry-related news and company updates. Make sure to include plenty of images to break up large blocks of text and keep your audience engaged.

You’ll also need to include plenty of links to your website. Doing so makes it as easy as possible for your readers to learn more about your company if they wish to after reading your newsletter.

Before you can start sending any email campaigns, you’ll need to build a list of email subscribers. You can do this in a number of ways, such as by creating a sign-up form on your website or asking your audience directly if they’d like to sign up for your weekly newsletter.

Make sure to cleanse your email list every six months or a year. Run through every subscriber and check whether their email address is still active. If your emails ‘bounce’ back after you have sent them to a particular email address, it’s probably inactive (or there is a typo in the email address that you’ll have to correct for your emails to send properly).


Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/lawyerscommunity

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Sick companies and the regulations governing them

0

This article has been written by Pramit Chakraborthy, pursuing a Diploma in US Corporate Law and Paralegal Studies and has been edited by Oishika Banerji (Team Lawsikho). 

It has been published by Rachit Garg.

Introduction 

“You cannot have development in today’s world without partnering with private sector” – Hillary Clinton

It is a known fact that the private sector drives any nation’s economy and as a result every developing and developed nation promotes business friendly infrastructure and policies. The other side of the coin is that many private sector companies fail to achieve their target and often go bankrupt. This phenomenon is present in every industry of the world and is known as industrial sickness and concerned companies are known as sick companies. In India the government brought legislation to regulate and to provide relief to sick companies and look for a permanent solution, bank nationalisation in 1969 was one of such measures to build confidence in the economy but it failed to keep its charm and ultimately lost meaning in the ever changing business landscape of the country. Over time the need for specialised regulations were felt.

Historical background of sick companies and the regulations governing them 

In 1956 the Companies Act was introduced to regulate corporate governance and miscellaneous matters in the country however it proved to be of no use in addressing the sickness problem. The Central Government, Government of West Bengal, RBI, along with other banks at a joint meeting held in July 1970 at Calcutta which resulted in them taking certain basic decisions regarding rehabilitation of sick industrial units and after consideration in April 1971 had set up the Industrial Reconstruction Corporation of India Ltd. with its headquarters at Calcutta to fortify the institutional structure for the provision of reconstruction and rehabilitation to sick and closed industrial units.

A High-Level Committee headed by Shri H. N. Ray in 1976 suggested that ailing but potentially viable units may be merged with sound units and proposed that a scheme may be made by the concerned authorities for implementation of the same vide an enabling legislation and also suggested that amendments be made in the Companies Act,1956.

Finally in 1984 following the recommendations of the Tiwari committee to establish a mechanism that will investigate the viability of a particular venture and help in its rehabilitation, merger, or liquidation in 1985 the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act was enacted to counter industrial sickness and regulate the measures for rejuvenating the viable industries and liquidate the ones which are beyond saving.

Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (SICA)

Definition 

The word ‘sick industrial company’ finds its mention in Section 2(o) of the Act and it is defined as “an industrial company (being a company registered for not less than five years) which has at the end of any financial year accumulated losses equal to or exceeding its entire net worth”. 

Features

  • The SICA Act, 1985 established two new bodies for handling sick companies and helping in their rehabilitation. These bodies are:
  1. Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR).
  2. Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction ( AAIFR)
  • The BIFR was established with a sole objective of rehabilitation and reconstruction of sick companies and release of public funds sunk in those companies into the open market. The Board consisted of a chairman and two to fourteen other members. The Act placed an obligation on the board of the sick industries to report its sickness to the BIFR and the BIFR was given powers to investigate the correctness of such claims.
  • If the board found it to be sick it would have given the concerned company a reasonable time to come up with a rehabilitation plan and execute it or it could have taken other measures such as taking over the management of the company, merging sick units with a healthy one or if the company is beyond saving, recommend it’s liquidation.
  • An appellate authority was also set up by the name of AAIFR for companies to approach if they were unhappy with the measures or recommendations made by the BIFR.

Problems with BIFR and AAIFR 

  • The body though initially successful in dealing with the traffic with a somewhat impressive performance in the 1990s with 1020 registered cases, out of which 954 were heard, 175 were dismissed as not maintainable, and 124 rehabilitation plans were approved and of the other 661 cases, the board sanctioned 182 revival plans and recommended that 120 cases be wound up. As the time progressed the body rather than being an efficient machine unblocking locked funds in failed ventures became a safe haven for the defaulting companies. In the year 2007, BIFR registered 5,471 references with 1,337 being recommended for winding up and only 825 revival schemes sanctioned.
  • Section 22 of the Act gave sweeping powers to the BIFR including the power to stop all legal proceedings until further notice. The legislature wanted to protect the companies till the time they became revenue positive, but the promoters used this provision to bypass their legal obligations. Noting this fact, revered economic Journalist Nirmala Ganapathy, once stated that BIFR is nothing, but a graveyard of companies and it only works if the promoters are willing to make it work. Otherwise, it is just a tool for avoiding legal obligations.
  • Another problem of BIFR was it didn’t concern itself with Small Scale Industries (SSI) which limited its scope given that small case industries till date commands 33.4% of manufacturing output in India and also contributes 30% to India’s GDP. This lacuna limited the applicability of the Act.
  • The fourth major problem with the SICA act was that it dealt exclusively with industries and did not consider companies of other formats which could not be classified as an industry.

Repeal of SICA, 1985

  • On realisation that SICA was not delivering its assigned purpose a high level committee was constituted under the chairmanship of Hon’ble Justice V. Balakrishna Eradi, a former judge of the Supreme Court to look into the complaints raised. The Committee in its report titled “Report of High-Level Committee on Law Relating to Insolvency and Winding Up of Companies” suggested the SICA act be repealed, and relevant provisions should be amended into the Companies Act, 1956.
  • In 2001, an advisory committee headed by N.L.Mitra suggested that the BIFR and AAIFR be dissolved keeping in mind the problematic working structure and constant delays plaguing the institution
  • Accordingly, the government passed the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Repeal Act of 2003 which disbanded the BIFR and AAIFR but it was finally gazetted on December 1, 2016 and the relevant provisions of SICA act were structured into the Companies Act, 2013.

Companies Act, 2013

The features that was brought along by the Companies Act, 2013 have been stated hereunder: 

  • The relevant provisions of the SICA Act were streamlined into the Companies Act, 2013 under Chapter XIX (Sections 253 to 269). The NCLTs were given sole power to overview the process of rehabilitation, revitalisation, liquidation, winding up etc. Section 253 of the Act provides that when on demand of a creditor having 50% or more of the debt issued to a company, the company:
  1. Failed to pay the debt within 30 days from the issuance of notice by the creditors, or,
  2. Failed to secure the debt received from the creditors, the company can be determined as sick.

On such determination an application may be made to the NCLT in a prescribed format and a decision may be given by the forum within 60 days from the submission of application. If the company was found to be fit to repay the debts it shall be ordered to do so, otherwise measures such as attachment of assets or winding up may be made.

  • The right to approach the NCLT is given to companies also. It has to make an application to the Forum in the prescribed form along with attested copies of audited financial statements of the preceding financial year and a scheme for revival and rehabilitation of the company. After 60 days of such application the NCLT will give a direction on whether the company is sick or not and then it shall proceed with the plan if viable or order for its winding up.
  •  Section 261 of the 2013 Act broadly provides for 3 types of options.
  1. Financial reconstruction.
  2. Change or takeover management.
  3. Merger or amalgamation of the sick unit with any other healthy unit either within the same company or different companies.
  • A rehabilitation scheme framed within these lines will be filed in the NCLT after its approval by 3/4th of the secured and unsecured creditors. It is pertinent to mention that Companies Act, 2013 mainly concerns itself with secured creditors and not with all the other stakeholders. The role of unsecured creditors only comes into the picture at the time of approval of the rehabilitation scheme.

After consideration of the scheme submitted the NCLT shall either approve it with or without consideration or reject it. If the Scheme is accepted it shall be communicated to the company administrators, the ROC and in case of merger and amalgamation, to the other company also. However, if no scheme could be formed. The NCLT shall activate Chapter XX and send the company to be wound up.

Criticism surrounding Companies Act, 2013 

  • The Companies Act, 2013 though was a step forward from the previous law, the problem of concurrent statues remained. The laws governing the sick industry landscape at the time were: 
  1. Presidency Towns Insolvency Act,1909.
  2. Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
  3. The Recovery of Debt Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
  4. The Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920.
  5. Companies Act, 1956.

As a result, a time bound efficient process could not be established and the average resolution time frame of a company was anywhere between 4 to 6 years. As such the need for a single structured process arose.

  • The legislation was primarily focused on resolving the issues with insolvency and bankruptcy of companies and firms and not of individuals. 

The Ministry of Finance acknowledging the apparent problems on 22nd August, 2014 created a committee called Bankruptcy Legislative Reforms Commission (BLRC) under the chairmanship of retired Supreme Court Judge, Justice Sri Krishna to draft a new bankruptcy law following the work done by him in his FSLRC (Financial Sector Legislative Reforms Commission). The Committee submitted its report on 4th November 2015 and a draft bill was placed before the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) on 23rd December 2015 and after the report of the JPC it finally got President’s assent on 28th May, 2016.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

The Code repealed the two pre – independence laws that are:

  1. Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909, and
  2. The Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920,

It also made amendments to 11 laws, including the Companies Act, 2013, the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, and the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, for proper implementation of the new legislation.

 Features 

  • One of the biggest features of this code is that the process of insolvency or bankruptcy can be started by all the stakeholders and not only secured creditors which is an improvement upon the Companies Act, 2013. This process can be started by –

o   Financial Creditor within the meaning of Section 7 of the Code

o   Operational Creditor within the meaning of Section 9 of the Code.

o   Corporate Debtor within the meaning of Section 10 of the Code

  • It brings under one roof all companies, Individuals, LLPs, and partnership firms.
  • The establishment of the Insolvency Law Committee to take stock of the execution of the new legislation and to make suitable recommendations on a case to case basis.
  • The criterion for determining the sickness of the company has been shifted from a gross revenue model to cash flow model which is a better parameter for consideration.
  • The Adjudicating authority has been given to two forums, viz

o   The National Companies Law Tribunal (NCLT) for Companies and LLPs

o   The Debt Recovery Tribunals for Individuals and Partnership Firms

  • The IBC has Specified its application area via Section 2 of the Act, Viz-

o   Any Company

o   Limited Liability Partnerships

o   Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors

o   Partnership and proprietorship firms

o   Individuals other than Personal guarantors

o   Such other body corporate as maybe notified by the central government from time to time

Performance of IBC so far

The most prominent feature of IBC is its time bound resolution process and its proper enforcement. As per Niti Ayog report as on June 2020, 250 companies had been rescued and 955 others referred for liquidation. According to IBBI, the resolution plans yielded about 191% of the realisable value for financial creditors, on average of 380 days, which is a tremendous improvement from the previous regime, which took about 1500 days on average to resolve. As per the latest IBBI Quarterly report of June – September 2022 a total of 5893 cases were admitted under IBC amongst which 3946 have been closed. Of the CIRPs closed, the CD was rescued in 2139 cases, of which 846 have been closed on appeal or review or settled; 740 have been withdrawn; and 553 cases have ended in approval of resolution plans, while 1807 have ended in orders for liquidation

Criticism received by IBC 

The biggest criticism of the IBC has been its enforcement of the timeline provided by the legislation that is 180 days with an extension of 90 days in rare cases. As per the IBBI Quarterly report of January- Marc, 2022, the average time for disposal of cases is 408 days, which is a far cry from the actual time frame fixed in the Act.

The second aspect of this point is the judicial discretion practised in the forums for enforcement of the mandatory Period. It is now a settled position of law that at the time of admission of application under Section 7,9 or 10 of the code, the 14-day period given in the IBC Act is only directory in nature. As such copious amounts of time is taken at the admission stage alone

Current scenario of IBBC

  • India has jumped from 130 in 2016 to 63 in 2022 in ease of doing business index and one of the driving forces of this ranking is IBC.
  • Proper forums have been established that deal with the enforcement of specific laws. For example, the Debt Recovery Tribunals mainly work with SARFAESI Act, 2002 and the RDBB Act, the National Company Law Tribunals mainly work with Company Law, 1956, 2013 and the insolvency and bankruptcy laws and the civil courts take care of the claims which are less than 10 lakhs in value
  • The RBI has introduced many schemes to enable banks to revive an ailing companies and pump the trapped money into the market, the corporate debt restructuring scheme and the strategic debt restructuring scheme (SDRS) is one of them. The SDRC is a successor of the corporate debt restructuring scheme. It is not above criticism as the corporate bodies have said that the 180-day period given is not enough to acquire, manage and bring the ailing company to good health.
  • Group companies have prompted a new kind of problem as they consist of many entities which have different roles and often depend on one another for completion of a specific task. Therefore, when some parts of the group declare insolvency the CIRP process becomes cumbersome as the entities when singled out do not profess the same value as when they were engaged as a whole. The IBBI Committee in its report titled “REPORT OF CBIRC-II ON GROUP INSOLVENCY” dated December 2021 suggested that the Supreme Court dictum regarding lifting of corporate veil and engaging these companies as a single entity should be considered. The Committee report is yet to be implemented. However, the concept is applicable following the Supreme Court Judgment on Life Insurance Corporation of India vs Escorts Ltd. and Ors (1985). Later in June, 2021 the IBBI issued another report where they dealt with the framework for cross border insolvency resolution.

Conclusion 

India is witnessing a huge boom in its markets and the start-up culture is also picking up. An unavoidable by-product of this is the rise in the number of NPAs and sick companies in future. With the current regulation it will be hard for India to maintain its good ranks in the ease of doing business index, therefore it is suggested:

  • To promote CDR and SDRS schemes amongst the companies, the inter-creditor and Debt Creditor agreements should be made binding. There should be a proper CDR forum to enforce these contracts which is outside the scope of NCLTs and DRTs and normal civil courts.
  • To implement the recommendation of the May report of the insolvency law committee to direct the financial creditors to submit only IU verified documents so that the tribunals could be relieved of the burden of going through the paperwork and establish whether a company is sick or not.
  • The companies should be given alternative remedies and should not be pushed towards liquidation if they could not pay the debts. It is suggested that the government may provide financial support which is viable but under a lot of debt and revive them back to health. A separate fund may be built for this.
  • The “Haircuts” given by banks to the financial debtors must be regulated. As such there is no provision for haircuts offered by banks to companies and for that it is ripe for exploitation. The Hon’ble Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman while addressing this issue stated that it was unacceptable that banks should take a hefty haircut on loans that go through the resolution process, adding that a 95% haircut could not possibly be the “best resolution” the IBC had to offer, even if some companies came in such a bad state that only ‘junk value’ could be derived and as such a proper law must be made as to how much a bank can forgo.
  • NCLT is only working on 34 vacancies with a sanctioned vacancy of 63 members. The Vacancies should be filled.
  • The law for merger, amalgamation etc of sick companies should be subsidised by tax cuts. It must act as a kind of reward to the acquirer company to promote the market.

Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/lawyerscommunity

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Section 179 of the Companies Act, 2013

0
Companies-Act

This article has been written by Subhadeepa Sen, a BA LLB (Hons.) student from the School of Law, Christ (Deemed to be University), Bangalore. This article aims to provide a detailed understanding of the powers of the Board of Directors provided under Section 179 of the Companies Act, 2013.

This article has been published by Sneha Mahawar.​​ 

Introduction

Section 179 lays down the powers of the Board of Directors of a company. The Board of Directors, or Boards (BoD), as they are usually referred to, forms one of the most crucial units of a company. They play a vital role in the overall management and governance of the company. 

Section 149(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 mandates a company to have a minimum of three directors and a maximum of fifteen directors. The primary responsibility of the BOD is to provide strategic direction and guidance and ensure that the organisation is managed to keep in mind the best interests of the stakeholders. The Board also monitors the company’s performance and ensures that the company is functioning in compliance with all relevant statutory requirements. Major decisions such as mergers, acquisitions, investments, changes in capital structure, etc. rest in the hands of the Board of Directors. 

This article shall discuss in length about the various powers conferred upon the directors of a company. The readers get an understanding of the composition of the Board, their role in the functioning of a company and the powers conferred upon them under Section 179 and Rule 8 of the Companies (Meeting of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014.

Board of Directors in a company under the Companies Act, 2013 

The term Board of Directors has been defined under Section 2(10) as the collective body of the directors of the company. In general terms, it may be understood as a group of individuals elected by the company’s shareholders to oversee the company’s management and functioning. Section 149 of the Companies Act 2013 states that the BoD can comprise only individuals. That is to say that no artificial person can become a member of the board. The Board of Directors is aimed at ensuring that the interests of the stakeholders are taken care of in the best possible manner and the company is being run in an efficient manner. 

The Board of Directors typically comprises executive as well as non-executive members. The executive members may include individuals like Chief Executive Officers (CEOs), Chief Financial Officers (CFO), etc. Independent members are not employees of the organisation; they are external individuals appointed based on their expertise, skills, and experience.

Section 149 prescribes that for a private company, the minimum number of directors would be 2; for a public company, the minimum requirement is 3 directors, whereas, an One Person Company (OPC) is required to have 1 director.

The number of directors generally ranges between 5 to 15 members. The elected directors generally serve for a period ranging between one to three years and have a provision for re-election if they can meet the board’s requirements.

Section 165 of the Companies Act, 2013 also prescribes that an individual person can be the director of 20 companies at one time. There is also a requirement to have a minimum of one woman director in every company. Additionally, the one-third proportion of the board must compose of independent directors.

The Board of Directors is led by the Chairman of the company, who is elected by the BoD. Executive directors are responsible for administration, sales, finance, and other business processes. In contrast, the non-executive directors provide critical opinions and advice to the company. They are not employees of the company however are part of the BoD. On the other hand, managing directors are those who are elected by executive directors for the purpose of providing guidance and overseeing the business’s functioning.

For listed companies, Regulation 17 of the Securities and Exchange of India (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirement) 2015 provides the composition of the Board of Directors.

It states that the Board must comprise of both executives as well as non-executive directors who shall not be less than 50% of the total composition. The Company is required to have a minimum of one woman director. Further, one-third of the BoD shall constitute independent directors if the chairman is a non-executive director. Whereas, if the chairperson is an executive director, then at least half of the board must comprise independent directors. 

Role of Board of Directors in a company

The Act provides clarity on the responsibilities and powers of the Board of Directors of the Company. It states that the director is required to act in good faith and exercise independent judgment in the best interests of the company. Disclosure of conflict of interest is an essential duty of a director in furtherance of which they are required to abstain from participating in discussions involving such matters. It is the duty of the BoD to ensure that the company has adequate systems and processes in place to manage risks and maintain an appropriate level of accountability and transparency. The Companies Act, 2013 aims to enable the directors to establish internal controls, financial reporting systems, and a code of conduct for the members of the company. The directors are also vested with the responsibility of overseeing the preparation of the company’s financial statements and ensuring that they are accurate and transparent.

The statute has provisions for the appointment of committees of the board, such as the audit committee, the nomination and remuneration committee, and the stakeholders’ relationship committee. These committees play a critical role in ensuring that the company’s management and governance systems are robust and effective.

The Board is responsible for setting the strategic direction of the organisation, overseeing the fiscal performance of the company, and deciding upon vital corporate policies. It is also their responsibility to check whether the company is operating in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations and to act in the best interests of shareholders at all times.

In furtherance, the performance of the senior executives of the company is also overseen by the directors. They play a key role in decision-making for actions like mergers-acquisitions etc. To sum up, a director’s role is critical to the success of any company.

Powers of the Board of Directors

Under the Companies Act 2013 in India, Board of Directors have various powers that are specified by law. Some of them are as follows –

  1. Power to make decisions – The Board of Directors is vested with the power to make decisions on behalf of the company. It is their responsibility to provide strategic guidance to the company, and therefore they have the power of important decision-making and steering the organisation in the right direction. It is of paramount importance that the company runs in a manner that is in the best interest of the stakeholders and, at the same time, is in compliance with the laws and regulations in force. Therefore the directors have been given the power to approve or reject major business transactions, such as the decision of a merger/acquisition or to approve or disapprove the financial plans of the company. 
  2. Power to appoint and remove directors – The Board of Directors has the power to appoint and remove other directors from the company. This must be done in accordance with the company’s article of association and the procedures set out under the companies act. Under Section 152 of the Act, the directors exercise this power by way of voting. In addition to the power of appointment, the power of removal also vests with the directors under Section 169 of the Companies Act, 2013. (Add from provisions).
  3. Power to act as an agent of the company– The Board of Directors has a fiduciary relationship with the company. That is to say that they have a relationship of trust and confidence and the power to act on behalf of the company. The director acts as an agent of the company for its benefit. Thereby they have the power to enter into contracts and legal agreements on behalf of the company. The authorisation for the exercise of such power comes from the Articles of Association of the Company or by resolutions passed by the Board of Directors. 
  4. Power to delegate – The power to delegate certain duties and responsibilities to other individuals within the company is enjoyed by the Board of Directors. Responsibilities relating to certain business transactions or management of specific departments are some of the functions that could be delegated by a director. These delegations must be made in accordance with the Article of Association and Companies Act, 2013.
  5. Power to approve dividends – The decision regarding the approval of dividends to be paid to the shareholders is taken by the directors. The decision to pay dividends must be based on the company’s financial performance and the company’s ability to pay dividends. Dividends can only be paid out of the company’s profits and must be approved by a resolution of the Board of Directors.
  6. Power to approve financial statements – The power of approving financial statements of the company vests with the directors. Statements such as balance sheets, income statements, and cash flow statements fall under this category. Such statements must be prepared in accordance with accounting standards and must be a true and fair representation of the company’s financial position.
  7. Powers to manage the company– The Board of Directors of a company have the power to manage the organisation. Management power includes the power to make business decisions, provide strategic decisions and run the company in an efficient manner. This power must be exercised by the directors in a manner that would be in consonance with their fiduciary duties, including their duty to act in good faith and in the best interests of the company.

Analysis of Section 179 of the Companies Act, 2013

Section 179(1)

The provision begins with prescribing principles of agency to the directors. It provides that the director would be empowered to exercise such powers and do such acts as the company is authorised to do. This brings into play the agency and fiduciary roles of the directors. They act on behalf of the company.

There are two provisos provided in this Section.

The first one provides the limits within which the board is required to use its power. It lays down that the Board of Directors shall exercise their powers subject to the Companies Act, 2013 Memorandum of Association, Articles of Association and regulations made in the general meetings.

The second proviso to the Section provides that the Board shall refrain from doing any act or thing which is to be done by the company in the general meeting or directed or required under the Companies Act, Memorandum of Association, and Article of Association.

Section 179(2)

Section 179(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 goes on to say that an act done by the Board of Directors would not be invalidated by any regulation passed by the company in the general meeting, which otherwise would have been valid had the regulation not been passed.

This provision is a reflection of the balance of power between the shareholders and the directors. The tussle for power between the directors and the shareholders of a company is long-drawn. However, the shareholders are not empowered to subside the power of the directors, as held in the case of The Public Prosecutor v. T.P. Khaitan (1956).

Section 179(3)

Section 179(3) provides what powers the Board of Directors can exercise on behalf of the company by means of passing resolutions at Board meetings.

  1. Power to make calls on shareholders in respect of money unpaid on their shares – The Companies Act, 2013 provides the directors the power to make calls in respect of money unpaid on shares and this is a key aspect of corporate governance. It enables the director to require the shareholders to pay amounts outstanding on their shares. The company usually takes the amounts from the shareholders in the form of calls. The first installment for the share amount is paid at the time of issue and the rest of the installments are known as calls. This serves as an important tool to ensure that the shareholders do not fail to meet their obligations to the company and the dues on their shares are paid in full. 

The Articles of Association of the company provide the directors with this authority. The directors are required to send notice to each and every shareholder stating the amount due and the date by which it must be paid. In situations where there is a failure to pay the amount by the due date, the directors are empowered to take enforcement action to recover the debt, which includes filing a legal claim or appointing a debt collection agency. The directors also have the power to forfeit shares if the shareholder fails to pay the amount due on time. Such actions have serious repercussions for the shareholders; for example, result in the loss of their equity in the company and their right to participate in the organisation’s management. This power, however, is not unfettered in nature. The Companies Act, 2013 provides that such power cannot be exercised in an arbitrary manner. The directors must act in good faith, keeping in mind their fiduciary duties and the best interests of the company. The directors must be given a reasonable opportunity to pay the amount, and the process should be fair and transparent.

  1. Power to authorise buy-back of securities – Section 68 of the Companies Act, 2013 allows a company to buy back its own securities subject to the approval of its board of directors and shareholders. This power vests with the Boards and is an essential tool for the organisation to manage its capital structure. It aids the company in returning surplus funds to its shareholders and thereby increases shareholder value. The buying back of shares is subject to the conditions laid down under Section 62 of the Companies Act, 2013. It can be made from the existing shareholders, open market purchases, or through a tender offer. The maximum amount that can be utilised for the buyback is 25% of its total paid-up capital and free reserves. Authorisation of such buy-backs results in the reduction of outstanding shares, enhances the earnings per share and increases the shareholder value. Furthermore, since the number of shares available for acquisition is brought down, hostile takeovers are also more likely to be prevented. There are certain restrictions on this power of the directors, for example- the requirement for a special resolution to be passed by the shareholders and the prohibition on buyback in case of default in repayment of deposit or interest thereon, among others.
  2. Power to issue securities, including debenture in or outside India – Under the Act, the power to issue securities, including debentures, is vested with the board of directors. The BoD is empowered to issue securities for the purpose of raising capital for the company’s business operations, expansion, or investment. This can be done within India as well as outside. The Board of Directors are required to pass a resolution specifying the type of securities, the number of securities to be issued, the face value of the securities, and the price at which the securities are to be issued. The entire process must be done in compliance with the prevailing laws and must be authorised under the articles of the company. Additionally, the directors must take due care that the necessary approvals have been obtained from the regulatory authorities. Furthermore, all disclosures must be made as per the requirement of SEBI, failure to which shall lead to legal consequences.
  3. Power to borrow money – The Board of Directors under this provision are empowered to borrow monies on behalf of the company. In order to exercise this power, a board resolution is required to be passed, which would outline the purpose of borrowing, the amount to be borrowed, the terms and conditions of the borrowing, and any security that may be required to be provided to the creditors. The financial advisors of the company play a key role in approving such a resolution. The Articles of Association lay and the borrowing policies of the company lay down the limits within which such power is to be exercised. This power is required to be used prudently by the directors and only for purposes that will benefit the interest of the company such as financing business operations, funding new projects, investing in capital assets, or repaying existing debt.
  4. Power to invest the funds of the company – Under the Companies Act, 2013 the power to invest the funds of the company is vested with the Board of Directors. This function is of vital importance since this involves a certain quantum of risk and the BOD is expected to exercise it judiciously. A thorough evaluation is required to be done in respect of the nature of the investment, the risk involved, and the potential returns before the investment is made. Along similar lines, the resolution which approves a decision to invest the funds of the company must, in detail, outline the purpose of the investment, the amount to be invested, the expected returns, and the risks involved. The financial position of the organisation and the probable impact of the investment in the operations of the company are some of the other factors that must be taken care of. After the investment is made, it is the responsibility of the directors to regularly review the investments and ensure they are in line with the company’s financial objectives and investment policies so that the interests of the company and its stakeholders are protected.
  5. Power to grant loans or give security in respect of loans – The BoD is empowered to grant loans, give guarantees, or provide security in respect of loans. However, the directors cannot exercise this power in an unfettered manner. Under Section 185 of the Companies Act, 2013 a company cannot provide loans, guarantees, or security to its directors or any person in whom the director is interested. The Act has stipulated certain exceptions to this such as loans provided in the ordinary course of business and loans given to employees as part of their terms of employment. The directors must make sure the loans or securities are being given only after approval from the board by means of a resolution and are within the limitations set out in the articles and the policies of the company.
  6. Power to approve company’s financial statements and the board’s report- A company’s financial statements include a balance sheet, profit and loss account, and cash flow statement, along with other related documents such as notes to accounts and auditor’s report. Section 134 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides that the board report must contain details, such as the state of the company’s affairs, the financial results, and the details of the board’s meetings. Additionally, the Corporate Social Responsibility policies (these refer to policies through which a company integrates environmental and social concerns in its operation) must also be reflected on the board’s report. It is required that the financial statements are prepared in compliance with the applicable accounting standards and present a true and fair view of the company’s financial position. It must be done in accordance with a procedure prescribed under the Act as well as in compliance with relevant rules such as the Companies (Accounts) Rules of 2014. The approval of the financial statements and the reports must be done at the board meeting and the directors would be required to sign the above-named documents stating that they have reviewed and approved the same.
  7. Power to diversify the business of the company – This power vests with the Board of Directors. The directors of the company are empowered to initiate the company to enter into a new arena of business. It is required to prepare a detailed report, which includes the justification for diversifying the business, the potential benefits and risks associated with the diversification, and the impact of diversification on the financials of the company.
  8. Power to acquire a stake in other companies, approve merger acquisitions or amalgamations– In any acquisition, it is required that the board of directors must approve such a decision. The fiduciary role of the directors comes into play here. The director is required to inform the stakeholders about the rationale of the company, the reason behind such merger/acquisition/amalgamation and the benefits sought to be derived from such transaction at the time of the deal. The SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations 2011 mandates the BOD to set up a committee of independent directors who are required to provide reasoned recommendations on the transactions. These recommendations are required to be published by the company. Additionally, the directors are required to file a notice to the Competition Commission of India within 30 days from the approval of a proposal of a merger or an amalgamation in compliance with requirements under the Competition Act, 2002.

