Download Now
Home Blog Page 566

A checklist on legal issues for social media influencer’s marketing campaigns in accordance with Consumer Protection Guidelines 2020

0
Image Source: https://rb.gy/skxzot

This article is written by Shraileen Kaur, pursuing Diploma in Advanced Contract Drafting, Negotiation, and Dispute Resolution from LawSikho.

Introduction

There is no denial of the fact that the future of influencer marketing in India is scintillating. The Influencer Benchmark Report 2021 also stated that this industry is expected to grow to approximately 13.8 billion $ in 2021. Even various courts in India have stated that this one of the youngest forms of marketing is absolutely promising. With such a positive response from almost all the ends, there has been a tremendous increase in influencer marketing leading to the elevation of legal issues in this regard. 

An anonymous Instagram user bought an expensive detoxifying drink under the influence of his favorite Instagram model who claimed that it helped her to lose weight. On using the product, rather than losing weight she gained 8Kgs of weight and developed other health ailments. This is not just the story of this user but there are many such instances where consumers have become the victim of false claims by the influencers or ended up being misled by the advertisements which often happens in order to make the advertisement attractive. 

Also, it is not just the followers who are affected, there are influencers too who become victims of malpractices by the brands. Many influencers have raised the issue that they aren’t paid as promised. In this way, there are various legal issues arising from influencer marketing. 

Hence, the regulatory bodies and advertising watchdogs have unraveled the problem and started taking various steps to regulate and protect the interest of the consumers and industry members. 

Legal steps taken in India (for protecting interests of the consumers)

Consumer Protection Act, 2019

On 9 August 2019, the government of India came up with a successor to the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. As compared to the previous act, certain provisions were introduced in the act which focused on misleading advertisements and endorsements by celebrities (including social media influencers). Adding to it, this legislation also emphasizes marketing campaigns through influencers and targeted advertising. 

According to the provisions of the act, if there is an influencer who has not been informed that it is a paid promotion and he/she has intentionally lied about the product, followers can sue the influencer for such a misleading advertisement. If found guilty, the influencer will have to pay as compensation up to INR 10 lakh and repeated offenders can be fined up to INR 50 lakh.

The draft Central Consumer Protection Authority, 2020

After introducing the Consumer Protection Act 2019, the Government of India somewhere felt that just introducing laws concerning the protection of the interest of the consumer is not at all enough. Hence, the ministry of consumer affairs introduced a draft on the prevention of misleading advertisements unnecessary due diligence for endorsement of advertisements to keep a watch on all kinds of advertisements and advertisers irrespective of the medium being used.

With YouTube having approximately 265 million active users in India, it became a challenge for the concerned ministry to keep a tab on the interest of the consumers as various micro-influencers are marketing just for the sake of monetary benefits, ignoring the interest of the consumers. Hence, it has been made mandatory to conduct due diligence before any endorsement or advertisement of any product. 

The code for self-regulation of advertising

With the ultimate objective of protecting the interests of the consumers and achieving the acceptance of fair advertising practices, the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) has instituted the code for self-regulation. Rules and regulations have been set up concerning the authenticity of the advertising content under the code. Also, the ASCI is undertaking the formation of several disclosure rules for the social media influencers who are promoting the products on the internet. Various international guidelines are also taken into reference while framing these rules and regulations. 

Several guidelines as prescribed by the Ministry of Consumer Affairs (For protecting the interest of the influencers)

  1. Before taking the decision of endorsing a particular product, it is very important for the social media influencer to perform due diligence and check the quality, quantity, and authenticity of the product.
  2. For a product that affects the health of the public at large, it is advisable to check the claims being made and whether they are backed with scientific evidence or not. 
  3. In order to avoid legal liability, it is always advisable to mention if it is paid partnership or not. 
  4. While endorsing or advertising any product, it is advisable to put a disclaimer by the influencer with regard to a personal choice so that the consumer is well aware of the scenario and can do personal research before buying a product.
  5. It is advisable to have a written contract which the concerned brand and the contract should clarify all the rights and liabilities of both parties.
  6. Always ensure that the advertisement or endorsement does not violate any legal provisions and it’s not misleading in any way possible.

Significant case law

Marico Limited v. Abhijeet Bhansali

Bombay High Court had recently passed a landmark judgment in respect of a YouTube video titled, “Is Parachute Coconut Oil 100% Pure?”  by a Youtuber- Abhijeet Bhansali under the alias “Bearded Chokra”.

Background

In February 2019, Marico Limited represented by Khaitan and Co. filed a suit in Bombay High Court seeking interim reliefs against the concerned YouTube video on the grounds that the content of the video was false and misleading in nature and it also made unauthorized use of the plaintiff’s registered trademarks. 

Defendant argued that the video above represents his point of view as a consumer in good faith and is protected by his fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression. It is the defendant’s case that he is not a trader or a competitor of the plaintiff; The video is his attempt to educate customers about the quality of coconut oil and consumers have the right to exercise their judgment. He also sought to assert the Bonnard Principles, that the content of the video is based on research and documentation and that once he states the facts/justifications as a defense, no order is given out without a trial. 

Decision 

The court found that the respondent’s video was created and published without due diligence or research and that his statements in the video were recklessly made. The Court also found that the respondent intentionally distorted the facts and showed the same to the viewers. The court observed that at more than one point, it was clear that the respondent’s video contained several signs of malice. As the Court observed, the aforementioned video caused particular harm to the plaintiff as it appeared to have prevented some customers from purchasing the plaintiff’s products, as can be seen from the comments posted on the defendant’s video leading to financial loss to the complainant. The court ruled that the plaintiff had passed all the tests which are necessary to establish a case of property slander, malicious lying, and defamation. The court also denied the argument stated by the defendant’s representative that he is not the competitor of the plaintiff’s company and stated that it did not matter that the defendant was an individual and not a competitor. The court further ruled that the defendant’s video, under the guise of educating the public, primarily targets the plaintiff’s product and contains false information that discredits and disparages the said product. The video also illegally used the applicant’s trademarks in a manner that was prejudicial to its distinctiveness as well as reputation and was inconsistent with the honest practice in industrial or commercial matters. Regarding the argument for the right to free speech [Article 19 (a)], the Court held that this right is not absolute and cannot defend irresponsible claims. The court also ruled that the Bonnard principle (The pre-publication of any material that is defamatory cannot be censored in case the publisher is making fair comment in the public interest and bona fide intention) did not apply to the facts of the case because the defendant was unable to demonstrate in good faith and the comparison shown in the video was not proven on the document that was filed with the court. 

Hence, it was stated by the court that social media influencers have a powerful impact on the lives of viewers and people in general, and they have to ensure that what they post is not harmful or offensive. Therefore, the court ordered the defendant to remove the video from YouTube and any other platform on which it was posted. 

Conclusion

The above-listed steps were taken by the government of India and various regulatory bodies clearly indicate that they don’t want to leave any stone unturned to protect the interests of the consumers. The following legal framework not just imposes a penalty in case of default but responsibility and duty too. 

Ultimately, for the success of these laws prescribed by the government of India, both the parties i.e., Influencers and the advertisers will have to work upon the things together to adhere to the guidelines. Written agreements should be encouraged in order to avoid ambiguity and to narrow down the scope of legal implications. Agreements should be detailed enough to cover all the things with respect to the parties. 

Hence, it is vitally important for social media influencers and brands to ensure compliance with the above-mentioned rules and regulations in order to avoid any legal liability.

References


Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

The doctrinal issues faced by AI contracting

0
contract
Image source: https://rb.gy/nmq3cg

This article is written by Anushaka Sharma, pursuing Diploma in Advanced Contract Drafting, Negotiation, and Dispute Resolution from LawSikho.

Introduction

Artificial intelligence is an example of the fast-paced technology our world is witnessing. While there is no debate that technology has made our lives so much easier and efficient which reflects on the massive progress we have all made in our day-to-day lives. This has also been reflected in various booming industries like business and information technology. 

The legal industry which has not adopted innovative and recent trends when it comes to technological advancements can adopt this recent boom of Artificial intelligence and improve manifolds but this comes with its own set of doctrinal issues which are yet to be debated upon. In the below article, we will try to ponder upon Artificial intelligence-based contracting and the various issues it faces. 

The growing importance of artificial intelligence

Artificial intelligence can be rightly defined as “machines that respond to stimulation consistent with traditional responses from humans, given the human capacity for contemplation, judgment, and intention”. This thriving technology has been spreading its use wide in various areas of life and businesses. When it comes to businesses, the field of artificial intelligence has been booming. It is often reported that AI has often constituted a huge part of the revenue for various businesses. It’s not only the increased revenue that has been the reason for the boost in the use of artificial intelligence. The time saved by the use of this smart technology leads to better customer service and a great maintenance system through which businesses can identify the patterns which are not giving them enough profits or which might need a bit more attention. Owing to a plethora of such factors, a lot of up and coming industries are now adopting this fast-paced technology.

Artificial intelligence and the legal industry

The Indian legal scenario is very evidently not a very innovative industry. It has not adapted to the changing environment and has continued to hold on to the formative methods and procedures. But if we consider the change Artificial Intelligence can bring about in the legal industry, it can be immense. Starting from drastically reducing the manpower and the hours invested in legal research to predict the upcoming trends in a particular practice or litigation. An example of the above can be Lex Machina, which uses legal analytics to predict how judgments can proceed in the area of intellectual property law. Various legal startups like CaseMine, NearLaw, etc. are devising a feature called Natural Language Processing (NPL) to aid various firms and legal researchers to save much more time. Documentation work that is known to take months to complete can be made into a very simple process by the use of artificial intelligence which can complete them and make them ready to use within a couple of minutes. More than its time-saving quality, artificial intelligence will surely increase the quality of research and documentation by an increased accuracy rate, which is extremely essential in an industry like the legal industry.

Another important aspect of the legal industry where artificial intelligence has a lot of scope is the process of contract drafting. 

Contract drafting and artificial intelligence

Contract drafting, along with being an evergreen area of work, is also a cumbersome job to undertake. The level of accuracy, attention to detail, and research that a well-drafted contract demand is understandable but the same process can get taxing for a firm involved in the drafting of hundreds of such contracts. This is where artificial intelligence can step in and maintain the quality of every contract, irrespective of the number of contracts that need to be drafted.

Artificial intelligence can aid the contracting process in many ways;

  • Artificial intelligence can review the contracts for errors in language, contradictory clauses, or non-uniformity in writing, in less time and much more accurately. 
  • The mitigation of risks and identification of pitfalls in a contract can be performed in a better fashion by the use of artificial intelligence.
  • The law undergoes many variations and amendments. Often, due to a contract manager being unaware of these changes, can miss out on the non-compliant clauses in the contract. This risk can be steered clear of by the use of artificial intelligence which by using its own algorithm can identify and highlight the clauses which are non-compliant in nature. 

There are a multitude of ways by which artificial intelligence can prove to be a boon when it comes to the legal industry, especially contracting but as the saying goes, there are two sides to every coin. While this technology can make the process of contracting, effective and time-saving, there still remains a number of issues that need to be pondered upon and deliberated. 

Issues faced by artificial intelligence based contracting

More and more companies and firms might get attracted towards adopting the various advantages that artificial intelligence offers to give their company a higher ground but before making that decision, it’s necessary to ponder over some crucial issues that are associated with artificial intelligence based contracting.

  • Ability to contract

No matter how useful artificial intelligence and its various advantages prove to be, it cannot be completely used for contracting, simply owing to its inability to contract. Unlike companies, which are considered a separate legal entity in the eyes of law, Artificial intelligence cannot be given that separate entity status as per the recommendations from the high-level expert group of the European Commission, in their report titled “Policy and investment recommendations for trustworthy artificial intelligence“. Artificial intelligence cannot be held accountable due to its lack of property holdings and the lack of money to take up any form of liability. Moreover, it cannot be compared with the cognizance of the human mind when it comes to handling legal matters. 

  • Understanding the purpose of the contract

The purpose clause of a contract is considered to be one of the most important clauses of the contract as it sets the foundation for the discussions that advance and the terms of the contract that are decided. A contract needs to be drafted extremely well to devise an accurate purpose clause that suits one’s client. As mentioned above, the cognizance of a human mind is unmatched as compared to artificial intelligence and thus the way that a human can understand the client’s intention to enter a contract seems like a safer option as compared to completely relying on artificial intelligence to discover the real intention of a client. This can often lead to disappointment and huge damages for one or the other party to a contract. 

  • The mirage of responsibility

The accuracy and the efficiency of artificial intelligence are often praised by many legal practitioners but what looks lucrative on the surface boils down to sheer normalcy when the aspect of liberty is discussed in detail. The liability in the case of artificial intelligence based contracting can either be product liability wherein the programmers who constructed the algorithm of artificial intelligence or strict liability where the users are held accountable for any such mistake since they are the ones who avail the benefits of the technology.

  • Struggle for the courts of law

Law and justice go hand in hand. Artificial intelligence based contracting can often lead to disputes owing to the above issues mentioned in this article. To solve these disputes and give the wronged party justice, it’s imperative for the courts of law to be comfortable and aware of the various changes that will come in with artificial intelligence based contracting. There is a high chance that a shift to artificial intelligence based contracting can leave a lot of judges and judiciary members feeling unaware and not completely updated with the new norms and laws associated with the collaboration of law and technology. 

  • Need for regular updates

Being a technology-based practice, artificial intelligence contracting can require regular updates as per the law and technology guidelines. These regular changes in the database can create a risk of losing some very important data which can disrupt a lot of contracts and cause damages to some parties. Further, technology comes with its own set of risks in the form of viruses and hackings which can subject information of great importance to a risk of being leaked and misused.

The conundrum 

The problems and issues faced when it comes to artificial intelligence based contracting to need a lot of deliberations and discussions to eliminate the pitfalls and make the collaboration between legal contracting and artificial intelligence more efficient. 

On the surface, seeing the issues in general, it might appear that discussing more on the issue of granting artificial intelligence a limited legal personality status might untangle the issues but the conundrum of liability still stays as even then if there is an error caused by the artificial intelligence technology, the accountability will still most probably fall on the programmers.


Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Cybercrime against women and children : escalation of cybercrime during pandemic and laws to curb it

0
Cybercrime

This article is written by Aditi Shrivastava, pursuing Diploma in Cyber Law, FinTech Regulations, and Technology Contracts from LawSikho.

Table of Contents

Introduction

The pandemic has been a difficult time for everyone around the globe. People faced various problems from lack of healthcare facilities, lockdown frustration, and isolation, losing jobs and business income, to losing their loved ones to this deadly virus. The COVID-19 virus has been proved to be a disaster causing innumerable deaths, mental, physical, and emotional agony to millions of people around the globe. The pandemic has not only taken away the lives of millions of people but has been a period of distress for many people who lost their jobs or had to shut down their businesses due to lockdown, for people who lost the only person who was capable of earning in the family, for children who lost both of their parents at such a fragile age, and many more.

But it is not limited to that! While people were struggling and fighting the pandemic, there was another atrocity spreading like virus i.e., the crime using the internet and mobile. Meanwhile, when people were using the internet and mobile to keep themselves distracted and busy during the pandemic, some people were taking out their lockdown frustration by misusing these resources and harassing people. The cybercrimes using the internet and mobile phones were gaining hype and were escalating during the pandemic. 

What are the causes and reasons for the escalation of cybercrimes during the pandemic? Who were the easy targets of cybercrime during the pandemic? What kind of cybercrimes were more frequently committed in the last year? What are the current laws to deal with these crimes? This article answers these questions and many other questions revolving around the issue of cybercrime during the pandemic.

Easy targets of cybercrime during the pandemic

Cybercrime against women during the pandemic

While men and adults were also scum to various cybercrimes, women, and children, being one of the most vulnerable parts of society, became the easy targets of cybercrime offenders during the pandemic. Women, especially housewives and who are prone to social media users have been exposed to such crimes during the pandemic. Women have also been the victims of domestic violence and abuse during the period of lockdown. 

According to the reports of the National Commission for Women, the number of cybercrimes against women rapidly increases during the period of lockdown and decreases afterward. The same can be shown by the tables given below:

Month

Number of Cybercrime cases against Women

The situation of pandemic and lockdown in India

March

37

No Lockdown; Pre-pandemic. 

April

55

Lockdown imposed; Pandemic started to grow in India.

May

73

Lockdown continued; the Pandemic was at its peak.

June

103

Lockdown restrictions were decreased; the Pandemic was at its peak.

July

110

Lockdown lifted; Pandemic continued with a small decrease in the number of cases.

