Download Now
Home Blog Page 1761

Prevention Of Oppression And Mismanagement Of A Company

0

download (33)

In this blogpost, Sonal Srivastava, Student, Amity Law School, Lucknow, writes about the provisions relating to prevention of oppression and mismanagement of a company.

Chapter XVI of the Companies Act, 2013 deals with the provisions relating to prevention of oppression and mismanagement of a company. Oppression and mismanagement of a company mean that the affairs of the company are being conducted in a manner that is oppressive and biased towards the minority shareholders or any member or members of the company. To prevent the same, there are provisions for the prevention and mismanagement of a company.

Application to tribunal for relief in cases of oppression, etc

According to section 241, any member of the company who complains that the affairs of the company are being conducted in a manner that is prejudicial to public interest or in a manner prejudicial or oppressive to him or any material change that is being brought about by, or in the interests of, any creditors, including debenture holders or any  class shareholders of the company etc. that would materially affect the management of the company and would make its affairs prejudicial to public interests or any of its member or class of members, may make an application to the tribunal in accordance with the provisions of section 244 of the Act.

The central government may also make an application to the tribunal for its orders where it thinks that the affairs of the company are prejudicial to public interest.

Powers of Tribunal

Under section 242 of the Act, the Tribunal has the power to order for the regulation of the conduct of affairs of the company in future, the purchase of shares, restriction on the transfer of the share, termination, setting aside or modification of any agreement, setting aside of any transfer, delivery of goods, payment, execution or other act relating to property, removal of managing director, manager, or any of the directors of the company, recovery of undue gains made by any managing director, manager or director during the period of his appointment as such, imposition of costs as may be deemed fit.

A certified copy of the order shall be filed with the registrar within 30 days of the order by the tribunal.

Any contravention of the provisions of this chapter shall lead company towards the imposing of fine which shall not be less than 10 lakh rupees and which may extend to 25 lakh rupees and every officer of the company who is in default shall be punished with an imprisonment of six months and with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees and which may extend to one lakh rupees.

Consequences of termination or modification of certain agreement

If an order of the tribunal set asides, modifies or terminates any ongoing agreement then as per the provisions of section 243 of the Act, such an action shall not give rise to any claims against any director or any person of the company for compensation for damages, etc. Any director, managing director, etc who has been terminated from the post as per the orders of the tribunal shall not hold the office of the same before the expiry of a period of five years from the order of the tribunal.

Right to apply under section 241

According to section 244 of the Act, the following people can apply for the orders from the tribunal-

  1. In the case of a company having share capital of not less than one hundred members of the company or not less than one-tenth of the total number of its members, whichever is less, or any member or members holding not less than one- tenth of the issued share capital of the company, subject to the condition that the applicant or applicants has or have paid all calls, and other sums due on his or their shares.
  2. In the case of a company not having a share capital, not less than one- fifth of the total number of its members.

Section 245 of the act talks about class action suits, wherein the class of members having a similar cause of action can file an application before the tribunal to seek necessary orders.

Conclusion

The prevention and oppression of mismanagement of a company is required so that there is no prejudice towards the public interest and there is no biasness towards the minority shareholders. Thereby the Act incorporates the wide provisions for the same so that there is smooth functioning of the companies, as well as the interest of all the shareholders, is put to forth.

 

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/joinchat/J_0YrBa4IBSHdpuTfQO_sA

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content. 

 

 

Download Now

Laws For The Protection Of Trade Secrets In India

0

top-secret-1076813_960_720

In this blogpost, Vernita Jain, Student, National Law Institute University, Bhopal, writes about what is a trade secret, relation between trade secrets and TRIPS, Laws which protect trade secrets and what are the remedies available in India.

What is a trade secret?

Information or the fact can be considered a trade secret when such information cannot be used in common in the industry to obtain an advantage over its competitors. The information that is said to be a trade secret should not be readily ascertainable. Over the years, the importance of trade secret in the sphere of intellectual property has increased to a level beyond protection through patents. Treaties like North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPs; Art. 39) governs the law relating to the protection of trade secret.

It is universally important that the information that is to be guarded as a trade secret must be kept ‘secret’. The extent to which such fact or the information is known to the outside world, how much of such information is known to the employees and the risk of having such information in the hands of the competitors are the most important factors to determine the trade secret.

However, it is only the effects of breach of confidence in the legal contracts or breach of trust that are protected. There is no particular law with which  trade secrets can’t be protected, as they are secrets but they can surely be protected by various others laws such as criminal law, the laws governing employee/employer relations and fiduciary obligations, unfair competition law and contract law. If a producer or a company reveals information to a third party that is a trade secret, it is very important that the party should have made an agreement that includes of what constitutes a trade secret and who owns that proprietary material.

Trade Secrets and TRIPS

At the GATT negotiations, it was declared that if anyone uses information that is ‘confidential’ for another party, such a person would be held liable for Unfair Practice. With the view of fulfilling the above objective, S. 39 of the TRIPS says that information that is to be treated as a trade secret can be protected under Article 10bis of the Paris Convention.

It is the duty of all the members of the company to protect undisclosed information from commercial exploitation[1], and if a company provides information or data to the Government for further approvals or regulatory, such data needs to be protected from leakage or theft by third parties.[2]

Trade Secrets Protection in India

Trade secrets are protected in India either through contract law or through the equitable doctrine of breach of confidentiality. It is common to insert clauses that protect the confidentiality of the secrets of the company in the agreement with the employees not only during their employment period but also after they are terminated.

Protection of Trade Secrets

Due to the absence of law for the protection of trade secrets, the Indian court relies on the common law remedies for the protection. Reliance is placed by Indian courts on the Saltman Engineering case,[3]

In other words, “In India, the law of contract has to be relied upon for the protection of the secrets.”[4] However, “in India, the law that is used is the law of tort of ‘breach of confidence’.”

New Delhi Court provides a list of what can be said to be a trade secret. It says that a trade secret “can be a formula, technical know-how or a peculiar mode or method of business adopted by an employer which is unknown to others.”[5]  However, routine affairs of the employer which are commonly in the knowledge of his employees and his competitors cannot be called trade secrets.  The acts that constitutes as a breach of confidence that is used by the Indian courts are:

(1)  The fact or the information must have quality of confidence in it;

(2)  There must be an obligation of confidence relating to such fact or information;

(3)  There must be an unauthorized use of that information to the detriment of the party communicating it.

Moreover, the Indian Courts have applied these principles in three sets of circumstances out of which proceedings may arise:

(a) Where such fact of information that is secret has come in the possession of an employee in the normal course of his work, who passes that deliberately or carelessly, passes that fact or the information to an unauthorized person;

(b) Where such an employee who is claimed to be in possession of such trade secrets has been invited to provide such information by such an unauthorized person.

(c) Where, in the case of a license, the licensee has committed a breach of any condition that was expressly or impliedly given in the.

Law of contract

In many cases, the Indian courts have held that “although an employer cannot restrain his employee from offering competition after he is terminated from the company, but, the employer has the right to reasonably protect his trade secrets against exploitation.”[6] Moreover, in cases where the contract for such trade secret is absent, injunctions have been issued by the courts based on the rules of equity.

Remedies available

In India, the only remedies available for the protection of trade secrets are civil or equitable remedies for a breach of confidence cause of action.  They include:

  • an award of injunction “preventing the third party from disclosing the trade secrets,” and “confidential and proprietary information,” and,
  • In the case of “for any losses suffered due to disclosure of trade secrets.” The court may order any damages or compensation to be given to the plaintiff. The court may also order the party at fault to “deliver up” such materials.

If an injunction is granted, the fact or the information is considered confidential only for a limited period till which the injunction is given.  If the fact or the information is claimed to be confidential, but only for a specific time, then interim injunction will be granted only for a period which will depend on the circumstances and nature of the confidential information.

In Gujarat Bottling Co. Ltd.[7] case:

Such interlocutory injunction is granted when the ligation is pending. The court in order to grant interlocutory injunction has to apply the following tests:

  • Whether there is a prima facie case,
  • Whether the balance of convenience is in favor of the plaintiff, and
  • Whether the rejection of the injunction would result in an irreparable injury to the plaintiff.

The object of such relief is for the protection of plaintiff against his injury for which he could not be adequately compensated if the uncertainty were resolved in his favor at the trial. Damage in such cases can be determined based on the “market value of the confidential information based on a notional sale between a willing seller and a willing purchaser.”

Conclusion

Sui Generis’ system of protection

In order to ensure the protection of trade secrets, India should also follow the `Sui Generis’ system that ensures the protection that has been provided under Art.10bis of the Paris Convention and Article 39(2) and 39(3) of TRIPS. The result of this would be that this would go a long way in developing a way of respecting trade secrets and undisclosed information as proprietary assets.

National Innovation Act of 2008 was drafted by the Department of Science and Technology, as part of the Ministry of Science and Technology, [8] that would “consolidate and codify the law for the protection of trade secrets, innovation and Confidential Information”.

[1] S. 39(2) TRIPS.

[2] S.39(3) TRIPS.

[3] Saltman Engineering Co. Ltd. v. Campbell Engineering Co. Ltd., 1948 (65) R.P.C. 203.

[4] Sonia Baldia, Offshoring to India: Are Your Trade Secrets and Confidential Information Adequately Protected?, Mayer Brown Bus. & Tech. Sourcing Rev., Mar. 1, 2008, at 10,.

[5] Ambiance India Pvt. Ltd. v. Shri Naveen Jain, 122 (2005) D.L.T. 421, para. 6.; see also American Express Bank, Ltd. v. Priya Puri, (2006) 3 L.L.N. 217.

[6] Zafar Mahfood Rahmani & Faizanur Rahman, Intellection of Trade Secret and Innovation Laws in India, 16(4) J. Intell. Prop. Rts. 341, 347 (July 2011),

[7] Gujarat Bottling Co. Ltd. v. Coca Cola Co., (1995) 5 S.C.C. 545, para. 43.

[8] National Innovation Act of 2008 (Bill).

Download Now

Overview Of The Real Estate (Regulatory & Development) Bill, 2016

2

 

images (16)

In this blogpost, Komal Rastogi, Student, Nirma University, Ahamadabad, writes about the advantages and disadvantages of the Real Estate (Regulatory And Development) Bill, 2016.

“India faces a severe housing shortage and on the other hand, buyers are put off by sky-high Real Estate prices and the unscrupulous practices of many developers.”[1] The Real Estate was largely the concern of State institutions till the 1980s because private promoters were very few. “With the liberalization of the economy, conscious encouragement was given to the growth of the private sector in construction, with a great deal of success, and the sector today is estimated to contribute substantially to the country’s GDP.”[2] Presently, the condition of Real Estate and the housing sector is at its worst because it is highly unregulated and opaque as it lacks transparency.