Section 179 further provides that the BoD can, by means of a resolution passed at a board meeting, delegate its powers to borrow money, invest funds, grant loans, or give securities to any committee, managing director, manager or principal officer of the branch office.

Section 179(4)

Section 179(4) provides a restriction on the rights to be exercised by the Board of Directors. It states that the Company vide its general meeting has the power to impose restrictions and conditions on the Board of Directors while exercising their powers prescribed under Section 179. Further on, Section 180 of the Companies Act, 2013 imposes restrictions on the prescribed powers of the BoD and ensures that they are not exercised in an unfettered manner. 

Additional powers of the Board under Rule 8 of the Companies (Meeting of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014

The Companies (Meeting of Board and its Powers) Rules 2014 provide a framework for the conduct of board meetings and the exercise of powers by the directors of a company. In addition to Section 179, Rule 8 of the 2014 Rules outlines certain additional powers vested with the Board of Directors.

These powers are as follows –

  1. Making political contributions: Section 182 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides limitations for political contributions. It puts forth that Government Companies and a Company that has been in existence for less than three years is prohibited from making any kind of political contribution. Except for these two kinds, other companies are permitted to make such contributions. Such contributions can be made only after passing a board resolution and full disclosure in its profit and loss account of the total amount contributed.
  2. Appointing or removing Key Managerial Personnel (KMP): The Rule provides that the following companies are required to appoint whole-time Key Managerial Personnel –

a. Public Company having a paid-up share capital of Rupees 10 Crore or more;

b. Private Company having a paid-up share capital of Rupees 10 Crore or more;

c. Every listed Company.

A whole-time KMP receives remuneration from the company and is not allowed to hold any position in any other company simultaneously, other than a subsidiary company. Section 2(51) of the Act provides the definition of Key Managerial Personnel. They are responsible for taking crucial company decisions and managing the employees. It is also their duty to see to it that the mandatory compliances laid down by the Act are being followed by the company.

3. Appointment of internal auditors and secretarial auditor: Section 138(1) of the Companies Act and the Companies (Accounts) Rules, 2014 provides the classes of companies that are required to appoint an Internal Auditor. The individual to be appointed can either be an employee of the organisation or an external member. It is required to obtain written consent from the proposed individual, after which a Board Meeting is required to be conducted for his appointment and to fix his remuneration. Section 204(1) of the Companies Act mandates Secretarial Audit for every listed company. It is mandated that only a certified Company Secretary can become a Secretarial Auditor. The Secretarial Auditor is to be appointed by means of a board resolution post which the resolution is to be filed with the ROC.

Conclusion 

The Board of Directors of a company enjoys a number of powers conferred upon them by virtue of the Companies Act, 2013 and its allied rules. These powers are vested in them so as to enable them to efficiently manage and operate the company. While using the powers conferred upon them, the director should act in the best interest of the company. Directors have a fiduciary duty to act in the best interest of the company. The personal interests of the directors should never override the interests of the company and its stakeholders. The directors must act prudently while exercising their powers and exercise due diligence. They must take all reasonable steps to gather information, assess risks and make informed decisions. It is necessary that the decisions taken by the board should not be influenced by any personal or external pressures and should make decisions based solely on their best judgement and in the best interest of the company. Directors are required to maintain transparency while exercising their powers. The other stakeholders of the company should not be kept behind any veil of ignorance. The directors must also ensure compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and promote ethical conduct. By following these principles, directors can ensure the long-term success and sustainability of the organisation.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Who is a director of a company under the Companies Act, 2013?

The term “director” has been defined under Section 2(34) of the Companies Act, 2013. A director may be understood as an individual who is appointed in order to carry out the responsibilities of a company’s director.

Can a director of a company act on his/her own without the approval of the Board of Directors?

The Companies Act, 2013, provides that the Board of Directors of a company must act collectively and make decisions by passing resolutions at board meetings. They must act in the best interest of the company, keeping in mind the interests of all the stakeholders. A decision taken by any director without the approval of the board would not bind the company, and the director would be responsible for any losses or damages caused to the company as a result of such actions in his personal capacity. However, in certain urgent situations, a director may take actions on his/her own, such as in situations when it is not possible to hold a board meeting on short notice, but such actions must be ratified by the Board of Directors at the next board meeting. 

What are the restrictions on the powers of a director of a company under the Companies Act, 2013?

Section 180 of the Companies Act, 2013, provides restrictions on the powers of the director. It provides situations wherein the directors can exercise their power only by means of special resolution.

References 


Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/lawyerscommunity

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Punishment for Section 34 IPC, 1860

0

This article is written by Prabha Dabral from IMS Unison University, Dehradun. The article talks about the concept of common intention. It focuses on the elements and punishment for acts committed under the influence of common intention.

This article has been published by Sneha Mahawar.​​ 

Introduction

The general principle of criminal liability says that the person who commits a criminal act will solely be responsible for that. And will be punished accordingly. But what happens when more than one person is involved in a single criminal act? Who among the individuals is to be punished for that?

If there arises a situation where a criminal act is done with the contribution of several persons, it becomes difficult to determine which of them is to be held liable for such an act. To deal with this, there is a provision of common intention mentioned under Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860. It helps in determining the accountability of each individual so that they are awarded the punishment for which they are liable for. 

What is Section 34 IPC

Section 34 deals with the criminal act done by several persons with a common intention. The term “common intention” suggests that there is a shared intent or mindset among the people accused of the criminal act. 

The Section states that when two or more persons commit a criminal act with a common intention, then each of them is liable for that act. It is considered as if the criminal act was performed by all of them individually. It is a general provision that is applied in situations where it is challenging to determine the precise degree of responsibility of each person involved. In a way, Section 34 aids in determining the individual accountability of persons involved in the same criminal act.

This Section is also applicable when there is a prior engagement of two or more persons in the commission of a crime. And if any of the persons commit an act against the law, then every person engaged in the act is liable. 

Illustration 

Here is an illustration for understanding the provision better. There are 4 persons who share a common intent to beat ‘X’ after he leaves his workplace. All of them arrive at the location when a fifth person, ‘Y,’ passing through them decides to join them to beat ‘X’. They executed the plan. Here, the said provision will be applicable. 

The Section is also applicable even when the person so involved has not himself committed the offence. Here is another illustration to help understand the concept. Suppose ‘A’, ‘B’, and ‘C’ decide to rob a bank without hurting any individual present there. As per their plan, ‘B’ and ‘C’ were supposed to collect the cash, while ‘A’ had to get the door for keeping the check at the police. While collecting cash, the guard came at ‘A’, and out of fear, ‘A’ stabbed him. 

In this case, all the essentials of Section 34 are satisfied. Hence, all three of them will be liable for robbing the bank and for the murder of the security guard. Although ‘B’ and ‘C’ were not actively involved in the murder, they are still guilty because the act committed by them was in furtherance of their common intention. Hence, they are all jointly liable for the murder.

Essentials of Section 34 IPC

Section 34 has some essentials that need to be fulfilled to hold a person guilty of such an offence. They are as follows:

A criminal act done by two or more people

It is the most important ingredient in this section. A criminal act is an act or omission forbidden by law that may be punished by the state. There must have been a criminal act done, and that, too, by more than one person. The acts committed by each individual might be different. But it must be done in a way that involves participating in the execution of the criminal offence. In other words, the act must be done with the simultaneous consensus of the minds of the people participating in the act to bring about the intended result. A minimum of two persons are required for the applicability of this section. 

Participation of all the persons involved

It is essential that the act is done in furtherance of the common intention with the participation of all the involved persons. Each person should have done an act to facilitate the commission of the planned criminal act. In other words, there must be the participation of all the persons in some way for the commission of the offence. 

The presence of a person somewhere near the spot of the crime is sufficient to prove his participation if the act is done as per the common intention. The case of  Ramaswami Ayyangar & Ors. v. the State of Tamil Nadu depicts this situation. It involved the commission of physical violence. It was held that since physical violence was involved, it is a requirement for the accused to be physically present there while the act was committed. Only then can he be held liable under Section 34, as his presence itself amounts to participation. But it is not right in every case.

In another case, Jasdeep Singh v. State of Punjab, the Supreme Court held that generally, the presence of the accused is a necessary requirement under Section 34. But this is not applicable in all cases. As in some cases, the accused can support the occurrence of the crime even from a distance. Hence, a lack of presence cannot be construed as a lack of participation.

Existence of a shared intention

Common intention can be referred to as a purpose shared by every person involved in a crime. In simple words, the intention of crime becomes common among all people. And the criminal act committed by several people must be done according to the common intention shared among them. 

The prior meeting of minds is an essential ingredient in this Section. The act done by each individual might be different in degree and character but the act must be initiated from the same common intention among the persons.

  1. The act must be committed in furtherance of the common intention

The act must be done in the advancement of the common intention among all the people. The phrase “in furtherance of common intention” is quite vague. It has been interpreted by many courts in different ways over the years. In the case of Mahbub Shah v. Emperor (1945), the Bombay High Court held that common intention refers to a prearranged plan, a prior meeting of minds, and prior consultation between all the persons involved.

The punishment provision 

There is nothing mentioned about a separate offence under Section 34. It only lays down the principle of liability, stating that if several persons do something against the law, then all of the persons will be held liable. Hence, the punishment for this section is given according to the punishment provided for the crime under the IPC. Each time a criminal act is committed by two or more persons, both sections are applied, i.e., Section 34 combined with the punishment for the crime committed by the convict.

Section 34 is a rule of evidence. It does not create any explicit offence on its own. Since it defines no explicit offence, it is always read with other substantive sections of the IPC.

For example, ‘A’, ‘B’, and ‘C’ commit the offence of murder in furtherance of common intention. In this case, all three of them will be held liable under Section 302 along with Section 34 of the IPC. Here, all three of them will be awarded with the punishment of imprisonment for 10 years and a fine by each of the convicts. 

Recent case laws

Here are some of the recent judicial pronouncements regarding Section 34 IPC.

Krishna Master & Ors. v. State of U.P. (2010)

Facts

In this case, the petitioner’s son, Amar Singh, had eloped with the respondent’s daughter, Sontara, and left the village. The respondents continuously imposed a threat upon the petitioner to find his son and bring back his daughter. One day Amar Singh was in the village, and the respondents made an attempt to assault him and take revenge. But their attempt failed as Amar Singh fled after getting information about it from his neighbour’s wife, Ramwati. The respondents were highly agitated after learning that it was the petitioner’s neighbour who had given the information to Amar Singh. 

When the respondent’s daughter did not come back in spite of his threats to the petitioner, they became restive and uneasy. After 10 to 15 days, the three respondents carrying country-made pistols in their hands, entered the house of the petitioner’s neighbours. They started firing shots and killed six people. Seeing this, the petitioner with his family ran away. 

The learned judge of the Trial Court convicted each of the respondents under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The Allahabad High Court acquitted the respondents. The petitioner then filed an appeal in the Supreme Court.

Judgment

The Supreme Court upheld the judgment of the Trial Court. It was held that each of the three respondents was liable under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. All of the three respondents were sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life along with a fine of Rs 25,000/- each, in default RI for 2 years.

Shyamal Ghosh v. State of West Bengal (2012)

Facts

In this case, Archideb Bhattacharjee (deceased) has gone out to visit someone for some business matters. As he was returning home, he was assaulted by the accused persons and restrained from his path. The accused persons murdered Bhattacharjee and severed the head, legs, hands, and body of the corpse to hide the evidence. They put them in gunny bags and threw them at some other place. During the investigation, it was found that the day before the incident, the accused persons had come to Bhattacharjee’s house and demanded Rs 40000/-. They were threatening him to pay the amount for letting the 6 shop rooms on his own land. When he refused to succumb to the illegal demand, the accused kept on threatening him. 

The Trial Court charged these eight accused of committing offences under Sections 302, 201, 379, and 411 read with Section 34 of the IPC. The offence was considered to be among the rarest of rare cases. The aggrieved party then filed the petition with the High Court. The Court acquitted the accused persons of the offence under Section 379 IPC. The court awarded them with rigorous imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs 5000/- each. For committing an offence under Section 201 IPC, they were awarded rigorous imprisonment of 7 years along with a fine of rupees 5000/- each.  Later, the correctness of the judgement of the High Court was challenged by the accused. Hence, this appeal was filed.

Judgment

The Supreme Court held that the offence was committed with common intention and collective participation. And the various acts were performed by each of the accused persons in the presence of each one of them. The Court dismissed the appeal and the decision of the High Court was upheld.

Ashok Debbarma @ Achak Debbarma v. State of Tripura (2014)

Facts

This case talks about a tragic incident. A group of armed extremists burn down 20 houses in a village in Tripura. Those houses belong to a minority community of Bengali settlers. Due to the fire, 15 people lost their lives, and the rest faced extensive damage to property. Out of the 11 accused persons, charges were framed against five of them under Sections 326, 436, and 302 read with Section 34 of IPC. The Trial Court acquitted three of the accused persons under Section 232 of the Code of Criminal procedure(CrPC), 1973. The two accused persons, namely Gandhi Deb Barma and the appellant herein, were held guilty under the said offences. The Additional Sessions judge sentenced the appellant to death on his conviction under Sections 148, 149, 302, 326, 307, and 436 IPC. The sentences passed by the Sessions Judge were sustained by the High Court, which was then challenged through this appeal. Here, the involvement of the appellant in the incident was in question as the name of the appellant was never mentioned in the FIR. 

Judgment 

The Supreme Court held that the mere fact that the accused was not mentioned in the FIR cannot be sustained as two of the witnesses have already mentioned his name. The Court observed that the appellant could not have executed the entire crime. The appellant alone could not be solely responsible for all the elements of the crime. The court altered the death sentence to life imprisonment. 

State of Rajasthan v. Gurbachan Singh (2022)

Facts

The facts of the case are that Gurbachan Singh and others came armed with a lathi, an axe and a gandasi. A person named Teja Singh was beaten up by them and died on the spot. The Trial Court convicted them under Section 302 IPC. Gurbachan Singh then filed an appeal in the High Court. He contended that his conduct should not be inferred under common intention as he was armed with a lathi only and had only struck the feet of the deceased. The Court allowed his appeal. 