August

68

No lockdown restrictions; the Pandemic was gradually decreasing.

September

59

No lockdown restrictions; the Pandemic was gradually decreasing.

October

48

No lockdown restrictions; the Pandemic was gradually decreasing.

As we can see, in 2020, the number of cybercrime cases against women rapidly increased in April and continued to grow in May, June, and July when India was badly affected by covid-19, the pandemic was at its peak and the entire nation was under lockdown. Eventually, when the pandemic started to decline and lockdown restrictions started to decrease in August, the number of cybercrime cases also started to decline and further declined in September and October when lockdown restrictions were lifted.

Month

Number of Cybercrime cases against Women

The situation of the second wave of pandemic and lockdown in India

February

42

No Lockdown; No sign of the second wave of Covid-19.

March

75

No Lockdown; the Second wave of covid-19 started to approach.

April

78

The state-wise lockdown was imposed in several Indian states; the Pandemic started to grow rapidly.

May

98

Lockdown continued; the Pandemic was at its peak.

June

78

Lockdown restrictions were decreased; the Pandemic was gradually decreasing.

July

67

Lockdown lifted; Pandemic was gradually decreasing.

As we can see, in 2021, the number of cybercrime cases against women rapidly increased in March and continued to grow in April and May when India was badly affected by the second wave of covid-19 and almost the entire nation was facing strict lockdown restrictions. Eventually, when the second wave of pandemics started to decline and lockdown restrictions started to decrease in June, the number of cybercrime cases also started to decline and further declined in July when lockdown restrictions were lifted.

  • Cybercrime cases against women in previous years

Year

Number of Cybercrime cases against Women

2021 (till July)

504

2020

704

2019

459

2018

375

2017

370

2016

311

2015

223

2014

209

A total number of 704 cybercrime cases against women were registered in 2020 i.e. when the pandemic started and 504 cybercrimes cases against women have already been registered in 2021 and we are only halfway through the year. The number of cybercrime cases against women was comparatively less in the previous years and significantly increased during the pandemic and lockdown.

Cybercrime against children during the pandemic

Children, especially those who have been either abandoned due to the loss of both of their parents to the COVID-19 virus or who have been temporarily separated from their parents because either of them has caught the disease have been the most vulnerable and easy targets to these cybercrimes. Where the parents are hospitalized and children are kept under other’s care or are uncared for, such children are more prone to cyber abuse because there is no one to look after their online activities. Children have been spending more time on virtual platforms due to the closing of schools amid the COVID-19 pandemic which has exposed them to the risk of online harassment and cyberbullying. During the lockdown and due to the closure of the schools, parents had to rely on technology and digital solutions to keep their children learning, entertained, and connected to the outside world. Children are spending more time online for various entertainment, social and educational purposes. But all children do not have the necessary knowledge and resources to keep themselves safe and secure in the online world. 

The CHILDLINE 1098 helpline number, an emergency service number for women and children to help them in cases of abuse and violence, received more than 92,000 calls in the second week of lockdown in India in April 2020. The number of calls of children in distress and fear increased by 50 percent in just 11 days from March 25th, 2020. The Supreme Court of India took suo moto cognizance of the matter to eliminate the risk of abuse and violence against children during the pandemic.

Children are more vulnerable when they are kept away from their parents or when there is no one to look after them. The pandemic has made the situation even more vulnerable for children because they are helplessly exposed to the online world for their educational purposes. Most of the children, especially those belonging to Grade 1 to Grade 5, are very less acquainted with technology and internet use, and ethics. Therefore, it becomes very easy for sexual predators and other cybercrime offenders to hack the devices of these children and manipulate them. A child does not know whether the particular website is safe to visit or not, or whether a particular image/video should be downloaded or not and hence, gets easily manipulated to indulge in immoral activities and become easy targets of the cybercrime offenders.

Most frequently committed cybercrimes during the pandemic

Cybercrimes against women

During the pandemic and lockdown, people had to switch to the internet world for educational, entertainment, occupational, and social purposes. Working women started to work from home with the use of laptops, mobile phones, and the internet. Women who are still completing their education had to switch to the internet for virtual classes and other educational purposes. As most of the women were engaged on social media websites and on one or the other online platforms to carry out their educational, occupational, and entertainment purposes, the rate of cybercrimes against women started to increase during this period. As the entire nation was under strict lockdown, it became difficult for the offenders to make a physical attack on the victim, and therefore, they began to mentally and emotionally harass people. The most common cybercrimes that women encountered last year are as follows: 

  • Cyberstalking

It included connecting or trying to connect with the victim on social media or phone calls despite clear indication of disinterest from her end, posting messages (sometimes threatening) on the profile of the victim, constantly bombarding the victim with emails/text messages/phone calls, etc. 

  • Sextortion

This is the most common cybercrime committed against women during the period of the pandemic. The offenders started extorting money or sexual favors by blackmailing the victims to reveal their private pictures or morphed images. The pandemic and lockdown frustration made the offenders seek sexual video calls/images or messages from women by threatening them. Also, loss of income encouraged them to extort money by threatening the victim with their morphed images.

  • Cyber hacking

During the lockdown, people started to read news online. There was a rise in cases of fake news and information. The women started becoming the victim of cyber hacking by clicking on malware links which get all their information available on phone, turns on the camera and microphone, and captures their intimate pictures and videos. Offenders, in turn, use these pieces of information and pictures for sextortion and other favors.

  • Cyberbullying

This included publishing defamatory and abusive statements against the victim on social media platforms and demanding money for deleting them, insensitive comments on the posts of the victim, exchanging morphed images/private images of the victim without her consent, sending rape threats to the victim, etc. 

  • Phishing

To make money in lockdown, offenders are sending fake emails with a link to a particular webpage to induce the victim to unwittingly enter personal data like bank account details, contact details, and passwords or with the intention to install harmful viruses in the victim’s device as soon as they open the link. These emails and messages appear to have come from legitimate sources. The offenders then make fraudulent transactions from the victim’s account to their account with the use of the bank account and other personal details of the victim.

  • Sexually abusive and pornographic content

During the pandemic, offenders were also indulged in sexual abuse of women on the internet, morphing the picture of the victim and using it for the purpose of pornography.

  • Cybersex trafficking

Unlike sex trafficking, the victim does not come in direct contact with the abuser. In cybersex trafficking, the dealer live-streams, films, or photos of the victim performing sexual/intimate acts from a central location and sells the material online to sexual predators and buyers. The offenders have been sexually abusing women by making them a part of cybersex trafficking byways of coercion, manipulation, and blackmailing.

Cybercrime against children

While children were engaged on the internet and virtual platform for their educational purposes, they were unaware of its dark side. The parents, teachers, and children had to helplessly rely on these virtual platforms for fulfilling the educational needs of the children but at the same time, children were being exposed to cybercrime offenders being the easy targets to manipulate and harass. Some of the most common cybercrimes committed against children during the pandemic while they were engaged in educational and entertainment activities are as follows:

  • Sexual abuse of children

This includes child sexual abuse materials such as child pornographic images and videos, online sexual exploitation of children over phone call/video call where children are coerced into performing sexual acts. 

  • Pornographic/sexually explicit content for children

While using the internet for education and entertainment purposes or going through a social media page, children are being induced to open certain websites which direct them to sexually explicit content and pornographic videos/images. This corrupts the mentality of the child but the offender gets views and money. 

  • Cybersex trafficking

Unlike sex trafficking, the victim does not come in direct contact with the abuser. In cybersex trafficking, the dealer live-streams, films, or photos of the victim performing sexual/intimate acts from a central location and sells the material online to sexual predators and buyers. The offenders have been sexually abusing children by making them a part of cybersex trafficking byways of manipulation and coercion.

  • Cyberbullying

This includes harsh, mean, abusive, or cruel comments and messages against the child victim. Children are easy to bully because of their innocent nature and it becomes even much easier for the offenders to bully children on virtual platforms. Cyberbullying causes; avoiding school classes via virtual platforms, suddenly wanting to stop using the internet and computer devices, being secretive about their digital life, distress, and emotional instability among children.

  • Child grooming

The offender befriends the child victim by forming an emotional and fiduciary bond with him/her with the objective of sexual abuse of the child. The children tend to trust easily and hence, it becomes very much easy for the offenders to create such a bond with them. Once the bond is created, the offender starts manipulating the child to perform sexual acts. Child grooming via online platforms and social media has been one of the most committed cybercrimes during the pandemic. Child groomers were able to operate and gain children’s trust online and it became easy for them to do so because of the unawareness of children and parents about the dark side of the internet world. 

Above mentioned are some of the infamous cyber crimes committed against children during the pandemic. The children and parents of such children have been becoming victims of such crimes. This tells us about the need to educate children as well as parents about the cyber world and how they can protect themselves from cybercrime offenders.

Indian laws for cyber crimes committed during the pandemic

The existing legal framework concerning the cybercrimes committed against women and children during the pandemic includes:

Cybercrime complaint registration

The victim of cybercrime can register the complaint by any of the following methods: 

  1. Online Cyber Crime complaint (National Cybercrime Reporting Portal),
  2. Offline Cyber Crime complaint (Cyber Crime Cell),
  3. FIR (Local Police station).

However, during the time of the pandemic, the most feasible and recommended method to register a cybercrime complaint is the online method via National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal. Through this method, the victim can register the complaint of the crime committed against her at the ease of sitting at her home. The victim will not have to visit any police station or cybercrime cell for the formalities or submitting the evidence. The relevant evidence can also be uploaded on the Cybercrime Portal at the time of registering the complaint. Moreover, the victim will have the option of tracking the status of her complaint with the help of her registered mobile number. Cybercrime offenses against women and children such as Child Pornography, Child Sexual Abuse Material containing sexually explicit images/videos of children, sexually explicit content such as rape/gang rape, etc. can be registered by the victim/complainant on the Cybercrime portal. The victim doesn’t need to register the complaint, any person on behalf of the victim can also register the complaint on Cybercrime Portal. Also, the victim/complainant can register the complaint anonymously i.e., the identity of the victim/complainant will not be revealed under this option. To track the status of the complaint in the future, the victim/complainant shall choose the option of “Report and Track” under which he/she will have to register with the mobile number and email ID. Under this option, the victim/complainant will receive a timely update of all the investigations and actions taken by the police officer concerning the complaint registered.

Another option that is available to the victim for the registration of the cybercrime complaint is the offline method i.e., the victim can make a written complaint to the nearest cybercrime cell and such written complaint shall be addressed to the Head of the respective cybercrime cell. The complaint application shall be accompanied by the name, contact details, mailing address, and other relevant documents/evidence of the victim/complainant.

In case, the victim/complainant does not have access to any of the cybercrime cells in India or internet services or devices, he/she can file an FIR at a local police station with all the relevant information and evidence. 

Information Technology Act, 2000

  • Section 66E: Punishment for violation of privacy

This section punishes the offender who intentionally or knowingly captures, publishes, or transmits the image of a private area of any person or a person engaged in private activities without the consent of such person.

Punishment: Imprisonment which may extend to 3 years or fine which may extend to two lakh rupees, or with both.

  • Section 67: Punishment for publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic form

This section punishes the cybercrime offender who publishes or transmits in the electronic form, any material which;

  1. Is lascivious (capable of arousing sexual desire), or
  2. It tends to deprave and corrupt the persons who are likely to read, see or hear the matter contained in it.

Punishment: First conviction- Imprisonment which may extend to 3 years and fine which may extend to 5 lakh rupees.

Second/subsequent conviction- Imprisonment which may extend to 5 years and fine which may extend to 10 lakh rupees.

  • Section 67A: Punishment for publishing or transmitting of material containing the sexually explicit act, etc. in electronic form

This section punishes the offender who publishes/ causes to publish or transmits/causes to transmit in electronic form any material which contains sexually explicit act or conduct.

Punishment: First conviction- Imprisonment which may extend to 5 years and fine which may extend to 10 lakh rupees.

Second/subsequent conviction- Imprisonment which may extend to 7 years and fine which may extend to 10 lakh rupees.

  • Section 67B: Punishment for publishing or transmitting of material depicting children in the sexually explicit act, etc. in electronic form

This section punishes the offender who publishes/causes to publish, or transmits/causes to transmit, or creates text or digital images, collects, seeks, browses, downloads, advertise, promotes, exchanges, or distributes any material, in electronic form which depicts children engaged in a sexually explicit act or conduct. It also punishes the offender who cultivates, entices, or induces children to online relationships with one or more children for a sexually explicit act, or who facilitates online abusing of children, or who records in any electronic form abuse or sexually explicit act with children.

Punishment: First conviction- Imprisonment which may extend to 5 years and fine which may extend to 10 lakh rupees.

Second/subsequent conviction- Imprisonment which may extend to 7 years and fine which may extend to 10 lakh rupees.

Indian Penal Code, 1860

  • Section 354A: Sexual harassment and punishment for sexual harassment

This section punishes the offender who commits any of the following acts-

  1. Physical contact and advances involving unwelcome and explicit sexual overtures; 
  2. A demand or request of sexual favors; or
  3. Showing pornography against the will of the woman; or
  4. Making sexually colored remarks.

Any of the above-mentioned acts if committed with the use of the internet, computer device, or computer network, amounts to cybercrime and is punishable under this section.

Punishment: Imprisonment which may extend to 3 years, or fine, or with both.

  • Section 354C: Voyeurism

This section punishes the offender who watches or captures the image of a woman engaging in a private act when she believes and expects not to be watched or observed by the perpetrator or any other person.

Punishment: First conviction- Imprisonment which shall not be less than one year, but which may extend to 3 years and fine.

Second/subsequent conviction- Imprisonment which shall not be less than 3 years, but which may extend to 7 years and fine.

  • Section 354D: Stalking

This section punishes the offender who-

  1. Follows a woman and contacts/attempts to contact such woman with the intention to establish a personal interaction despite clear indication of disinterest by such woman; or
  2. Monitors the use by a woman of the internet, email, or any other form of electronic communication.

Punishment: First conviction- Imprisonment which may extend to 3 years and fine.

Second/subsequent conviction- Imprisonment which may extend to 5 years and fine.

  • Section 503: Criminal intimidation

This section punishes the offender who threatens another with any injury to his person, reputation, or property with the intent to cause alarm to that person or to cause that person to do any act which he/she is not legally bound to do or to omit to do any act which that person is legally entitled to do. 

Punishment under Section 506: Imprisonment which may extend to 2 years, or with fine, or with both. Punishment for criminal intimidation by imputing unchastity to a woman: Imprisonment which may extend to 7 years, or with fine, or with both.

  • Section 509: Word, gesture, or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman

This section punishes the offender who, intending to insult the modesty of a woman, utters any words, makes any sounds or gesture, or exhibits any object, or intrudes upon the privacy of such woman.

Punishment: Imprisonment which may extend to 3 years and fine.

The Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986

  • Section 4: Prohibition of publication or sending by post of books, pamphlets, etc., containing indecent representation of women

This section prohibits the production, sale, letting to hire, distribute, or circulation by post any book, pamphlet, paper, slide, film, writing, drawing, painting, photograph, representation, or figure which contains indecent representation of women in any form. 

Punishment under Section 5: First conviction: Imprisonment which may extend to 3 years and fine which shall not be less than fifty thousand rupees, but which may extend to one lakh rupees.

Second/subsequent conviction: Imprisonment which shall not be less than 2 years, but which may extend to 7 years and fine which shall not be less than one lakh rupees, but which may extend to five lakh rupees. 

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012

  • Section 11: Sexual harassment of child and punishment therefore

Under this section, the sexual harassment of children has been defined. Sexual harassment of a child is said to be committed when the offender-

  1. Utters any words, makes any sounds or gesture or exhibits any object or part of the body with the intention harass such child; or
  2. Makes a child exhibit his body or any part of his body so as it is seen by such offender or any other person; or
  3. Shows any object to a child in any form or media for pornographic purposes; or 
  4. Repeatedly or constantly follows/watches/contacts a child either directly or through electronic, digital, or any other means; or 
  5. Threatens to use, in any form of media, a real or fabricated depiction through electronic, film or digital or any other mode, of any part of the body of the child or the involvement of the child in a sexual act; or
  6. Entices a child for pornographic purposes or gives gratification.

Punishment for sexual harassment of a child under Section 12: Imprisonment which may extend to three years and fine.

  • Section 13: Using child for pornographic purposes and punishment therefore

Under this section, the offender who uses a child for sexual gratification, in any form of media (including Advertisement or Programme telecast by TV channels or internet or any other electronic/printed form), shall be guilty of the offense of using the child for pornographic purposes. The use of a child for sexual gratification includes-

  1. Representation of sexual organs of a child;
  2. Using a child engaged in real or simulated sexual acts (with/without penetration);
  3. The indecent or obscene representation of a child.