 Notwithstanding government’s effort, people, are still homeless. Private parties took advantage of this scenario and have been ruling the real estate business since then, which eventually much to people’s disappointment led to high rates of the estate, no proper information about the builders, etc.[3] The other problem which the buyers encounter is regarding the lack of remedies available to them. They are compelled to knock on each possible door for some relief. So far, the buyers were coerced to consent to single sided contract terms as created by their builders because they did not have any other options.[4] To overcome this unscrupulous condition, the need for a Bill concerning real estate was felt and thus, for the first time; the Real Estate (Regulatory and Development) Bill was introduced in Rajya Sabha in the year 2013.[5] This Bill was referred to a ’21- Member Committee’.

Real Estate is a term which comprises not only of land and buildings on it but also of the natural resources of the land which is inclusive of its flora, fauna, crops and minerals.[6] It comprises of three main categories: 1) Residential 2) Commercial and 3) Industrial. The Residential Real Estate includes housing, condominiums, townhomes and undeveloped land.[7] The Commercial, on the other hand, includes offices, warehouses, etc., and the Industrial Real Estate includes factories, mines and farms.[8]

“An official of Ministry of Urban Development said that the industry figures revealed that the Residential realty market alone sees an annual investment of Rs 3.50 lakh crore and about 10 lakh new home buyers every year.”[9] “There are 17,000 real estate projects that are in progress in 26 major urban agglomerations in the country which would come under the domain of the proposed Bill.”[10]

The core aim of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Bill, 2013 was to protect the interest of the buyers and to promote fair play in Real Estate markets.[11] This Bill had been introduced mainly to reach the objective of Government of India to provide “Housing for All by 2022.”[12] The measures in the Bill were propounded with the aim to boost the domestic as well as foreign investment in the sector.[13]

The Real Estate Bill 2013, first and foremost ensured the formation of Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA). This body was created for the registration of Real Estate agents and their subsequent projects.[14] This Bill outlines the duties of developers, buyers and agents in the Residential Real Estate sector.  It also stipulates:

  • Uniform regulatory environment in this sector,[15]
  • Genuine contract between buyers and promoters of Residential Real Estate projects[16]
  • Developers are barred from booking or offering the projects of Residential Real Estate for sale without registering them in RERA,[17]
  • The information of promoter should be uploaded with the details of above mentioned point in the website of RERA,[18]
  • 50% or less of the money paid by the buyer should be maintained in a separate bank for the construction of the project,[19]
  • The framework must have written agreement with completion certificate and payments.[20]
  • A Tribunal of Real Estate was to be devised so that the decisions of RERA could be appealed.[21]
  • Setting up of the Central Advisory Council.[22]
  • The regulatory authority had the power to set rules and regulations[23]

The main purpose of the Bill is to restore the confidence of the people in the Real Estate zone by introducing transparency and accountability in the housing markets.[24] It will help in accessing the financial and capital markets in the long term goals. “The Bill will promote orderly growth through consequent efficient project execution, professionalism and standardization.”[25] Along with guaranteeing speedy trials of disputes and growth to the sector, “it also ensured to curb corruption and use of black money in the real estate market, the Bill will include some provisions which will help in tracking down innumerable sources of black money which currently costs the government Billions of rupees in lost taxable income.”[26]

Drawbacks of the Real Estate (Regulatory And Development) Bill, 2013

Following are the setbacks of the said Bill:

  1. It does not enumerate any difference between the Residential Real Estate and Commercial Real Estate.[27]
  2. Some projects in the Real Estate with certain investors or stakeholders do not come under the category of this Bill.[28] They are:
  • “Government agencies/authorities at Centre, State and Municipal level;[29]
  • Financing agencies like Bank/Financial Institutions[30]
  • Brokers, Underwriters and Bulk Purchasers”[31]
  1. It also does not provide any tool for transferring the booking during the construction time[32]
  2. It fails to provide any additional securities for the retail purchasers[33]

Amendments to the bill of Real Estate, 2013

  1. Establishment of Real Estate Regulatory Authority: Formation of the body called Real Estate Regulatory Authority in States as well as Union Territories to regulate Real Estate projects[34]
  2. Discrimination: There will be no discrimination based on caste, religion, creed, sex, or gender. The government may bring a non-discriminatory clause to allow anyone to buy a property in complex even a transgender.[35]
  3. Applicability of the Bill: The Bill introduced in 2013 was applicable only to the Residential Real Estate. Now, it is proposed to cover both Residential as well as Commercial Real Estate.[36] “Getamber Anand, National President of the Confederation of Real Estate Developers’ Associations of India (CREDAI), said while builders welcome the changes, the Bill should not be retrospective in nature as it would lead to a lot of confusion and delays.”[37] He also said that Commercial Real Estate should be kept out of the ambit of the regulator.
  4. Registration: Previously, the developers had to register the Residential projects if the project was greater than 1000 sq. m. and had more than 10 apartments.[38] But according to the recommendation, “projects on at least 500 sq. m. of the area or with 8 flats also have to be registered to the regulatory authority.”[39] It includes registration of Real Estate projects and agents along with the disclosure of all registered projects as well as the details of the project, layout plan, etc., the authority.[40]
  5. Refund of Money in Case of Misleading Advertisements: Incorrect information, the false statement contained in the notice, the advertisement may lead to reimbursement of the money to the buyer.[41]
  6. Compulsory Deposit of at least 70% of the Total Cost of the Estate: The amended Bill makes it compulsory for the buyers to deposit 70% or more of the total cost of the estate which includes land and construction cost. Earlier, only 50% or less was the required to be deposited.[42] This 70% of the money should be deposited in another bank account and should be only for the above-mentioned
  7. Builders are Restricted from Taking More than 10% Advance Without a Written Agreement: “A builder will not be able to take more than 10% advance money from buyers without a written agreement. Right now, a lot of dealings happen by paying huge advances and the agreement part is delayed by many.”[43]
  8. Structural Defects: It is suggested that builders will be liable for structural defects with imprisonment of five years which is more than the earlier prescribed punishment of two years. [44]In such cases, the jail term is that of one year or five per cent of the apartment cost or both. Other pro-developer measures include single window clearance and digitisation of land records.”[45]
  9. Sale of Property as per Prices Linked with Carpet Area[46]: Carpet area is the area which includes usable spaces like kitchen and toilets, and it should be clearly defined to impart clarity which earlier was not the case.[47]
  10. Resident association: “Formation of resident association has been made compulsory within 3 months of the allotment of the majority of the units in the project so that buyers get to utilize facilities such as common hall, club house, reading room,”[48]
  11. Payment of Interest: Builders have to pay interest if there is any delay or default in the home at the same rate as they charge the home buyers.[49]
  12. Consumer Courts: the aggrieved customers can now approach to any consumer court at the district level also instead of the regulatory body given in the Real Estate Bill of 2013.[50] This Bill also established a fast track dispute resolution mechanism which would solve the disputes within sixty days through appellant tribunal against ninety days earlier proposed.
  13. Notification for the Act: now the “State has to make rules within six months of notification of the proposed Act instead of one year, and the allottees shall take the possession of house within two months of issuance of occupancy certificate.”[51]
  14. Additional Benches of the appellate tribunal: For the speedy adjudication of grievances, an additional bench of the appellate tribunal can be made in a state.[52]
  15. Punishment: For promoters, three years of punishment and for agents one year of punishment has been prescribed for the violation of the orders of the appellate tribunal.
  16. Punitive Provisions: “Punitive provisions including de-registration of the project and penalties in case of contravention of provisions of the Bill or the orders of the Authority or Tribunal.”[53]
  17. The Bill looks to set up administrative bodies at the Central and state level for responsible and transparent business practices.[54]

The news of the Bill changing to an Act will be a sign of relief to the home buyers who have suffered from huge losses, delays in delivery of their projects by developers, and discrepancy in the fulfillment of promises made to them at the time of booking. The changes that have been inserted in the Bill have been widely accepted by the industrial players.

Specialists say that the improvement is sure and subsequently is a step closer towards setting up of a land regulation in India. Om Ahuja, the CEO, Residential Services of JLL India stated that “If the Real Estate Regulatory Bill comes in 2015, it will be the biggest thing for the sector as it will provide protection to home buyers and it will also result in some non-credible players exiting the sector because of the checks and balances that will come in place”[55]

Benefit to the builders

Builders have also been provided with advantages in this Bill 2015. The prime advantage given to the builders by legislation is that they can also impose a penalty on the allottees for not paying the dues on time.[56] In the case of any conflicts with buyers, builders also have the opportunity to approach to the regulator.[57]

Although the Bill has some benefits for builders, it is the builders only who have to pay high amount imposition of the Bill on them. “The Bill provides for a penalty, up to 10 percent of the total project cost or even imprisonment, if builders do not honor their commitment or fail to register themselves with the regulator.”[58]

Conclusion

The Real Estate (Regulatory and Development) Bill, 2013 was introduced in Rajya Sabha and was referred to Standing Committee on Urban Development for examination by the Speaker of Lok Sabha.[59] The Bill has been amended by the government numerous times. The amendments revolving around both Residential Real Estate and Commercial Real Estate must necessarily be taken into consideration and punishment to the developers, etc. should be deliberated upon. In 2015, the Union Cabinet gave the permission to amend the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Bill. Finally, after the effect of umpteen minds, the Bill had been approved by the Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, was passed by the Rajya Sabha on 10th March and subsequently by Lok Sabha on 15th March, 2016.[60]

REFERENCES

  • Online websites:
  • http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/all-you-wanted-to-know-about-real-estate-regulation-Bill/article7496085.ece
  • http://www.credai.org/sites/default/files/Amendments%20to%20%E2%80%9CThe%20Real%20Estate%20%28Regulation%20and%20Development%29%20Bill-2013%20-PIB_2.pdf
  • http://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/realestate.asp
  • http://www.prsindia.org/uploads/media/Real%20Estate/SCR-Real%20Estate%20Bill.pdf
  • https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/realestate-regulation-development-Bill-2013-walls-and-acres
  • http://www.indiapropertyboom.com/2013/06/real-estate-regulation-Bill-in-india.html
  • http://www.prsindia.org/Billtrack/the-real-estate-regulation-and-development-Billi-2013-2861
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=679at0K8DgU
  • http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/article/the-real-estate-(regulation-and-development)-Bill-the-first-step-towards-real-estate-reform-1536-1.html
  • http://www.bestcurrentaffairs.com/real-estate-Bill-2015/
  • http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Hope-for-homebuyers-as-Rajya-Sabha-passes-real-estate-Bill/listshow/51354546.cms
  • http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=118039
  • http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/wealth/real-estate/cabinet-clears-20-major-amendments-to-real-estate-Bill/articleshow/50111009.cms
  • http://www.jagoinvestor.com/2013/06/real-estate-regulations-Bill-will-it-bring-prices-down.html
  • http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/cabinet-nod-for-real-estate-Bill/
  • http://www.hindustantimes.com/india/all-you-need-to-know-about-real-estate-Bill-listed-for-rs-passage-today/story-bvr7LwbdLpH7bLc02B97zN.html
  • http://www.prsindia.org/uploads/media/Real%20Estate/SCR-Real%20Estate%20Bill.pdf
  • http://indianexpress.com/article/business/business-others/real-estate-Bill-takes-final-shape/
  • http://bankersadda.me/real-estate-regulation-and-develop
  • http://www.oneindia.com/india/real-estate-Bill-developers-buyers-home-nda-modi-govt-explained-1737236.htmlment-Bill/