Judgment

The Apex Court disagreed with the findings of the High Court. The Court observed that common intention can be formed in the spur of the moment. It was held that Gurbachan Singh along with all accused persons is responsible for the offence of murder. It doesn’t matter what part they played in the commission of the crime.

The order of sentences passed by the Trial Court was restored. They were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and punished with life imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 1000/-.  

Conclusion

The concept of the commission of crime committed to the furtherance of common intention by several persons is given under Section 34 of the IPC. This is supposed to be involved with other provisions as it cannot be applied independently. It is read with other sections to make all the persons jointly liable for the crime committed. When more than one person is involved in a crime, the role and motivation of each person are determined by the idea of shared culpability. 

FAQs

How is common intention different from the common object?

A common intention under Section 34 IPC does not constitute a distinct crime. It establishes a rule of proof. This section necessitates a prior meeting of the minds. On the other hand, a common object under Section 149 IPC establishes a particular offence. In this offence, prior agreement of minds is not a necessity.

What is the punishment if a person is guilty under Section 34 IPC?

This section is only a rule of evidence. It only gives a broad description about joint accountability. Hence, no penalty has been specified under this section. 

Is a prior meeting of minds necessary to be guilty of common intention?

Yes, as per Section 34 IPC, prior meetings of minds is one of the essential ingredients.

References 


Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/lawyerscommunity

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

A study on insider trading regulation

0

This article has been written by Chhatrapal Singh Shaktawat, pursuing Diploma in US Contract Drafting and Paralegal Studies. It has been edited by Oishika Banerji (Team Lawsikho). 

It has been published by Rachit Garg.

Introduction

Insider trading refers to the trading of a security by someone who has knowledge of material non-public information relating to that particular security or the company. It is very much necessary to have certain rules and regulations for the smooth governance of the security market. According to Section 11 of the Securities Exchange Board of India Act (SEBI), 2011, the SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 1992 were enacted to end the illegal insider trading prevalent in India. The object of enacting such legislation is to provide fair information to all the players in a market rather than providing benefits to certain sections of participants in the field. This article explores the concept of insider trading in India thereby pointing out the existing regulations governing the same. 

What is insider trading

Insider trading is a process in which an individual (insider) gathers internal information of the company which is not yet published in the public domain thereby misusing the same for his own personal gain and advantage, illegally in the share market. An insider can be any individual having a minimum of six months experience in the operating company and who is also a fiduciary of a director, employee or the owner of the concerned company, according to SEBI (Insider Trading) Regulations, 1992. There are two types of insider trading in accordance with the variety of shares which are affecting the share market, namely, legal insider trading and illegal insider trading. 

Advantages of insider trading

Insider trading has three positive approaches, namely:

  • Share market players can have profits as they have internal information of the company. So, once the investors have the information then they know the financial position of the company and hence they have the idea of buying shares and then trading.
  • The previous point mainly helps institutional buyers in the field.

Disadvantages of insider trading

Insider trading is considered illegal in India because:

  • The said practice is only advantageous to rich investors as it makes them richer and the process turns prejudicial for other investors as they miss fair opportunities.
  • It is an offence and if any individual is found doing that then he would be charged under both the Companies Act, 2013 and the SEBI Regulations, 1992.

Regulation of insider trading market in India

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs and SEBI Regulations for Prohibition of Insider Trading (RPIT), are the two government bodies which are responsible for governing insider trading in India.

Legal position and statutes regarding insider trading India

The existing statutes that are responsible for governing insider trading in India have been discussed hereunder. 

Section 195 of the Companies Act, 2013

According to this section,  the term ‘insider trading’ signifies an offence which involves any person who have access to the information of the company (which is confidential or not made public by the administration of company) as he is holding any officer post in that particular company and he either buys, sells, subscribes, deals or make agreements to do such act with the information. The provision states that violation of its terms will render an imprisonment of over five years. Alongside the same, the provision prescribes a fine of not less than five lakhs rupees, which can be extended to 25 crores as well. 

Securities Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Insider Trading Regulations), 1992

This statute of 1992 is very much clear about any person who is an insider and therefore mandates that such an individual under no circumstances deals with the securities of a company which is listed in a stock exchange for trading if he has a piece of unpublished information (the information which is not in the public domain). The provision further directs that the insider in possession of such information cannot even communicate or counsel or even publish such information either directly or indirectly to any person who is having interest or benefit in that particular piece of price-sensitive information. A punishment of about ten years of imprisonment is awarded for the offence of insider trading under the statute of 1992. 

Landmark cases relating to the insider trading market in India

The case of Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. etc. vs. Union of India and others (1992), commonly known as the TISCO case, is considered to be one of the landmark judgments concerning insider trading in India. In this case, the court of law had wisely observed the respondents’ argument which went on to argue based on the financial profit made by the company in different financial years as published by the company itself. The court observed that the profit earned by the company in the first half of the financial year of 1992-93 was fifty crores and twenty-two lakhs rupees. This profit was far less than the profit earned in the financial years of 1991-92 and 1990-91, which were ₹278.16 crores and ₹238.13 crores respectively. The huge difference in the profit of the company in three consecutive years was a clear indication that there has been the commission of insider trading by the company. This was the first case which addressed the need of having governing legislation so as to curb the ris eof insider trading among companies. 

In the case of Reliance Industries Ltd.(RIL) vs. SEBI (2001), the petitioner was a company with net worth of $27 billion (US dollar), who also owned shares in many other companies. Among all, the company owned 5.32% shares in Larsen & Toubro (L&T). Further, the petitioner started purchasing shares of L&T which made Reliance own 10.25% of the total share of the company. Now, these shares were further sold by Reliance to another company named Grasim Industries Ltd. But, the shares were sold at a higher price in comparison to what was prevalent in the market. The shares were sold at ₹306.60 per share whereas the market rate was ₹208.50 per share. The court of law made Reliance Industries Ltd. withdraw from dealing and even further went on to prohibit Reliance to deal with L&T in future. Reliance was even directed to make many more disclosures in relation to the stock exchange and L&T. 

In the case of Rakesh Agarwal v. SEBI (2003), the adjudicating authority (which is SAT) was of the opinion that insider trading is a criminal offence. Further Bombay High Court in the case of Cabot International v. SEBI (2004), had opined that the violets of SEBI Act must be tried under civil law as the act is of civil nature. The Supreme Court of India had upheld the Bombay High Court’s decision in the case of SEBI v. Shriram Mutual Fund and Another (2006), where the Court observed that the element of mens rea is not essential while deciding the case relating to SEBI Act, thereby categorising it as a civil offence. 

Improvements required in insider trading regulation in India

It’s a general saying that ‘criminals are one steps forward than the administration’, I believe the same is with the case of insider trading regulation in India and this is because the authorities have not been using the modern technologies as an impotent medium to the investigation or tracking of incident to find out the wrong happening in the system. The major problem of the nation is the lack of contemporary and modern technologies which are advanced up to a mark that the proper surveillance could be done in order to detect the wrong and catch the offender. In simple words, it is nearly impossible to catch the offender with such a light system which is not equipped with modern mechanisms of surveillance. The lack of technical expertise makes the body handicap and hampers the inquiry or investigation in a significant manner.

A country like the USA could be followed in this regard where the body responsible for stock exchange has a highly efficient mechanism for surveillance to catch the act of insider trading and further pursue its investigation. It is true that both the bodies SEC and SEBI have their own fully automated oversight system for their market capital separately but, despite USA in comparison to India enjoys the best surveillance system and oversight which further helps in detecting the cases of insider trading.

It is highly challenging to prove a case against insider trading as most of them are generally based upon circumstantial evidence. The recordings of telephone and transcript are the only evidence in most of the cases of insider trading and that’s the only way where the nexus is proved that people are involved in illegal insider trading. But, apparently in India, SEBI doesn’t have the right to tap the phone to detect the wrong going on even after it being one of the is one of the crucial powers of investigation. Soon after the case of Securities and Exchange Commission v. Rajat K. Gupta and Raj Rajaratnam (commonly known as Raj Rajaratnam-Rajat Gupta insider trading case) case was brought under public domain, SEBI had approached the Indian government for the right of telephone taping for detecting the fraud and other illegal activity going under stock exchange especially insider trading. The same has been denied on grounds of privacy breach and scope of misusing. 

Conclusion 

Since the stock market is changing rapidly so the governing law also needs to be changed. With the introduction of new laws and amendments from time to time, the scope for curbing insider trading regulation can be said to improve for the better. 

References

  1. https://idr.nitk.ac.in/jspui/bitstream/123456789/14150/1/138002HM13F05.pdf.
  2. https://legalstudymaterial.com/insider-trading/.
  3. http://www.raijmr.com/ijrhs/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/IJRHS_2014_vol02_issue_04_02.pdf

Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/lawyerscommunity

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Section 7 IBC

0

This article is written by Shivank Verma, a final-year student of law at Hidayatullah National Law University. The author gives an overview of Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and its various aspects.

This article has been published by Sneha Mahawar.​​ 

Introduction

Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is located in Chapter II of Part II which deals with the Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons (hereinafter “CIRP”). CIRP proceedings against a corporate debtor can be initiated either by a Financial Creditor (Section 7), Operational Creditor (Section 9), or a Corporate Applicant (Section 10). Section 7 deals with the requirements and procedures to be followed by a Financial Creditor while initiating CIRP against a corporate debtor.

Who is a Financial Creditor

A financial creditor is defined in Section 5(7) of the Code to mean a “person to whom a financial debt is owed and includes a person to whom such debt has been legally assigned or transferred to.” Financial debt is further defined in Section 5(8) of the Code to mean a debt along with interest, if any, which is disbursed against the consideration for the time value of money. The sub-section also provides an illustrative and non-exhaustive list of examples that constitute a financial debt, however, for the purposes of this article, it is not necessary for us to go into each of them.

Overview of Section 7

Sub-section (1)

Section 7(1) provides that a financial creditor, either by itself or jointly with other financial creditors, can file an application for CIRP against a corporate debtor before the Adjudicating Authority when a default has occurred.

Before we dwell into the provisos of this sub-section, two minor points may be clarified. First is that the Adjudicating Authority being referred to here is the National Company Law Tribunal constituted under Section 408 of the Companies Act, 2013. Second is that the term ‘default’ has to be interpreted in light of Section 4 of the Code. Section 4 [read with notification Gazette Notification S.O. 1205(E)] of the Code clarifies that Part II of the Code applies in relation to only those defaults where the minimum amount of default is one crore rupees. Therefore, it is necessary for initiating a CIRP under this section that the corporate debtor has committed a default of more than one crore rupees.

Application by a class of creditors

The first proviso to the sub-section provides that for the financial creditors that are referred to in Sections 21(6A)(a) and 21)(6A)(b), an application for CIRP shall be filed either by –

  1. at least one hundred creditors in the same class or 
  2. at least ten percent, whichever is less, of the total number of creditors in that class.

Sections 21(6A)(a) and 21(6A)(b) talk about those financial creditors where the financial debt owed to them is in the form of securities or deposits in whose respect a trustee or agent is authorised to act as a representative of such financial creditors, or is where the financial debt is owed to a class of creditors exceeding the number as may be specified except in cases where such debt is extended as part of a consortium arrangement or syndicated facility.

Application by allottees under a real estate project

By virtue of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2018, an explanation was added to clause (f) of Section 5(8) of the Code, which had the effect of bestowing upon the allottees under a real estate project the status of financial creditors. Such allottees, therefore, are also entitled to file an application under section 7 to initiate CIRP against the corporate debtor. However, the second proviso lays down certain restrictions with respect to their application. It specifies that such an application is to be filed only either by –

  1. at least one hundred allottees under the same project or
  2. At least ten percent of the total number of allottees, whichever is less.

The third proviso states that where an application under Section 7 of the Code is filed before the commencement of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2020 and such application is not admitted by the Adjudicating Authority, the same is to be modified within thirty days of the commencement of the said Act (Note – the amendment Act came into force on March 13, 2020) to comply with the first and second provisos failing which the application will be deemed to be withdrawn.

Explanation to Sub-section (1) – ascertaining default

The explanation clarifies that default under this sub-section includes a default in respect of a financial debt owed not only to the financial creditor who is making the application under Section 7 but also to other financial creditors.

To understand this, let us take an example. Assume that X, a corporate debtor, owes financial debts to three financial creditors A (to the tune of Rs. 20 lakhs), B (to the tune of Rs. 35 lakhs) and C (to the tune of Rs. 48 lakhs). A makes an application to the National Company Law Tribunal under Section 7 for initiating CIRP against X. His application will not be rejected on the ground that the individual debt owed to him does not meet the default threshold under Section 4, since the total financial debt owed by X to all the three financial creditors does meet that threshold (Rs. 1.03 crore).

At this point, it is also pertinent to mention that while this explanation allows the financial creditors to include the defaults of other financial creditors while making a Section 7 application, he cannot include the debts owed to the operational creditors within the default amount. One of the reasons for the same is that with respect to operational debts, there are other requirements that need to be fulfilled, including sending a demand notice or an invoice to the corporate debtor while also ensuring that there is no dispute as to the existence of such debt. These requirements do not exist with respect to an application under Section 7.

Sub-section (2)

Sub-section (2) provides that an application by a financial creditor under Section 7 shall be in such form and manner as may be prescribed.

