Download Now
Home Blog Page 293

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016

0

This article is written by Akshaya V, pursuing LLB from CMR University, School of Legal Studies. This article is an effort to simplify the concept and working of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 through the coverage of important provisions and stipulations including an analysis of the Act.

It has been published by Rachit Garg.

Table of Contents

Introduction

The real estate sector is an important component of the economy and plays a catalytic role in meeting the country’s housing and infrastructure needs and demands. While this sector has grown significantly in recent years, it has been largely under-regulated with the absence of standardisation and lack of adequate buyer protection. Though the Consumer Protection Act of 2019 provides a forum for real estate buyers to address their concerns, the option is only curative and does not adequately address all the problems of buyers and promoters in that sector. The absence of uniformity has been a constraint to the healthy and orderly growth of the industry. Therefore, the need for regulating the sector has been accentuated in various forums. 

History of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016

The real estate sector was struggling as there were no rigid laws governing the same. The need of the hour was to appoint a comprehensive regulatory body to govern the same. The 2009 conference of National Housing Development and Municipal Administration Ministers discussed affordable housing for all including land-use policies, financial strengthening of local public bodies and a road map for hovel free cities. To address the issues of land valuation system and urban development regulation, the discussion also included the creation of a draft Real Estate bill by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation. In July 2011, the Ministry of Law and Justice suggested that the legislation is part of the concurrent list of the Indian Constitution. Later, on 14 August 2013, the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Bill was introduced in Rajya Sabha. The Union Cabinet approved twenty substantial Amendments to the bill in December 2015, based on Rajya Sabha Committee recommendations. The law was then passed by the Rajya Sabha on March 10, 2016, and the Lok Sabha on March 15, 2016. The Parliament enacted the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, herein referred to as the RERA Act, which aims to protect the rights and interests of consumers by minimising the malpractices done by the developers and promoting uniformity business practices and transactions in the real estate sector. The RERA Act came into effect on and from 1 May, 2016. At the time of passing of the Act, only 69 out of 90 Sections were notified and all other provisions were effective on and from 1 May 2017. On 31st October 2016, the centre, through the Housing & Urban Poverty Alleviation Ministry, released the general rules of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The Act was legislated under entry 6 and entry 7 of the concurrent list of the Indian Constitution

Scope and applicability of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016

The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, hereinbelow referred to as the ‘Act’ applies to the whole of India except Jammu and Kashmir. Provisions of the RERA Act apply to residential apartments, buildings and plots whether residential or commercial. The Real Estate Project defined in the Act includes the development of buildings consisting of apartments, converting existing buildings into apartments and developing  land into plots for the sale of all or some of the said apartments to carry out the purpose of this Act. Under RERA Act, it is mandatory to register all projects of more than five hundred square metres. The main aspects covered by the RERA Act include all project-related information, contract documents for buying and selling properties, carpet area stipulation, limitation of an advance fee to ten per cent of the apartment a deposit of seventy per cent of the money collected from the buyers in the escrow account, timely completion of the project and penal provisions. Hence, it is imperative to note that the RERA Act is one such comprehensive Act which covers all the projects mentioned above irrespective of whether it is commercial or residential.  

Need for the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016

  1. To control and regulate the real estate sectors by shutting out malpractices;
  2. To keep consumers out of perils such as delayed delivery, transfer of title of the property, the quality of amenities provided and necessary changes to be made etc., before purchase;
  3. To appoint authorities to manage the real estate sector and to establish an Appellate Tribunal for each State. To enable home buyers to file complaints in case of any wrongdoing committed by the builders or developers; 
  4. To contribute a good percentage to India’s GDP;
  5. To create accountability and responsibility for the authorities so appointed;
  6. To tighten the security on the use of investments done by the home buyers or investors;
  7. To have a supreme authorisation on the registration for the projects required to be registered; and
  8. To maintain quality in delivering the project to the buyers as per their interest and give scope for complaints to the authorities in case of any structural defects. 

Importance of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016

Real estate’s working was previously unregulated. The enforcement of RERA intends to protect the buyers or investors and in turn boost their confidence. It requires transparency and authority to keep track of its functioning approach. In reality, it now serves as a spotless ground for buyers as well as reducing the risk of those buyers or investors who bought or invested in the real estate before the implementation of the Act. The Act clarifies the relationship between property buyers and developers. It lays down the process of establishing trust between suppliers and purchasers. It has even created a state agency to oversee real estate and business transactions. The RERA Act is now assisting home buyers in receiving their real estate projects on schedule which is a huge comfort for Indian homebuyers.

Salient features of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016

  1. To regulate and promote the real estate sector by establishing the Real Estate Regulatory Authority. 
  2. To carry out the sale of plots, buildings or apartments as the case may be, or the sale of all the real estate projects transparently and efficiently.
  3. To protect the interests of the consumers and buyers and ensure the prevention of malpractices against them. 
  4. To establish adequate and speedy dispute redressal systems and also establish Appellate Tribunals to hear  and adjudge appeals from the orders, directions or decisions of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority.
  5. Establishes state-level regulatory authorities called RERA. 
  6. To work on residential real estate projects and register all the projects that are to be undertaken without which the promoters cannot promote or sell. 
  7. To cast duties on the promoters to upload details of the project on the website including layout and site plans. 
  8. To ensure that two-thirds of the allottees give their written consent in addition to RERA’s written approval when a promoter has to transfer or assign a majority of the rights and responsibilities in a real estate project to a third party.
  9. To ensure that the buyer or promoter, as the case may be, pays an equal sum in the event of any default.
  10. Where the promoter causes the buyer any loss as a result of other people claiming property (defective title of property) that has been built or is being built, the promoter shall be liable to pay compensation to the buyer. 
  11. To ensure that the money collected from project buyers must be kept in a separate bank account and utilised solely for the construction of the project. This sum is subject to change by the State Government.
  12. The Act provides the right to legal representation on behalf of the client by a CA, CS or CMA or legal practitioners
  13. It imposes a stringent penalty on promoters, and real estate agents and also prescribes imprisonment. 
new legal draft

An overview of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016

  1. State-level regulatory authorities (Section 20) – Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA): The Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) is established at the state level. The Act allows state governments to create multiple regulatory authorities, each with the following mandate:
    • Register and maintain a database of real estate developments and make it available for public inspection on the company’s website; 
    • Protection of interests of promoters, real estate agents, and buyers;
    • A housing development that is both sustainable and affordable; and
    • Provide advice to the government and ensure adherence to the Act and its regulations.
  2. Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (Section 43) – The decision of the Real Estate Regulatory Authorities can be appealed to the tribunals established for each state under the Act including its composition, application for settlement of the dispute, qualifications for chairperson and members, powers of tribunal and vacancies of the Appellate Tribunal.
  3. Mandatory Registration (Section 3) – Regulatory Authorities require all projects with a plot size of at least 500 square metres or eight flats to be registered.
  4. Deposits – Placing 70% of the monies accumulated from the buyer shall be deposited in a separate escrow account dedicated solely for the construction of that project.
  5. Penal interest on default (Section 61) – Both the promoter and the buyer are responsible to pay an equal rate of interest in the event of either party’s default. 
  6. Ceiling on advance payments (Section 13) – Without initially entering into a sale agreement, a promoter cannot receive more than 10% of the cost of the plot, apartment, or building as an advance payment or an application fee from a person.
  7. Punishment (Section 66) – For violations of orders of Appellate Tribunals and Regulatory Authorities, developers can face up to three years in prison while agents and buyers can face up to one year in prison or a fine for every day during which the default continues, which may extend cumulatively extend up to ten per cent of the estimated cost of the plot, apartment or building of the real estate project. 

Important definitions under (Section 2) 

  1. Appropriate Government [Section 2(g)] – “Appropriate government” means in respect of matters relating to,—
    • the Union territory without Legislature, the Central Government,
    • the Union Territory of Puducherry, the Union territory Government, 
    • the Union Territory of Delhi, the Central Ministry of Urban Development, and
    • the State, the State Government.
  2. Appellate Tribunal [Section 2(f)] – “Appellate Tribunal ” means the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal established under Section 43.
  3. Person [Section 2(zg)] – “Person” includes,— 
  4. Planning area [Section 2(zh)] – “Planning area” means a planning area or a development area or a local planning area or a regional development plan area, by whatever name called, or any other area specified as such by the appropriate government or any competent authority and includes any area designated by the appropriate government or the competent authority to be a planning area for future the planned development, under the law relating to town and country planning for the time being in force and as revised from time to time. 
  5. 5. Promoter [Section 2(zk)] – “promoter” means,— 
    • a person who constructs or causes to be constructed an independent building or a building consisting of apartments, or converts an existing building or a part thereof into apartments, for the purpose of selling all or some of the apartments to other persons and includes his assignees, or
    • a person who develops land into a project, whether or not the person also constructs structures on any of the plots, to sell to other persons all or some of the plots in the said project, whether with or without structures thereon, or 
    • any development authority or any other public body in respect of allottees of— 
      1. buildings or apartments, as the case may be, constructed by such authority or body on lands owned by them or placed at their disposal by the government, or 
      2. plots owned by such authority or body or placed at their disposal by the government, for the purpose of selling all or some of the apartments or plots, or
      3. an apex state level co-operative housing finance society and a primary co-operative housing society which constructs apartments or buildings for its members or in respect of the allottees of such apartments or buildings, or 
      4. any other person who acts as a builder, coloniser, contractor, developer, estate developer or by any other name or claims to be acting as the holder of a power of attorney from the owner of the land on which the building or apartment is constructed or plot is developed for sale, or 
      5. such other person who constructs any building or apartment for sale to the general public.
  6. Real Estate Agent [Section 2(zm)] – “real estate agent” means any person, who negotiates or acts on behalf of one person in a transaction of transfer of his plot, apartment or building, as the case may be, in a real estate project, by way of sale, with another person or transfer of a plot, apartment or building, as the case may be, of any other person to him and receives remuneration or fees or any other charges for his services whether as a commission or otherwise and includes a person who introduces, through any medium, prospective buyers and sellers to each other for negotiation for sale or purchase of plot, apartment or building, as the case may be, and includes property dealers, brokers, middlemen by whatever name called.

Responsibilities of the appropriate Government 

  1. Notify the rules for the implementation of this Act, within six months of commencement of this Act
  2. Establish the Real Estate Regulatory Authority, within one year of commencement of this Act, ie., latest by 30th April 2017.
  3. Shall depute an officer, preferably, a housing secretary as an interim regulatory Authority
  4. Establish the Appellate Tribunals within one year from its commencement, ie. , maximum by 30th April 2017.
  5. Identify an existing Appellate Tribunal for the time being established under any other law in force, as the Appellate Tribunal until a full-time Appellate Tribunal is established.
  6. Appoint members of the Appellate Tribunal and the Chairperson and members of the Regulatory Authority based on the suggestions and recommendations of the Selection Committee. 
  7. Appoint employees and other officers of the Regulatory Authority and the Appellate Tribunal.
  8. Identify and establish office space and other infrastructure for its functioning. 
  9. To constitute the Real Estate Regulatory Fund, 2017. 
  10. The Central Government is required to establish the Central Advisory Council.

Projects exempt from the ambit of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016

The following projects do not require to be registered under the Act when:

  1. the area of land does not exceed 500 sq. metres;
  2. the number of apartments does not exceed eight. 
  3. In the case of renovation or repair or re-development:
  4. where the area of land proposed to be developed does not exceed 500 square metres or the number of apartments proposed to be developed does not exceed eight, inclusive of all phases;
  5. where the promoter has received a completion certificate for a real estate project before commencement of this Act;
  6. For renovation or repair or re-development which does not involve marketing, advertising, selling or new allotment of any apartment, plot or building, as the case may be, under the real estate project. 

Application for registration of real estate projects (Section 4)

Every promoter must submit an application to the Authority for registration of the real estate project in the form, manner, and time stipulated by the regulation of the Authority along with the fee specified by the Authority. 

Step 1: An application has to be filed along with the fee and other documents in the prescribed form for registration with RERA by the applicants. 

Step 2: The approval or rejection of the application for registration shall be done within thirty days from the date of receiving the application by the Authority.

Step 3: The promoter of the project shall be provided with a registration number, user ID for login and password for the applicant on successful registration. 

Granting of registration by the authority (Section 5) 

  1. The authority, shall within thirty days from the date of receipt of the application – 
  2. Grant registration of the real estate project subject to the provisions of the Act and issue the applicant a registration number, as well as a Login Id and password, to enable him to access the website of the Authority and create his web page to fill in the details of the proposed project; or 
  3. Reject the registration by rejecting the application if it does not conform to the provisions of the Act and record reasons in writing.

Provided applications cannot be rejected without giving an opportunity of being heard to the applicant.

  1. As per sub-section (1), if the authority does not register the project within thirty days, then the project is deemed to be registered and the promoter shall be given the user ID for login and password for accessing the RERA website and to create his website for uploading the details of the proposed project. 
  2. The registration so granted under this section is valid for the time specified by the promoter in section 4 under sub-clause (c) for the completion of the project.

Extension of registration (Section 6)

  1. There has been a major delay in handing over the project to the buyers by the developers. The Act was promulgated to avoid such delays. Hence, the developer, at the time of registration should specify a timeline during which the project will be handed over to the buyer.
  2. The specification of the timeline is very important because if the project is not handed over within the said time, it may be usurped by the regulator and be revoked.
  3. Under this Section, the discretion solely lies with the regulator to grant an extension of registration.
  4. The regulatory authority may take into account the force majeure conditions or any reasonable circumstance to merit the extension. 
  5. The promoter shall make an application detailing the force majeure or the reasonable circumstances which resulted in the delay in such form and by paying the prescribed fee as the regulatory Authority may specify from time to time. 

Revocation of registration (Section 7)

The Authority may revoke the registration granted under Section 5 after being satisfied that –

  • the promoter fails to do anything required by or under this Act or the rules or regulations made thereunder,
  • the promoter violates any of the terms or conditions of the competent authority’s approval, 
  • the promoter is involved in any unfair practices or irregularities.

The authority, upon the revocation of the registration – 

Debar the promoter and his access to the website with regard to the project he undertook and put his name under the list of defaulters and display his photograph on the website. He shall also inform the other Real Estate Authorities in other States and Union Territories about the revocation so made. 

Lapse on the revocation of registration (Section 8)

When a registration expires or is revoked under this Act, the Authority may consult with the appropriate government to take whatever action it deems appropriate, including completing the remaining development works by a competent authority or an association of allottees, as determined by the Authority. As per the provisions of the Act, the orders, decisions or directions given by the Authority shall not take effect until the period of appeal expires. Where the project is revoked under this Act, the association of allottees will have a preferential right of refusal for proceeding with the remaining development works. 

Registration of real estate agents (Section 9) 

Real estate broking is one of the easiest businesses in India as there are no specific qualifications or experience requirements. Before the onset of RERA, there was no code of practice that set accountability, transparency and professional benchmarks. As we see, in many parts of the country, many non-professional agents or brokers operate without a sense of accountability.  Thus, the RERA Act also covers agents who have to mandatorily register under Section 9, without which a real estate agent or broker cannot facilitate the sale or purchase of any building, plot, or apartment as part of a registered real estate project sold by the promoter in any of the planning areas. Every real estate agent willing to act as one shall apply to the Authority within a prescribed time and in such form and such fee as to be prescribed. The Authority, once satisfied that the provisions of the Act in relation to the agent’s registration shall –  

  1.  provide the real estate agent with a single registration number,
  2.  reject the application in case it does not conform with the provisions of the Act or the rules thereunder with reasons recorded in writing.

Provided that no application shall be denied until the applicant has been allowed to be heard on the issue. The applicant shall be given a reasonable opportunity of being heard in the matter, without which the application cannot be rejected. 

Promoter (Section 12) 

No deposit or advance is to be taken by the promoter without first entering into the agreement for sale (Section 13) A promoter may not accept an advance payment or application fee from a person over ten per cent of the cost of the apartment, plot, or building without first entering into an agreement for sale and registering it.

Structural defect – In case of any structural defect, workmanship defect, quality of delivery, or any provision related to service, or any duty of the promoter, as the case may be, under the agreement for the sale relating to such development, must be brought to the notice of the promoter within five years of the date of handing over possession by the allottee. The promoter is required to rectify such deficiencies without charge within thirty days and in the event of the promoter failing to do so within that period, the aggrieved allottees are entitled to receive suitable compensation in the manner stipulated under the Act.

Obligations of the promoter in case of transfer of a real estate project to a third party (Section 15)The promoter may not transfer or assign his majority rights and liabilities in a real estate project to a third party without the prior written consent of two-thirds of allottees, excluding the promoter, and without the Authority’s prior written approval: Provided that such transfer or assignment shall not affect the erstwhile promoter’s allotment or sale of apartments, plots, or buildings in the real estate project.

Obligations of promoter regarding the insurance of real estate project (Section 16)The promoter shall secure all insurances that may be required by the competent government, including but not limited to insurance in respect of – 

  • Title to the land and buildings that are part of the real estate project; and
  • Real estate project construction.

Transfer of title (Section 17)In a real estate project, the promoter shall execute a registered conveyance deed in favour of the allottee and hand over the physical possession of the plot, apartment, or building, as the case may be, to the allottees, as well as the undivided proportionate title in the common areas to the association of the allottees or the competent authority, as the case may be and hand over the common areas to the association of the allottees or the competent authority. The promoter is bound to comply with the direction of the competent authority, as the case may be, under this provision within three months from the date of issuance of the occupation certificate. 

After obtaining the said occupation certificate and transferring physical possession to the allottees, the promoter is entrusted with the duty to hand over the necessary plans and documents including common areas to the allottees’ association or the competent authority as applicable in accordance with the local laws. Where there are no local laws in place, the promoter shall, within thirty days of receiving the completion certificate, hand over all essential documentation and plans including common areas, to the allottees’ association or the appropriate government, as the case may be.

Return of amount and compensation (Section 18)

If the promoter fails to complete or is unable to give possession of an apartment, plot, or building: 

  1. In accordance with the terms of the agreement for sale or by the date specified therein; and 
  2. Due to discontinuance of his business as a developer due to suspension or revocation of the registration under this Act or for any other reason, he shall be liable on demand to the allottees, in case the allottee wishes to withdraw.

He shall be liable to the allottees on-demand, without prejudice to any other remedy available, to refund the amount received by him in respect of that plot, apartment, building or structure, as the case may be, with interest at such rates and compensation as may be prescribed under this Act. 

Establishment and incorporation of Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Section 20)

Within one year of the date of enactment of this Act, the competent government shall, by notification, create a body to be known as the Real Estate Regulatory Authority to exercise the authorities conferred on it and perform the responsibilities assigned to it under this Act. 

Provided that the appropriate government of two or more states or union territories may, if it so chooses, establish a single authority, provided the relevant government may, if it so desires, establish multiple authorities in a state or union territory:

Provided that until a regulatory authority is established under this Section, the competent government may by order nominate any regulatory authority or any officers, preferably the Secretary of the department dealing with housing as the regulatory authority to discharge the functions under the Act.

Term of office of the Chairperson and members (Section 23)

The Chairperson and Members shall serve for a term of five years from the date of their appointment or until they reach the age of sixty-five years, whichever is earlier and shall not be eligible for re-appointment. Before selecting anybody as a Chairperson or member, the competent government must be satisfied that the person has no financial or other interests that might jeopardise his or her duties as a member. 

Removal of the Chairperson and members from office in certain circumstances (Section 26)

  1. In accordance with the notified procedure under this Act, the appropriate government shall remove the Chairperson or other members from office if either of them – 
    1. has been declared adjudged insolvent,
    2. has been convicted of an offence involving moral turpitude, or 
    3. has become incapable, either physically or mentally to act as a member, or
    4. has got any financial or other interest which may prejudice exercising his power as Chairman or other members. 
  2. The Chairperson or member shall not be removed from office for the reasons specified in clauses (d) or (e) of sub-section (1) unless the appropriate government orders it following an inquiry conducted by a High Court Judge in which the Chairperson or member has been informed of the charges against him and has been given a reasonable opportunity to be heard on those charges.