Punishment under Section 14: First conviction- Imprisonment which may extend to 5 years and fine. Second/subsequent conviction- Imprisonment which may extend to 7 years and fine.

Conclusion

During the period of the pandemic, many women and children have become the victim of various cybercrimes. The rate of cybercrime increased unbelievably during the lockdown in India. A total number of 704 cyber crimes against women were registered in 2020 and 504 in 2021 (till July). The data provided above is evidence of the fact that the lockdown and pandemic frustration made the offenders commit such crimes aggressively. The most common cybercrimes committed against women during the pandemic are Cyber Stalking, Sextortion, Cyber Hacking, Cyber Bullying, Sexual Abuse (including sexually explicit and pornographic content against the victim), Cybersex Trafficking, and Phishing. The most common cybercrimes committed against children during the pandemic are Sexual Abuse of Children, Cybersex Trafficking, Cyber Bullying, Child Grooming, etc. Women and children are the most vulnerable parts of society and hence, became easy targets of cybercrime offenders and sexual predators during the lockdown.

To fight these cybercrimes committed against women and children, the Indian legal system provides various laws. The first and the foremost step of a victim should be to register the cybercrime complaint in the nearest cybercrime cell or on the National Cybercrime Reporting portal, or in case of no access to any of these platforms the victim can register an FIR in the local police station. The provisions of Information Technology Act, 2000, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986, and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 prohibits the above-mentioned cybercrimes against women and children and also punishes the offender with strict punishments of imprisonment and fine.


Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Rights of traditional forest dwellers : a socio-legal study

0
Image source - https://bit.ly/3lX4I37

This article is written by Pranav Sethi, from SVKM NMIMS School of law, Navi Mumbai. This article deals with the rights of the traditional forest dwellers – a social-legal study.

Introduction 

In India, the connection among tribal groups and forests was defined by coexistence, and these populations were seen as essential to the natural system’s survival and sustenance. This mutualistic interdependence was recognized, and customary rights over natural forests were established. However, during the colonial era and in Indian independence, the administration did not acknowledge or register these rights when combining state forests. Tribal groups were evicted from their traditional forest resources as a consequence of the ensuing uncertainty of tenancy and danger of eviction. The Wildlife (Protection) Act of 1972 (the ‘WPA’) and the Forest Conservation Act of 1980 (the ‘FCA’) continued this historical injustice by identifying protection of the environment and indigenous rights acknowledgment as fundamentally contradictory goals. Other post-independence legislative and executive policies have only served to exacerbate these divisions.

The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act of 2006, furthermore recognized as the Forest Rights Act, 2006, the Tribal Rights Act, 2006, the Tribal Bill, and the Tribal Land Act, is a groundbreaking piece of legislation that governs and protects the rights under the law of forest-dwelling communities, especially the indigenous Adivasi tribal community, over land and natural resources. Even after the independence of the country, it was discovered that perhaps the forests were entrusted to the political wants of a few public officials with too much power.

Relevance of Bhuria Committee

Concerning the consequent tribal protests and turmoil, the Ministry of Rural Development of the Government of India formed a committee led by Mr. Dileep Singh Bhuria, a tribal Member of Parliament, to make recommendations on the important features of the law for broadening the provisions of Part IXA of the Constitution of India (‘Panchayats’) to Scheduled Areas (which are primarily tribal areas identified for special protection in the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution). The Bhuria Committee’s report, published in 1995, urged, among other things, for the legal status of the Gram Sabha (or village council, which consists of the gathering among all adult citizens of a village) as the principal focus of tribal administration. It was also suggested that the long-standing demands for tribal autonomy over valuable forestland be granted, and also that official involvement in tribal matters be avoided. After the announcement of this, Parliament approved the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (the “PESA”), which acknowledged tribals’ right to self-governance, but the PESA’s administration has been far from adequate.

Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006

The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act 2006 (the ‘Act’) was adopted by Parliament in 2006 to ‘undo the past injustices’ endured by indigenous people. As unexpectedly, substantial conversation and argument accompanied the legislation’s passage, highlighting the differences between social activists and environmentalists and conservationists on key subjects. As a result, it’s critical to explore the causes for the Act’s development in the presence of such division.

We must also look at the Act’s measures to see if it has accomplished in finding a balance between livelihood stability and environmental objectives. Unfortunately, based on an assessment of the law and supplementary research, the Act’s prospective reach and influence have been restricted.

How are the environmental situation in the forests

The people of the forests have been subjected to discrimination, arrests, and other forms of retaliation as a result of the continuance of deforested circumstances and anti-forest laws, which hold people responsible for encroachment on their lands. Local communities had to take the burden of the administrative burden as well. Sexual assault, torture, extortion for money, bonded labor, and human trafficking were all widespread (and still are to a certain level). More than 3 lakh families, mostly from indigenous tribal populations, were expelled and made homeless as a result of the evictions campaign, which began in 2002. Many communities in and nearby woodlands were demolished in various locations. In a sense, there was a legally authorized criminalization of large indigenous populations, which is completely contrary to the Constitution’s spirit and ethics.

What is the purpose of the Forest Rights Act

The following are the major goals that this statute is supposed to achieve:

  1. The acknowledgment of the protections of traditional groups residing in forest regions who have been denied their primary constitutional rights due to the punitive restrictions of the British forest acts since time immemorial.
  2. The Act also intends to move away from excessive government control of ecosystems, which had previously been maintained out of the scope of public debate and deliberation The tribal identity is democratized and respected as a result of this.
  3. The Act defines rules for developing rural improvement infrastructure in and near forested regions.
  4. Another key feature of the Act is the development of disadvantaged individuals to reduce poverty and enhance the economic prosperity of poor households.
  5. The goal is also to strengthen and encourage regional self-governance amongst native tribes and forest inhabitants who are disadvantaged.
  6. Cultural heritage and intellectual property protection relating to the cultural variety and biodiversity of forest dwellers are being preserved.

Who qualifies as a forest dweller under the same rule

It is necessary to be recognized as a “forest dweller” in an attempt to benefit from the Act’s protections and entitlements. For the criteria to be determined, there are two important elements. The first level consists of conditions that must be met to be eligible as a forest inhabitant. These are the ones that will be explored later down:

  • The individual(s) must live in or near forests or forest grounds.
  • The individual must be genuinely reliant on the forest, its land, and its services for their existence.

The second step entails demonstrating the aforementioned:

According to Section 2(o) of the Act, the aforementioned stage 1 standards must be met for seventy-five years to be classified as an ‘Other Traditional Forest Dweller’.

The Act also provides for two other options. The following are some of them:

  1. Section 2(c) of the Act, which states that the individual is a Scheduled tribe member.
  2. According to Section 4(1) of the Act, the person is a resident of an area where they are designated.

Tribal rights in the organization : a move towards more modernization

The traditional approach of the state apparatus to the suffering of indigenous groups has been one of ignorance and distrust. However, for the first time in 1988, the e-linkages among environmental and social problems in the form of human rights to natural resources were acknowledged, and the National Forest Policy (the “NFP”) emphasized the importance of including tribal communities in forest governance.

To achieve this stated purpose the Ministry of Environment and Forests (the “MoEF”) issued a set of six circulars on September 18, 1990, stating that pre-1980 forest land occupation would be qualified for regularisation if the State Government developed specific eligibility requirements based on the local necessities and requirements. Tragically, this people-centered approach was never put into practice.

Misinterpretation of Supreme Court’s order by Ministry of Environment and Forests

The Ministry of Environment and Forests, on the other hand, misconstrued the Supreme Court’s ruling, which demanded the Court’s approval for any generalization of forest encroachments, as a directive to evict “all illegal encroachment of forestlands in different States/Union Territories.” As a measure, the forest department launched nationwide eviction operations. During large demonstrations by tribal communities after the May 2004 general elections, the UPA (United Progressive Alliance) government pledged to end the “eviction of tribal groups and other forest-dwelling populations from forest regions” in its Common Minimum Program.

Role of Ministry of Tribal Affairs

The Ministry of Tribal Affairs (MoTA) was tasked with creating the legislation and formed a Technical Advisory Group composed of experts from other ministries, civil society, and constitutional lawyers to prepare the Scheduled Tribes (Recognition of Forest Rights) Bill, 2005. Numerous aspects of the Bill were received with fierce resistance from a variety of sources. Wildlife conservationists and the Ministry of the Environment have expressed alarm about the alleged negative impact of its administration, which, they say, might severely harm the already scarce forest covering. The validity of these charges was contested by the pro-Bill group, which saw the legislation as a way to correct a “historical injustice” that originated in the non-recognition of tribal people’s forest rights during forest concentration. There was a similar division among supporters of tribal land rights and supporters of the forest departments’ continued ownership of lands.

Kinds of rights granted to forest dwellers

There are three types of rights reflected in the Scheduled Tribes and Other Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006. These are explored in more detail below under several topics.

Rights granted for the usage of forest resources

The relevant rights to use and/or collect have been specified by the Act:

  1. Section 3(1)(c) gives people the right to use minor, “traditionally” obtained natural resources such as tendu patta, herbs, and herbal medicines. Nevertheless, timber was left off the list since it would have permitted widespread deforestation.
  2. Section 3 also includes sites that forest residents can use, such as grazing areas and water bodies.
  3. The Act makes special provisions for the areas of traditionally nomadic or pastoral nomads groups who do not practice an established agriculture system and shift their herds to distinct destinations.

Right to protection and conservation

  1. Only the officials of the forest department had a legal inherent responsibility to safeguard the forests before the establishment of this legal framework. This gave these authorities a lot of exceptional privileges, allowing them to demolish or pass off land or territory as per their needs and demands.
  2. Section 5 of the Act grants privileges to various forest-dwelling societies to protect their environment, wildlife, and other resources.
  3. With frequent threats and risks including forest mafia groups, corporate elites or manufacturers, land opportunists, and others, the majority among whom act following and with the Forest Department’s assistance.
  4. All of this was considered authorized work, and preventing employees from providing these services was illegal under earlier rules.
  5. Following the enactment of the present Forest Rights Act, the community was given rights to maintain and manage the forest.
  6. The Act’s Section 3(1)(i) gives the community woods the right and power to be conserved and protected.

Land rights

  1. A minimum of 4 hectares of land can be sought under Section 3(1)(a) interpreted with Section 4(6) if the land has been harvested by them for their livelihoods but the documentation is not obtainable to the claimant.
  2. If the plaintiff’s estate has been illegally taken by the Forest Department or is the focus of a Forest-Revenue Department disputes, he or she might legally claim such land rights by presenting a patta or a government lease, according to Section 3(1)(f) and 3(1)(g).
  3. The timeframe has been announced in Section 4(3) of the Act for evaluating whether rights to land that have not been harvested pre and post-December 31, 2005 are still valid.
  4. Section 4(4) of the Act protects the land in a way that prevents it from being sold or transferred to anybody other than heirs.

Mechanisms in place to ensure that rights are respected

Section 6 of the Act, in addition to establishing a complex set of rules and responsibilities for Scheduled Tribes as well as other registered forest inhabitants, lays out a clear, three-step system for determining who deserves such benefits and their recognition. These are listed as follows:

  • The Act emphasizes the significance of the whole gram sabha, rather than just the gram panchayat. The members of the gram sabha are given the right to make recommendations about who owns and cultivates the land, how long they own or cultivate it, and so on.
  • The democratic structure of the gram sabha, featuring involvement by diverse members of the community and transparent discussion, is the justification for entrusting the task to it.
  • However, in keeping with the democratic institutionalization of the local legislature, or gram sabha, their suggestions aren’t definitive and are sent for screening at two levels: taluka and district.

Relevance of Section 6 in the Act

  1. The authority to make the ultimate judgment has been delegated to the district-level committee under Section 6(6) of the Act.
  2. The committees are composed of six members, three of whom are elected and the remaining three are government professionals.
  3. Section 6(2) states that if an individual considers a statement is false and applies to the Committee in support of the statement and the Committee ends up demonstrating the claims regarding the validity, the claimant’s privileges are refused.
  4. Section 6(4) is a duplicate replica of the preceding paragraph, with the exception that it extends to the provincial level.
  5. Another essential privilege recognized by this Act is that the land authorized by this legislation cannot be sold or transferable.

Challenges faced by the Forest Act

There were numerous problems that the Forest Act had to overcome to work effectively for the development, rehabilitation, and preservation of plant and animal species from extinction, including:

The forest bureaucracy’s unwillingness to transfer authority

The forest bureaucracy’s pure incompetence of both centres and states, as well as huge enterprises, to a certain measure. The dread of forest bureaucracy losing great control over land and people of present joys with corporates having the fear of losing cheat accessibility to important natural resources.

Absence of information

Lower-level forest authorities were unclear of how forest ownership practices may be used to seize a large percentage of the population and keep them in the dark about their rights. The forest administration has misconstrued the forest rights act as a weapon to regulate welfare encroachment and its measures for tribals.

Complacency in the administration

Acts concerning the ecosystem do not conform with the laws or illegal settlements which have been stated to be denied arbitrarily and remain the greatest obstacle in implementation. The main vote bank in provinces was not tribals, allowing administrations to readily undermine the Forest Rights Act (FRA) for monetary benefit.

Acts and provisions concerning related Act

The Forest Rights Act of 2006 is based on three main provisions and acts:

Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972

The government passed the Wildlife (Protection) Act of 1972 intending to protect the nation’s wildlife and prevent poaching, trafficking, and illegal dealing in wildlife and byproducts. The Act was revised in January 2003, increasing the severity of the fines and fines for offenses under the Act.

The government proposed some additional adjustments to the laws by adding strict procedures to reinforce the Act. The goal of environmentally preserved zones is to respond to endangered flora and animals and provide support.

The Provisions of the Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA)

Tradition and much-varied persevering and protecting traditions of people from different cultures, community programs, and style of dispute settlement with some practices. This provides the appropriate degree of gram sabha/panchayats with mandated consultative privileges in acquiring land and restoration of displaced people. PESA will have greater supervision over the use of government funds which will lessen alienation in tribal communities. This facilitates the exploitation of tribal groups and allows for the management of lending money as well as the management of the use of alcohol stores in village marketplaces.

Article 243B provides for the establishment of a three-tier structure for the Panchayati system:

Gram Panchayat

In the panchayat pyramid structure, the gram panchayat is the lowest level. The zone in a village is subdivided into even smaller units known as wards, each of which elects its representatives. Ward members, also known as the Panch, are members of the Panch. The Sarpanch, the head of the Gram Panchayat, is also elected by the Gram Sabha. As a result, the Gram Panchayat is made up of the Sarpanch and the Panch. The Gram Panchayat’s key responsibilities include societal problems, the construction and maintenance of institutions, roadways and drainage systems, and the levying and collection of local taxes. The Gram Panchayat is responsible to the Gram Sabha, the village’s main group of voters as well as the two tiers of authority above it in the system.

Panchayat Samiti

The Panchayat Samiti will be the next institution. It supervises the operations of all of the Gram Panchayats in the villages that fall under its supervision. The Pradhan is in charge of the Panchayat Samiti. He or she is chosen by a body that includes all representatives of the Panchayat Samiti as well as all Panchs of the Gram Panchayats that fall under its jurisdiction.

Zila Parishad

That’s the highest level of panchayat in the local self-government structure, often called District Panchayat. It supervises the operations of all of the Panchayat Samitis in the district under its jurisdiction, as well as all of the Gram Panchayats that fall under them. It also oversees the release of funding across all Gram Panchayats. It is in charge of developing district-level expansion plans. The Chairman is in charge of the Zila Parishad. It also has a member that is elected by the State government: the Chief Executive Officer.

Case laws 

Wildlife first v. Ministry of Forest and Environment (2019)

In this case, the Forest Rights Act of 2006 was being reviewed by the Supreme Court for its constitutionality.

Facts of the case 

Wildlife First, the Wildlife Trust of India, and other environmentalists petitioned the Supreme Court in 2008 to have the Forest Rights Act (Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006) examined for constitutional legitimacy. They claim that the Act has resulted in deforestation and forest area encroachment.

Individuals claiming interests under the Act should be able to show that they have been and continue to either reside on forests or forestland or rely on forest products for a living. The Act acknowledges two categories of people who can gain ownership under it:

  • Scheduled Tribes of Forest Dwellers.
  • Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (OTFDs) are communities that have lived in the woods for at least 75 years.