In respect of this, the Central Government has notified the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 prescribing the form and manner in which an application under Section 7 is to be made. Specifically, Rule 4 provides that a financial creditor shall make an application under Section 7 of the Code in Form 1, accompanied by such documents and records that are required therein. Form 1 of the Rules prescribes the manners and particulars to be given along with the application –

“APPLICATION BY FINANCIAL CREDITOR TO INITIATE CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION UNDER CHAPTER II OF PART II

[Date]

To,

The National Company Law Tribunal

[Address]

From,

[Names and addresses of the registered offices of the financial creditors]

In the matter of [name of the corporate debtor]

Subject: Application to initiate corporate insolvency resolution process in the matter of [name of the corporate debtor] under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

Madam/Sir,

[Names of the financial creditor(s)], hereby submit this application to initiate a corporate insolvency resolution process in the matter of [name of corporate debtor]. The details for the purpose of this application are set out below:

Part-I

Particulars of Applicant

  1. Name of the Financial Creditor
  2. Date of Incorporation of Financial Creditor
  3. Identification Number of Financial Creditor
  4. Address of the Registered Office of the Financial Creditor
  5. Name and Address of the person authorised to submit an application on its behalf (authorisation to be enclosed)
  6. Name and Address of person resident in India authorised to accept the service of process on its behalf (authorisation to be enclosed)

Part II

Particulars of the Corporate Debtor

  1. Name of the Corporate Debtor
  2. Identification Number of Corporate Debtor
  3. Date of Incorporation of Corporate Debtor
  4. Nominal share capital and the paid-up share capital of the corporate debtor and/or details of guarantee clause as per Memorandum of Association
  5. Address of the Registered Office of the Corporate Debtor

Part III

Particulars of the Proposed Interim Resolution Professional

  1. Name, Address, Email Address and the Registration Number of the Proposed Interim Resolution Professional

Part IV

Particulars of Financial Debt

  1. Total Amount of Debt granted and the date of disbursement
  2. Amount claimed to be in default and the date on which the default occurred (the workings for computation of such amount and days of default to be attached in tabular form)

Part V

Particulars of Financial Debt [Documents, Records and Evidence of Default]

  1. Particulars of security held, if any, the date of its creation, and its estimated value as per the financial creditor. If the Corporate Debtor is a company, the certification of registration of charge issued by the Registrar of Companies is also to be attached
  2. Particulars of an order of a court, tribunal, or arbitral panel adjudicating on the default, if any (copy of such order to be attached)
  3. Record of default with the Information Utility, if any (copy of such record to be attached)
  4. Details of succession certificate, the probate of a will, letter of administration or court decree (as is applicable), under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (copy to be attached)
  5. The latest and complete copy of the financial contract reflecting all amendments and waivers to date (copy to be attached)
  6. A record of default as available with any credit information company (copy to be attached)
  7. Copies of entries in a Bankers Book in accordance with the Bankers Book Evidence Act, 1891 (copy to be attached)
  8. List of other documents attached to the application in order to prove the existence of a financial debt, the amount, and the date of default

I, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, [name of proposed insolvency professional], is fully qualified and permitted as an insolvency professional in accordance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and the associated rules and regulations.

[Name of the financial creditor] has paid the requisite fee for this application through [state means of payment] on [date] and served a copy of this application by registered post/speed post/by hand/electronic means to the registered office of the corporate debtor and to the Board.

Yours sincerely,”

Sub-section (3)

Sub-section (3) lays down that along with the application, the financial creditor is required to furnish the following –

  1. Record of the default with information utility or any other such record as the Board may specify
  2. The name of the proposed resolution professional to act as an Interim Resolution Professional
  3. Any other information that the Board may specify

Apart from this Rule 4(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 mandates that where the applicant is an assignee or transferee of a financial contract, the applicant is required to attach the copy of such assignment or transfer contract which demonstrates the existence of such assignment or transfer

Regulation 2A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process For Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 (hereinafter “CIRP Regulations”) states that for the purpose of furnishing the record of the default under Section 7(3)(a), any one of the following –

  1. Copies of entries (certified) in the relevant account in the bankers’ books (as defined in Section 2(3) of the Bankers’ Books Evidence Act, 1891
  2. An order of the court or tribunal that has adjudicated upon the non-payment of a debt, where against such order, the appeal period has expired

Further, as Regulation 2C specifies, the Financial Creditor is also required to furnish along with the application, the details of his/its –

  1. Permanent Account Number
  2. Email-ID

Proposal of Interim Resolution Professional

There is one other point here that may be noted – while it is mandatory for the Financial Creditor to propose an Interim Resolution Professional for CIRP, this is not so for the Operational Creditor; Sub-section (3) uses the word ‘shall’ which in effect mandates the financial creditor to furnish the name of Resolution Professional to act as an Interim Resolution Professional. However, Section 9, which deals with the application by an Operational Creditor, specifically mentions in clause (4) that it is optional for him to make such a proposal.

Rule 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 further mandates that while making a proposal to appoint an Interim Resolution Professional, the financial creditor is required to obtain a written communication from the Insolvency Professional sought to be appointed as such in the manner as laid down in Form 2, which is as follows –

“WRITTEN COMMUNICATION BY PROPOSED INTERIM RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL

[Date]

To,

The National Company Law Tribunal

[Address]

From,

[Name and address of the registered office of the proposed interim resolution professional]

In the matter of [name of the corporate debtor]

Subject: Written communication in connection with an application to initiate corporate insolvency resolution process in respect of [name of the corporate debtor]

Madam/Sir,

I, [name of proposed interim resolution professional], an insolvency professional registered with [name of insolvency professional agency] having registration number [registration number] have been proposed as the interim resolution professional by [name of applicant financial creditor] in connection with the proposed corporate insolvency resolution process of [name of the corporate debtor].

In accordance with rule 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016, I hereby:

(i) agree to accept appointment as the interim resolution professional if an order admitting the present application is passed;

(ii) state that the registration number allotted to me by the Board is [insert registration number] and that I am currently qualified to practice as an insolvency professional;

(iii) [disclose that I am currently having the following assignments in hand:

Sl. No.Assignment asNumber of Assignment(s)No.Name of the Corporate DebtorDate of commencement of processExpected date of closure of process
Corporate Processes
1IRP1
2
3
2RP1
2
3
3Liquidator (including voluntary liquidations)1
2
3
4Authorised Representative1
2
3
Individual Processes
5Resolution Professional
6Bankruptcy Trustee
7Any other.

(iv) certify that there are no disciplinary proceedings pending against me with the Board or [name of the insolvency professional agency he is a member of];

(v) affirm that I am eligible to be appointed as a resolution professional in respect of the corporate debtor in accordance with the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016;

(vi) make the following disclosures in accordance with the code of conduct for insolvency professionals as set out in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Professionals) Regulations, 2016;

(Signature of the insolvency professional)

(Name in Block letters)”

Sub-section (4)

Sub-section (4) states that on the receipt of the application for CIRP by a Financial Creditor, the Adjudicating Authority within fourteen days of its receipt shall –

  1. Ascertain the existence of a debt, whether from the records of an information utility or on the basis of other evidence as furnished by the financial creditor;
  2. If the existence of the such debt is not ascertained and an order under sub-section (5) is passed by the Adjudicating Authority, the reasons for the same are to be recorded in writing.

Sub-section (5)

Sub-section (5) provides that where an Adjudicating Authority is satisfied that –

  1. A default has occurred;
  2. The application for CIRP is complete in all respects; and
  3. There are no disciplinary proceedings pending against the proposed resolution professional

It may by order admit the application for CIRP under Section 7.

Section 7(5)(b) states that in absence of any of the above three, the Adjudicating Authority may reject the application for CIRP. However, before making such an order, the Adjudicating Authority must give notice to the applicant’s financial creditor to rectify such defect within seven days of the receipt of that notice.

It may be noted that the usage of the word ‘may’ does suggest that despite the fact that the default exists and all the requirements of the application are fulfilled, the Adjudicating Authority may still choose not to admit the application. This is further corroborated by the fact that the word may is not used with respect to a Section 9 application by an Operational Creditor, where the word shall is used for the admission of application. In fact, the same was held by the Supreme Court in Vidarbha Industries Power Ltd. v. Axis Bank Ltd (2022), where it stated that –

The fact that Legislature used ‘may’ in Section 7(5)(a) of the IBC but a different word, that is, ‘shall’ in the otherwise almost identical provision of Section 9(5)(a) shows that ‘may’ and ‘shall’ in the two provisions are intended to convey a different meaning. It is apparent that Legislature intended Section 9(5)(a) of the IBC to be mandatory and Section 7(5)(a) of the IBC to be discretionary. An application of an Operational Creditor for initiation of CIRP under Section 9(2) of the IBC is mandatorily required to be admitted if the application is complete in all respects…

On the other hand, in the case of an application by a Financial Creditor who might even initiate proceedings in a representative capacity on behalf of all financial creditors, the Adjudicating Authority might examine the expedience of initiation of CIRP, taking into account all relevant facts and circumstances, including the overall financial health and viability of the Corporate Debtor. The Adjudicating Authority may in its discretion not admit the application of a Financial Creditor.

There is however one other anomaly that arises in acceptance of this interpretation. If the Adjudicating Authority may reject the application despite the fulfillment of all requirements, then Section 7(5)(b) seems to be conferring a discretion to the Adjudicating Authority to accept such an application where the requirements are not fulfilled thus pushing the corporate debtor to CIRP and possibly even liquidation where the financial creditor itself has not made a full and defect free application, since the said clause also uses the phrase “may, by order, reject such application”. Such interpretation would defeat the purposes of the Code and hence requires further relook by the Parliament.

Sub-section (6)

Sub-section (6) lays down that the CIRP of the corporate debtor commences from the date when Adjudicating Authority admits the application under sub-section (5).

Sub-section (7)

Sub-section (7) states that within seven days of admission or rejection of a Section 7 application, the Adjudicating Authority is required to communicate the order –

  1. In case where the application has been admitted under Section 7(5)(a), to the financial creditor and the corporate debtor;
  2. In case where the application has been rejected under Section 7(5)(b), to the financial creditor

Such communication must be made within seven days of the date of admission or rejection of the application.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the default threshold to initiate an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016?

Section 4 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 provides that the minimum amount of default for the purposes of Part II of the Code (where Section 7 is located) is one lakh rupees, but the Central Government can increase this minimum amount. Through Gazette Notification S.O. 1205(E), the minimum threshold has been extended to one crore rupees.

Whether the default amount of one crore rupees should be met by the applicant’s financial creditor alone?

The explanation to Section 7(1) clarifies that default means default not only in respect of the debts owed to the applicant’s financial creditor but also includes the debts owed to other financial creditors as well. However, this does mean that the default amount must not include the debts owed to the operational or other creditors.

Is it binding upon the Adjudicating Authority to appoint the insolvency professional proposed by the financial creditor in its Section 7 application as the interim resolution professional?

Yes. Under Section 16(2) of the Code, the Adjudicating Authority must appoint the proposed insolvency professional as the interim resolution professional if no disciplinary proceedings are pending against him.


Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/lawyerscommunity

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Protection order under Divorce Act, 1869

0

This article has been written by Mariya Masood Khan, a second-year student at Advocate Balasaheb Apte College Of Law Mumbai Maharashtra and pursuing Diploma in Advanced Contract Drafting, Negotiation and Dispute Resolution from LawSikho. It has been edited by Oishika Banerji (Team Lawsikho). 

It has been published by Rachit Garg.

Introduction

The protection orders are defined under Chapter 6 (Sections 27, 28, 29, 30, 31) of the  Divorce Act, 1869. The protection orders are given by the courts for safeguarding the interest of the deserted wife. By the virtue of Section 27 of the Divorce Act, 1869, the wife reserves the liberty to approach the court of law for the protection of her interest, if deserted without any feasible cause. To seek shelter from the court, desertion must take place without any reasonable cause. The court can dismiss the granted orders once the desertion ceases to end. This article provides a detailed analysis of the concept of a protection order as has been placed under the Divorce Act of 1869. 

What is a protection order

In a general sense, protection orders are legal instructions or commands given by the court directing an individual not to harm another (aggrieved individual) or his property. Protection orders under the Divorce Act, 1869 are given in regard to the property of the deserted wife, against the husband. 

Provisions related to protection orders under the Indian Divorce Act, 1869

  1. Section 27 (Deserted wife may apply to the court for protection):

A deserted wife may approach any district court with competent jurisdiction at any time after the desertion happened for the protection of her interest. Deserted wives under Section 27 include those to whom Section 4 of the Indian Succession Act 1925, does not apply (Indian Succession Act, doesn’t apply to Hindus, Muhammadan, Buddhist, sikh and Jain). 

  1. Section 28 (Court may grant protection order):

Courts by using their discretionary power may or may not grant the protection order in regard to the property. If the court is satisfied or may think that the desertion happened on unreasonable or absurd grounds, without the consent of the wife and the wife is maintaining herself from her property or any business or industry or the part of the property of her husband which she has an interest or right, then on such grounds, it may extend protection order to the wife. Such delivered orders need to be conclusive for the time passed. 

  1. Section 29 (Discharge or variation of orders):

Under Section 29, as the court has discretionary power to grant protection orders, it does have the additional power of dismissing the same on any reasoned grounds or if there is a need for any alterations in the already delivered protection order. The grounds on the basis of which, discharge or variation of existing order can take place, have been listed hereunder: 

  • If the desertion ceases thereby the husband reunites with his wife and assents to carry forward his matrimonial obligations with the wife, or
  • Wife misuse the protection granted by the court, or
  • For any other reasonable grounds.
  1. Section 30 (Liability of husband seizing wife’s property after notice of order):

If the husband or his creditors or any other person claiming under him seizes or continues to hold such property by going against the court orders, then in such cases, the wife is entitled to file a suit against such person. The specific property shall be delivered or returned to the wife under the appropriate condition by the husband and he shall also be liable to pay a sum amount of money as compensation to the wife, and the compensation shall be double of such particular property’s value.

  1. Section 31 (Wife’s legal position during the continuance of order):

 If the wife obtains a protection order from the court,

  • She shall be deemed to have been deserted by her husband without reasonable cause,
  • She shall possess the absolute and full  right over the property in respect of all positions,
  • She will have the right to enter into the Agreement with respect to the property,

To protect such right she shall be in the position of suing others who infringes her right over the property and being sued for the same during the continuance of a protection order.

What does desertion mean when done with unreasonable cause

Section 3(9) of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 defines desertion as an abandonment against the wish of the person charging it. In Savitri vs. Prem Chandra Pandey (2002) the court of law stated that “desertion” means withdrawal from the matrimonial obligations and not withdrawal from a place, with the intention of permanent forsaking and abandonment of one partner by the other without the other’s consent and without feasible reason from the other spouse. In other words it is a total repudiation of the obligations of marriage.

The essentials of desertion were laid down in the case of Ka Ersilian Lyngdoh vs. U kordring Rao Sad (1986), as has been listed hereunder: 

  1. Separation of one spouse from the other;
  2. The intention of the deserting spouse to put an end to marital cohabitation but without reasonable excuse.
  3. There must also be the absence of: 
  • The other spouse’s consent; and
  • Conduct reasonably causing the deserting spouse to form an intention of bringing the cohabitation to an end. 

Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 states that desertion will not be established until the desertion period continues for not less than two years. When for two consecutive years a spouse deserts the other spouse, then the same can be termed as desertion. .Desertion is therefore a valid ground for divorce under Section 13(1)(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act,1955.

To understand the unreasonable cause, one should understand its meaning. Reasonable cause means that the party can avail the matrimonial relief from the court, under Section 10 of the Divorce Act, 1869. So, when either spouses desert or leave the other with the absurd ground or illogical cause then it is said to be desertion on the unreasonable cause.

