career in intellectual property law
Image Source - http://revenueconsultant.com/2017/04/24/why-do-you-need-to-protect-your-intellectual-property/

 

Written by Aman Bhardwaj, pursuing Diploma in Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Laws as part of his coursework.  Aman is a 3rd year student of law, pursuing his degree course on B. A. LLB from NMIMS Kirit P Mehta School of Law, Mumbai.

Obtaining an “international patent” is a solution to many problems that currently fails to exist in the present world. In other words, there is no single world organization that will provide patent rights to all countries with a single application. Owning a patent to one’s innovation is an expensive process especially when it comes to obtain the patent in different jurisdictions of the world. The closest solution to the idealization of an international patent is to file an international patent application via the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and Paris convention available to residents or nationals of all member countries or contracting states subscribing to the PCT and Paris convention.

Before taking a patent the inventor taking the patent should be aware of its business area restriction, for example if Indian company were selling in Australia and UK, then it would apply for patent protection in Australia and UK respectively because it will reduce the additional cost conferred upon it and will also be pocket friendly to the patent holder. Another great option is to take patent via PCT which will be beneficial for the holder if he wants to hold the patent in more than 3 countries, Paris convention that comprises of 146 and 174 members respectively, provided, to see that the main jurisdiction country should be a member of these convention and treaties.

Patent Filing Internationally

Filing under PCT

The PCT is an international treaty that helps to simplify the tiresome process of filing patent applications in different and several countries. PCT is administered by WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization). As on 1st March 2016, the WIPO was holding a total of 148 contracting states to the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).

The PCT patent application has two phases: namely International and National. The National Phase walks behind the International Phase and consists of processing the application in the Patent Office of specific countries following the same procedure as processing a national application entry in India.

The PCT allows seeking patent protection for an invention concurrently in a large number of countries by filing a single “international” patent application instead of filing several separate national or regional patent applications. The patent granting procedure remains under the control of the national or regional patent offices, known as the “National Phase”. Acquiring patent under PCT is considered to be the most preferable form. Following procedure is followed for acquiring patent under PCT:

1. Filing

First step is to file an international application with a national or regional patent Office or World Intellectual Property Organization, in accordance with all the PCT formality requirement, in single language, and set amount of fees should also be paid. The PCT application should be first filed with the receiving office (RO) i.e. Indian Patent Office (IPO) for India, which further transfers the PCT application to the International Bureau (IB), WIPO, Geneva. There are many important elements, which need to be present in the application such as request, description, claims, drawing, translations etc. But, the most important elements which need to be there in a PCT application filed from INDIA is that there should be –

  • Name of the invention/Title
  • Name of the applicant/His or her nationality/ Address
  • There should be a preamble of the description of the invention (most important)
  • All the claims with signature at the last page of the application

These quintessential elements should be there in the PCT application filed from India at the patent office otherwise the patent application would have a greater chance for rejection or revision. If some objections are raised on the application, then the applicant is given a time of 12 months to rectify and amend the application. If, the applicant does not comply with the stipulated time then the application is treated to be dismissed otherwise accepted.

2. International Search

Second step is that an “International searching authority” (ISA) (one of the world’s major authority) identifies the published patent documents and technical literature (“prior art”) which may have an impact on whether your invention is patentable or not, and also a written opinion is given on your invention’s ability for patentability. This is the most important step in the series of obtaining patent under PCT. The competent ISA authority in India is INDIAN PATENT OFFICE (IN).

3. International Publication

The last step commences immediately after the termination of 18 months from the initial filing date and then the quantum of your international application is revealed to the world.

Grounds For Opposition

Once the patent application has been filed, several oppositions that shall arise has to be resolved by the applicant. The following are the grounds of opposition.  

  1. The patent is wrongfully obtained and has used wrong ways to obtain the patent
  2. The patent is under a subject of prior publication
  3. The invention is publically known and used beforehand the date of that claim
  4. There is inventive step involved
  5. The invention is very obvious and common
  6. The subject does not fulfill the condition of an “invention” under the act
  7. There has been wrong mentioning of the facts and material used for the invention
  8. The application was not made within 12 months from the date of first application.