Powers of the Regulatory Authority 

  1. Power to issue interim orders Section 36 of the Act says when the Authority is satisfied that an act in violation of this Act or the rules and regulations thereunder has been, is being, or is about to be committed, the Authority may, by order, restrain any promoter, allottee, or real estate agent from carrying on such act until the conclusion of the inquiry or until further orders, without giving such party notice, if the Authority deems it necessary. 
  2. Power to issue directionsSection 37 of the Act says the Authority may provide such instructions to the promoters, allottees, or real estate agents, as the case may be, as it deems necessary to carry out its powers under the provisions of this Act or rules or regulations adopted thereunder and such directions shall be binding on all parties concerned.
  3. Power to rectify the orders Section 39 of the Act says the Authority may alter any order passed by it at any time within two years of the date of making of the under this Act, in order to correct any mistake obvious from the record and shall make such amendment if the mistake is brought to his notice by the parties. Provided, no such alteration shall be made in respect of any order to which an appeal under this Act has been filed. Furthermore, the Authority shall not change any substantive portion of its order issued under the provisions of this Act while correcting any mistakes obvious from the record. 

Responsibilities of the Regulatory Authority

  1. To facilitate registering the real estate project and real estate agents. 
  2. To extend the registration of the real estate or project and its revocation. 
  3. To renew or revoke, as the case may be, the registration of the real estate agent.
  4. To maintain a website of records for public reviewing. 
  5. To appoint more than one adjudicating officer for addressing the issues relating to real estate matters.
  6. To notify rules and regulations. 
  7. To recommend for any growth and promotion of healthy and transparent functioning of the project. 

Establishment of Central Advisory Council (Section 41)

The Central Government may establish a Council to be called as the Central Advisory Council by notification, with effect from the date specified in the notification. The ex-officio Chairperson of the Central Advisory Council shall be the Minister of Government of India in charge of the Ministry of the Central Government dealing with housing. It shall consist of representatives from the Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Industry and Commerce, Ministry of Urban Development, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Ministry of Law and Justice, Niti Aayog, National Housing Bank, Housing and Urban Development Corporation, five representatives from State Governments to be selected by rotation and five representatives from Real Estate Regulatory Authorities to be selected by rotation. 

Functions of Central Advisory Council (Section 42)

The Central Advisory Council is purely an advisory organisation with no administrative duties. It has no duty or power to recommend how the Act has to be implemented. As a result, the council’s main objectives are as follows:

  • All matters relating to the implementation of this Act.
  • The policy of the government to be followed for encouraging the Act.
  • How can this Act advance consumer interests and how can the Act help support real estate expansion and other things that have been entrusted to the Central Government.
  • To examine its proposals and create rules to implement them.

Analysis of the effectiveness of the council 

The Central Advisory Council is in charge of predicting and improving the RERA’s implementation efficiency. More importantly, the council must endeavour to improve the real estate sector as it is a significant contributor to the country’s GDP. While the goal has been stated, the following areas must be thoroughly investigated for this council to make a significant change. 

Keeping up the federal spirit – To maximise the efficacy of this Council, it is necessary to have representation from all of the states to avoid leaving any area unrepresented. Currently, the Council is made up of five states that are chosen on a rotational basis. This denies the rest of the states the ability to express their views. The representation should include not just those states that are now doing well in the real estate business, but also those that are not doing so well but have the potential to do so. As a result, state representations should be increased to at least ten to fifteen states.

Representation of environmental concerns – Consumer interests are not restricted to money in real estate, thus environmental issues should be strongly represented on the CAC. Consumers are also interested in environmentally sustainable models, which should be adopted by real estate developers. The CAC may assist in promoting excellent practices in real estate developments, which will motivate promoters to go green and adopt green alternatives while executing such projects. As a result, both the promoters and the consumers will profit from it. 

Regularise interactions – The RERA meetings must be held on a more regular basis to avoid the RERA becoming a “paper tiger.” This will also keep the RERA from becoming more diluted. The most recent meeting took place on May 18, 2018. As a result, laws must be enacted to make the meetings mandatory at least once a year. Regular interaction is required for representations to work.

The Real Estate Appellate Tribunal 

Real Estate Appellate Tribunal is formed by the Appropriate Government under Chapter VII of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 to ensure faster resolution of disputes. Parties aggrieved by the RERA order can appeal before the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal and it has to adjudicate such cases within sixty days. Civil Courts have been prevented from exercising jurisdiction on such matters. If any of the parties is not satisfied with the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal order they can file an appeal against the order of the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal order to the High Court within sixty days. 

Establishment of Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (Section 43)

The appropriate government, shall within one year of commencement of this Act, by notification, establish a Real Estate Appellate Tribunal. There shall be one or more benches of the Appellate Tribunal, for various jurisdictions in the state or union territories, if the appropriate government deems necessary. Every bench of the Appellate Tribunal shall consist of at least one Judicial Member and one Administrative or Technical Member. 

The Act also allows for the establishment of a single appellate tribunal for two or more states or union territories.  The designated tribunal may hear cases until such a tribunal is constituted and once the tribunal is constituted, all the existing cases will be transferred to the newly established common Tribunal. If the appropriate government of two or more states or union territories deems it necessary, may establish a single Appellate Tribunal. 

It may be noted that when a promoter files an appeal with the Appellate Tribunal, it shall not be entertained, without the promoter first having deposited with the Appellate Tribunal at least thirty per cent of the penalty or such higher percentage as may be determined by the Appellate Tribunal or the total amount to be paid to the allottee including interest and compensation imposed on him or with both, as the case may be before the said appeal is heard. 

Application for settlement of disputes and appeals to Appellate Tribunal (Section 44)

Section 44 of the Act deals with applications for settlement of disputes and appeals to the Appellate Tribunal. It provides that: 

  1. The appropriate government or competent authority or any individual aggrieved by the Authority’s or adjudicating officer’s direction, order, or judgement, may appeal to the Appellate Tribunal.
  2. Every appeal under sub-section (1) must be filed within sixty days from the date on which the appropriate government, the competent authority, or the aggrieved person receives a copy of the Authority’s or the adjudicating officer’s direction, order or decision and it must be filed in such form and with such fee as may be prescribed. 

Provided that the Appellate Tribunal may hear any appeal after sixty days term has expired if it is satisfied that there was a sufficient reason for not filing it earlier.

  1. The Appellate Tribunal may pass such orders, including temporary orders as it may deem fit after receiving an appeal under subsection (1) and after providing the parties with an opportunity to be heard.
  2. The Appellate Tribunal must submit a copy of every order it makes to the parties as well as the Authority or adjudicating officer.
  3. It shall deal with the appeal preferred under sub-section (1) expeditiously and dispose of the appeal within sixty days of the date of receipt of the appeal.

Provided that if any such appeal is not resolved within sixty days the Appellate Tribunal shall record its reasons in writing for not disposing of the appeal within that period.

Qualifications for appointment of the Chairperson and members (Section 46)

  1. No person shall be qualified to be appointed as a Chairperson or member unless he –
    1. Has been or is a Judge of High Court;
    2. In case if he is a judicial member, he has served in the judicial office within the territory of India for at least fifteen years or has been a member of Legal Services of India and has held the post of Additional Secretary of that service or any equivalent post, or has been an advocate having at least twenty-years experience with advocating real estate matters; and 
    3. In the case of a Technical or Administrative Member, he is a person who is well-versed in the areas of law, planning, commerce, accountancy, real estate, development, economics, infrastructure, public affairs, industry management or administration or a state government equivalent to the post of Additional Secretary to the Government of India or an equivalent post in the Central Government; 
  2. The appropriate government shall appoint the Chairman of the Tribunal after consulting with the Chief Justice of the High     Court or his nominee; 
  3. The Appropriate Government shall nominate the judicial members and technical or administrative members of the Appellate Tribunal on the suggestions and recommendations of the Selection Committee which consists of the Chief Justice of the High Court or his nominee, the secretary of the housing department and the secretary of law as prescribed.

Term of office of the Chairperson and members (Section 47)

The Chairperson of the Appellate Tribunal or a Member of the Appellate Tribunal shall serve for a term of not more than five years from the date of his appointment, but shall not be eligible for reappointment. Provided that if a person who is or has been a High Court Judge is appointed as Chairperson of the Tribunal, he shall not hold office after he has attained the age of 67 years: Furthermore, no Judicial member, technical member or administrative member shall hold office once he has reached the age of sixty-five. Before choosing anybody as Chairperson or Member, the competent government must ensure that the person does not have any criminal convictions or financial or other interests that may prejudicially affect his functions. 

Powers of the Appellate Tribunal (Section 53) 

The Tribunal is not bound by the Code of Civil Procedure of 1908 or the Indian Evidence Act of 1872, which impose strict procedures. It shall be guided by the principle of natural justice and also has the authority to regulate its own procedures. However, the Chairperson has administrative powers under the Act as he has been provided with powers of general superintendence and direction during the time of their conduct in the affairs of the tribunal and all the orders passed by the tribunal are to be executed as a decree of a Civil Court. The powers of the civil court are entrusted to the Tribunal which includes the following – 

  1. Summoning and enforcing the attendance of any person and examining him on oath;
  2. Requiring the discovery and production of documents;
  3. Receiving evidence on affidavit; 
  4. Issuing commissions for the examination of witnesses or documents;
  5. Reviewing its decisions;
  6. Dismissing an application for default or deciding it ex-parte, setting aside any order of dismissal of any application for default or any order passed by it ex-parte; and
  7. Any other matters as the Authority may specify by regulations.

Role of High Courts (Section 58)

All appeals from the Appellate Tribunal are heard by the High Court of the respective states. This must be done within sixty days from the date of decision or order on any of the grounds set out in Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. In such instances, there is no right of appeal if the decision has been reached with the parties’ consent. 

Power to make regulations (Section 85)

  1. The Authority shall, by notification, enact regulations consistent with this Act to carry out the purposes of this Act within three months of its establishment, by notification.
  2. Without prejudicing the generality of the foregoing power, such regulations may provide for all or any of the following:
    1. The form and manner of making an application and the fee payable therewith under Section 4(1);
    2. The form of application and the fees for extension of registration;
    3. Documents required under Section 11(1)(f) of the Act;
    4. Exhibition of layout plans and sanctioned plans along with specifications, approved by the competent authority under Section 11(3)(a) of the Act;
    5. Preparation and maintenance of other such details under Section 11(6);
    6. Time, places, and procedure for transaction of business in the meetings of the Authority under Section 29(1);
    7. The form and manner along with the fee payable for filing a complaint under Section 31(2) of the Act;
    8. Standard fee to be levied on the promoter, the allottees or the real estate agent under Section 34(e); and
    9. Such other matters which are required to be specified by regulation.

Penal provisions under RERA 

Promoters – 

Violation of the provisions of law A promoter shall be punishable with three years of imprisonment or a fine of ten per cent of the cost of the building. 
Non-registration of a project A promoter shall be punishable with a fine of ten per cent of the estimated cost of the building or the project.
False informationShall be punishable with a fine of 5 per cent of the cost of the building or the project.

Agents – 

Failure to comply with Authority’s directionsThe agents shall be punishable with a fine which may extend up to five per cent of the cost of the building and daily during which the offence continues. 
Failure to comply with the orders of the tribunalAn agent shall be punishable with imprisonment for a period of one year with or without a fine, which may extend to ten per cent of the cost of the building. 
Non – registration of the projectAn agent shall be punishable with a fine of Rs. 10,000 per day or five per cent of the total cost of the building.

Analysis of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016

Advantages of RERA for the buyers 

The customers are usually the ones who suffer the most if there is a problem, so the RERA was implemented having them in mind. The RERA Act has the following advantages:

  • Risk of delay is avoided: In recent years, builders have been known for delaying the completion of projects. If there is any delay, the RERA act stipulates that a penalty must be paid.
  • No excess charges: This Act contains all the information on the pricing per area. The RERA statute defines a built-up area, super built-up area and carpet area, making it impossible for builders to charge excessively. Payment for the super built-up area is forbidden. A customer will only be charged for the carpet area specified in the Act. 
  • Transparency: One of the most significant benefits provided to consumers is transparency. On the RERA website, the builders are expected to provide details about everything. This will assist customers in learning the finer points of the buildings and projects. 
  • Liability: Quality has always been a concern, particularly when it comes to a place where we must reside. If there is a quality issue, the consumer should notify the builder, who should address the issue within 30 days.
  • Quick redressal: Regulatory organisations and appellate tribunals will be established in each state under RERA to resolve builder-buyer issues. A person who has been aggrieved by any direction can expect a response from the appellate court within 120 days. If the buyer is not pleased with the decision of the Appellate Authority, he may further appeal to them. However, the appeal will only be heard after payment of
    1. Thirty per cent of the penalty, 
    2. or a higher percentage as decided by the Appellate Tribunal,
    3. or the whole sum due to the allottee, including interest and compensation, if any.

Advantages of RERA for builders

The following are the few advantages given to the builders:

  1. Adequate financial inflow: The start of a project is a big stumbling block for the property business. Financial changes such as the formation of the GST and as a result, the liberalisation of FDI have aided RERA in making business easier. Lenders are more prepared to provide income to builders now that the RERA Act has restored trust and openness. The transparency of monetary transactions has improved since demonetization. Many international and domestic investors are being encouraged to invest in Indian projects. As a result, there are more structured financial inflows, making property developments easier to implement.
  2. Increased competition: There are further chances of reviving the real estate market up to the mark which will surely interest home buyers to invest and buy property without any fear of fraud. Due to such progressive rules, it will most likely generate competition among the developers as the buyers will be interested in investing their money into the upcoming projects without much fear. 
  3. Better functioning: In the past, there were no suitable regulations or norms governing the real estate industry. There were also a lot of unresolved issues. The RERA act made it easier for the real estate industry to work efficiently and consistently.
  4. Imposition of penalty: If a customer does not pay his dues on time, the legislation contains a clause requiring the consumer to pay a penalty for the late payment.
  5. Transparency: Both the buyer and the seller benefit from transparency being the core aspect of the Act. Transparency also aids in the development of a positive relationship between the builder and the customers.

Disadvantages of RERA

As much as there are real benefits of enforcing RERA, there are also some disadvantages. The builders are the ones who have suffered the most, as a result of the RERA statute, and have had to shoulder a lot of costs. This Act has had a significant impact on business. The following are some of the drawbacks of RERA:

  1. The RERA rules and regulations do not apply to projects that were initiated before the adoption of RERA. 
  2. Compulsory registration may be a drawback because the government can take a long time to approve a plot. 
  3. There is also internal politics in this industry. Sometimes the government requests additional funds or requires them to bribe the government to obtain approval, resulting in financial difficulties.
  4. There are no specific requirements for buildings less than 5000 square metres. This will allow them to charge excessive fees resulting in a conflict. 
  5. A project may take longer to complete than expected. It is tedious to begin a new endeavour without completing the previous one as a builder cannot sell a building until it is completed and it becomes difficult for them to start a new project.
  6. It takes around two years for the promoter to acquire clearance, and thus the sector’s expansion will be hampered.
  7. There are no provisions for rentals in RERA.
  8. There is a cash flow problem due to the seventy per cent deposit of payment in the escrow account.
  9. The punishments are severe. In case of contravention of the provisions of this Act or failure to comply with the provisions of the Act, the punishment is either five per cent of the cost of the project. 

Impact of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 on the industry

The implementation of RERA has caused significant disruption in the business. The real estate business has contributed significantly to the country’s economy but this measure has harmed the industry and all builders are currently in financial distress as the Act has a direct impact on the prices of homes and home loan interest rates. The sector is beset by financial difficulties and has been hampered by numerous obstacles. The implementation of RERA has caused significant disruption in the business. The real estate business has contributed significantly to the country’s economy but this measure has harmed the industry and all builders are currently in financial distress. The sector is beset by financial difficulties and has been hampered by numerous obstacles. RERA has had a massive impact on the corporate world. The execution of demonetisation was already a problem but then the simultaneous enforcement of RERA produced a mass outrage. Property sectors of many states are becoming more transparent and credible as a result of existing regulations. Benefits are anticipated to accrue over time to all or any buyer. The scope and spirit of the Act can be upgraded by technologically enabled platforms that can handle greater data sets that are not yet recognised by many countries. The predicted advantages of the Act are likely to grow as a result of the increased focus on its implementation.

The economic impact of RERA on the industry

In India, three main policies were recently brought in by the Union Government. They were demonetisation, Goods and Services Tax and Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act which impacted the economy to a large extent. RERA was enforced after six months of demonetisation which detrimentally affected the real estate market and impeded its development. RERA affected the small-scale developers and contractors, especially in the metropolitan areas as many of their planned real estate projects were either abandoned or delayed until they were registered under RERA Act and as a result job prospects for the workers were scarce. There were also changes in liability and increased responsibility of the builders in terms of the delivery of the property. Furthermore, it led to a situation where sellers could not possibly sell the property at lower prices due to limited incentives and buyers were not willing to buy property due to their income hit by demonetisation or the reduced liquidity of the property. The real estate market was completely sluggish causing economic impacts and imbalance. 

Lacunas in the RERA Act

  1. The RERA Act categorically describes what is a carpet area but in terms of describing a net functional area, it did not include the area sold to the allottees for their individual use, such as the living room, bedroom, kitchen area and the lavatory, which should have been included. 
  2. Every potential project is to be registered under the Act under Section 3 of the Act. RERA also bars pre-launches in cases where authorisation is absent by the agency concerned. It is challenging when there are several phases in constriction of a real estate project and approval is required for each project. As there is no single-window clearance, the project’s progress will face hindrances and be delayed. Whereas Section 32 of the Act says that it is the duty of the Real Estate Authority to make a recommendation on the development of a single-window system to the appropriate government of the competent authority to check if the projects are completed in due time. 
  3. In many states, the implementation of the Act began only in May 2017 although the Act was effective from May 2016 and as of 2019 many states and union territories did not have the Real Estate Authority’s website launched. As per the status of RERA implementation in India, the National Capital Territory of Delhi, Assam, Manipur, Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh, Sikkim, Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh have not launched the Real Estate Authority’s Website. 
  4. As there are insufficient recovery powers with RERA, there is a big lacuna as there is a failure to comply with all the orders issued in favour of homebuyers by the RERA Authorities in the respective states 
  5. The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 does not mention that it is available only for registered projects. 
  6. The Act provides for certain categories of projects that are not required to be registered; these are within the scope of this Act. Although the projects mentioned in Section 3(2) have been pulled out of registration requirements, it has not been done so in the purview of other provisions of the Act. 
  7. The provisions for registration and obligations to be carried out at the time of the registration are applicable only for the registered projects and not all projects. 
  8. There is a lack of cash caused by a variety of extrinsic and intrinsic issues in the sector. Builders are forced to seek alternative sources of funding, resulting in a spike in home prices. This fluctuation has an impact on the demand and supply situation in this industry.
  9. Cash flow issues will arise as there is seventy per cent investment in the escrow account, causing project delays. This step is however taken to keep the developer’s mind from wandering to new projects and to finish the current project.
  10. If a builder fails to comply with any provisions of the Act, he is punished with up to three years imprisonment or a fine of ten per cent of the total cost of the project. This issue put the buyers at risk and forced them to leave their homes until the problem was resolved.
  11. RERA does not include any rental agreements, so it is entirely up to the buyer to save the rental agreement, which clearly states the agreed and disagreed portions, to save the property and make correct use of it.

Key challenges of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016

RERA, 2016 aim to create symmetry of information between the promoter and the buyer, transparency of contractual terms, basic accountability standards, and a fast-track dispute resolution process. However, the system’s stumbling blocks are outlined below:

  1. There is still a disparity in the timelines that states use to enact RERA Acts. Only 15 states have issued final guidelines, while others are still working on them.
  2. There is also a lot of misunderstanding among brokers and distributors about how to advertise projects to customers. Prohibitions on the development of builder microsites, restrictions on selling, KYC, and other issues are yet unclear.
  3. There is also some confusion regarding the re-execution of agreements in cases when the deed has already been signed. While some states demand that all such arrangements be re-executed under the RERA, others exempt existing agreements. This mismatch between states is causing a lot of misconceptions among property buyers.