One of the petitioners’ principal requests was for the return of forest land that had been trespassed at by persons whose rights to land under the Forest Rights Act had been denied. The petitioners filed an interlocutory application in 2014, demanding that the Judicial order the states remove unlawful forest residents. The Supreme Court ruled on February 13, 2019, that states must remove all individuals whose applications under the Act were denied by July 24, 2019. It also ordered the Forest Survey of India to perform a satellite survey and identify the locations of encroachment before and after clearances. Furthermore, it ordered the Chief Secretaries of different states to provide documents detailing how they had neglected to evict people whose claims had been denied up to this point. On February 28, the Tribunal put a hold on one’s own decision, asking states to give information on whether they had implemented due process when dismissing applications.

Issues in the case 

  1. Whether states have implemented due process while denying forest residents’ claims.
  2. Whether the procedure for filing claims under the Forest Rights Recognition Act of 2006 is valid.
  3. Whether the 2006 Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act is legal.

Judgment

After the government failed to defend the legitimacy of the Forest Rights Act, the Supreme Court ordered the forced eviction of nearly 1,000,000 tribals and other forest-dwelling households from forestlands throughout 16 states. The Chief Secretaries of all 16 states were ordered by the three-judge bench of Arun Mishra, Navin Sinha, and Indira Banerjee, JJ to, “ensure that where the rejection orders have been passed, eviction will be carried out on or before the next date of hearing. In case the eviction is not carried out, as aforesaid, the matter would be viewed seriously by this Court.”

Orissa Mining Corporation v. Ministry of Environment & Forest & Others (2013)

In this case, to conserve Niyamgiri from a proposed mining project by a multinational company, the Indigenous Dongria Kondhs took action, which is undoubtedly the most amazing read of the Forest Right Act, which could be a rights-based process to achieve the efficient representation of Indigenous peoples and local communities protections to reinforce the policy making community over the sacrosanct environment.

Facts of the case 

In this case, the business Sterlite Industrial applied for approval to build a bauxite ore mine on forest property in Orissa’s Niyamgiri Hills, which is home to an indigenous tribe known as the Dongria Kondh, which numbers 8,000 people and includes many children. The Ministry of Environment and Forests had granted tentative environmental approval, which will be finalized after an examination of the project’s effects on the Dongria Kondh community.

Following impact evaluations undertaken by several government agencies, it was determined that the intended progress would infringe on the rights of the Dongria community and therefore be denied. However, Vedanta had already started the project and constructed a refinery at the bottom of the Niyamgiri Hills. Sterlite’s application for environmental approval was ultimately refused by the Ministry, which stated that the initiative had shown an obvious and startling contempt for the tribal groups’ rights, which are protected by the Forest Rights Act. In this matter, the corporation is requesting that the Court reverse the Ministry’s decision.

The issue in the case

  • Whether denying environmental approval for the construction of a mine because of the mine’s impact on indigenous tribes is lawful.

Judgment 

The Court considered whether indigenous people have a right to land possessed by the company. The Judge goes on to explain that the state owns natural resources as a trustee for the citizens, and any attempts to exploit these resources must be approved by local inhabitants. The Dongria unanimously opposed the Vedanta project after a series of 12 village discussions. Besides the collection and sale of small forest products to earn their living, the Court recognised that agriculture was the tribes’ only source of revenue. The tribes have strong emotional ties to their respective territories.

Adivasi Kanikkar Samyuktha Sangham v. Union of India (2019)

In this case, the Division Bench of Hrishikesh Roy, CJ, and A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J. approved the withdrawal of a writ appeal, reasoning that since the case involved forest residents’ rights, a review of the writ petition would be the proper approach.

Facts of the case 

The interests of traditional forest residents were at issue in this case. Although several reliefs were decided to seek in the case brought for the protection of forest dwellers, and the counsel therein was attempting to make application well before learned Judge only for interim relief, the entire case was disposed of without allowing the appellant (petitioner in the said writ petition) to submit other prayers, according to Mr. K.S. Madhusoodanan, learned counsel appearing for the appellant. As a result, the Court was unable to address the other ten substantive requests in the writ petition.

Appellant’s learned counsel submission 

In these conditions, Mr. Madhusoodanan argued that he should be allowed to withdraw the current appeal and file a review petition with the writ court for a new hearing, especially as neither the State nor the Central Government needed to file a counter affidavit in the writ suit. He argued that where essential rights for traditional forest inhabitants are being advocated in writ proceedings, pleas should be examined after the counter affidavit(s) are filed, revealing the State’s and the Central Government’s positions.

Judgment 

The Court rejected the aforementioned appeal as not challenged and allowed the appellant the right to submit a review petition in light of the foregoing submissions.

Conclusion 

The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers Act (Recognition of Rights) Act, 2006 is important and necessary. Whenever a nation is establishing and fully on the journey of the capitalist system, the law takes on even greater significance, creating it even more meaningful to deliver a representative characteristic for marginalized and disadvantaged communities and groups, such as the Tribals as well as other equivalent indigenous groups, from the requisite evils of building and infrastructure growth while also securing their survival.

References 


LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/joinchat/J_0YrBa4IBSHdpuTfQO_sA

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

An analysis of medical negligence 

0
Image source - https://bit.ly/3fXrkgl

This article is written by Varchaswa Dubey, from JECRC University, Jaipur. This article reflects the exhaustive work concerning medical negligence and its in-depth study. The article also aims at providing an understanding of medical negligence. 

Introduction 

The concept of medical negligence refers to the malpractice of a medical professional who fails to meet the standards of his/her profession which results in the death of a patient who was expecting the medical professional to save her/her life. Medical negligence is the most shameful act a medical professional can conduct because this negligence most of the time results in the death of the patient. 

According to Black’s Law dictionary, negligence refers to the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided by those ordinary considerations which ordinarily regulate human affairs, would do or the doing of something which a reasonable and prudent man would not do.

Medical negligence in legal terms refers to the breach of a duty of care, which results in damage. The damages may be in monetary terms, health terms, derogating the condition of the patient, causing trauma to the patient, leaving the patient in irredeemable condition for the rest of his/her life, etc. 

India has inherited the principles of English law and most of the contemporary laws prevailing in India are the direct consequence of the inheritance of the laws from English law. One such principle is the case of Bolam v. Friern Hospital Management Committee (1957). However, the position was amended in the year 2001 when such a test was abandoned by English courts which made the requirements of medical negligence stricter; however, the Indian courts continued to follow the principles laid down in Bolam’s case. 

Origins of the medical evaluation 

There is no rebuttal considering the development of the medical fraternity over the years. From Ayurvedic medicine, which India has been practising for more than 5000 years, to the german originated Allopathic medicines, around the year 1800 and ever since. 

During the ancient times, in Hammurabi’s Code, carelessness and neglect were severely punished, as in the case of the unskillful physician, if it led to the loss of life or limb, his hands were cut off and if such death was of a slave, then the person who conducted the operation must give another slave as a compensation. 

In Manusmriti, references of medical negligence can be found, and such negligence was considered more of a crime than a tort. The Kautilya’s Arthashastra also considered that if the death of a patient under treatment is due to carelessness in the treatment, the physician shall be punished. 

During the 19th Century, England witnessed the evolution of the medical fraternity. However, the medical practitioners were initially bound by the rules of the East India Company, but later on, this concept was also practised in India and this can be considered as the origins of contemporary times medical practice in India. The initial bodies governing the medical fraternity were the Medical Council of India by virtue of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1933, later the Nursing Council of India was established in 1947. 

Bolam’s test vis-a-vis Bolitho’s test 

Bolam’s test 

Bolam’s test evolved in the case of Bolam v. Friern Hospital Management Committee, 1957, where the plaintiff, Mr. John Hector Bolam, admitted himself to the Friern hospital to undergo depression treatment. The doctor who was employed to cure the plaintiff failed to give him muscle-relaxant drugs as a result of which the plaintiff suffered a fracture of both his hips and the plaintiff sued the hospital claiming the doctor was negligent in fulfilling his duties. The plaintiff further argued that if he knew the risks involved, he wouldn’t have undergone therapy and that medical professions were negligent in fulfilling their duties. 

The court, in this case, did not find the defendant liable for their acts. The court held that it was not a common practice for the doctors to convey the risks involved in the procedure. Furthermore, the court while relying on the testimony of experts who held different opinions for the use of muscle relaxant and most of the experts were of the view that they wouldn’t have taken such muscle relaxant and therefore the court was of the view that doctors and nurses had not acted negligently in their treatment of Mr. Bolam. 

The test to determine the negligence can be understood by the words of the judgment i.e. “A doctor is not guilty of negligence if he has acted in accordance with the practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical men skilled in that particular art. Putting it the other way round, a man is not negligent if he is acting in accordance with such a practice, merely because there is a body of opinion who would take a contrary view.” 

It was further held that “where you get a situation which involves the use of some special skill or competence, then the test whether there has been negligence or not is not the test of the man on the top of a Clapham omnibus, because he has not got this special skill. The test is the standard of the ordinary skilled man exercising and professing to have that special skill. A man may not possess the highest expert skill at the risk of being found negligent. It is well-established law that it is sufficient if he exercises the ordinary skill of an ordinary competent man exercising that particular art. A doctor is not negligent if he is acting in accordance with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical men skilled in that particular art.”

Bolitho’s test 

The Bolitho test evolved from the case of Bolitho v. City and Hackney Health Authority (1997), which challenged the approach of medical negligence taken in the case of Bolam. The case briefly unfolds as, in 1984, a two-year-old child named Patrick Nigel Bolitho, was admitted to the St. Bartholomew’s Hospital. The child was suffering from croup. Initially discharged after senior doctors saw his condition, the child derogated the following day, and the doctors, while admitting this, admitted the child and appointed a nurse to take care of the child. But the condition of the child continued to deteriorate and the child eventually succumbed but was revived after 10 minutes. Such events caused brain damage to the child and he later died and his parents filed a case of negligence of conduct at the hospital. 

The House of Lords, in this case, found the presiding medical officer guilty of negligent conduct. The court, while further determining if the child would have died if the doctor would have attended him, took the advice of eight experts, while five of them were of the opinion that they would have intubated the child, the other three were of the opinion that they wouldn’t have done such acts, and therefore the court did not find the accused senior doctor guilty of negligence. The court further held – “The use of adjectives ‘responsible, reasonable and respectable’, all show that the court has to be satisfied that the exponents of the body of medical opinion relied upon can demonstrate that such opinion has a logical basis. In particular, in cases involving as they so often do, the weighing of risks against benefits, the judge before accepting a body of opinion as being responsible, reasonable, or respectable will need to be satisfied that, in forming their views, the experts had directed their minds to the question of comparative risks and benefits and had reached a defensible conclusion on the matter”.

What amounts to negligence 

The court, in Bolam’s case, held – “If an error would not have been made by a reasonably competent professional man professing to have the standard and type of skill that the defendant held himself as having, and acting with ordinary care, then it is negligence. If, on the other hand, it is an error that such a man, acting with ordinary care, might have made, then it is not negligence”.

The Supreme Court of India, in the case of Kusum Sharma & Ors v. Batra Hospital & Medical Research (2010), held that “Negligence is the breach of a duty exercised by omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided by those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do”.

To establish negligence against a doctor, the essentials are: 

  • Duty of Care: If the doctor owed a duty of care towards the patient or person who has suffered mental and physical injury, then the doctor is guilty of medical negligence and shall be expelled to practice further.
  • Breach of Duty: The second factor is the establishment of the fact that despite the doctor owing a duty of care towards the patient, the former failed to fulfil such duty and has breached in fulfilling his duty towards his/her profession.
  • Causing of injury: It must be established that a doctor owed a duty of care towards the patient and he/she failed in fulfilling his duty and such failure has resulted in injury or death to the patient.

It is only negligence if the aggrieved party establishes all these factors in the court of law. 

Effects of medical negligence 

Medical negligence has numerous consequences like:

  • Adding of costs: Medical negligence results in additional treatment or surgeries, which not only adds to the bills of medical but also other hospital expenses like admitting expenses, more therapy sessions, etc.
  • Exhausting of insurance: Medical negligence results in the plaintiff taking more insurance support which eventually exhausts all his savings and health insurance. 
  • It leads to lengthy court procedures: Medical litigation is usually lengthy and time-consuming for the plaintiff as well as the respondent, which adds to the problem of the patient or his legal representatives or family members.
  • Making the initial situation worse: Medical negligence makes the initial condition of the patient worse by giving more complications and injuries to the patient. 
  • It results in lifelong traumas: Recovering from an injury can be easy with the assistance of good doctors and medicines; however it may take lifelong to recover from the trauma or shock, sufferings, pain, etc. caused to the patient who underwent an operation to improve his/her conditions. 
  • Unnecessary medical procedures: Medical negligence also leads to other medical surgeries which are performed to undo or compensate for the medical negligence caused by the doctors.

Medical negligence in India

Death by medical negligence is primarily punished under Section 304A of Indian Penal Code, 1860, (IPC), where punishment for causing death by rash and negligent act is reserved for a term which may extend up to 2 years, or with fine, or both.

Not every act where a person goes to a medical professional to undergo a surgery or procedure, which involves rash and the negligent act falls within the ambit of Section 304 A of IPC however, it will be a criminal act if the medical professional employs gross lack on his part. 

It was held in the case of Kurban Hussein Mohammedali v. State Of Maharashtra (1964), “To impose criminal liability under Section 304A of IPC, it is necessary that the death should have been the direct result of a rash and negligent act of the accused, and that act must be the proximate and efficient cause without the intervention of another’s negligence.” 

In the case of V. Kishan Rao v. Nikhil Super Speciality Hospital (2010), the plaintiff, who was also an officer in the malaria department, filed a complaint against the hospital for negligent conduct in treating his wife regarding the wrong treatment of his wife. The plaintiff alleged that the hospital was negligent in treating his wife with typhoid fever instead of malaria fever due to the negligence of medications by the employees of the hospital. The plaintiff, in this case, got a compensation of 2,00,000 rupees. 

Guidelines of Supreme Court of India

The Supreme Court of India, in the case of Jacob Mathew v. State Of Punjab & Anr (2005), gave certain guidelines concerning medical negligence:

  • A complaint may not be entertained unless the person giving such complaint produces prima facie evidence before the court to support his/her claim of negligence of the accused doctor.
  • The appointed investigating officer must, before initiating proceedings against the accused doctor, consult with a doctor in government services who must be unbiased and impartial in giving his opinion after applying Bolam’s test to the case.
  • The accused doctor shall not be arrested routinely unless such arrest is necessary for further investigation or until the investigating officer, if satisfied that the doctor would not make himself available to face the prosecution, may be arrested. 

Conclusion 

Medical negligence is the worst type of conduct by a medical professional because people usually expect such a person to save the life of others and not take or make it worse. Cases of medical negligence are witnessed every day, which causes pain, agony, and suffering to the patient, and to reduce such misconduct, the government of India and its medical fraternity must improve the conditions of its medical practitioners by improving the education quality and emphasizing professional conduct education. 

The concept of medical negligence is well established in India however the Indian judiciary still follows Bolam’s test which is outdated and vague and therefore new methods to determine medical negligence must be adopted by the Indian judiciary. 

To deliver justice in cases of medical negligence, the Indian judiciary must adopt new approaches so that at least the sufferings of a person in courts can be prevented. The court must award heavy punishments for those found guilty of medical negligence and also impose heavy fines on hospitals that have employed such negligent professionals. 

References 

  1. http://ijme.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/1444-5.pdf 
  2. http://lib.unipune.ac.in:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/9763/08_Chapter%202.pdf?sequence=8&isAllowed=y 
  3. http://www.smj.org.sg/sites/default/files/4301/4301l1.pdf 
  4. https://www.nature.com/articles/4800441.pdf?origin=ppub 
  5. https://lawtimesjournal.in/case-of-medical-negligence-how-the-judiciary-can-punish-a-lifesaver/ 

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/joinchat/J_0YrBa4IBSHdpuTfQO_sA

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Chinese funding in Zomato: impact of FDI regulations

0
Image source-https://rb.gy/d2cs0w

This article is written by Naresh Trivedi who is pursuing a Diploma in International Business Law from LawSikho.

Introduction

Pandemic!! Battered Economies!! Market Corrections!!

China sensed a great opportunity in the above conditions faced by the world. The Chinese business houses and the Government were on a buying spree across the continents of the world.

The newspapers and the business magazines were flooded with Chinese investment articles. During the rise of the pandemic in the mid-2020s the Chinese state-owned enterprises had a substantial stake in German-based large scale projects, this step leveraged the Chinese enterprises to have access to advanced technology.