These are the grounds, which can be held very critical in opposition of the application. The applicant or its agent or his legal representative should take good care of these grounds.

In the case of “Ten Xc Wireless Inc & Anr vs Mobi Antenna Technologies“, The Delhi High court has very well established the process of filing an application under PCT and also the importance of PCT model of patent protection.

National Phase

As discussed above international phase is followed by the national phase for obtaining patent under PCT.

  1. After the international search or preliminary examination i.e. after the expiration of the PCT procedure, applications for the grant of patents can be applied before the national (or regional) patent offices of the countries in which patent protection is desired before
  2. 30/31 months from the priority date
  3. The further procedures of filing, fee and processing are done as per the demands of national law in relation to patents in each country.
  4. International filing date is the initial filing date in all such countries.

National phase in India

A national phase application is to be filed before the termination of 31 months from the priority date of the application for vouchsafe of patent in India. The international application, which is filed under PCT, serves as a corresponding application in India.

Where to file a National Phase PCT Patent Application in India

Delhi, Kolkata, Chennai and Mumbai are the 4 located offices in India from where application of the patent can be registered, relying upon the domicile, business or place of the person filing the application. i.e. the Applicant. The nearest located office will automatically serve as the appropriate office to file the patent application. For ex. – If a person from Rajasthan wants to file a patent application, then he has to file the application in the Delhi patent office.

Paris Convention (Direct Filing)

International treaty of the Paris convention allows the applicants to file the application in their home country first or the desired country. It can be considered as an alternative to the PCT application. The application for the patent is known as “priority document” and the date on which the same is filed is known as the “priority date”.

The priority document mentioned above starts a 12-month period in which a further application called as Paris Convention Application can be filed anywhere. The extent that the content of the Paris Convention application is disclosed in the earlier priority document, it will be backdated to the priority date. Direct filing is only an option when the applicant wants to protect his/her invention in the non-PCT countries such as Argentina, Taiwan or Venezuela. Direct filing may also be considered as it ensures faster examination and ideally faster approval and quick grants from the authority

The benefit of obtaining patent through the way of Paris Convention is that the 12-month convention period allows the applicant to seek funding, perform market research and turn an idea into a commercial product. All of these can be done following a single filing without risking a loss of rights in other countries. Addition to this is that, filing a patent under the Paris convention is more pocket friendly that filing a patent under PCT.

Why Paris Convention?

  1. Paris Convention is very suitable for the applicant who has a tight budget and need the patent protection soon and if translations are not involved, one may be able to file three or even more Paris Convention applications for the cost of a PCT application.
  2. Paris Convention route is also helpful in dealing with the countries where the respective country is not a signatory to the PCT for example in the case of country like Argentina, Taiwan or Pakistan. Many eastern and African countries like Jordan and Ethiopia respectively are also not signatory to the PCT and many industries like steel, coal etc. requires patent for their work, which is achieved by the direct filing only.
  3. If an applicant wants the patent in the maximum no. of the countries then he/she should sensibly take into account both the routes for overall economic growth for his/her business

International Patent protection by Indian Applicant

Section 39 of Indian Patent Act, 1970 restricts a person to apply for an international patent protection without the prior permission of the controller. A person seeking international patent should first abide by the Section 39 of the act and make an application to the national office first requesting them to give permission to seek international patent and only after the prior permission the applicant can seek any of the 2 routes i.e. PCT or Paris convention (Already discussed above) if he/she wants to protect his/her patent in more than one country. 2 exceptions are also discussed on the Section 39 of the act which allows the applicant to directly ally to protection outside India without any permission by only to the extend to those 2 exception provided in Section 39(1)(a) and Section 39(1)(b). Once permission is granted, then any of the 2 routes can be selected and the application process of any of the 2 routes can be initiated according to the needs of protection which includes- The country in which the protection is needed, financial condition of the applicant, time limit, paper work etc.