Current issues in India in relation to the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016

The government intends to put tenanted or abandoned buildings, as well as their renters, under the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act of 2016, giving the consumers the same protection as other homebuyers for the first time. Many cities, particularly Mumbai, have tenanted or decommissioned buildings that contain people who have been living there for decades at low and artificially discounted costs. According to Magic Bricks, over seventy-four per cent of homebuyers in India are uninformed of the online process for checking the status of the project under the Real Estate Regulatory Act and also unclear about whether the projects are registered on a website or not. They majorly lack the relevant information such as carpet area, payment methods and the builder’s registration number. Many projects were supposed to register on websites and distribute fliers with the builders’ specific details.

Analysis of the establishment of the tribunals 

When it comes to the establishment of Appellate Tribunals and related tasks, there have been some aspects that require attention. The following are some of them:

  1. Real Estate Appellate Tribunals have not been formed in all Indian states and union territories. Appellate Tribunals have been formed in 22 states, with 13 permanent and 9 interim tribunals. The states must establish permanent authorities and Appellate Tribunals to better execute the Act and reduce the burden on the district courts.
  2. There was a petition raised in the Gujarat High Court to ensure that the tribunals are constituted as per the Act.  Because the Appellate Tribunal lacked technical members, it was called “Coram non-judice.” Technical members must be recruited since the real estate business necessitates specialised knowledge that judicial members may lack. Real estate is a vital national asset. The goal of the Act will be defeated if the Tribunal becomes bureaucratized. Other difficulties were noted as well, such as the Appellate Tribunal’s failure to give information on the number of appeals filed, pending appeals, and so on. To avoid further dilution of the RERA, it is necessary to guarantee that the institutions involved are given sufficient autonomy to function efficiently and that additional bureaucratisation is avoided. Important factors such as vacancies not being filled or appointments not being made impede institutions and contribute may defeat the objectives of the Act. 

Judicial insights

Geetanjali Aman Constructions v. Hrishikesh Ramesh Paranjpe

Issue – In this case, the issue was about project registration and the dispute was with regard to Section 3 of RERA. The most essential rule in this regard was Section 3(2), which stated specifically that projects are not necessary to be registered if their area does not exceed 500 square metres or if the building does not have more than eight storeys.

Arguments – Even after arguing that it is an “or” condition and not a “and” condition, the defendant failed to get the desired result. The argument put forward stated that the first condition that it must be within 500 sq meters. is satisfied, while the allottees have filed that since there are approximately 22 flats and 9 shops, it violates the second condition The question before the court was to interpret Section 3(2) and it held that Section 3(2) will be interpreted in its truest sense now and that the developer needs to satisfy both the conditions to get approval. 

Decision – Held that the developer has to register the project within one month and pay thirty lakhs. 

Mr. Jatin Mavani v. M/s. Rare Township Pvt. Ltd, 2018

Issue – The issue, in this case, is the filing of several RERA proceedings on the same subject matter. In this case, the complainant claimed that despite booking an apartment and paying the appropriate consideration, he was not provided with the flat on time and that other customers similarly sought redress from Maharashtra RERA, requesting the cancellation fee be waived and the sum already paid to be refunded. 

Arguments – The respondent builder argued that the first complainant never had the agreement registered and hence it could not be carried out. Even after the respondent asked him to enter into a new agreement, he refused and is now coming up with other buyers which would amount to a multiplicity of proceedings under the same authority, as he was a party to an earlier proceeding. 

Decision – The Maharashtra RERA took note of this and decided that the complainant had exhausted his remedy when he first sought the forum and that he now has no locus standi in approaching the court because, if he is regarded as an allottee, numerous proceedings before the same court would not be permitted.

Sushil Ansal v. Ashok Tripathi, Saurab Tripathi, 2020 

Facts – In this case, a decree was challenged in the NCLAT, which ordered the company to file for insolvency in order to pay a sum of rupees 73 lakh awarded by Uttar Pradesh RERA. The question was whether home buyers may be considered financial creditors. 

Decision – The forum determined that homebuyers can enforce their decree under civil law, but they cannot seek remedy from the IBC. According to the 2019 amendment, either 100 buyers or ten per cent of the allottee must file bankruptcy, but the fact that there are only 100 buyers can force the company to file bankruptcy by only two or three individuals. It is clarified that a home buyer is not to be seen on the same lines as a financial creditor when it comes to enforcing a decree for the repayment due to default on the part of the promoter itself.

Baldev Singh v. Ultratech Township Developers Pvt Limited, 2020

Issue – The question, in this case, was whether an allottee can demand a refund while withdrawing from a project which was nearing completion. The Authority in his opinion held that it not only protects the interest of the buyers but promotes orderly growth of the real estate industry through efficient project execution in the interest of the larger public. 

Decision – The Haryana RERA Panchkula’s view can be summed up as follows – 

“In case the relief of refund is granted to the complainant, interests of the rest of the non-complainant allottees could also get seriously jeopardised. Moreover, the flat of the respondent is complete and ready for possession and the complainant can take possession of the flat after clearing his pending dues.” 

Conclusion 

The Act is a great step forward in terms of boosting transparency in the real estate market, increasing promoter and developer accountability, and providing effective grievance resolution channels. As there are stringent rules and regulations in the highly corrupt sector, there will be less litigation. The establishment of laws like RERA is a big step forward in terms of raising awareness among customers, promoters, and builders. In the future, similar to RERA, the modernisation of land records, land acquisition, and GST could be prioritised for the real estate sector’s growth. The RERA is dedicated to the successful and effective implementation of the country’s real estate law, and it has adopted relevant and consistent steps to promote the sector’s development. Various policy measures adopted under the RERA would undoubtedly produce significant improvements in the economic and social transformation to stimulate the long-term development of RERA, as well as a customer-friendly environment.

References


Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/lawyerscommunity

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Is there an Indian equivalent for GDPR and what are the laws in India concerning personal data

0

This article is written by Rituja Tawade pursuing a Diploma in International Business Law. This article has been edited by Ojuswi (Associate Lawsikho) and Ruchika Mohapatra (Associate, Lawsikho).

This article has been published by Sneha Mahawar.

Introduction

Protection of personal data. What is the first thing that comes to our mind when we hear the above-mentioned sentence? We think of hacking, leaking, or misusing the personal data of an individual or any company or a country. Therefore, for the protection of all this data, many countries are enforcing laws and rules for their respective countries, such as GDPR enforced by the EU or PDPA in the process of enforcing laws in India, etc. Let us see what rules and regulation does GDPR comply and how other countries are coming up with rules and laws to enforce the security of their country’s data.  

What is GDPR

The General Data Protection Data (GDPR). It is the firm privacy and safe security law in the world. Drafted and enacted by the European Union (EU). Right to Privacy is part of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights, which states, “Everyone has the right to respect his private and family life, his home and his correspondence”. The regulation came into effect on May 25, 2018. GDPR stances on data privacy and security of the European citizens and residents. GDPR specifically enacted for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs). Even though GDPR have enacted for European citizens and residents, companies or organizations can apply it as long as their target customers or users related to the EU need to comply with the law, which has referred as the “extraterritorial effect” in Article 3 of GDPR. GDPR desires to acquire compliance for the businesses. In case of non-compliance, the firm must pay fines and penalties as per mentioned in Article 83 of GDPR.

There are two tiers of Infringement:

1. Less Severe Infringement.

2. More Severe Infringement.

  1. In Less Severe Infringement, either fine payable is up to 10 million euros or 2% of the worldwide annual revenue of the firm from the previous year or whichever is higher.
  1. More Severe Infringement deals with infringements that are more serious. These violate the Right to Privacy and the Right to be Forgotten. The fine payable by the organization is 20 million euros or 4% of the worldwide annual revenue of the organization from previous year or whichever is higher. 

Data protection principles

According to Article 5.1-2 of the Act, seven protection principles outlined below:

  1. Lawfulness, fairness, and transparency
  2. Purpose limitation
  3. Data minimization
  4. Accuracy
  5. Storage limitation
  6. Integrity and confidentiality 
  7. Accountability 

People’s privacy rights

GDPR recognizes new privacy rights for the data subject, which aim to give more control to an individual over the data.

Data subject’s privacy rights given below:

  1. Right to be informed
  2. Right to access
  3. Right to rectification
  4. Right to erasure
  5. Right to restrict processing
  6. Right to data portability 
  7. Right to object
  8. Rights about automated decision making and profiling

India’s undertaking on data protection

As mentioned above GDPR is only applicable to EU-related people and the companies and organizations that target people resident in the EU. 

We saw what is GDPR and its applicability and its functions. Now let us see laws applicable in India for the protection of the personal data of their citizens. 

The Information Technology Act, 2000, currently governs data protection in India. Reasonable security practices and procedures and sensitive data or Information Rules, 2011 (Data Protection Rules) comes under the IT Act. The Data Protection Rules impose certain obligations on the companies and the organizations that collect, process, store, and transfer sensitive personal data or information of an individual such as obtaining consent, publishing a privacy policy, disclosure, and transfer restrictions. 

The Data Protection Rules further provides the implementation of Reasonable Security Practices and Procedures (RSPPs) by organizations dealing with sensitive data or information of individuals.

As GDPR have enacted in the EU, all the other countries have been taking inspiration from the EU to develop the laws of their country. 

Now India is set to legislate a Personal Data Protection Bill (PDPB) or Act (PDPA), which would control the collection, processing, storage, usage, transfer, protection, and disclosure of personal data on Indian residents. PDPB is an important development for global managers.

India has followed the EU’s GDPR in allowing global digital companies to conduct business under certain conditions.

In 2017, the Supreme Court of India ruled that privacy is a constitutional right of Indian citizens. In the case of Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India. The matter referred to a Nine Judge Bench. The Bench comprised Chief Justice Khehar and Justices Jasti Chelameshwar, S.A. Bobde, D.Y. Chandrachud, Abdul Nazeer, R.K.Agarwal, Abhay Manohar Sapre, and Sanjay Kishan Kaul. On August 23, 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously recognized privacy as the fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution. Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) intends to provide security and protection of the personal data of an individual as well as the country’s security. 

PDPA proposes the concept of “data fiduciary” and “data processor”. Data fiduciary and Data processor are equivalent to the concept of controller and processor. 

As GDPR, PDPA will not only apply to Indian citizens and residents but also the people outside India about the business conducted in India, offering goods and services.

PDPA has categorized data into three types:

  1. Sensitive Data includes information on financials, health, sexual orientation, genetics, transgender status, caste, and religious belief. 
  2. Critical Data information includes that the government stipulates from time to time, such as military or national security data.
  3. General Data does not define but contains the remaining data.

Sensitive Data must be stored in servers located in India and, Sensitive Data must processed outside India but must brought back to India for storage.

Critical Data also must be stored in servers located in India and, Critical Data must not take out of India at all.

In addition, there are no such restrictions for General Data.

Organizations must carefully implement the appropriate measures to prevent unauthorized access to any sensitive or confidential data that might negatively affect the organization.

PDPA enforces steep penalties for non-compliance. In case of data breach or a minor violation, the penalties could reach 700,000 dollars or 2% of a company’s global revenues, whichever is higher. For major violations of data such as data shared without consent, the penalties would be double. For multinational companies that generate global income, the penalty is a potential jail sentence for the officers of digital companies.

PDPA would treat citizens’ data as a national asset, no different from control over citizens’ physical properties. In this respect, PDPA differs from GDPR, which imposes no locational storage requirements or preferential access to data for protecting national interests.

There is an urgent need for data protection in India. This bill is a good step towards data protection and provides broad principles of regulations and detailed laws.The impact of PDPA is good for emerging technologies and their application. For example, PDPA could potentially influence many fintech startups or companies as these companies rely on emerging technologies.  PDPA could potentially increase the growth of the Indian economy.

Justice Sri Krishna, who prepared the Draft Bill, believes that the exemption of government agencies is a clear dilution of the Bill. It means that the ultimate beneficiaries of the Bill, the data principals, will deprived of their rights granted by the Bill if the data processing done by the government agencies. Amidst all the data leakages caused by Aadhar, the Bill expected to cure many data-related problems. However, exemption of Central Government agencies can defeat many purposes intended by this much-needed legislation. 

Conclusion

Just like the EU enforced GDPR for all the European countries, all the other countries are also taking a step ahead for the data protection of their respective countries. GDPR enforces by the EU for the protection of the personal data of an individual and the small and medium organizations and the national security. The non-compliance enforced by the EU is also unbreakable so that no hacker or any invader can steal or fool around with the data. The PDPA draws a lot of inspiration from the GDPR. The GDPR does not exempt government agencies and has compulsory provisions to inform the data principals in cases of data breaches. 

Lastly, my opinion on this whole GDPR or PDPA is that it is a good step towards the security of their respective countries. Protecting the data of an individual is very important. These days we see anybody can steal or misuse the personal data of an individual or any important data of any company or government data that is important for national security and which can be very dangerous if this data comes in the hand of any enemy countries. Right to Privacy is the most important right given to the citizens of their countries and it must respect and must protect their country. All these respective countries have taken a very good step. 

References


Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/lawyerscommunity

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Consent, confidentiality and the Data Protection Act

0

This article has been written by Gairik Sanyal. It has been edited by Ojuswi (Associate, LawSikho).

It has been published by Rachit Garg.

Introduction

Developed countries of the west have come up with impressive data protection regimes in the wake of an unprecedented surge in public data collection by giant media owner corporations and states alike. Considered the strictest among them is the GDPR regime of the EU. 

The Government of India, feeling the need for a robust data protection code in India at the backdrop of high profile data leak events and the Supreme Court’s exhortation for such a law appointed a committee under the chairmanship of Retired Justice B.N. Srikrishna to draft a Personal Data Protection Bill that will “ensure the growth of the digital economy while keeping personal data of citizens secure and protected.” This Committee came up with the Personal Data Protection Bill of 2019. 

Subsequently, it was sent to a Joint Parliamentary Committee for improvement and fine-tuning. On the 16th of December 2021, the Joint Parliamentary Committee chaired by Mr P.P. Chaudary tabled its recommendations before both houses of the parliament. This article attempts to analyse and take a wholesome view of all aspects of data protection including a detailed dissection of the recommendations of the JPC and a comparison with western models of data protection regimes. Protection of data is the protection of privacy: pondering the need for data protection

The world is going through an unprecedented phase of internet activity thanks to social media giants like Google, Facebook, Twitter, Amazon etc. All of these media giants collect data from their users which could be classified as personal or sensitive. Eg. Facial profile, phone number, consumer preference patterns like what one likes to eat, wear etc. These are data  susceptible to breaches and misuse. In fact, such breaches are more common than an average user may imagine. India has ranked third in global data breach charts with over 88 million users falling prey to such misuse according to a Netherlands based VPN company, Surfshark. Important public companies like Air India and MacDonald India have reported serious data leaks in the year 2021. 

These leaked data could be put to a plethora of use. From an innocuous use like gauging consumer preference in an area of production to much more malicious use like phishing or banking fraud, data could be used for a whole spectrum of purposes. Most fundamentally, a data leak event compromises a user’s autonomy over his personal data and his right to give or withhold consent to sharing such information about himself as he wishes. The Supreme Court of India, in the watershed judgement of Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. The Union of India held that the right to privacy is a fundamental right under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Indian Constitution. This has created the space and necessity for a robust data protection regime more than ever before.

Western models of data protection regime compared: EU vs USA

The European Union and The United States of America have adopted diametrically opposite approaches to data protection. Indian Government’s stated policy objective is to utilise the best of both approaches to make the Indian code more effective in real world situations. The EU has adopted a citizens’ right-centric approach while the US has a protection of liberty (from state intrusion)  approach towards data protection. 

i.  The EU

Articles 7 and 8 of the European Union Charter give constitutional status to ‘Privacy’ and ‘Data Protection’ respectively. The first time the European Union tried to adopt a coherent policy on data protection was in 2014 when they adopted the ‘Data Protection’ directive. Being only a directive, it was not binding on any of the member countries of the EU. It acted only as a policy guide for similar levels of data protection across nationalities. This directive was heavily influenced by the OECD guidelines on the issue. In 2016, The EU parliament came up with the GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) and has given member countries two years to align their domestic laws with it. This was immediately binding on all the member states because it was in the nature of regulation. 

The EU model of data protection considers the idea of an individual’s right to control over his personal data as paramount and extends even beyond giving consent for the collection of such data. The EU GDPR gives an individual the right of control over his data not only to the extent of giving informed consent for its use but extends his right to rectify, change, object to a certain use, erasure etc. post collection of such data with valid consent. 

Furthermore, certain data like ethnic origin, political opinions, membership of trade unions, religious beliefs, sexual preferences etc are categorised as ‘sensitive data’. This type of data cannot be collected at all except under very limited exemptions like medical research. It applies to the state and private entities alike. It is for these reasons that the EU GDPR is considered the most stringent model of data protection laws available on the planet.

ii. The US

The US lacks an express constitutional commitment to individual privacy, unlike the European Union. However, the courts in the US have pieced together the first, fourth, fifth and fourteenth amendment to give the interpretation that the right to privacy is an inviolable right of every US citizen. The fourth amendment, which talks about ‘unreasonable searches and seizures,z is really the key building block of the edifice of this interpretation. 

Be that as it may, the US applies differential standards of data protection for government and private entities. Data processing by state agencies is regulated by overarching and sweeping legislation like the Privacy Act of 1974 and the Financial Privacy Act of 1978. These legislations are seen as the bulwark of individual privacy from government transgression. However, when it comes to the private sector, there is no such sweeping legislation; rather sector-specific legislation like The Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC) or Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act ( COPPA) take its place. The quintessential feature of these legislations seems to be a policy of ‘notice and consent’. 

The US government has put considerable efforts to gain compliance from websites in putting up their privacy policy and seeking consent from their users if their data is being collected. However, that is pretty much it. There has been no attempt at giving the data principal the right of withdrawing consent, deletion of previously given data or a say in its future processing, unlike the EU GDPR. Hence, the standards of consent required in the US are far lower than in the EU. The US laws in this area seem to be cautious of government intrusion into the private space of individuals yet liberal in granting leeway to the private sector to do the same thing. The US culture of Laissez Faire is writ large in its data protection policy.

EU GDPRUS Model
There is Constitutional protection for the right to privacy and data protection in Articles 7 and 8 of the EU Constitution. There is no constitutional guarantee for privacy. However, judicial interpretation has ensured that privacy is a cherished right.
Uses one omnibus law to protect data privacy for both public and private entities.Uses sector-specific legislation to protect user data in those specific sectors. Eg. FTC, COPPA 
Known for their stringent provisions and harsh penalties.Known to be lenient with private companies and very strict with state interventions.
Reflects an ideology of individual freedom being sacrosanct. The individual wields control over his data post giving consent as well. He retains the right of withdrawal of consent, deletion of data etc.Reflects the idea of ‘laissez faire’. The government is vigilantly kept out of the personal sphere of a private individual. Whereas, the corporates are asked to follow only a policy of ‘notice and consent’. The data owner retains no right post giving his consent for data processing.

Standard of Consent 

The standard of consent required in the EU is defined in Article 7 and specified under recital 32 of the GDPR. Consent must be free, specific, informed and unambiguous. 

  1. Free consent means that there must not be any undue pressure or influence bearing on the consent given. For example, in an employer-employee situation, the employee might fear retribution for declining consent. Here it will be incumbent on the data controller to raise the standard of consent by eliminating undue influence so that it could be considered free consent.
  2. Informed and specific consent implies that the data subject must be informed of who the data controller is, and what kind of functions he intends to put the data to use (to avoid function creep).
  3. Finally, the consent must also be unambiguous. It means that the consent must be an affirmative action by the data subject and not passive acquiescence. Consent cannot be presumed and must always be actively sought and given for it to be an unambiguous consent.

Existing laws on data protection in India

Currently, India lacks an omnibus law on data protection like the one in The European Union – GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation 2016). A Personal Data Protection Bill was tabled on the floor of the parliament in 2019. It was eventually sent for recommendation to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC). The JPC came up with its proposed recommendation, including changing the name of the bill to ‘Data Protection Bill’ instead of ‘Personal Data Protection Bill’ to make it more general and wide in its application, in  December 2021. 

However, this bill is yet to be passed by the parliament. In the absence of any such comprehensive data protection code, its role is being played by our good old Information Technology Act of 2000. S. 43A of the Information Technology Act reads as under: “Where a body corporate, possessing, dealing or handling any sensitive personal data or information in a computer resource which it owns, controls or operates, is negligent in implementing and maintaining reasonable security practices and procedures and thereby causes wrongful loss or wrongful gain to any person, such body corporate shall be liable to pay damages by way of compensation to the person so affected.” 