Coming to India, China’s central bank, People’s Bank of China (PBoC) had acquired 1.01% stake in HDFC up to March 31, 2021. The stock price of HDFC had cracked sharply due to the pandemic effect in March, 2020 and April, 2020. During the same time many Indian blue chips companies stock prices had tumbled to south. The Indian Government decided to act quickly in order to avoid any untoward mishap in the Indian Corporate World.

The ball was set to roll, the Government of India assessed the FDI policy and decided to curb the opportunistic takeovers and acquisitions of the Indian companies due to pandemic and issued the press note dated April 17, 2020, to amend the FDI Policy. Subsequently, the Ministry of Finance, Department of Economic Affairs had notified the press note contents in form of FEMA Rules as the Foreign Exchange Management (Non-debt Instruments) Amendment Rules, 2020 dated April 22, 2020. The Government of India tried to rein the Chinese dragon through the promulgated press note, which could have far-reaching effect on the Indian startup ecosystem, considering the substantial investment by the Chinese investors. 

In addition to the pandemic, the geopolitical tensions between the neighbouring nations too added fuel to the fire. As a result, the Government of India decided to block Chinese apps in India and those apps which have substantial Chinese investment.

However, the step to block Chinese apps by the Government of India was majorly taken to protect the privacy data. One of the major Chinese apps TikTok was caught stealing the app-users data from the clipboard. Additionally, many other Chinese apps had their data storage servers in China, which grossly breached the local privacy laws.

Without deviating further from the topic let’s a drawback to the FDI concerns faced by Zomato, post notification of revised norms.

Anomalies ahead for startups

No doubt, the Government of India had taken the bold step to avoid any opportunistic hostile takeover and mergers in the Indian corporate world, more particularly startups. But it had added the additional burden on the Indian companies to avail prior permission of the Government in order to seek investment for the bordering nations.

Position prior to amendment

The non-residents were allowed to invest in India, subject to FDI Policy except in those sectors/activities which were prohibited. However, a citizen of Bangladesh or Pakistan or an entity incorporated in Bangladesh or Pakistan could invest only under the Government approval route in sectors/activities which were not prohibited.

Position post amendment

The non-residents were allowed to invest in India, subject to FDI Policy except in those sectors/activities which were prohibited. However, an entity of a country that shares a land border with India or where the beneficial owner of investment into India is situated in or is a citizen of any such country could invest only under the Government approval route in sectors/activities which were not prohibited.

From the above position, it is clear that earlier it was only Bangladesh and Pakistan citizens or entities incorporated in Bangladesh and Pakistan were allowed to invest in India, subject to the approval of the Government of India.

Post amendment, the citizens and the entities or those entities which had beneficial owners from such countries sharing a land border with India, viz China, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Myanmar, Bhutan, and Afghanistan were allowed to invest in India subject to the approval of the Government of India.   

Prior to amendment, it was plain vanilla due diligence for investee company in India to identify the citizenship of the investor, by looking at the passport, etc., or the place of residence of the entity by merely perusing the incorporation documents of the entity.

Post amendment the investee company has to thoroughly scrutinize the origin of an entity as well as the beneficial owners of the investor company. However, the term beneficial owner is not defined under the notification or the FEMA laws prevailing in the country. 

Alternatively, the definition can be borrowed either from the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Rules, 2018 as framed under the Companies Act, 2013 or from the Prevention of Money-laundering (Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005.

From Zomato’s lens

Zomato in October 2018 had raised $210 million from Alibaba’s payment affiliate Ant Financial Services, Alipay Singapore Holdings Pte Ltd. In this investment round, Ant Financial Services had received ownership of a stake of over 14.7% in Zomato. Additionally, Ant Financial Services has invested $150 million during early 2018. Therefore, the shareholding of Ant Financial Services had reached to around 22% in Zomato at one point before the notification of the press note as referred above.

Subsequently, on January 9, 2020, Zomato and its founders had entered into a definitive agreement with Antfin Singapore Holdings Pte Ltd for the investment of $150 million in form of two separate tranches of $50 million and $100 million. However, the transaction pertaining to $50 million was duly undertaking by Zomato before the release of the aforesaid press note. Unfortunately, Zomato founders had to drop the plan with respect to the investment of $100 million in the Company.

Zomato struggled to get another $100 million investment tranche from Antfin Singapore Holdings Pte Ltd out of the committed investment of $150 million. With the restrictions imposed by the Government of India and the aforesaid notification dated April 22, 2020, in place the Chinese entity, Antfin Singapore Holdings Pte Ltd could not invest further in India without the approval of the Government of India.

The approval requirement could include additional costs to Chinses entity and as well to Zomato, therefore, the additional tranche of investment of $100 million was called off by Zomato.

It would have been hard for Zomato to give away the $100 million investment from Antfin Singapore Holdings Pte Ltd. On the contrary, Zomato was relieved to understand the grandfathering effect allowed on the earlier Chinese investments received in the Company. Rather, the Government of India was silent on the earlier investments received by Indian companies from Chinese entities. 

However, the notification does mention that where existing shareholding is transferred to a Chinese entity and as a result of which there is a change in beneficial ownership then such transaction shall be liable to be carried out with the approval of the Government of India.

Zomato IPO disclosure

The aforesaid notification had compelled Zomato to make one additional disclosure in its DRHP under the heading Restrictions of Foreign Ownership of Indian Securities, under the said heading Zomato had specifically mentioned the restrictions in place with reference to investors bidding from the countries sharing a land border with India.

Furthermore, any bidder who intended to subscribe to the offer was required to seek prior approval from the Government of India and the said approval was required to be submitted with Zomato and the Registrar of the offer in writing within the offer period.

Conclusion

The restriction imposed by the Government of India on Chinese investments in India is a classic example to understand how geopolitical tensions can lead to setbacks for any business decision. However, we are living in an uncertain world where life is uncertain.

The startup ecosystem definitely rejoiced the grandfathering effect given to the earlier Chinese investments in India. Had there would have been the arbitrary decision by the Government of India to return all the Chinese investment as received to date by the Indian companies, then it would have certainly been no lesser than the apocalypse for startup eco-system in India where the Chinses investments are so deep-rooted.

The Government of India intended to close all routes of foreign investment for the neighbouring countries, but the amendment relates only to the provisions of FDI, which is among one of the routes for receiving foreign funds in India. However, the alternative routes such as FPI, AIF, REITs, InvITs, etc. are not touched upon by the Government of India.

Therefore, in view of above it can be concluded that the Government of India intended to close all route of foreign investment from neighbouring countries but in view to avoid massive repercussions associated with the FPI and various funds those regulated by SEBI like AIF, REITs, and InvITs, unless the where the ultimate beneficial owner of the said funds in citizen or entity associated with a neighbouring country, the Government of India did not touch upon to block investments from such routes.

Finally, it can be stated that from Zomato’s perspective the amendment to FDI rules was a sharp googly, in the mid of circumstances where it was planning to go public.

Reference

 


LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/joinchat/J_0YrBa4IBSHdpuTfQO_sA

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content. 

Download Now

Rights of prisoners during Covid-19 : A study of the laws applicable in India and other countries

0
Image source-https://rb.gy/4lvoxy

This article is written by Niharika Agrawal, pursuing B.B.A.L.L.B from IFIM Law School. This article deals with the rights of the prisoner during Covid-19 and its comparative study between India and other nations. 

Introduction

Covid-19 was a great challenge for the entire world. Millions of people were affected by the Covid-19 pandemic either financially or medically. Everywhere there was a risk on each individual of getting infected. However, the most affected people were prisoners, as they stay in one common space that is prison. 

The detention facilities which were provided were not always efficient. Poor nutrition, lack of hygiene and cleanliness facilities, most dangerous ‘overcrowding’, inadequate medical facilities, etc were some of the factors affecting prisoners’ health. Thus it can be concluded that the prisoner’s life was at utmost risk and this has led to the worst form of violation of human rights during this pandemic. 

It is not just India that has faced this pandemic situation but also the entire world. This article leads to the comparative study of the measures taken by India and the other countries for the rights of the prisoner in this tough period of the Covid-19. 

Measures that were taken in the prison

Various measures were taken by the government to protect the prisoners from being infected. But unfortunately, it was not always adequate. Detention centres being a common overcrowded place, it was difficult to manage under this whole situation. Regardless of this, some basic following measures were taken by the detention centres. Such measures were undertaken as per the laws of the states. 

Decongestion of prison

As per the orders of the Supreme Court, prisons were released on emergency parole and on interim bail to decongest the prisons. This was done to reduce the population of the prison for Covid-19. But this measure was not effective due to delay in the processing of the court orders in decongestion of the prison. 

Isolation of new prisoners

New prisoners were isolated so that there is no transmission of infection from outside. However, due to a lack of sanitization and care facilities, it was difficult to maintain a healthy environment. As per the undertrial prisoners though the positive inmates were staying separate, however, such separation was absent during the meals. 

Formation of new Covid-19 care centres

There were establishments of covid centers at many detention centers in the states and such centres also needed medical professionals to take care of the patients or inmates. It was also suggested to have a daily screening of the prisoners and periodic health checks. 

Establishment of new prisons for increasing capacity

On the orders of the Bombay High Court, it was suggested to build new prisons for the inmates to increase the capacity and to overcome the problem of excessive population. It was important to remove overcrowdedness as it was one crucial solution to deal with this situation. 

Vaccination of prisoners

Vaccines were also provided in the prisons for the prisoners so that they can receive their vaccination jab on time. But as per the reports till now many prisoners are yet to be vaccinated in many states moreover due to the unavailability of vaccines there might be further delay in the process of immunization. 

Hygiene and cleanliness

Another important task was maintaining complete hygiene and cleanliness in the prisons. The prisoners were provided with separate soap, masks, etc. they were often advised to wash their hands and were also encouraged to not sleep facing each other. 

Awareness program

Prisoners were made aware of the infection,  its implications and its impacts. Safety measures and the guidelines by the government were well explained. Various posters and videos were displayed and also awareness programs were conducted. 

Such measures were taken by the states to protect the prisoners from this virus. However, due to the unavailability of the facilities, it was not worth up to the expectations. It is very important to have permanent medical services to prevent such a tragedy in the future. 

Human rights violations

The prisoners are though deprived of their basic right to liberty for the fact being they are the prisoners but cannot be restricted to practice their other human rights. As per the reports of Amnesty International, it was stated that the measures taken by the government are not sufficient for the prevention of the spread of the virus, and this in itself is a violation of human rights. Following were some challenges faced by the prisoners in this pandemic situation.

Lack of medicinal care

Several countries as well as states in India took initiative to establish medical centers for the daily screening of the prisoners and also were provided with technical equipment and other required medicines for the safety of the prisoners. However, this was not followed in all the states. There was a lack of medical professionals for the daily screening of the prisoners. Vaccinations are yet to be completed in prisons. 

Social distancing, sanitization, hygiene and cleanliness, timely availability of medicines, isolation of outsiders, special care for positive patients, etc. were not maintained upto the mark. The most impacted by this were women in the prisons as there was a lack of sanitation and hygiene. No extra precautions were provided to the women for menstrual, pregnancy, etc.

Visits suspended

As soon as the lockdown was declared, all the departments of the prisons had restricted physical meetings inside the prisons. Prisoners were unable to meet their families, lawyers, and other prisoners and this has affected the mental health of the prisoners. No adequate alternatives were even provided by the prison staff. Entire visits were suspended.

Family visits

As the family physical meetings were suspended due to the pandemic, no communication was possible. Due to this prisoners were worried about the security and the protection and most important well being of the family. Such a lack of communication made it more difficult for the prisoners to deal with this situation. 

Solutions such as video conferencing, callings, etc were provided but not proven to be fruitful. In states like Karnataka, there was a restriction on the time duration of calling such as a maximum of 5 to 10 minutes, or like Jammu and Kashmir, it was once in 15 days. In some states, it was in operation from December 2020. This brought a gap in communication between the prisoners and their families. 

Lawyers visit

Lawyers’ visits play an important role especially for those prisoners who were waiting for their trial or final sentence or parole long back. This suspension of lawyers visiting increased the level of anxiety among the prisoners. In some states, though it was made possible to communicate with the lawyers through physical meetings or video conferences or calls, however, this process was very slow. The prisoners have lost hopes for their early better life and no contact with the lawyers was possible and delay in proceedings. 

Inspection visit

In this pandemic, there was a need for more security and protection against the violation of human rights. Suspension of the inspection team led to more malpractice in the prison. No one was there to monitor the mechanism of the prisoners in the detention centres.   

Involvement of NGOs and other organizations

Several NGOs and different welfare organizations have provided their helping hands in this pandemic situation. Such NGOs and organizations have helped the prisoners with lots of essential services such as food, medicines, safety equipment, etc. They have also initiated education and training services and organized cultural activities for the entertainment of the prisoners who are confined in the four walls. 

They have also organized awareness programs in the prison to fight this pandemic situation. These organizations have also provided therapeutic services for bringing some positive energy among the prisoners.   They have used all the precautionary measures and alternatives such as video conferencing for the arrangements of such programs. 

However, even after certain initiatives were taken by these NGOs and organizations there were some problems faced by the detention centres which completely relied upon them for their services. During this period there was often delay in providing things in the prison. Sometimes it was even difficult to reach out to the problems of the prisoners. 

Restriction on temporary bail from prison

As soon as the lockdown was declared by the Hon’ble PM of India on 23rd March 2020, the Supreme Court announced the release of prisoners either on parole or interim bail for the management of the population of prison and also to decongest the prison. However, this measure was not conducive to its purpose. This was due to the limited functioning of the courts and delay in the process of decongestion of the prison. 

During the lockdown, the use of criminal justice machinery increased and this resulted in several arrests. According to the reports, 27% of the prisons in 19 states and union territories remained overcrowded. Hence it was observed that the number of inmates released was almost equal to the number of new inmates. Thus there was no change in the gathering of the prisoners and the prisons remained overcrowded. 

This was observed in the state of Madhya Pradesh. Immediately after lockdown, almost 7000 prisoners were released and in the subsequent months, it was observed that nearly 6500 new undertrial inmates were brought into the prison. This concludes that the measure of decongestion of prison was not successful up to its expectation. 

Restriction on movement of prisoners inside the prison

Lockdown has not just restricted the movement of the people in the country from their homes but has also restricted the movement of the prisoners within their prison. This was done with the intention of preventing infection but it turned into a violation of basic human rights. The prisoners were not allowed to attend their training sessions or to gain information. They were also restricted from socializing with the other prisoners which adversely impacted them and it felt likely to be torture and not less than any punishment for no reason. 

Technical arrangements

Various alternatives were planned by the government for the prisoners so that they can contact or communicate with their families and lawyers. Such alternatives were as follows.

Phone calls

This was one of the easy alternatives to communicate with the family and other people during the pandemic as there were restrictions for physical meetings. However, there were many restrictions provided to the prisoners such as time limitations or were not being allowed to communicate everyday but once in a few days. These alternatives were provided after a few months of lockdown due to which anxiety among the prisoners was increased. 

Video conferencing

Video conferencing was another alternative set up for the meeting of the prisoners. Prisoners were allowed to talk to their family members face to face to know their well-being and were also used for the communication between lawyers and prisoners for discussing the status of their case. However, there were also challenges in this alternative as this needs access to the internet and there were network issues in the prison. Lots of technical equipment was required to set up this which was hold-up for a long time in the use of this video conferencing.

Precautionary measures for visitors

Various precautions were taken for the visitors so that there is no impact from the outsiders to inmates. Such precautionary elements were as follows:

  1. Screening of the visitors is to check whether they are not convicted of any kind of illness before visiting a prison.
  2. Maximum 2 visitors per prisoner.
  3. Social distancing among the prisoners and visitors. 
  4. No entry without sanitization and mask. 
  5. Washing hands before and after meetings. 

World prison brief

World prison brief is a unique database that provides all the basic and detailed information about prisons and prisoners, around the world for free. It helps in the development of prison policy and practice throughout the world. Every country provides the information every month extracted from the government or other official resources. 

It provides information regarding the population of the prisons, use of imprisonment for women, juveniles, and foreign tribunals, remand imprisonment, level of occupancy, the ministry responsible for prisons, etc. It also provides a comparative study of two or more different countries. 