[1] Retrieved on http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/all-you-wanted-to-know-about-real-estate-regulation-Bill/article7496085.ece

[2]Retrieved on http://www.credai.org/sites/default/files/Amendments%20to%20%E2%80%9CThe%20Real%20Estate%20%28Regulation%20and%20Development%29%20Bill-2013%20-PIB_2.pdf

[3] Ibid

[4] Ibid

[5] Ibid

[6] Retrieved on http://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/realestate.asp

[7] Ibid

[8] Ibid

[9] Retrieved on http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/cabinet-nod-for-real-estate-Bill/

[10] Ibid

[11] Retrieved on http://www.prsindia.org/uploads/media/Real%20Estate/SCR-Real%20Estate%20Bill.pdf

[12] Ibid

[13]Retrieved on https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/realestate-regulation-development-Bill-2013-walls-and-acres

[14] Ibid

[15] Retrieved on http://www.indiapropertyboom.com/2013/06/real-estate-regulation-Bill-in-india.html

[16] Retrieved on http://www.prsindia.org/Billtrack/the-real-estate-regulation-and-development-Billi-2013-2861/

[17] Ibid

[18] Ibid

[19] Ibid

[20]Retrieved on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=679at0K8DgU

[21] Ibid

[22] Ibid

[23] Supra 2

[24] Supra 2

[25] Supra 2

[26]Retrieved on http://www.oneindia.com/india/real-estate-Bill-developers-buyers-home-nda-modi-govt-explained-1737236.html

[27] Retrieved on http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/article/the-real-estate-(regulation-and-development)-Bill-the-first-step-towards-real-estate-reform-1536-1.html

[28] Ibid

[29] Ibid

[30] Ibid

[31] Ibid

[32] Ibid

[33] Ibid

[34] Retrieved on http://www.bestcurrentaffairs.com/real-estate-Bill-2015/

[35] Retrieved on http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Hope-for-homebuyers-as-Rajya-Sabha-passes-real-estate-Bill/listshow/51354546.cms

[36] Retrieved on http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=118039

[37] Ibid

[38] Supra 13

[39]Retrieved on http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/wealth/real-estate/cabinet-clears-20-major-amendments-to-real-estate-Bill/articleshow/50111009.cms

[40] Supra 2

[41] Supra 2

[42] Supra 26

[43] Retrieved on http://www.jagoinvestor.com/2013/06/real-estate-regulations-Bill-will-it-bring-prices-down.html

[44] Supra 26

[45] Supra 6

[46] Supra 27

[47] Supra 27

[48] Supra 27

[49] Supra 27

[50] Supra 27

[51] Supra 2

[52] Supra 2

[53] Supra 28

[54] Retrieved on http://bankersadda.me/real-estate-regulation-and-development-Bill/

[55] Retrieved on http://indianexpress.com/article/business/business-others/real-estate-Bill-takes-final-shape/

[56] Retrieved on http://www.hindustantimes.com/india/all-you-need-to-know-about-real-estate-bill-listed-for-rs-passage-today/story-bvr7LwbdLpH7bLc02B97zN.html.

[57] Ibid

[58] Ibid

[59] Retrieved on http://www.prsindia.org/uploads/media/Real%20Estate/SCR-Real%20Estate%20Bill.pdf.

[60] Retrieved on http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/topic/real-estate-regulatory-bill

Download Now

Abetment to suicide

1

This article is written by Harsha Asnani, a  2nd year student at Institute of Law, Nirma University, Ahmedabad.

Protecting the sanctity of life has been a sine qua non intention in the minds of Indian Legislators while drafting any law. Apart from ensuring a healthy existence to a human life it has also aimed at protecting the life itself. The level of respect shown towards a person’s life by state is best explained by the fact that it not only prohibits a person from taking another person’s life but also penalises a person who himself tries to put an end to his  life by means of suicide. The former is made punishable under section 302 and the latter under Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code. Not only this but also a person who assists or abets any other person in commission of suicide is also subjected a certain term of punishment.

  1. Section 306: Important ingredients

Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code defines abetment of suicide as “If any person commits suicide, whoever abets the commission of such suicide, shall be punishable with such imprisonment of either description of a term which may extend to 10 years, and shall also be liable to fine.” In order to bring a successful conviction under this section it is important that its three essential ingredients stand to be fulfilled i.e. firstly, the deceased should have committed suicide, secondly, the accused under this section should have abetted or instigated him/her to commit such an act and thirdly, such the alleged involvement of the accused should be direct[2] in nature.

2. Interpretation of ‘Instigation’

In a landmark judgement of Ramesh Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh,[3] it was held that ‘instigation’ may be inferred from a series of acts on the part of accused that led to creation of such circumstances where the deceased had no other option left with him or her than committing suicide. This series of acts may include use of force, words, conduct, wilful omission or deeds or for that matter even silence of accused in order to annoy or irritate the deceased which resultantly caused the latter to take steps to put an end to one’s life. This overt act has to necessarily coupled with a concomitant element called the mens rea to encourage the deceased to commit suicide. However, in a series of judgements it has been noted by the Apex Court that the use of the word ‘instigation’ need not be confused with ‘intimidation.’ Intimidation may as a result frighten the person on the receiving end which may cause him or her to retaliate whereas statements as a result of instigation may provoke or encourage the deceased to cause his death.[4] In absence of any one of the element either mental process of intentional aiding or an overt act to cause this instigation to commit suicide, conviction will not be successfully sustained.[5]

With regard to matters of instigation it has been reiterated in several Supreme Court judgements that there should be a live or proximate link between the act of abetment and actual commission of suicide.[6] In absence of such a link, the element of intention or aiding cannot be attributed to the accused. Mere threats given by the accused in relation to involving the family in false and frivolous cases cannot be brought under the ambit of instigation.[7]

As far as the second ingredient of abetment to suicide is concerned, i.e., the deceased should have committed suicide, Supreme Court in a landmark judgement of Satvir Singh v. State of Punjab,[8] Section 306 renders a person punishable of abetment to suicide only if the condition of commission of suicide is fulfilled. This is essential because it is possible to abet the commission of suicide and not a mere attempt in furtherance of same. It would be preposterous if law would penalise such attempts also.

  • Application of Section 306

The charge of abetment of suicide is widely used in the cases of dowry demand related suicides or suicides as a result of domestic violence or cruelty. In a landmark judgement, according to whose factual matrix it was alleged that there were constant quarrels between a couple over the husband’s consistent demand of dowry. Eventually on the fateful day during a quarrel of the same kind the wife reacted by saying that she would consider death to be better than her ruthless existence and the state of life she was going through. Upon this the husband responded by saying that he would feel much relieved on her death. Immediately, the wife set herself on fire. The court held the husband guilty of abetment to suicide on the pretext that there was a close link between the act of instigation and commission of suicide.[9]

Similar situations such as  constant beating and torture that led to formulation of mental agony causing the wife to set herself along with her three children on fire,[10] subjection to maltreatment and starvation with the superadded fact of looking for another girl,[11] maltreatment and taunting for bringing less dowry,[12] maltreatment and beating the wife for not conceiving,[13]  husband being obsessed with gambling and creation of ugly and hurtful scenes in committing cruelty on the deceased,[14] history of pressure for cruelty and divorce,[15]  verbal remarks such as “You bloody whore, why don’t you die” (this remark being a part of verbal cruelty and serious provocation to the wife),[16] accused pressurising his wife with parting of land that she had received as a part of stridhan from her father,[17] and transferring it in his name.

 Although there has been a general agreement on the point that cruelty may itself not be enough to cause an offence under abetment to suicide but where the accused has wilfully produced an atmosphere as a result of which the deceased had no other option left and was forced to commit suicide, a conviction may be upheld.

In cases of extra-marital relationships, the mere fact that there was development of intimacy between the deceased’s husband with another lady and his failure in fulfilling marital obligation during the subsistence of marriage, it would per se not amount to cruelty. But if its nature is of such a kind that drives or pushes the deceased to commit suicide it can be taken under the ambit of abetment to suicide. In a case of Pinakin Mahipatray Rawal v. State of Gujarat[18] it was held that in absence of the above mentioned conditions and the fact that there was just a one-sided love affair, fulfilment of all sorts of marital obligations by the accused towards the deceased, no evidence of physical or mental torture to extract dowry, the deceased being under ‘emotional stress’ due to an abortion followed by  the death of the daughter born out of the subsequent pregnancy, it cannot be held that it was the accused who had intended or ever abetted his wife to commit suicide. For conviction it is necessary that a chain of circumstances such as, outrageous acts of humiliation, be so created under which the deceased would commit suicide.[19]

But conviction cannot lie in cases where words have been spoken or any conduct is in continuance of feeling of anger or hard feelings. In such cases since the element of intention remains lacking therefore it cannot be described as amounting to instigation.[20] In cases where there is time gap between when the deceased was last harassed and her death,[21] evidences showing that she was ashamed of faults and was hence committing suicide,[22] lack of enough evidences to show that whether the death of the deceased was accidental or suicidal,[23] the deceased’s death took place within few months of marriage and absence of any complaints by the deceased to her parents regarding any maltreatment, torture, for bringing insufficient dowry,[24]  no implication on the husband in dying declaration,[25] instances of quarrel due to consumption of liquor,[26] the deceased was found to be of hot-tempered, quarrel-some and out-spoken nature, her death being a result of dissatisfaction and unhappiness due to economic disparity between her husband’s family and her parents’ family and not because of alleged torture by her husband and his family members,[27] repeated proposals by the accused to marry deceased,[28] failure of the accused to appear on the settled marriage ceremony date with the deceased with whom he had a love affair cannot be attributed to intention of accused to abet her to suicide or knowledge that commission of suicide was a likely consequence,[29] performing of bigamy by husband and subsequently  living separately due to which the deceased found it difficult to find means for existence,[30]  it cannot be conclusively said that an abetment had necessarily been caused.