In 2011, the government also notified the ‘Reasonable Security Practices and Procedures and Sensitive Personal Data Information Rules’ commonly called the SPDI rules under this section of the IT Act. Hence, S.43A along with the SPDI Rules 2011 is the ad hoc arrangement regulating data protection in India until the arrival of the proposed Data Protection Act. 

Salient features of the Indian Data Protection Bill 2021

The Data Protection bill 2021 has increased the applicability of the bill from only ‘personal data’ to including  ‘non-personal data’ as well. Sensitive non-personal data includes all data that have gone through a process of anonymisation. Anonymisation can be defined as an irreversible process of conversion or transformation of data to a form in which the data principal cannot be identified (based on the laws of the irreversibility of the Data Protection Authority).

  1. A separate group of ‘sensitive personal data’ has been recognised in the bill. A higher  threshold of consent has been applied to this category of data. This category includes information on the health, sexuality, political beliefs, and financial activity of a person.
  2. The Data Protection bill will apply both to state agencies and private entities. It will even apply to companies who are offering goods and services to residents in India with offices located abroad.
  3. The bill also envisages a Data Protection Authority and a Data Protection Officer (S. 30) who will be saddled with the responsibility of monitoring and regulating the functioning of the ‘data fiduciaries’ under the act and also address grievances of the data principal.
  4. The Data Fiduciary will be obliged to inform the Data Principal regarding the likely nature of the use of his data, the rights of the Data Principal and also the process of grievance redressal.
  5. Social Media companies which are not mere intermediaries of information i.e., those which have the right to alter or remove content posted on their website (like Facebook and Twitter) may come under the definition of publishers under S.26 of the Data Protection Bill.
  6. S. 25 of the bill mandates a timeline of 72 hours for reporting any data breach by any data fiduciary. The 72 hours will be calculated from the time at which such a breach was noticed by the Data Fiduciary.

An attempt  at balancing the interests of the Data fiduciary as well as the Data Principal

The bill tries to tread the tightrope balancing the interests of both the Data Fiduciary as well as the Data Principal. On one hand, S. 25 sets a time limit of 72 hours for reporting any data breach thus warning companies against indefinite delays in reporting as seen in the past, on the other hand, clauses 13 and 14 allow  companies to process non-sensitive personal data of employees without consent where there is a “reasonable purpose” or if it is “necessary” or if it can be “reasonably expected” in the normal course of action.

Criticism of the bill 

Many of the committee members have written a dissent note mainly due to the insertion of S. 35  into the act. This section allows exemption to any government agency from the rigours of the act by an order by the Data Protection Authority. The fear is that government agencies like the UIDAI which collects public biometrics and other data can now use this section to evade accountability or even judicial scrutiny. To allay some of these fears, the bill has included the words “reasonable, just, fair and proportionate” as a qualifier to any such exemption order. This will keep it open for judicial interpretation on a case by case basis. Moreover, s 42 also provides for a robust Data Protection Authority with provisions meant to ensure its independence and impartiality. This too will act as an effective check against any arbitrary use of the exemption provision.

Conclusion

The Data Protection Bill of 2022 is a much-awaited legislation and a step in the right direction as well. The bill shows that we are clearly in favour of the umbrella law model of the EU. This entails its own advantages and disadvantages. While most developed countries like Singapore and Canada too have chosen the omnibus law model of the EU, it may not prove to be the best idea for India. Unlike these countries, India has an astounding litigation pendency rate. 

Such a law will only add to the already colossal case burden of our courts. Divergent interpretations of provisions in the statute by various High Courts could also discourage investors by making the business atmosphere hostile. On the flip side, we also cannot afford a sector-specific approach like the US because that would, in my opinion, require setting up tribunals which are expensive affairs in their own right. It might help create a nimble and professional business ecosystem but the SC has deprecated the practice of ‘tribunalising’ the justice system and hence might frown on it.  

Moreover, preferring a tribunal award for appeal would anyway drag it to the courts. On the balance, the approach taken by the committee seems prudent, reasonable and most importantly actionable. It incorporates helpful provisions from both approaches. One change, if a change is necessary, needs to be further qualification and truncation of the sweeping exemptions to government agencies that can be easily given under the law.

References 

  1. Justice K.S. Puttaswamy and (anr) v Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1
  2. State IT secretaries conf. Ministry of Information and Technology february 12 and 13 ‘18. P.8
  3. https://digitalindia.gov.in/writereaddata/files/6.Data%20Protection%20in%20India.pdf
  1. The white paper submitted by Justice Srikrishna committee also adopted a similar approach of synthesis of global models of data protection. (refer to the discussion in  P. 10-13 of the white paper) 
  2. https://www.meity.gov.in/writereaddata/files/white_paper_on_data_protection_in_india_171127_final_v2.pdf

Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/lawyerscommunity

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

All about Section 80 IPC

0
Section 120A

This article is written by Fahad AP from Markaz Law college. This article is a discussion on the concept of accident under general exceptions of IPC.

It has been published by Rachit Garg.

Introduction

The Indian Penal Code, 1860 offers some general defence which can give an accused person immunity from criminal responsibility which is based on a principle that though the person committed the offence, he cannot be held liable. This is because at the time of the commission of the offence, his actions were justified or there was no mens rea. However, he will not be held liable as per the defences provided under Chapter 4 of IPC.

Chapter 4 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 deals with General Defences. A crime arises only when mens rea is in clubbed with actus reus. It’s based on a well-known maxim “Actus Reus Non-Facit Reum Nisi Mensit Rea” which means the act is not culpable unless the mind is guilty. By means of these General Defences, an offence can be treated as non-offence for every offence is not absolute and they have certain exceptions.

General defences can be divided into two categories: 

  1. Excusable acts
  2. Justifiable acts

Excusable acts

new legal draft

Excusable acts are those that are exempted from the criminal liability for lack of mens rea, which is considered as a vital part in constituting a crime, from the accused person at the time of action. 

Excusable acts include:  

  1. Mistake of fact (S. 76 & 79) [Chirangi v. State 1952]
  2. Accident (Sec 80) [State v. Rangaswamy]
  3. Infancy (Sec82 & 83) [Umesh Chandra V State of Rajasthan]
  1. Insanity (Sec 84) [Ashiruddin Ahmed V The King]
  2. Intoxication (Sec .85 & 86) [ Suraj Jagannath Jadav V the State of Maharashtra]

 Illustration  

 A child of seven years of age just pressed the trigger of the gun and caused the death of the father, then the child will not be liable for this act for lack of guilty intention at the time of action. This is based on a maxim Doli Incapax which means incapable of understanding the nature of an offence. An act of a child below 7 years is absolute immunity. He will never be held liable for any of his actions.

Justifiable acts

When the accused’s actions are legally justified, the defences, mentioned under Part 4 of IPC, are given in those particular circumstances. Prima facie, these acts are deemed crimes under normal circumstances as it is mens rea at the time of action.

Justifiable acts include: 

  1. Judicial acts (Sec. 77 & 78) [Kapur Chand v the State of Himachal Pradesh]
  2. Necessity (Sec. 81) [R. V Dudley and Stephens]
  3. Consent (Sec. 87-92) [RP Danda v. Bhurelal]
  4. Communication (Sec. 93) [Dr. Deepa Sahai v. State of Bihar]
  5. Duress (Sec. 94) [State of  Karnataka v, M. Babu]
  6. Trifle acts (Sec. 95) [Prosecutor v. Satyanarayana] 
  7. Private defence  (Sec96 to 106] [Mohinder Pal Jollly v.State]

Illustration

 A surgeon, in good faith, communicates to the wife of the patient that the life of her husband is in danger. The wife dies as a consequence of the shock. The surgeon has committed no offence, though he knew it to be likely that the communication might cause the patient’s death

Burden of proof

The burden of proof means the duty upon a person who claims to prove a fact that goes in his favour and against his opponent. Under Section 101 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the burden of proof lies down with a person who claims. This Section says that whoever desires any court to give judgment as to any legal right or liability dependent on the existence of facts which he asserts, must prove that those facts exist. When a person is bound to prove the existence of any fact, it is said that the burden of proof lies upon that person. For instance, In criminal cases, it is the duty on the prosecution to bring the burden of proof against the accused, likewise in a civil cases, the burden of proof lies upon the Plaintiff.

On the other hand, under Section 105 of Indian Evidence Act 1873, where the accused claims in order for him to get benefits of any general exceptions of Chapter 4 of IPC, the burden of proof is upon him. It is their duty on him to prove that his case falls within the exception provided under these general exceptions.

 In the case of K.M Nanavati v. the State of Maharashtra (1961), the Court upheld that the burden of proof, with a view to availing defences, mentioned under Chapter 4 of IPC , lies upon the accused.

Accident under Section 80 IPC

 The word accident means a sudden unintended and misfortune act by chance without any apparent cause. It is considered as one of the general defence under criminal law for lack of mens rea, as a vital part in committing a crime, at the time of action. Mere an act without a guilty mind doesn’t constitute a crime.

This section says that “Nothing is an offence which is done by accident or misfortune, and without any criminal intention or knowledge in the doing of a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution.”

 Illustration

‘A’ is at work with a hatchet; the head flies off and kills a man who is standing by. Here, if there was no want of proper caution on the part of A, his act is excusable and not an offence.

How accident comes under Chapter 4 of IPC

Section 80 of IPC treats accidents as general defences which makes him immunity from the criminal liability as well as the punishments. According to the law, it doesn’t intend to punish anyone for things over which he could possibly have no control. A mere action doesn’t constitute a crime unless it is clubbed with a guilty mind at the time of action.

An accident falls under excusable defence which is treated as a general defence of IPC, as there is no criminal intention while occurring accident. As it is widely proved that intention is a vital part of constituting a crime.

The word ‘intention’ is nowhere defined in IPC. But words like voluntarily, deliberately, willfully and etc, are used to get the approximate meaning of word intention.

There are four elements of crime namely: Person, Mens Rea, Actus Reus and Injury. According to mens rea, it’s the most important element to be proved that a crime has been committed. It means that it was the intention of the accused to purposely / willingly and along with proper pre planning to cause harm to a person or property.

It is derived from a well-known maxim Actus Reus Non-Facit Reum Nisi Mens Sit Rea which means an act doesn’t render a man guilty of a crime unless his mind is guilty.

Essential elements of Section 80 IPC

1. Act should be done by accident.

2. Act should be without any criminal intention or knowledge.

3. While doing a lawful act in a lawful manner by lawful means.

4. With proper care & caution.

Accident in doing a lawful act

Actually, it is based on a principle that no act is an offence unless the one doing it has done it with criminal intention.

Section 80 sheds light on the fact that nothing is an offence which is done by accident or misfortune and without any criminal intention or knowledge, in the doing of a lawful act act in a lawful manner by lawful means and with proper care and caution. 

Illustration  

‘A’ is at work with a hatchet; the head flies off and kills a man standing nearby. Here, if proper precautions were not taken on behalf of A, then his work shall be excusable as per mentioned in the general defence of IPC and not an of offence.

Important case laws related to the accident

State of Government v. Rangaswamy  [1952]

This case is based on the principle that an act done by an accident, will come under Section 80 of Indian Penal Code.

In this case, the accused went with a view to killing Hyena and heard a sound from a direction and fired a shot at it’s direction. But later it was convinced that it was a person, not Hyena. Then he pleaded that it was raining and had a bona fide impression that it was Hyena and fired the shot with a view to protecting people around him from being attacked by it.

The Court upheld that the accused will be entitled to the benefits mentioned under Section 80 of Indian Penal Code as besides other facts, there was no expectation of any other person being present in that area in which the death happened. so it is proved that the act was the result of an accident.

Tunda v. State [1950]

This case is based on a principle that when an act is done without criminal intention or knowledge, it will come under Section 80.

In this case, the accused Tunda and the deceased were friends who were very interested in wrestling and were engaged in a wrestling bout. While wrestling, the deceased got injured on his head and it resulted in his death. In this case, Allahabad Highcourt observed that the injury caused by death was the result of an accident and there was no foul play on part of the accused. In addition to that, the court held that there was an implied consent of the deceased in taking any risk in the wake of wrestling. Therefore the accused was entitled to get benefits under both Section 80 and 87.

Jageshwar v. Emperor [1924]

This case is based on a principle that when an act is not lawful in a lawful manner by lawful means, it will not come under Section 80 of the Indian Penal Code. In this case, the accused was hitting the victim and accidentally hit the wife of the accused who was pregnant. No sooner did the blow hit the head of the child than it resulted in his death. The Court held that the accused will not be entitled to the benefits of Section 80 of IPC. It’s because even though the death of the child was by accident, the act was not lawful in a lawful manner by lawful means.

Bupendra Sinha Choudasama v. State of Gujarat

This case is based on a principle that when an act was done deliberately and without proper care and caution, it will not come under Section 80 of IPC.

In this case, the appellant Bhupendra Sinha, an armed constable of special reserved police fired the shot at his superior head constable and it resulted in his death forthwith. Actually, both were Posted in the same platoon at Khumpla Dam. Then the accused pleaded that he was doing his patrolling duty.

But the supreme court observed that the act done by the accused reflects utter lack of proper care and caution and hence he can’t claim any benefits under Section 80 of IPC.

Conclusion

The criminal law deals with the different punishments for various crimes mentioned in the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Though the person commits an offence, he may not be held liable for an offence he committed.It is because every offence is not absolute, they have certain exceptions. These exceptions are provided under Chapter 4 of IPC. Through this chapter, the law bestows certain defences which escape the accused from criminal liability and its punishments. These defences are based on the principle that though a person commits an offence, he will not be held liable. It is because there will not be the guilty intention at the commission of act. According to accident, mentioned under Section 80 of the Indian Penal Code, it is considered an excusable act which escapes one from the responsibility of crime for the acts devoid of mens rea, at the end of action, are exempted from criminal liability. 

References

  • Indian Penal Code By C.K.Takwani
  • Indian Penal Code By NV Paranjape
  • Lectures on Criminal Law By Dr. Rega Surya Rao
  • AIR 1950 All 95
  • AIR 1929 All 932

Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/lawyerscommunity

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Non-Solicitation Agreement

0

This article is written by Amulya Bhatia, currently pursuing B.B.A. LL.B from Symbiosis Law School, NOIDA. This article is an overview of a Non-Solicitation Agreement and also explains the extent to which such an agreement is legally valid within India as well as internationally. Moreover, the article also discusses the evolution of legal validity of a Non-Solicitation Agreement with the help of judicial pronouncements in India.

Introduction 

A business or company may be able to predict the potential profit or loss in a particular year, or even the resources needed, but it cannot predict human behaviour. No business can forecast whether the employees will get along and it is no surprise that employee conflicts have the potential to hamper the growth of the business. While forecasting employee behaviour may not be an option, controlling such behaviour is still a possibility. This can be done by way of employee contracts.  

An employee contract is a contract between an employee and employer that safeguards the interest of all parties involved. Such a contract binds the two parties in terms of their roles and duties and remuneration for the same. With rising competition in the world, businesses are doing everything in their power to protect their needs. Therefore, such employee contracts contain certain clauses that restrict employee behaviour during and post the employment period, with the sole intention of not hampering the growth of the business. A non-solicitation agreement is one such clause that is in favour of the employer and has therefore been widely discussed to understand how valid it is. 

This article discusses the definition as well as deciphers the scope of a non-solicitation agreement and its practical application in the world in detail.

Non-Solicitation Agreement : an overview 

The word ‘solicit’ in a general legal sense means contacting customers with the purpose of getting involved in business with them. The stakeholders in any business are the employees and the customers. Acquiring a good customer base requires a lot of effort, and losing even a single customer is as good as losing something extremely valuable for a company. This is where a non-solicitation agreement comes into play.

new legal draft

Definition

A non-solicitation agreement is an agreement between a company and its employees. It is basically a clause in a contract according to which if an employee stops working at the company or starts working for, let’s say a competitor, such a contract refrains the employee from soliciting or poaching any business clients or using any confidential information that was obtained by virtue of working at the respective company. In layman’s language, such a clause abstains the employee from using contacts made during his employment for his personal advantage. More specifically, the scope of such an agreement is only extending to refraining an ex-employee from acquiring the customers they worked with during the course of their employment. The validity of a non-solicitation agreement was upheld by the Delhi High Court in the case Wipro Ltd v. Beckman International (2006).  

Examples of a Non-Solicitation Agreement

A non-solicitation agreement may also include within it certain restrictions. One such example would be if, under circumstances where an employee chooses to leave the company, the employee cannot attempt to take other employees along by luring them through a new job opportunity.

Let’s understand such an agreement with an example. Imagine that you are posted at a high-ranking position as a salesperson in ABC Ltd., a company that sells mobile phones. You have been working here for 10 years and have therefore built a lot of contacts and know the suppliers to source the necessary resources from for optimum results. Another company that sells mobile phones, say, XYZ Ltd., offers you a job with a higher salary and you accept it. Now, if the employment contract you signed for your first job contains a non-solicitation agreement, you cannot use the built contacts and ask the suppliers to switch companies because you work at a new company now. This would also apply to cases where one was to start their own business. 

How is a Non-Solicitation Agreement imposed 

As is clear from the definition, a non-solicitation agreement is used by employers where the employees interact with customers on a daily personal basis. For example, a salesperson of a company would have a personal connection with customers, or a hairstylist working at a parlour would have made a lot of contacts during the course of their employment. Now, how exactly can a company prevent an employee from poaching their clients, or even stealing the existing employees? A non-solicitation agreement exists for this purpose. Let’s say a woman working in a beauty parlour named ‘LOOKS’ decides to open her own parlour, and asks her friends and previous customers to join her in her new venture. This would amount to a solicitation. 

Now how exactly does a non-solicitation agreement work? Such agreements are usually a part of larger contracts such as non-disclosure agreements, employee contracts, or even non-compete agreements. However, in rare cases, they may even exist as unique contracts. Such a contract is known as a restrictive covenant. How enforceable restrictive covenants are in reference to Indian law has attracted divergent views on the matter, and therefore, has been largely discussed further. 

Sample of a Non-Solicitation Agreement

An employee contract contains various clauses dealing with terms of confidentiality, payment methods, and timings, resignation process, promotion, bonus, etc. A non-solicitation agreement is generally a clause in an employment contract.  The following is a sample of a non-solicitation clause in an employee contract:

“Non-Solicitation. The Executive agrees that, during his employment and for the Restricted Period, the Executive shall not, directly or indirectly, other than in connection with the proper performance of his duties in his capacity as an executive of the Company, 

(a) interfere with or attempt to interfere with any relationship between the Company Group and any of its employees, consultants, independent contractors, agents or representatives, 

(b) employ, hire or otherwise engage, or attempt to employ, hire or otherwise engage, any current or former employee, consultant, independent contractor, agent or representative of the Company Group in a business competitive with the Company Group, 

(c) solicit the business or accounts of the Company Group or 

(d) divert or attempt to direct from the Company Group any business or interfere with any relationship between the Company Group and any of its clients, suppliers, customers or other business relations.  

As used herein, the term “indirectly” shall include, without limitation, the Executive’s permitting the use of the Executive’s name by any competitor of any member of the Company Group to induce or interfere with any employee or business relationship of any member of the Company Group.”

Important terms in a Non-Solicitation Agreement

For the non-solicitation agreement entered into to serve the purpose for which it is signed, it needs to incorporate all the necessary terms and provisions to make such an agreement completely intact. Skipping even a single important provision or document can create scope for legal rights to be violated. Moreover, it is also important for all the parties involved to fully understand the contract they are signing which is only possible once they familiarize themselves with the key terms in such an agreement.

The terms of your contract need to be specific to your industry and geographical area. All parties to the contract must be aware of the legal implications of the contract. The following are a few of the terms that are important to a non-solicitation agreement.