‘Forgotten behind bars  Covid-19 and prisons’: report

Forgotten behind bars is the report by Amnesty International which deals with the condition of the prisoners and their rights in the prison during the Covid-19 pandemic. According to this report, prisoners were neglected and measures taken were leading to severe human rights violations in prison globally. It has been pointed out that about 11 million people are imprisoned in the entire world, thus the prisoners are at utmost risk of this contagious virus due to overcrowding in the prisons. 

In many states, inmates have suffered huge problems in accessing soap, proper sanitization, social and physical distancing, and limited health care. It was opined that the vaccination should be prioritized for the prisoners which may either lead to catastrophic consequences for them.

Government should take initiative to provide all the essentials such as face masks, sanitizer and clean and hygiene surroundings, and water to prevent such an outbreak. Governments of many countries and states were unable to provide an accurate number of cases and deaths in the prison and also the details about their plan to vaccinate prisoners especially for those who are at higher risk. 

The report has further pointed out about the countries which are at a huge risk of overcrowding prisons such as Bulgaria, Egypt, Nepal failed to manage the outbreaks due to covid. It was also brought into notice that Iran and Turkey were the countries where human rights defenders and the prisoners were detained arbitrarily and were even not allowed from covid related release. To tackle this situation the governments of countries like Argentina and the United Kingdom have used arbitrary ways such as abusive confinement for almost 23 hours per day, nearly for a week or even sometimes for the month. 

The prison authorities sometimes used aggressive force against the prisoners who were protesting to meet their families and were unrest in the prisons. This has impacted the mental and physical health of the prisoners. After such struggles by prisoners around the world, almost 71 countries have introduced their vaccination policy for at least one clinically vulnerable group including the prison population and the staff.  

The International human rights organization has suggested the update of the public health data especially with regards to the population in prison, infection, treatment vaccination, etc. regularly. They have also requested to not discriminate against any prison for providing vaccination jabs.  In the end, Amnesty has also appealed to United Nation agencies and World Health Organisation to ensure that their further human rights are not being violated. 

Problems faced by the prisons in different countries 

As observed in the Amnesty International report,  prisons were prone for virus transmission globally. Every country affected by it has suffered the consequences of the covid crisis such as follows:

United States of America

The United States detected its first case in March 2020 in the main jail complex in New York City. After almost 2 weeks more 500 new cases were found in the country including incarcerated persons and the staff members even after taking essential efforts. Many prisons have reported outbreaks of the Covid-19 crisis and deaths. 

In the present time, jails are the most crowded places due to which their lives are in danger. One of the reasons for such spread was the infrastructure of the prison which was conducive to spreading disease. This led to difficulty in maintaining social distance in the prison.  

The old age people and people with disabilities or illnesses were the targets of this covid virus. It was observed that people above 55 years of age are suffering from either heart or lung disease and hence, these people were at severe risk of getting infected or dying. Although the US Constitution has provided a right to health care under which there is easy access to services, they are facing challenges due to the increase in needs of these old-age prison populations. It was difficult to manage the expenses of the treatment of these incarcerated people during the pandemic.

Measures to mitigate such problems were also taken by the departments from the very beginning such as protective equipment, testing, and medical care, etc. however reducing the population was very important to overcome such outbreaks. In some states, the prisoners who were in detention centers were released. However, this was a concern for public safety. Another problem for such released prisoners was that they were found to be homeless and in need of resources. 

In the end, it was opined that the covid-19 pandemic needs broad policy in the society to minimize such future tragedies. 

Africa

The problem of overcrowding was also found in South Africa especially in the countries of Morocco, Nigeria, Ethiopia, and Algeria. However, there was no estimated data regarding the affected population or testing in the prisons. 

Due to poor access to medical services, any communicable diseases are easily spread and this has happened in the case of Covid-19. Lack of medical professionals for consultation, improper sanitization, and other fundamental issues such as quality of food for growing immunity has led to such problems in prison. 

Prisoners’ mental health was impacted due to the confinement as there was also the absence of psychological and psychiatric care during this pandemic. There was a need for immunization for the weakened inmates, women and children, and the old age group of prisoners. It was noted in Africa that infringement of prison health is a threat to public health.

Africa has also faced the severe violation of human rights as there was no quality of food, healthcare, education, training, infrastructure, and good livelihood and these were the inhuman acts that led to the spread of infection. It was very essential to develop and strengthen human rights in the Africa prison system. 

Prison staff were in poor conditions of livelihood and were poorly paid. They were suffering from the overburden of violence in prison, overcrowding, poor health, etc. They were in contact with other public as well due to which they were at risk as a transmission medium in the prison as well as were at their homes. Hence it was necessary to provide them with proper health care and to resolve their fundamental issues.

Europe

Just like other countries, prisons in Europe were also in the bowl of overcrowdedness, poor health, violation of basic human rights, etc. There was an urgent demand for some action and solution by the Justicia network of the Human Rights Organisation.  The prisons in Europe were often in unsanitary conditions. 

Suspension of physical meetings of families and prisoners have increased tension and violence among them and also resulted in riots. They have also started reducing the population of the prisons to overcome the problem of overcrowding by releasing early, house arrest, delay in commencement of prison sentence, etc. this has led to 1000s of release. 

However not every member state has taken such initiative, especially the states like Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, etc. Due to the closure of the courts, there was a delay in prisoners’ pre-trial. 

The actual concern was that the physical well-being in Europe was not protected even after a clear obligation by the government to provide preventive medicines, adequate sanitary conditions, and health care. 

Legal Rights of the Prisoners

International Human Rights Law 

It provides protection to the prisoners from racial, discrimination, torture and enforced disappearances. Special rights are also provided for children, women, disabled people, migrants and indigenous peoples. There are some optional protocols available to deal with specific issues and to file a complaint.

United Nation Charters

The UN charter has provided basic principles for the treatment of prisoners. These principles are as follows:

  1. There shall no discrimination among the prisoners based on race, sex, colour, language, religion, political, national, social origin, property birth, or another status. 
  2. Respect all the beliefs and cultural practices of the prisoners. 
  3. Prisoners shall be treated with dignity and should be valued as human beings.
  4. All prisoners have the right to retain their human rights and fundamental rights provided under UDHR, ICESCR, ICCPR, and any other United covenants. 
  5. Prisoners have the right to participate in any cultural activities, education, and training for the full development of the human personality. 

International covenants on civil and political rights, 1966

The ICCPR is the core instrument treaty for the protection of the rights of the prisoners. It provides the following provisions:

  1. It provides liberty and security to the prisoners. It restricts arbitrary arrest or detention. 
  2. It contains provision for punishments against cruelty, inhumanity and degrading treatment. 
  3. It restrains imprisonment merely on the ground of inability to fulfil a contractual obligation. 

The Constitution of India, 1949

The Constitution of India provides some basic fundamental rights for both regular men and prisoners. The right to life and liberty under Article 21 also includes the right to live with dignity, food, bail, speedy trial and free legal aid services. Article 22 provides various guidelines for the rights of the prisoners in India. These rights include the right to consult lawyers, rights against inhuman treatment inside the jail and solitary confinement.  It is an exclusive right under the Indian Constitution. Article 14 treats every individual equally before the law and provides equal protection of law to all. 

Prisoners Act, 1894

This is the most ancient and first prisoners’ law in India. Section 37 of this Act provides urgent medical facilities for sick prisoners. It also obligates basic and essential commodities like clothing, bedding, food etc. Chapter VII of the act allows prisoners to work but not more than 9 hours a day with the superintendent’s permission. 

Important case laws

The threat in prisons has increased with the outbreak of this virus. Adding on such restrictions on visits, social distancing, poor ventilation, etc became more challenging for the prisoners to stay in prison. Specifically in India, it was the state of West Bengal that had outbroken the violence in the prisons soon after the sudden lockdown. 

During such protests, four were killed and many of them were injured. Similarly, other prisoners thinking of this as a violation of human rights had started protesting and demanding adequate facilities. During this entire pandemic, many judgments were given by the High Court and the Supreme Court regarding the protection of rights of the prisoners. Some of them are as follows:

In the case of Charles Sob Raj v. The Suptd., Central Jail Tihar (1978)  it was observed that the person who is imprisoned also carries their basic rights. Fundamental rights are equally available to all convicts as a regular person but with certain restrictions due to the latter’s imprisonment. Not providing appropriate medical facilities to inmates is a violation of basic rights. 

Further in the case of Pt. Parmanand Katara v. Union Of India and ors. (1989) the Supreme Court held that there is no alternative or second view for the protection of human life and it makes no difference between the criminal or an innocent person. 

The Constitution of India did not expressly provide with the right to health, however, in the judgment given by the Supreme Court of India in the case of Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoorsamity and Others v. State of West Bengal and others (1996) said that Article 21 of the Constitution of India also includes the right to healthcare facilities as an essential element under the right to life.

Conclusion

This period of Covid-19 is quite challenging for each and every person on the earth. Many people lost their loved ones due to this infection. However, it was even more difficult situation for the prisoners in the detention centers or the prisons. Life of the prisoners was equally at stake as the person outside the prison or maybe more. Some way or the other the prisoners were neglected during the Covid-19 pandemic. 

It is very important to note that the right to health care facilities is also a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution’s right to life though expressly not provided. The government needs to reform prisoners’ policies and take necessary action against the violation of laws. Inspection visitors should have regular and strict checks on the mechanism of the prison and use of alternative measures, their accessibility, and availability. Healthy, hygiene and clean food and environment needs to be maintained in the prisons.  

References

 


LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/joinchat/J_0YrBa4IBSHdpuTfQO_sA

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content. 

Download Now

SVAMITVA scheme – distribution of property cards in rural India

0
SVAMITVA Scheme
Image Source: https://rb.gy/cvjvnh

This article is written by Raslin Saluja, from KIIT School of Law, Bhubaneswar. This is an exhaustive article that attempts to analyse and explain the SVAMITVA scheme.

Introduction

The scheme has been in news ever since its launch on the National Panchayati Raj Day by the Prime Minister through video conferencing with the aim of distributing the e-property cards to the citizens of rural India. On the occasion of the launch itself, 4.09 lakh property wonders were given their property cards. The scheme has various benefits as it brings about Centre-state collaboration, there will be a spin-off benefit for municipalities and gram panchayats for property tax collections, using the property as a financial asset, maintenance of land records, and also in avoiding many natural calamities which will be observed by data processing.

What is the SVAMITVA scheme

The SVAMITVA Scheme as had been described in the national portal is a scheme under the central sector that was launched by the Hon’ble Prime Minister of India on 24th April 2020, the National Panchayat Day. SVAMITVA stands for Survey of Villages and Mapping with Improvised Technology in Village Areas. The Ministry of Panchayati Raj (MoPR) is the central coordinating agency for the implementation of the scheme. The scheme shall be carried out in the states under the supervision of the Revenue Department / Land Records Department which will be the Nodal Department supported by the State Panchayati Raj Department. They also have a technology partner known as the Survey of India (SOI) who shall work in the area of implementation.

Aim

The aim of the scheme is to provide an integrated solution for property validation in rural India. They would make use of the Drone Surveying technology for the demarcation of rural Abadi (inhabited) areas. Many village household owners possess properties in inhabited rural areas which they can use as a financial resource and monetary asset for applying for loans and other monetary benefits from the banks. This scheme is to help them do so by providing the record of rights and to empower them to use their assets to their advantage by the issuance of property cards to the property owners.

Objectives

As mentioned on the government website, the objectives of the scheme are as follows: 

  1. To encourage financial empowerment of the village residents residing in rural India by helping them in receiving loans against their properties and gain other financial benefits.
  2. Creating accurate land records for future rural planning.
  3. To determine the property tax based on the survey and demarcation, which would also lead to tax buildup of the Gram Panchayats (GP) directly in States where it is devolved or else, add to the State exchequer.
  4. Creating survey infrastructure and Geographic Information System (GIS) maps that can later be leveraged by any department for their use.
  5. To use GIS maps and support in the preparation of an improved-quality Gram Panchayat Development Plan (GPDP).
  6. To reduce any legal cases or disputes related to property.

Need

Settlement and record of rights survey of the rural land in India was completed decades ago, however, it missed out on several Abadi areas of villages which were not mapped in many states at the time. This led to a lack of legal recognition for such properties, thereby not allowing their owners to make use of them. Thus this scheme with the help of the latest drone technology and Continuously Operating Reference Station (CORS) technology would help in capturing images and help in the demarcation of the properties. By taking the high-resolution images, topographical mapping can be done thereby enabling the government to create long-lasting records of property ownerships in areas with no legally recognized revenue records.

Coverage

This scheme eventually aims to cover about 6.62 lakh villages in the country over a period of four years. The year 2020-2021 will witness the pilot phase which will extend to six pilot states namely Haryana, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, and Uttarakhand which includes approx. 1 lakh villages and CORS network establishment is planned for two states (Punjab and Rajasthan). The list of villages will be finalized by the respective state governments during the signing of the MoU with the Survey of India (SOI). Further for states which have already conducted the Abadi surveys, their scope will be decided in the second phase.

Stakeholders involved

  • Nodal Ministry (Ministry of Panchayati Raj), Govt of India.  
  • Survey of India SoI (Technology Implementation Agency)  
  • State Revenue Department.
  • State Panchayati Raj department.
  • Local district authorities.
  • Property owner.               
  • Gram Panchayat (GP).
  • National Informatics Centre (NIC) – GIS Division.
  • Other departments having assets in Rural inhabited areas (if any) for preparing a comprehensive database.

Components involved in the implementation flow

Establishment of CORS network 

It is a network of reference stations that will provide a virtual base station and allow access to long-ranging and high accuracy network Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) corrections. It helps in the process of georeferencing, ground-truthing, and land demarcation by establishing ground control points. The activities for establishing CORS will include:

  • Completing the tender process in order to outsource civil construction work;
  • Installing work and commission of the stations;
  • Site selection for CORS stations;
  • Civil construction work by the outsourced agency;
  • Installation and commissioning of CORS stations by the outsourced agency;
  • Establishment of Control Centre and Disaster Recovery (DR) by SoI;
  • Operation and maintenance of CORS Network by SoI;
  • Instruction and capacity development in CORS network-based uses or applications.

Benefits of using CORS

  • Supports in forming ground control points;
  • Could be used by any department/agency for survey, implementation, or using GIS-based applications;
  • Facilitate in using the network for road construction, irrigation works, and infrastructure works, etc;
  • The pilot phase established network will also be used for covering the border areas of other neighbouring states;
  • For phase II, those areas already covered under the network can directly start with the ground survey.

Large Scale Mapping (LSM) using drone

A drone survey will be used for mapping the Abadi area by SOI. It will produce high-resolution and accurate maps. Based on this data, ownership rights will be conferred and property cards will be issued to the rural household owners. To that end, the primary functions include image acquisition, in-depth features extraction, base map generation, getting ground validation and accuracy checks of ORI and digital maps by SoI. Other functions include validating land parcel maps (LPM), creating final LPMs, village maps, and GIS databases. 

The final deliverables (Final maps and GIS database) will then be given to the State Revenue Department and to the State Rural Development/Panchayat Raj Department duly vetted by MoD. The village maps and digital GIS database will be handed over to MoPR (through NIC-GIS division), and Property cards will be issued by the State Authorities/ Revenue Department.

Acquisition of images include:

  • Procurement of Drone by SoI.
  • Taking permissions or clearances for drone flying from Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), Ministry of Defence ( MoD), Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA), etc.
  • Issuing notices to nearby landowners for demarcating the Abadi area.
  • Ground marking the areas of parcels/properties that have to be surveyed using white limestone powder (Chunna) etc.
  • Planning missions before flying the drone with the help of available maps/satellite imagery data which would be done using professional survey grades UAVs.
  • Processing of data acquired through Drones, Data Processing Block Control and Adjustment -AT (Aerial Triangulation)/DEM (Digital Elevation Model) generation and DTM (Digital Terrain Model) processing and ortho-rectified images (ORI).

Feature extraction and base map generation include

  • Using ORI for extraction of topographical features by SOI.
  • Attribute demarcating and extracting features of 2D/3D on the digital map in accordance with state revenue department requirements.
  • Incorporating the attribute information and other secondary information in the database of GIS conforming to the standards of OGC (Open Geospatial Consortium) compliant.
  • Creation of Digital Elevation Model (DEM) and generation of Land Parcel maps of 1:500 scale.
  • Numbering of properties/structures within the Lal Dora area as per the numbering system provided by the State Revenue Department.