In a few cases charge of abetment to suicide has also been brought against the wife for her immorality. In the case of Dammu Sreenu v. State of A.P.,[31] the wife had an illicit relationship with another man who used to pay frequent visits to their place, where on one such day he openly announced that since the deceased’s wife had no problem with his visiting their place of residence, therefore he would continue to come, subsequently took her away and kept her for 4 days due to which the deceased committed suicide. The Supreme Court held that in light of proximity and nexus between the behaviour and conduct of appellant and deceased’s wife to the act of commission of suicide, no interference should be made with the clear and unambiguous findings of the Lower Courts of holding the appellant guilty under section 306 of IPC.

In other matters such as demand of money for recruitment to a job,[32] publication of defamatory article[33] it cannot be said that there existed adequate or any instigation by the accused to abet the deceased to commit suicide. Where the victim committed suicide after 5 months when she was raped, since the charge of rape was not being successfully proved therefore conviction under abetment to suicide also could not be implicated.[34] In cases of student suicide, where on finding gutka packets from the deceased, the Principal scolded, hit and asked him to apologise before many people, the court held that it is unimaginable that the latter had not instigated the former to commit suicide as his actions were in consonance to maintaining discipline among the students.[35]

1.Burden Of Proof

In order to prove a case under this section the prosecution has to majorly rely in circumstantial evidences. It is not necessary that all cases would carry direct proofs for establishing a nexus between the act of instigation and suicide. The two conditions as mentioned in the preceding sections are to be necessarily proved. The burden of proof, as laid down in the Supreme Court judgement of Gurbachan Singh v. Satpal Singh,[36] heavily lies on the prosecution. It is necessary that clear evidences including circumstantial or direct, if available, to support the prosecution story should be produced before the court.

2. Duty of the Court

Through a series of judgements it can be observed that a very protective approach towards women has been adopted by the judicial minds. In light of increasing crimes against women it is regarded as a duty of the court to bring such offended under the record books. Judges have sensitised over the protection of women’s dignity. The kind of effect rendered due to such an assault should not be generalised and therefore be decided on the basis of facts and circumstances of each case.

It is not only the judicial minds but also the legislature who has expressed its concern over this matter. In furtherance of the same a presumption has been injected in the Criminal Justice System by way of Section 113A of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 wherein the death of any woman if occurs within the seven years of her marriage and it is shown that she was subjected to cruelty by her husband or any of the husband’s relative then it shall be presumed that her death was a result of abetment caused by the husband or his relative.

Constitutional Validity and the debate of Euthanasia

The constitutional validity of this section has been challenged in the case of Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab,[37] wherein the constitutional bench by overruling the judgement in the case of P. Rathinam v. Union of India[38] held this section as not to be ultra vires of the Constitution and hence regarding both euthanasia and assisted suicide as unlawful. Subsequently, in the case of Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug v. Union of India[39] although the court paved way for passive euthanasia in exceptional circumstances and under the strict vigilance of court, but still the issue regarding as to whether a person should be allowed for causing death of another person should be held as illegal in cases where the latter remains in a continuous vegetatitive state and has no scope of recovery has been referred to a constitutional bench in Common Cause, A Registered Society v. Union of India. This seems to be of high importance because it is probable that it may change the ambit of what constitutes abetment to suicide by removing the essential element of instigation.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/joinchat/J_0YrBa4IBSHdpuTfQO_sA

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

[1] 2nd year student at Institute of Law, Nirma University, Ahmedabad.

[2] Jagganath Mondal v. State of W.B., 2013 CriLJ 1994 (Cal).

[3] 2001 (9) SCC 618.

[4] Supra note1.

[5] M. Mohan v. State, Represented by Deputy Superintendent of Police, (2011) 3 SCC 626; Amalendu Pal v. State of West Bengal, (2010) 1 SCC 707.

[6] M. Mohan v. State, Represented by Deputy Superintendent of Police, (2011) 3 SCC 626.

[7] Vijay Kumar Rastogi v. State of Rajasthan, 2012 (2) Crimes 628 (Raj).

[8] AIR 2001 SC 2826.

[9] Brij Lal v. Prem Chand, AIR 1989 SC 1661.

[10] State of Punjab v. Iqbal Singh, AIR 1991 SC 1532.

[11] Girijashankar v. State of M.P. 1989 CriLJ 242 MP.

[12] Nirmal Devi, 1983 CriLJ NOC 230 (P&H).

[13] Sudarshan Kumar v. State of Haryana, AIR 2011 SC 3024.

[14] S. T. Dayannand Reddy v. State of Karnataka, 2000 CriLJ 2064 Kant; Bijoy Uraon v. State of Bihar, 2000 Cri LJ 3384 (Pat).

[15] Ram Kumar v. State of M.P., 1998 CriLJ 952 (MP).

[16] Mohan Chand Kholia v. State, 2003 CriLJ 1835 (All).

[17] K. Prema S. Rao v. Yadla Srinivas Rao, AIR 2003 SC 11.

[18] 2013 (3) MLJ (Crl) 700

[19] Dammu Sreenu v. State of A.P., 2003 CriLJ 2185 (AP).

[20] Sonti Rama Krishna v. Sonti Shanti Sree, (2009) 1 SCC 554.

[21] Samir Samanta v. State of West Bengal, 1993 CriLJ 134 (Cal); Ratan Lal v. State of M.P. 1993 CriLJ 3723 (Cal)

[22] Ramesh Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh, 2001 CriLJ 4724 (SC).

[23] State of Maharashtra v. Vasant Shankar Mhasane, 1993 CriLJ 1134.

[24] State of Punjab v. Kirpal Singh, 1992 CriLJ 2472 (P&H)

[25] S. Abboy v. R. Sundarajan, AIR 1998 SC 958.

[26] Sanjay Jain v. State of M.P., 2013 CriLJ 668 (Chh).

[27] Tapan Pal v. State of West Bengal, 1992 CriLJ 1017 (Cal); State of Haryana v. Jai Prakash, AIR 2000 SC 3569;

[28] Ramnath Ajinath Bhandwalkar v. State of Maharashtra, 2012 CriLJ 2497 (Bom).

[29] Satish v. State of Maharashtra, 1997 CriLJ 935 (Bom).

[30] Supchand v. State of Maharashtra, 1995 CriLJ 3939 (Bom).

[31] AIR 2009 SC 2532.

[32] J. S. Ghura v. State of Rajasthan, 1996 CriLJ 2158 (Raj).

[33] State of Gujarat v. Pradyman, 1999 CrLJ 3659 (MP)

[34] Partha Dey v. State of Tripura, 2013 CriLJ 2101 (Gau).

[35] Aroma Philemon v. State, 2013 CriLJ 1933 (Raj).

[36] AIR 1990 SC 209.

[37] 1996 (2) SCC 648.

[38] AIR 1994 SC 1844.

[39] (2011) 4 SCC 454.

Download Now

Harveer Chadha On How As A General Manager He Benefited From Learning Business Laws

0

Harveer - Formal

Harveer Singh Chadha completed the NUJS diploma in Entrepreneurship Administration and Business Laws in 2015. He has done his engineering from Gulbarga University and is working as General Manager with a relocation services company named IKAN Relocation Services based in Hyderabad.

We asked Harveer how the course helped him so far in his career and why he enrolled for this diploma course when he already had a flourishing career. He had very interesting things to talk about his experience with the course. So, we decided to share it with you all as a success story. Over to Harveer:

When I took up the course I was working as a General Manager with a relocation mobility services company and I already had around 12 years of industry experience. I was exploring the options of starting something of my own and wanted to learn the basics of business and entrepreneurship laws.

I was searching the internet for a course which would give me some insight into business laws and I came across an advertisement of NUJS diploma in Entrepreneurship Administration and Business Laws. When I explored it further I found it to be apt for my needs. Secondly, NUJS is one of the top three law schools of India and anything offered by them had to be of good quality. So I decided to enroll for this diploma course.

My purpose of joining the NUJS diploma in Entrepreneurship Administration and Business Laws was more of gaining general knowledge rather than absolute requirement. I’m from a non law background and I deal with legal matters in my day to day work. However, this course has helped me understand different legal aspects from a technical perspective; of which I did not have the knowledge earlier.

As I’m into relocation services, we do a lot of rental lease contracts and the knowledge gained through this course has helped me understand the concepts behind these contracts. Now, I’m able to relate to issues when contracts are written and re-written.

Content wise the course is very good. It is designed in a manner that a person who is not from a legal background can also follow it. I have benefitted the most from the chapters related to how agreements are to be drafted and vetted, what are the precautions to be taken, how clauses can be negotiated etc

The module on labour laws and company formation was also very informative; it has helped me to add value to the organisation where I work by involving in some of these parameters. I’m able to contribute to company in form of advice on labour laws while hiring somebody.

Harveer - Family

This course has empowered me to an extent that I not only understand what my legal team is doing, I also engage in discussions with them regarding different policies, clauses in agreements etc.

 I have mentioned the NUJS diploma in my LinkedIn profile and I feel that the skills gained from this course have helped me add value to my current role.

I have already recommended this diploma to few of my friends and colleagues. At any given point of time, if anyone asks me about this course I would recommend it.

I feel this course is for everyone, starting from a small shop owner to people working in big corporate. Anyone who wants to know the basics of business and wants to take his business to the next level would benefit from this course irrespective of their educational background.

Download Now

Overview Of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007

1

download (32)

In this blogpost, Sudhi Ranjan Bagri, Student, National Law Institute University, Bhopal, writes about who is entitled to claim maintenance under the Welfare Of Parents And Senior Citizens Act, 2007 and duties of the State relating to the act.

Aging is a natural process, and the person starts suffering from some physical inability, sometimes starts losing his mental ability and many such problems have to be faced by the people who are old. Thus, they need someone to take care of them and support them financially if they aren’t in a position to earn.

Therefore, Ministry Of Law And Justice drafted a legislature titled ‘The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act’ (hereinafter referred to as the Act), and it was published on December 31, 2007, after receiving the assent of President on December 29, 2007. As mentioned in Section 1 of the Act,  it shall come into force in a State on such date as the State Government may appoint. The Act mentions that the person would be considered as a ‘senior citizen’ if he is a citizen of India and has attained the age of 60 years or above.[1]

Who is entitled to claim maintenance under this Act (Section 4)

 Section 4 of the Act mentions that a senior citizen including a parent who is unable to maintain himself from his own earning or property owned by him can claim maintenance.