  1. Contract introduction: A contract introduction would have the names, addresses, and other necessary details of the parties involved, along with the date of signing of the agreement. 
  2. Term/non-solicitation period: Since a non-solicitation agreement lasts only for a specific period, the term basically refers to the duration for which the agreement is applicable. There is no definitive limit on the term; it could be for months or years, but it will have an end. Longer terms are usually looked at as suspicious by Indian Courts as they appear to be less reasonable. 
  3. Definitions: It is important to define the legal jargon used in a contract to make the contract easier to understand.  
  4. Exclusions: The contract should clearly include all exclusions, and mention the behaviour that is restricted. Moreover, the required guidelines on the scope of the non-solicitation agreement need to be outlined within such an agreement.
  5. Covered employees: Now it is known that non-solicitation agreements are only considered by courts in India if they seem reasonable. Most businesses have many employees working for them, but not every employee is valuable to the company. Therefore, a company should only protect those employees who are essential to the running of a business via a non-solicitation agreement. By understanding the judicial trend regarding non-solicitation agreements in India, it has been observed that if such an agreement moves to court, the company must be able to prove that losing the employees who are being poached would be detrimental to their business, or even make it impossible to run the business. These could include employees who hold confidential information, or ones who have a personal relationship with customers. Those employees who are protected from being poached by an ex-employee are called covered employees, and this is one of the most important terms in this agreement. 
  6. Severability: It is necessary to make sure that the non-solicitation agreement does not fall flat simply because any other provision of the contract becomes unenforceable.
  7. Transition provisions: There are certain contractual relationships whereby a company hires an agency temporarily for the purpose of completing a specific task. Basically, contractors who work with companies under a service agreement might work with their competitors once the work with the company is done. Therefore, under these circumstances, details regarding the transition period, i.e. time period between ending a contract and working as per a new one. Keeping in mind the porosity of time, such terms are critical to be included in a non-solicitation agreement. 

Difference between a Non-Solicitation Agreement and a Non-Compete Agreement 

Now we know that companies, where the entire business is dependent upon customer loyalty, use legal means to prevent employees from ‘stealing’ their clients. However, inserting the non-solicitation agreement in employee contracts is not the only way to do so. Non-compete clauses more or less perform the same function. Thereby, despite being completely different definitions, these two clauses are often confused with each other in the legal world.

A non-compete agreement is more restrictive in nature, in comparison to a non-solicitation agreement. The former focuses on refraining the employee from competing with the company the employee is leaving altogether, while the latter only prevents the employee from working with previous clients of the company.

A non-compete agreement bars any employee from entering the same field as the employer, and as a result competing with the employee. Such agreements are limited through time and scope. This means that a non-compete clause would restrict an employee from working in the same field as the employer or working with any competitors of the employer for a specific time period and a specific geographical area. To understand this with an example, Apple hired Saloni as sales manager of the laptop department. As a result, by inserting the non-compete agreement in Saloni’s employee contract, Apple can prohibit her from working with Samsung, Dell, HP, Lenovo, or any other company selling laptops as they are its direct competitors, during and after the course of her employment, in a reasonable manner. 

The following is a sample of a non-compete clause in an employee contract:

“Covenant Not to Compete.  You agree that at no time during the term of your employment with the Company will you engage in any business activity which is competitive with the Company nor work for any company which competes with the Company.  

For a period of one (1) year immediately following the termination of your employment, You will not, for yourself or on behalf of any other person or business enterprise, engage in any business activity which competes with the Company within ______ miles of the facility in which you were employed.”

It has been argued that a non-solicitation agreement is preferable to a non-compete agreement due to the latter’s restraint on an employee’s ability to work and earn a living. However, it is pertinent to note that the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Niranjan Shankar Golikari v. Century Spinning & Manufacturing Co. Ltd.(1967) observed that a non-compete agreement would be valid as long as it is reasonable in terms of its scope.  

Therefore, the main difference between these two types of agreements is their scope, even though the main aim is to protect the interest of the employer under circumstances where an employee is leaving the company. 

Legal interpretation 

In order to fully understand a non-solicitation agreement, it is important to know how this agreement has been inferred by the statutes and the court of law. Furthermore, it is pertinent to know the legal issues that circle a non-solicitation agreement. 

Enforceability of a Non-Solicitation Agreement in India 

It is to be noted that both, non-solicitation agreements, as well as non-compete agreements, tend to consider the best interest of the employees. However, it is important to understand the extent to which such agreements are legally enforceable. The position of Indian courts in this context is said to be very restrictive in order for such agreements to be deemed valid. Under Indian law, The Indian Contract Act, 1872, hereby referred to as “Act” is the Indian legislation that governs the legal position in agreements whereby there is a restraint on trade, and thus it covers non-solicitation and non-compete agreements. Section 27 of the Act reads as follows:

“Every agreement by which anyone is restrained from exercising a lawful profession, trade or business of any kind, is to that extent void.”
Section 27 is very clear regarding its stance on agreements that restrict trade and vehemently bars such agreements in express terms. This would make non-solicitation agreements void, but then why is it that such agreements are still a prevalent practice?

The courts in India by understanding the need for a non-solicitation agreement have laid out certain exceptions to this rule. This does not mean that partial or absolute restraint on trade is no longer void. However, under certain circumstances, the court has allowed the inclusion of a non-solicitation agreement in employment clauses.

For the longest time, the judicial trends in India were demonstrative of the fact that courts allow for these agreements to be valid during the court of the partnership/employment, meaning that the Courts leaned towards a more restrictive approach. However, gradually, the courts are becoming more flexible where there has been a lot of discussion about the validity of such agreements post-termination of the employee, even though such flexibility is far from what would serve to be beneficial for the employer. To conclude, the legal enforceability of clauses that impose a restraint on trade, such as non-solicitation and non-compete agreements, differs on a case-to-case basis depending upon the facts and circumstances of each case. 

Judicial Pronouncements 

The Indian courts have delved into the legal enforceability and ambit of a non-solicitation agreement and other restrictive covenants through a plethora of judgments. 

One of the first few cases to discuss the legal validity of a non-solicitation agreement was Wipro Ltd v. Beckman International (2006). In this case, the Delhi High Court observed that a non-solicitation clause is not void per se. Furthermore, it was observed that a non-solicitation clause is reasonable and thus would not be violative of Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act. The Court further focused on the relationship between parties having such an agreement where it was said that a stricter approach is applied in employer-employee contracts. The Court, therefore, highlighted the following features in this judgment:

  1. Negative as well as positive covenants that are applied during the course of employment cannot be inferred as restrictive of trade, if reasonable. 
  2. Such agreements are not applicable post-termination of the employee contract.
  3. The Courts shall take a more stringent approach when dealing with employee-employer contracts than in other contracts, such as partnerships. This is because it is believed that in employer-employee relations, one is in a dominant position. However, in the latter, the parties are still expected to be on an equal footing.

 Therefore, the Court viewed this case liberally and no injunction was granted in favour of the petitioner. 

Another important judgment that deciphered the legal validity of restrictive covenants is American Express Bank Ltd. v. Priya Puri (2006). In this case, the American Express Bank requested the Delhi High Court to grant an injunction to limit an ex-worker from (1) revealing any information, and (2) revealing information to poach clients of the Bank. Now, it was held by the Court that revealing important information cannot be used as a ground to restrict one’s ability to work. 

In another case, Niranjan Shankar Golikari v. The Century Spinning And Mfg. Co. (1967), the Hon’ble Supreme Court made a clear demarcation in the applicability of restrictive covenants such as non-compete and non-solicitation agreements during employment as well as post the course of employment and further stated that both these situations would be dealt with differently. It was through this case it was concluded that negative covenants would only be legally enforceable when they are operative during employment, and as a result not remain ultra vires to Section 27 of the Indian Contracts Act. The case listed down the test to determine whether a restrive agreement is valid under Section 27. 

The above Supreme Court case was used as precedent by the Delhi High Court in LE Passage to India Tours & Travels Pvt. Ltd v. Deepak Bhatnagar(2013). It is observed that while there is a complete ban on any agreement that restrains trade, there is an exception when the limits applied to such agreements are declared reasonable by the Court.

A similar approach was followed by the Supreme Court in Percept D’Mark (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Zaheer Khan & Anr (2006), but the court discussed the possibility of an exception regarding the applicability of restrictive covenants post-termination of the employee contract. The Court observed that if a restrictive covenant is reasonable in terms of its scope, i.e. time and geographical area, it would not be void as per Section 27 of the Act. The Supreme Court also held that “the doctrine of restraint of trade does not apply during the continuance of the contract of employment and it applies only when the contract comes to end.”

The Madras High Court in FL Smidth Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s. Secan Invescast (India) Pvt.Ltd (1967) also known as the ‘Secan Invescast judgement’ held that approaching customers from previous employment shall not amount to solicitation until and unless such customers have placed orders or enters into business with the ex-employee based on such approach. Furthermore, it was held that such agreements will be enforceable only if they are reasonable in terms of distance, time limit, etc.

International perspective

Every country’s legal system is to an extent a reflection of the values that prevail in a society. Naturally, the laws of every country and their judicial set-up differ. However, as far as the legal validity of non-solicitation agreements is concerned, most countries have one basic principle that needs to be followed for such agreements to be valid, and that is ‘reasonability’

Recently, in Canada, the Alberta Court of Queen’s in a landmark judgment, Specialized Property Evaluation Control Services Ltd. v. Les Evaluations Marc Bourret Appraisals Inc., 2016, deciphers the legal validity of restrictive covenants, mainly non-competition and non-solicitation clauses. In this case, an injunction was called for by Specialized Property Evaluation Control Services Ltd. (“SPECS”) against Ross Huartt, a former employee at SPECS, along with the place Ross was currently working at, Les Evaluations Marc Bourret Appraisals Inc. SPECS requested for the injunction in order to prohibit Ross from soliciting any clients of SPECS for a period of 6 months.

The Court placed emphasis on the presence of reasonableness while implementing a restrictive covenant. A test was established wherein certain questions were laid down in order to determine the legal validity of a restrictive covenant. The same is mentioned below:

“ 1. Does the employer have a proprietary interest entitled to protection?

  2. Are the temporal and geographic elements of the agreement too broad?

  3. Is the covenant unenforceable as being against competition generally, and not limited to proscribing solicitation of clients of the former employee?       “

The question that arises here is, what exactly determines the reasonability. The following are certain basic factors or principles that are taken into consideration in most countries internationally such as Canada, the UK, and Australia while determining whether a non-solicitation agreement is valid or not:

  1. Duration: The duration of a restrictive covenant is an important factor to consider before determining its enforceability. A very long period is often looked down upon. 
  2. Protect the employer: If such an agreement is considered absolutely necessary to protect the employer as well as the growth of the business, the agreement is deemed to be reasonable. 
  3. Geographic scope: The area till which the restrictive covenant is established is also assessed to determine the reasonability of the agreement.
  4. Public policy: The restrictive covenant must not violate public policy.
  5. Impact on an employee: The restrictive covenant must not be exceptionally hard on the employee, as a result violating his right to trade. 

Misuse of a Non-Solicitation Agreement

Proper implementation of laws is a prerequisite to maintaining order within a society. However, India has witnessed the grave and rising issue of misuse of the law. The same is the case with a non-solicitation agreement. Such an agreement is still being delved upon by Indian courts which increases the scope of it being misused for the advantage of one of the parties. Therefore, in order to make sure that a non-solicitation agreement has legal standing if the court is approached, the following are some points that must be kept in mind while drafting a non-solicitation agreement:

  1. Scope: Now it is understood that a non-solicitation agreement can only be wide enough for it to cover the possible ways that can be used by a current or former employee to hamper the growth of the business. If for example an ex-employee of a mobile manufacturing company starts to work for a coffee shop and approaches former clients, the contract must specifically mention if a situation like this would also qualify as solicitation since the two companies are not competing.
  2. Length and ambiguity: It is important for a non-solicitation agreement to be short, crisp, and clear for a better understanding of all parties involved. It must contain all the necessary details, but lengthy sentences and the use of complicated legal language may create a way for there to be loopholes in the clause. 
  3. Generalization: A one-size-fits-all agreement is not the way to go when it comes to a non-solicitation agreement. It may be easy to make but isn’t right for every job. For example, a non-solicitation clause for an employee who is more valuable to the company will be tighter and stricter.
  4. Reasonability: The stand of the Indian court may not be clear in terms of the validity of a non-solicitation agreement yet, however, their stand on the manner in which this agreement must be framed is clear. It is established that a non-solicitation agreement must be reasonable and must take into consideration the different facts and circumstances of each case.
  5. Poor wording: Using proper and simple wording is a prerequisite to any contract, especially one where the scope is still not certain. Now, solicitation can mean different things and include many things. It can include stealing clients, inducing employees to leave the company, or even using confidential information for their own advantage. The most important part to make a non-solicitation clause tight-knit, defining what you mean by solicitation is a must. For example, imagine if an employee contacts a former employee. Would that also amount to solicitation? Such aspects need to be considered while framing the clause. 

FAQs regarding a Non-Solicitation Agreement

  1. Why is a Non-Solicitation Agreement important?

A non-solicitation agreement is used to prevent an ex-employee from poaching clients or using the contacts that he made during the course of his employment. Furthermore, this only applies to those customers whom the ex-employee worked with.

  1. What is a Non-Solicitation period?

A non-solicitation agreement is only considered legally valid when the time period for which it is enforced is reasonable. A non-solicitation period refers to the number of months for which the agreement is imposed. 

  1. When are Non-Solicitation Agreements used?

Such agreements are usually a part of employee contracts so as to prevent an employee after termination of his employment from poaching the customers he worked with during employment.

  1. What makes a Non-Solicitation Agreement legally valid?

In the majority of countries, a non-solicitation agreement is considered to be legally valid when such an agreement is reasonable in terms of its scope, duration, geographical area, etc. 

Conclusion 

With growing times, the complexities around ‘white collar’ workers have grown and there have been several situations that require legal assistance. Whether it is the breach of fiduciary responsibilities, terms regarding the course of employment, or even non-compliance with company guidelines, such cases can only be dealt with legally, However, the legal framework in India is still at a very nascent stage and needs to be discussed in depth.  

Even though as mentioned above, Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act clearly imposes a ban on any agreement which restrains one’s ability to trade. However, this law has been evolved by the Indian courts and it is concluded that such non-solicitation agreements would in fact be valid during the course of employment only. However, it is to be noted that post-termination validity is also being considered. This shows how the Indian courts are perceiving this matter and keeping in mind the best interest of all parties involved. 

Restrictive covenants in India have become more relevant now than before due to the rise in competition in society, and also due to the increasing employer-employee and other corporate disputes. This is also why the courts are now considering the scope of such agreements. It can be concluded that negative or positive covenants need to be analyzed on a case-to-case basis and cannot be looked at through a straightjacket lens because of their controversial nature. Application of principles is important, but such issues can only be judged on the basis of the question of fact, and that can only be examined by the court of law on the basis of facts and circumstances of each case.

References

  1. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=09e8927d-4580-4fe2-87e9-8088e8dadb20
  2. https://www.burkelaw.com/pressroom-news-Non-compete-vs-Non-solicitation-Every-Business-Person-Should-Know-the-Difference.html
  3. https://www.lawinsider.com/contracts/fNjYBn29sv7#non-solicitation
  4. https://www.upcounsel.com/non-solicitation
  5. https://www.nishithdesai.com/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Research%20Papers/Employment_Contracts_in_India.pdf

Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/lawyerscommunity

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Section 24 of Income Tax Act, 1961

0

This article has been written by Nikunj Arora, a student of Amity Law School, Noida. This article provides a detailed overview of Section 24 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, along with the applicable and related judgments. This article also gives an introduction to ‘income from house property’ along with the deductions made under Section 24 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

This article has been published by Sneha Mahawar.

Introduction

Many of us dream of building our own house. But unfortunately, the property prices are so high that few people can afford to own a home without having to take out a loan. There are several banks and financial institutions that offer home loans to their clients at easy EMIs. Moreover, the Indian Government too gives plenty of incentives regarding this. In particular, the government provides tax deductions on income from home property. These deductions are discussed in Section 24 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (ITA/Act).

The income from a property consisting of buildings or land attached to them falls under the heading of ‘house property’. According to this heading, house properties fall into three categories, i.e., let-out house property, self-occupied house property, and deemed let-out house property.

In calculating the income from a house, its annual value is taken into account. In determining annual value, several factors, such as municipal valuation, fair rent, standard rent, and actual rent, must be considered. The value of a property is calculated on a notional basis, even if it is not really rented during the year, and hence taxed accordingly. For properties that are self-occupied or cannot be occupied by the owner because of his employment, business or profession at another location, the value of one or two such properties is defined as “nil”.

This article, therefore, revolves around Section 24 of ITA and the deductions under it.

Income from house property in India

‘Income from house property’ means any income derived from house property, whether it be in the form of rental income or upon its transfer. Thus, houses, buildings, offices, and warehouses are all considered to be ‘house property’ under the ITA. A house property income is one of five sources of gross total income (GTI) that is included in the computation of the assessee’s GTI for the year. Several deductions must be taken into account before the income from house property is taxable.

The following three conditions must be met in order for the income to be taxed under Income from House Property:

  • In order to be considered a house, its property must be a building, land, or an apartment,
  • The property owner should be the assessee, and
  • Furthermore, the property should not be used for business purposes.

A property can be self-occupied, let out, or inherited. Under income tax rules, the income taxable under the heading ‘Income from House Property’ is calculated in a specific manner for both self-occupied properties and let-out properties. The term self-occupied refers to a house that is being occupied by the assessee for residential purposes and which may also be occupied by family members.

Accordingly, a vacant house is also regarded as a self-occupied dwelling for income tax purposes. There are, however, some exceptions. In some cases, the assessee may not be able to occupy the property due to employment issues, and he or she may not derive any other benefits from it. Two or more houses can be treated as self-occupied, while any house other than those two is considered a rental property.

Calculation of income from self-occupied house property

The income deductible under ‘Income from house property’ is calculated as follows when considering self-occupied property:

  • Self-occupied properties are considered to have a Nil Gross Annual Value, from which the municipal taxes paid during the year are subtracted to arrive at the Net Annual Value (NAV) of the property.
  • The above-mentioned NAV is further deducted by two deductions under Section 24(a) Standard Deduction of 30 percent of NAV can be claimed under Section 24 (a), while the deduction for interest paid on borrowed capital (home loan) can be claimed under Section 24(b).
  • Section 24 deductions allow the resultant income to be taxed after deductions.

As the Gross Annual Value of a self-occupied property is Nil, one is always left with either Nil or a negative number (if one takes out a mortgage), which can be added to other sources of income.

Calculating rental income from a rental property

If the assessee rents out a house property even for a few months, the property is considered to be a rental house property, and the income tax is calculated accordingly.

The following steps will help you determine the income from a rental property:

  • Gross Annual Value (GAV) of the property: To begin, determine the amount of rent received each year.
  • Reduce property tax: Property tax is deducted from the GAV of a property when it has been paid.
  • Arriving at NAV: Deduct the Municipal Taxes paid during the year in order to arrive at the Net Annual Value (NAV).
  • Reduce 30% of NAV: Section 24 of the ITA allows a deduction of 30% on NAV. Subtract the Standard Deduction, 30 percent of the Net Annual Value, and any interest on the mortgage, if any, to get the final income from the let-out property.
  • Reducing home loan interest: In addition, the interest paid during the year on a housing loan qualifies for a deduction under Section 24.
  • Loss from house property: The deduction for home loan interest is not available when a self-occupied house is owned, since its GAV is zero. It can be offset against income from other heads.

The steps outlined above make it easy to calculate rent for self-occupied houses as well as rented houses. 

What is Section 24 of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Under Section 24 of the ITA, there are two deductions from annual value, i.e.,

  • 30% of NAV; and
  • Interest on borrowed capital.

Section 24(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

30% of NAV is allowed as a deduction under Section 24a of the ITA. This is a flat deduction and is allowed irrespective of the actual expenditure incurred. Due to the fact that the annual value itself is nil, the assessee will not be eligible for a deduction of 30%, in the following cases:

  • In case of self-occupied property; or
  • When the property is held as stock-in-trade and is not let for the whole year or for any part of the year prior, the certificate of completion of construction of the property may be obtained up to 2 years after the end of the financial year the certificate was obtained from the competent authority.

Section 24(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961

Interest on borrowed capital is allowed as a deduction under Section 24b. Deductions can be claimed for interest paid on loans taken out for acquisition, construction, repairs, or renewal. Deductions can also be made for the interest on an additional loan taken to repay the original loan raised earlier for the same purpose.