What does property under protection orders mean

Under Section 3(10) of the Divorce Act, 1869, property in the case of a wife includes any property to which she is entitled to an estate in remainder or reversion or as a trustee, executrix, or administratrix. Under Section 27 of this Act, the property is clearly defined as one upon which a wife can request protection which is the property she may have acquired, or may acquire, or she may have become possessed, or may become possessed.

Which courts have jurisdiction under the Divorce Act, 1869

By means of the Indian Divorce (Amendment) Act of 2001, Section 27 was amended to invest jurisdiction upon the district courts instead of high courts, with the purpose of reducing the burden of the latter. Hence, the district court has a wider jurisdiction in matrimonial subject matters under this Act thereby having the authority of delivering protective orders in regard to property. Under Section 3(3) of the Divorce Act, 1869, district courts have the jurisdiction in the case of all such petitions that include granting of protection orders under the Act of 1869, as follows:

  1. The court of the district Judge having ordinary jurisdiction,
  2. Where the husband and wife solemnise their marriage or,
  3. Where the husband and wife reside or have last resided together before their desertion.

Protection order under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005

Under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (D.V. Act), courts grant protection orders which are restricted to its physical sense only. Courts can prevent the respondents from contacting the aggrieved party or prohibit the respondent to not enter where the aggrieved party is employed or is residing. Under the Act of 2005,  for the protection of the aggrieved party from domestic violence, the state government appoints a protection officer at district level who will look into all necessary aspects of the domestic violence matter.

Judicial pronouncements 

Sudhannya K.N. vs. Umasanker Valsan (2013) (Kerala High Court): 

In the case of Sudhannya K.N. vs. Umasanker Valsan (2013), the petitioner (wife of the respondent) filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to declare that a person will be entitled to seek relief under Sections 18 and 19 of the D.V. Act from a family court by invoking Section 26 of the D.V. Act by means of issuing a writ of prohibition. 

In the above case, the Kerala High Court had opined that a family court does have the jurisdiction to pass the interim order and protection orders under Section 28, as the provision gives the power to the district court to declare the protection orders in order to protect the property of the deserted wife.

Ravi Kumar vs. Julmi Devi  (2010) (Supreme Court of India)

In the case of Ravi Kumar vs. Julmi Devi  (2010),  the Supreme Court clearly stated that the intention to desert the other spouse in marriage is the most important element in determining the existence of desertion. The marriage between the parties in the discussed case had taken place on 13.12.1988 according to Hindu rites and customs and in March 1990, a girl was born to them. The husband alleged that after the birth of the girl child, his wife left for the parental house at village Samlet and spent considerable time there. It was further alleged that his wife, who was working, on being transferred from Garli to Chauaku, stayed at Chauaku instead of her matrimonial home which was only at a distance of 3 Km from the place of her posting. However, the husband admitted that in May 1994, his wife came to his house for a short period and stayed there with him till the month of May, 1994. After that, his wife is alleged to have permanently deserted him. Thus the Apex Court had made out a case of desertion in this case. 

Conclusion

The concept of a protection order is a welfare concept which aims to promote the interests of deserted women so that they can live a life worth living as has been guaranteed under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. Therefore, the importance given to it in this article seeks to put forth the need to make females aware of protection orders so that they are legally empowered to exercise choices of living alongside recognizing their duties to not misuse the safeguard granted to them. 

Reference

  1. https://www.lawyerservices.in/Ravi-Kumar-Versus-Julmi-Devi-2010-02-09.

Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:https://t.me/lawyerscommunity

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Aspects of lease and issues associated

0

This article has been written by Kamakshi Verma pursuing a Diploma in Advanced Contract Drafting, Negotiation and Dispute Resolution from LawSikho and has been edited by Oishika Banerji (Team Lawsikho). 

It has been published by Rachit Garg.

Introduction 

Lease, defined under Section 105 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, is an agreement which could be implied (by the conduct of the parties) or written with formulated conditions, by which a lessor accepts to let out his/her property for usage by the lessee. The one who lets out the property is the lessor and the one who uses the property is the lessee. The agreement contains promises for both lessor and the lessee. Lessee uses the property for an agreed period of time while the lessor is assured a certain consistent/periodic payment over that agreed period of time. Both lessor and lessee are bound by the terms of the contract, and they would face the consequences if either of them failed to meet the contractual obligations. The lessor is the legal owner of the property, and only vests the lessee with the right to use or occupy the property for a specific period. The right of ownership is retained when the lessor itself receives periodic payments based on their contract from the lessee. The lessor must be compensated for any losses incurred during the contract due to damage or misuse of the property let out.

Whenever an agreement is in place, it is advisable to be considerate about the issues that surround the same. On a similar note, when it comes to a lease agreement, the specific clauses that are inserted enumerating the rights and obligations of both the lessor and the lessee serves as the platform to raise contentions by either of the parties, in times of conflict. While the lease is in place, the lessee would be responsible for taking care of the property and conducting its regular maintenance. Pertinently, if the subject matter of the lease is a house, the lessee must not indulge in making any structural changes in it without the prior permission of the lessor. Any damages done to the property in question must be repaired before the expiry of the lease deed. If the lessee failed to make the repairs or failed to replace any broken fixtures, the lessor would have the right to charge the amount of the repairs or replacement to the lessee as per the lease deed.

Important clauses in a lease agreement 

When it comes to a lease agreement, clauses such as tenancy period, time of renewal of your lease, the date of payment of rent, arbitration clauses as a medium to resolve disputes, and provisions surrounding maintenance and repair of the leased premise, hold the most relevance. A rent agreement serves as ensuring evidence for you to take legal recourse in the future if need calls for, in cases of dispute with the landlord. This builds as the prime reason for clauses included in the rent agreement being important and to be careful of. The importance of clauses differs between tenant and landlord with a common purpose of not prejudicing each other’s rights in relation to the leased premise. The important clauses when it comes to tenants have been provided hereunder:

  1. The clause dealing with payment of bills and other charges: Payment of bills becomes one of the major concerns for tenants when they enter into a rental relationship with the landlord. This instead of not being carefully dealt with backfires on the tenant himself. The laid down time period and associated regulations governing the payment of bills and charges should be put focused on. 
  2. The clause dealing with security deposit: While this comes as an addition to the previous point, a security deposit denotes a fixed amount of money which the landlord generally takes (equal to rent of the first two months) from the tenant for the latter’s period of stay. The tenant should clearly know the amount to be paid as a security deposit alongside all other charges (including electricity, water, and maintenance), that he needs to pay. 
  3. The clause relating to frequency and date of rent payments: The essence of a rent agreement is the consideration in form of rent paid by the tenant to his landlord. For a tenant to avoid hassles in terms of living in the rented property, communications concerning rent payment must be made with the landlord for the ball in this matter lies completely in the latter’s court. 
  4. Clauses dealing with lease renewal: A prime clause in itself, renewal of the lease is a matter of concern for the tenant when the plan to reside is longer. Often leading to conflicts between the tenant and the landlord, terms and conditions for lease renewal must be expressly communicated between the parties to the rent agreement and ensuring the same is the burden of the tenant. 
  5. Clauses in relation to maintenance of leased property: A self-explanatory point in itself, tenants must be careful about the charges and conditions associated with maintenance of the rented property, for this becomes a source of dispute often. 

When it comes to the landlords, the following clauses hold relevance in a tenancy agreement: 

  1. The clause specifying revision of rent after a specified period of time: As has been stated previously, when it comes to payment of rent, the landlord has control over his tenant. Owing to the same, the burden of collecting timely rent, within the period agreed upon by the parties to the agreement, rests on the landlord. 
  2. The clause dealing with the eviction of tenant: This clause has been mentioned for it gives rise to several issues between the landlord and the tenant. Grounds for eviction of the tenant have to be reasoned and rational on the landlord’s part because it is the landlord who has to prove that the eviction of the tenant was made on justified grounds. 

General issues surrounding the lease 

Primarily, lease agreements should receive a thorough review so as to ensure that there are no issues in the coming future. Nevertheless, some of the many issues that occur during leases have been provided hereunder: 

Maintenance and repair

It is extremely important to mention in your lease deeds who would be responsible for maintenance and repair work. Determining who is responsible for the work as well as the cost of keeping the property in a good condition is mandatory. Further, always determine who is responsible for fixing “normal wear and tear” and for other types of damage, whether intentional or accidental. Ceiling damage like cracks, leakage, water tanks, pipes, etc usually it is the lessor who is pointed finger at for not sealing the roof properly and so on. Generally, it is the landlord who is responsible for the exterior as well as the structural portions of the leased property. Parties are always arguing as to “who” caused the problem and want that the defaulting party should rectify the same. However, they don’t reach an amicable solution most of the time. Therefore, it is important for detailed discussions and negotiation before executing the lease deed to know who shall maintain which part of the leased premises.

Common Area Maintenance (“CAM”) charges

This is in reference to commercial leases. These charges include the expenses incurred for maintaining the common spaces that tenants share in a commercial property. It is the practice of billing the tenants for the landlord’s cost in order to maintain the common areas. If the lessor gets any work done on the property he/she usually asks the lessee to pay for the same. For instance, if the lessor would like to hire a security guard or redoes the entrance pavement then he puts these charges for the lessee to pay. The issue arises because a lot of the time the lessees do not want to pay for the same as it increases their budget. Therefore, detailed discussion and negotiation before entering into a contract would help to know what would come under “Common Area” as well as what would be the CAM charges associated with it.

Unauthorised structure/misuse of the property

When the tenants alter the leased property without the consent of the landlords, issues do arise. In Seethalakshmi Ammal vs Nabeesath Beevi  (2003), the Kerala High Court cited the Apex Court’s judgment on Vipin Kumar vs Roshan Lal Anand (1993) wherein the Court held:

“ In Vipin Kumar vs. Roshan Lal Anand (1993) also the same view was taken by the Apex Court. Here, even against the injunction order from the court, the tenants had done everything without the consent of the landlords and the building has been completely altered. According to the landlord, the value of the building has been decreased even though according to an outsider, its value might have been increased. The Court agreed with the landlords’ contentions and therefore, allowed the petition and eviction was ordered under Section 11(4)(ii). Unlike minor alterations which will not diminish the value of the building, a tenant is not entitled to change or alter the building and structure completely and act as if he is the owner. Here alterations made by the tenants are not disputed. But it is contended that the value has only increased and not decreased. But such alterations changing the flooring, walls, doors and roof are tantamount to the reconstruction of the building. In fact, a new structure has been built in the place of the old tenanted building and tenants have gone beyond their rights as tenants and acted as though they are the owners themselves. As held by the Apex Court, looked from the viewpoint of the landlords, the value of the building has diminished, though in the opinion of others, value has only enhanced. According to us, having regard to the material alterations effected by the tenants herein, the landlord is fully justified in thinking that the tenants have transgressed the limits provided under Section 11(4)(ii) of the Act. In the above view, we are of the opinion that ingredients of Section 11(4)(ii) are satisfied and tenants are liable to be evicted from the building.”

Withholding rent

Sometimes, tenants withhold rent. As a general rule, tenants should not withhold rent and be at risk for eviction. If tenants have a genuine reason for withholding for any charges like repair cost then also the tenants should deposit the rent for the property in a separate escrow account in the same timely manner as per lease terms and inform the landlord that he/she has done this in good faith.

Tenant’s refusal to vacate

Sometimes the tenants refuse to vacate the property and this results in losses for the landlords. In such cases, the landlord can seek eviction from the court. The right and process of eviction varies from state to state. The landlord must give proper notice to the tenant before approaching the court. The notice supplied can make the tenant vacate sometimes rather than undergo the court process of eviction.

Assignment

An assignment is the tenant’s right to transfer his/her leasehold interest in the property to another tenant. When an assignment takes place the new tenant becomes the one responsible to pay the rent to the landlord. Everyone wants flexibility and for this reason, this clause must be negotiated thoroughly before the lease is signed. If the lease deed is not properly drafted then the tenant may be unable to assign its lease and would be financially obligated for the rest of the lease term.

Landlords try to put limitations or restrictions in tenants’ assignment rights. The landlords wish to ensure that the new tenants/assignees are creditworthy and have financial strength. This a lot of times require the submission of numerous documents from the assignees.  The assignment clause should indicate how much advance notice is required to assign a lease; limitations on a landlord’s right to reject an assignment; and whether an assignment relieves the assigning tenant of all of its obligations under the lease.

Conclusion

A lease agreement contains all the terms and conditions for the use and occupation of the leased property. It may be written or oral, however, people mostly wish to have a written agreement. It must be very well discussed, and negotiated and must be detailed covering all the “Ifs and but” scenarios to the best possible way. This would avoid any potential dispute in future. Assistance from a legal expert is recommended.

References

  1. https://www.ijlmh.com/paper/a-study-on-lease-and-its-kinds-under-the-transfer-of-property-act-1882/.
  2. https://globaljournals.org/GJMBR_Volume14/4-The-Impact-of-Leasing-Decisions.pdf.

Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/lawyerscommunity

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Types of industrial disputes

0

This article is written by Pragya Agrahari of Amity Law School, Lucknow. This article provides a  detailed analysis of types of industrial disputes, the machinery provided to settle disputes and the methods that can be employed to resolve such disputes.

This article has been published by Sneha Mahawar.​​ 

Table of Contents

Introduction

Around three centuries ago, the concept of ‘industrialisation’ came into existence, which has, in one way or the other, transformed the lifestyle of the people and contributed to the overall economic growth and development of society. It has simplified various works of the people, which earlier requires laborious efforts. But in addition to these benefits, it also paves the way for industrial disputes. Generally, where there is an industry, there has always been a conflict of interest between the management and the workers. The management or administration focuses on profit maximisation, whereas the workers expect healthy wages, reasonable facilities and good conditions of work. Therefore, industrial disputes are inevitable.

For the progress and development of the country, industrial peace and harmony must be restored. Therefore, every country tries to maintain good relations between the employer and the employee. In India, these objectives were accomplished through the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. This Act provides for the investigation and settlement of industrial disputes.

Industrial dispute under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Industrial disputes refer to disagreements or conflicts of interest between the management and the worker or among members of management and the workers themselves. The subject matter of the dispute can be related to any conditions of employment such as wages, bonuses, promotions, working hours, holidays, etc. Usually, industrial disputes occurred between the employer and employee, who were represented through their trade unions respectively. This dispute can be connected to them in any manner, either individually or collectively.

According to the Section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, industrial disputes refer to “any dispute or difference between employers and employers, or between employers and workmen, or between workmen and workmen, which is connected with the employment or non-employment or the terms of employment or with the conditions of labour, of any person.”