Information, Education, and Communication (IEC) activities

This is mainly for spreading awareness among the people of rural areas about the survey methodologies and their benefits. It will include running campaigns, circulation of good practices, and other campaigns on the national level through social media platforms. It is upon the state government to develop a comprehensive communication strategy to sensitize the local population. It can be done through manuals, posters, billboards, flipbooks, role plays, puppet shows, distributing pamphlets, making public announcements in villages, having permanent displays, putting up information walls, and having counters for informing citizens on fixed days. Other methods include:

  • Showcasing short films and good practices on survey and innovation;
  • Sensitization and Mobilisation of Gram Sabha;
  • Using social media, audiovisual media, community radio, special programs/features in television channels;
  • Cultural activities, exhibitions, mobile vans to disseminate information about the survey and its benefits;
  • Having a core group of officers and staff from the States/Union Territories (UTs) who might be sent on exposure visits to other States/UTs who have demonstrated considerable success in implementing the project.

Enhancement of Spatial Planning Application “Gram Manchitra”

In order to support the preparation of the Gram Panchayat Development Plan (GPDP), the digital spatial data created using the drone survey shall be leveraged.

Online monitoring system

It is important to monitor the activities and their progress for which reporting dashboard and online monitoring system will be used.

Program Management Unit

It has two units namely the National Programme Management Unit (NPMU) and State Programme Management Unit (SPMU). These will assist the departmental mechanism in the implementation of the scheme.                                                        

National Programme Management Unit (NPMU)

It will be set up at the National level. It will be for overall management and monitoring of various activities under the scheme and to provide support to States and SOI. They will have appropriate experts with required experience and qualifications from the relevant domain along with some short-term consultants/outsourced professional agencies that may be hired by MoPR.

State Programme Management Unit (SPMU) 

It will be set up at the State level. It will look after the overall management and monitoring of various activities under the scheme and provide support to the State Revenue Department, District officials, GP functionaries, and SOI. They will also have qualified and experienced experts from the relevant domain and along with short-term consultants/outsourced professional agencies that may be hired by the State Revenue Department. 

Survey methodology

Two methods are used for the survey broadly, either through drone or through UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) basing on which large scale mapping is done which itself requires various other projects under different stages. These are:

Pre-survey activities

  • Establishing the CORS network.  
  • Acquiring permission from the Collector’s office for conducting the survey by the regional revenue officer. After permission is granted, the survey area is then notified by the Collector through a public notice.
  • The Panchayati Raj Department organizes a Gram Sabha for the residents of the village for disseminating the survey schedule information and to make them aware of the surveying methodology and its benefits.
  • Carrying out demarcation and identifying different individual properties, assets of  Government, Gram Sabha land parcels, roads, open plots, etc. and ground marking of the areas to be surveyed.
  • SoI takes requisite permission for flying Drones from the Directorate General of Civil Aviation/ Ministry of Defence.
  • Making use of the available maps/satellite imagery to plan missions for flying the drone.

Survey activities

  • SOI will be provided with the scanned maps by the regional revenue office.
  • Before flying, SOI shall check the ground control points.
  • Acquiring aerial images using Professional Survey Grade UAV/ Drone for LSM of rural Abadi area, inhabited areas contiguous to Abadi and wadis/basties in rural areas.
  • Processing of the images captured through drone in the Geographic Information System Lab by SOI.
  • Data processing, base map generation, and 2D feature extraction:
  1. Generating DEM & ORI.
  2. Using ORI to extract 2D topographical features.
  3. Producing LPM at a scale of 1:500 accuracy.
  4. Linking of Attributes with extracted topographical features.
  5. Creating village boundaries.
  6. Using the State Government’s numbering system for numbering the properties/structures within village Abadi area /Lal Dora area for clear identification and demarcation.
  • Creating GIS database.
  • Ground validation of the processed images is better than 10cm accuracy.

Post survey activities

  • State Revenue Department and Gram Panchayat carry out the joint verification of ownership by posting a legal notification.
  • Inquiry Process for ownership adjudication by survey officials to verify the ownership of land parcels with the help of gram sabha, landowners, and review the existing documents.
  • Adjudication of final results will be provided through an issue of notification.
  • Re-verification of the ownership details along with the resolution of objection received post-survey from the owners of the properties which is done by the Enquiry Officer (from the Survey Department).
  • After conducting all the above-mentioned activities, generation of the final Digital maps/ LPM /DEM/ GIS datasets would take place which then will be handed over to MoPR/Authorised agency as per the standard procedure for use.
  • Printing and distribution of the generated property ecards to the respective owners.
  • Making provisions for the proper storage and regular update of records.
  • The property tax and asset register of GP will be regularly updated and the State Revenue Department shall perform and be responsible for regular updation of maps.
  • Training and Capacity building of Revenue Department Government Officials by the SOI.

A broad outline of survey methodology

Legal notification for habited area survey

           ↓                       

Gram Sabha organization

          

Legal notice for a property survey

          

Identification and marking of roads, public spaces, plots, and open areas

      

Delineating property parcels

          

Permission for flying drones by SOI

          

Flying drone for data acquisition

          

Large scale mapping by drone

          ↓ 

Drone data processing

         

Features extractions

         

Ground truthing of captured data and issue of notification for joint verification of ownership

         

Ownership adjudication

         

Issue of notification for providing results of adjudication

         

Generation of final LPM maps, digital maps, GIS databases, and property cards

         

Issuance of property card.

Roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders

Ministry of Panchayati Raj

They deal with :

  • Providing financial structure and resources for the implementation of the scheme at the central level along with monitoring them.
  • The funding for large-scale mapping using drones is provided to the following stakeholders and SOI for establishing the CORS network.
  • State Revenue Department for State Project Management and IEC Activities.
  • NIC for creating spatial analytical tools and to enhance Gram Manchitra application to support the preparation of GPDP, for developing and maintaining monitoring dashboard to report the progress of the scheme.

 Survey of India

  • Implementation of the part of the project pertaining to the processing of images shall be executed on SoI’s premises under its close supervision.
  • SoI will also look after the workspace and if required get the available space modified by the 3rd party in terms of computers/peripherals/servers/data centre.
  • For outsourcing the activities whenever required at different stages under the project, 
  • RFPs/Bids, bids processing, award of work, supervision, quality check, and work execution will all come under the responsibility of SoI as per contract agreement as well as the norms laid down by the Government of India.
  • The activities such as survey planning, execution, and monitoring of survey, and adherence to the norms as laid by the Government of India will be on SoI.
  • SoI will take all permissions for flying drones, vetting of data, and clearances for final classification from DGCA, MoD, MHA, etc.
  • Establishment of CORS along with looking after their operation and regular maintenance for five years.
  • Connecting all CORS with high-quality precision conforming to the standards of SoI’s benchmarks.
  • Acquisition of aerial images using Professional UAV/ Drone for LSM of inhibited rural areas of the state.
  • Post-processing of UAV images shall be carried out by SoI in the GIS lab at SoI regional centre. 
  • Extracting topographical features and processing data on ORI. 
  • Creating a digital spatial library by collecting attributes and linking them with their respective features. This shall be done by SoI in coordination with SPMU.
  • Numbering of the demarcated properties based on the provided numbering system.
  • Ground-Truthing and validating topographical features as generated from ORI
  • Updated LPM shall be generated in prescribed soft copy formats (.shp) and other compatible formats for easy access in GIS and for printing. 
  • Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) compliant GIS database models shall be implemented for the generation of GIS layer data structure for storing spatial and attributable data.
  • Handing over the final deliverables to the MoPR/State authorities duly vetted by MoD.

State Revenue Department

  • In order to grant the format of the property card due authority and validity, the State will carry out suitable modifications to the Land Revenue Code.
  • They also check the extent to which Drone surveys can be carried out and if necessary bring out amendments and modifications in the State Revenue Act to undertake such activities. 
  • They facilitate in conducting activities related to field surveys with support from local authorities for establishing CORS, hiring of vehicles and labours, security equipment, etc.
  • At least one employee from the Revenue Department, GP has to accompany each Drone/ Unmanned Aerial Vehicle flying team, even police department officials as per requirement.
  • Marking with white limestone powder the boundaries of property boundaries with owners and GP before flying off the drone.
  • To facilitate feature extraction as per state requirements to the SoI team.
  • Provide Attribute information for entry and linking in a standardized data collection format.
  • Ground activities for checking  ORI data.
  • Responsible for checking the accuracy of feature data/layer and ensuring correctness of attributes data as supplied to SoI.
  • Issue of notification for providing final results.
  • Finalizing revenue maps and subsequent actions.
  • Training of officials/ functionaries for issuance of property cards in coordination with SoI.
  • Issuance of property cards to villagers.
  • State Governments would manage and maintain the data generated under the scheme viz,   
  1. Property data/maps, LMP maps, and digital data created would be maintained by the State Revenue Department.
  2. Hard copies of the maps created after the Survey would be kept at Gram Panchayats, Tehsil/Taluka Record Centre,  District Record Centres, and State Record Centre.
  • Data Centre Infrastructure available and funded under Digital India Land Records Modernization Programme (DILRMP) scheme of Department of Land Records, Ministry of Rural Development to be utilised for hosting and storing the data created under the scheme.

State Panchayati Raj department

It has to organise the Gram Sabha to inform the schedule of the survey and post-survey details and provides support to spread awareness amongst the villagers about the project work and its benefits leveraging RGSA funds. They also prepare and regularly update the Property (Tax) Register through GPs.

Gram panchayat

They provide help to the Panchayati Raj Department and State Revenue Department for completion of the survey and also sensitize village residents about it. They digitize existing tax registers and make them available for SoI and Enquiry Officer for preparing interim maps/records. They update the tax registers and coordinate for ground-level activities in surveys and help in resolving the disputes raised post-survey.

Property owner

They extend cooperation to the concerned authorities during the process of measurement and survey and producing necessary documents (if available) required for the survey by the authority.

NIC- GIS

They improve the Ministry’s Spatial Planning Application “Gram Manchitra“ efforts by leveraging digital spatial maps for making spatial analytical tools to support the preparation of GPDP. They develop and maintain the centrally hosted online monitoring dashboard and store and host the DEM and GIS database created under the scheme.

State Department of land records

They help in using the available Data Centre Infrastructure at different levels(State/ District/Tehsil).

Joint responsibility (State and Survey of India)

A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) would be signed between SoI and the State Government for the execution of this project. The states that have an existing MoU with SoI, are not required to sign the new MoU. These two authorities together with a complete part of activities, relating to Ground Control Points including densification which shall be done using Ground Control Point library from both departments by SoI. Finally, they also reconcile the data with the records available and finalize the dimension of the land parcel.

Monitoring and evaluation

It shall have a three-layer monitoring and evaluation framework for regular and timely supervision and course corrections. It shall be operative at three levels which are- national, state, and district levels comprising relevant decision-makers and subject matter experts. The three-layer institutional mechanism is as follow: 

National Steering Committee (NSC)

At the national level, we have NSC and NPMU. NSC would be responsible for having an overall oversight, monitoring, and guidance of the program for the smooth operation of the scheme. Their task would be to review progress, grant approval to projects, and Annual Action Plans for the states along with initiating the timely advisory sessions to the states and SoI. Overall they would have a strategic direction, decide on policy-level issues and act as the final authority for approving all such engagements deliverables. They would meet at least once every quarter.

National Programme Management Unit (NPMU)

They will also be set up at the National level for the overall management, monitoring of various activities under the scheme, and providing professional and technical support to states and SoI. They will be working under the supervision of the Member-Secretary of the NSC. They will also have experts from relevant/GIS disciplines and some short-term consultants might be hired too by MoPR.

 Their key national-level activities will include:

  1. Overall implementation and stakeholder coordination.
  2. Assisting states and SoI by signing of MoUs, disbursing funds to states, monitoring of project timelines, etc.
  3. Collaborating with SoI and states to monitor the CORS network establishment using LSM Drone.
  4. Provide functional inputs towards the development and maintenance of the online monitoring and reporting dashboard of the scheme.
  5. Verify and validate the progress of the scheme thereby evaluating its effectiveness.
  6. Cross-State sharing and learning, documentation of good practices.
  7. Coordinate the IEC activities at the national level to mobilize people to participate in drone surveys.

State Steering Committee (SSC)

Their functions are similar to NSC, only that they will be responsible for a specific state. SSC shall look after the overall program oversight and provide guidelines for the smooth implementation of the scheme in the state. Their primary functions are providing operational guidance, reviewing the progress by regular participation in meetings and for vetting the deliverables, and recommending acceptance of deliverables to the NSC. They will monitor the progress and meet at least once every month to monitor progress and approve dashboard updating by the SPMU personnel.

State Programme Management Unit (SPMU)

As the name suggests, these will be set up at the State level for the overall management, monitoring of various activities under the scheme, and supporting the State Revenue Department, District officials, GP functionaries, and SoI. The Member-Secretary of the SSC shall be supervising their work and they shall report to him. They will also hire experts from the field and might hire short-term consultants or outsource professionals as and when required. Their state-level activities will include:

  • Managing the day-to-day program management activities.
  • Keeping track of project progress and keeping the important stakeholders informed about the project progress and providing handholding support to SoI and State Department.
  • Provide support by submitting reports of the progress of LSM to the State Revenue Department.
  • Gathering the attribute information and other secondary information to be incorporated in the GIS database.
  • Support the ground-truthing of maps and facilitate the signing of MoU between State and Survey of India.
  • Monitoring the implementation timelines and regularly updating the Monitoring Dashboard of Scheme for giving progress reports.

District Monitoring and Review Committee (DMRC)

DMRC is established at the district level and has to meet at least once a month to review and check the progress of implementation of the Programme, whose report will then be submitted by the District Collector/Deputy Commissioner to the SSC. Also, the Committee would be responsible for monitoring and oversight of the IEC funds granted.

They will also have an online monitoring dashboard that will be regularly updated. Further, the property data and the map data will be updated by the respective states in the future.

Conclusion

For the success of the plan, it needs to have an effective implementation which can only happen if the state and the Centre are willing to cooperate and coordinate. With an undivided focus, the scheme could benefit several areas such as the village households, the gram panchayats, the states for conducting welfare policies, drone industry, boosting the employment sector and other economic sectors, etc. It sure will have its own challenges such as the extent of data collection, its monetisation, data protection issues, different laws in different states, having maximum coverage of the villages, etc. However, with dedicated collaboration, they might as well find a solution to it.

References


Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Prerequisites for drafting an e-policy for social media platforms

0

This article is written by Raghav Madan, pursuing a Diploma in Advanced Contract Drafting, Negotiation, and Dispute Resolution from Lawsikho.

Introduction 

Social media platforms as we all know are the pinnacle in today’s era and are widely used for diverse purposes whether its entertainment or business. Our everyday functioning revolves around social media platforms both positively and negatively. Having said that, these social media platforms also need to provide a framework of this functioning which is particularly through a policy (or an e-policy when provided electronically). A policy or an e-policy is simply a document that contains instructions that determine how work is carried out in the platform. It clearly defines modes of conduct, reflects the platform’s roles, and determines the cultural structure of a platform. It is important to note that policies differ from one platform to another. The content of a policy depends on the mission and objectives of an organization. Typically, in the social media domain, an e-policy contains answers to the questions like what is the role of a particular social media in technical terms, how are the users supposed to interact in that platform, what are the obligations of each user who is a part of that platform, what happens to the collected data of users, etc. 

Why is having an e-policy important?

Before going deep into the prerequisites of drafting an e-policy, it is very important to first understand the reason behind drafting an e-policy. The main reason why we need such a policy revolves around setting out responsibilities in a written format. The responsibility to set out what are the roles of each individual connected to that platform and what are their rights and duties leading to better accountability. Further, it also aims to educate people about social media platforms in a better manner and formulate trust. It minimizes costly & protracted risks in order to maximize legal, regulatory & organizational compliance. Now that we have understood the intention behind framing these policies, we shall now discuss a few key points one should keep in mind before drafting an e-policy for social media platforms.

  • The grip of diverse laws in relation to Social Media:

Logically, before drafting any legal document one needs to know the legal facets around it. Here is the list of laws from the Indian perspective that one shall have expertise in before drafting an e-policy:

  1. The Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules 2021 is arguably the most important law in the social media industry today. It aims to empower ordinary users of social media platforms with a mechanism for redressal and timely resolution of their grievance with the help of a Grievance Redressal Officer (GRO) who should be a resident in India.
  2. Indian Contract Act, 1872 along with Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008: because these policies are broadly a contract governing the relationship between the user and the platform under Indian Contract Act, 1872 and validated under Section 10A of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.
  3. Intellectual Property Rights Laws for providing protection to the original creator of content and what action the creator can take in case of infringement which has been discussed are discussed later. Various legislations in this regard include The Patents Act, 1970, Copyright (Amendment) Rules, 2021, The Trade Marks Act, 1999, and Copyright Act, 1957.
  4. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for the procedure for civil disputes and resolution mechanism which forms an integral part of any contract.
  5. Data Protection laws as these platforms collect data worldwide and require the prior consent of the user for using the data. Although India does not have proper legislation in this regard yet, however, it is important that if the personal data is being collected from other jurisdictions, then ensuring due compliance to their data protection law is to be given high priority considering the penalties has for non-compliance.