Interest for the pre-construction period

Pre-construction period is the period prior to the previous year in which property is acquired or construction is completed. Interest payable on borrowed capital for the period prior to the previous year in which the property has been acquired or constructed (Pre-construction interest), can be claimed as a deduction over a period of 5 years in equal annual installments commencing from the year of acquisition or completion of construction. Interest relating to the year of completion of construction/ acquisition of property can be fully claimed in that year irrespective of the date of completion/ acquisition.

Illustration:

The loan of Rs. 5,00,000 was taken on May 1, 2006. Construction was completed on September 7, 2021. It is estimated that the pre-construction/acquisition period will extend from May 1, 2006, until March 31, 2012. A pre-construction or pre-acquisition interest rate equal to Rs 3,55,000 (Rs 5,00,000*71 months*1%) shall be calculated.

Preconstruction/Acquisition Interest Deduction for FY 2012-13 to 2016-17 under the assumption that the property has been let out or is deemed to have been let out shall be equal to Rs 71,000 per year (3,55,000/5).

Pre Construction/Acquisition Interest Deduction for Financial Year 2012-13 to 2016-17 assuming SOP shall be Rs 71,000 per year (355000/5) since the construction is completed within 5 years from the end of the FY, in which capital was borrowed)

The interest from April 1, 2012-March 31, 2013 shall be deducted as current year interest in 2012-13. The period of interest from April 1, 2012-September 7, 2012 shall not be included in the pre-acquisition/construction period.

Even if your house property is in the same city in which you reside on a rented property, you can still claim House Rent Allowance under Section 10(13A) and interest deduction. In order to ensure that your employer takes into account this section of the tax code and deducts lower TDS, you will need to file Form 12BB with your employer.

In M/s.Windermere Properties Pvt.Ltd. (2013), the Court held that in addition to interest deductions, prepayment charges may also be deducted under Section 24b. It is not permissible to deduct interest on borrowed money payable outside India under section 24(b) unless the tax on it has been paid or deducted at source and there is no person in India who can be designated as the recipient’s agent for such purposes.

Deduction in case of co-borrower

When a home loan is taken on joint names, each of the co-borrowers has a deduction in proportion to his share of the loan. The co-borrower must also be part owner of the property in order to qualify for this deduction. An assessee who is a co-owner but pays back the full loan himself can deduct the interest he has paid. The deduction limit for self-occupied properties applies to each co-borrower separately. The deduction can be claimed by each co-borrower up to a total of Rs. 2 lakh/Rs. 30,000. There are no limits for letting out properties.

Difference between Section 24b and Section 80C

Section 24b allows interest on home loans while Section 80C allows principal on home loans. Listed below are comparisons between Sections 24 and 80C:

Tax deductions: 

Under Section 24b, tax Deduction is allowed only for interest, while under Section 80C the tax Deduction is allowed only for the principal.

Basis of tax deductions: 

The tax deduction under Section 24b is made on the basis of accrual basis, while the tax deduction under Section 80C is made on the basis of cash basis.

Amount of deduction: 

Under Section 24b the amount of deduction in the self-occupied property is Rs. 2,00,000, from the assessment year 2015-16, and in cases other than the self-occupied property, there is no limit. On the other hand, under Section 80C, the amount of deduction is Rs. 1,50,000, from the assessment year 2015-16.

Purpose of loan: 

The purpose of a loan under Section 24b should be for the purchase or construction or repair or renewal or reconstruction of a residential house property. Under Section 80C, the purpose of a loan should be for the purchase or construction of a new house property.

Eligibility for claiming Tax deduction: 

Eligibility for claiming tax deduction under Section 24b is that purchase or construction should be completed within 3 years, and under Section 80C, there is no eligibility.

Restriction on sale of property: 

Under Section 24b, there is no restriction on the sale of property, however, there is a restriction under Section 80C. Under Section 80C, the tax deduction claimed would be reversed if the property is sold within 5 years from the end of the financial year in which such property is acquired by him.

Deduction during construction period: 

Under Section 24b, the interest paid during the construction or the acquisition period shall be allowed in 5 equal installments from the last day of the preceding Financial Year in which the construction is completed, and under Section 80C, no deduction is available for the principal repayment during the construction/acquisition period.

Basically, a deduction of 30 percent on a property’s net annual value is provided by Section 24. For self-occupied properties, the deduction is ‘nil’ according to the IT Act, regardless of whether municipal taxes have been paid or not. Thus, if a purchaser purchases a property with his own resources, that is, without obtaining a mortgage, and generates rental income from it, he can claim Rs 30 as a deduction from every Rs 100 earned. In the case of self-occupied properties, however, the owner may not take advantage of Section 24 deductions.

As a matter of clarification, it is important to note that income derived from house property is taxed on its net annual value rather than its gross annual value. An estimate of the net annual value of a property is derived by deducting the amount paid to the municipal government as part of the tax bill. It should also be noted that this section applies to buyers who have financed the purchase, construction, repair, renewal or reconstruction of the property using a mortgage. There are two possible outcomes in such cases:

  • For properties that do not generate income (self-owned or vacant properties), the borrower can claim a deduction for the interest paid on the home loan up to Rs 2 lakhs under Section 24.
  • If the property generates income for the borrower through rental income, then the borrower is entitled to deduct the entire interest component associated with the home loan. It is intended to encourage property owners to rent out vacant properties.

Deductions under Section 24 of Income Tax Act, 1961

The following are the deductions provided under Section 24 of ITA:

Standard deduction

Taxpayers may benefit from a standard deduction of 30% based on their net annual income. By default, this deduction is not available for self-occupied properties. With a self-occupied property, the annual net value is zero and therefore the standard deduction is also nil.

Deduction on interest on a home loan

The owners of the house are able to claim an income tax deduction of Rs. 2 lakhs (Rs. 1,50,00,000, in case of filing income tax returns for the FY 2013-2014) on the interest of the home loan, if the owner is living with his family. It should also be noted that if the house is vacant, it is also eligible for the same treatment. However, if the house is rented out, the entire interest from the home loan is deductible. House owners who do not meet any of the following conditions cannot receive a rebate of up to Rs.2 lakhs on the interest on their home loan. In such a case his income tax rebate on the home loan interest cannot be more than Rs.30, 000. Therefore, to claim a deduction of Rs.2 lakhs in income tax, you must meet the following requirements:

  • A home loan must be taken on or after April 1, 1999.
  • Construction or purchase of a home may be the purpose of the loan.
  • Within five years from the end of the financial year in which the home loan was taken, the construction or purchase for which the loan is taken should be completed.

To be eligible for deductions under Section 24 of the ITA, a person needs to compute the amount of interest that has to be paid by him/her to the financial institution or bank for the grant of the loan; separate from the repayment of the principal. No matter how much one is paying to the loan lender, he/she gets tax exemptions on the whole annual interest amount.

Here are a few things to note under Section 24:

  • When you do not live in the house, you are entitled to claim a tax deduction for the entire interest amount that you are paying.
  • If you do not live in the house due to employment or business commitments, and you live in another property or rented property in the city of employment, then your tax exemption on interest payment is restricted to Rs. 2 lakh.
  • In the case of arranging a loan or a tenant, no brokerage fee or commission is deducted.
  • In order to claim maximum deductions on loan interest, you must complete the house construction or purchase within 3 years after taking the loan. The amount you can claim instead of Rs. 2 lakh will be only Rs. 30,000 if the construction or purchase is not completed within three years.
  • The loan that you are taking needs to be backed up by an interest certificate.

In Mr. Abeezar Faizullabhoy v. CIT (ITAT Mumbai) (2019), the Court stated that for any acquisition, construction, repair, renewal, or reconstruction of a property, an assessee is entitled to deduct any interest payable on the capital borrowed. By way of an agreement dated September 20, 2009, the assessee acquired the residential property in question.

The issue of this case was:

Is it appropriate for the lower authorities to deny the assessee’s claim for an interest deduction on a loan that was used to purchase a residential house pursuant to a registered “agreement” dated 20.09.2009, in light of the law and the facts of the case?

As per the Court’s considered opinion, there is neither a precondition nor an eligibility requirement that an assessee has taken possession of the property purchased or acquired by him in order to claim deductions for interest under Section 24(b) of the Act. Accordingly, the first and second provisions of Section 24(b) only contemplate an inherent upper limit of deduction for residential properties referred to in sub-section (2) of Section 23.

Nevertheless, the aforesaid provisos do not affect the right of an assessee to deduct the amount of interest he pays on any capital borrowed to acquire, construct, repair, renew or reconstruct a residential property that is not within the scope of sub­section (2) of Section 23 of the Act. Furthermore, the Court was unable to accept the view of the Income-tax tribunal that since the assessee would not have any control/domain over the property in question, deduction under Section 24(b) of the said property would seem inconceivable.

According to Section 22 read with Section 23 of the Act, the annual lettable value of a property is determined based on the ownership of the property, without regard to whether it has yet been occupied by the assessee. While it is true that the plain literal interpretation of Section 24(b) of the Act does not prohibit assessees from claiming deductions for interest due on loans taken for buying residential properties, even if a possession did not vest with him, even otherwise, the logic put forward by the CIT(A) for declining the assessee’s claim clearly runs contrary to the mandate of Section 22 to 24 of the Act.

Since the assessee in the case before had admitted to having paid interest of Rs. 2,69,842.12 on the capital that was borrowed by him for acquiring the property in question, which was evidently borne out by the certificate filed in assessment proceedings, the Court was unable to buy into the lower authorities’ decision not to allow him to deduct interest pursuant to Section 24(b) of the Act. Therefore, the Court held that the Assessing Officer (AO) should allow the assessee’s claim for deduction of Rs. 2,00,000 under Section 24(b) of the Act.

Section 24 and Section 80EE of the Income Tax Act, 1961

For loans taken between 1 April 2019 and 31 March 2022, the government has now extended the interest deduction, under the objective “Housing for all”. In order to enable interest deductions in AY 2020-21 (FY 2019-20), a new Section 80EEA has been inserted. For loans sanctioned from a financial institution from 1 April 2016 to 31 March 2017, the old Section 80EE permitted first-time homebuyers to deduct up to Rs 50,000 in interest paid.

The government has extended the benefit for FY 2019-20 in order to further the benefit and stimulate the real estate sector.. The deduction can be claimed until the loan is repaid.

Under the Income Tax Act, Section 24 and Section 80EE are closely interrelated. An assessee can claim a tax deduction against the interest payable on a loan when calculating their income.

However, the following conditions must be met:

  • A home loan is taken to acquire a house property for residential purposes only.
  • In order to get a residential property, the borrower seeks a loan from any financial institution.
  • This loan must be approved between 1st April 2016 and 31st March 2017.
  • The taxpayer must not own another house on the date of sanction.
  • A loan sanctioned for a residential house is less than Rs 35 lakh.
  • The property value is less than Rs 50 lakh.

Both sections allow an assessee to claim a deduction. It is simply a matter of satisfying the conditions under both sections. To begin with, claim tax benefits under Section 24 up to Rs 2 lakh. The next Rs 50,000 of home loan interest can be claimed under Section 80EE. Thus, you will be able to claim Rs 2,50,000 against interest. 

Conclusion

One of the most common long-term investment objectives of Indians is buying a house. EMIs on a home loan consume a considerable amount of one’s income. In other words, the government offers a wide range of tax incentives for residential property under Section 24 of the Income Tax Act. Although section 24 is not an independent part of the income tax act, those provisions have been incorporated in all succeeding income tax acts. Renting out your property can earn you money. Several attractive deductions are available under section 24 of the Income Tax Act when it comes to real estate income. Thus, a rental income will have a lower effective tax rate than an ordinary wage tax. Income from goods is taxed under the Indian Income Tax Act. Whether the property is used for residential use, industrial use, or both, taxes are due. Buildings can be residential, office buildings, shops, factories, halls, etc., as well as land associated with them, i.e., gardens, buildings, playgrounds, and car parks.

According to Section 24, the borrower must pay taxes on rental property income when a borrower owns rental property, which is one of the few sources of income where actual income must be reported. During the lease consideration process, the income that the asset can earn is assessed. Unless one dwelling house is included in the taxable income, all income from private property, leased property, and vacant property (including houses) is taxable as “Income from the Property”.

References


Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/lawyerscommunity

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Online reputation management : best practices

0

This article is written by Balasaheb Pandhare pursuing a Diploma in International Business Law. This article has been edited by Ojuswi (Associate Lawsikho). 

This article has been published by Sneha Mahawar.

Introduction

The Covid-19 pandemic compelled governments to impose restrictions and lockdowns in India which resulted in slowing down the business activities in almost all sectors. At the same time, this pandemic turned out to be a huge catalyst in engaging the people of India in online activities.  People are opting for the online modes to carry out different activities such as payments, trading, shopping, education, e-commerce, and business.

Users of the internet are growing rapidly in India. The internet penetration rate is reaching towards 47 percent against the current population. This data mandates every business entity, brand or personality to mark its presence online to catch the markets available online, at the same time they also have to face the criticism of consumers and the general public as the digital platform is available to all. Therefore, anybody can comment on any service providers or product manufacturers whether they avail of services or buy the product or not. This situation has led to maintaining the reputation of the brand, company, business entity, or person in the online form. As consumers nowadays before availing of any services use to conduct online research about such an entity, and use to consider any reviews made against such a product, and then decide whether to move further or not. 

Yelp, an American company, enables customers to comment and post reviews about the product and services available in the local market. Some small business owners from California filed a suit against Yelp alleging that Yelp is managing the negative reviews against them and extorting money from them for advertisements of their services. In Levitt v Yelp Inc. the District Court of California dismissed the complaint of the plaintiff and on appeal, the United States Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the district court. Therefore any business owner can create an account and manage the review page of its brand to secure its online reputation. In the Indian context, the Delhi High Court in  Jubilant Foodworks Ltd. v Pratik Vinit and Ors dealt with a case of one student who received a non-vegetarian pizza instead of the vegetarian he ordered, being dissatisfied with this order from Domino’s he tweeted the contact number of the senior officer against this tweet domino’s filed a suit of injunction in Delhi High Court against the student which was later on withdrawn by the company once the student deleted the alleged tweet Hence creating and maintaining a reputation online has become a new challenge for the business entities and there were mushrooming of firms in this area providing services in online reputation management. Against this backdrop, it is desirable to study the phenomenon of online reputation management. This article is an attempt to analyse the concept of online reputation management from both legal and technical perspectives

Online reputation management: a conceptual discourse

Increasing growth of the internet and social media users makes it inevitable for any brand or company operating online to maintain its reputation in the public positively and to avoid or manage any comments or reviews that will injure the reputation of such a business.  This phenomenon of managing online reputation is referred to as online reputation management. It also covers the promotion and expansion of a brand to establish a better relationship with potential consumers and develop an influential online reputation for such a business. In this context, it is necessary to study the concept of online reputation management.

Generally, if any concept is regulated or prohibited by the statute then we can trace the definition of such concept in that statute itself, however, in the case of online reputation management it is neither regulated nor prohibited by any statute in India. Therefore we have to rely on online sources to find out the concept of online reputation management to have a complete understanding.

Meaning and definition

Generally for any academic discourse definitions and meanings are provided in statutes, case laws, or international instruments however the concept of online reputation is not created by the statute or any government entity nor by any business organisation but rather developed as a practice to streamline certain negative publicity by adopting different techniques or strategies by using technology or other skills.  Therefore to trace the meaning of online reputation, we have to take recourse to dictionaries or webpages of those entities that provide services of online reputation management.

Online Reputation Management is the practice of crafting strategies that shape or influence the public perception of an organisation, individual or other entity on the internet. According to Techopedia, Online Reputation Management is a method adopted by an entity to mitigate the effects of negative viral comments and to create proactive marketing strategies for online consumption.

Online reputation can be explained as a general public opinion or knowledge of an entity, individual or corporate internet presence. It signifies the creation and development of personal or professional internet platforms and management of such platforms for positive growth and increased trust among internet users.

Significance of online reputation management

Every business uses to invest for its prosperity and economic development and if such business is dealing in the e-commerce sector then it is inevitable for them to keep their online image clear. As every e-commerce entity is conscious of its online presence and expects greater search visibility. It is proved through research that people use to take and change their decisions based on reviews or comments published on the website of a particular entity about the nature and quality offered by such an entity. Therefore the importance of online reputation management cannot be ignored in today’s era. Recently a South Korean Company Hyundai from its Pakistan Twitter account made a post in support of Kashmir’s freedom struggle with the hashtag #KashmirSolidarityDay against this India summoned the envoy of the Republic of Korea and lodged strong displeasure and the foreign minister of Korea expressed his regret over this. Thereafter the post in question was removed by the Hyundai.

Legal perspectives of online reputation management

In India, any activity either offline or online must have to be carried out within the boundaries of the law. The concept of law is defined under Article 13 of the Constitution of India as it covers law enacted by the competent sovereign legislature, ordinance by-laws, and even customs, subject to the requirement of having the force of law. Therefore, the question is whether the online reputation management strategies practised by companies, brands, or individuals are prohibited or regulated by law. To answer this question we have to explore existing legislation preventing or in any way regulating this practice. No such legislation expressly till the time dealt with the practice of online reputation management, therefore it can be said that subject to any law or decisions of the court online reputation management and strategies adopted for the same are perfectly legal. On the other hand, according to prevailing legal principles in India, whatever is not prohibited is permitted, this aspect was recently endorsed by the highest court of India in Internet and Mobile Association of India v Reserve Bank of India dealing with the regulation of digital currencies by the Reserve Bank of India.

The reputation of any business entity is considered as its property, hence they have a right under law to protect and preserve their property, even the law of crime confers the right to private defense on all people to protect their as well as the property of others in case any offence against such property is in operation. On the contrary, the general public also has a legitimate right to express their opinion about the company brand or individual over the quality and service delivered by such entities as a consumer as well as a general public. At the same time, it must be taken into account by the general public that any right guaranteed to them is not absolute but subject to restrictions imposed by law. In this context Article 19(2) is important to highlight as this article provided the grounds to make a law imposing reasonable restrictions on the freedom of speech and expression given to the citizens. Therefore while commenting or making a review of any product one must not defame, use abusive language, or insult such a company or entity both online or online platform. Section 4 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 expressly recognizes all online transactions for legal purposes as it confers legal recognition on electronic data exchange and e-commerce. This Act also lays down distinct offences and penalties if the online platform were used for the commission of any activities mentioned above,  such as making a misleading or false comment, defaming a company online, tempering with computer source code, hacking with the computer system, making offensive comments publication of obscene information, etc,  From this discussion, it can be said that online reputation management is perfectly a legal strategy adopted by an entity to protect its reputation from being damaged online.

Best practices of online reputation management

Every business entity nowadays uses it to protect its online reputation. For this they adopt certain practices either by hiring a firm providing paid services about online reputation management or they may set up a team for online reputation management.  In both cases, they have to adopt certain strategies or best practices to maintain the online reputation of any brand or entity. These best practices are nothing but the set of guidelines, ethics, or ideas that represent the most efficient or prudent course of action in a given business situation.  Such practices may be established by authorities such as regulators, self-regulatory organisations, or governing bodies or they may be internally decided by companies’ management teams.  

Some of the best practices that can be adopted to maintain an online reputation are discussed hereunder. On 9th March 2021, one lady complained about the delayed food delivery from Zomato and a consequent assault on her by the delivery boy because of the adverse review made online against such delivery. However later the delivery boy put forth his version and said that he was assaulted by the lady initially therefore he attacked her as a matter of private defence. Accordingly, police complaints were filed from both sides and the case is ongoing. However, to maintain its online reputation Zomato declared that they will provide every assistance to the lady both in police matters as well as in medical care and they have temporarily suspended the delivery boy as a protocol of escort. The following steps can be taken to ensure online reputation management. 

Ensure maximum online brand exposure

The term online reputation management itself indicates the requirement of the continued online existence of a brand. The brand must ensure that they are exploring almost all social media platforms and creating their profiles on all such platforms.  Generally, prominent social media platforms were used by the majority of brands such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram but in a real sense, deep exploration of the internet is a much-required exercise nowadays.