If the applicant wants to protect his/her patent in only one country than he/she can directly file a patent protection application in the Patent office of that particular country after the permission of the controller mentioned in Sec 39 of the act. All the rules and regulation of the respective country than will be applicable to the application and the specific format of the country will be followed in filing the application.

Outcoming And Insights

The PCT is an agreement by many countries in the regard of patent protection. It is considered as one of the most significant model in international cooperation after the adoption of the Paris Convention itself. Though we have seen many advantages of PCT model but on an in-depth research, some problems/outcomes can be observed which needs to eliminate to make this model toxin free. The outcomes observed by me are –

  1. The PCT does not provide clear power separation between its National and International phases for the grant of “international patents”: the main power and responsibility for granting the patent to the applicant remains with the patent offices (designated office) of the respective countries where the national application is sought to be filed. In India the patent application can be filed at Delhi office, Mumbai office, Kolkata office or Chennai office. If the national or regional offices reject the application, even if the international authority has accepted it, the application remains cancelled. This implies that though PCT model has an international filing and national filing differently, the absolute power remains with the national authority only and international authority acts as a watchdog.
  2. PCT includes national phase: the application has to go through each designated or elected states and thus the criteria changes from state to state and hence the specification has to be amended as per the requirements of the designated /elected states, but PCT allows only one specification with the International application. This increases the unnecessary workload on the authorities of different states, which are not bound by the initial examination of the international authority, and thus there are duplication of work for different states according to their rules and laws.
  3. There is no system or mechanism to check and control the amount and the quality of the research done for the international examination report, as a consequence of which there is no check and balance to the quality of research and can further result in poor or lack of research in terms for granting patent and can be disastrous. It will also increase the workload also at the national office or can result ion granting of broad patents, which can prove to be a great problem to the third party as well.
  4. Another major problem or drawback of PCT model observed is the length of time taken by the authorities to grant patent. The authorities conducts research on the application by the applicant at the international as well as national level and due to that the time taken by the authorities is greater as compared to other platforms of patent approval. This further results in long period of uncertainty for the third party.

These limitations need to be curbed down to make the PCT model more effective and easy for the people to protect their patent internationally.

Conclusion

It is evident from the analysis that patent is granted not for the idea, however, outstanding it may be, but for the novel, useful and inventive way of carrying it out. Patent law pre-requisites an invention to be new, inventive and most importantly no obvious and capable of industrial application for attracting protection. An invention is said to be new if it has no been anticipated by publication in any document or used in the country or elsewhere in the world before the date of filing of the patent application, i.e. the subject matter has not fallen in public domain or does not form part of the “state of the art”.  An invention, after the publication, becomes the patentee’s sole property for twenty years.

Obtaining a patent internationally is very essential in modern times as the market of piracy and duplicity are increasing expeditiously. There is no single platform in the world that can give the patent on any innovation or improvement globally but very close to this ideal situation is obtaining a patent through PCT, which is also referred as the most effective way of gaining patent worldwide. PCT application acts as a single window process and allows for one time searching and preliminary examination at the International stage. This eliminates the need for national patent offices to conduct search individually. This reduces time and money.

PCT application delays the process for obtaining a patent, as the application needs to enter specific national offices considerably. For most countries, application to enter a national phase need not be made before 30 months from the date of priority. If a national application was filed instead of a PCT, a decision must be made within 12 months from the first filing. It is also evident from the research a country’s market economy is also dependent upon the working of a successful patent system.

 

Students of Lawsikho courses regularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills. These national and international filings and registrations of all sorts of Intellectual property are taught in the Diploma in Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Laws, intended for those who want to understand intellectual property laws and media and entertainment industry more deeply.

Did you find this blog post helpful? Subscribe so that you never miss another post! Just complete this form…

LEAVE A REPLY