The Act further states that, if the person claiming the maintenance is a parent or grandparent, then he can do so against one or more of his children not being a minor. However if the claimant is a childless senior citizen, then he can do so against his relative. Here ‘relative’ would mean any legal heir of the childless senior citizen who is not a minor and is in possession of or would inherit his property after his death.[2]

Extent of the liability

 In determining the extent of the obligation, it has been stated that the obligation of the children or relative, as the case may be, to maintain a senior citizen or parent (either father or mother or both) extends to the needs of such citizen or parent so that the claimant may lead a normal life.

This Act, however, doesn’t seek to make it an absolute obligation on the relatives of a senior citizen. The Act states that a relative from whom such maintenance is being claimed must have sufficient means to maintain such claimant. Further, the Act also attaches a proviso to it, which states that such person should either have the possession of the property of such senior citizen, or he would inherit the property of such senior citizen. On fulfilling the above-mentioned conditions only, the relative can be asked to maintain the senior citizen.

The Act, contains another proviso, which talks about the proportionate payment by all relatives if there are more than one and all are entitled to inherit the property of a senior citizen, the maintenance shall be payable by such relative in the proportion in which they would inherit his property.

Application for maintenance

 An application for claiming maintenance as mentioned under section 4, before a Tribunal as constituted under Section 7 of the Act, may be made[3]

  • by a senior citizen or a parent, as the case may be; or
  • if he is incapable, by any other person or organisation authorised by him; or
  • the Tribunal may take cognizance on its own (suo motu).

The Tribunal then will issue the notice to the child or relative or other concerned parties. The Tribunal is also empowered to make such interim orders regarding monthly allowances for maintaining the parent or senior citizen, and can ask the child or relative to pay the maintenance amount during the pendency of the original application, as it thinks fit.[4] Also such order has to be made by Tribunal within 90 days from the date of service of the notice.[5] However in exceptional circumstances, the Tribunal may extend such time for a further period of 30 days.

Order for maintenance

The Tribunal may pass an order directing children or relatives to make a monthly allowance at such monthly rate for the maintenance of such senior citizen or parent, as it thinks fit, to such parent or senior citizen. However, before passing such order the Tribunal has to take care of these points:

  1. that the children or relatives, as the case may be, have neglected or refused to maintain that parent or the senior citizen concerned.
  2. that the parent or senior citizen, as the case may be, is unable to maintain himself; and
  3. that the Tribunal is satisfied with such neglect or refusal by the children or relatives.[6]

The maximum maintenance allowance which may be ordered by such Tribunal should be prescribed by the State Government, but the amount in no case can exceed ten thousand rupees per month.[7]

The Tribunal has further been given the power to review its order under Section 10 of the Act. It states that where it is proved that there was any misrepresentation or mistake of fact or a change in the circumstances of any person has to take place, who has been receiving a monthly allowance, then in those situations, the Tribunal is empowered to make such alteration, as it thinks fit, in the allowance for the maintenance.[8] The exercise of this power, however, is upon the discretion of the Tribunal, as is indicated by the use of the word ‘may’ in Section 10 of the Act.

The Tribunal is also empowered to vary or cancel the earlier orders regarding monthly allowances, if the Tribunal considers it fit to do so, in consequences of any decision passed by any competent Civil Courts.[9]

Protection of life and property of Senior citizens

 In the situations where a senior citizen after the commencement of this Act, has transferred his property( movable or immovable), by way of gift or any such transfer, but the condition that the transferee shall provide him basic amenities and physical needs, is attached with the transfer, and thereafter such transferee refuses or fails to fulfill such condition, such transfer of property shall be deemed to have been made by fraud, coercion or undue influence and the Tribunal can declare such transfer as void.[10]

Before this Act came into existence, the only remedy available to  senior citizens in such a cases was to approach the court to ask for the maintenance from the children to whom he had transferred the property but then also such property would be the exclusive property of the transferee and the senior citizen had no right on such property. But by applying the provisions of this Act, a senior citizen can reclaim his property from the transferee.[11]

Duties of State Government

The importance of the interference by the State Government, for proper implementation, can be understood by looking at Section 1 itself. It states that the Act would come into force on such date as the State Government decides.  The Act mentions various duties which the State Government has to fulfill. Following are some of the duties:

Establishment of old-age homes

The Act makes it compulsory for the State Government to establish and maintain at least one old-age home in each district to accommodate a minimum of one hundred fifty senior citizens who are indigent.[12]

Providing medical support

 The State Government shall ensure that[13]

  • the hospitals which are controlled by the Government or hospitals which receive whole or part of their funds from the Government, shall provide beds for all senior citizens as far as possible;
  • separate queues be arranged for senior citizens, so that they don’t have to wait long in the queue;
  • facility for treatment of chronic, terminal and degenerative diseases is expanded for senior citizens;
  • research activities for chronic elderly diseases and ageing is expanded;
  • there are earmarked facilities for geriatric patients in every district hospital duly headed by a medical officer with experience in geriatric care.

Measures for publicity, awareness, etc. for welfare of senior citizens

The State Government shall take all measures to ensure that[14]

  • the provisions of this Act are given wide publicity through public media including the television, radio and the print, at regular intervals;
  • the police officers and the members of the judicial service, along with the Central and State Government Officers, are given periodic sensitization and awareness training on the issues relating to this Act;
  • effective co-ordination between the services provided by the concerned Ministries or Departments dealing with law, home affairs, health and welfare, to address the issues relating to the welfare of the senior citizens and periodical review of the same is conducted.

Power of State Government to make rules

 The Act confers wide powers to the State Government to make rules for carrying out the purposes of this Act.[15]

Every rule made under this Act shall be laid, as soon as it is made, before each House of State Legislature, where it consists of two Houses or where such legislature consists of one House, before that House.[16]

[1] Clause (h) of Section 2

[2] Clause (g) of Section 2

[3] Section 5

[4] Section 5(2)

[5] Section 5(4)

[6] Section 9

[7] Ibid

[8] Section 10

[9] Ibid

[10] Section 23

[11] See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maintenance_and_Welfare_of_Parents_and_Senior_Citizens_Act,_2007

[12] Section 19

[13] Section 20

[14] Section 21

[15] Section 32(1)

[16] Section 32(3)

Download Now

What Is The Procedure For Recovery Action Under SARFEASI ACT, 2002

0

currency-946932_960_720

In this blogpost, Sonal Srivastava, Student, Amity Law School, Lucknow, writes about the SARFEASI Act, 2002, what is the procedure for enforcement of security interest and what is the procedure after the notice is issued.

SARFEASI Act or Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 as it goes was enacted to regulate securitization and reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of security interest and for matters connected thereto. The main purpose for the enforcement of the act was to enable the bank and financial institutions to realize long-term assets, manage problems of liquidity, asset liability mismatch and improve recovery by exercising powers to take possession of securities, sell them and reduce non- performing assets for adopting measures for recovery and reconstruction. So let us have a look at various recovery provisions under the Act.

Enforcement of Security Interest

  • Notwithstanding anything contained in section 69 and 69 A of Transfer of Property act, 1882, any security interest created in favour of any secured creditor may be enforced even without the intervention of the court or the tribunal.
  • A notice under section 13(2) of the SARFEASI ACT, 2002 has to be served upon the borrower as soon as his account turns to be NPA (Non- performing asset) known as Demand Notice.
  • After serving a notice in writing under section 13(2), then the borrower shall discharge in full his liabilities to the secured creditor within 60 days from the date of notice in case he has made default in payment to the secured creditor.
  • In case, the borrower does not dispense of wit his liability then the secured creditor has right to take necessary measures as mentioned in section 13(4).
  • Where a demand notice has been served, and any objection is raised by the borrower, then the secured creditor should reply to the objection within 15 days else he cannot proceed further in reference to this notice.
  • In case the borrower fails to discharge his liability within sixty days of serving of notice, then the secured creditor can move on with any of the following measures as laid down in section 13(4) of the Act-
  1. Take possession of the secured assets
  2. Take management of the business of the borrower.
  3. Appoint any person, to manage the secured assets, the possession of which has been taken over by the secured creditor.
  • The Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or District Magistrate’s assistance can be taken by the secured creditor in taking possession of secured debt. [Section 14].
  • On takeover of management of the business of a borrower by a securitization company by a secured creditor under section 13(4) (b)the secured creditor shall publish a notice in any two leading newspapers, one to be in the vernacular[section 15].
  • On being aggrieved by any of the measures of the secured creditor under section 13(4), the aggrieved party can move to the Debts Recovery Tribunal within 45 days from the date on which such measures had been taken

Procedure after Issue of Notice

Rule 4 of the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 states-

When the borrower fails to acknowledge the amount even after the serving of notice, then the bank or any other financial institution shall move to take any steps under section 13(4), for taking possession of the movable property, namely-

Where the secured asset is in possession of the borrower [movable property], the possession shall be taken in the presence of two witnesses after a Panchnama is drawn and signed by the witnesses as nearly as possible. After taking the possession, the Authorized Officer shall make or cause to be made an inventory of the property as nearly as possible, and a copy of such inventory shall be given to the borrower.

The authorized person shall keep the property whose possession has been taken either in his own custody or in the custody of any person authorized and who shall take care of the property as diligently as a man of ordinary prudence would under the similar circumstances.

In case the secured asset is-

  1. Debt, then the authorized officer shall direct the borrower not to recover that Instead he shall ask the debtor to pay the debt to the secured creditor.
  2. A share in a body corporate, then in such case the authorized officer shall direct the borrower to transfer the same to the secured creditor and shall also direct the body corporate from not transferring the share in favour of any other person.
  3. Other movable property not in possession of the borrower, then the authorized officer shall direct such other person to transfer the property to secured creditor by serving demand notice

In Transcore v. Union of India[1], the issues were-

  • Whether the banks or financial institutions having elected to seek their remedy in terms of DRT Act, 1993 can still invoke the SARFEASI Act for realizing the secured assets without withdrawing or abandoning the OA filed before the DRT under the DRT Act.
  • Whether recourse to take possession of the secured assets of the borrower in terms of section 13(4) of the SARFEASI Act comprehends the power to take actual possession of the immovable property.

The Supreme Court held that withdrawal of application pending before DRT is not a pre- condition for taking action under SARFEASI Act.  It is for the bank or Financial Institution to exercise its discretion as to cases in which it may apply for leave and in cases where they may not apply for leave to withdraw.

The authorized officer is like a court receiver under Order XL Rule 1 CPC, 1908. He can take either symbolic possession and in appropriate cases, he can take actual possession also. There is no dichotomy between symbolic possession and physical possession.