In the case of Workmen of Dimakuchi Tea Estate v. Management of Dimakuchi Tea Estate (1958), this definition of the industrial dispute has been divided into the following three parts by the Supreme Court:

  1. Factum of the dispute,
  2. Parties to the dispute,
  3. The subject matter of the dispute.

Factum of the dispute

“Industrial dispute” means the real and substantial difference between the parties having an element of persistence and which can endanger the industrial peace of the community if not resolved timely. It means the dispute must be definite and related to the terms and conditions of employment or non-employment of the person. The concerned parties should be directly interested in such a dispute. 

Parties to the dispute

Section 2(k) of the Act enumerates three pairs that could be parties to any industrial dispute:

  1. employers and employers,
  2. employers and workmen, or
  3. workmen and workmen.

Usually, an industrial dispute occurs between an employee and an employer. But in order to widen the scope of the definition of industrial dispute, disputes between two employees and two workmen have also been included. However, disputes between workmen and workmen are rare. 

The subject matter of the dispute

According to Section 2(k) of the Act, industrial disputes may be connected to the following issues: 

  1. the employment or non-employment,
  2. the terms of employment, or 
  3. the conditions of labour of any person.

If the dispute does not relate to these three categories, it will not fall within the ambit of an industrial dispute.

Employment or non-employment

This includes issues related to the appointment, suspension, discharge, termination, or reinstatement of the workmen. 

Terms of the employment

It includes all the matters covered by the contract of employment, which a workman agrees to before appointing into any service. It may include wages, all types of allowances, working hours, bonuses, holiday leaves, sickness benefits, superannuation, promotion criteria, dismissal, or retrenchment procedures.

Conditions of labour

It will include all the conditions of the employment, like the type of work, environmental conditions, facilities, etc.

Major categories of industrial disputes

Industrial disputes can be categorised into four major types, which are as follows:

  1. Interest disputes, 
  2. Grievance or rights disputes, 
  3. Unfair labour practices disputes, and 
  4. Recognition disputes.

Interest disputes

Interest disputes are also known as economic disputes or conflicts of interest. These disputes arise due to differences in opinion regarding changes in terms of employment, etc. Generally, these types of disputes arise when employees represented through their trade unions, bargain with their employers regarding changes in terms of employment, including increases in wages, job security, fringe benefits, etc. A dispute occurs when trade unions fail to negotiate with the employers or negotiations fail to reach an agreement. These disputes are often settled through conciliation proceedings.

Grievance or rights disputes

Grievance disputes are also known as legal disputes or conflicts of rights. These disputes arise due to non-fulfilment or infringement of the rights of the worker or workers by an employer. Usually, workers protest against the action of the management, which has violated their legitimate rights. Such rights can be related to issues like timely payment of wages, promotion, dismissal or transfer of workers, and certain other benefits, including retirement benefits, seniority benefits, etc. It includes disputes involving the interpretation and application of existing agreements or regulations. If such grievances are left unsettled, it often results in bitter management-labour relations, which severely affects industrial peace. The government often encourages voluntary arbitration for the settlement of such disputes.

Unfair labour practices disputes

Unfair labour practices disputes are the most common industrial disputes. These disputes occur due to unfair labour practices exercised by employers against their employees. ‘Unfair labour practices’ are enumerated in Schedule V of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. This Act strictly prohibits any of such practices employed by either management or the labours under Section 25T and provides punishment for any such practices employed under Section 25U.

Unfair labour practices refer to discriminatory or unethical treatment towards employees which can include the following:

  1. restricting them from being members of any trade union or 
  2. restricting them from participating in any of the activities of the union, 
  3. forcing them to agree on unfair agreements through violent or non-violent means, 
  4. refusing to bargain, 
  5. employing new employees during strikes,
  6. framing wrong charges against them,
  7. discharging or dismissing them unfairly without any reason,
  8. making wrongful efforts to put an end to legal strikes like signing good conduct bond as a precondition to allowing them to work,
  9. showing favouritism in appointment or promotion,
  10. failure to implement award or settlement, etc.

The Industrial Disputes Act provides various methods to resolve such types of disputes such as conciliation or arbitration.

Recognition disputes

Recognition disputes occur when the management refuses to recognise a trade union for the purposes of negotiating conflicts through collective bargaining with the employees. There can be a variety of causes why the management refuses to recognise a particular trade union, such as a lack of a sufficient number of representatives in a trade union or the presence of multiple trade unions, each demanding recognition and struggling for the same issue. These disputes also occur when the management personally dislikes a particular trade union. Then the management refuses to recognise and negotiate with such a trade union which leads to the victimisation of employees connected with such trade unions. Recognition disputes are settled based on the guidelines made by the government for the recognition of trade unions.

Individual disputes

Before the Industrial Dispute (Amendment) Act, 1965, a dispute concerning only an individual workman is not considered an industrial dispute. The courts also excluded them from the definition of industrial dispute. There were three different opinions prevalent at that time in regard to the individual dispute:

  1. The individual dispute (i.e., the dispute between an employer and a single workman) cannot be an industrial dispute,
  2. The individual dispute can be an industrial dispute,
  3. Individual disputes cannot be per se called industrial disputes but may become one if it is represented by a trade union or group of workmen.

In the case of The Newspapers Ltd v. the State Industrial Tribunal, U.P. (1957), this controversy was set to rest by the Supreme Court as it held that the dispute between an employer and a single workman does not fall under the definition of industrial dispute. But if that single workman shares the common cause with the body of workmen or a considerable section of them, the individual dispute can also be considered an industrial dispute. 

This position of the court has been overturned in the case of Workmen of M/S Dharampal Premchand (1966), where it was held that an individual dispute could not be regarded as an industrial dispute unless espoused by his own trade union or a substantial number of workmen. It means the workmen who were not supported by any trade union will not get any remedy for the dispute. This case caused hardships for various workmen who failed to get represented by trade unions.

To end this controversy and mitigate this issue, Section 2A was added through the Industrial Dispute (Amendment) Act, 1965. According to this Section, individual disputes related to ‘dismissal, discharge, retrenchment or termination’ of the workman will now be called industrial disputes. It is no more necessary for an individual dispute to be taken up by any trade union or a considerable number of workmen. The objective behind this amendment is that the workman should not be left at the mercy of trade unions to get justice on certain matters.

Causes of industrial disputes

Economic causes

Demand for higher wages and allowances

The ultimate aim of why workers work in various industries is to earn their living and meet their economic requirements. When these workers realise that current rates of wages do not fulfil their needs, they demand an increase in wage rates and other allowances from the management. On the other hand, the main aim of the management is to increase its profits and therefore, they reject the workmen’s demand for higher wages. This conflict of interest between the management and the workmen creates tussles between them, leading to an industrial dispute. In India, it is one of the most common causes of industrial disputes.

Demand for bonus

Demand for bonuses by workers accounts for many industrial disputes in India. Workmen wanted to have a greater share in the profits earned by the industry, but the management did not accept their demand which caused industrial disputes.

Issues related to working hours

Many times industrial disputes occur due to conflict in fixing reasonable working hours for the workmen. When workers do not agree to the management’s standards of working hours, a dispute arises between them. 

Issues related to working conditions and safety

Workmen do expect not only fair wages or reasonable working hours but also safe working conditions with required equipment installed or safety measures taken to provide enabling conditions for the workmen. It also includes providing various other facilities like a canteen, clean toilets, clean drinking water, proper lighting, etc. 

Modernisation of machinery

Industrial disputes also occur due to modernisation and the introduction of automated machinery in industries, which leads to the replacement of manual labour in the industry. Workers often go on strikes or go slow in order to show their resistance to the management, which ultimately results in industrial disputes.

Leaves and paid leaves

Sometimes, workmen were forced to take leaves due to certain unavoidable circumstances or accidents that occurred in their families or surroundings. In this case, the management cut their wages for the days they were absent from work. This causes disputes between the management and the workmen. 

Gratuity, pension, and other benefits

Some industrial disputes occur as a result of the demand of employees for payment of pension, gratuity and other benefits.

Managerial causes

Non-recognition of trade unions

Many times, employers refused to recognise the trade unions which were representing the workmen in several disputes. The management of the industry is usually suspicious about the workers’ involvement with their trade unions. Therefore, they always try to prevent them from joining any trade union or uniting to form a new trade union. Employers do not recognise their trade unions for representing them or deliberately recognise the rival union so that their demands cannot be accomplished. 

Non-enforcement of the agreements

Before joining work in the industry, the workers and the employers enter into various agreements to decide on various issues related to work. But the employers, on various occasions, violate these agreements or do not enforce agreements as per such contracts. This leads to violation of the rights given to the workers and workers often start opposing the decisions taken by employers, which ultimately results in industrial disputes. 

Ill-treatment of the workers

Various authorities in the industry, such as managers or supervisors, show their superiority to the workers by dominating or treating them badly. The workers represented by their trade unions oppose ill-treatment by the employers, which leads to conflict between the two parties.

Corrupt recruitment procedures

The management, in order to accomplish their selfish goals, employs corrupt practices in recruiting workers in the industry. Sometimes, workers are recruited through bribed middlemen or sometimes, workers are recruited based on favouritism or biases. Even after recruitment, such corrupt practices are also employed in the transfer, promotion, or training of the workers.

Victimisation or wrongful termination of workers

Many employers follow the policy of ‘Hire and fire’, which means there is no security of a job for the workers. They are employed for some purpose, and after fulfillment of that purpose, they are fired without any reason. Workers are terminated or retrenched due to the downfall in the industry. Workers who actively participate in the affairs of trade unions also face dismissal or termination before in preference. 

Political causes

Political influence

Political parties or leaders often use various industrial issues as their election propaganda. They instigate the management against workers or trade unions against the management to fulfill their selfish political motives. This leads to industrial disharmony and several industrial disputes.

Government’s support for management

The ruling government often supports the management of the industry for their own political agendas. Due to this, negotiations between the workers and the management fails, which gives rise to industrial disputes. 

Trade union movements

The workers of the industry, on many occasions, are involved in various trade union movements meant to improve working conditions or provide various facilities to the workers in the industry. Due to these movements, several conflicts between the management and the workers arise, leading to industrial disputes.  

Internal conflicts between trade unions

Many times, conflicts emerge between the members of the trade union on several issues, which leads to disruption in industrial peace. 

Outcomes of industrial disputes

Strike

Usually, when workers’ demands are not accepted by the management of the industry, they go on strike. It is a way through which workers put pressure on the management by stopping their work or protesting against their employers until their demands get fulfilled.

According to Section 2(q) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, a strike means “a cessation of work by a body of persons employed in any industry acting in combination or a concerned refusal, or a refusal under a common understanding, of any number of persons who are or have been so employed to continue to work or to accept employment.” 

Strikes can be of various types:

  1. General strike: These are strikes which are conducted on a mass level to raise certain demands before the employer.
  2. Go slow strike: In this strike, workers do not stop themselves from working in the industry but they do the work very slowly so that employers will earn less profit.
  3. Hunger strike: This strike involves workers going on fast till their demands get fulfilled. It is one of the most common forms of strike. 
  4. Economic strike: This strike involves opposition of the employers by the workers on certain economic issues such as low wages, demand for bonuses, paid leaves, etc. 
  5. Work-to-rule strike: This strike also does not involve stoppage of work by the workers but working strictly according to the rules written in the rulebook. No extra work or overtime work is done by the workers.
  6. Stay-in strike: In this type of strike, workers do not absent themselves from the working premises but do not work in the industry. They just stay in the premises without doing any work.
  7. Sympathetic strike: This strike does not involve any issue of the workers themselves who are protesting. This strike starts to show sympathy towards the workers of other departments or industries and to put pressure on their employers.

Lockout

When there is a dispute between the employer and the workers, employers often close the place of employment for a temporary period in order to put pressure on their workers to stop protests. This is called a lockout. It is the reverse of a strike, which is done by workers against employers.

According to Section 2(l) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, lockout means “means the temporary closing of a place of employment, or the suspension of work, or the refusal by an employer to continue to employ any number of persons employed by him.”

Machinery for settlement of industrial disputes

Industrial peace is the backbone of the country’s economic system, which is disrupted by various types of industrial disputes that occur between employers and workmen. The main aim of the Industrial Dispute Act is to provide machinery for the settlement of these disputes.

There are seven major types of machinery provided under the Act to settle and investigate several industrial disputes based on their intensity or severity, which are as follows:

  1. Works Committee (Section 3)
  2. Conciliation Officer (Section 4)
  3. Board of Conciliation (Section 5)
  4. Courts of Enquiry (Section 6)
  5. Labour Courts (Section 7)
  6. Tribunal (Section 7A)
  7. National Tribunal (Section 7B)

Works committees

Section 3 of the Act provides for the constitution of a works committee by the employer in the industrial establishment consisting of 100 or more workmen. This committee will consist of representatives of the employer and workmen, provided that the number of representatives of workmen should not be less than the number of representatives of the employer. The main duty of the committee is to promote good employer-employee relations and to discuss matters of common interest.

Conciliation officers

Section 4 provides for the appointment of conciliation officers by the appropriate Government either for a specified area or industry. The main duty of the Conciliation Officer is to mediate between the two parties and promote the settlement of the industrial dispute by conciliation or other techniques. The conciliation officer has the power to investigate disputes and is required to submit the report to the appropriate government in a manner or time prescribed.

Board of conciliation

Section 5 of the Act provides for the constitution of the Board of Conciliation by the appropriate Government for promoting the settlement of industrial disputes. This Board will consist of an independent person as Chairman and 2 or 4 other members as representatives of employer and workmen. The representatives of employers and workmen should be in equal numbers. Board also has the power to investigate the dispute and is required to submit the report to the appropriate Government.

Court of enquiry

Section 6 of the Act provides for the constitution of a court of enquiry by the appropriate Government to enquire into matters connected with industrial disputes. This Court should consist of independent persons as its members and in case of more than one member, one independent person is to be appointed as Chairman. 

Labour Courts

Section 7 of the Act provides for the constitution of Labour Courts by the appropriate Government. These Labour Courts will adjudicate on the matters specified under Schedule 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, which are also known as ‘rights disputes’. Labour Courts shall constitute one person as presiding officer to be appointed by the appropriate Government. The main duty of the Court is to provide expeditious and amicable settlement of industrial disputes.

Tribunals

Section 7A of the Act provides for the constitution of Labour Tribunals by the appropriate Government, to adjudicate on the matters specified under either Schedule 2 or Schedule 3 of the Industrial Disputes Act. The matters provided under Schedule 3 are also known as ‘interest disputes’. shall constitute one person as presiding officer to be appointed by the appropriate Government. The tribunal shall constitute one person as presiding officer to be appointed by the appropriate Government. It has much broader functions than labour courts and the same duties as those of labour courts.