While proceeding, towards an online platform a brand can have a research and find out which platform is mostly used by their regular customers so that they can focus more, steadily on the platform identified specifically through such research. For this, a company can also create questionnaires and circulate them on its platform. Hence, for brands, it is inevitable to see emerging and best social media platforms.

While remaining active online an entity has to deal with other brands also for related services that are usually referred as business to business transactions. In such cases, one has to develop professional relations with other entities, for such concerns once presence is a must on the platforms like AngelList, Opportunity, LinkedIn, Meetup, etc. At the same time, a brand managing its online reputation also requires vigilance in the area of young generations and their social media attitude which is frequently changing. This covers the relationship between business and customers. They should have complete attention to emerging platforms in these social media sectors such as Snapchat, Wechat, Clubhouse, Telegram, etc.

Therefore, the first and most important strategy to be adopted to have effective online reputation management is to give the fullest exposure to the brand or company on all possible online platforms.

Sony’s PlayStation used to continue to post different types of content engaging consumers on Twitter is an example of showing how to increase followers on Twitter. According to UnMetric, during the last five years alone 12 million followers were added to the PlayStation over Twitter due to the maximum exposure and continued existence over Twitter.

new legal draft

Time frame scrutiny of social media account

The next important policy that needs to be implemented by the company to maintain its online reputation is time-bound scrutiny of all the accounts, wherever they created their profiles because once they created the number of accounts to give maximum exposure to their product and services they must have to visit the said account day today and have to scrutinise it in the light of recent developments happening around the relevant business sector.  To keep these accounts evergreen they have to post and share content, blogs and Case Comments relevant to respective products and services. This policy will increase the interactiveness of related web pages and be able to get a prominent place during searches. Otherwise, the concerned page may become prone to negative comments or reviews.

The Social media giants Twitter, Facebook and WhatsApp decided to remove fake accounts from its platform in the wake of proposed guidelines to be framed by the Government of India to regulate social media in India. As they were accused of spreading fake news and hate speeches in India.

Increase the online visibility of services

The products and services made available by the company must be made visible on relevant accounts or pages. Companies can create separate web pages advertising its product and services. For this, engaging strategies like story-related or news-related events can be created by engaging the blog writers so that it will result in the online visibility of the services offered by a company or brand. 

Tata Motors launched its new car Bolt by taking recourse to Blogadda one of the largest blogging platforms, wherein brands engage with the bloggers from different sectors this strategy will increase the online visibility of the product of Tata motors. 

Linking of employees with social media accounts of entity

To manage the reputation of a business on online platforms, its employee’s support is a must. A company should ensure that the online presence of employees is resulting in strengthening the online reputation of its product and services. The company may insert conditions to that effect in the appointment order or may do this through incentives. But creative employees are proved to be the backbones of any institution. Therefore optimum use of employees by linking their social media accounts or by creating a distinct page on their profile will help in securing online reputation management.

Bank of Baroda’s Social media policy framed for its employees makes it mandatory for its employees to positively comment on the product and services provided by the bank on social media forums. Further, it expressly prohibits its employees to make such a type of comment which adversely affects the status of the bank in the eyes of the general public and its potential consumers.

Dedicated team for diligent online reviews and responses

There must be an encouragement to the clients as well as the general public to write reviews and articles exploring the product and services offered by the company.  A review of the newly released product and services must be promptly made available to potential consumers. There must be a dedicated response team to reply to reviews written or comments made by the people in respect of the quality or quantity of the service offered by the company. The review may be positive or negative; it must be responded to as early as possible. If the need is felt one must be ready to apologise to the customers. Almost all brands working in the eCommerce sector such as Flipkart, Amazon, and Myntra have a dedicated team to reply diligently to any comment made against their services.

Conclusion

Business entities have to run with the time as time is running fast, the entity must have to chase such a time to survive in today’s competitive market strategies. At the same time, they must have to balance the conflicting interest among the consumers while replying to the comments or reviews posted online about the entity or its services. It will be financially injurious for the entity to support a particular group while answering the comment or reviews, therefore the replying strategy must have a balanced approach. Online reputation management is the need of the hour. The customer usually prefers to buy products online. They were also expressing their views about the treatment received by them on social platforms. Therefore, it is a matter of business backwardness if any brand or company is lagging in securing and maintaining its online reputation. By adopting the policies above-mentioned one can maintain the online reputation of one’s own business effectively.

References


Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/lawyerscommunity

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Comparison : India’s Data Protection Bill and EU Regulation

0
consumer data protection

This article has been written by Devangi Vatsaraj, pursuing an MBA with a Specialisation in Data Protection and Privacy Management (From Swiss School of Management) from LawSikho.

This article has been published by Rachit Garg.

Introduction

Data protection legislation around the globe requires that individuals’ data be protected when it is processed and moves freely. The legal requirements of processing the data include the need for the data to be processed fairly and lawfully, to be updated and accurate, to have measures to mitigate accidental loss, and for data to be transferred to only such countries with adequate levels of data protection in place. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is by far the toughest privacy law in the world. The European Union Regulation, i.e., the GDPR was put into effect on May 25, 2018, and has set high-security standards, the violation of which attracts harsh fines. The regulation has a large, far-reaching impact; signalling its firm stance on data security, the GDPR has encouraged other nations to implement and adopt such privacy measures in place, to make compliance a daunting prospect.

The Indian legislation is highly influenced by the GDPR and was tabled as the “Personal Data Protection Bill” (PDPB) before the Lok Sabha on December 11, 2019. The rationale behind this legislation is to address the emerging concerns regarding privacy and data protection issues, which can be curbed by creating an environment that encourages the growth of fair practices in the digital economy and abstaining from invading the privacy of individuals.

Since the PDPB has taken its shape from the GDPR, the principles of the Indian legislation are similar to the provisions of the European Union’s legislation. However, some provisions vary in the two data privacy legislations. This article analyzes some of the key differences in these legislations.

Jurisdiction and Scope

Territorial Scope

GDPR: GDPR is applicable to organizations that have an establishment in the European Union (EU) and processes personal data in the EU establishment; such organizations that are not established in the EU but process personal data in relation to (a) offering goods or services in the EU; or (b) monitoring the behaviour of individuals in the EU.

PDPB: PDPB is applicable to the processing of personal data that has been collected, disclosed, shared, or otherwise processed within the territory of India; to such Indian companies, Indian citizens, and any other persons or bodies incorporated under the Indian law; and to such organizations that are not present in India, but process personal data in connection with (a) business carried out in India or any offering of goods or services to individuals in India or (b) an activity that involves profiling individuals in the territory of  India.

Analysis: The scope of application of the PDPB is broader than that of the GDPR, as an organization may fall within scope simply by processing personal data in India. 

Further, as per the PDPB, it is unclear whether an organization must be based in India for this territorial basis to apply; however, the reference to “data fiduciaries or data processors not present within the territory of India” in Section 2(A)(c) suggests that this basis for jurisdiction should be read to apply only to organizations which have a presence in India. However, the scope of GDPR is meticulously outlined and systematically categorized.

The Central Government is permitted to exempt any data processor or class thereof from the scope of the PDPB in the context of outsourced services, where (a) the processor is contracted by a person or an organization based outside of India; and (b) the processing relates only to individuals outside of India. There is no such exemption in the GDPR.

Material Scope

GDPR: GDPR is applicable to the data that relates to a naturally identified and/or identifiable person as well as special categories of such personal data.

Processing of anonymized data is out of scope.

PDPB: PDBP is applicable to personal data, sensitive personal data as well as critical personal data.

The central government is authorised to prescribe new categories of sensitive personal data and determines the eligibility of critical personal data.

The Central Government may direct organizations to disclose anonymized personal data and even non-personal data.

Analysis: The GDPR does not govern anonymised data, while the PDPB allows the government to access non-personal data, for specific purposes.

Standards of anonymization may differ between the PDPB and the GDPR.

Relevant parties

GDPR: Under the GDPR, the naturally identified or identifiable person whose data is in question, is known as the “Data Subject”; an entity that collects the data of the data subjects and determines the purposes and means of the processing of personal data is known as “Data Controller” and the entity that process such data is known as “Data Processor”.

PDPB: These terms is defined as “Data Principal”, “Data Fiduciary” and “Data Processor” under the PDPB.

Analysis: The terminology may vary, while the definitions and concepts of the terms are generally similar. 

General principles regarding the lawfulness of processing data

new legal draft

GDPR: There are seven principles laid out under the GDPR, namely, lawfulness, fairness, and transparency; data minimization, purpose limitation, storage limitation, accuracy, accountability, and integrity & confidentiality. All these principles are carved out vide Article 5 of the legislation.

PDPB: The PDPB does not explicitly carve out principles but refers to a number of provisions that impose similar requirements, as stated in the GDPR. Some of these requirements are as follows: 

  • Section 4 of the PDPB states that the personal data may not be processed by any person “except for any specific, clear and lawful purpose”;
  • Section 5 (a) of the PDPB states that the personal data must be processed “in a fair and reasonable manner and ensure the privacy of the data principal”;
  • Section 5 (b) of the PDPB states that the personal data must be processed “for the purpose consented to by the data principal or which is incidental to or connected with such purpose, and which the data principal would reasonably expect that such personal data shall be used for, having regard to the purpose, and in the context and circumstances in which the personal data was collected”;
  • Section 6 of the PDPB states that the personal data must be “collected only to the extent that is necessary for the purposes of processing of such personal data”; 
  • Section 8 of the PDPB states that the data fiduciaries must “take necessary steps to ensure that the personal data processed is complete, accurate, not misleading and updated, having regard to the purpose for which it is processed,” taking into consideration various factors such as whether: (a) the data is likely to be used to make a decision about the data principal; (b) the data is likely to be disclosed; or (c) is kept in a form that distinguishes facts from opinions or personal assessments, etc.;
  • Section 9 of the PDPB states that the data fiduciaries may “not retain any personal data beyond the period necessary to satisfy the purpose for which it is processed and shall delete the personal data at the end of the processing” in the manner specified by regulations unless the data principal provides explicit consent or the processing is required by law;
  • Section 10 of the PDPB states that the data fiduciaries are “responsible for complying with the provisions of this Act in respect of any processing undertaken by it or on its behalf” 

Analysis: Although we may consider that the provisions of the PDPB have been framed on similar grounds that of the GDPR, the PDPB puts more emphasis on the legal principles and require more specific or direct adherence to these requirements. 

An important differentiator with respect to consent as a principle is that the GDPR emphasizes more consent as a concept for the information to be specific and meaningful, while consent as implied by the PDPB, highlights more on the information being transparent. Further, the accuracy requirement under the PDPB is more specific; it not only requires the data to be accurate (as in GDPR) but also necessitates whether the data is an opinion, assessment, or merely a fact. The storage limitation principle of the GDPR states that the data may be retained as long as it is anonymised, masked, or encrypted so that it is no longer personally identifiable; however, the PDPB requires absolute deletion of data once the purpose of collection has been achieved. 

Legal bases for processing personal data

GDPR: There are six main legal grounds for the lawfulness of personal data processing and these are consent, performance of a contract, legitimate interest, vital interest, legal requirement, and public interest.

PDPB: The Bill provides for seven legal bases for processing personal data: consent, legal obligation, a medical emergency involving a threat to life or severe threat to health, providing medical/health services, protecting the safety of individuals during a disaster, employment purposes; and for reasonable purposes.

Analysis: Reasonable purpose under the PDPB is anything as may be specified by regulations; some examples include whistle-blowing, network, and information security, preventing unlawful activity, etc. These reasonable purposes sound similar to the GDPR’s base of legitimate interest but are limited to purposes that are specified by regulation and are not very inclusive in nature. Further, the bases for health and safety or that of employment as separately carved out in the PDPB, are inclusive in the GDPR’s legitimate interest or the public interest bases. 

Rights of individuals

Right of transparency:

GDPR: The GDPR provides that information must be provided in a concise, transparent, intelligible, and easily accessible form, using clear and plain language. Further, when data is collected directly from the data subject, notice as to the collection and purpose (detailed requirement must be included) must be given prior to the collection of data and when it is collected indirectly, the data subject must be informed within a month from a collection of the data.  

PDPB: The bill states that the notice for collection of data must be given at the time of collection, or as reasonably soon as possible and such notice must in clear, concise, and easily comprehensible. Further, it highlights that wherever necessary, such notice must be translated to a different language.

Analysis: The transparency requirements seem to overlap in both the frameworks, however, the translation requirement is unique to the PDPB (considering the cultural, ethnic, and language variation throughout the country), while such requirement cannot be found in GDPR. Further, the PDPB includes additional requirements such as handling individual requests and grievances; providing a data trust score assigned by a data auditor (pursuant to the audit provisions as laid by in the PDPB).

Right to access:

GDPR: The GDPR states that the data subjects have the right to receive information about how their personal data is processed and can ask for a copy of their data, which is being processed by the organization. The exception to this rule is that when providing such access if personal data of other data subjects is compromised or intellectual property rights violated, in such cases, the organizations are not obligated to provide access to data.

PDPB: The data subjects have a right to receive access to whether their personal data is processed by the organization and to receive a copy/summary thereof; with an only exception where such access harms the rights of other data subjects. The PDPB has provided that the record must also provide whether data has been shared by the data fiduciary and the type/nature of the data shared.  

Analysis: Though the requirements are similar, the GDPR lays down that the access must be provided within 30 days (subject to extension, if provided), while the PDPB says that the timeline for responding shall be as specified by the different regulations. The exception to this request under the PDPB shall not permit withholding personal data on the grounds of intellectual property. By providing access to records to data shared by data fiduciaries under the PDPB, new administrative burdens will increase as this would also require documenting any onward transfers by data fiduciaries to whom personal data is disclosed.

Right to data portability:

GDPR: The law states that where the right to data portability applies, personal data must be provided in a structured and machine-readable format. However, if the rights of other data subjects are compromised in the process, then, the data must not be provided. The right to portability applies only when the processing of data is under the legal bases of consent or performance of a contract. Moreover, the processing must be by automated means and only applies when a data subject has given the data to the controller.

PDPB: Here, in addition to what has been provided in the GDPR, the right to portability also arises when data has been generated in the course of the transaction and which forms a part of the profile of a data subject. The data fiduciary is exempted to act upon such request when compliance would reveal a trade secret or providing such data not be technically feasible.

Analysis: One of the major differences between the two frameworks is that under the GDPR, the right only arises when the data is collected/processed under the legal bases of contract or consent; however, under the PDPB, the right applies irrespective of the legal base. 

Right to Rectification:

Both frameworks encourage that inaccurate and misleading data be corrected. The right is majorly similar in both the skeletons with minor superficial changes.

Right to be forgotten:

GDPR: The data subject can request that their data be erased; where the purpose of collection of data has been sufficient, where the data subject withdraws consent or objects to the processing, and where processing is unlawful or deletion is required by law. When the controller undertakes to delete the data, it must also inform about the same to the data fiduciaries and/or the third parties with whom they might have shared the data. However, there are various loopholes available to the controller, such as exercising legal claims, conducting certain research, legitimate interest, etc.

PDPB: This framework divides the right into two parts – the right to erasure and the right to be forgotten. The right to erasure provides for the deletion of personal data that is no longer necessary for the purpose for which it was processed; while the right to be forgotten provides for restriction of continuous disclosure of personal data. To enforce the right, data subjects must apply to an Adjudicating Officer, who takes into account a number of factors and decides if the restriction is justified.

Analysis: The PDPB 2019 distinguishes between two separate rights; one for erasure and one for restricting the disclosure of personal data. The PDPB places responsibility for determining the scope of application of the right to be forgotten on Adjudicating Officers; while such responsibility is on the controller under the GDPR.

Protection of Children’s Rights

There are various conditions that both the legislations have laid down in respect to how data subjects’ information must be collected, processed, and retained/deleted and how to treat sensitive data and critical data differently from normal data. Not going into every detail on how both the legislations handle the delicacy of the data, in this article, we’ll focus on how the protection of the rights of the children is handled in both jurisdictions. 

GDPR: GDPR, vide its Article 8, imposes additional obligations when collecting consent from children under the age of 16 or at an age set by the respective Member States. The laws state that in relation to the offering of information society services directly to a child, the processing of the personal data shall be lawful where the child is at least 16 years old. Where the child is below such age, processing shall be lawful only if and to the extent of the consent given or is authorised by the parent/guardian of the child. It is also pertinent to note that the law states that significant automated decisions should not be taken by those concerned children.

PDPB: Data fiduciaries are required to verify a child’s age and obtain consent from a parent/guardian before processing any personal data of a child (someone below the age of 18). The general obligation to process personal data is that it should be processed in such a manner that children’s rights are protected and decisions are made which are in the best interests of children. 

Analysis: The very first difference between the two legislations is that the age of differentiation of whether an individual is a child or not – 16 years under GDPR and 18 years in PDPB. Further, the verification of a child’s age as mentioned in PDPB is not present in the GDPR and the parental consent for the processing of children’s data as specified in PDBP applies to all types of processing, unlike the GDPR, where it applies only when consent is the legal base of processing the data.

Appointment of a representative

Such controllers and/or processors not established in the EU but processing data on EU citizens or are subjected to the GDPR must appoint a representative in the EU, except if the processing is occasional and does not involve large-scale processing of sensitive data.

No such requirement is provided for in the PDPB.

Registration with Data Processing Authorities (DPA)

The PDPB has introduced a requirement for significant data fiduciaries (which are notified considering the volume and sensitivity of data processed, risk of harm and the use of technology, etc.) to register with the DPA in accordance with the regulations. No such requirement is provided for in the GDPR.

Appointment of a Data Protection Officer (DPO)

GDPR: A DPO is required only when the core activity of the controller/processor involves (a) regular and systematic monitoring of data subjects on a large scale or (b)  large-scale processing of sensitive data. DPO must have sufficient independence and skill and must be able to report to the highest levels of management. Though DPOs may be outsourced, it is recommended that the DPO should be based in the EU.

PDPB: A DPO is required to be appointed for all significant data fiduciaries and must represent the fiduciary in front of the authorities. Also, the DPO must be based in India.

Analysis: The PDPB leaves it to the DPA to determine what a significant data fiduciary is and therefore, comparison to the GDPR’s thresholds and that of PDBP, for appointing a DPO becomes difficult. Further, representing the fiduciary (as provided for in the PDPB) raises the question of whether the Indian DPO could be subject to personal liability.

Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)

GDPR: This requires controllers to conduct a DPIA for (a) systematic and extensive profiling, (b) processing sensitive data on a large scale, (c) systematic monitoring of a publicly accessible area on a large scale and other activities posing high risks. When such risks cannot be mitigated, the controller must consult with the DPA before processing the data.

PDPB: This requires the significant data fiduciaries to conduct a DPIA where the processing involves (a) new technologies, (b)  large-scale profiling or use of sensitive data, or (c) any other activities that carry a significant risk of harm. All DPIAs must be submitted to the DPA for review.

Analysis: While the requirement to conduct DPIAs may be similar in the two frameworks, there is a significant difference in the submission of the report with the DPA – while GDPR requires submission only when risks cannot be mitigated, PDPB requires submission of every DPIA.

Audit Requirements

The PDPB provides that the significant data fiduciaries must submit their processing to annual audits by independent auditors. The data auditors may assign a data trust score to a data fiduciary based on their findings. This is a new development that does not find a place in the GDPR. The only audit requirement under the GDPR is when the processors agree to the audit provisions in their contract with the respective controller.

Breach Notification

GDPR: The controllers must notify the DPA of a breach within 72 (seventy-two) hours unless the breach is unlikely to result in a risk to individuals and such breach is to be reported only when it results in high risk. Similarly, the processors must also notify the controller of a breach without undue delay.

PDPB: The data fiduciaries must notify the DPA of a breach as soon as possible if it is likely to cause harm to any data subject and the DPA may direct such fiduciary to post about such breach on their website or may post the same on DPA’s website.

Analysis: The threshold for a reportable breach is higher under the PDPB, as it must be “likely” that the breach will cause harm to the data subjects. The PDPB leaves it to the DPA to establish the deadline for notification of breaches, while the deadline for reporting a breach under the GDPR is laid down by the law as 72 hours. There is no express requirement on processors to notify the data controller of the breach; however, it may be implicit from the data controller’s responsibility that it will need to secure this obligation from its processors by way of a contract.