Conclusion

Thus, SARFEASI Act was enacted with a view to recovering bad debts easily and to an extent, it has solved the purpose also. The recovery actions under SARFEASI Act need to be dealt with utmost carefulness and sincerity by the banks, and the rules and procedures are to be strictly followed else a small mistake in regard to the manner of issuance of notice, etc can be a strong defense for the other party.

[1] (2007) 135 Company Cases

Download Now

Whether Keyword Advertising Is A Trademark Infringement Or Not

0

download (24)

In this blogpost, Vernita Jain, Student, National Law Institute University, Bhopal, writes about whether using keywords is trademark infringement or not and the initial interest confusion doctrine.

The era of internet has lead to the coming up of keyword advertising. Generally defined as a “form of advertising on the Internet in which a business pays to have an advertisement [for] a website appear on [a consumer’s] computer screen when [the consumer] uses a particular word or phrase to search for information on the internet,” they [lay a very important role in advertising and marketing of various businesses.

But the problem arises when a person or a company purchases a keyword in order to advertise his product and such a word is a trademark of a third party. In such a case, a consumer is likely to get confused with such keyword, as in if a person is searching a word which is a trademark of a particular third party and is lead towards the advertisement of the keyword purchaser, is that considered to be a trademark infringement?

The problem that is posed by the trademark owner is that this practice of buying keywords results in confusion among the consumers. As a consequence, many of the trademark owners have filed hundreds of cases on their competitors buying such keywords. They claim that the Lanham Act of USA prohibits any use in commerce of a registered mark or imitation thereof that “is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive.”[1] Therefore, such a practice is the practice of trademark infringement.

Initial interest confusion

The doctrine of initial interest confusion says that the confusion occurs prior to purchase. A consumer might be confused at the starting point of his search as a result of the misuse of the trademark by the keyword purchaser.

Thus, the factor that plays a most important role in determining that whether there is an infringement or not is the concept of ‘Initial Interest Confusion.’

In the case of Brookfield Communications v. West Coast Entertainment[2],

The court while giving importance to the protection of the trademark owner  noted that “the use of another’s trademark in a manner calculated ‘to capture initial consumer attention, even though no actual sale is finally completed as a result of the confusion, may be still an infringement.’’

Factors that courts typically consider in determining whether there is a likelihood of confusion include:

  1. The amount of similarity between the goods and services and trademark;
  2. The strength of the plaintiff’s mark;
  3. Evidence of confusion caused to consumers;
  4. The intention of the defendant in using its mark;
  5. The amount of reasonable care that is exercised by the consumer.[3]

The courts have been uncertain on this concept. In many cases, the court has held that such a practice of keyword advertising is normal competition if it does not result in customer confusion.

However, in many cases, the courts of USA, have ruled that if a person or a party uses a trademark of another in the form of a keyword, such act is not considered as a trademark infringement. In order to make a person liable under the Lanham Act for purchasing that keyword and infringing the trademark, the trademark owner has to establish that

  1. Is the trademark being “used” in commerce? 

In order to make a person liable for the trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, it is necessary to prove that the person accused of the infringement must be using such mark or the keyword. However, it is well settled by a number of cases that the use of a ‘keyword’ as a trademark does qualify as a “use in commerce” under the Lanham Act.

  1. What is the consumer searching for?

It has been decided by various courts that if a person types the name of a particular brand or product, then it is to be inferred that he is searching for that particular product or that particular brand. Therefore, in these cases, it has to be assumed that the customer was searching that particular product of particular brand only.

  1. Is the trademark used in the text or body of the advertisement?

It has been decided in the case of Rosetta Stone Ltd. v. Google, Inc,

that the when the trademarks as ‘keywords’ were used in the title or body of an ad or “sponsored link” that appears on a Google search results page there is a likelihood that such would cause consumer confusion.

Keeping the above three factors in mind, it is important that such an attention should be paid to the visual advertisement of the keyword purchaser  on the search engine result’s page, because while browsing the product information the consumer might be confused by the advertisement on the same screen.

 Therefore, if a person uses the trademark as a keyword in the body of the advertisement and tries to confuse the customers, it can result in trademark infringement.

The application of the law on keyword advertising

This doctrine of ‘Initial Interest Confusion’ has not been embraced by all the courts. In the cases of keyword advertising, there are less number of cases where the courts have dealt with the issue of confusion- let alone initial interest confusion.

 Due to the lack of cases on this point of law, many of the courts have decided cases those should have involved initial interest confusion on any other issue that has resulted in some unsettled question regarding this doctrine. Some courts have adopted the aspect of Initial Interest confusion, but some have not considered the online aspect at all.

Conclusion

 Keyword advertising has proved to be a potentially valuable method of online advertising as it has the ability to catch the interested and potential purchasers. However, the law that is applicable to this aspect is not settled and if someone purchases a keyword that is a trademark of a third party it has the risk of infringement.

But it is possible to use a trademark as a keyword without any liability of infringement if the keyword purchaser (a) has given truthful advertisements, (b) undertook preventive steps to avoid confusion between trademark and keyword (c) have avoided a false association between the goods or services advertised and the mark owner.

[1] S. 32 of the Lanham Act.

[2] Brookfield Communications v. West Coast Entm’t Corp., 174 F.3d 1036,  1062 (9th Cir. 1999).

[3]http://www.lgtrademark.com/wpcontent/themes/nextclient/media/Whether_Trademarks_Used_in_Keyword_Searches_Constitutes_Infringement.pdf.

Download Now

Debate On death penalty

0

This article has been written by Sudhi Ranjan Bagri, from National Law Institute University, Bhopal and Sarath, pursuing a Certificate Course in Advanced Criminal Litigation & Trial Advocacy at LawSikho. This article talks about the ongoing debates on the death penalty, provisions in the Indian Penal Code relating to  the death penalty and the advantages and disadvantages of granting death penalty.

Introduction

“If we believe that murder is wrong and not admissible in our society, then it has to be wrong for everyone, not just individuals but governments as well.”  -Helen Prejean, Dead Man Walking

The debate surrounding the capital punishments has once again been started due to the recent ‘intolerance’ debate in the society. While some people are of the view that the offenders or criminals who indulge in heinous crimes must straightforwardly be punished with capital punishment, while others refute this contention and uphold that the criminals must not be out-rightly given the capital punishment, because it would cause more harm than good to the society at large.

In most of the countries, the death penalty has been abolished, while recognising that death penalty has no place in a democratic and civilised society. But, India is among those countries which still uphold the death penalty. This blogpost, would try to analyse the arguments which are presented from both stands while enumerating the provisions under which death penalty is awarded.

To know more about death penalty in India and related landmark judgements, please watch the video below:

The wide demand and  acceptance of capital punishment in the society influenced the lawmakers to extend the scope of death penalty jurisprudence in India. Following the protest after Delhi rape case, the Parliament had amended the Juvenile Justice Act and permits death penalty for children above 17 years if they have committed serious offences. Similarly, the State Legislature of Andhra Pradesh amended Indian Penal Code and extended capital punishment to the offence of rape. The influence of public opinion over the legislature is quite understandable, because the people elect them. But the Judges, who determine the quantum of punishment, are not elected by the people and they are not bound to uphold the public opinion. The Judges are vested with a duty to uphold the values of the Constitution. In the following paragraphs, the author examines  the how far the practice of death penalty in India is in accordance with the constitutional principles. 

Provisions in the IPC

The Indian Penal Code (IPC) provides that only in following offences, capital punishment could be awarded:

  1. Murder (s.302),
  2. Abetment of suicide by a minor, insane person or intoxicated person (s.305),
  3. Threatening or inducing any person to give false evidence resulting in the conviction and death of an innocent person (s.195A),
  4. Perjury resulting in the conviction and death of an innocent person (s.194),
  5. Treason, for waging war against the Government of India (s.121),
  6. Abetment of mutiny actually committed (s.132),
  7. Attempted murder by a serving life convict (s.307(2)),
  8. Kidnapping for ransom (s.364A),
  9. Dacoity [armed robbery or banditry] with murder (s.396),
  10. Criminal conspiracy (s. 120 B),

Death penalty is also provided under the following special and local laws:

  1. Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, 1967 (as amended in 2004)
  2. Defence and Internal Security of India Act, 1971
  3. Defence of India Act, 1971
  4. Commission of Sati (Prevention) Act, 1987
  5. Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Prevention) Act, 1985, as amended in, 1988
  6. Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA)
  7. Prevention of Terrorism Act 2002, (POTA)
  8. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
  9. Explosive Substances Act, 1908 (amended in 2001)
  10. Arms Act, 1959 (amended in 1988)
  11. Laws relating to the Armed Forces, for example the Air Force Act 1950, the Army Act 1950 and the Navy Act 1950 and the Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force Act 1992
  12. Various states (Andra Pradesh, Karnataka, Arunachal Pradesh and Maharashtra) have control of Organised Crime Acts which entail the death penalty.

Judicial review: A Look at some of the landmark cases

The awarding death penalty has been one of the most controversial topics of all time. There have been various cases, but the following 3 cases are landmark cases regarding the death penalty.

Jagmohan Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1973)

The Jagmohan Singh case was important because it challenged the constitutionality of the death penalty. The Supreme Court stated that while analysing Article 21 and Article 72 of the Constitution, it cannot be said that capital sentence was regarded per se unreasonable or not in the public interest.Thus, SC upheld that death penalty can be attributed in various crimes. However, an amendment was made in CrPC, which changed the death penalty from being the norm to an exception.

Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab (1980)

Undoubtedly, the most important case in death penalty jurisprudence in India is Bachan Singh v Union on India. In this case, the Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the death penalty. The moot problem addressed in this case was whether the sentencing procedure prescribed under Section 354(3) of CrPC is unconstitutional to the extents that it vests  the Court with unguided discretion in imposing death penalty. The majority of judges held that the discretion vested with the judges in awarding death penalty is not unguided because it is exercised in accordance with the well recognised principles crystallized by precedents. Therefore, the discretion vested with the judges are not violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution. However, Justice Bagawati in his minority opinion stated that awarding of death penalty as an alternative to life imprisonment was unconstitutional because it confers unfettered discretion on the judges to choose between  death penalty and life imprisonment.

In Bachan Singh, the court had derived the rarest of rare doctrine to ensure that the judges are not conferred with unguided discretion in awarding capital punishment. According to the doctrine, life imprisonment is the rule and death sentence an exception and death penalty should be awarded only when all the alternatives are unquestionably foreclosed. It also mandated the judges to consider the aggravating and mitigating factors of the case which includes the circumstances of crime and criminal in determining punishment. The Court mandated pre-sentencing hearing to examine the aggravating and mitigating circumstances. However, the question we need to address now, i.e after 40 years of Bachan Singh, is whether the court was successful in creating a coherent and consistent basis for death penalty jurisprudence in India.