This list is not limited and varies depending upon the nature of working of the social media platform. Further, if these platforms work in multiple jurisdictions then they are required to abide by the laws of each respective jurisdiction.

  • Inclusion of Different Forms of Policies:

Each Social Media Platform shall incorporate a list of policies which could be in the form of:

a. Terms of Service 

Terms of service (also known as terms of use and terms and conditions, commonly abbreviated as TOS or ToS, ToU or T&C) are the legal agreements between the platform and the user who wants to use that service. The user must agree to abide by the terms of service in order to use the offered service. 

b. Privacy policy 

A privacy policy is a statement or legal document that discloses some or all of the ways a party gathers, uses, discloses, and manages a customer or client’s data in order to protect the users of the platform.

c. Business policy

A business Policy would provide information regarding the ads, branded content, commerce, community payments, etc., and how the business works (unless it is confidential information).

d. Intellectual Property policy

An Intellectual Property Policy will tend to protect the individual user and prohibit activities such as posting, sharing, or sending any content that violates or infringes someone else’s copyrights, trademarks, or other intellectual property rights.

Apart from the above-mentioned policies, any other policy may also be included provided it forms an integral part of the working of the platform.

  • Drafting a provision for the applicability of the e-policy:

As we have already discussed that the Indian Contract Act, 1872 governs all agreements and contracts, including online contracts. Simply put, a contract is a legally binding agreement. The fundamentals to forming this legally binding contract are addressed in Section 10 which also states that the parties shall be identified and applied correctly. 

Therefore, it is essential to provide the applicability of these e-policies. It includes:

a. Specifying the scope of jurisdiction;

b. Individuals the policy is applicable to; 

c. Category or individuals it is not applicable to or any other exemptions;

d. And what are the conditions upon which it will become applicable.

It is ideal to provide this provision at the beginning of any e-policy itself and clarify as to whom this policy is relevant.

  • Importance of drafting a provision governing relationship (User and Platform):

This is another important aspect of any e-policy. This provision shall state what is the relationship between the platform and the user. It should also contain conditions (if any) under which such a relationship shall become effective. As a form of illustration, it can be drafted in the following manner.

“This policy governs the relationship and serves as an agreement between the user and the platform by which you may access and use the Platform and our related websites, services, applications, products and content (collectively, the ‘Services’).”

This provision is important in order to define the scope of the relationship. Ideally, this provision is included at the beginning of the Terms of Service.

  • Acceptance of the Terms

Acceptance is an integral component of forming a binding agreement. However, while contracting with social media platforms, there could be millions of users who may want to avail the services of these platforms. Individually drafting a contract for each user would be a mounting task for any platform. As a result, these platforms have standard terms which the users have to accept in order to form a binding agreement. This is called a Clip-Wrap Contract. It can be drafted in the following manner:

“By accessing or using our Services, you confirm that you can form a binding contract that you accept the terms of our e-policy and that you agree to comply with them.”

This information should be provided to the user while creating an account itself where the user will have an option to agree or disagree with the conditions. Clicking on “I agree” will imply that the user has given the acceptance is bound by the terms of the Privacy Policy.

  • Collection of Personal Data

This is probably the most important aspect that social media platforms need to keep in mind while drafting an e-policy. As of now, there is no formal legislation that governs personal data protection in India. 

Regardless, each platform has to provide full information regarding the data it collects of its users especially if they offer services to users from all over the world since there are laws prevalent in other jurisdictions in this regard.

The platform has to provide:

  1. Data it collects from users;
  2. Data it collects from other sources;
  3. Purpose of collecting the data;
  4. Data shared with any third party and for what purpose;
  5. Consent for sharing the data;
  6. Storage of the data;
  7. How can a user opt-out of this data collection;
  8. Whom to approach in case of a grievance.

These points need to be given due importance considering the heavy penalties for non-compliance it can have in respect to Personal data protection laws. In Europe, the General Data Protection Rules allow the Data Protection Authority to issue fines up to 20 million pounds.  

In addition, if the terms of service allow minors to use the platform, then the platforms should also comply with the information collected from the minors.

For reference, you can check out TikTok’s Privacy Policy for Young Users.

  • Obligations of the users

There must be a provision in e-policy (generally in Terms of Service) that provides obligations of each user. This includes posting sensitive content, sexual content, promotion cyberbullying, etc.

These obligations shall provide the users with what they are supposed to do and what to avoid. It should also provide the acts for which users would be liable individually and the platform will take no accountability. This should be included in the Terms of Service. For the purpose of reference, you can check out Instagram’s obligations from the users.

  • Obligations of the platform

Similar to the obligations of the users, the e-policy should also provide obligations of the Platform. This includes laying down the grounds and process to take down sensitive content for a user, using the personal data of users for a lawful purpose, providing a detailed description as to how the platform functions, providing reasonable protection to the content of the users, etc.

There shall be a clear provision stating what will be the obligations of the platform towards its users and when shall it be effective which should be covered descriptively under the privacy policy.

This can either be specified through a clause or through segregated sections of the privacy policy as provided by LinkedIn

LinkedIn has no specific clause as to what are the obligations of the platform but in separate sections has laid down what shall the platform do with the user’s data, what is method it uses to enable communication, what are laws it complies with, etc. 

  • Intellectual Property Rights

Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) are very important in the domain of social media platforms. The platform must prohibit posting, sharing, or sending any content that violates or infringes someone else’s copyrights, trademarks, or other intellectual property rights.

There must be a provision that:

a. Prohibits the IPR infringements;

b. Provides the steps users can take to remove the copied post;

c. Provides notification of the infringement;

d. Provides actions against false claims;

e. Provide what steps the platform can undertake to take against the infringement.

This is such an essential provision in the social media domain that platforms like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok have a separate e-policy tab for these. One way of framing it is the way Facebook has done through its Intellectual Property Policy.

  • Other key points:

a. As discussed, e-policy on social media platforms can be of various forms such as Terms of Service, Privacy Policy, Business Policy, Intellectual Property Policy, etc. One may choose to include all these policies within one section named “e-policy”.Alternatively, one can also choose to segregate these policies under different tabs. Generally, the segregation method is more commonly used as it leads to a better comprehension of the text. Including all such types of policies within one comprehensive e-policy would make the policy very bulky and non-readable. 

b. These policies should be easy to locate on the platform and shall have a hyperlink attached to it at the time of the user creating the account itself.

c. The e-policy should be well formatted without the presence of any ambiguity and should not contain too much technical jargon. This will ensure every individual is able to read the policies with ease.

d. The working of the platform must not have an adverse effect on society. For example, in April 2019 the madras High court passed the order directing the state government to prohibit the downloading of the Tik Tok App and called it dangerous for children. The Government of India banned it on 29 June 2020 calling it to be prejudicial to the sovereignty and integrity of India, security of a state, and public order. This act of banning has been done under Section 69A of the information technology act read with the provisions of Information Technology (Procedure and Safeguards for Blocking of Access of Information by Public) Rules 2009.

Conclusion

While the drafting of each social media platform depends upon the nature of working of that platform. However, certain points remain in common and should not be ignored, especially that related to data collection and processing of the user. Moreover, one should also keep in mind to provide the obligations of the users as well as the platform just like in any other contract as it forms the essence of a legal document. We also discussed how due consideration should be given to Intellectual Property Rights considering most of the legal issues in the social media domain revolves around protection to the original creator amongst other things. And lastly, we discussed a few common practices one should keep in mind while drafting an e-policy which the giants of the industry have followed for years and have remained intact which can be included while drafting a crisp and concise e-policy.


Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

The FBI and Public Law : how is FBI circumventing laws by hiring Japanese third parties to hack phones

0

This article is written by Gitika Wadhwani from Jagran Lakecity University. This article deals with the FBI and Public Law about the San Bernardino case. 

Introduction

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the U.S intelligence agency that has worked for protecting the security of the state and civil liberties of its people whenever it’s been threatened by any criminal or terrorist act, has been in controversy with Apple Inc. owing to the San Bernardino case, a shooter attack in which fourteen people were killed. The FBI seized the phone belonging to San Bernardino (the shooter) and a search was to be conducted which was not possible due to security features and encryption features on the iPhone. FBI issued a warrant ordering Apple to assist the FBI by reducing its security feature and removing auto-erasing data function after several manual attempts. However, Apple refused to assist, saying it will threaten the security of its customers. The FBI hired a third party to hack the device and completed the search.  

The FBI and Public Law – long found friends 

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is a federal agency responsible for the investigation of the violation of federal civil rights and for long has helped the people in the U.S to protect their civil rights. The agency deals with the investigation of hate crimes, the color of law violations, and Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act violations. The Public Law of the United States comprises its Constitution which prescribes the civil liberties of people and the foundation of the federal government. To function effectively, the federal agency deals with various aspects of Public Law and protects the civil liberties of people. The FBI, being the federal agency, looks after the security of the United States and protects its people and country from any criminal or terrorist act. The Public Law provides power to the FBI to investigate crimes against the state and authorizes the funds for carrying out the functions; the Federal Bureau of Investigation receives its authority from the provisions of Public Law

The federal law under the U.S. Code authorizes the attorney to appoint officials to detect crimes against the United States. The FBI has special powers to make arrests, carry firearms, and serve warrants. Also, the FBI agents are empowered to make seizures under the warrant if there is a violation of federal statutes. The authority and functions of the FBI can be refereed from various statutes. These are as follows:

  1. Authority to investigate criminal violations;
  2. Power to investigate violations of state law on request by an appropriate state official in limited circumstances such as felony killings of state law enforcement officials, violent crimes against interstate travelers, and serial killers;
  3. Investigative and other responsibilities of the FBI;
  4. Authority to investigate threats to national security.

This wide range of powers given to the FBI makes it unique to address the issues related to both national security and criminal threats and using its intelligence tools to collect the information. The FBI can work flexibly by collecting data through its intelligence covering all the aspects of the subject matter and using this information to carry out its search, seizure, and arrest if it appears that there is an imminent danger to the state or innocent person. FBI and Public Law can be said to be the long-found friends as it carries out the function of Public Law to protect the state and its constitution and in absence of any statute, large powers are bestowed upon the FBI to act for the national security of the country. 

The concept of ethical hacking 

Before understanding ethical hacking, let’s understand ethics and hacking separately. Ethics in normal terms is something that is not wrong, that is authorized and not against the moral and sometimes legal principles, and hacking in simple words is gaining access to someone’s data that might be authorized or unauthorized. 

Ethical hacking is an intrusion into a network or system to identify the threats or security vulnerabilities that an attacker or a black hat hacker may try to exploit to benefit themselves or cause loss to the person whose data is hacked. Any device, such as a smartphone, computer, network, etc. containing data or documents can be stolen and misused by the hacker. To prevent this loss or threat, a proactive approach is taken by ethical hackers to test and ensure network security and find the potential holes that can be corrected timely to prevent the system from malicious hackers.  

What to do before and after a cybersecurity breach?

Before cybersecurity breach

  1. Try to identify the uncovered spots that the hacker could target and all other risks. 
  2. Prone and the attack surface try to minimize it by protecting the known vulnerabilities that can be targeted.
  3. Mitigate your risk by engaging teams who have capabilities to detect the risk, use control measures such as encryption, intrusion detection, or hardware or software. 
  4. Try to create strong passwords that are difficult to crack using upper case, lower case, symbols, and numbers.
  5. Try to create different passwords for different accounts so that in case one account is hacked the other remains protected. 
  6. Be careful when you fill out your details on any random site.

After cybersecurity breach

In case an intruder can get unauthorized access to your device by breaking all the security passcodes, the following steps must be taken:

  1. If the breach could result in any access to your financial accounts and data, communicate with your financial institutions about the breach.
  2. Change all the passwords linked to the accounts that can be at the risk.
  3. You can use the credit freeze option so that no one can borrow anything using your identity.
  4. Identity the information or stolen data to understand the severity of the situation.
  5. Contact the company or a cybersecurity help desk to track the hacker.
  6. Do not take help from random companies that can be a social engineering attack. 

Apple to FBI – “you cannot force us to hack the San Bernardino iPhone”

In 2015, Syed Rizwan Farook and Tashfeen Malik perpetrated an attack on a holiday party at Farook’s office in San Bernardino. Fourteen people were killed, to conceal information from law enforcement agencies, they erased all the information from phones and smashed all the devices. Only one iPhone was found undestroyed, the phone was seized and the FBI attempted to get into the phone but was not able to get access to it because of the iOS 9 feature that would erase the data after a certain number of attempts. 

The FBI tried to take help from Apple by asking to build a passcode bypass system for the bureau but Apple refused by saying that it would decrease the security feature of iPhones. Despite several attempts and orders by the court, Apple denied assisting the FBI as it would create a threat to the security of customers. 

The debate between the FBI and Apple was mainly around privacy, security, and encryption. The FBI, on one hand, needed the assistance of Apple to investigate the phone of the suspect in the San Bernardino case. Whereas, Apple denied removing the security features of the iPhone operating system stating that it will threaten the privacy of customers. 

The motion of Apple seeking the court to reverse the order to assist the FBI in search created a controversy. The argument that removing the security features would threaten the privacy and security of people is not true. The FBI did not want Apple to give any new operating system that could be copied but only to install it on the suspecting phone which would make it easy for the FBI to crack the encryption. In no way, it would affect normal people or customers of Apple. The FBI was not going to use it for every single person to keep a check on them but only one who is a suspect and there is a probable reason that there is a threat or information related to a criminal act. So, to protect the country and its security the company must assist the FBI. 

The FBI had hired a third party to gain access to an iPhone that was linked to the San Bernardino shooting and was able to hack the phone which raised concern to Apple that it would result in a security compromise. 

Many big tech giants supported Apple including Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, Google, and eBay, and also academicians, activists stood by the company. There was a huge debate over the matter of whether the company is legally bound to forsake its security and can be compelled to create a backdoor for its encryption policy. 

All Writs Act

All Writs Act is the federal statute of the United States which gives authority to the federal courts to issue all writs in absence of any specific statute whenever necessary and consistent with principles of law. 

Following the FBI versus Apple controversy, the USA government approached the court to issue an order to Apple Inc. to provide written passcode for non-encryption barriers and auto-erase function after several wrong attempts for assisting the search of an iPhone that was found in the San Bernardino shooting. Apple’s assistance will help the government to determine the passcode without non-encryption features that have been coded into its operating system. 

The FBI seeks software image files that will help them disable the auto-erase function if enabled, and it will also be able to submit passcodes for testing electronically the subject device. This residual authority of the court can be inferred from the All Writs Act which provides power to the court to issue orders whenever necessary to protect the principles of law and when there is no other statute.

The government, by using a search warrant under Provisions of federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, can collect the evidence but in this case, the evidence could not be collected because of the encryption and security features of the phone. The only way is if Apple removes the security feature and there is no specific statute under which a warrant can be issued therefore, the court is justified in using the All Writs Act. This statute has been used by the courts several times to gain access to devices to protect security and prevent criminal acts. 

Conclusion 

Individual rights and privacy are essential features of democracy, but when it comes to national security the role of intelligence agencies becomes crucial. They must gather information by collecting data and conducting a search as it deems appropriate. When only certain people who are suspected or are a threat to national security are targeted and their devices are being hacked or asked to be unlocked it is no violation of the privacy of customers. 

FBI being the central agency is empowered to carry out its investigation with the help of other functionaries to protect the people and state against violation of various areas of Public Law. The authority given to the FBI makes it unique to address national security and criminal threats. Therefore, it can conduct the investigation, use its intelligence tools as well as arrest and prosecute the ones who are a threat to the people and state.

References 


Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals, and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

 

 

Download Now
logo
FREE & ONLINE 3-Day Bootcamp (LIVE only) on

How Can Experienced Professionals Become Independent Directors

calender
28th, 29th Mar, 2026, 2 - 5pm (IST) &
30th Mar, 2026, 7 - 10pm (IST).
Bootcamp starting in
Days
HRS
MIN
SEC
Abhyuday AgarwalCOO & CO-Founder, LawSikho

Register now

Abhyuday AgarwalCOO & CO-Founder, LawSikho