National tribunals

Section 7B of the Act provides for the constitution of National Tribunals by the Central Government. The national tribunal shall adjudicate upon industrial matters of national importance or disputes involving industries situated in two or more states. It also consists of one person as presiding officer to be appointed by Central Government.

Methods utilised to resolve industrial disputes

Industrial disputes can be resolved through any of the methods of amicable settlement such as negotiation, conciliation, mediation or arbitration. Mostly, industrial disputes are civil in nature, which can be compromised between the parties to restore peace and harmony in the industrial premises. So the parties should try to negotiate problems between them in non-violent ways or through a system of collective bargaining. The most important thing is that these disputes must be resolved as early as possible to prevent further disruption in industrial peace. 

Collective bargaining

Negotiation is one of the best methods to resolve industrial disputes. It is done between employers and workers through a process called collective bargaining. Collective bargaining is a process of negotiation between the representatives of employers and workers on the terms of employment or other conditions of labour. The major focus of these negotiations is to reach to an agreement on certain conflicting interests of both parties. It is a collective effort to achieve a common goal through peaceful means.

Conciliation

Conciliation is a method of resolving disputes between the management and the workmen through an independent and neutral third party known as a conciliator. A conciliator brings both parties together to discuss and negotiate their issues peacefully. The main aim of this process is to alleviate further differences or conflicts between them. A conciliator helps them in negotiation and guides them in solutions to their problems. The Industrial Dispute Act provides for the Conciliator officers and Board of Conciliators for amicable settlement of industrial disputes. 

Mediation

Mediation is one of the most popular methods of resolving disputes in India. It involves negotiations between two parties who are unable to find solutions to their issues or unable to come to equal terms. It also involves a neutral third party known as a mediator who plays an important role in collecting information, assessing a situation or suggesting solutions to resolve the dispute. Both mediation and conciliation are advisory in nature and not binding on the parties.

Arbitration

Arbitration is a method which parties resort to when other methods of dispute resolution fail. Just like conciliation and mediation, arbitration also involves the help of an impartial third party, called an arbitrator, in resolving industrial disputes. But unlike conciliation and mediation, arbitration is judicial in nature and not only advisory. An arbitration award is binding in nature. Industrial Disputes Act also provides for compulsory and voluntary arbitration for the settlement of industrial disputes. Parties can refer their disputes to arbitration by an agreement between the employer and employees.

Conclusion

Good management-employee relation is necessary to keep industrial peace and harmony alive, which is necessary for any country’s economic growth and development. Good industrial relation depends upon mutual understanding between the management and the workers. When this understanding between them disrupts, it leads to several types of industrial disputes, such as disputes on rights, disputes on interests, disputes related to unfair labour practices or recognition disputes. Each dispute has solutions to it. There are many dispute resolution machinery functioning in the country that provides expedient and amicable settlement of disputes. But it must be understood that disputes will always lead to conflicts and disruption in industrial peace, so it is important to resolve these disputes as early as possible by employing any of the methods provided by the amicable settlement of disputes.

Frequently asked questions

What are the salient features of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947?

The important features of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 are as follows:

  1. The main objective of the Act is to provide machinery for the settlement and investigation of industrial disputes,
  2. Industrial dispute includes conflict between employer and employee about the terms and conditions of the employment,
  3. The Act provides for several authorities to be constituted or established for the settlement of disputes and for maintaining good relations between employer and employee,
  4. It provides provisions for the reference of industrial disputes to the concerned authorities, including individual disputes,
  5. It provides the procedure for the settlement of disputes through conciliation, arbitration or other techniques,
  6. The Act provides a procedure for imposing legal strikes or lockouts and for having valid layoffs and retrenchments,
  7. It prohibits any type of unfair labour practices and provides penalties for its contravention. 

What is the penalty for indulging in unfair labour practices?

According to Section 25U of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, any person who commits unfair labour practices shall be liable for imprisonment of upto six months or a fine up to one thousand rupees or both. 

What is Schedule 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947?

Schedule 2 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 consists of the following issues:

  1. The legality of the order passed by the employer under the standing order of the industry,
  2. Interpretation and application of standing orders,
  3. Discharge and dismissal of workmen and relief,
  4. Withdrawal of customary privileges,
  5. The legality of the strike or lockout,
  6. Other matters not specified in Schedule 3. 

References


Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/lawyerscommunity

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Krishna Veni Nagam v. Harish Nagam AIR 2017 SC 1345 : case analysis

0

This article is written by Vaishnavi Choudhary, 1st Year LLB Student of Intellectual Property Law at RGSOIPL, IIT Kharagpur.

This article has been published by Sneha Mahawar.​​ 

Introduction

The petition filed in this case is regarding the transfer of a divorce petition filed by the respondent-husband in the Family Court of Jabalpur. The petitioner–wife has asked for the transfer of proceedings from the Family Court of Jabalpur to the Family Court of Hyderabad. We discuss herein further, on what grounds the plea for the transfer can be accepted. 

Facts of the case

  1. The couple, Krishna Veni Nagam and Harish Nagam got married in 2008 at Kukatpally, Hyderabad. They were blessed with a girl child in 2009. 
  2. In 2012, the petitioner-wife left her matrimonial home in Jabalpur, where she was subjected to mental and physical torture. She even suffered an injury to the spinal cord. 
  3. Upon this, the respondent-husband applied for the restitution of conjugal rights which was later dismissed as withdrawn. 
  4. The petitioner–wife filed a domestic violence case in Hyderabad, while the husband filed a divorce petition in Jabalpur. 
  5. The petitioner–wife claimed that she stayed with her parents and a minor daughter in Hyderabad and it is difficult for her to travel long distances and attend the proceedings at the Family Court of Jabalpur, where the divorce petition was filed. 
  6. Moreover, she sensed a threat to her security in attending proceedings at Jabalpur.
  7. Therefore, a transfer petition was filed by the petitioner-wife for the transfer of the petition from the Family Court, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh to the Family Court Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh.

Legal Issues 

  1. What are the acceptable grounds for a transfer petition to be filed in a matrimonial matter?
  2. Can video conferencing be used in conducting matrimonial proceedings as an alternative to transferring petitions through jurisdictions?

Legal History

This particular issue of jurisdiction has come up quite often in matrimonial matters. In most cases, the doctrine of forum non-conveniens was applied by the courts to take a decision, which allows the courts to dismiss a case where another court, or forum, is much better suited to hear the case. 

However, the decisions of the courts in this matter have evolved. This case forms a part of one such decision wherein the convenience of the parties plays a major role in the rulings. The history of judgments in this particular area has gone from giving preference to the wife’s convenience in deciding the jurisdiction of the proceedings, to making the husband deposit for the expenses of the wife’s travel and stay during the time of proceedings, to deciding that no burden should be imposed on either party for the expenses during the proceedings, to utilizing the facility of video – conferencing for conducting the proceedings to make it equally convenient for both parties. 

Summary of the arguments

The petitioner–wife, who was the respondent in the case of the divorce petition claimed that since it is physically difficult as well as unsafe for her to attend the proceedings of the concerning divorce petition, a transfer of the divorce petition matter to the nearest court to the place where she lived that is, in the Hyderabad, should be granted by the court. 

The two statutes under which the petitioner side has based their case are Section 19 of the Hindu Marriage Act and Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code. 

It was argued by the petitioner that under Section 19 of the Hindu Marriage Act which gives the preference to the respondent, or the wife in case she is facing hardship in traveling to the place of filing, in case of deciding the jurisdiction of the petition, the divorce petition should have been filed at the location where the respondent-wife resided at the time of the filing, which is at Hyderabad.

The petitioner also argued that under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure transfer of such proceedings can be initiated.

Judgment

The honorable Supreme Court in this case allowed the transfer of the petition from Family Court, Jabalpur to Family Court, Hyderabad looking at the pendency and the situation in this case. However, the Court set a few checks on the circumstances under which such transfer petitions should be allowed and also gave alternatives for the same. 

The court was primarily of the view that entertaining such transfer petitions for all the cases which come to the court, will cause a delay in the process of justice which were otherwise to be dealt with expeditiously. The court referred to the judgment in Anindita Das v. Srijit Das, 2006, in which it was observed that default and hidden bias towards the wives in deciding the jurisdiction of filing the petition, was taken advantage of by women even in the case of no genuine issues present. 

As an exemplar taken from these earlier cases, the amicus curiae, in this case, learned senior Counsel Shri C. A Sundaram suggested that Section 19 of the Hindu Marriage Act should be interpreted in a way such that the transfer of petitions in matrimonial cases to a place other than where the wife is residing, should be allowed only under situations where “..the wife is employed and the husband is unemployed or where the husband suffers from physical or other handicap or is looking after the minor child”. 

The court further observed that unless otherwise, in a case where the husband filed a petition in a place away from the wife’s place of residence, he should pay for the expenses of travel and stay in a 3-star hotel for the wife and one individual accompanying her to the place of the proceedings. In case, the husband has genuine problems in making the deposit, proceedings can be conducted through video-conferencing. 

The understanding of the court in this particular case said that the interest of justice ought to be kept in mind at all times, and the mere convenience of the parties cannot be the deciding factor. 

In this decision, Supreme Court has come up with some directions for various authorities with the power to make the process of delivering justice smoother and hassle-free:

  1. The Supreme Court asked all High Courts to issue appropriate administrative instructions to maintain and regulate the use of video conferencing for a certain category of cases. 
  2. It also directed the Legal Aid Committee of every district to make available a selected panel of advocates who are ready to provide service as a part of legal aid. 
  3. Every district court must have at least one e-mail id. A designated district court officer may suitably respond to e-mails from the litigants located outside the court’s local jurisdiction, regarding any administrative instructions. 
  4. Similarly, an information officer in every district court may be accessible on a notified telephone during notified hours as per the instructions. 

The Court stated that in cases of matrimonial matters wherein the parties stay outside the jurisdiction of the courts, the courts shall incorporate certain safeguards to avoid denial of justice for either party. 

“The safeguards can be:

  1. Availability of video conferencing facility.
  2. Availability of legal aid service.
  3. Deposit of cost for travel, lodging, and boarding in terms of Order XXV Code of Civil Procedure.
  4. E-mail address/phone number, if any, at which the litigant from our station may communicate.”

Analysis

The judgment in this particular case posed as a precedent solving the problem of flooding of transfer petitions in matrimonial disputes unlike the other cases regarding the issue till now. In the previous cases that the courts have seen in this matter, the decision has always favored the wives in the sense that the position of the wives in the matter should be made safer and more comfortable. For example, in the cases like Sumita Sing v. Kumar Sanjay, 2002, Rajini Kishor Pardeshi v. Kishor Babulal Pardeshi, 2005, and others, the courts, while deciding the transfer petitions in matrimonial matters, have given more weightage and consideration to the convenience of the female litigants and have allowed the transfer of proceedings taking into consideration their convenience.

However, there have been several cases that have been decided against the video-conferencing methodology, which the honorable Supreme Court has suggested in this particular case, for hearing the proceedings instead of transferring the petition. In the case of Santhini v. Vijay Venkatesh, the court overruled the judgment given in Krishna Veni Nagam v. Harish Nagam saying that the court in any case, under an acceptable procedure, cannot order video-conferencing until and unless there is a joint application from both parties seeking consent by video conferencing. Moreover, the court clearly stated that video conferencing cannot be directed in a transfer petition. Since this was a 3-judge bench as compared to Krishna Veni Nagam v. Harish Nagam which had a 2-judge bench, it set a prevailing law.

In my opinion, this judgment has set a good example for the judges to make decisions in cases of matrimonial petition transfers but has not been given as much importance in future judgments, as much as it should have been. The judgment highlighted two very important points – firstly, that the decision in such cases should be taken gender-neutrally keeping in mind the interest of justice of both parties and without giving an unreasonable favor to the wives; secondly, in case a transfer is not possible to the desired jurisdiction, then the court may suggest that the parties go ahead with the proceedings on video-conferencing.

I agree with the judgment on various levels. Firstly, how the cases related to transfer petitions in matrimonial matters are almost mechanical. The courts have, time and again favored the wives in deciding these cases, and they have made sure that it’s convenient for the wives to attend the proceedings. It is observed that even to date, the precedent of Krishna Veni Nagam v. Harish Nagam is not followed very satisfactorily in the cases of transfer petitions. However, it has been observed, that many female litigants take advantage of the fact that they are given priority in deciding the jurisdiction of the proceedings. Therefore, the courts need to take into consideration the hardships faced by the husbands as well, to make just decisions. Both parties should be given equal preferences based on the fair evaluation of their physical, economical, and emotional distress. This is important to make sure that the husband doesn’t bear all the inconveniences – monetary as well as physical, on a default basis.

Secondly, the decision of the Supreme Court, in this case, was a wise decision considering the number of transfer petitions flooding the courts in matters of matrimonial discords. However, it was later on overruled in Santhini v. Vijay Venkatesh. In addition to maintaining a speedy approach to resolving these conflicts, it also aids in advancing the interest of justice by not burdening either party with traveling or aiding the travel of the other. 

In the recent case of Anjali Bramhawar Chauhan v. Navin Chauhan, which was decided during the time of the Covid-19 pandemic, it was decided that, in case of a transfer petition, proceedings can be held through video-conferencing. This is a good alternative to physical proceedings in a situation like today, where our courts have a multitude of cases to deal with. Moreover, as every field of society is following the smart approach with the help of technological advancements, it is good to incorporate those advancements in legal proceedings as well. The only thing is that proper guidelines should be followed during the virtual proceedings and it should be made sure that it does not hamper the process of justice delivery.

Conclusion

Citizens are losing their faith in the judiciary as courts sit on a ticking time bomb of pending cases. Experience has shown that other courts, besides the Supreme Court and several High Courts, are unable to hear a significant proportion of cases online. While dispensing justice based on facts, the Supreme Court’s directives must be gender-neutral in intent. If it is determined that the Supreme Court’s power was used to harass, it will be penalized and a divorce will be granted. It is wise to remove any barriers that prevent the courts from dispensing justice in a gender-neutral manner in an era where marriage and divorce occur at the speed of light.


Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/lawyerscommunity

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now
logo
FREE & ONLINE 3-Day Bootcamp (LIVE only) on

How Can Experienced Professionals Become Independent Directors

calender
28th, 29th Mar, 2026, 2 - 5pm (IST) &
30th Mar, 2026, 7 - 10pm (IST).
Bootcamp starting in
Days
HRS
MIN
SEC
Abhyuday AgarwalCOO & CO-Founder, LawSikho

Register now

Abhyuday AgarwalCOO & CO-Founder, LawSikho