Machhi Singh v. State of Punjab (1983)

The Machchi Singh case is important because it was in this case that the Supreme Court laid down the criteria which would make cases “the rarest of rare” and thus could invite the death penalty.

Implementation of the Bachpan Singh framework

Three years after Bachan Singh, the apex court in Machhi Singh v. State of Punjab provided five categories of crime which is suitable for awarding death penalty. The categories provided by Machhi Singh considerably enlarged the scope of awarding capital punishment. It gave more importance to the circumstances of crime and failed to give adequate consideration into the circumstances of criminal and the possibilities of reform. The crime centric approach put forward by Machhi Singh was a deviation from the rarest of rare doctrine expressed in Bachan Singh. Many subsequent cases followed the five categories of Machhan Singh and failed to make discussions on the aggravating and mitigating circumstances of crime and criminal. In Devender Pal Singh v National Capital Territory, by following the Machhi Singh categories, court awarded capital punishment. The Supreme Court in his judgment confirming capital punishment made observations on the brutality of crime but failed to make any remarks on the circumstances of criminal.

As per Bachan Singh, death penalty can be awarded only if the alternative options are unquestionably foreclosed. In a civilized society the best alternative for any crime is to reform the accused. If the accused is no more a danger to the society, then there is no need to execute him. Therefore, the Courts need to examine the possibility of reformation before awarding death penalty. In Santosh Bariyar v. State of Maharashtra, the Supreme Court mandated the courts to provide clear evidence as to why the convict is not fit for any kind of reformation and rehabilitation. However, this condition hasn’t been followed in many cases. In Mohd. Mannan v. State, while upholding the death sentence, the apex court opinioned that the accused is a menace to the society and shall continue to be so and he cannot be reformed. But the court failed to indicate any material on the basis of which the court concluded that the criminal was beyond the possibility of reformation.  

From the analysis of the judicial decisions following Bachan Singh, it is evident that the doctrine of rarest of rare has been most variedly and inconsistently applied by the Courts. In many occasions, judges failed to give adequate consideration to the aggravating and mitigating circumstances and eventually death penalty continued to be imposed arbitrarily and freakishly. The Apex Court itself in its notable decisions recognized the arbitrary awarding of death penalty. In Sangeet v State of Haryana, Supreme Court has acknowledged that due to the subjective and arbitrary application of death penalty, it has become judge centric sentencing. In Mohd. Farooq Abdul Gafur v State of Maharashtra Court observed that in cases having similar facts and circumstances, different Benches have reached diametrically opposite results. 

Special factors on the death penalty jurisprudence in India

Recent trend in India with respect to Sexual Offences: The report on death penalty published by NLU Delhi shows that the rate of awarding capital punishment to the offences of rape with murder is much higher than other offences. There is no doubt that rape is one of the most heinous crimes. But high rate of awarding death penalty (52.4% of capital punishments awarded by trial courts in 2019) in such cases raises questions on the ‘unbiased’ decisions made by the Courts. Judges are not the spoke person of public opinion and they never should be. Many legal scholars opined  that the trial court judges are influenced by the public demand for the capital punishment.  Public opinion is the opinion of the majority. The Judges should be governed by the principles of constitutionalism and not by majority opinion.

Socio-Economic Factors: The recent statistics shows that the death row prisoners in India are more from the backward classes of the society. The data published by the Death Penalty Research Project of National Law University, Delhi shows that over 75% of the death row prisoners  belong to backward classes and religious minorities and the majority of convicts’ families are living  in adjunct poverty. These people who are backward both in economical and social respects, are not in a position to here expensive lawyers and get proper representation in the Court.

Future of Death Penalty in India

In Chhannulal Verma v. State of Chattisgarh, Justice Kurian Joseph in his dissenting opinion expressed his various concerns over the inconsistent application of the principles laid down in Bachan Singh. In this case he opined  that the constitutional regulation of capital punishment attempted in Bachan Singh has failed to prevent death sentences from being “arbitrarily and freakishly imposed” and that capital punishment has failed to achieve any constitutionally valid penological goals. 

Advantages and disadvantages

 Advantages

  • Some argue that the punishment which is to be given to a criminal must be dependent on the gravity of the crime which he has committed. For example, if someone has committed a crime like murder or rape, then that person must be given a death penalty because the crime which he has committed is of a very grave nature. The propagators are often of the view that giving death penalty would set an example for other criminals, and thus, it would act as a deterrent, and others who are likely to commit such crimes would refrain from doing so, because of the fear of losing their life. Thus, this would definitely help in reducing the crime rate in society.
  • The next point is that the criminal, who has committed such a heinous crime, might re-indulge himself in the same crime, or any other heinous crime after he has served his term of imprisonment and has been released. Thus instead of giving him imprisonment, if he is awarded a death penalty, the society would not be under threat from such person. Thus to prevent the happening of any such crime, the offender must be given the death penalty. However, this logic seems appropriate only to punish serial killers or those who have been regular offenders and usually indulge themselves in one or other form of crime in everyday situations.
  • Another possible explanation which would support awarding the death sentence is the torture which is very prevalent in jails, either by the jail officials or the fellow-criminals. It is also argued that those who are awarded the life imprisonment, are left with no other option but to live a futile life behind the bars, and hence, it is better to award them the death penalty.
  • Another point is that imprisoning someone is far more expensive than executing him. This, however, cannot be said to be justified to execute every criminal, but only to those who are repeated offenders and are likely to commit heinous crimes in future also.
  • The death penalty is sometimes equated as revenge for pain and suffering that the criminal inflicted on the victim. The proponents of the application of death penalty, argues that those who have taken other person’s life does not have a right to live and hence must be executed. This also attaches an emotional point attached to it, the family members of the victims sense a feeling of justice if such criminals are executed and are left open in the society, so as to commit other crimes.
  • Another point is regarding the safety of fellow prison inmates and guards. Criminals who have committed heinous crimes like murder, and are serving their life-imprisonment sentence, are believed to have a violent personality, and such criminals may, in future, attack someone during imprisonment.

The abovementioned points emphasize the importance of death penalty for the safety and betterment of human society. However, there are others who believe that it is an immoral and unethical act of violence.

Disadvantages

  • The first and foremost point is that if we execute a criminal, there will not be any difference between us and the criminal who has committed the horrifying crime. As terminating the life of the criminal would not terminate the crime itself.
  • Awarding capital punishment cannot always be said to be just and appropriate. Those who are not financially sound and cannot afford a good lawyer have to succumb to the death penalty while those who can easily afford good lawyers as they have plenty of money are less likely to be awarded a death penalty, as they usually employ best amongst the lawyers to defend their case. Thus, this doesn’t seems to be just and thus capital punishment must be abolished completely, so as to eradicate this disparity in this society.
  • The crimes are related to the psychology of an individual, and not giving him a second chance seems to be unfair. Thus, it can be said that imprisoning a person is always a better option than to execute him because the criminal may realise his wrongful act and might want to change himself.
  • Not all convictions which take place are correct; sometimes an innocent person may be wrongly convicted of some heinous crime, which in reality was never committed by him. There are instances in our country, where persons who are convicted are later found to be innocent, and hence, their conviction is revoked, but if based on such conviction the person is executed, this would be a gross injustice and hence must be prevented.
  • It is also argued that the there is no relation between the death penalty and crime rate. Executing criminals by awarding death penalty does not decrease crime rate in the society. Crimes are still prevalent in countries where the death penalty exists and thus it cannot be said that death penalty would curb the happening of the crimes.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court has, in various cases, declared that the death penalty should not be declared unconstitutional, because the framers of the Constitution hasn’t seen it fit to do so, and that the legislature also hasn’t taken any steps to abolish the death penalty.

However, there are various arguments which contend for abolishing the death penalty. The emotional stigma of revenge would lead us nowhere else than in a cycle of violence and the sadness. Thus, in my view, executing criminals by awarding them death penalty should be abolished and that there is no place in the modern world for such killings by the State, and that India should abolish the death penalty as soon as possible.

From the analysis of various judgments pronounced by the Courts, I understood that there is no uniformity in precedents. The subjective and arbitrary awarding of capital punishment has made the death penalty jurisprudence into ‘judge centric jurisprudence’. The personal morality (predilection) of judges is more important than the principles laid by precedents. This has created uncertainty in the outcome of death penalty litigation and the same has been acknowledged in various judgments. Therefore, it is high time for the Judiciary to rethink on the constitutionality of death penalty in India.


LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

Download Now

Struggle For Recognition: A Cry For Human Rights Of The Transgendered

0

hqdefault (1)

In this blogpost, Toshali Pattnaik, Student, National Law University, Assam, writes about on what grounds is transgender and individual discriminated, what is the impact of discrimination, what are its results and what is the scenario in India

Introduction

The seminal accomplishment of the feminist movements in distinguishing sex and gender drew attention to how gender is socially constructed. In general parlance, the society perceives gender as a binary. Consequently, gender issues mostly address two sections of the society: men and women. In this process, the existence of the third gender is not recognized, or to be more precise, forgotten. Transgender is an inclusive term incorporating all those individuals who challenge the society’s terminology of gender being a binary category. They have broken away from societal expectations to conform to the binary. The term ‘transgender’ was popularized by Virginia Prince and has been defined as ‘an umbrella term that refers to all identities or practices that cross over, cut across, move between or otherwise queer socially constructed sex/gender boundaries’, by Susan Stryker in her influential essay in the late twentieth century.[1]

With the advent of globalization, the influx of modern liberal ideas created the foundations for an inquisitive mind. Awareness of the social construction of gender identities provided a rich insight into how it is read within the heterosexual matrix of meanings[2]. Some people began challenging this binary category of gender and opened the gates for the emergence of a new category called ‘transgender.’ However, there exists a wide range of diversity in this category where it becomes difficult to differentiate individuals into male and female dualities.

Discrimination against Transgender Individuals

As gender is conventionally perceived as a binary, transgender people are victimized and discriminated when they do not discipline themselves into the seemingly timeless and unchanging traditions of gender identities constructed by the society. The antagonistic attitudes, emotional disgust and indignation felt towards the transgender people encapsulate the struggle they undergo for earning recognition in the society. They encounter hate crime and transbashing, rooting from prejudices and discomfort felt towards accepting their gender identities which challenges our belief system. The society miscasts them as sexual deviants owing to their non-conformity with the gender binary. They encounter incredible barriers as job applicants and are fired, denied promotion or harassed when they reveal their transgender identity. Large scale unemployment leads to marginalization, poverty and homelessness, enhancing their vulnerability towards physical violence, sexual abuse and exploitation. Those who become desperate to find a route out of this forlorn circumstance, become primary targets of the trafficking host. Though sex trafficking of the transgendered people is the most visibly egregious part of the problem, it is just the tip of an iceberg of the massive exploitation and discrimination that the transgendered individuals undergo.