International Data Transfer

GDPR: The personal data of the data subjects can be transferred outside the EU and the European Economic Area only when the recipient is in a territory considered by the European Commission to offer an adequate level of protection for the personal data or appropriate safeguards are put in places, such as standard contractual clauses or Binding Corporate Rules; or when the data subjects provide explicit consent to such transfer and/or the transfer is required under public interest.

PDPB:  A copy of sensitive personal data may only be transferred outside of India when the data subject provides explicit consent, and the transfer is made pursuant to a contract or intra-group scheme approved by the DPA. The DPA has specifically authorized the transfer or the government has deemed another country on having adequate protection.

Analysis: Though the transfer mechanisms are similar in both the frameworks, the PDBP requires collecting the explicit consent of the data subject (even when the transfer is to a country that has adequate safety measures as approved by the DPA). The PDBP subjects only the sensitive data to the transfer restrictions, however, the Reserve Bank of India has promulgated requirements to localize the financial data in India.

Penalties

GDPR: This law sets forth fines of up to 10 Million Euros, or, in the case of an undertaking, up to 2% of its entire global turnover of the preceding fiscal year, whichever is higher. The DPAs may also issue injunctive penalties, which include the ability to restrict international transfers, requiring the deletion of personal data, blocking the processing of data, etc. 

PDPB: Under the provisions of the PDBP, the data fiduciary will be liable to pay a penalty not exceeding ₹15 Crore, or 4% of its total worldwide turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher. Similar to GDPR, the PDBP also provides that the DPAs may issue injunctive penalties.

Analysis: The penalty provisions under both frameworks are similar. One distinction is that the PDPB permits data subjects to seek compensation from an administrative hearing, while under the GDPR, data subjects may bring claims in court for compensation and mechanisms by way of class action suits.

Conclusion

While the provisions of the PDBP seem to be adopted from the GDPR, there are significant differences that make the PDBP a unique framework. While the issues with the PDBP are likely to be corrected as the bill evolves, it would be interesting to see the implementation of the bill and see how different regulators manage to warrant compliance from different entities.

References

  1. General Data Protection Regulation – https://gdpr-info.eu/
  2. Personal Data Protection Regulation – https://prsindia.org/files/bills_acts/bills_parliament/2019/Personal%20Data%20Protection%20Bill,%202019.pdf
  3. Comparison: Indian Personal Data Protection Bill 2019 vs. GDPR by Covington & Burling LLP – https://www.privacysecurityacademy.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Comparison-Chart-GDPR-vs.-India-PDPB-2019-Jan.-16-2020.pdf
  4. Comparison: Indian Personal Data Protection Bill 2019 vs. GDPR by IAPP – https://iapp.org/media/pdf/resource_center/india_pdpb2019_vs_gdpr_iapp_chart.pdf

Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/lawyerscommunity

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Right to Vote

0

This article is written by Monesh Mehndiratta, a student of B.A. LL.B, Graphic Era Hill University, Dehradun. This article talks about one of the most important constitutional rights i.e. right to vote. It further explains the Universal Adult Franchise and gives in detail the intricacies involved with the right to vote and elections in the country. 

This article has been published by Sneha Mahawar.

Introduction

The Preamble of the Indian Constitution declares India as a “democratic republic” where the government works under the spirit of justice, liberty, equality and fraternity. The people have been given the right to vote to exercise the power by electing their representatives to the Parliament and State legislatures by way of a Universal Adult Franchise. The right to vote is one of the most important constitutional rights given to the citizens of India. It guarantees that people have a right to choose their representatives who will work for the welfare and benefit of the country. This right now has been recognised in most of the countries of the world. The article gives in detail the intricacies attached with the right along with the provisions and landmark judgements. 

History of the right to vote

The Right to vote is not a fundamental right but an important Constitutional right guaranteed to the citizens of this country. India, being the colony of Britain, was ruled by the East India Company or the British Empire with no rights given to the Indian citizens. The power to decide and the rule was solely vested with the East India Company. However, Morley Minto’s reforms due to Indian Councils Act, 1901 marked the beginning of changes in the legislative process. Few privileged people based on certain eligibility criteria like property, ownership, income and municipal tax were given the right to vote. 

The country witnessed the leap in voting rights after the enactment of the Government of India Act, 1919 in which dyarchy was introduced with the increase in the number of members in provincial legislative assemblies. Communal and class electorates were created by the Act which meant people had the right to vote with restrictions. Until 1919 women had no right to vote, it was for the first time that some women were given this right. The Simon Commission in 1927 recommended reducing the voting age to 21 years and some special representation for women voters and their right to contest elections. However, it was boycotted due to the lack of Indians in the commission. These recommendations were enacted in 1935 by which direct elections were introduced in the country. 

After the independence, when the constituent assembly was elected 15% of it had women representation. Sooner in 1947, the parliament imbibed the principle of universal adult franchise i.e. right to vote given to all irrespective of any discrimination based on sex, caste, creed, race or religion and each vote has one value. This principle has become the base for democracy and continues till the present. 

Universal Adult Franchise

The principle of the universal adult franchise means that all the citizens in the country have the right to vote without any discrimination based on sex, caste, creed, race or religion, the only exception is the age barrier. The term “franchise” has been derived from the french word “franc” which means free. In other words, it means people freely enjoying and exercising their right to choose their representative who will form the government of the country. This principle is enshrined under Article 326 of the Indian Constitution.  

Voters’ eligibility in the country

Any person who wants to be a registered voter in the country must fulfil the following conditions:

  • He must be a citizen of India 
  • Attained the age of 18 years i.e. he must be a major.
  • A person with a sound mind
  • Must not be barred by law or the courts.

According to voting rules:

  • One person can cast one vote
  • A Voter ID card, EPIC card or photo identity election card is the necessary document
  • A person can cast a vote only in the constituency where he resides

Types of elections:

  1. Central elections to the parliament 
  2. State legislative elections
  3. Elections at the local level
  4. District elections

How to vote

There are two ways by which a person can cast his/her vote:

  1. Polling booth: A person can easily cast a vote at a polling booth which also reduces the chances of fake and false votes as the person himself goes to vote. 
  2. Postal ballot: It means casting a vote through the post. This method is generally used for people in the armed forces, electoral officers on duty and any other such person who cannot reach the polling booth due to inevitable circumstances.  

Election Commission 

Article 324 of the Constitution deals with the appointment of an Election Commission which is an independent autonomous body, functioning without any interference from the executives. It ensures that all the elections are contested freely and fairly, regularly at certain intervals. The term of the commission is decided by the President. The appointment to the commission is done by the President of the country.

Composition

According to Article 324 of the Constitution, the Election Commission consists of:

  • Chief Election Commissioner who is the chairman of the commission
  • Other Election Commissioners 
  • The President may also appoint regional election commissioners if required.  

Removal

The Election Commissioners and Regional Commissioners can be removed on the advice and recommendation of the Chief Election Commissioner.

S.S. Dhannoa v. Union of India (1991)

Hon’ble Supreme Court in this case held that the election commissioners cannot be considered the same as Chief Election Commissioner for authority and powers. The Court rejected the petition of illegal removal from the post of election commissioner stating that it is “not a case of premature termination of service” and said that the protection given to the Chief Election Commissioner is not available to other commissioners and thus, the conditions of service vary and may have disadvantages as well. 

Process of contesting elections

  • Constituencies are marked
  • Electoral rolls are prepared
  • Registering political parties and candidates from each party
  • Campaigning 
  • The voting day where voters cast their vote

Powers and functions

  • It determines various electoral constituencies in the country as per The Delimitation Act, 2000
  • It prepares electoral rolls which are revised from time to time and registers the voters in the country. 
  • It schedules and finalizes the date of election and examines the nomination papers. 
  • It decides the location of the polling stations and other necessary arrangements in and around the location. 
  • It allocates symbols to political parties for their identification in the elections. 
  • Any dispute related to symbols or elections is firstly dealt with by the commission. 
  • Appoints various officers for the smooth conduct of elections. 
  • Issues voter ID card or EPIC card which is necessary for a registered voter.
  • Determines the code of conduct followed during election and campaigning by the political parties. 
  • It advises the President and governors in case of any disqualification of MP or MLA respectively. 
  • It has the power to cancel any poll due to violence, aggression and riots. 
  • Ensures free fair elections in the country without any discrepancy. 

T. N. Seshan v. Union of India (1995)

In this case, the constitutional validity of an Act passed regarding the powers and functions equating the election commissioner with CEC was challenged on the ground that it is inconsistent with Article 324 of the Constitution and that Section 10 of the said Act was unworkable. The court held that CEC does not enjoy any superior status but there lies a difference in service conditions of CEC and EC. Article 324 provides for a permanent body which is headed by a person necessary for the commission, namely CEC. The object of the article is to provide a multi-member body. 

Challenges faced by the Commission

  • Influence by monetary benefits.
  • The pressure of political parties
  • Electoral malpractices
  • Riots and violence 
  • No power to regulate inner-party democracy and finances of the party
  • EVM machines are being hacked
  • Unregistered voters
  • Malfunctioning
  • Officers getting corrupt
  • Interference by the executives. 
insolvency

Representation of the People Act, 1951

The various features of the Act are:

  • The Act regulates the conduct during elections. 
  • Provides adequate machinery needed during the election process.
  • Provides the procedure for the registration of political parties. 
  • Tells qualifications and disqualifications of the voters and people contesting elections.
  • Provisions to deal with malpractices. 
  • Section 62(5) of the Act provides that no person if he is a prisoner can cast a vote. It bars a person if he is confined or punished by the court of law. 

Voting rights 

The various voting rights granted to the voters by the Constitution are given below:

Right to know

It means that the citizens or the registered voters have the right to be informed about the candidates contesting elections. This makes them choose easily and wisely. It deals with information like assets and liabilities, financial status, criminal record if any, age etc about the candidate. This right forms part of Article19 of the constitution. 

NOTA

It means “none of the above” i.e. voters in India have been given the right not to vote for anybody from numerous candidates if they feel none of them is capable of being elected as their representative. They do participate in the elections but can choose the option of not voting for anyone. 

The Peoples Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India (2013)

The bench, in this case, gave the landmark judgment granting the right to reject to the citizens of the country in any elections. It asked the election commission to have the option “none of the above” or “right to negative vote” in Electronic Voting Machines (EVM) or the ballot papers used in the election process to cast a vote. It held that the people should be given a choice not to vote for any candidate if they feel none of them deserves to be voted for. 

Assistance to illiterate voters

The code of conduct by the Election Commission provides that if any voter is finding any difficulty while casting a vote or for traveling to the polling station due to physical disability or any reasonable problem and are not allowed to cast a vote through postal ballot, he/she may be assisted by the electoral officer present in the polling booth. 

Voting rights of NRI and prisoners

Until 2010, an NRI or a person not residing in the country was not allowed to vote but after an amendment, if such a person registers himself as a voter to the election commission then he can cast a vote even if he has been residing in the country for the last 6 months. However, this right for prisoners has been curtailed by Section 62(5) of the Representation of Peoples Act, 1951. 

Tendered votes

If any person who is a registered voter has not cast the vote but someone else had done it in his name then such a vote is called a tendered vote or a false vote. The person can cast a vote even if another person has done it in his name if he has any identity proof. The vote will be taken separately. However, all this is at the discretion of the election commission. It is one of the malpractices that prevails in the polling stations during elections. 

Conclusion

India being one of the largest democracies in the world, guarantees its citizens fundamental rights enshrined in Part III of the Constitution. The right to vote, though not a fundamental right, is an important constitutional right. It works on the principle of equality and freedom to choose. Thus, forming a basis for all the fundamental rights. We, the people in India have no direct control like “referendum” or “initiative” and so we exercise our sovereignty by way of electing our representatives who are responsible and accountable to us. The parliamentary democracy conceives representation of the people, responsible government and accountability of ministers. The accountability comes only when people have the power to remove those in power which is given by the right to vote. To ensure “justice” as given in the preamble of the Constitution, the universal adult franchise was adopted with the objective that every person in the country irrespective of any kind of discrimination will have the right to vote and choose his representative. Unfortunately, many people do not exercise this right seriously which causes faults in the system. 

References


Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/lawyerscommunity

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

SEC and beneficial ownership

0

This article is written by Shivangi Lal pursuing a Diploma in International Business Law. This article has been edited by Zigishu (Associate, Lawsikho) and Ojuswi (Associate Lawsikho). 

This article has been published by Sneha Mahawar.

Overview

SEC Form 3: what is it

In the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Form 3: Initial Statement of Beneficial Ownership of Securities, corporate insiders or substantial shareholders declare their beneficial ownership of securities.

It’s a big step toward regulating insider trading, which is when someone buys or sells a stock based on substantial nonpublic knowledge. Form 3 is used to reveal who these individuals are and to keep track of any questionable conduct.

What is a SBO – A significant beneficial owner

An Indian company’s “significant beneficial owner” is defined under the Companies Act, 2013, as amended (the “Companies Act”) and the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Rules, 2018, as amended (the “SBO Rules”) :

As Individuals or entities possessing one or more of the following “rights or entitlements” in the Company:

  1. 10% or more of the company’s shares, voting rights, or compulsorily convertible preference shares (compulsorily convertible debentures and global depository receipts are included in the term “shares”); 
  2. does have the right to obtain or take part in not less than 10% of the overall distributable dividend or other distribution in a financial year through indirect holdings alone, or together with any direct holdings; or
  3. has the right to exercise, or does exercise, considerable influence or control in ways other than via direct ownership.

According to the SBO ( significant beneficial owner) Rules, an individual is considered to have a ‘right or entitlement’ directly in the Company if the shares indicating such right or entitlement are held in the individual’s name; or (ii) the individual having or obtains equitable interest in the shareholdings and has made the necessary declarations to the Company under the Companies Act.

Money Laundering Prevention Act of 2002 – SBO

A “beneficial owner” is defined as an individual who ultimately owns or controls an individual who engages in a financial transaction or activity with a reporting entity (such as a bank, financial institution, intermediary, or a person carrying on a designated business or profession under the PML Act) or the representative of an entity under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, as amended (the “PML Act”). The term also applies to an individual who exercises ultimate effective control over a legal entity.

The Money Laundering Prevention (Record-Keeping) Rules, 2005, as amended (the “PML Rules”) define “control” as the right to appoint a majority of the board of directors or to direct management or policy choices, whether through ownership or management rights, shareholders agreements, or voting agreements.

In the US if stockholders control over 5% of the existing securities of a publicly traded company in the United States, beneficial ownership must be declared. Many states in the United States do not collect, verify, or update information on “beneficial ownership” of businesses since each state has its own set of laws. Additionally, the Customer Due Diligence Rules, which apply to banks and mutual funds, clarify and reinforce customer due diligence duties and assist in identifying beneficial ownership arrangements at the federal level.

According to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “SEC Act”), beneficial owners who own more than 5% of a U.S. company’s stock must meet certain other criteria to file Schedule 13D or 13G until their holdings drop below 5%. It was enacted to close a loophole in the securities act and to require disclosure when securities owners accumulated large blocks of equity securities of the same company through cash tender offers. The Williams Act (the Williams Act) amended the SEC Act to include section 13(d) in the SEC Act as a reaction to the growing use of cash tender offers for corporate takeovers.

Form 3 Disclosure is required by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The information on the form is intended to reveal the beneficial ownership of registered corporations by directors, officials, and beneficial owners. As a result, this information enters public record and may be inspected by anybody

Learn

A corporate insider or large shareholder must submit Form 3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission.The information given on the form becomes public record and is intended to reveal the holdings of directors, officials, and beneficial owners of registered corporations.After an insider gets linked with a corporation, the form must be submitted to the SEC within 10 days.

USA and SEC Form 3

After being associated with a corporation, the corporate insider must file Form 3 with the SEC within 10 days.

The following people are obliged to submit Form 3 according to the SEC :

Any director or officer of an issuer with a class of equity securities
A beneficial owner of greater than 10% of a class of equity securities
An officer, director, member of an advisory board, investment adviser, or affiliated person of an investment
An adviser or beneficial owner of more than 10% of any class of outstanding securities
A trust, trustee, beneficiary, or settlor required to report

Regardless as to whether or not an insider has an ownership holding in the business at the time, the form should be submitted for each firm in which an individual is an insider. The filer must provide their name, address, and connection to the reporting individual, as well as the security name and ticker symbol.

Related SEC Forms

Along with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Form 3 is linked to SEC Forms 4 and 5. (SEA). The Securities Exchange Act (SEA) was developed to regulate securities transactions on the secondary market after they were first issued, in order to provide better financial transparency and less fraud.

Form 4 is used to document changes in ownership. Although restricted transactional categories are exempt from this reporting obligation, these adjustments must be disclosed to the SEC within two business days. Any activities that should be initially reported on Form 4 or were qualified for delayed reporting must be reported on Form 3.

In August 2002, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced new regulations and changes to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act in compliance with the terms of Sarbanes-Oxley, which advanced the deadline for reporting numerous insider ownership reports. In addition to Forms 3, 4, and 5, the SEC has a number of additional relevant forms. Companies, for example, are required to submit Form 10-K, an annual report that includes a detailed review of their performance. A 10-K is usually divided into five sections:

Business: Details about the company’s primary operations, products, and services are included in this section.
Risk Factors: These are a list of any and all dangers that the firm is currently facing or may encounter in the future, usually in order of priority. Defaulting on debts is one example, as is the potential of additional rules impeding growth.
Selected Financial Data: For research analysts, this is one of the most crucial sections, since it details particular financial facts about the firm during the last five years.
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations by Management: MD&A stands for management discussion and analysis, and it refers to the qualitative information that goes along with the financial results. This allows the corporation to explain its financial results from the preceding fiscal year.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data: The company’s entire financial report statements, along with the income statement, balance sheets, and statement of cash flows, are included in this section.

What causes a Form 3 to be filed

When a person becomes an insider in a company, the Securities and Exchange Commission requires them to file a Form 3. The person’s ownership of the company’s securities must be disclosed. The goal of Form 3 is to prohibit insider trading. It provides strict standards on what defines an insider. 

What are the consequences of insider trading

Insider trading that is done unlawfully through the acquisition of substantial nonpublic information can result in civil or criminal penalties, such as fines and/or prison time.

Schedule 13D

The Schedule 13D is also known as the “beneficial ownership report” and is required when any owner acquires 5% or more of the voting shares in a company. The report must be filed within 10 days of reaching the 5% threshold. It provides the following information:

  • The acquirer’s name, address, and other background information
  • Type of relationship this owner has with the company
  • Whether the person has been convicted of a crime in the past five years
  • An explanation of why the transaction is taking place
  • The type and class of the security
  • The origin of funds used for purchases

Investors should care about Schedule 13D

As part of the Williams Act in 1968, Section 13D was added to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This provision was made in response to the growing use of tender offers in business takeovers. Schedule 13D was created to alert individual investors to anticipated changes in corporate control that might have an influence on the company’s future, as a consequence of corporate raiders consolidating voting power

Conclusion

In the Indian market, if an ownership requirement of less than 25% is used in the framework of the FDI Policy, together with a subjective test (e.g., pertaining to control), the number of instances requiring prior regulatory clearance under the 2020 FDI Amendment is anticipated to grow dramatically. While prior Indian media reports indicated that the government intended to speed up the FDI clearance process for instances resulting from the 2020 FDI Amendment, press sources in October 2020 indicate that the government may announce guidelines for beneficial ownership with no floor or threshold.In practise, the FDI clearance procedure under the present regime (where the sectoral ministry is the competent authority) has been more time-consuming than it was under the previous regime (which was repealed three years ago) and thus urgently needs to be simplified to eliminate inefficiencies. As a result, it is unclear whether the government would be able to adequately reconcile the execution of the 2020 FDI Amendment with the finance and other needs of Indian-incorporated firms.

References


Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/lawyerscommunity

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now
logo
FREE & ONLINE 3-Day Bootcamp (LIVE only) on

How Can Experienced Professionals Become Independent Directors

calender
28th, 29th Mar, 2026, 2 - 5pm (IST) &
30th Mar, 2026, 7 - 10pm (IST).
Bootcamp starting in
Days
HRS
MIN
SEC
Abhyuday AgarwalCOO & CO-Founder, LawSikho

Register now

Abhyuday AgarwalCOO & CO-Founder, LawSikho