Most of the transgender people undergo economic deprivation and status frustration. This victimization alienates them from the main stream society. The need to be free from this vicious cycle is so intense that they get drawn into the illegitimate opportunity structures.  In the process of seeking prospects in the unexplored land, they create fertile grounds to be exploited.

Further, the transgendered individuals face discrimination in school, housing facilities, public places such as the restrooms, prisons, jails and a numerous other domains which makes the list endless. The denial of medical amenities creates reluctance in their attitudes to access the health care mechanisms and make them lose faith in the entire system. Browsing ‘Discriminations against Transgender’ fills the desktop screen with latest news highlighting the social stigma the transgendered undergo. Even when a transgender is discriminated against, their voices do not always reach the legal system running the country. The only thing they seek is recognition to live their life peacefully. However, societal prejudices and belief system does not permit the same. The scene fades to oblivion at key moments, selectively revealing the demise of the transgendered.

The tale of Amanda Milan and Gwen Amber Rose Araujo speaks volumes about the struggle that a transgender individual undergoes for mere survival in the prejudiced society.

Impact of the Discrimination

As every action has an equal and opposite reaction, similarly, the discrimination imparted by the society on the transgendered has profound impact on the society itself. Society has witnessed perpetration of violence and crimes by transgendered individuals, which stems from the aggravating resentment cultivated by negative societal reactions towards their perceived sexual orientation. The abrasive attitude towards the transgendered individuals in turn plummets the level of self esteem and self worth in them, leading to an increase in high risk behaviors, such as sex work.[3] The passengers travelling in Indian Railways face the threat of extortion by the transgender people. Apart from these negative impacts, the aggravating repugnance that society exhibits towards the transgender community has driven them towards making an undying collaborative effort to secure social change by opening the gates for third gender rights. The escalating awareness about human rights has provided a tremendous boost to the revolutionary attempts of the transgender activists. The scene has sought to capture the view of many scholars, nationalizing and internationalizing the cry for human rights of the transgendered individuals.

Results and discussions

Human Rights are inalienable fundamental rights derived from natural law. As natural law is independent of human will and is considered to be superior to all other laws, human rights are conferred upon every individual without any discrimination. They are individual entitlements accepted universally. The first article of Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) establishes the foundation of human rights. Whenever an individual is subject to torture, cruelty, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, then according to Article-5 of UDHR and Article-7 of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, there occurs human rights violation.  Further, paragraph 21 of the United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, Degrading Treatment or Punishment clearly states that ‘States must ensure the protection of all individuals regardless of their sexual orientation or transgender identity by prohibiting and preventing all acts of violence and abuse against these individuals.[4] These international legislations for protection of human rights are followed in various nations all over the world, to secure transgender rights. Transgender individuals express an innate sense of gender other than their birth sex.[5] Because of their non-conformity with the gender norms, they become targets of hate crimes and exploitation. The term ‘transgender’ includes, but is not limited to, transsexuality, heterosexual transvestism, gay drag, butch lesbianism, and such non-European identities as the Native American berdache or the Indian Hijra.[6] Hindu Mythology speaks luminously about the transgendered individuals. The Vedas and the Puranic scriptures recognize their distinct gender identity. The concept of ‘psychological sex’ enshrined in the Jain texts provides evidence that the religion identifies transgender individuals. They even occupied a significant role in the royal courts in Medieval India. However, under the British Raj, they were labeled as ‘innately criminal’ under the Criminal Tribes Act, 1871.[7] Ever since then, they have been victimized and exploited by the prejudiced society.

The transgender community suffers from neglect, humiliation and trauma all over the world. In India, transgender earn their daily bread by begging, performing religious ceremonies and most painfully through sexual work.[8] They face social ostracism and are even disowned by their own families on revealing their transgender identity. The social stigma, poor treatment, and denial of medical amenities create reluctance in their attitudes to access educational facilities and health care mechanisms. State mechanisms of Police who are considered to be the protectors of rights are unfortunately becoming predators of their rights.[9]Thus, the tale of human rights violation of the transgender recapitulates the throes of revolutionary social change that they desire to bring about.

Indian Scenario

The abrasive attitude of the society towards the transgender springs from the fact that they lack equality before law. The Indian Penal Code defines ‘gender’ in Section 8, ‘man’ and ‘woman’ in section 10 and ‘person’ in section 11. The absence of the term ‘third gender’ in the penal law of India is what arouses concern in the transgender community. However, they can be included under Section 12 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 which provides a wide scope to the definition of ‘public’. Yet, interpretation of this provision to include the term ‘transgender’ would provide the marginalized community some respite.

Further, Section 377 of IPC criminalized private consensual sex between adult of the same sex which violated Articles 14, 15, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India. Under this provision they were discriminated and threatened by Police. Even NGOs working with sexual minorities were harassed.  This piqued a cry for justice for the transgender. Only after the Delhi High Court judgment in Naz Foundation v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi[10]decriminalizing Section 377 with respect to gays, the transgender community took a sigh of relief. However, the Supreme Court turned the clock back with the gay sex bam on 11th December, 2013 unequivocally stating that the 2009 Delhi High Court verdict that decriminalized homosexuality was not constitutionally sustainable as only Parliament could change a law, not the courts.  This left the gay activists and the transgender community in despair.

However, the inclusion of ‘other gender’ in passports, voter’s identity cards and other identification documents has provided the transgendered an opportunity to step forward. They were even incorporated in the 2011 census. Further, the Union legislature has made both the perpetrator and survivor of the acid attacks gender neutral.[11]

According to the UNDP Indian Annual Report for 2010[12], attempts to bring the less privileged communities to the forefront has ensured sustained advocacy for the transgender community which has resulted in greater recognition of their specific needs in planning and legal procedures. It is now possible for them to access free legal aid from the government. They have even contributed to the 12th Five Year Planning Process with the help of UNDP.

This changing scenario is ameliorating the lives of the transgender people. However, the path breaking judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India [13]recognized ‘Third Gender’ and directed the Centre and State Governments to treat them as Socially and Educationally Backward Classes of Citizens and extend to them the privilege of reservation, medical amenities, educational facilities etc. This gave a cause for celebration to the less heard community. Further in the case of Shivani Bhat v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.[14] And K.Prithika Yashini v. The Chairman of Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board[15], the human rights of the transgendered community was recognized, thus declaring victory of the transgendered in their battle for recognition.

Conclusion

The transgender community has endured injustice, prejudices, hatred, humiliation, indignation, violence, abuse and different forms of exploitation at the hands of the society. This discrimination had remained hidden within the massive population dynamics of the nation as they lacked equality before law. Previously, the veil of ignorance and prejudice made the identification of their struggle for survival formidable.  However, due to the active role of the media and the transactivists, news related to the human rights violation of the transgender has served as a wakeup call to many incognizant souls in deep slumber. Social acceptance is the best way to secure the transgender rights. However, judicial activism, political considerations and social sensitization of transgender rights is the call of the hour. Today, events like International Transgender Day of Visibility, Transmarch, Pride parade etc are being observed worldwide to bring about cognizance and flexibility among the general masses. The Transgender Day of Remembrance, celebrated on 20th November every year, is an event observed in the memory of those transgender individuals who had pledged their life to improving the conditions of the queer group. However, endeavors from the society are equally required to restore the status and rights that the transgender community once enjoyed.  This is possible only if we change our current belief system and develop a tractable attitude.

India is a democratic republic. The Indian Government is of the people, for the people and by the people. Thus protection of human rights of the citizens of India is the soul of democracy. Moreover, judiciary is the guardian of the Constitution of India. As the Constitution grants right to equality before law (Article 14), prohibition of discrimination on the grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or birth place (Article 15), freedom of speech and expression (Article 19) and right to life and personal liberty (Article 21), it is of upmost importance that the judiciary, through judicial interpretation of the existing law, secure the human rights of the transgender community.

Transphobia is a threat to humanity. The battle between transrespect and transphobia has now become a war. It is solely upon us to decide which side wins. The transgender community has already witnessed immense exploitation because of their non-conformity with the socially constructed gender binary. Not accepting them even after hearing their cry for help and understanding the insurmountable odds that they undergo, would be a shame on humanity. Mere recognition of their community in the society is all they desire to lead a peaceful life. So let us come together and end their struggle against violence and exploitation.

This blogpost was originally published on http://racolblegal.com/struggle-for-recognition-a-cry-for-human-rights-of-the-transgendered/

[1]Paisley Currah, Richard M. Juang & Shannon Minter, Transgender Rights 4 (1st ed. 2006).

[2]Sally Hines, Transgender Identities: Towards a Social Analysis Of Gender Diversity 214 (2010).

[3]Indrani Sen Gupta, Human Rights of Minority and Women’s: Transgender Human Rights viii (2005).

[4]United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, CAT/C/GC/2 (January 24, 2008).

[5]Indrani Sen Gupta, Human Rights of Minority and Women’s: Transgender Human Rights vii (2005).

[6]Paisley Currah, Richard M. Juang & Shannon Minter, Transgender Rights 4 (1st ed. 2006).

[7]Shivani Bhat v. State of NCT of Delhi, Date of Decision 5-10-2015.

[8]K. Jaishankar & N. Ronel, Proceedings of the Second International Conference of the South Asian Society of Criminology and Victimology (SASCV) 276 (2013).

[9]Id. at 276.

[10]Naz Foundation v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (2009) 160 DLT 277.

[11]K. Jaishankar & N. Ronel, Proceedings of the Second International Conference of the South Asian Society of Criminology and Victimology (SASCV) 278 (2013).

[12]UNDP in India: Results from 2010, www.in.undp.org, retrived on 2.49PM on 19th January, 2016.

[13]National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India AIR 2014 SC 1864.

[14]Shivani Bhat v. State of NCT of Delhi, Date of Decision 5-10-2015.

[15]K.Prithika Yashini v. The Chairman of Tamil Nadu Uniformed Services Recruitment Board, W.P.No.15046 of 2015, Date of Decision- 3.11.2015

Download Now
logo
FREE & ONLINE 3-Day Bootcamp (LIVE only) on

How Can Experienced Professionals Become Independent Directors

calender
28th, 29th Mar, 2026, 2 - 5pm (IST) &
30th Mar, 2026, 7 - 10pm (IST).
Bootcamp starting in
Days
HRS
MIN
SEC
Abhyuday AgarwalCOO & CO-Founder, LawSikho

Register now

Abhyuday AgarwalCOO & CO-Founder, LawSikho